Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

На главную

Nick says abortion might be even more available now than before Roe got overturned "Now they want to subsidize getting people all these abortion pills everywhere because Republican states have banned it. So it doesn't seem like abortion has become any less available."

33,940 просмотров • 17 дней назад •via X (Twitter)

Комментарии: 0

Нет доступных комментариев

Здесь появятся комментарии из оригинального поста

Похожие видео

Them: infant mortality rates are higher because of abortion bans!! Sarah Setka ✟ : if you kill less children in the womb, there’s a chance that those infants may die later. Them: that’s false because it didn’t show that abortions went down. I will die on that hill. Sarah: so what do you think abortion bans do? Them: kills women, prevents access to health care!! 𝐓𝐡𝐞𝐲 𝐚𝐫𝐞 𝐭𝐫𝐲𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐭𝐨 𝐜𝐥𝐚𝐢𝐦 𝐭𝐡𝐚𝐭 𝐛𝐚𝐧𝐬 “𝐝𝐨𝐧’𝐭 𝐫𝐞𝐝𝐮𝐜𝐞 𝐚𝐛𝐨𝐫𝐭𝐢𝐨𝐧”, 𝐛𝐮𝐭 𝐚𝐥𝐬𝐨 𝐭𝐡𝐚𝐭 𝐰𝐨𝐦𝐞𝐧 𝐚𝐫𝐞 𝐝𝐲𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐛𝐞𝐜𝐚𝐮𝐬𝐞 𝐭𝐡𝐞𝐲 “𝐜𝐚𝐧’𝐭 𝐠𝐞𝐭 𝐚𝐛𝐨𝐫𝐭𝐢𝐨𝐧𝐬”. Which is it? Can’t be both. Here’s the truth: Abortion rates actually have risen overall the in US since Dobbs was overturned. They are higher in pro-abortion states and lower in pro-life states. They have risen because 1) the abortion pill has become way more accessible and now is the leading type of abortion and 2) pro-abortion states expanded legalized abortion and 3) pro-abortion groups have been funding more abortions. Not one woman has died from an abortion restriction or ban. That doesn’t happen. The infant mortality rate has increased in some places but that also makes sense because a percentage of abortions are done on children with life endangering illnesses, diseases, and disabilities. So if you don’t kill them in the womb, yes, some will die after birth. That’s not an increase in death. They just don’t count it when unborn babies die, only born. If they counted both in the same category, the rates would be lower because a lot of these children who are being aborted actually could have survived.

Samantha D.

24,564 просмотров • 6 месяцев назад

My opinion on abortion. No one at all should be able to tell a woman that she can’t have an abortion before the 20 week mark. Here is why… - Before 20 weeks, a fetus does not have the capabilities for complex neural activity that would be required to have a subjective subconscious. Without a subjective subconscious the fetus doesn’t even know it’s alive, and doesn’t even know it exists. It can’t feel pain, have dreams or have thoughts. - Before 22 weeks, a fetus simply is not considered viable. It almost never can survive outside of the womb even with intense medical intervention. Most scientists believe that sometime around 24-28 weeks is when a subjective subconscious is formed. At this point, I think it’s absolutely wrong to have an abortion, unless the mother’s life is in danger or the likelihood of the child surviving birth is extremely small. Fact is that less than 1% of all abortions in the US occur after 21 weeks. This equates to a little over 4,000 abortions per year. Of these 4,000 (1%), over 99% of them are in instances where a mother's life is in danger or the child has severe fetal anomalies incompatible with life outside of the womb. That means that less than 0.01% (less than 40) abortions per year take place after 21 weeks in which the mother's life isn't at risk or the baby isn't going to die upon birth. Historically, the Roe v. Wade decision (1973) allowed for the right to an abortion but permitted states to impose restrictions after viability (around 24 weeks). So that's why women want to be left alone. Women make the right decision for themselves. States can outlaw abortion after 24 weeks and very few people have problems with this. The federal government nor the states should control women.

Ed Krassenstein

195,699 просмотров • 2 лет назад