正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

【NIKKE Interview - Hansel and Gretel】 4 days until the #NIKKE2ndAnniversary version update! ⏰ Today, let's ask Hansel and Gretel something we're curious about. 🎤 「 What kind of secret finishing moves do you two use when fighting against Raptures? 」 Check out the video below for their answer!...

183,262 次观看 • 1 年前 •via X (Twitter)

0 条评论

暂无评论

原始帖子的评论将显示在这里

相关视频

Utter nonsense! What you pass off as factual reporting is nothing more than regime propaganda, and Trump knows it. Let me spell it out. 1) You claim Rwanda violated the accord because Uvira fell into M23 hands. That is flat-out false. The offensive on Uvira began after two straight days of failed Kinshasa coalition offensives aimed at capturing Bukavu. Presidents Kagame and Tshisekedi flew to Washington even as fighting raged south of Bukavu, including the Burundian army’s bombardment of Kamanyola on Rwanda’s border. You deliberately strip away that context (Kinshasa’s ceasefire violations) and present the response as the original breach. That’s not journalism. That’s narrative laundering. 2) In your so-called “probing questions,” you obsessively demand Rwanda’s withdrawal, yet you have never once asked when the DRC will fulfill its written obligation to neutralize the FDLR. It’s right there in the accords: the DRC neutralizes the FDLR first; Rwanda lifts its defensive measures second. Black on white. You erase the first condition and endlessly hammer the second. That is willful distortion. Again, you have zero integrity. 3) Even when you interviewed Burundi’s president, you conveniently avoided the ongoing violence and siege against the Banyamulenge, carried out with the involvement of his own army. You’ve also never confronted his ally Tshisekedi about the Wazalendo militias he armed — militias that operate alongside Burundian and Congolese troops while terrorizing civilians and committing documented atrocities. Not once do you acknowledge that these groups, alongside the FDLR, are explicitly required to be neutralized under the Washington Accords. What kind of journalist claims to care about civilians while systematically ignoring their worst abusers? Hariana, you’re not a journalist. Trump figured that out. December 4, 2024, was the last time he let you ask a question. Remember this? 👇 You exposed yourself, and since then he’s iced you. Same story with that U.S. lawmaker who recently brushed you off. (see video below) This is what happens when people realize you’re manufacturing reality! Cc: Albert Rudatsimburwa 🇷🇼 , Bojana Coulibaly, Ph.D. African Sir. Uracyaryamye Rosette Uwase Robert Cyubahiro McKenna Andrew M. Mwenda Minister of Food and Drinks🇷🇼 Akech Andrew

Isabelle Karake

30,876 次观看 • 6 个月前

The golden age of YouTube you forgot about. "HEYYEYAAEYAAAEYAEYAA" is the unofficial title of a 2005 animated music video in which the fictional superhero character He-Man sings a rendition of 4 Non Blondes' 1992 hit rock single "What's Up." Since entering online circulation in May 2005, the video has been widely used as a popular material for bait-and-switch trolling, while spawning hundreds of remixes, parodies and music video tributes. The music video was created by two animators at Slackcircus Studios, who were inspired by Eric Fensler's G.I. Joe PSA series, by pairing footage of the titular protagonist from the 1980s American cartoon series He-Man and the Masters of the Universe with American alternative rock band 4 Non Blondes' 1992 hit single "What's Up." On May 8th, 2005, the original copy of the video file was uploaded to the Something Awful forums under the title "Fabulous Secret Powers" The same month the video was uploaded, the creators also launched a faux blog allegedly written in 1995 by the renamed He-Man character, Prince Adam. The video was shared on the eBaum's World forums on May 22nd, 2005 as "He-Man Sings a Gay Song," and on February 11th, 2006, the video was uploaded to YouTube for the first time as "He-Man does 4 non-blondes." Later in 2006, another artist was inspired to create their own He-Man Sings video using Queen's "Bohemian Rhapsody." On November 7th, 2010, a truncated two minute version with the intro, outro and dialogue removed was uploaded to YouTube as "HEYYEYAAEYAAAEYAEYAA", becoming the most popular version of the video. As of today, this upload has more than 209 million views. This version is often used as a bait and switch link, in a similar manner to the Rickroll.

Historic Vids

1,687,466 次观看 • 3 年前

Let me ask you an honest question: Who’s your daddy? If you’re a high school student athlete in Illinois, the answer is easy when it comes to one’s “Right to Play.” It’s not your Mom or Dad. It’s a private third-party vendor called the Illinois High School Association (IHSA). If you play a high school sport, the IHSA controls you even when your school day is over and even more when school isn’t even in session. It’s long been an overreach of control from a small group of narrow-minded ego-driven adults literally dictating what student athletes and families can do in their free time. But much-needed and welcome change is getting closer for all student athletes and their families, as more and more student athletes and parents come forward from present and past to speak up and talk about the disadvantages the IHSA - and those who benefit from it - have and are causing. The first victory earlier this week was by slaughter rule, a 12-0 thumping over the IHSA in committee vote. Now it moves to the big leagues. You can read more here: I encourage you to engage and educate yourself in a topic that 75 percent of high school student athletes across the U.S. can do, but it’s something high school student athletes in Illinois can’t do. Over the next 30 days, you are going to see more stories and hear directly from student athletes, families, leading athletic trainers and doctors, school leaders from Illinois and other states on local and national media outlets talking about this overreach and how the IHSA continues to put student athletes at a disadvantage. So I ask you again: Since when does a private third-party vendor get to control what student athletes and their families do, especially during their free time? Think about that. As you’ll see once again, it’s another classic case of cherry-picking to benefit one’s self by an organization that has now lost three consecutive court cases due to its unlawful dictating overreach. As always, I’ll layout both sides and show you how this has and continues to work easily and well for high school student athletes and schools across the U.S. - except in Illinois. They’ll say “health & safety.” They’ll say “scheduling & other logistics.” I’ll show you how those stocked talking points aren’t even tired, “they’re outdated” as one athletic trainer and other athletic director said to me today. Change for adults who control is always hard. It’s time to do what is right and long overdue for high school student athletes and families in Illinois. You’ll see why loud and clear beginning this week. **This is the first in a daily series.**

Trost

11,116 次观看 • 1 年前