Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Zur Startseite

No classes. No restrictions. Master sword gestures, become a master herbalist, cook legendary meals, or just wander and fish. Every playstyle works in Wigmund’s open world. Real freedom — made by two devs who actually care. #IndieRPG #OpenWorldRPG #IndieGame

33,060 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten •via X (Twitter)

9 Kommentare

Profilbild von Junkwars
Junkwarsvor 3 Monaten

The world os so vibrant and relaxing... Looks good!

Profilbild von Vyrnt
Vyrntvor 3 Monaten

What the hack is this graphics crazyyy!

Profilbild von T I T A N 屮
T I T A N 屮vor 3 Monaten

$3 on steam atm for anyone curious

Profilbild von MR. E MONEYBAGGS
MR. E MONEYBAGGSvor 3 Monaten

game world looks beautiful

Profilbild von Jemmyt Reloaded
Jemmyt Reloadedvor 3 Monaten

Played the demo, 3 years ago. Bought the game afterwards. Didn’t take the time to play the full game yet. Sorry.

Profilbild von TYLER
TYLERvor 3 Monaten

Bro this looks sooooo good. When is this releasing??

Profilbild von Wigmund / On Steam
Wigmund / On Steamvor 3 Monaten

@LastLightStd There's a demo on steam if interested. Link in our profile.

Profilbild von TheTravelerDev🍃
TheTravelerDev🍃vor 3 Monaten

Looks super in depth! Do you each bring different talents or each dev just does whatever is next on the todo list?

Profilbild von Fenharell
Fenharellvor 3 Monaten

2022 year of release and only english language supported. why?

Ähnliche Videos

Drake doesn’t own his music” That’s false. • Pre-2018: UMG owns the bulk of the masters, but Drake still owns publishing and retains contractual/master interests. That’s real ownership, not zero. • Post-2018: Drake owns or co-owns his masters. UMG acts as a licensed distributor, not an absolute owner. That’s why Drake’s company has legal standing in court to claim streaming and licensing harm. If he “didn’t own his music,” he wouldn’t. “Contractual / master interests” — plain English It means Drake has legally enforceable rights tied to the master recordings, even if he does not own 100% of them outright. Let’s break it down clearly. ⸻ 1️⃣ “Master interests” This refers to any ownership stake or control connected to the sound recordings (the masters). You do not need to own 100% of a master to have a master interest. Examples of master interests: •Partial ownership (co-ownership) •Beneficial ownership (economic interest) •Reversionary ownership (ownership that returns after a term) •Approval or veto rights over certain uses •A defined share of licensing revenue So when we say Drake has master interests, it means: 👉 he has real, recognized rights in the recordings themselves, not just a paycheck. ⸻ 2️⃣ “Contractual interests” This means those rights exist because of contracts, even if the copyright registration lists another owner. Contracts can grant an artist: •Guaranteed revenue participation tied to the master •Audit rights •Control over licensing, sync, or exclusivity •Restrictions on how recordings are exploited •Rights that expand or revert over time In other words: •UMG may appear as the owner on paper •But Drake’s contracts limit what UMG can do and guarantee Drake’s stake That’s still ownership in the legal sense, even if it’s not exclusive. ⸻ 3️⃣ Why this matters legally (and in court) Courts don’t ask: “Who owns 100%?” They ask: “Who has ownership standing?” If Drake had: •only artist royalties, no ownership •no contractual master rights He could not claim economic harm tied to streaming or licensing. The fact that his company can assert harm means: ✅ he holds master-level contractual interests, not just royalties. ⸻ 4️⃣ Simple analogy (no music jargon) Think of real estate: •UMG = owns most of the building •Drake = owns a legally protected share + has rights over how it’s used UMG can’t act like Drake isn’t an owner just because they own more square footage. ⸻ ✅ Final, clean definition “Contractual/master interests” means: Drake has legally enforceable rights and economic ownership tied directly to the master recordings, even if he does not own 100% of them outright. That’s why saying “Drake owns nothing pre-2018” is incorrect.

stevonaj🧊

77,000 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten