Sensitive content

This media may contain sensitive content.

Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Zur Startseite

【Nina】High-Energy Warning Watch full series: Influencer Nina huge breasts being played, orgasm expressions super realistic #Nina #InfluencerWelfare #BigBreastOrgasm

sintiadevin12's profile picture

sintiadevin

2,674 subscribers

111,294 Aufrufe • vor 8 Tagen •via X (Twitter)

NSFW#Nina#InfluencerWelfare#BigBreastOrgasm
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Kommentare

Keine Kommentare verfügbar

Kommentare vom Original-Post werden hier angezeigt

Ähnliche Videos

what happens when you post your life with zero filter? this is how nina lin built a fanbase out of pure personality. we're kicking off our new series "0 to 100 in 60 seconds" watch the full breakdown
0:59

what happens when you post your life with zero filter? this is how nina lin built a fanbase out of pure personality. we're kicking off our new series "0 to 100 in 60 seconds" watch the full breakdown

Stacked

377,167 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

‼️BREAKING: Candace Owens Issues $500,000 Counter DEBATE Offer After Andrew Wilson’s DISASTROUS Joe Rogan Appearance 🤯 Candace Owens just responded to Andrew Wilson’s appearance on Joe Rogan, where he claimed she was too scared to debate him and that he had offered her $300,000. Candace made clear she had never even heard of Wilson until recently. Early offers came through the Whatever Podcast at $50k and then $150k, which she dismissed as a standard influencer PR stunt. What she did not realize at the time is that Wilson is now being actively boosted inside the Turning Point USA orbit — he has been at TPUSA headquarters, hugged Erika Kirk, was paid by them for debate training, and is being promoted by Blake Neff and Andrew Colvet. Her counter offer is simple and public: 1⃣$500,000 2⃣He travels to her (she is seven months pregnant) 3⃣No chain smoking in the room 4⃣Most importantly, Blake Neff, Andrew Colvet, or Erika Kirk must publicly state that Wilson is representing them in this debate. No walking it back afterward. Candace also played clips of Wilson’s previous debate style, which relies heavily on personal insults and vulgar attacks — a far cry from the clean, high-standard approach Charlie Kirk was known for. She noted that Wilson misrepresented her positions and lied about other groups while sitting with Rogan. If Turning Point USA wants to send someone to debate the case, they can own it openly and meet the terms. Otherwise it remains exactly what it looks like: an attempt to launder a low-tier debater into relevance off Charlie’s death. FOLLOW Candace Owens , RT and watch her FULL episode linked below.👇
12:22

‼️BREAKING: Candace Owens Issues $500,000 Counter DEBATE Offer After Andrew Wilson’s DISASTROUS Joe Rogan Appearance 🤯 Candace Owens just responded to Andrew Wilson’s appearance on Joe Rogan, where he claimed she was too scared to debate him and that he had offered her $300,000. Candace made clear she had never even heard of Wilson until recently. Early offers came through the Whatever Podcast at $50k and then $150k, which she dismissed as a standard influencer PR stunt. What she did not realize at the time is that Wilson is now being actively boosted inside the Turning Point USA orbit — he has been at TPUSA headquarters, hugged Erika Kirk, was paid by them for debate training, and is being promoted by Blake Neff and Andrew Colvet. Her counter offer is simple and public: 1⃣$500,000 2⃣He travels to her (she is seven months pregnant) 3⃣No chain smoking in the room 4⃣Most importantly, Blake Neff, Andrew Colvet, or Erika Kirk must publicly state that Wilson is representing them in this debate. No walking it back afterward. Candace also played clips of Wilson’s previous debate style, which relies heavily on personal insults and vulgar attacks — a far cry from the clean, high-standard approach Charlie Kirk was known for. She noted that Wilson misrepresented her positions and lied about other groups while sitting with Rogan. If Turning Point USA wants to send someone to debate the case, they can own it openly and meet the terms. Otherwise it remains exactly what it looks like: an attempt to launder a low-tier debater into relevance off Charlie’s death. FOLLOW Candace Owens , RT and watch her FULL episode linked below.👇

Project Constitution

319,711 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

🚨SHOCKING: Look At These PHOTOS Of Kash Patel And Spencer Cox From The Day AFTER Charlie Kirk Was Assassinated— Why Are THEY So Happy?😳 Is it just me, or is the energy here COMPLETELY off? 🚩 We’ve all seen the footage from the September 11th briefings. The room is heavy, the stakes are at an all-time high, and the faces in the crowd tell the story: Dan Bongino: Looking like he’s carrying the weight of the world. The Crowd: Somber, focused, and visibly shaken. But Then... LOOK At Patel and Cox. TriggerSmart Just examined these photos taken of Utah Governor Spencer Cox and Kash Patel. While everyone else is in a state of deep concentration or grief, these two are caught in multiple frames with huge grins and smirks. "Everyone else is serious. These two look like they’re at a celebration." — TriggerSmart This was supposedly during an active, high-pressure manhunt. Patel has been linked to Kirk in the past, and it's well known that the both of them were friends. If your friend has just been assassinated brutally in front of the world, would you be "skipping up happily" to a press conference? Before you say it could just be a poorly timed photo, If it were just once, you could say it was a fluke. However there are multiple photos, from different times across that day. That’s a pattern. What do you see? Is this just a case of "nervous smiling," or is there something being said behind the scenes that we aren't supposed to know? Since these theories often hinge on how we perceive emotions, do you think people are more likely to trust "gut feelings" about photos over official statements these days? Be sure to FOLLOW TriggerSmart, watch his FULL video linked below and sound OFF in the comments👇
1:49

🚨SHOCKING: Look At These PHOTOS Of Kash Patel And Spencer Cox From The Day AFTER Charlie Kirk Was Assassinated— Why Are THEY So Happy?😳 Is it just me, or is the energy here COMPLETELY off? 🚩 We’ve all seen the footage from the September 11th briefings. The room is heavy, the stakes are at an all-time high, and the faces in the crowd tell the story: Dan Bongino: Looking like he’s carrying the weight of the world. The Crowd: Somber, focused, and visibly shaken. But Then... LOOK At Patel and Cox. TriggerSmart Just examined these photos taken of Utah Governor Spencer Cox and Kash Patel. While everyone else is in a state of deep concentration or grief, these two are caught in multiple frames with huge grins and smirks. "Everyone else is serious. These two look like they’re at a celebration." — TriggerSmart This was supposedly during an active, high-pressure manhunt. Patel has been linked to Kirk in the past, and it's well known that the both of them were friends. If your friend has just been assassinated brutally in front of the world, would you be "skipping up happily" to a press conference? Before you say it could just be a poorly timed photo, If it were just once, you could say it was a fluke. However there are multiple photos, from different times across that day. That’s a pattern. What do you see? Is this just a case of "nervous smiling," or is there something being said behind the scenes that we aren't supposed to know? Since these theories often hinge on how we perceive emotions, do you think people are more likely to trust "gut feelings" about photos over official statements these days? Be sure to FOLLOW TriggerSmart, watch his FULL video linked below and sound OFF in the comments👇

Project Constitution

67,164 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten

🌟 𝗔 𝗡𝗶𝗴𝗵𝘁 𝗪𝗵𝗲𝗿𝗲 𝗧𝗵𝗲 𝗙𝘂𝘁𝘂𝗿𝗲 𝗚𝗼𝘁 𝗥𝗲𝗮𝗹 — 𝗧𝗵𝗲 𝗙𝘂𝘁𝘂𝗿𝗲 𝗼𝗳 𝗧𝗲𝗰𝗵: 𝗦𝘁𝗮𝗻𝗳𝗼𝗿𝗱 𝗙𝗼𝗿𝘂𝗺 𝟮𝟬𝟮𝟲 🚀 Powered by MiniDoge 𝗦𝘁𝗮𝗻𝗳𝗼𝗿𝗱 𝗙𝗼𝗿𝘂𝗺 𝟮𝟬𝟮𝟲 brought together founders, builders, investors, and ecosystem leaders with one clear goal: talk less about the future — and start building it. The night opened with a 𝗽𝗼𝘄𝗲𝗿𝗳𝘂𝗹 𝗣𝗮𝗿𝘁𝗻𝗲𝗿 𝗧𝗮𝗹𝗸 from MiniDoge , where Tony shared what they’re building — a growing Web3 ecosystem blending DeFi, DePIN, AI, and community-driven innovation. Then came 𝗣𝗮𝗻𝗲𝗹 𝟭: “𝗕𝗿𝗶𝗻𝗴𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝗧𝗿𝗶𝗹𝗹𝗶𝗼𝗻𝘀 𝗢𝗻-𝗖𝗵𝗮𝗶𝗻” featuring Sanjeev Birari (Zoniqx), MD (Orbital Beam), Mia Yu (StockFi), and Jonathan Zhang (DOGAU_Official), moderated by Ken Nim (OffChain Global). The discussion went deep into compliance, institutional capital, and what it really takes to scale Real-World Assets on-chain. Next, 𝗣𝗮𝗻𝗲𝗹 𝟮: “𝗪𝗲𝗯𝟯 𝗕𝗲𝘆𝗼𝗻𝗱 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗘𝘅𝗽𝗲𝗿𝗶𝗺𝗲𝗻𝘁” brought insights from Carrie "Ms.NFTy 🛡️TEXT: EDTECH to 53555 🗣️United Nations" Lyn (Stand With Crypto🛡️), Eric Xu (LBank Labs), and Fernando Jia (Cubed), moderated by Preethy Padmanabhan (Emergent Ventures), covering regulation, AI, and what real adoption actually looks like. 𝗕𝘂𝘁 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗿𝗲𝗮𝗹 𝗺𝗼𝗺𝗲𝗻𝘁𝘂𝗺 𝗰𝗼𝗻𝘁𝗶𝗻𝘂𝗲𝗱 𝗼𝗳𝗳-𝘀𝘁𝗮𝗴𝗲. 🍸 High-signal networking between founders and investors over drinks and curated bites 💬 Conversations turning into roadmap discussions 🚀 Builders, VCs, and operators moving with shared momentum From focused panels to meaningful connections, one thing was clear: the future of AI, Web3, and RWA isn’t just being discussed — it’s being built. Huge thanks to our Lead Partner MiniDoge, Partners Stand With Crypto🛡️, StockFi, DOGAU_Official, Hosts 𝐎𝐫𝐛𝐢𝐬𝟖𝟔.𝐡𝐛𝐚𝐫.𝐞𝐭𝐡, OffChain Global, BrandPR, Langrenus Fund, Co-Host OnePiece Labs, Event Partner 10X Growth Strategies, and everyone who made this night possible. 📹 𝗠𝗶𝘀𝘀𝗲𝗱 𝗶𝘁? Watch the official full event video and relive the energy, insights, and collaborations that defined the night: 👉 #StanfordForum2026 #Orbis86 #MiniDoge #FutureOfTech #AI #Web3 #Blockchain #RWA #DeFi #DePIN #StandWithCrypto #Startups #Founders #Investors #Innovation #CryptoCommunity #TechEvents #Networking
2:23

🌟 𝗔 𝗡𝗶𝗴𝗵𝘁 𝗪𝗵𝗲𝗿𝗲 𝗧𝗵𝗲 𝗙𝘂𝘁𝘂𝗿𝗲 𝗚𝗼𝘁 𝗥𝗲𝗮𝗹 — 𝗧𝗵𝗲 𝗙𝘂𝘁𝘂𝗿𝗲 𝗼𝗳 𝗧𝗲𝗰𝗵: 𝗦𝘁𝗮𝗻𝗳𝗼𝗿𝗱 𝗙𝗼𝗿𝘂𝗺 𝟮𝟬𝟮𝟲 🚀 Powered by MiniDoge 𝗦𝘁𝗮𝗻𝗳𝗼𝗿𝗱 𝗙𝗼𝗿𝘂𝗺 𝟮𝟬𝟮𝟲 brought together founders, builders, investors, and ecosystem leaders with one clear goal: talk less about the future — and start building it. The night opened with a 𝗽𝗼𝘄𝗲𝗿𝗳𝘂𝗹 𝗣𝗮𝗿𝘁𝗻𝗲𝗿 𝗧𝗮𝗹𝗸 from MiniDoge , where Tony shared what they’re building — a growing Web3 ecosystem blending DeFi, DePIN, AI, and community-driven innovation. Then came 𝗣𝗮𝗻𝗲𝗹 𝟭: “𝗕𝗿𝗶𝗻𝗴𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝗧𝗿𝗶𝗹𝗹𝗶𝗼𝗻𝘀 𝗢𝗻-𝗖𝗵𝗮𝗶𝗻” featuring Sanjeev Birari (Zoniqx), MD (Orbital Beam), Mia Yu (StockFi), and Jonathan Zhang (DOGAU_Official), moderated by Ken Nim (OffChain Global). The discussion went deep into compliance, institutional capital, and what it really takes to scale Real-World Assets on-chain. Next, 𝗣𝗮𝗻𝗲𝗹 𝟮: “𝗪𝗲𝗯𝟯 𝗕𝗲𝘆𝗼𝗻𝗱 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗘𝘅𝗽𝗲𝗿𝗶𝗺𝗲𝗻𝘁” brought insights from Carrie "Ms.NFTy 🛡️TEXT: EDTECH to 53555 🗣️United Nations" Lyn (Stand With Crypto🛡️), Eric Xu (LBank Labs), and Fernando Jia (Cubed), moderated by Preethy Padmanabhan (Emergent Ventures), covering regulation, AI, and what real adoption actually looks like. 𝗕𝘂𝘁 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗿𝗲𝗮𝗹 𝗺𝗼𝗺𝗲𝗻𝘁𝘂𝗺 𝗰𝗼𝗻𝘁𝗶𝗻𝘂𝗲𝗱 𝗼𝗳𝗳-𝘀𝘁𝗮𝗴𝗲. 🍸 High-signal networking between founders and investors over drinks and curated bites 💬 Conversations turning into roadmap discussions 🚀 Builders, VCs, and operators moving with shared momentum From focused panels to meaningful connections, one thing was clear: the future of AI, Web3, and RWA isn’t just being discussed — it’s being built. Huge thanks to our Lead Partner MiniDoge, Partners Stand With Crypto🛡️, StockFi, DOGAU_Official, Hosts 𝐎𝐫𝐛𝐢𝐬𝟖𝟔.𝐡𝐛𝐚𝐫.𝐞𝐭𝐡, OffChain Global, BrandPR, Langrenus Fund, Co-Host OnePiece Labs, Event Partner 10X Growth Strategies, and everyone who made this night possible. 📹 𝗠𝗶𝘀𝘀𝗲𝗱 𝗶𝘁? Watch the official full event video and relive the energy, insights, and collaborations that defined the night: 👉 #StanfordForum2026 #Orbis86 #MiniDoge #FutureOfTech #AI #Web3 #Blockchain #RWA #DeFi #DePIN #StandWithCrypto #Startups #Founders #Investors #Innovation #CryptoCommunity #TechEvents #Networking

𝐎𝐫𝐛𝐢𝐬𝟖𝟔.𝐡𝐛𝐚𝐫.𝐞𝐭𝐡

51,045 Aufrufe • vor 7 Monaten

today is a HUGE day... my first project as a director is out now!! "kid for life" by lulu la (full music video) shot, produced & edited by myself & Xavier Jimenez featuring performances by lulu la & Avi Julia Brown with assistance from Jackie Kay & Dan Stadnicki title graphics by FishyPond _________________________ almost a year ago, my roommate Xavier & i were tired of doing nothing but auditioning & had so many stories we wanted to tell. we realized that the only thing stopping us from just doing it was knowing that we had to commit 100% of our time and energy - so i decided to quit streaming & we formed a production company. since then we've been building out sets of high quality cameras, amazing lights, beautiful lenses (some being vintage lenses from the 40s and 50s, rehousing them ourselves to fit modern cameras) & other awesome film equipment *and* learning how to edit, color grade & sound engineer to make an all-encompassing production company that does pre-production, production, & post production. we've played just about every film crew role on our projects so far (to the point where on our upcoming short film i was running sound while operating our b-cam while pulling focus while also directing) & it's been such a fulfilling learning experience. since my exit from the walking dead over 5 years ago i keep hearing the question "so what are you doing now?" and for the longest time all i could say is that i was auditioning for new stuff - and i wasn't proud that i didn't have a better answer. i was fortunate enough to do some amazing projects here & there over the years, but none of them lasted longer than a couple months. now i do have an answer i'm proud of! i'm constantly creating my own projects and telling stories i want to tell, and i get to do it with some of my best friends. so being able to visually tell a story like this music video - wanting to be a kid again, when everything was easier, feels full circle to how i constantly felt when i was in that limbo-stage. and don't worry, i'm still acting. this is just another way for me to be able to create meaningful art that you can watch, feel for & relate to. enjoy!
4:56

today is a HUGE day... my first project as a director is out now!! "kid for life" by lulu la (full music video) shot, produced & edited by myself & Xavier Jimenez featuring performances by lulu la & Avi Julia Brown with assistance from Jackie Kay & Dan Stadnicki title graphics by FishyPond _________________________ almost a year ago, my roommate Xavier & i were tired of doing nothing but auditioning & had so many stories we wanted to tell. we realized that the only thing stopping us from just doing it was knowing that we had to commit 100% of our time and energy - so i decided to quit streaming & we formed a production company. since then we've been building out sets of high quality cameras, amazing lights, beautiful lenses (some being vintage lenses from the 40s and 50s, rehousing them ourselves to fit modern cameras) & other awesome film equipment *and* learning how to edit, color grade & sound engineer to make an all-encompassing production company that does pre-production, production, & post production. we've played just about every film crew role on our projects so far (to the point where on our upcoming short film i was running sound while operating our b-cam while pulling focus while also directing) & it's been such a fulfilling learning experience. since my exit from the walking dead over 5 years ago i keep hearing the question "so what are you doing now?" and for the longest time all i could say is that i was auditioning for new stuff - and i wasn't proud that i didn't have a better answer. i was fortunate enough to do some amazing projects here & there over the years, but none of them lasted longer than a couple months. now i do have an answer i'm proud of! i'm constantly creating my own projects and telling stories i want to tell, and i get to do it with some of my best friends. so being able to visually tell a story like this music video - wanting to be a kid again, when everything was easier, feels full circle to how i constantly felt when i was in that limbo-stage. and don't worry, i'm still acting. this is just another way for me to be able to create meaningful art that you can watch, feel for & relate to. enjoy!

chandler riggs

312,043 Aufrufe • vor 3 Jahren

😬Hooo boy, this one is huge. I hope this post won’t be buried, like ancient treasure. Let’s set aside the 💉, bad food, chemicals…. for a moment. If I’ve understood Dr. Jack Kruse correctly, turbo cancer and turbo disease are born because we’re being electrified from the inside out (electrically de-cohered) Think of it like this: Imagine an old house next to a brand-new nuclear power plant. If someone take a cable and connect that house directly to that nuclear power plant, what happens? Kaboom 🔥 It burns down. But if the power first goes through a series of step-down transformers that weaken and regulate the current, that house receives just enough energy to run safely. That’s what a healthy body does; it regulates energy flow through its mitochondrial circuits. Our mitochondria are the nuclear power plants; our cells are the houses. Melanin acts like the transformer that ensures the energy flows in a safe, usable amount. 🦠When that internal power leaks, the local area burns; and where it burns, disease forms. For some people, the leak is in their spinal cord, for others in the brain, organs, skin, or eyes. You get the point. When the energy stays contained and properly distributed, that’s health. Now, let’s look at cancer. What is cancer? Cancer cells are nothing more than ancient life forms that existed before oxygen filled our atmosphere. It’s like the Warburg effect; the cell reverting to anaerobic metabolism to survive (no oxygen). After the Cambrian Oxygenation Explosion, oxygen became toxic to those primitive cells. So they adapted by forming complex life. But those ancient programs still live within us; and they awaken whenever our mitochondria lose their redox potential (see my previous post for what redox means). 🤔 What makes them flip that switch? A dramatic drop in redox, triggered by blue light, non-native EMFs, 💉and every other modern environmental mismatch. 😌💭imagine a mitochondrion like an egg.🥚 On one end sits 1 antenna 📡(NADH, the electron-donor antenna). On the other sits another antenna 📡(oxygen, the electron-acceptor antenna Between those two antennas 📡🥚📡 is the membrane the egg shell; that holds an electric charge roughly equal to a lightning bolt: ~30 million volts per meter at the molecular scale. When the two antennas stay close, power is high and the shell stays strong. 💪 When they’re stretched apart by stress (light mismatch, EMF, 💉,dehydration, poor magnetism…,), energy output drops and the shell weakens. When that shell cracks, is not a chick 🐣 that comes out, but a high voltage current leaks (like lightning inside the cell). To prevent that catastrophe, Nature designed a special kind of water that doesn’t conduct electricity: deuterium-depleted water (DDW). It’s the perfect internal insulator (a quantum coolant that allows us to hold light safely inside biological matter). Without this structured, low-deuterium water, we would literally be electrocuted from the inside out. ⚡️ In health, the current flows in harmony. In disease/cancer, the current arcs and leaks. And when that arcing becomes chronic; kaboom 💥 that’s the birth of turbo-disease. That’s why I keep saying: REDOX is our best chance to prolong life or survive the 💉… Understand redox, because our survival depends on it. Watch the whole video… because it all connects at the end.
20:28

😬Hooo boy, this one is huge. I hope this post won’t be buried, like ancient treasure. Let’s set aside the 💉, bad food, chemicals…. for a moment. If I’ve understood Dr. Jack Kruse correctly, turbo cancer and turbo disease are born because we’re being electrified from the inside out (electrically de-cohered) Think of it like this: Imagine an old house next to a brand-new nuclear power plant. If someone take a cable and connect that house directly to that nuclear power plant, what happens? Kaboom 🔥 It burns down. But if the power first goes through a series of step-down transformers that weaken and regulate the current, that house receives just enough energy to run safely. That’s what a healthy body does; it regulates energy flow through its mitochondrial circuits. Our mitochondria are the nuclear power plants; our cells are the houses. Melanin acts like the transformer that ensures the energy flows in a safe, usable amount. 🦠When that internal power leaks, the local area burns; and where it burns, disease forms. For some people, the leak is in their spinal cord, for others in the brain, organs, skin, or eyes. You get the point. When the energy stays contained and properly distributed, that’s health. Now, let’s look at cancer. What is cancer? Cancer cells are nothing more than ancient life forms that existed before oxygen filled our atmosphere. It’s like the Warburg effect; the cell reverting to anaerobic metabolism to survive (no oxygen). After the Cambrian Oxygenation Explosion, oxygen became toxic to those primitive cells. So they adapted by forming complex life. But those ancient programs still live within us; and they awaken whenever our mitochondria lose their redox potential (see my previous post for what redox means). 🤔 What makes them flip that switch? A dramatic drop in redox, triggered by blue light, non-native EMFs, 💉and every other modern environmental mismatch. 😌💭imagine a mitochondrion like an egg.🥚 On one end sits 1 antenna 📡(NADH, the electron-donor antenna). On the other sits another antenna 📡(oxygen, the electron-acceptor antenna Between those two antennas 📡🥚📡 is the membrane the egg shell; that holds an electric charge roughly equal to a lightning bolt: ~30 million volts per meter at the molecular scale. When the two antennas stay close, power is high and the shell stays strong. 💪 When they’re stretched apart by stress (light mismatch, EMF, 💉,dehydration, poor magnetism…,), energy output drops and the shell weakens. When that shell cracks, is not a chick 🐣 that comes out, but a high voltage current leaks (like lightning inside the cell). To prevent that catastrophe, Nature designed a special kind of water that doesn’t conduct electricity: deuterium-depleted water (DDW). It’s the perfect internal insulator (a quantum coolant that allows us to hold light safely inside biological matter). Without this structured, low-deuterium water, we would literally be electrocuted from the inside out. ⚡️ In health, the current flows in harmony. In disease/cancer, the current arcs and leaks. And when that arcing becomes chronic; kaboom 💥 that’s the birth of turbo-disease. That’s why I keep saying: REDOX is our best chance to prolong life or survive the 💉… Understand redox, because our survival depends on it. Watch the whole video… because it all connects at the end.

Light Me Away ☀️

49,581 Aufrufe • vor 10 Monaten

The NZ$2B BlackRock renewable energy fund: A failed promise for NZ’s green future? From 2023 to 2025, millions of taxpayer dollars have been lost & the promised jobs have failed to materialise. In Aug 2023, the Ardern's Labour party (led at the time by PM Hipkins) partnered with BlackRock to launch a $2 billion climate fund, aiming for 100% renewable electricity by 2030 via solar, wind, green hydrogen, & battery storage. Hailed as a world-first, it promised jobs and innovation. The fund drew on taxpayer money via NZ Green Investment Finance (NZGIF), a Crown entity funded by public resources incl: ACC, KiwiSaver, & the NZ Super Fund. By using NZGIF, the government exposed taxpayers to risks of financial loss if investments failed-& they did. The first investment was SolarZero- a high-risk company with potential. (With better due diligence, this investment would not have gone forward.) The company was first acquired by BlackRock in Nov 2022 for approximately $110M. However, BlackRock later injected a further $147.8M into the business, bringing total capital involved to roughly $257.8M. Of this, NZGIF provided a $145M debt facility, & BlackRock contributed $112.8M. SolarZero aimed to scale solar energy in NZ with a pay-over-time model. But on Nov 26, 2024, BlackRock placed it into liquidation after it missed sales targets. Of the $145M facility, only $115M had been drawn down by the time of collapse. The full $257.8M was not "lost" as a single sum; the total recovery outcome remains uncertain. The collapse left around 160 staff jobless, with $4-5M in unpaid obligations. The loss of at least $115M of taxpayer money — representing roughly 5.75% of the $2B fund ,this was a huge blow to its credibility, leaving taxpayers with little hope of full recovery. Despite SolarZero’s failure, BlackRock charges fees reported at 1.5% annually on invested capital. While the total $50.57M fee figure is (not verified in public records), it is confirmed that BlackRock charged $4.35M on NZGIF’s $145M commitment, taxpayer money for a failed project. The fund now “seems to have gone nowhere,” with no new major projects announced and roughly $1.69 billion idle. BlackRock’s Auckland office, opened in July 2023 with around 10 staff, has delivered nothing new, appearing only to manage the fallout while fees continue. MBIE, overseeing NZ’s energy strategy, has offered no public updates. The lack of transparency raises questions about the government’s choice to partner with BlackRock, potentially delaying NZ’s 100% renewable goal. The financial losses, fees charged on taxpayer money, & lack of outcomes have led to perceptions of a “renewable investment scam,” eroding trust in BlackRock and the government. January 2026: BlackRock abandoned the $2 billion NZ Climate Infrastructure Fund. The fund is now dead. With $1.69 billion left, there was potential to salvage the fund, but this remains a sad tale of risks with global asset managers & taxpayer funds. Claims have also emerged during this time-including allegations of government officials receiving kickbacks from the deal, with a Ardern being named. No evidence has been provided to support these claims. NZGIF has advanced $314,000 in taxpayer money to fund legal investigations into whether SolarZero hid money from creditors by shifting assets into separate trusts before collapsing. NZGIF's chance of recovery in drawn-down funds hinges entirely on whether the court agrees those payments were improper. If the liquidators win, some money may be clawed back. If not, money is likely gone for good.. 2026 BlackRock has abandoned NZ Climate Infrastructure Fund. The fund is now dead.
6:42

The NZ$2B BlackRock renewable energy fund: A failed promise for NZ’s green future? From 2023 to 2025, millions of taxpayer dollars have been lost & the promised jobs have failed to materialise. In Aug 2023, the Ardern's Labour party (led at the time by PM Hipkins) partnered with BlackRock to launch a $2 billion climate fund, aiming for 100% renewable electricity by 2030 via solar, wind, green hydrogen, & battery storage. Hailed as a world-first, it promised jobs and innovation. The fund drew on taxpayer money via NZ Green Investment Finance (NZGIF), a Crown entity funded by public resources incl: ACC, KiwiSaver, & the NZ Super Fund. By using NZGIF, the government exposed taxpayers to risks of financial loss if investments failed-& they did. The first investment was SolarZero- a high-risk company with potential. (With better due diligence, this investment would not have gone forward.) The company was first acquired by BlackRock in Nov 2022 for approximately $110M. However, BlackRock later injected a further $147.8M into the business, bringing total capital involved to roughly $257.8M. Of this, NZGIF provided a $145M debt facility, & BlackRock contributed $112.8M. SolarZero aimed to scale solar energy in NZ with a pay-over-time model. But on Nov 26, 2024, BlackRock placed it into liquidation after it missed sales targets. Of the $145M facility, only $115M had been drawn down by the time of collapse. The full $257.8M was not "lost" as a single sum; the total recovery outcome remains uncertain. The collapse left around 160 staff jobless, with $4-5M in unpaid obligations. The loss of at least $115M of taxpayer money — representing roughly 5.75% of the $2B fund ,this was a huge blow to its credibility, leaving taxpayers with little hope of full recovery. Despite SolarZero’s failure, BlackRock charges fees reported at 1.5% annually on invested capital. While the total $50.57M fee figure is (not verified in public records), it is confirmed that BlackRock charged $4.35M on NZGIF’s $145M commitment, taxpayer money for a failed project. The fund now “seems to have gone nowhere,” with no new major projects announced and roughly $1.69 billion idle. BlackRock’s Auckland office, opened in July 2023 with around 10 staff, has delivered nothing new, appearing only to manage the fallout while fees continue. MBIE, overseeing NZ’s energy strategy, has offered no public updates. The lack of transparency raises questions about the government’s choice to partner with BlackRock, potentially delaying NZ’s 100% renewable goal. The financial losses, fees charged on taxpayer money, & lack of outcomes have led to perceptions of a “renewable investment scam,” eroding trust in BlackRock and the government. January 2026: BlackRock abandoned the $2 billion NZ Climate Infrastructure Fund. The fund is now dead. With $1.69 billion left, there was potential to salvage the fund, but this remains a sad tale of risks with global asset managers & taxpayer funds. Claims have also emerged during this time-including allegations of government officials receiving kickbacks from the deal, with a Ardern being named. No evidence has been provided to support these claims. NZGIF has advanced $314,000 in taxpayer money to fund legal investigations into whether SolarZero hid money from creditors by shifting assets into separate trusts before collapsing. NZGIF's chance of recovery in drawn-down funds hinges entirely on whether the court agrees those payments were improper. If the liquidators win, some money may be clawed back. If not, money is likely gone for good.. 2026 BlackRock has abandoned NZ Climate Infrastructure Fund. The fund is now dead.

Neil Edwards

11,512 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten

🚨 EXCLUSIVE: Erika Kirk BOMBS at Genoa-Kingston High School Amid MASSIVE Protests! 😱 So Apparently Erika Kirk and TPUSA are also now part of this shady "History Rocks Tour" sponsored by the Dept. of Education with Linda McMahon. More evidence of The Trump admin colluding with Erika and Turning Point. . Genoa- Kingston High School in IL was the ONLY high school picked in the entire state, all thanks to their newly minted TPUSA "Club America" chapter (sounds culty already, right?). But Erika? Total MESS: Low-energy zombie mode, disheveled AF with rat's nest hair, awkward pauses like she's glitching on her script. And the HYPOCRISY? Off the charts! Let's cook her line-by-line—I'm going word-for-word, exposing every lie, fake act, cult vibe, and bitter shade. This is her using Charlie as a prop while preaching what she NEVER practices. 🔥 Let's break it down because this fraud needs a full roast: 1⃣Invoking Charlie RIGHT OFF THE BAT: "Charlie lived his life in a way where he was not afraid to speak. He chose to use his voice for something so powerful..." 🙄 Classic crutch! Erika, you trot out Charlie's name like a emotional shield EVERY time. But reminder: You've been gaslighting everyone about his death, hiding 4K footage, and firing 40+ staff who MIGHT speak out. Hypocrite Alert: You silence voices while praising "using your voice"? Cult-like manipulation—using a dead man's legacy to prop up your failing empire. And that voice change? From soft "emotional" whisper to loud preach—pure acting, flipping on a dime like a bad soap opera. 2⃣Soul-Marking Choices BS: "Every decision will make a mark on your soul... As a young man, know that one day you're gonna be a father. Know that the way that you treat women... It matters." 😂 Erika preaching morality? YOU, who allegedly orchestrated shady deals with "Pierre" (billions in French-Israeli trafficking vibes?), lied about your whereabouts on Sept 10th, and sent cease-and-desist letters to shut down free speech? Lie Exposed: You fire people for "might" be talking smack online, but tell kids decisions "mark your soul"? Your soul's got more red flags than a communist parade. Bitter much? This screams adversarial—projecting your own guilt onto teens. 3⃣Ladies, Be Ladies Hypocrisy: "Ladies, be that. Be ladies, be modest. Live your life in a way that's honoring, honor your parents." 😤 LOOK AT YOU, Erika! Disheveled mess on stage—hair like a bird's nest after a storm, low-energy slop. You're the OPPOSITE of "proper" or "modest." Hypocrite Level 1000: Telling girls to "be ladies" while you act like a hot mess express? And honoring parents? You dishonor Charlie's memory by using him as a prop! Voice shift here: Goes soft and "inspirational," but it's FAKE—eyes dead, pauses like she's reading cue cards. Culty: Pushing this "higher standard" while your org's a purge factory. 4⃣Building Greater Things Lie: "Build something greater than just focusing on what's next in your life. Don't compromise your character." 🤡 "Build something"? Erika, WHAT have YOU built? TPUSA was Charlie's baby—you're just the widow riding coattails, firing loyalists, and dodging transparency. Lie Called Out: You compromise character DAILY—gaslighting about assassinations, ignoring questions, outright lying on Fox. Bitter Tone: "You guys might think it's great to go along with the crowd... to laugh at certain things that aren't funny." Projecting your online hate? People are "laughing" at YOU for being fake and inauthentic. Act Detected: Loud emphasis on "build," then soft pause—shifting expressions like a chameleon. 5⃣Newspaper Front Page Wisdom?: "My aunt used to tell me, never do something that you don't want on the front page of a newspaper. Live your life in that way... not because you're afraid, but because you hold yourself to a higher standard." 💀 IRONY OVERLOAD! Erika, your scandals ARE front-page material: Shady Egyptian planes, Bibi Netanyahu ties, firing sprees, hypocrisy on transparency. Hypocrite Roast: You hide behind lawyers and PR billions, but preach "higher standard"? Cult Vibe: This "people are watching" paranoia sounds like Big Brother TPUSA—watching staff, silencing critics. Voice Weirdness: Draws out "higher standard" loudly, then whispers—total performance, not genuine. 6⃣Insulting People & Assassin's Choices: "You might think it's cool to insult people... The man that took my husband's life, he made a choice over a course of time. He made the wrong decision consistently." 😡 Using the assassin as a moral prop? Low blow, Erika. But YOU insult and attack creators with legal threats for using First Amendment rights! Lie Exposed: "Stand up for the First Amendment" elsewhere, but here warning against "insulting"? You're feeling the online heat—words DO hurt when they're true about your fakeness. Adversarial Bitter: Blaming "choices" while your choices include cover-ups and psyops. Act Alert: Pauses dramatically before "he made the wrong decision"—theatrical AF. 7⃣Grocery Cart Eternal Soul Mark?: "Even though your choice might be small... deciding whether or not to put the grocery cart back... Those choices leave a mark on your soul, feed for eternity. People are watching." 🤦‍♂️ Culty AF! Turning a cart into "eternal soul mark"? This is fear-mongering manipulation—guilt-tripping kids into obedience. Hypocrite: You "watch" your staff like a hawk, firing them preemptively. Bitter Projection: "One day, your kids will watch you." Subtle shade at critics? Voice Shift: Soft and "wise," but it's scripted—long pause before "feed for eternity" like she forgot her line. 8⃣Emotional Breakdown Act: "Sorry, it's just been really emotional these past few days. I apologize." 🥱 FAKE TEARS ALERT! This "emotional" pivot? Pure act—voice cracks on cue, but eyes say otherwise. Using "Charlie started here" as another prop. Hypocrite: Preaching boldness while you're low-energy and messy. Cult End: "Be bold and fearless. Not everyone is called to be on the front lines." Translation: Obey quietly, don't protest like those outside! This clip is PEAK Erika: Hypocritical, culty, acting queen using Charlie as bait. Protests outside? Deserved! Tag Candace Owens, watch, and RT if you're over the lies—TPUSA's crumbling! 💥 📡Side Note: Help us expose TPUSA's "Make Heaven Crowded Tour" below 👇 -WE NEED YOUR HELP
3:59

🚨 EXCLUSIVE: Erika Kirk BOMBS at Genoa-Kingston High School Amid MASSIVE Protests! 😱 So Apparently Erika Kirk and TPUSA are also now part of this shady "History Rocks Tour" sponsored by the Dept. of Education with Linda McMahon. More evidence of The Trump admin colluding with Erika and Turning Point. . Genoa- Kingston High School in IL was the ONLY high school picked in the entire state, all thanks to their newly minted TPUSA "Club America" chapter (sounds culty already, right?). But Erika? Total MESS: Low-energy zombie mode, disheveled AF with rat's nest hair, awkward pauses like she's glitching on her script. And the HYPOCRISY? Off the charts! Let's cook her line-by-line—I'm going word-for-word, exposing every lie, fake act, cult vibe, and bitter shade. This is her using Charlie as a prop while preaching what she NEVER practices. 🔥 Let's break it down because this fraud needs a full roast: 1⃣Invoking Charlie RIGHT OFF THE BAT: "Charlie lived his life in a way where he was not afraid to speak. He chose to use his voice for something so powerful..." 🙄 Classic crutch! Erika, you trot out Charlie's name like a emotional shield EVERY time. But reminder: You've been gaslighting everyone about his death, hiding 4K footage, and firing 40+ staff who MIGHT speak out. Hypocrite Alert: You silence voices while praising "using your voice"? Cult-like manipulation—using a dead man's legacy to prop up your failing empire. And that voice change? From soft "emotional" whisper to loud preach—pure acting, flipping on a dime like a bad soap opera. 2⃣Soul-Marking Choices BS: "Every decision will make a mark on your soul... As a young man, know that one day you're gonna be a father. Know that the way that you treat women... It matters." 😂 Erika preaching morality? YOU, who allegedly orchestrated shady deals with "Pierre" (billions in French-Israeli trafficking vibes?), lied about your whereabouts on Sept 10th, and sent cease-and-desist letters to shut down free speech? Lie Exposed: You fire people for "might" be talking smack online, but tell kids decisions "mark your soul"? Your soul's got more red flags than a communist parade. Bitter much? This screams adversarial—projecting your own guilt onto teens. 3⃣Ladies, Be Ladies Hypocrisy: "Ladies, be that. Be ladies, be modest. Live your life in a way that's honoring, honor your parents." 😤 LOOK AT YOU, Erika! Disheveled mess on stage—hair like a bird's nest after a storm, low-energy slop. You're the OPPOSITE of "proper" or "modest." Hypocrite Level 1000: Telling girls to "be ladies" while you act like a hot mess express? And honoring parents? You dishonor Charlie's memory by using him as a prop! Voice shift here: Goes soft and "inspirational," but it's FAKE—eyes dead, pauses like she's reading cue cards. Culty: Pushing this "higher standard" while your org's a purge factory. 4⃣Building Greater Things Lie: "Build something greater than just focusing on what's next in your life. Don't compromise your character." 🤡 "Build something"? Erika, WHAT have YOU built? TPUSA was Charlie's baby—you're just the widow riding coattails, firing loyalists, and dodging transparency. Lie Called Out: You compromise character DAILY—gaslighting about assassinations, ignoring questions, outright lying on Fox. Bitter Tone: "You guys might think it's great to go along with the crowd... to laugh at certain things that aren't funny." Projecting your online hate? People are "laughing" at YOU for being fake and inauthentic. Act Detected: Loud emphasis on "build," then soft pause—shifting expressions like a chameleon. 5⃣Newspaper Front Page Wisdom?: "My aunt used to tell me, never do something that you don't want on the front page of a newspaper. Live your life in that way... not because you're afraid, but because you hold yourself to a higher standard." 💀 IRONY OVERLOAD! Erika, your scandals ARE front-page material: Shady Egyptian planes, Bibi Netanyahu ties, firing sprees, hypocrisy on transparency. Hypocrite Roast: You hide behind lawyers and PR billions, but preach "higher standard"? Cult Vibe: This "people are watching" paranoia sounds like Big Brother TPUSA—watching staff, silencing critics. Voice Weirdness: Draws out "higher standard" loudly, then whispers—total performance, not genuine. 6⃣Insulting People & Assassin's Choices: "You might think it's cool to insult people... The man that took my husband's life, he made a choice over a course of time. He made the wrong decision consistently." 😡 Using the assassin as a moral prop? Low blow, Erika. But YOU insult and attack creators with legal threats for using First Amendment rights! Lie Exposed: "Stand up for the First Amendment" elsewhere, but here warning against "insulting"? You're feeling the online heat—words DO hurt when they're true about your fakeness. Adversarial Bitter: Blaming "choices" while your choices include cover-ups and psyops. Act Alert: Pauses dramatically before "he made the wrong decision"—theatrical AF. 7⃣Grocery Cart Eternal Soul Mark?: "Even though your choice might be small... deciding whether or not to put the grocery cart back... Those choices leave a mark on your soul, feed for eternity. People are watching." 🤦‍♂️ Culty AF! Turning a cart into "eternal soul mark"? This is fear-mongering manipulation—guilt-tripping kids into obedience. Hypocrite: You "watch" your staff like a hawk, firing them preemptively. Bitter Projection: "One day, your kids will watch you." Subtle shade at critics? Voice Shift: Soft and "wise," but it's scripted—long pause before "feed for eternity" like she forgot her line. 8⃣Emotional Breakdown Act: "Sorry, it's just been really emotional these past few days. I apologize." 🥱 FAKE TEARS ALERT! This "emotional" pivot? Pure act—voice cracks on cue, but eyes say otherwise. Using "Charlie started here" as another prop. Hypocrite: Preaching boldness while you're low-energy and messy. Cult End: "Be bold and fearless. Not everyone is called to be on the front lines." Translation: Obey quietly, don't protest like those outside! This clip is PEAK Erika: Hypocritical, culty, acting queen using Charlie as bait. Protests outside? Deserved! Tag Candace Owens, watch, and RT if you're over the lies—TPUSA's crumbling! 💥 📡Side Note: Help us expose TPUSA's "Make Heaven Crowded Tour" below 👇 -WE NEED YOUR HELP

Project Constitution

949,110 Aufrufe • vor 7 Monaten

Zimbabwean-born author Sukoluhle "Sue" Nyathi is living a dream after a South African super-novella, The Polygamist, produced by Gugu Zuma-Ncube is dominating the screens locally and elsewhere. The Polygamist is based on the explosive 2012 debut novel by Nyathi who studied finance and investment at National University of Science & Technology in Bulawayo, Zimbabwe's second-largest city. It was produced by Zuma-Ncube, a South African producer, actress and daughter of former president Jacob Zuma and his ex-wife Nkosazana Dlamini-Zuma, a retired long-serving minister. Zuma-Ncube is daughter-in-law to Zimbabwean politician Welshman Ncube, a professor of law. She is married to Wesley Bongani Ncube. The Polygamist was directed by prominent Nigerian-born South African actor and writer best known for his role as Khaya Motene in the SABC 1 soapie Generations. Originally self-published in 2012 after being rejected by multiple publishers, the book became a massive cultural phenomenon following its June 2026 global adaptation into a 22-episode Netflix supernovela. The explosive story explores the deep complexities, secrets, and emotional wreckage of undercover polygamy in modern society. African societies have a long history of polygamy which still exists, although it is now mainly underground. Polygamy, specifically polygyny, where one man has multiple wives, is practiced by roughly 2% of the global population. It is highly localised, with the highest concentration occurring in the "polygamy belt" of West and Central Africa, alongside select parts of the Middle East and South Asia. It is also prevalent in Southern Africa, where Eswatini King Mswati III is the most prominent and leading polygamist with 16 wives, although some of them have died, quit or were divorced. According to biblical and historical accounts, King Solomon of ancient Israel had 700 wives and 300 concubines. The second Shah of Qajar Iran (1797–1834) is documented to have had more than 1 000 spouses. A controversial Islamic cleric from Bida, Nigeria, gained international attention in 2008 for having 86 wives. By the time of his passing in 2017, he reportedly had around 130 wives and 203 children. Within days of its release, the hit drama, The Polygamist, soared to the No.3 spot on Netflix worldwide, holding the No. 1 position in South Africa, Nigeria, Kenya, and several other countries across Africa, Europe, and the Caribbean. Premiered on June 12, 2026, the series explores themes of wealth, deception, and family dynamics, sparking viral debates across the continent and internationally. The dramatic film follows a wealthy businessman named Jonas Gomora (played by S'dumo Mtshali) and his public image as a family man when he was living as a closet polygamist. When he dies, Gomora's carefully hidden life of polygamy unravels, revealing a web of secret marriages, mistresses, and infidelity. The drama — which features other prominent stars like Gugu Gumede— centres on his social media influencer wife uncovering the deception. It is trending because the show has viewers and critics passionately debating the blurred lines between traditional polygamy and mere infidelity. It has sparked huge debate on polygamy, infidelity, patriarchy, domestic violence and absent fathers. Traditional polygamy requires consent and transparency, whereas the show's protagonist normalises deception and infidelity as part of his complicated life. The film has also caused a spike in reading the original source material - the book - across South Africa and Zimbabwe, among other countries. The Polygamist has South Africans from all walks of life talking and debating in animated and emotional ways. In this Newzroom Afrika interview, Arabile Gumede speaks to Nyathi, and Zuma-Ncube, the women who made it happen.
17:00

Zimbabwean-born author Sukoluhle "Sue" Nyathi is living a dream after a South African super-novella, The Polygamist, produced by Gugu Zuma-Ncube is dominating the screens locally and elsewhere. The Polygamist is based on the explosive 2012 debut novel by Nyathi who studied finance and investment at National University of Science & Technology in Bulawayo, Zimbabwe's second-largest city. It was produced by Zuma-Ncube, a South African producer, actress and daughter of former president Jacob Zuma and his ex-wife Nkosazana Dlamini-Zuma, a retired long-serving minister. Zuma-Ncube is daughter-in-law to Zimbabwean politician Welshman Ncube, a professor of law. She is married to Wesley Bongani Ncube. The Polygamist was directed by prominent Nigerian-born South African actor and writer best known for his role as Khaya Motene in the SABC 1 soapie Generations. Originally self-published in 2012 after being rejected by multiple publishers, the book became a massive cultural phenomenon following its June 2026 global adaptation into a 22-episode Netflix supernovela. The explosive story explores the deep complexities, secrets, and emotional wreckage of undercover polygamy in modern society. African societies have a long history of polygamy which still exists, although it is now mainly underground. Polygamy, specifically polygyny, where one man has multiple wives, is practiced by roughly 2% of the global population. It is highly localised, with the highest concentration occurring in the "polygamy belt" of West and Central Africa, alongside select parts of the Middle East and South Asia. It is also prevalent in Southern Africa, where Eswatini King Mswati III is the most prominent and leading polygamist with 16 wives, although some of them have died, quit or were divorced. According to biblical and historical accounts, King Solomon of ancient Israel had 700 wives and 300 concubines. The second Shah of Qajar Iran (1797–1834) is documented to have had more than 1 000 spouses. A controversial Islamic cleric from Bida, Nigeria, gained international attention in 2008 for having 86 wives. By the time of his passing in 2017, he reportedly had around 130 wives and 203 children. Within days of its release, the hit drama, The Polygamist, soared to the No.3 spot on Netflix worldwide, holding the No. 1 position in South Africa, Nigeria, Kenya, and several other countries across Africa, Europe, and the Caribbean. Premiered on June 12, 2026, the series explores themes of wealth, deception, and family dynamics, sparking viral debates across the continent and internationally. The dramatic film follows a wealthy businessman named Jonas Gomora (played by S'dumo Mtshali) and his public image as a family man when he was living as a closet polygamist. When he dies, Gomora's carefully hidden life of polygamy unravels, revealing a web of secret marriages, mistresses, and infidelity. The drama — which features other prominent stars like Gugu Gumede— centres on his social media influencer wife uncovering the deception. It is trending because the show has viewers and critics passionately debating the blurred lines between traditional polygamy and mere infidelity. It has sparked huge debate on polygamy, infidelity, patriarchy, domestic violence and absent fathers. Traditional polygamy requires consent and transparency, whereas the show's protagonist normalises deception and infidelity as part of his complicated life. The film has also caused a spike in reading the original source material - the book - across South Africa and Zimbabwe, among other countries. The Polygamist has South Africans from all walks of life talking and debating in animated and emotional ways. In this Newzroom Afrika interview, Arabile Gumede speaks to Nyathi, and Zuma-Ncube, the women who made it happen.

TheNewsHawks

86,193 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

just copy the prompt below and paste on Utopai the PAI agent turns it into script, create storyline, generate clips and edit all by itself prompt: High-energy 3D CGI animated comedy short, Pixar quality, ultra-detailed character animation, exaggerated physics, vibrant colors, warm orange kitchen lighting with glowing flames, bright daylight city streets, dynamic camera work with fast pans, tilts and dramatic angles, subtle motion blur on fast movements, comedic timing and expressions, upbeat energetic music with whooshes and impacts. **Main Character Casting Descriptions:** - **Pizza Chef - Jack (main actor in kitchen)**: Early 50s energetic male, messy silver hair, large prominent nose, thick expressive eyebrows, sharp intense eyes, fair skin with slight blush from heat. Wears white double-breasted chef jacket, wear white chef hat with text “el.cine” in front, gree neckerchief. Highly animated face — furrowed brows, focused squint, dramatic determination turning to exhaustion. - **Pizza Delivery Guy - Tom (main actor on street/scooter)**: Late teens/early 20s lanky male, long blue hair, huge expressive brown eyes, long nose, very animated facial expressions (surprise, determination, panic, relief). Wears white helmet with spinning yellow propeller on to, light blue leather with text el.cine at back, white pants, sneakers. Fast, exaggerated movements. - **Customer (final shot)**: Large, middle-aged stern woman, brown hair, heavy eyebrows, downturned mouth, wearing beige suit jacket, white shirt, dark trousers. Standing in doorway with impatient/annoyed expression. SHOT 1 (0:00–0:02) – Cinematic fast motion, dramatic low angle with subtle Dutch tilt and intense push-in: fast push from kitchen wide shot to close up on the Pizza Chef’s face in the bustling kitchen. He grips the large pepperoni pizza on a metal tray with raw, over-the-top determination — brows dramatically furrowed into deep angry V-shapes, eyes sharply narrowed with a fierce glint and slight crazy wideness at the edges, teeth gritted in heroic effort, dramatic sweat beads flying off his forehead. Bright orange flames explode upward from the pizza in the foreground with massive sparks and heat waves licking toward his face. Dynamic camera orbits left while pushing in for maximum tension, subtle motion blur on the flames. Background shows chaotic kitchen with stacked pizza boxes, glowing ovens, and flying embers. SHOT 2 (0:02–0:04) – Medium close-up, eye-level: Chef lifts the flaming pizza higher with both hands, leans forward, eyes wide with concentration as flames lick upward toward his face. SHOT 3 (0:04–0:06) – Medium shot, eye-level, dynamic pan: Chef dramatically spins the flaming pizza on the peel in a huge fiery arc above his head, left hand on forehead in dramatic pose, right arm extended. Flames trail in a perfect circle. SHOT 4 (0:06–0:08) – Low-angle dramatic shot looking up: Chef tosses the flaming pizza high into the air with both hands. The camera follows the spinning fiery pizza as it arcs toward the ceiling tiles. SHOT 5 (0:08–0:10) – Extreme low-angle on ceiling: The flaming pizza spins in a perfect circle of fire against the tiled ceiling, sparks flying. SHOT 6 (0:10–0:12) – Wide dynamic shot, low angle: Chef does a full acrobatic flip in mid-air, upside-down, catching the flaming pizza behind his back while still in the air. SHOT 7 (0:12–0:14) – Wide action shot, eye-level: Chef lands in a wide stance, spins the flaming pizza on one hand like a basketball, then dramatically throws it forward toward the open doorway with full body power, flames trailing, quick push in and follow the close up of the flying pizza in slow motion SHOT 8 (0:14–0:16) – Medium shot on street, eye-level: Pizza Delivery Guy stands outside the shop holding an empty pizza box, looking down at his watch with bored expression, propeller on helmet slowly spinning. SHOT 9 (0:16–0:18) – Medium close-up, eye-level: Chef (partially visible inside doorway) throws the flaming pepperoni pizza directly toward the Delivery Guy. Delivery Guy looks up with wide-eyed shock. SHOT 10 (0:18–0:20) – Medium shot, eye-level: slow motion, close up of the flaming pizza flies straight into the open pizza box held by the Delivery Guy. Flames whoosh past his face as he catches it perfectly. SHOT 11 (0:20–0:22) – Close-up on Delivery Guy’s face: His eyes go extremely wide in surprise, mouth open, propeller spinning faster, and talk excitedly SHOT 12 (0:22–0:24) – Extreme close-up on smartphone screen held in hand: Red digital timer clearly shows “00:30” counting down. SHOT 13 (0:24–0:26) – Close-up on Delivery Guy’s face: Expression changes from shock to intense determination — eyebrows lowered, mouth set in a smirk, eyes focused. SHOT 14 (0:26–0:50 end) – Wide tracking shot from behind, fast-paced: Delivery Guy jumps on his purple scooter and speeds away down the sunny city street, pizza box secured on the back. Camera follows as he weaves between cars, jumps over red-and-white construction barriers, rides up stairs, does rooftop jumps, and finally stops smoothly in front of a house. He turns with a confident smile as the stern Customer opens the door and stares at him and says with an angry tone “you are late” cut to Tom smiling awkwardly and scratch the back of his head, he takes the pizza from his back and suddenly he slide and fall down on the ground Cinematic 3D CGI animation style, highly exaggerated comedic action, perfect continuity of the flaming pizza and characters, dynamic camera movements exactly matching the original video’s pacing, framing, and energetic tone. Photorealistic 3D render quality, 1080p, 24fps.
0:25

just copy the prompt below and paste on Utopai the PAI agent turns it into script, create storyline, generate clips and edit all by itself prompt: High-energy 3D CGI animated comedy short, Pixar quality, ultra-detailed character animation, exaggerated physics, vibrant colors, warm orange kitchen lighting with glowing flames, bright daylight city streets, dynamic camera work with fast pans, tilts and dramatic angles, subtle motion blur on fast movements, comedic timing and expressions, upbeat energetic music with whooshes and impacts. **Main Character Casting Descriptions:** - **Pizza Chef - Jack (main actor in kitchen)**: Early 50s energetic male, messy silver hair, large prominent nose, thick expressive eyebrows, sharp intense eyes, fair skin with slight blush from heat. Wears white double-breasted chef jacket, wear white chef hat with text “el.cine” in front, gree neckerchief. Highly animated face — furrowed brows, focused squint, dramatic determination turning to exhaustion. - **Pizza Delivery Guy - Tom (main actor on street/scooter)**: Late teens/early 20s lanky male, long blue hair, huge expressive brown eyes, long nose, very animated facial expressions (surprise, determination, panic, relief). Wears white helmet with spinning yellow propeller on to, light blue leather with text el.cine at back, white pants, sneakers. Fast, exaggerated movements. - **Customer (final shot)**: Large, middle-aged stern woman, brown hair, heavy eyebrows, downturned mouth, wearing beige suit jacket, white shirt, dark trousers. Standing in doorway with impatient/annoyed expression. SHOT 1 (0:00–0:02) – Cinematic fast motion, dramatic low angle with subtle Dutch tilt and intense push-in: fast push from kitchen wide shot to close up on the Pizza Chef’s face in the bustling kitchen. He grips the large pepperoni pizza on a metal tray with raw, over-the-top determination — brows dramatically furrowed into deep angry V-shapes, eyes sharply narrowed with a fierce glint and slight crazy wideness at the edges, teeth gritted in heroic effort, dramatic sweat beads flying off his forehead. Bright orange flames explode upward from the pizza in the foreground with massive sparks and heat waves licking toward his face. Dynamic camera orbits left while pushing in for maximum tension, subtle motion blur on the flames. Background shows chaotic kitchen with stacked pizza boxes, glowing ovens, and flying embers. SHOT 2 (0:02–0:04) – Medium close-up, eye-level: Chef lifts the flaming pizza higher with both hands, leans forward, eyes wide with concentration as flames lick upward toward his face. SHOT 3 (0:04–0:06) – Medium shot, eye-level, dynamic pan: Chef dramatically spins the flaming pizza on the peel in a huge fiery arc above his head, left hand on forehead in dramatic pose, right arm extended. Flames trail in a perfect circle. SHOT 4 (0:06–0:08) – Low-angle dramatic shot looking up: Chef tosses the flaming pizza high into the air with both hands. The camera follows the spinning fiery pizza as it arcs toward the ceiling tiles. SHOT 5 (0:08–0:10) – Extreme low-angle on ceiling: The flaming pizza spins in a perfect circle of fire against the tiled ceiling, sparks flying. SHOT 6 (0:10–0:12) – Wide dynamic shot, low angle: Chef does a full acrobatic flip in mid-air, upside-down, catching the flaming pizza behind his back while still in the air. SHOT 7 (0:12–0:14) – Wide action shot, eye-level: Chef lands in a wide stance, spins the flaming pizza on one hand like a basketball, then dramatically throws it forward toward the open doorway with full body power, flames trailing, quick push in and follow the close up of the flying pizza in slow motion SHOT 8 (0:14–0:16) – Medium shot on street, eye-level: Pizza Delivery Guy stands outside the shop holding an empty pizza box, looking down at his watch with bored expression, propeller on helmet slowly spinning. SHOT 9 (0:16–0:18) – Medium close-up, eye-level: Chef (partially visible inside doorway) throws the flaming pepperoni pizza directly toward the Delivery Guy. Delivery Guy looks up with wide-eyed shock. SHOT 10 (0:18–0:20) – Medium shot, eye-level: slow motion, close up of the flaming pizza flies straight into the open pizza box held by the Delivery Guy. Flames whoosh past his face as he catches it perfectly. SHOT 11 (0:20–0:22) – Close-up on Delivery Guy’s face: His eyes go extremely wide in surprise, mouth open, propeller spinning faster, and talk excitedly SHOT 12 (0:22–0:24) – Extreme close-up on smartphone screen held in hand: Red digital timer clearly shows “00:30” counting down. SHOT 13 (0:24–0:26) – Close-up on Delivery Guy’s face: Expression changes from shock to intense determination — eyebrows lowered, mouth set in a smirk, eyes focused. SHOT 14 (0:26–0:50 end) – Wide tracking shot from behind, fast-paced: Delivery Guy jumps on his purple scooter and speeds away down the sunny city street, pizza box secured on the back. Camera follows as he weaves between cars, jumps over red-and-white construction barriers, rides up stairs, does rooftop jumps, and finally stops smoothly in front of a house. He turns with a confident smile as the stern Customer opens the door and stares at him and says with an angry tone “you are late” cut to Tom smiling awkwardly and scratch the back of his head, he takes the pizza from his back and suddenly he slide and fall down on the ground Cinematic 3D CGI animation style, highly exaggerated comedic action, perfect continuity of the flaming pizza and characters, dynamic camera movements exactly matching the original video’s pacing, framing, and energetic tone. Photorealistic 3D render quality, 1080p, 24fps.

el.cine

12,990 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

Elon Musk just told lenders he's paying back $17.5 BILLION in debt across X and xAI. Including $3 billion in high-yield bonds being redeemed early at 117 cents on the dollar. NOBODY knows where the money is coming from. And nobody seems to care. Let me explain why you should: Morgan Stanley has been calling existing lenders and telling them everything gets repaid in full. The X debt from the Twitter buyout. The xAI bonds from June. All of it. The bonds were structured to stay outstanding for at least 2 years. They're being called back less than a year later at a 17% premium. Bondholders are thrilled. Of course they are. They're getting paid above par on junk paper. But here's the part that should make you uncomfortable: xAI lost $1.46 billion in a single quarter last year. Burned through $7.8 billion in cash in the first 9 months of 2025. Revenue for the September quarter was $107 million. That's a company hemorrhaging roughly $1 billion a month. On a standalone basis, xAI exited 2025 at about a $500 million annualized revenue run rate. Even with optimistic projections, they might hit $2 billion in 2026. So where does $17.5 billion come from? xAI raised $20 billion in a Series E round in January. That's the most likely answer. Take the money investors gave you to build AI infrastructure and use a huge chunk of it to retire debt. But that's NOT a sign of strength. That's financial engineering. You raise $20 billion from investors who think they're funding the next frontier of artificial intelligence, then you turn around and use most of it to clean up the balance sheet before an IPO. Because that's what this is really about. SpaceX is targeting a confidential SEC filing as early as this month. IPO could come in June. Valuation targets exceed $1.75 trillion. The combined SpaceX-xAI entity currently carries about $18 billion in obligations. You can't take a $1.25 trillion company public with $18 billion in legacy debt from a money-losing AI startup and a social media platform that was acquired with leveraged buyout financing. So you nuke the debt. Clean the balance sheet. Present a simpler story to IPO investors. Smart? Absolutely. But let's be honest about what it actually is. SpaceX proper generated about $15 billion in revenue and $8 billion in profit in 2025. xAI generated roughly $250 million in six months and lost $2.5 billion doing it. At a $1.5 trillion IPO valuation, you're looking at roughly 94x trailing sales and 500x trailing earnings for the combined business. Those are not rational multiples. Those are lottery ticket multiples with better branding. And the $17.5 billion debt payoff doesn't change the underlying economics. It only changes the optics. xAI is still burning close to $1 billion a month. Grok still has a fraction of ChatGPT's market share. The revenue doesn't come close to justifying the infrastructure spend. What this reminds me of is the classic pre-IPO playbook taken to an extreme: Use private capital to dress up the financials, time the listing for maximum enthusiasm, and let public market investors hold the bag if execution falls short. The companies that need to clean house before going public are rarely the ones that reward you for buying on day one. My positioning hasn't changed. The AI infrastructure spending boom is real. But the returns aren't materializing for the companies actually deploying the technology. That gap between spending and results is where fortunes get destroyed. Stay skeptical. Stay disciplined. And remember: If the source of $17.5 billion in repayment capital is a mystery, it's a WARNING.
0:48

Elon Musk just told lenders he's paying back $17.5 BILLION in debt across X and xAI. Including $3 billion in high-yield bonds being redeemed early at 117 cents on the dollar. NOBODY knows where the money is coming from. And nobody seems to care. Let me explain why you should: Morgan Stanley has been calling existing lenders and telling them everything gets repaid in full. The X debt from the Twitter buyout. The xAI bonds from June. All of it. The bonds were structured to stay outstanding for at least 2 years. They're being called back less than a year later at a 17% premium. Bondholders are thrilled. Of course they are. They're getting paid above par on junk paper. But here's the part that should make you uncomfortable: xAI lost $1.46 billion in a single quarter last year. Burned through $7.8 billion in cash in the first 9 months of 2025. Revenue for the September quarter was $107 million. That's a company hemorrhaging roughly $1 billion a month. On a standalone basis, xAI exited 2025 at about a $500 million annualized revenue run rate. Even with optimistic projections, they might hit $2 billion in 2026. So where does $17.5 billion come from? xAI raised $20 billion in a Series E round in January. That's the most likely answer. Take the money investors gave you to build AI infrastructure and use a huge chunk of it to retire debt. But that's NOT a sign of strength. That's financial engineering. You raise $20 billion from investors who think they're funding the next frontier of artificial intelligence, then you turn around and use most of it to clean up the balance sheet before an IPO. Because that's what this is really about. SpaceX is targeting a confidential SEC filing as early as this month. IPO could come in June. Valuation targets exceed $1.75 trillion. The combined SpaceX-xAI entity currently carries about $18 billion in obligations. You can't take a $1.25 trillion company public with $18 billion in legacy debt from a money-losing AI startup and a social media platform that was acquired with leveraged buyout financing. So you nuke the debt. Clean the balance sheet. Present a simpler story to IPO investors. Smart? Absolutely. But let's be honest about what it actually is. SpaceX proper generated about $15 billion in revenue and $8 billion in profit in 2025. xAI generated roughly $250 million in six months and lost $2.5 billion doing it. At a $1.5 trillion IPO valuation, you're looking at roughly 94x trailing sales and 500x trailing earnings for the combined business. Those are not rational multiples. Those are lottery ticket multiples with better branding. And the $17.5 billion debt payoff doesn't change the underlying economics. It only changes the optics. xAI is still burning close to $1 billion a month. Grok still has a fraction of ChatGPT's market share. The revenue doesn't come close to justifying the infrastructure spend. What this reminds me of is the classic pre-IPO playbook taken to an extreme: Use private capital to dress up the financials, time the listing for maximum enthusiasm, and let public market investors hold the bag if execution falls short. The companies that need to clean house before going public are rarely the ones that reward you for buying on day one. My positioning hasn't changed. The AI infrastructure spending boom is real. But the returns aren't materializing for the companies actually deploying the technology. That gap between spending and results is where fortunes get destroyed. Stay skeptical. Stay disciplined. And remember: If the source of $17.5 billion in repayment capital is a mystery, it's a WARNING.

George Noble

471,839 Aufrufe • vor 6 Monaten

Eruption - Van Halen - Violin Cover by Nina D My journey to learn Eruption began a few years ago, when I only had access to a 5-string fretless violin. I learned a small bit of it, and quickly realized that I would need to compromise the octave range, and the finger tapping in order to perform it. There are a few covers out there of violinists doing just that, and they are very impressive. Anyone who knows me, knows that I did not want to do that. I wanted to sound like Eddie. Thus began my journey with the 7-string fretted violin. Pretty much the entire reason for having this instrument custom-made (thanks Wood Violins crew!) was to see if I could play Eruption. At the time of purchase, I wasn’t even sure if it would be physically possible to do the finger tapping, even with the new instrument. Upon its arrival, my first task was to learn how to play the darn thing- it’s like a completely different instrument, the neck is huge, I am tiny, and the low strings are super thick. (I also had to buy a special bow to properly play it). If your bow arm falters by a millimeter, you will hit the surrounding strings. Once I had this part somewhat down, I knew I had to dive into the hardest part right away- to answer the question, “but will it tap?” I began with transcribing this beast of a solo into notation. If you play guitar, and you want to learn how to play pretty much anything, you can go to YouTube and find slow note for note tutorials on EXACTLY how to do so. This doesn’t exist for trying to translate guitar things to a violin. You’re on your own. I tried it out with my normal rig. Pretty much dead sound. Nothing happening but noise. I had a few ideas for specialty pedals. Since you can’t really go to the store and try pedals any more, I bought one, it didn’t work, shipped it back, bought a different one, didn’t work, shipped it back, etc. ad nauseam. Months went by. It seemed for every step forward I took in achieving this technique, I took two steps back with new problems. For months, my poor family listened to what sounded like a train wreck falling on top of a car wreck falling off the Empire State Building. Brody even said to me, “it ain’t gonna happen.” So I locked myself away until it did. I struggled and fought the limitations of the instrument. I had some hard practice days, but the best motivation for me is “it can’t be done.” It took a combination of newly learned left and right hand technique, played precisely, practiced slowly for clarity, FOREVER to even make the right sound. The spaces that you need to hit, quickly, on a fretted violin are much smaller than that of a guitar. I tweaked the effect chain and technique right up until the 11th hour on the very final day of doing this. One day near the end of it, I was practicing in the studio and Brody was taking a shower. When he got out, he said to me he thought I was playing the recording of Van Halen. That was my breakthrough day. I knew I was close. I haven’t worked this hard since my masters recital on classical violin. I’ve ripped up my fingers to shreds, they bled, they blistered. Eddie Van Halen was in a class all of his own. His sound, technique, rhythm, and musicality changed the game for all guitarists (and this electric violinist) that followed. I am a far better performer, a far better violinist, with a much larger range of abilities, thanks to the months (or years) I put into dissecting his style and taking the time to do this on a violin as close to how he did it (so effortlessly) on a guitar as possible. Thank you, EVH, for making so many of us better musicians. ❤️🤍🖤 Audio Mixing/programming, Drone footage and video editing, Fog jets and laser programming: Brody Dolyniuk Filming: Patrick Rivera Photography Lighting: Robert Brassard Custom Made Eddie Van Halen Outfit: 3x Emmy-nominated costume designer Diana Eden HMU: the MOBB Group Graphics: Derryl Rice #eruption #vanhalen #eddievanhalen #evh #cover #coversong #guitarsolo #violin
1:51

Eruption - Van Halen - Violin Cover by Nina D My journey to learn Eruption began a few years ago, when I only had access to a 5-string fretless violin. I learned a small bit of it, and quickly realized that I would need to compromise the octave range, and the finger tapping in order to perform it. There are a few covers out there of violinists doing just that, and they are very impressive. Anyone who knows me, knows that I did not want to do that. I wanted to sound like Eddie. Thus began my journey with the 7-string fretted violin. Pretty much the entire reason for having this instrument custom-made (thanks Wood Violins crew!) was to see if I could play Eruption. At the time of purchase, I wasn’t even sure if it would be physically possible to do the finger tapping, even with the new instrument. Upon its arrival, my first task was to learn how to play the darn thing- it’s like a completely different instrument, the neck is huge, I am tiny, and the low strings are super thick. (I also had to buy a special bow to properly play it). If your bow arm falters by a millimeter, you will hit the surrounding strings. Once I had this part somewhat down, I knew I had to dive into the hardest part right away- to answer the question, “but will it tap?” I began with transcribing this beast of a solo into notation. If you play guitar, and you want to learn how to play pretty much anything, you can go to YouTube and find slow note for note tutorials on EXACTLY how to do so. This doesn’t exist for trying to translate guitar things to a violin. You’re on your own. I tried it out with my normal rig. Pretty much dead sound. Nothing happening but noise. I had a few ideas for specialty pedals. Since you can’t really go to the store and try pedals any more, I bought one, it didn’t work, shipped it back, bought a different one, didn’t work, shipped it back, etc. ad nauseam. Months went by. It seemed for every step forward I took in achieving this technique, I took two steps back with new problems. For months, my poor family listened to what sounded like a train wreck falling on top of a car wreck falling off the Empire State Building. Brody even said to me, “it ain’t gonna happen.” So I locked myself away until it did. I struggled and fought the limitations of the instrument. I had some hard practice days, but the best motivation for me is “it can’t be done.” It took a combination of newly learned left and right hand technique, played precisely, practiced slowly for clarity, FOREVER to even make the right sound. The spaces that you need to hit, quickly, on a fretted violin are much smaller than that of a guitar. I tweaked the effect chain and technique right up until the 11th hour on the very final day of doing this. One day near the end of it, I was practicing in the studio and Brody was taking a shower. When he got out, he said to me he thought I was playing the recording of Van Halen. That was my breakthrough day. I knew I was close. I haven’t worked this hard since my masters recital on classical violin. I’ve ripped up my fingers to shreds, they bled, they blistered. Eddie Van Halen was in a class all of his own. His sound, technique, rhythm, and musicality changed the game for all guitarists (and this electric violinist) that followed. I am a far better performer, a far better violinist, with a much larger range of abilities, thanks to the months (or years) I put into dissecting his style and taking the time to do this on a violin as close to how he did it (so effortlessly) on a guitar as possible. Thank you, EVH, for making so many of us better musicians. ❤️🤍🖤 Audio Mixing/programming, Drone footage and video editing, Fog jets and laser programming: Brody Dolyniuk Filming: Patrick Rivera Photography Lighting: Robert Brassard Custom Made Eddie Van Halen Outfit: 3x Emmy-nominated costume designer Diana Eden HMU: the MOBB Group Graphics: Derryl Rice #eruption #vanhalen #eddievanhalen #evh #cover #coversong #guitarsolo #violin

Nina DiGregorio

404,392 Aufrufe • vor 2 Jahren

I’ve been using GPT-5.6 Sol internally for the past two months, I've spent probably 25+ billion tokens. Here’s my review and comparison to Fable 5: > Let's start with the analogy because everyone seems to be giving theirs - GPT-5.6 is likely the last version of the GPT-5 training run series. It's kind of like an athlete at their peak. Through years of experience in the game, they've become the most reliable player and has the highest game IQ. But, there's no more room to grow. Fable on the other hand, being essentially the first version of a new training run, is the first round draft pick rookie. Raw talent mixed with the energy only a young person would have results in some incredible plays we didn't think possible, but also mistakes due to lack of experience. But that rookie will only improve and likely will be better than the veteran ever was because it's a new game and a new era. > GPT-5.6 is genuinely better at long, sustained work. With /goal, I've had it running complex projects for days with almost no intervention. It built a Minecraft-style game, kept adding features and mobs after the core game worked, and only stopped because I stopped the run. I never felt as though I had to jump in and guide it back to the right path. > It keeps finding useful work when you give it a concrete finish line. I had it recreate Excel with a loop. It inspected the real desktop excel app with Computer Use, comparing that against its own build, and closing the gaps. I stopped it after six days after it had built an incredible amount of functionality. > It's faster than other models in two different ways. The raw generation speed is higher, something OpenAI has been putting effort into. But it also takes a shorter path to solutions. It wanders less, changes less code, and generally knows how to get things done directly. In daily use, it feels about 2-3x times faster than Fable. That's my impression, not a controlled benchmark. The difference is large enough that I notice it constantly. > It works well across a wide range of tasks. I use it for one-line edits, quick questions, browser chores, and multi-day builds without changing my prompting style. Speaking of browser control, its the best ever I've used. To the point where I actually use it often. If a task lives on a website, GPT-5.6 usually opens the browser and does it there instead of asking for an API key or forcing everything through the terminal. When I switched back to GPT-5.5, it went straight to the command line even when the browser was clearly the better tool. > And it can handle real browser work, not just toy demos. During a data import, I had it monitor Supabase and resize instances as the load changed. It stayed on the dashboard, adjusted capacity, and checked the result without an API or a custom script. > I also gave it a full Google Workspace migration. It moved Forward Future from to preserved the old aliases, and configured MX, SPF, and DKIM. Before a consequential save, it stopped, explained exactly what would change, and waited for confirmation. > The reasoning setting matters a lot. Light is good for questions and small edits. High and Extra High are the sweet spots for serious work. Ultra usually takes longer than the extra thinking is worth and burns tokens. > I love that 5.6 is split into 3 sizes. Not only can you control speed and cost that way, but you still also have the thinking effort setting for each of them. Very precise controls. I just wish Codex automatically routed my prompts for me. > Its personality is blunt and a little bland. Claude feels warmer and more natural to talk to. GPT-5.6 is more clinical, but I like that for work. It gives me enough explanation and rarely pads the answer. I usually have to ask Fable to explain things more simply and/or more concise. > Its front-end taste has improved, but the default is predictable. Left alone, it turns websites into PowerPoint decks with huge statements and hard section breaks. The good news is that it takes design direction well and can revise without destroying the parts that already work. > It still makes confident mistakes. I asked it to rebuild parts of a system, and it told me the job was finished. Later, I found out it wasn't. Bits of its internal process also leak into the answer occasionally. > Claude Fable is more naturally autonomous on large, open-ended projects. GPT-5.6 is easier to reach for. I don't need to invent a huge project to justify using it. It works just as well for a small edit or browser chore. > GPT-5.6 is also cheaper. Sol costs $5 per million input tokens and $30 per million output tokens. Fable costs $10 and $50. Cached input is cheaper too. Still, cost per finished task matters more than cost per token. > GPT-5.6 isn't the best at everything, and it still needs supervision. But it generates faster, wanders less, works at almost any scale, and wastes less of my time. It's the model I have the most confidence in to get the job done right the first time. I put together a full breakdown with all the tests, prompts, and examples on a site. You can read it here:
7:46

I’ve been using GPT-5.6 Sol internally for the past two months, I've spent probably 25+ billion tokens. Here’s my review and comparison to Fable 5: > Let's start with the analogy because everyone seems to be giving theirs - GPT-5.6 is likely the last version of the GPT-5 training run series. It's kind of like an athlete at their peak. Through years of experience in the game, they've become the most reliable player and has the highest game IQ. But, there's no more room to grow. Fable on the other hand, being essentially the first version of a new training run, is the first round draft pick rookie. Raw talent mixed with the energy only a young person would have results in some incredible plays we didn't think possible, but also mistakes due to lack of experience. But that rookie will only improve and likely will be better than the veteran ever was because it's a new game and a new era. > GPT-5.6 is genuinely better at long, sustained work. With /goal, I've had it running complex projects for days with almost no intervention. It built a Minecraft-style game, kept adding features and mobs after the core game worked, and only stopped because I stopped the run. I never felt as though I had to jump in and guide it back to the right path. > It keeps finding useful work when you give it a concrete finish line. I had it recreate Excel with a loop. It inspected the real desktop excel app with Computer Use, comparing that against its own build, and closing the gaps. I stopped it after six days after it had built an incredible amount of functionality. > It's faster than other models in two different ways. The raw generation speed is higher, something OpenAI has been putting effort into. But it also takes a shorter path to solutions. It wanders less, changes less code, and generally knows how to get things done directly. In daily use, it feels about 2-3x times faster than Fable. That's my impression, not a controlled benchmark. The difference is large enough that I notice it constantly. > It works well across a wide range of tasks. I use it for one-line edits, quick questions, browser chores, and multi-day builds without changing my prompting style. Speaking of browser control, its the best ever I've used. To the point where I actually use it often. If a task lives on a website, GPT-5.6 usually opens the browser and does it there instead of asking for an API key or forcing everything through the terminal. When I switched back to GPT-5.5, it went straight to the command line even when the browser was clearly the better tool. > And it can handle real browser work, not just toy demos. During a data import, I had it monitor Supabase and resize instances as the load changed. It stayed on the dashboard, adjusted capacity, and checked the result without an API or a custom script. > I also gave it a full Google Workspace migration. It moved Forward Future from to preserved the old aliases, and configured MX, SPF, and DKIM. Before a consequential save, it stopped, explained exactly what would change, and waited for confirmation. > The reasoning setting matters a lot. Light is good for questions and small edits. High and Extra High are the sweet spots for serious work. Ultra usually takes longer than the extra thinking is worth and burns tokens. > I love that 5.6 is split into 3 sizes. Not only can you control speed and cost that way, but you still also have the thinking effort setting for each of them. Very precise controls. I just wish Codex automatically routed my prompts for me. > Its personality is blunt and a little bland. Claude feels warmer and more natural to talk to. GPT-5.6 is more clinical, but I like that for work. It gives me enough explanation and rarely pads the answer. I usually have to ask Fable to explain things more simply and/or more concise. > Its front-end taste has improved, but the default is predictable. Left alone, it turns websites into PowerPoint decks with huge statements and hard section breaks. The good news is that it takes design direction well and can revise without destroying the parts that already work. > It still makes confident mistakes. I asked it to rebuild parts of a system, and it told me the job was finished. Later, I found out it wasn't. Bits of its internal process also leak into the answer occasionally. > Claude Fable is more naturally autonomous on large, open-ended projects. GPT-5.6 is easier to reach for. I don't need to invent a huge project to justify using it. It works just as well for a small edit or browser chore. > GPT-5.6 is also cheaper. Sol costs $5 per million input tokens and $30 per million output tokens. Fable costs $10 and $50. Cached input is cheaper too. Still, cost per finished task matters more than cost per token. > GPT-5.6 isn't the best at everything, and it still needs supervision. But it generates faster, wanders less, works at almost any scale, and wastes less of my time. It's the model I have the most confidence in to get the job done right the first time. I put together a full breakdown with all the tests, prompts, and examples on a site. You can read it here:

Matthew Berman

188,148 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

Again, this is a long post — but it needs to be. We warned you that Digital ID was never scrapped. We also warned that what was presented to you as the proposed ‘BritCard’ was only ever one token within a much larger Digital Wallet system. The confusion is baffling, because the plans were there in plain sight; in Labour Together proposals and government documents. You only had to read them. However, we also know this is policy laundering in action: global frameworks repackaged as national solutions to make the agenda feel local, inevitable, and benign. BritCard functioned as a red herring. It became the focus, allowing the wider infrastructure to advance with far less scrutiny. The right to work and right to rent checks (the alleged purpose of the BritCard) were never abandoned. Even the announcement itself made clear they would remain mandatory — routed through OneLogin. And this is the real foundation. OneLogin is the de facto Digital ID layer. Where many people are mistaken is in thinking these elements are separate — BritCard, the Government Wallet, the new app. They are not. OneLogin sits beneath them all. It is the authentication base, the system intended to host biometric identity verification and connect multiple government services in one place. To use the Wallet, you will need a OneLogin account. That is the entry gate. The stack is simple: OneLogin is the credential layer. The Wallet app is the credential container. Tokens — for work, rent, licences, services and more — sit inside it. And this stack will continue to expand. They insist the model is decentralised because data may sit across different departments. But when one state platform aggregates access, when one login gateway mediates participation, when one official app becomes the expected interface for everyday life, the distinction becomes semantic. Functionally, this is centralisation. The Wallet is the centralising force. The infrastructure already built — and still being built — reflects that reality. OneLogin itself is not new. It was launched in 2021. What is new (but was always the plan) is the scale of dependence now being engineered around it. The newly announced Government Wallet proposal shocked many, yet the direction of travel has been openly signalled for years. The plans were published. The international frameworks were discussed. My repeated statement “Know thine enemy and know their plan” was never a metaphor — it was advice. They promise the system will be voluntary. In practice, systems like this are enforced through exclusion, and coercion. Alternatives gradually disappear. The path of least resistance becomes the only realistic path. Convenience is the sales pitch. Efficiency is the branding. Forced compliance is the outcome. The risks are not theoretical. Centralised authentication platforms become high-value targets by design. Security testing has already demonstrated that the system could be compromised without detection, and internal whistleblowers have warned of serious cyber-risk before full rollout. This is a single point of failure dressed up as modernisation. And single points of failure can be broken. We have already said no to Digital ID once — with millions of signatures. Now we are presented with another consultation process. While appealing to government is often futile when policy is driven by larger agendas, people should still make their position known if they choose to. Participation exposes resistance. Silence is read as consent. Partake in the consultation if you wish by completing the survey: Alternatively, email: consultation@digitalid.cabinetoffice.gov.uk But understand this clearly: simply refusing to download an app will not be enough. Infrastructure of this scale embeds itself quietly and then becomes unavoidable. If this system is to be stopped, it must be made politically, socially and practically impossible to implement. We do not need it. We do not want it. And we must ensure it cannot be normalised. We must strike it down in its entirety. I’m sharing the video so you can hear what they’re saying in their own words. As expected, it’s wrapped in flowery language; ease, convenience, safety, choice. A frictionless future. It all sounds wonderful. Do not believe them. This was always about the Government Wallet, the all-encompassing Digital ID. The universal credential. The people tracking super-cookie for everyday life. The infrastructure they have been steadily building while insisting nothing fundamental was changing. They use reassuring words like sovereign. They promise it will be built in-house, that it won’t be outsourced, that it will protect you. Again — do not believe them. Governments do not construct systems of this scale without embedding dependency, leverage and control. I have been saying this since the launch of the Mass Non-Compliance campaign. The plans were never hidden. The documents were always there for anyone willing to read them. And of course, this is all tied to the rollout of facial recognition, social media bans for under-16s, VPN restrictions for under-18s through the Children’s Wellbeing and Schools Bill, the erosion of jury trials for non-indictable offences and cases where sentencing is 3 years or less, and the creeping deployment of AI and so-called ‘pre-crime’ tech (as they have snuck in the re-purposing digital ID photo’s for facial recognition mugshots) in our so-called ‘justice system.’ Piece by piece, the architecture is being laid. This is the blueprint for their digital gulag; a modern panopticon built to watch, predict, nudge and control. Again, know thine enemy and know their plan. Visit
3:07

Again, this is a long post — but it needs to be. We warned you that Digital ID was never scrapped. We also warned that what was presented to you as the proposed ‘BritCard’ was only ever one token within a much larger Digital Wallet system. The confusion is baffling, because the plans were there in plain sight; in Labour Together proposals and government documents. You only had to read them. However, we also know this is policy laundering in action: global frameworks repackaged as national solutions to make the agenda feel local, inevitable, and benign. BritCard functioned as a red herring. It became the focus, allowing the wider infrastructure to advance with far less scrutiny. The right to work and right to rent checks (the alleged purpose of the BritCard) were never abandoned. Even the announcement itself made clear they would remain mandatory — routed through OneLogin. And this is the real foundation. OneLogin is the de facto Digital ID layer. Where many people are mistaken is in thinking these elements are separate — BritCard, the Government Wallet, the new app. They are not. OneLogin sits beneath them all. It is the authentication base, the system intended to host biometric identity verification and connect multiple government services in one place. To use the Wallet, you will need a OneLogin account. That is the entry gate. The stack is simple: OneLogin is the credential layer. The Wallet app is the credential container. Tokens — for work, rent, licences, services and more — sit inside it. And this stack will continue to expand. They insist the model is decentralised because data may sit across different departments. But when one state platform aggregates access, when one login gateway mediates participation, when one official app becomes the expected interface for everyday life, the distinction becomes semantic. Functionally, this is centralisation. The Wallet is the centralising force. The infrastructure already built — and still being built — reflects that reality. OneLogin itself is not new. It was launched in 2021. What is new (but was always the plan) is the scale of dependence now being engineered around it. The newly announced Government Wallet proposal shocked many, yet the direction of travel has been openly signalled for years. The plans were published. The international frameworks were discussed. My repeated statement “Know thine enemy and know their plan” was never a metaphor — it was advice. They promise the system will be voluntary. In practice, systems like this are enforced through exclusion, and coercion. Alternatives gradually disappear. The path of least resistance becomes the only realistic path. Convenience is the sales pitch. Efficiency is the branding. Forced compliance is the outcome. The risks are not theoretical. Centralised authentication platforms become high-value targets by design. Security testing has already demonstrated that the system could be compromised without detection, and internal whistleblowers have warned of serious cyber-risk before full rollout. This is a single point of failure dressed up as modernisation. And single points of failure can be broken. We have already said no to Digital ID once — with millions of signatures. Now we are presented with another consultation process. While appealing to government is often futile when policy is driven by larger agendas, people should still make their position known if they choose to. Participation exposes resistance. Silence is read as consent. Partake in the consultation if you wish by completing the survey: Alternatively, email: [email protected] But understand this clearly: simply refusing to download an app will not be enough. Infrastructure of this scale embeds itself quietly and then becomes unavoidable. If this system is to be stopped, it must be made politically, socially and practically impossible to implement. We do not need it. We do not want it. And we must ensure it cannot be normalised. We must strike it down in its entirety. I’m sharing the video so you can hear what they’re saying in their own words. As expected, it’s wrapped in flowery language; ease, convenience, safety, choice. A frictionless future. It all sounds wonderful. Do not believe them. This was always about the Government Wallet, the all-encompassing Digital ID. The universal credential. The people tracking super-cookie for everyday life. The infrastructure they have been steadily building while insisting nothing fundamental was changing. They use reassuring words like sovereign. They promise it will be built in-house, that it won’t be outsourced, that it will protect you. Again — do not believe them. Governments do not construct systems of this scale without embedding dependency, leverage and control. I have been saying this since the launch of the Mass Non-Compliance campaign. The plans were never hidden. The documents were always there for anyone willing to read them. And of course, this is all tied to the rollout of facial recognition, social media bans for under-16s, VPN restrictions for under-18s through the Children’s Wellbeing and Schools Bill, the erosion of jury trials for non-indictable offences and cases where sentencing is 3 years or less, and the creeping deployment of AI and so-called ‘pre-crime’ tech (as they have snuck in the re-purposing digital ID photo’s for facial recognition mugshots) in our so-called ‘justice system.’ Piece by piece, the architecture is being laid. This is the blueprint for their digital gulag; a modern panopticon built to watch, predict, nudge and control. Again, know thine enemy and know their plan. Visit

