Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

Go Home

no because duolingo being the main sponsor would make so much sense, their promo is actually funny and it's connected with eurovision because I feel like we all at some point started learning a new language on duolingo because of our favourite eurovision act

47,527 views • 1 year ago •via X (Twitter)

10 Comments

kinga🇸🇪's profile picture
kinga🇸🇪1 year ago

(i totally just started learning Swedish on duolingo)

Dew's profile picture
Dew1 year ago

the only con is that theyve recently been trying to push for AI suff...

Sinyua | ✨ I will sing no requiem ✨'s profile picture
Sinyua | ✨ I will sing no requiem ✨1 year ago

I would so have been on this page prior to duolingo laying off most of their human staff in favour of AI and making their product a whole lot worse. 🙃

Landon 🇨🇦🎗️'s profile picture
Landon 🇨🇦🎗️1 year ago

And would perfectly align with the EBU’s insistence on using AI when humans do the job perfectly!

Mordred - 🔞's profile picture
Mordred - 🔞1 year ago

They just became an AI first company

May :)'s profile picture
May :)1 year ago

Are we just gonna pretend to ignore that they stated they’re becoming an AI first company or…..

Danyonetta | 🇵🇱🇦🇱🇩🇰's profile picture
Danyonetta | 🇵🇱🇦🇱🇩🇰1 year ago

But clearly Duolingo is already getting the advertisement they need but without having to pay the EBU to sponsor the event, would it really benefit them much more? Sure they’re a good partner brand because they link but as a main sponsor i don’t think they would benefit

Antonio🇭🇰🇬🇧's profile picture
Antonio🇭🇰🇬🇧1 year ago

If winner is not a language on Duolingo it gets added!!

: )'s profile picture
: )1 year ago

fully supporting this !!!

James Maskell's profile picture
James Maskell1 year ago

I did have a thought to start to learn the winners language for this contest. I did German as a kid however, and Im still haunted 20 years on 😆

Related Videos

People do this kind of thing when they feel they are experiencing reality at a high frame rate. It does not feel risky to hold a laptop by a corner if you feel like you have an “agency frame” every half second. It feels risky if you have an “agency frame” every 60 seconds. You’d be betting that a hand you do not have control over for 60 seconds will keep gripping. Our conscious frame rate can vary dramatically throughout the day, and it’s hard to perceive the difference because we can only sample ourselves at our conscious frame rate, we can’t oversample ourselves. People drunk drive because they fail to perceive their slower frame rate. Their frame rate feels normal because it matches their sample rate. But we do get a subtle sense of when we’re “switched on”. Everything seems to go easier, everything feels less risky and more easy to correct. A lot of people toward the autistic side of the spectrum are experiencing reality very granularly with a “high agency frame rate”. This is why their social interactions can seem overly forced and awkward, they can be bad at dancing, etc—because they are exerting conscious control over their body and language at very tight intervals—you get a sense that they are extremely “self aware” and not “letting go”. “Letting go” in the social sense is actually about reducing your agency frame rate. That’s why alcohol is good for socializing and bad for driving. With a reduced agency frame rate our speech and body language feels more natural, less forced. More like we are flowing with the social group mind rather than being an island of constant awkward agency.

Scott Stevenson

1,808,278 views • 7 months ago