Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

На главную

Nick Peterson calls himself a Christian while mocking Meghan Markle speaking about her trauma with Oprah. That is not faith. That is hypocrisy. God sees the malice and the cruelty. He will answer for it.

then0toriousjtb's profile picture

The Notorious JTB

3,963 subscribers

14,739 просмотров • 1 год назад •via X (Twitter)

Новости и политикаИскусство
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

Комментарии: 0

Нет доступных комментариев

Здесь появятся комментарии из оригинального поста

Похожие видео

Don Lemon storms a Minneapolis church, then calls the congregation “entitled white supremacists” and claims they don’t practice Christianity like he does. The hypocrisy is wild. He lectures Christians about biblical faith while rejecting it himself, and constantly smears “white people” as supremacists—while being married to a white man. That’s not moral authority, it’s selective outrage.
2:27

Don Lemon storms a Minneapolis church, then calls the congregation “entitled white supremacists” and claims they don’t practice Christianity like he does. The hypocrisy is wild. He lectures Christians about biblical faith while rejecting it himself, and constantly smears “white people” as supremacists—while being married to a white man. That’s not moral authority, it’s selective outrage.

Brandon Tatum

62,461 просмотров • 6 месяцев назад

'Meghan Markle isn't very talented, fortunately for her she found someone that is dumber than her. Prince Harry is just not a very smart person.' Candace Owens slams Prince Harry and Meghan Markle and says Harry is 'a victim of his own stupidity.'
3:53

'Meghan Markle isn't very talented, fortunately for her she found someone that is dumber than her. Prince Harry is just not a very smart person.' Candace Owens slams Prince Harry and Meghan Markle and says Harry is 'a victim of his own stupidity.'

GB News

573,365 просмотров • 3 лет назад

VIDEO: In May 2025, Nick Fuentes said that Charlie Kirk is not a Christian: "He's not really a believing Christian; doesn't really believe in Christ. But he plays that up. He leans into that, plays into that, and the inconvenient part—which is that he doesn't really have faith—he just tries to keep that part quiet."
4:31

VIDEO: In May 2025, Nick Fuentes said that Charlie Kirk is not a Christian: "He's not really a believing Christian; doesn't really believe in Christ. But he plays that up. He leans into that, plays into that, and the inconvenient part—which is that he doesn't really have faith—he just tries to keep that part quiet."

Max 📟

97,657 просмотров • 11 месяцев назад

📣 BY THE WAY MEGHAN (NEE) MARKLE IS NOT ASHAMED OF HER HER FIRST NAME ‘RACHEL’. Decided to address this long running weird theory that is not for the people that are not weird. 🙂 I’ve always found it fascinating that deranged royalists think that calling Meghan, The Duchess of Sussex by her first name ‘Rachel’ would upset her and that calling her by that name is like a slur, insult or jab to her. It’s not! Meghan is her middle name used by her parents from birth simply because they preferred it in the end to the first name they gave her. It’s that simple. As shown in the clip below 👇 where Meghan happily volunteers to Tv host Rachel Ray in May 2018 that ‘Rachel’ is actually her first name, she is not ashamed of it and if so she wouldn’t have mentioned this as a fun fact about her. 🙂 If not interrupted Meghan was about to explain that her parents called her Meghan. Hence they are responsible for this, not her. Indeed there is no trail that suggests Meghan was ever once widely known as Rachel and that it was her who radically decided to change the name everyone knew her by. She always been known as Meghan! Either way Rachel is equally a cool name too. It’s not a slur or a name people think is not nice. It is a clear example of parasocial behaviour when odd internet individuals come up with theories and project them onto Meghan like deciding she’s ashamed of Rachel and deciding that there’s some sinister reason for why she’s been called Meghan since forever. There isn’t. If you need help with this PSA I believe there is a helpline out there for you somewhere. 🙂 #MeghanSussex #MeghanMarkle
0:31

📣 BY THE WAY MEGHAN (NEE) MARKLE IS NOT ASHAMED OF HER HER FIRST NAME ‘RACHEL’. Decided to address this long running weird theory that is not for the people that are not weird. 🙂 I’ve always found it fascinating that deranged royalists think that calling Meghan, The Duchess of Sussex by her first name ‘Rachel’ would upset her and that calling her by that name is like a slur, insult or jab to her. It’s not! Meghan is her middle name used by her parents from birth simply because they preferred it in the end to the first name they gave her. It’s that simple. As shown in the clip below 👇 where Meghan happily volunteers to Tv host Rachel Ray in May 2018 that ‘Rachel’ is actually her first name, she is not ashamed of it and if so she wouldn’t have mentioned this as a fun fact about her. 🙂 If not interrupted Meghan was about to explain that her parents called her Meghan. Hence they are responsible for this, not her. Indeed there is no trail that suggests Meghan was ever once widely known as Rachel and that it was her who radically decided to change the name everyone knew her by. She always been known as Meghan! Either way Rachel is equally a cool name too. It’s not a slur or a name people think is not nice. It is a clear example of parasocial behaviour when odd internet individuals come up with theories and project them onto Meghan like deciding she’s ashamed of Rachel and deciding that there’s some sinister reason for why she’s been called Meghan since forever. There isn’t. If you need help with this PSA I believe there is a helpline out there for you somewhere. 🙂 #MeghanSussex #MeghanMarkle

Glow Lee

92,179 просмотров • 8 месяцев назад

Nick calls for an honest discussion and investigation into the reality of Epstein's operation. “He is EVIL.” Nick Fuentes reiterates that he is not defending Jeffrey Epstein, and states for the record that he is not minimizing or justifying Jeffrey’s criminal acts.
14:24

Nick calls for an honest discussion and investigation into the reality of Epstein's operation. “He is EVIL.” Nick Fuentes reiterates that he is not defending Jeffrey Epstein, and states for the record that he is not minimizing or justifying Jeffrey’s criminal acts.

Asuka Groyper 🚬

99,295 просмотров • 6 месяцев назад

Nick Fuentes says it's sad that Andrew Tate, who is not a Christian, is the only one who is realistic about feminism "The problem is there are sparingly few Christians that will talk about the reality of feminism like he does."
3:55

Nick Fuentes says it's sad that Andrew Tate, who is not a Christian, is the only one who is realistic about feminism "The problem is there are sparingly few Christians that will talk about the reality of feminism like he does."

Fuentes Updates

108,577 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

'This is a terrible mess and part of a wider row between not just Meghan and her father, but between Meghan and the Daily Mail.' Richard Palmer discusses reports that the Daily Mail is allegedly refusing to tell Meghan Markle which hospital her father is staying in.
4:07

'This is a terrible mess and part of a wider row between not just Meghan and her father, but between Meghan and the Daily Mail.' Richard Palmer discusses reports that the Daily Mail is allegedly refusing to tell Meghan Markle which hospital her father is staying in.

GB News

109,159 просмотров • 8 месяцев назад

Variety really ran anonymous gossip about Meghan and Harry while quoting Netflix execs calling the claims false. That is not reporting. That is clickbait chaos. The audience sees the contradictions. Media credibility is in its flop era.
2:54

Variety really ran anonymous gossip about Meghan and Harry while quoting Netflix execs calling the claims false. That is not reporting. That is clickbait chaos. The audience sees the contradictions. Media credibility is in its flop era.

The Notorious JTB

25,789 просмотров • 5 месяцев назад

Well well well... Meghan Markle had her Sussex terror squad did a mass reporting campaign into OFCOM. GB NEWS was forced to apologize and to that Doria raised Meghan, not Thomas. So who is lying now? The Markles, Meghan, Doria? Answer: ALL OF THEM This is the con of the Century.
0:52

Well well well... Meghan Markle had her Sussex terror squad did a mass reporting campaign into OFCOM. GB NEWS was forced to apologize and to that Doria raised Meghan, not Thomas. So who is lying now? The Markles, Meghan, Doria? Answer: ALL OF THEM This is the con of the Century.

TR G - The Royal Grift

116,519 просмотров • 8 месяцев назад

'That should not be in that paper. If he thinks that, he needs help.' A Jeremy Clarkson column in the Sun about Meghan Markle has provoked outcry online, with social media users labelling it 'vile' & 'abusive'. Clarkson wrote that he loathed Meghan 'on a cellular level'.
2:01

'That should not be in that paper. If he thinks that, he needs help.' A Jeremy Clarkson column in the Sun about Meghan Markle has provoked outcry online, with social media users labelling it 'vile' & 'abusive'. Clarkson wrote that he loathed Meghan 'on a cellular level'.

Good Morning Britain

703,182 просмотров • 3 лет назад

Looking back, how do Meghan Markle and Harry can go on this humanitarian trip but she can’t even visit her own father? Add to that the silence on issues like Nigerian Christians being killed, despite loudly claiming that identity when it suits her. Will Meghan Markle and Harry be speaking out about Iranians as well, or does that not fit their narrative? How does someone live with themselves with this kind of fake humanitarianism just for optics and a few headlines? Every time you think Meghan Markle and Harry couldn’t sink lower, they prove you wrong by showing they are the worst kind of people.
1:01

Looking back, how do Meghan Markle and Harry can go on this humanitarian trip but she can’t even visit her own father? Add to that the silence on issues like Nigerian Christians being killed, despite loudly claiming that identity when it suits her. Will Meghan Markle and Harry be speaking out about Iranians as well, or does that not fit their narrative? How does someone live with themselves with this kind of fake humanitarianism just for optics and a few headlines? Every time you think Meghan Markle and Harry couldn’t sink lower, they prove you wrong by showing they are the worst kind of people.

Queen Esther

65,640 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад

“Equality means that UN Secretary General Ban Ki-moon is equal to the young intern at the UN who is dreaming about shaking his hand. It means that a wife, it means that a wife is equal to her husband; a sister to her brother. Not better, not worse - they are equal” Says Meghan Markle who DEMANDS others to curtsey & to address her as “Her Royal Highness” while cucking her husband, Prince Harry
0:31

“Equality means that UN Secretary General Ban Ki-moon is equal to the young intern at the UN who is dreaming about shaking his hand. It means that a wife, it means that a wife is equal to her husband; a sister to her brother. Not better, not worse - they are equal” Says Meghan Markle who DEMANDS others to curtsey & to address her as “Her Royal Highness” while cucking her husband, Prince Harry

MeghansMole©️

137,740 просмотров • 8 месяцев назад

An ignorant Christian will tell you that Allah is not the God he worships, yet claims that he worships the same God with the Jews! 😂 But the Jews say they worship the same God with Muslims, and strongly reject the idea that they worship the same God with Christians. 😂
0:34

An ignorant Christian will tell you that Allah is not the God he worships, yet claims that he worships the same God with the Jews! 😂 But the Jews say they worship the same God with Muslims, and strongly reject the idea that they worship the same God with Christians. 😂

F A A R E E S 💫 🇵🇸

73,059 просмотров • 8 месяцев назад

📞"I am disgusted that Meghan Bloody Markle is going to the Coronation!" 🎙️"She's not going, Colin!" 📞"SHE'S SAID NO? WHO DOES SHE THINK SHE IS!?" Colin from Portsmouth is furious that Meghan Markle is both going and not going to The Coronation.
1:23

📞"I am disgusted that Meghan Bloody Markle is going to the Coronation!" 🎙️"She's not going, Colin!" 📞"SHE'S SAID NO? WHO DOES SHE THINK SHE IS!?" Colin from Portsmouth is furious that Meghan Markle is both going and not going to The Coronation.

The Exploding Heads

1,127,842 просмотров • 3 лет назад

Jordan Peterson read Stephen Fry's famous answer about God back to him, then asked him what holding it actually costs: Fry once said that if he ever met God, he would ask about bone cancer in children. Peterson brings it up, but not to attack it. He thinks the argument works. Peterson: "Ivan wins the argument, but Alyosha is the better person." Fry: "I don't believe there is such a being, but if there were, I would have many bones to pick with him." Then Peterson turns it. The argument is powerful. The problem is where it takes you. Peterson: "there's a direction that goes in that's nihilistic and resentful and vengeful and angry, and all understandable, but it doesn't look to me like there's anything good in it." He says he tested it on himself. Peterson: "I've had my reasons to be resentful and angry, especially recently, and because I'm suffering a lot of pain." Peterson: "there was nothing in that that didn't make it worse, and that therefore that must be wrong, even though it's justifiable." Fry's answer is that he was never angry to begin with. Fry: "I'm not really resentful and angry about the fact that there's evil in the world. I'm sorrowful very often." Fry: "most people are so good, so anxious to be good, are idiotically good." Fry: "every time I go off to sleep I think, how did I screw up today, how can I be better tomorrow." Then he challenges Peterson's phrase, a higher mode of being. Fry: "show me someone who has a higher mode of existence than I do." Peterson: "that higher mode of existence is what your conscience tortures you for not attaining." Peterson: "you cannot create your own values. The values impose themselves on you independent of your will." His evidence isn't scripture. It's juvenile rats. Peterson: "if the big rat doesn't let the little rat win 30 percent of the time, the little rat will stop inviting him to play." Reciprocity, before anyone believed anything.
13:27

Jordan Peterson read Stephen Fry's famous answer about God back to him, then asked him what holding it actually costs: Fry once said that if he ever met God, he would ask about bone cancer in children. Peterson brings it up, but not to attack it. He thinks the argument works. Peterson: "Ivan wins the argument, but Alyosha is the better person." Fry: "I don't believe there is such a being, but if there were, I would have many bones to pick with him." Then Peterson turns it. The argument is powerful. The problem is where it takes you. Peterson: "there's a direction that goes in that's nihilistic and resentful and vengeful and angry, and all understandable, but it doesn't look to me like there's anything good in it." He says he tested it on himself. Peterson: "I've had my reasons to be resentful and angry, especially recently, and because I'm suffering a lot of pain." Peterson: "there was nothing in that that didn't make it worse, and that therefore that must be wrong, even though it's justifiable." Fry's answer is that he was never angry to begin with. Fry: "I'm not really resentful and angry about the fact that there's evil in the world. I'm sorrowful very often." Fry: "most people are so good, so anxious to be good, are idiotically good." Fry: "every time I go off to sleep I think, how did I screw up today, how can I be better tomorrow." Then he challenges Peterson's phrase, a higher mode of being. Fry: "show me someone who has a higher mode of existence than I do." Peterson: "that higher mode of existence is what your conscience tortures you for not attaining." Peterson: "you cannot create your own values. The values impose themselves on you independent of your will." His evidence isn't scripture. It's juvenile rats. Peterson: "if the big rat doesn't let the little rat win 30 percent of the time, the little rat will stop inviting him to play." Reciprocity, before anyone believed anything.

Naruto

487,238 просмотров • 11 дней назад

.JD Vance: "If we are true to Charlie's memory, the number one thing that people will remember about Charlie Kirk is that he was a great advocate for the Christian faith."
1:26

.JD Vance: "If we are true to Charlie's memory, the number one thing that people will remember about Charlie Kirk is that he was a great advocate for the Christian faith."

Trump War Room

34,054 просмотров • 11 месяцев назад

Meghan Markle is a soulless parasite who knows exactly what she is doing here. Make no mistake, Meghan Markle has a lot of self awareness and is purposely gaslighting the public. She knows what she did to hurt the Late Queen to taint her legacy, and she doesn't care about the damage and harm she has caused. You want to talk about legacy Meghan? Who is going to cry when you die? At this rate, absolutely no one. Behind every successful woman is God and family. Get right with God and stop worshiping yourself as the most important. Being a female flounder is not it. #MeghanIsTheProblem #ConfessionsOfAFemaleFounder #meghanmarkleisanarcissist
1:33

Meghan Markle is a soulless parasite who knows exactly what she is doing here. Make no mistake, Meghan Markle has a lot of self awareness and is purposely gaslighting the public. She knows what she did to hurt the Late Queen to taint her legacy, and she doesn't care about the damage and harm she has caused. You want to talk about legacy Meghan? Who is going to cry when you die? At this rate, absolutely no one. Behind every successful woman is God and family. Get right with God and stop worshiping yourself as the most important. Being a female flounder is not it. #MeghanIsTheProblem #ConfessionsOfAFemaleFounder #meghanmarkleisanarcissist

TR G - The Royal Grift

52,208 просмотров • 1 год назад