Fiona Rose Diamond

16,689 Aufrufe • vor 6 Monaten

I’ve spent 2 hours combing through over 160 charts. Here are 40 stock charts you need to watch in the next 5 days! The market is still consolidating, but the tone shifted a bit last week. SPX failed to break out and closed near the weekly lows. QQQ and semiconductors weakened. Software is trying to stabilize, while earnings from names like $TSLA, $GOOGL, $IBM, and $INTC will likely determine where we go next. Here’s the watchlist and recording (audio cuts out after 20 min): $SPX: SPX attempted to break above both the weekly high and the upper trend line but couldn’t hold it. Buyers ran out of momentum and sellers stepped in, leaving us with a weekly close near the lows. While that’s a short-term negative, the bigger trend hasn’t broken. We’re still trading inside a two-month triangle after a strong advance. 7400 remains the key level I’m watching. Lose that and 7235 becomes a realistic target. Recover 7500 and the 50-day moving average, and I’d start looking for another push higher. $QQQ: Tech had one of the weaker weeks. QQQ is now below the 9, 20 and 50-day moving averages, and those averages are beginning to roll over, which is an early warning sign that momentum is fading. I’d keep a close eye on 685. If that level fails, the next meaningful support doesn’t come in until around 640. $IWM: Small caps continue holding above the 50-day moving average, which is constructive relative to QQQ, but the chart is still trapped inside a broad range. Until we reclaim 300, I don’t see a high-conviction setup here. $IGV: Software has cooled off after being one of the stronger groups a few weeks ago. The ETF remains below the 200-day moving average and continues to struggle there. Some individual software names still look attractive, but I’d like to see IGV reclaim 95-96 before becoming more aggressive. $SMH: Semiconductors spent another week under pressure but did manage to defend the 555 area on Friday. This group is sitting at a very important inflection point. If buyers can build on Friday’s bounce, we could start seeing leadership return. If not, this pullback could continue. $BTC: Bitcoin continues drifting sideways without much conviction. It’s holding the 58K-60K region, but there’s still no catalyst or technical confirmation suggesting buyers are ready to take control. For now, it’s simply range-bound. $AAPL: Apple continues to be one of the strongest charts in the market. Three straight weekly gains have brought it right back to all-time highs after fully recovering from the post-WWDC weakness. It has quietly become one of the market leaders again. Above 335, I’d look for continuation toward 350-360. $MSFT: Microsoft briefly reclaimed the 50-day moving average before giving it back. The chart isn’t broken, but it hasn’t shown the same relative strength as Apple or Meta. 400 remains the level I’d like to see recovered before getting more constructive. $GOOGL: Google remains below its key moving averages after the Gemini-related headlines earlier in the week. Friday was a better session relative to the market, but the chart still needs time to repair itself before offering a clean long setup. $META: Buyers stepped in exactly where they needed to, defending both the 200-day moving average and prior support. That reversal keeps the chart constructive despite the recent volatility. Above 650-652, I think Meta has a good chance of working back toward the highs. $TSLA: Tesla continues to be one of the weaker mega caps heading into earnings. The price action has been choppy, momentum is fading, and the chart lacks a clear trend. Below 368 could accelerate another leg lower. For now, I’d rather wait for earnings than force a trade. $AMZN: Amazon briefly reclaimed the 50-day moving average before giving the move back. It’s another chart that’s trying to stabilize but hasn’t earned my confidence yet. A sustained move back above the 50-day would improve the outlook. $NFLX: Netflix sold off after earnings and is now sitting at an important long-term support area around 70. That’s the level that matters. If buyers can reclaim 70, and especially 75-76, this quickly turns into an attractive failed-breakdown setup with room to recover. $NVDA: Friday looked ugly initially, but buyers defended both the psychological 200 level and the 200-day moving average. That’s exactly where you want institutions stepping in. Above 207, I’d look for a move toward 214-215, and only above there does a run back toward the highs become realistic. $BROS: Quietly building one of the cleaner bull flags on my watchlist. Friday’s strength was encouraging, and above 70 I think this one has room for another continuation move. $BE: After an incredible run, BE has finally started pulling back into support. This isn’t a chart I’d chase, but it’s one I’d monitor closely. If buyers defend 195, it could become another attractive continuation setup. $USO: Energy benefited from renewed geopolitical headlines and has started improving technically. A move above 125.85, along with reclaiming the 50-day moving average, would strengthen the bullish case. $NBIS: One of those AI names that can reverse very quickly once buyers return. Friday’s recovery was encouraging after several weak sessions. It remains firmly on my watchlist. $NET: Software hasn’t completely fallen apart, and NET continues to be one of the stronger names in the group. I’m watching 280-282 closely. If software finds its footing again, this is one of the first names I’d expect to move. $PANW: PANW continues holding up well despite broader market weakness and has respected support remarkably well. Earnings aren’t until August, leaving plenty of room for institutions to accumulate. Above 368, I’d expect momentum to build toward 400. $DELL: Dell continues holding its post-earnings gap extremely well despite weakness across AI infrastructure. That tells me institutions still want exposure. Above 410 would likely restart the uptrend. $LLY: Healthcare remains one of the stronger areas of the market, and Lilly continues showing leadership. Above 1200, I’d expect another leg higher as buyers continue rotating into defensive growth. $CRWD: CrowdStrike has done a great job holding above 200 despite the broader volatility. That’s constructive. Above 210, I’d look for buyers to regain momentum. $BAC: Earnings are behind it, removing one layer of uncertainty. As long as 60 holds, I think another breakout attempt remains very possible. $MU: Memory continues weakening after an exceptional run. Momentum has clearly faded. Below 800, I’d expect another wave of selling before buyers become interested again. $AMD: Despite the recent pullback in semiconductors, AMD continues to hold up better than many peers. The 500 area becomes an important decision point early in the week. $V: Visa printed an inside day after a healthy advance. Those often resolve with expansion. Watching 365 closely. $MA: Very similar setup to Visa. Healthy consolidation after a strong move higher. Worth watching if financials regain momentum. $SNDK: After an incredible run, the correction has been significant. The chart still needs time, but 1275-1300 becomes an important area to watch for signs that sellers are finally exhausting themselves. $ALAB: Another AI leader that’s finally cooling off after months of strength. Nothing wrong with the longer-term story, but technically it needs more time before becoming attractive again. $SPCX: SpaceX continues trading below its IPO price and has steadily deteriorated technically. August earnings become the next meaningful catalyst. Until then, I’d rather let the chart prove itself. $HOOD: Robinhood has now lost both 100 and the 200-day moving average. That’s meaningful technical damage. I’d wait for buyers to reclaim those levels before becoming interested again. $ISRG: One of the cleaner downside setups on my list. A break below Friday’s low around 345 could trigger another leg lower. Overall theme: Last week’s failed breakout shifted the short-term tone more cautious, but the bigger picture hasn’t changed. SPX remains inside a two-month consolidation, and earnings will likely determine whether we finally resolve higher or break lower. Semiconductors are trying to stabilize after a difficult stretch, software is mixed, and Wednesday becomes the biggest day of earnings season so far with reports from $TSLA, $GOOGL, $IBM, and $NOW, followed by $INTC on Thursday. $AAPL, $NVDA, $META, $PANW, $NET, $LLY, and $BROS are some of my favorite charts going into next week. If you like this, then like ❤️ it.
24:31

I’ve spent 2 hours combing through over 160 charts. Here are 40 stock charts you need to watch in the next 5 days! The market is still consolidating, but the tone shifted a bit last week. SPX failed to break out and closed near the weekly lows. QQQ and semiconductors weakened. Software is trying to stabilize, while earnings from names like $TSLA, $GOOGL, $IBM, and $INTC will likely determine where we go next. Here’s the watchlist and recording (audio cuts out after 20 min): $SPX: SPX attempted to break above both the weekly high and the upper trend line but couldn’t hold it. Buyers ran out of momentum and sellers stepped in, leaving us with a weekly close near the lows. While that’s a short-term negative, the bigger trend hasn’t broken. We’re still trading inside a two-month triangle after a strong advance. 7400 remains the key level I’m watching. Lose that and 7235 becomes a realistic target. Recover 7500 and the 50-day moving average, and I’d start looking for another push higher. $QQQ: Tech had one of the weaker weeks. QQQ is now below the 9, 20 and 50-day moving averages, and those averages are beginning to roll over, which is an early warning sign that momentum is fading. I’d keep a close eye on 685. If that level fails, the next meaningful support doesn’t come in until around 640. $IWM: Small caps continue holding above the 50-day moving average, which is constructive relative to QQQ, but the chart is still trapped inside a broad range. Until we reclaim 300, I don’t see a high-conviction setup here. $IGV: Software has cooled off after being one of the stronger groups a few weeks ago. The ETF remains below the 200-day moving average and continues to struggle there. Some individual software names still look attractive, but I’d like to see IGV reclaim 95-96 before becoming more aggressive. $SMH: Semiconductors spent another week under pressure but did manage to defend the 555 area on Friday. This group is sitting at a very important inflection point. If buyers can build on Friday’s bounce, we could start seeing leadership return. If not, this pullback could continue. $BTC: Bitcoin continues drifting sideways without much conviction. It’s holding the 58K-60K region, but there’s still no catalyst or technical confirmation suggesting buyers are ready to take control. For now, it’s simply range-bound. $AAPL: Apple continues to be one of the strongest charts in the market. Three straight weekly gains have brought it right back to all-time highs after fully recovering from the post-WWDC weakness. It has quietly become one of the market leaders again. Above 335, I’d look for continuation toward 350-360. $MSFT: Microsoft briefly reclaimed the 50-day moving average before giving it back. The chart isn’t broken, but it hasn’t shown the same relative strength as Apple or Meta. 400 remains the level I’d like to see recovered before getting more constructive. $GOOGL: Google remains below its key moving averages after the Gemini-related headlines earlier in the week. Friday was a better session relative to the market, but the chart still needs time to repair itself before offering a clean long setup. $META: Buyers stepped in exactly where they needed to, defending both the 200-day moving average and prior support. That reversal keeps the chart constructive despite the recent volatility. Above 650-652, I think Meta has a good chance of working back toward the highs. $TSLA: Tesla continues to be one of the weaker mega caps heading into earnings. The price action has been choppy, momentum is fading, and the chart lacks a clear trend. Below 368 could accelerate another leg lower. For now, I’d rather wait for earnings than force a trade. $AMZN: Amazon briefly reclaimed the 50-day moving average before giving the move back. It’s another chart that’s trying to stabilize but hasn’t earned my confidence yet. A sustained move back above the 50-day would improve the outlook. $NFLX: Netflix sold off after earnings and is now sitting at an important long-term support area around 70. That’s the level that matters. If buyers can reclaim 70, and especially 75-76, this quickly turns into an attractive failed-breakdown setup with room to recover. $NVDA: Friday looked ugly initially, but buyers defended both the psychological 200 level and the 200-day moving average. That’s exactly where you want institutions stepping in. Above 207, I’d look for a move toward 214-215, and only above there does a run back toward the highs become realistic. $BROS: Quietly building one of the cleaner bull flags on my watchlist. Friday’s strength was encouraging, and above 70 I think this one has room for another continuation move. $BE: After an incredible run, BE has finally started pulling back into support. This isn’t a chart I’d chase, but it’s one I’d monitor closely. If buyers defend 195, it could become another attractive continuation setup. $USO: Energy benefited from renewed geopolitical headlines and has started improving technically. A move above 125.85, along with reclaiming the 50-day moving average, would strengthen the bullish case. $NBIS: One of those AI names that can reverse very quickly once buyers return. Friday’s recovery was encouraging after several weak sessions. It remains firmly on my watchlist. $NET: Software hasn’t completely fallen apart, and NET continues to be one of the stronger names in the group. I’m watching 280-282 closely. If software finds its footing again, this is one of the first names I’d expect to move. $PANW: PANW continues holding up well despite broader market weakness and has respected support remarkably well. Earnings aren’t until August, leaving plenty of room for institutions to accumulate. Above 368, I’d expect momentum to build toward 400. $DELL: Dell continues holding its post-earnings gap extremely well despite weakness across AI infrastructure. That tells me institutions still want exposure. Above 410 would likely restart the uptrend. $LLY: Healthcare remains one of the stronger areas of the market, and Lilly continues showing leadership. Above 1200, I’d expect another leg higher as buyers continue rotating into defensive growth. $CRWD: CrowdStrike has done a great job holding above 200 despite the broader volatility. That’s constructive. Above 210, I’d look for buyers to regain momentum. $BAC: Earnings are behind it, removing one layer of uncertainty. As long as 60 holds, I think another breakout attempt remains very possible. $MU: Memory continues weakening after an exceptional run. Momentum has clearly faded. Below 800, I’d expect another wave of selling before buyers become interested again. $AMD: Despite the recent pullback in semiconductors, AMD continues to hold up better than many peers. The 500 area becomes an important decision point early in the week. $V: Visa printed an inside day after a healthy advance. Those often resolve with expansion. Watching 365 closely. $MA: Very similar setup to Visa. Healthy consolidation after a strong move higher. Worth watching if financials regain momentum. $SNDK: After an incredible run, the correction has been significant. The chart still needs time, but 1275-1300 becomes an important area to watch for signs that sellers are finally exhausting themselves. $ALAB: Another AI leader that’s finally cooling off after months of strength. Nothing wrong with the longer-term story, but technically it needs more time before becoming attractive again. $SPCX: SpaceX continues trading below its IPO price and has steadily deteriorated technically. August earnings become the next meaningful catalyst. Until then, I’d rather let the chart prove itself. $HOOD: Robinhood has now lost both 100 and the 200-day moving average. That’s meaningful technical damage. I’d wait for buyers to reclaim those levels before becoming interested again. $ISRG: One of the cleaner downside setups on my list. A break below Friday’s low around 345 could trigger another leg lower. Overall theme: Last week’s failed breakout shifted the short-term tone more cautious, but the bigger picture hasn’t changed. SPX remains inside a two-month consolidation, and earnings will likely determine whether we finally resolve higher or break lower. Semiconductors are trying to stabilize after a difficult stretch, software is mixed, and Wednesday becomes the biggest day of earnings season so far with reports from $TSLA, $GOOGL, $IBM, and $NOW, followed by $INTC on Thursday. $AAPL, $NVDA, $META, $PANW, $NET, $LLY, and $BROS are some of my favorite charts going into next week. If you like this, then like ❤️ it.

spacemonkey

25,744 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten