Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Zur Startseite

No bad words. No hierarchy. Only respect. An assistant director shares a powerful Raaj Kamal Films International behind-the-scenes moment, where #KamalHaasan sir’s work culture speaks louder than any dialogue. - Assistant director #Ramnath👏 #UttamaVillain #ThoongaaVanam #RaajKamalFilmsInternational

0 Kommentare

Keine Kommentare verfügbar

Kommentare vom Original-Post werden hier angezeigt

Ähnliche Videos

Roberto Rossellini on the reason he chose George Sanders for "Journey to Italy" (1954) & the advice he gave him during filming: "Interviewer: What relationship do you have with the actors? Rossellini: It’s a question of the individual personality. George Sanders would cry all the way through the film. He moaned terribly and I used to say to him, “What are you getting so depressed about, at the worst you’ll have made one more bad film—nothing worse than that can happen. I don’t see anything to cry about in that, there’s no cause for despair. We’ve all made good films and bad films. So we’ll make another bad one. What can you do? There’s no need to tear your hair out or ki!! yourself over it.” No, to be frank, you have to make them work for you. You can use anything, even an actor’s temper. You see something, in a moment of temper, a certain expression or attitude, that you can use, and so of course you use it. I don’t in the least believe in collective art, I can’t believe in it. I don’t claim to be an artist but I’ve always hoped that my work is artistically acceptable. It’s no good descending to compromises: you have to get somewhere at any cost, at the cost of quarrels, fights, bad moods, insults, and coaxing, anything you think will work. Interviewer: Why did you choose Sanders? Rossellini: Don’t you think he was obvious for the part? It was his bad moods rather than his own personality that suited the character in the film." ("My Method - Writings and Interviews", Roberto Rossellini, Edited by Adriano Aprà, 1987) P.S: Remembering the great British actor, George Sanders, on his 120th birthday!

DepressedBergman

17,737 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

The Laptop Test. Why most remote jobs will disappear within 10 years. Insights from an interview with Shane Legg, cofounder of Google DeepMind. A short clip, but it lands like a brick. Legg lays out a framework that quietly nukes a huge chunk of today’s job market. •The Laptop Test If your job can be done fully remote with just a laptop, screen, and internet, it’s pure cognitive labor. No physical presence. No embodiment. That is exactly the domain advanced AI will dominate. Conclusion: most remote, computer-only jobs are on a countdown. •Yes, humans still matter but less than we think Some digital work survives because people follow people. Influencers, creators, personalities. The value isn’t the task, it’s the human behind it. But that’s the exception, not the rule. •Experts are behind the curve Legg points out something uncomfortable: many academics and professionals seriously underestimate AGI. They judge AI by outdated capabilities, not by where it is actually heading. The pace of progress is faster than their mental models. •Why “normal people” often get it first Non-experts look at AI and think: it writes better, knows more, speaks more languages, solves more problems than I do. Why wouldn’t it replace jobs? Experts, meanwhile, assume their niche is too special. That belief is often more ego than evidence. Bottom line: If your income depends on work that lives entirely on a screen, you are not competing with AI yet, but you are on borrowed time. The question is no longer if, but how society adapts when this becomes obvious.

VraserX e/acc

236,016 Aufrufe • vor 8 Monaten

We're excited to launch 🚀Airtable AI Assistant 🚀 today, along with AI document analysis and AI web research capabilities! Airtable was founded 12 years ago with the mission of democratizing software creation. Our pioneering innovation was to distill app-building concepts (data, logic, interface) into intuitive visual components, like a no-code lego kit for app building. At the time, we speculated that someday, maybe AI would get good enough to enable conversational app building–talking to an expert AI app builder–and be a huge unlock, making app building even more accessible. We’re now at that point. While surprisingly impressive text generation and manipulation by LLMs was the breakthrough of the 2022 ChatGPT moment, the emergence of surprisingly impressive reasoning capability from LLMs is the breakthrough of 2025. This is unlocking more autonomous agentic experiences, and generating apps and code is the first killer use case (Cursor, @windsurf, Devin, v0, bolt.new, Replit ⠕ Agent to name a few). But for the large class of non-technical builders, a different approach is needed. When AI generates apps with code, rather than no-code building blocks, it requires a developer to fully understand how they work – and to verify them for hidden mistakes that would be tricky/impossible to debug by interface inspection alone (it may look right, but what is the data model business logic is flawed in non-obvious ways?). Airtable Assistant is an agent that can build and modify Airtable apps through conversation, changing schemas, adding automations, and designing interfaces. You can ask it to do things like: –“Research every conference attendee in this base” to have the Assistant immediately spin up an army of researchers that pull in background information for your attendees –“Analyze each contract to identify key risks they pose to my business” to have the Assistant add an AI field that runs an analysis at scale for each contract you’ve signed. Airtable Assistant can also answer questions about the data in your apps, like prompts as advanced as: –“I'm about to meet Jane Smith at Zelos, read all of their recent sales call transcripts and tell me how far along they are in their implementation and if they’re dealing with any issues” –“What are the most common risk factors in our contracts? Are there any changes to our default posture we might consider?” Credit to Mike Krieger for introducing us to the concept of low floor and high ceiling in HCI many years ago, which has become part of our internal lexicon for thinking about product improvements. Assistant dramatically lowers the floor to building apps, including more sophisticated ones, by helping human builders translate their business requirements into the schema design, logic, and interfaces required to deliver on the use case. In addition to launching Airtable Assistant today, we’re also releasing the capability to deploy thousands of AI web researchers, and AI document analysts, to continuously work on the data in Airtable apps. You can do things like: –Pull strategy and value stories from every product requirement doc to draft launch and release messaging –Monitor all brand mentions across digital channels to measure campaign impact –Create an automatically updating competitive intelligence dossier with the latest news and messaging from every competitor in your industry Check it out 👇

Howie Liu

2,313,379 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

This Chinese developer runs 9 agents on Claude Code under a GPT-5.5 orchestrator and they close 500 client tasks a month without a single assistant. His client work is closed without him, on a single laptop and only three subscriptions. The entire system lives on one MacBook Pro M4 with 128 GB of memory and subscriptions to Claude Code and GPT-5.5 cost him approximately $300 a month. There is no CRM, no team, no office only a terminal window with 9 parallel streams. The orchestrator works with a simple system prompt: «You are the orchestrator of a client inbox. Classify every incoming email into 4 categories: code, content, analysis, communication. Delegate to the corresponding worker agent. When the result is ready, check it for completeness, send it to the client on my behalf, and mark the task as closed. Do not ask clarifying questions.» And the orchestrator checks the inbox every 30 seconds, classifies fresh emails, and distributes them to 9 worker agents on Claude Code, each of whom is responsible for their own class of tasks. Here is an example of how one of them closes a request to refactor a client's auth module: Task: refactor user-auth module Broke the monolith into 3 files by responsibilities Added unit tests, coverage increased to 87% Renamed 4 functions to camelCase according to the style guide PR is ready for review, link below» And so about 50 cycles a day. By noon 25 tasks are closed, by dinner 50, and by the end of the month 500. On average, it takes about 7 minutes from the appearance of an email in the inbox to sending the result to the client. This is more than what a live team of 6 developers, copywriters and analysts working 8 hours a day closes. This is no longer an agency. This is a workstation where an orchestrator replaces a manager, and 9 worker agents replace the staff. The pipeline goes from inbox to closing 500 times a month without human participation at any step.

Blaze

29,917 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten