Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

Go Home

NO EXPERT, correct if wrong. *Gold by Golding!* "Bracket" BDY, vs. dbls, but vs. 11 Pers (Pro Twin), becomes "Cap". Gameplan "Cone" single WR 1st pic = Cougar 2x2 2nd pic = 3x1 Clip - Game plan FS rules - Can "poach" #3 to 1st vert with FS or...

32,298 views • 5 months ago •via X (Twitter)

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

watched a guy flexing his 80% WR on Draven with a Lulu support. "look at this winrate bro, i'm cracked" he's not cracked. he's carried. here's the uncomfortable truth about e-dating in League: the FAKE couples are running Draven/Lulu or Twitch/Yuumi. the REAL ones are running Xayah/Rakan. and there's a massive skill gap between the two. DRAVEN + LULU (THE EASY COUPLE): ADC just Q's and auto attacks. Lulu does the rest. Draven gets caught? Lulu E and he's fine. Draven needs to kite? Lulu W speeds him up. Draven all-ins and int's? Lulu R makes him unkillable. this isn't synergy. this is life support. Draven doesn't have to position. doesn't have to know when to fight. doesn't have to respect cooldowns. because Lulu will bail him out. that 80% WR? it's not Draven being good. it's Lulu making a dogshit player look presentable. watch that Draven go solo queue: suddenly 48% WR. because without the mechanical babysitter, his actual gameplay is EXPOSED. XAYAH + RAKAN (THE REAL COUPLE): both players have to be GOOD. Xayah times her feathers. Rakan times his engage. they have to sync perfectly or both die. Rakan goes in alone? He's deleted in 0.5 seconds. Xayah doesn't follow? Rakan just inted the game. Xayah ults wrong? Rakan can't save her. Rakan W misses? The whole plan falls apart. this is actual coordination. this is actual partnership. there's zero room for one player to be carried. edaters that will never meet irl: "we run Draven/Lulu, 80% WR, we're unstoppable!" (one is smurfing, one is hardstuck, the matchup is just broken) life long couple: "we run Xayah/Rakan, 58% WR" (both players are actually cracked, both have to execute) the gap is VISIBLE with Xayah/Rakan. watched a "80% WR Draven" duo try to run Xayah/Rakan: suddenly they're 45% WR. why? because Lulu was hiding his terrible positioning. with Xayah/Rakan, there's no crutch. both players have to be GOOD. the Draven was getting kills because Lulu E gave him free trades. the Rakan has to actually know when to go in. has to actually time it. the Xayah has to know how to follow. has to position perfectly. no shields. no safety net. just skill. here's what separates real couples from fake ones: FAKE COUPLES: rely on one player's mechanics one person carries, one person scales for free if you remove the OP support, the ADC crumbles comfortable but FRAGILE REAL COUPLES: both players have to be good both have to execute or both fail climbing together actually means both are skilled same WR in duo AND solo queue (because they're actually good) coordinated but FLEXIBLE you almost never see 80% WR Draven/Lulu duos in Grandmaster. because at high elo, the mechanical support crutch gets EXPLOITED. enemies respect Xayah/Rakan coordination. enemies abuse Draven/Lulu by punishing the ADC's positioning (which Lulu usually covers up). here's the real flex: not 80% WR on Draven with support carrying you. that's easy. 58% WR on Xayah/Rakan where both of you have to be CRACKED. that means something. that means you didn't get carried. that means you had to actually coordinate. that means both of you are actually good. most e-daters won't do this because it's uncomfortable. it's easier to pick Twitch/Yuumi and coast. it's harder to pick Xayah/Rakan and actually prove you're both skilled. the real test of a relationship isn't how many shields you can spam. it's how perfectly you can coordinate when there's no safety net. Xayah/Rakan at 58% WR beats Draven/Lulu at 80% WR every single time. one is actual skill. one is a stat check that's being gamed. you know which one you and your duo actually are. study the saskio way

Tony Chau

124,005 views • 10 months ago

people always say, "why is your syndra build so weird"? (mandate + stormsurge + shadowflame + cryptbloom) it's so that I can go around 1shotting people like the lobby admin IN CHALLENGER while still having haste/speed for fights, without EVER having to rely on my teammates to make plays. with tier 3 sorcs buff next patch, my build will be even more OP. don't buy disgusting rocketbelt / blackfire for "more rotations" or "mobility" when you can get the job done in 1 rotation with so much mpen that you deal true damage. and if your enemies manage to survive, your 2nd rotation is still up super fast with mandate and they can't play the game. FULL BUILD ORDER: your first 2 items are ALWAYS imperial mandate and stormsurge, with sorcerer's shoes. The purchase order depends on matchup. can 1shot: go stormsurge first, with a faerie charm to proc JoaT can't 1shot: go mandate first for more E's. prioritize 3 amp tombs and faerie charm for mana / jack. 3rd item: always shadowflame. 4th item: cryptbloom default. You deal true damage to every1 in the game with this purchase, or VERY close to it. 4th item alternative: seeker's armguard -> cryptbloom, or upgrade to zhonya's if needed (vs zed,fizz,qiyana,etc.) 5th item: deathcap/zhonyas/banshees. Final Item Insight: if you bought zhonya's or banshees, chances are you don't have Deathcap in your build. Honestly, i make it this far in like 1% of games, because my build is EXTREMELY good at closing games out. But if this happens to you, just sell shadowflame or stormsurge for deathcap when you can afford it. I prefer to keep stormsurge if i need movespeed, otherwise if I have flash/ghost then I sell stormsurge and keep shadowflame. Alternatively, if you are GIGA rich, you can sell your boots for deathcap (you need summs or else u are too slow). Another possibility is selling mandate for Cosmic Drive for speed/durability, so your build could look like: DCAP, Shadowflame, Stormsurge, Cosmic Drive, Zhonyas, Cryptbloom (no boots) RUNES: In 90% of games, go Comet, Manaflow, Transcendence, Scorch, with Cashback, Jack of all Trades. Your first 2 items are cheap, getting full utilization of Cashback ASAP. In 10% of games, vs unkillable matchups (yasuo,ekko,galio,any tank), go First Strike, Cashback, Triple Tonic, Jack of All Trades, Manaflow, Transcendence. EXPERT RUNES: Swap out manaflow band for Axiom Arcanist. You need to be VERY good at mana management to take this greedy option. When you deal true damage, 12% increased R damage is A LOT. And I have noticed this rune singlehandedly get me kills and win me games I had no business winning where my team was 5-10k gold down, just because you can transcend Syndra's damage limits and 1v9. And no, I NEVER go oom after mandate is purchased since that's when your passive starts refunding a ton of mana. But before mandate, you might go oom if you use too many abilities without getting a Splinter stack out of it. Syndra is uniquely able to go this build because she has mana sustain, whereas every other mage doesn't. Abuse for free LP.

Strompest

490,441 views • 1 month ago

Yesterday, iVisionSR and BennoJr attempted to rob $1,262 from our tournament prizepool solely relying on the fact that no one else in the tournament spoke Dutch. Here's the breakdown of the leaderboard that we THOUGHT happened based on scores submitted 1. BennoJr, iVisionSR, (3rd not named) - 177.6 2. Bread, Lulla, Skullface - 176.15 That was until 3 separate viewers came forward with translations from Vision & Benno's stream (since been unpublished, however I have the clips), indicating they had purposefully miscalculated their score in order to beat us by a little over a point. Here's how the leaderboard looks without their false reporting 1. Bread, Lulla, Skullface - 176.15 2. BennoJr, iVisionSR, (3rd not named) - 175.4 Translated from their Vod (clip below) iVision: "Um Benno, You have to add an extra point to our score yes?" Benno: "Yes that's ok." iVision: "or just add 10 or something" Benno: "Yes I will" iVision: "Then you can say, the 0 was added by accident" Benno: "Or we should add a placement, I'm going to add extra placement" On top of purposefully reporting their scores incorrectly to take 1st over 2nd, they also attempted to have points taken away from us for an infraction that occurred in the first game (accidental portable Radar throw from Lulla). The Admin reviewed and decided that unless there was any kills or info taken from this, it was an accident and shouldn't be punished as all three of us died right after. I have absolutely no gripe with people trying to debate rules and the integrity of the tournament, that's completely fine. The Admin will always determine the outcome of those scenarios, that's what they exist for. What I have an issue with, and can't comprehend myself, is that not only would they attempt to take points away from us for an infraction that changed nothing (petty is what I would call it at the bare minimum) but go out of their way to lie about their scores in such a blatant way, thinking no one would fact check them when $2,000 is on the line. The balls it takes to be lying while attempting to "bring justice" is insane. Their incorrect score reports are shown here Game 2: Kills (11) Placement (7th - 1.3x) Actual Game 2: Kills (11) Placement (5th - 1.5x) Game 4: Kills (4) Placement (28th - 1.1x) Actual Game 4: Kills (4) Placement (25th - 1.2x) Game 6: Kills (12) Placement (15th - 1.2x) Actual Game 6: Kills (12) Placement (13th - 1.2x) Netting them an extra 2.2 points (just enough to beat us) These score miscalculations would regularly seem like such a minor difference, but when the leaderboard is so close like it was yesterday, it is clear they were trying to beat the system. People break rules in tournaments all the time, knowingly or unknowingly. I died to a Katt AMR yesterday when they were banned, die to portable radars all of the time while they're banned, and still do not lie about my scores with money involved. I look at this situation similar to cheating. Vision and Benno purposefully attempted to take 1st while rightfully in 2nd place, the difference of $1,262 for their team or $148.50. None of this ever would've been found if not for a couple different viewers taking the time to translate their conversations. Thank you Flexxal, Parteroni, SuperJoe, Johan, and Lulla for taking the time to go through their scores. Second clip translation Vision: "Benno, you can't deal with numbers. Actually, you shouldn't do those scores at all things are going completely wrong changing and stuff. If they ask why did you do it, just say I'm bad with numbers." Benno: "Yes, I have discalculate. That's when you see a 1 instead of a 4, I'm just going to say that my parents taught me to round up haha." I can't describe how unhappy this whole situation makes me. If they're willing to ruin the integrity of a Twitter tournament, imagine what lengths they'd go to when real money is involved. All other proof will be linked below if you're interested in viewing it, I cannot believe how grimy people can be over money. Lastly, they will clearly never be invited to another one of our tournaments again, and hopefully others catch on. This type of behavior cannot be ramified short-term, it is stealing.

bread

1,638,120 views • 2 years ago

why did “JING JING” appear on the screen during “L.O.V.E.”? (#JanJingjing) CONTEXT 🩷 (vid 2) - jan and singto sang “L.O.V.E.” by X3 Super Gang during the university star contest scene in SOTUS ep 5. the lyrics to “L.O.V.E.” are: “oh baby, L - i look over there, but it isn’t there O - i look over here, but i can’t find it V - which way should i look to find it? E - where is this thing called love? i really want to encounter it” - notably, if we directly translate the last lyric, “อยากจะพบเจอจริง ๆ (yak-ja-phob-je-jing-jing),” word by word, it’ll be “want to encounter really.” - in other words, the pronouns are dropped in this lyric, as thai is a pro-drop language, whereas “really (jing-jing)” appears at the end of the lyric as an adverb SOTUS 10TH YEAR CONCERT 🩷 (pic 1) - combined with the current context (i.e., janjingjing as a pair), this lyric can also sound like, “i want to encounter jingjing.” therefore, it was a super smart and fun touch to have “JING JING” appear on the screen whenever jan sang this lyric while re-enacting the scene during the concert (( to note, while “really (จริง ๆ)” and “jingjing (name; จิงจิง)” sound the same, their spellings are different, as you can see. the “ๆ” in “really” is a repetition marker in thai, so jingjing sometimes types her name as “จิงๆ,” as you will see below )) 🩷 (vid 3) - as a result, the watermark clip went viral, where jan got teased on day 2 [💬: suay-jing-jing (“you’re really pretty”), but i don’t want to say too much. jingjing’s watermark was all over the screen yesterday 🦊: oh… 💬: rak-jing-jing (“love jingjing”). hashtag janjingjing] 🩷 (pic 4) - when jingjing replied to jan’s post about SOTUS 10th year concert, she referred back to this lyric, “want to encounter really (yak-ja-PHOB-JE-JING-JING)”: [🐯: ได้พบเจอจิงๆแล้วนะ (dai-PHOB-JE-JING-JING-laew-na; “you’ve finally encountered jingjing”)] - as noted above, jingjing typed her name as “จิงๆ” here instead of “จิงจิง,” which further emphasizes the wordplay SO YEAH 🤟🏻💕 (more similar wordplay involving “really” VS “jingjing” is included in the mentions ;p)

²²

21,334 views • 1 month ago

I think this is a very interesting business case to discuss Because as a business owner he's in the right, and legally he's got himself covered, he does state it's a subscription multiple times: - "ships free monthly" (although literally TINY in font-size:10px) - in the cart it states "delivers every 1 month" (font-size:13px) - in checkout "1 month subscription with 20% discount" (font-size:12px) - in checkout "recurring subtotal $48.00 every month" (font-size:14px) - in checkout "by continuing with your payment, you agree to the future charges listed on this page and the cancellation policy." (font-size:12px) But as a customer I'd get angry here too, if I click through it fast while doing multiple things on a busy day (like most people), it's highly likely you miss it'a subscription because: - when you buy most things, they don't default to a subscription, you just buy a single thing, here it immediately defaults to a subscription - the single purchase option is shown below the CTA so it is possible: "One-Time Purchase - $180 $167 ($1.85 / Day)" but in TINY text again (font-size:14px) vs the subscription CTA that's in capitals "ADD TO CART" (font-size:16px) I don't blame the guy either, B2C supplements businesses like these are brutal, getting someone to get a subscription means you can sell the same thing probably at least 3 times But you're also counting on them to NOT see it's a subscription, and then secondly forgetting it's a subscription So I'd call this 100% asshole design, but ironically very legally sound, I try keep the asshole design to a minimum on my sites, for Photo AI, I do have a it a little bit, I show a $349/year annual plan as "$29/mo billed annually $349" but I also have a self-refund if you did that wrong after Anyway my point is it's not really black and white, competitors force you to do asshole design, or you make 3-4x less than them, meanwhile as a customer it feels you're being tricked I'd always go with whatever design makes sense if you'd sell to your mom and you wouldn't want her to be tricked! Actually with most things in a business always ask what your mom would think! Would she approve or disapprove? I call it "the mom test"

@levelsio

171,704 views • 4 months ago

The Los Angeles Lakers are about to undergo a massive transformation, but not in the way fans might think. When private equity head Josh Kushner and media mogul Bob Iger stepped in with a $12.5 billion purchase deal, most people assumed it was just another huge headline in sports business. However, an internal pitch deck given to prospective investors tells a completely different story, one that focuses far more on aggressive profit goals than winning basketball games. Here is what is currently happening behind closed doors: 1. The $30 Billion Target New ownership is aiming to nearly triple the franchise's valuation to $30 billion over the next decade. To hit that massive number, they need to generate hundreds of millions in fresh cash very quickly. 2. Squeezing Everyday Fans Their immediate financial plan targets ticket sales. The internal presentation reveals a strategy to reclaim thousands of season tickets currently held by brokers and convert them into high-priced single-game seats. The goal? Push average single-game ticket prices from $217 to well over $360. 3. Private Equity vs. Franchise Culture For decades, Dr. Jerry Buss ran the Lakers with a clear focus on star players and championship banners. Under this new financial blueprint, the focus shifts toward cutting millions in operating costs, filling the venue with corporate sponsors, and prioritizing profit margins. When a front office starts treating a sports team like a cash cow, spending heavily on roster construction under tight salary cap rules becomes much harder to justify. Will this aggressive strategy end up alienating the very fanbase that built the Lakers' brand? I broke down the numbers, the ticket changes, and what this financial shift means for the future of the franchise. Read the full breakdown in the replies👇🏿

Frederick Okocha

125,139 views • 11 days ago

This will be a long post, Special Megamix featuring all my best clips from 2022 to 2026 My journey began back in 2019 when I was 13. I moved from Fortnite to Apex when it launched. I actually disliked the game at first because it was the "Fortnite Killer," but my friends dragged me into it. I was instantly hooked, realized I had a gift for it, and started the grind. I peaked as Thailand #7 Bangalore in Season 1, Reached Predator for the first time in Season 2, Solo'd to Predator in Season 5 Split 1, First Predator in Thailand in Season 5 Split 2, and was Thailand's #1 for multiple consecutive seasons from 12 to 21, Peaked #9 PC in Season 16 Split 2, Became the first Thai to reach #1 PC and the only one to ever hold #3 both splits. I am the only one in Thailand to ever hold 1 digit more than once (3 times) My pro career started in ALGS 2022 Split 1. I had my best performance ever, pulling off a 1v18 win as a solo in Pro League with 13 kills and an insane end-game clutch (highest at the time for ALGS). But then in 2023 during Split 1 Pro League I was falsely suspended for 1 year for cheating without any explanation or support whatsoever from EA, then It’s repeated every year since. My latest ban is scheduled to be lifted on 1st August 2027, My biggest heartbreak was when I won EWC 2024 Qualifier with Lightning Unicorn, only to get disqualified a few weeks later, but since EA refused to communicate nor give any response to my appeals and ALGS Admins had no authority to help me and told that this is "between me and EA" I had to watch my team play EWC with a stand-in and with rushed schedule. My account started getting falsely banned in 2024 for cheating and denied every appeals but I didn't give up and continued playing as if nothing happens on other account and repeatedly got banned again in 2025 and recently few days ago. What truly baffles me is I played on 2 separate account (One Predator which I played on more) but only one that was banned is the Master account which was Gold 2 prior to me playing on it, I can only speculate about why it was flagged; one possibility is the unusually fast climb and mass reports. My plan now is to just secure Pred for this split, take a long hiatus, and come back next year to play in Pro League (IF EA doesn't randomly ban me again). Until then, enjoy the clips. Thanks to everyone who's been on this ride with me.

killmete.

28,659 views • 1 month ago

If you're a brand operator, this might be the most useful 4-minute video you watch all weekend. Cherene (Bobbi, ILIA Beauty: 100s of millions revenue) is the GOAT. If your playbook isn't working, you're stuck on discounts, or facing channel cannibalization, look no further than what she has to say. Spoiler alert: it's not about short-term ROAS. It's about Brand. She's in the trenches making it happen & articulates it brilliantly. If you listen to anyone, listen to her. My 3 key takeaways, quotes & actions you can consider: ***Takeaway 1: The old DTC playbook doesn't work anymore.*** "You can't just drive growth by doing running the same growth playbook." "And that works until it doesn't." "We have to, like, build equity into who we are as a brand... exploring, like, what happens if we move a little bit upper funnel?... not looking for, an immediate last click, direct response goal." "But like in order for me to drive the D2C business I'm going to need the total business to grow Like I can't that performance marketing is not enough to grow the business." "So we need to actually invest in brand marketing. We need like real top of funnel marketing dollars to put into the business." ***Takeaway 2: The reason why brands are struggling right now (because they rely on all of their traffic coming from Meta and Google Ads).*** "And I've talked to some of these brands too, like these smaller ones and they're just playing the like meta and Google game and it's really hard because they're not able to drive profitable acquisition because they're not getting traffic outside or acquisition outside of Google and Meta." "And so I think that's where it's like, okay, are you competing in the auction against other brands and how well are you competing?" ***Takeaway 3: The truth about retail expansion and 'cannibalization' (you must expand your brand faster than your distribution).*** "And if you expand your distribution faster than you're able to expand your brand, then you're just trading sales between channels and one channel is going to eat the other." "Well, it's like, no, actually, the brand's responsible for growing its awareness as fast as it's growing its distribution." "And if you think that you can just get sales by expanding distribution, you're gravely mistaken." "So now it's your job to, like, find more people. And that's the challenge, which is again, why that awareness type of marketing is so important as you grow and have distribution." Actions you can take: Ask yourself these Q's on your next vision quest 1. Is my rolling reach up? 2. Organic traffic growth vs. overall business: Is it keeping pace? If not, what are the risks (esp. with Meta CPMs up >25% YoY)? 3. Branded organic search: Are you gaining share vs. competitors? (Crucial to track this data beyond Google Trends). Hope this helps ✌️❤️🤘 Thank you to Andrew Faris for the awesome podcast. All eps are gold.

Preston Rutherford

17,112 views • 1 year ago

hey here is the final result of octopus invaders on nvidia's flagship at full precision. nemotron super 120B on 2x H200 NVL. BF16 unquantized. 287GB of VRAM. hermes agent as the harness. 60 tok/s. first try it autonomously coded for 6 minutes straight. created 11 files. correct project structure. correct load order. started the server. i opened the browser and the result was a blank screen. i did not give up. second try i gave it a precise list of bugs and things to fix. it went back in for another 3 minutes. patched the code. served it again. still blank. so i did what any sane person would do. third try i just said the screen is blank, test it and fix it yourself. and this is where nemotron showed what it actually is. it became a debugger. you can see it in the video. realtime CSS test squares, red screen flashes, hermes agent browser tools, inspecting its own output. it built the parallax background with planets and comets. it rendered a rocket ship that tracks your mouse with fire and bullet physics. the aesthetic is real. but no enemies spawn. no collision. not playable. what surprised me is qwen 27B one shotted this exact game on a single RTX 3090 at Q4 quant. and here is nvidia's flagship at full precision on enterprise hardware needing 3 tries and still not getting there. that makes my hope high for the undisputed qwen 122B which is about to face the same test next. same hardware. same prompt and same harness. lets see if it one shots or not. full session in the video. no cuts. 5x speed.

Sudo su

11,011 views • 6 months ago

meta muse spark 1.1 vs gpt 5.6 sol vs fable 5 vs grok 4.5 meta recently dropped muse spark 1.1 – a multimodal reasoning model from meta superintelligence labs built for agentic tasks. key facts: • 1m token context with active self-management – the model compacts its own history and keeps only the steps needed for later work • trained to orchestrate multi-agent systems: as main agent it plans and delegates to parallel subagents, as subagent it sticks to its job and knows when to escalate back • computer use trained to pick between scripting and clicking – writes automation when it's faster, clicks when it's simpler, batches actions per step • first public api from meta: the meta model api is now in preview • benchmarks: sweeps the agent column – mcp atlas 88.1 (opus 4.8: 82.2), jobbench 54.7 (opus: 48.4), humanity's last exam 62.1 (1st). loses coding – deepswe 1.1 53.3 vs gpt 5.5's 67.0, swe bench pro 61.5 vs opus's 69.2 our test – 3 prompts, single-file html, three.js, fully procedural, no assets: 1. norwegian house cantilevered over a fjord in a snowstorm – transmissive glass wall, fully modelled interior 2. beijing siheyuan courtyard house in dawn fog – instanced roof tiles, dougong brackets, glowing paper windows 3. new mexico adobe pueblo in an approaching dust storm – deep window reveals, windward grit accumulation we ran the test on AI/ML API platform results: - cost #1 muse spark 1.1 – $0.20 #2 grok 4.5 – $0.51 #3 gpt 5.6 sol – $1.93 #4 fable 5 – ~$5.20 - output tokens #1 muse spark 1.1 – 41,868 #2 gpt 5.6 sol – 49,139 #3 grok 4.5 – 64,954 #4 fable 5 – 81,849 - lines of code #1 muse spark 1.1 – 1,799 #2 gpt 5.6 sol – 2,377 #3 fable 5 – 3,088 #4 grok 4.5 – 4,216 observations: • muse spark is the cheapest of the four by a wide margin – 2.5x under grok, ~26x under fable per run. output quality tracks the price • only 7.4% of its output tokens are reasoning (3,104 of 41,868) – the model barely thinks before writing. economic, not pedantic: it commits to the first plan and ships it • the low loc is not compression, it's omission – all three prompts demanded instancing, muse spark delivered it in one muse spark's code quality – reviewed by fable 5: upsides: 1. all three files run 2. the adobe grit effect is legit – shader injection via onbeforecompile, windward faces detect storm direction through a normal-dot-wind term and darken procedurally 3. the fjord glass is real meshphysicalmaterial with transmission and ior, not a transparent quad 4. the siheyuan properly instances barrel tiles, dougong blocks and courtyard pavers downsides: 1. in the fjord file the strafe vector is negated – press a, you move right; press d, you move left. exactly the key mix-up we kept hitting with this model 2. all three files ship the model's self-doubt as comments: "// actually yaw orientation: need correct" sits above a direction vector that gets computed, abandoned and recomputed – dead vectors allocated every frame, 60 times a second 3. the siheyuan registers two separate keydown listeners, one containing an empty if-block 4. snow "accumulation" on the norway roof is a sine wobble on a scale value, not accumulation 5. "instanced snow" became 3,500 plain points. zero dispose calls anywhere pattern: minimal reasoning, minimal code, minimal price. it nails the flashy requirements – shaders, transmissive glass – and quietly drops the boring ones: instancing, controls, cleanup. you get a demo that mostly runs and a control scheme you can't trust follow thehype. for 24/7 ai news, analysis and breakdowns

thehype.

135,556 views • 2 months ago

Punjab Journalist Ritesh LAKHI IND invited one journalist Rajinder Taggar to support anti-AAP propagandist Rattandeep Singh Dhaliwal !! Same Taggar, who himself, went in jail for 6+ months in a case of rape & extortion filled by SAD NK Sharma only during SAD-BJP 2007-2017 gov, anyways. But Taggar actually end up exposing biased journalism of Rattan here & in a response look how RD just did abba-jabba-dabba, as even RD knows he works on single point anti-AAP nagative, hate & agenda !! Example : In a same interview, Just to counter good work of Bhagwant Mann of providing Nehri Pani utilization from 26% to 78% in just 4 years, he mentions its AAP & BM gov who 'gave' BBMP rights to centre gov. Whereas if he was not anti-AAP hateful propagandist only, he would have mentioned, its Modi centre gov who 'took' away BBMP rights & BM actually opposed it everywhere he could & even went to BBMP dam when BBMP officers tried to release Punjab water to Haryana. Yes, you can say he could have done more, but putting solely on BM, thats not what a true journalist does. As they say, proof lies in the pudding & it does not take even 2 minutes for Rattan to expose his clear anti-AAP agenda. We as AAP supporters, support good journalism, nobody asking you to say everything is going great in Punjab, but atleast tell people that not everything is bad in Punjab under AAP, but this is what is good being done & point out what is going wrong by them, so that they can correct the shortcomings & if they dont you can keep criticizing them for that, fair. In this case also, RD is reporting since 2-3 years that so many MLAs tickets will be cut which is ok, no one had objection or filled the case, but what he did this time without verifying from AAP is putting specific names of not one, two but 40 MLAs 2-3 days right before MC elections on 26th May, which made party in power completely vulnerable, MLAs stopped doing campaign for MC elections, before getting clarity on the MLA ticket. Hence they had to act to stop this nonsense and panic & they acted, otherwise he would have been motivated to keep doing this agenda reporting damaging AAP & its government. If you expect sanity from others, then 1st show sanity yourself also as its very easy to blame everything on gov for even your clear biased hateful propaganda reporting & say no one should take any action against you no matter what you do, just because you have tagged yourself as 'journalist' !!

Gss🇮🇳

11,447 views • 4 months ago

Honkai Star Rail issue TLDR; no real improvements towards the gameplay/TRPG depth itself while continuing to make changes that don't matter 'in the now'. More context; As of the last few patches it's felt like HSR has made 1 step forward & 3 back (Ex. Wishful Resin availability vs impact of the item). With a turn based RPG, I expect more actions to be taken that encourage strategic gameplay, combat/gear choices, or otherwise game defining matters that give the player more satisfaction (of their wins, accomplishments, goal challenges, etc.) in the game. Great examples of this are FF Tactics, Valkyria Chronicles, Octopath Traveler, & any Shin Megami Tensei or Fire Emblem game. I don't have any definite backing behind this, just my own assumptions & experiences, but it feels like HSR has become more greedy than their usual gacha self. A game (that presents itself) based around team structure, archetypes, & decision making has shown a severe lack of these since shortly after Superbreak's introduction. The lack of STRONG 4-stars has left many of our viable "teams" lingering on a "play this or bust" situation. Of course, having at least 80% of the limited 5-stars removes this entirely, but that introduces an entirely different subject that still favors my argument in the lack of team variety we have. Ex. The counter-archetype team. There's little to no difference between THE optimal team if you use Yunli or Clara, despite the two of them playing differently w/ different build opportunities. You won't swap support units because they offer a new 'thing' to benefit Yunli/Clara. You will swap units because you don't have the premier one or you don't have the other premier one (i.e Sunday vs Sparkle selection). The enemy design has been decent, with some bosses having amazing potential, but that effort is quickly made irrelevant due to the HP inflation or lack of preventative measures the avg player can take against them (i.e not having shields, cleanse, enhanced breaking, AV control, etc.) By no means is that me alluding to every player deserves every limited thing, but it is me saying there's 0 reason the last 4-star we got was on Sept 9th, and per the drip marketing received, we aren't getting a new one any time soon. On stream, I spoke about how impactful a row system (Persona 1, Unicorn Overlord, Torna DLC for Xenoblade 2, etc.) would be to the strategy behind the game IF they prioritized combat depth instead of selling only selling limited characters. HSR has the potential to really put their foot in the combat strategy and team building of the game, but I don't understand the reason they refuse to do it when they have the means to. This brings me to the greed I believe HSR has displayed lately. There are multiple pts I want to address on this matter, but this tweet is too long & I wanna go play Metaphor so I'll try to emphasize this point a lot stronger. Keep in mind, these items are conceptually of top 3 importance in the game (value wise). * There is 0 reason the bundle of Wishful Resin should cost $35-50 worth of stellar jade bundles instead of a flat price. They are purposely inflating your purchase on an item that, in my opinion, is insanely valuable for every player. * Trading 800 relic remains or Self Modeling Resin for 1 Wishful Resin is a scam. 800 RR = 80 trash relics or 2 +15 relics. Both of which, require you to invest a LOT of resources into in order to obtain them in the first place. * 2 sub-stats should not cost 4 Wishful Resin if 1 sub-stat only cost 1 Wishful Resin. * Receiving ONE WISHFUL RESIN FOR FREE per 40ish days, is INSANE. lol Receiving TWO IF YOU PAY per 40ish days is even more ludicrous. In the event you decided to buy all the Wishful bundles per 40 days & only choose the WR as your option, that's $120 (70 + 50) for 22 WR. Adding the BP into that is now just shy of paying for a limited character. Don't even get me started on how the only available dice in the game is paid for while still having a 75% chance to screw you over in RNG, either. I understand this looks like a giga rant, & it is. It pisses me off watching a game you avidly enjoy make decisions that, I can only assume, are out of pure greed. They could do so much to spin this game into an easy top 5 position with little to similar effort in pushing out stronger characters per $300. Hence, my feeling of being burnt out & even that took me months to understand/realize.

Iyo

135,611 views • 1 year ago

I’m on a mission to stop men from black-pilling on the idea that marriage, kids, grandkids, and a wife over 40 or 50 means a low-sex or sexless life with a wife they no longer find attractive. That’s becoming the norm in far too many marriages that last long enough to reach their 40s and beyond. It’s driving men away from marriage while lulling women into thinking the norm is acceptable - even as it harms marriage as a whole. I’m not dumping the whole job of keeping a 40+ marriage sexy on wives. Husbands have a responsibility too which includes expecting, investing, and enabling their wives to successfully respond to those expectations. Toward that end, last year I set an ambitious goal for my 52-year-old wife - mother of our three kids and grandmother to our one grandchild so far - to get back on the NPC stage after more than a decade away from it and win her IFBB pro card in Fit Model. I invested heavily in that goal and with the coach we hired, we built a 3-show plan for this summer. The first two shows were to qualify for nationals (where pro cards are won) and get her comfortable on stage again. After a year-plus of work getting herself stage ready she won 1st in her 50+ class in Vegas in July, 1st again in Nashville in August, then competed in Pittsburgh about a week ago - the show where winning the class could earn the pro card. We left home a week before Nashville and stayed on the road through Pittsburgh - 5 weeks of strange hotel and Airbnb beds, strange gyms, and strange kitchens to cook in to stay on plan. It took a bit of a toll. Avis’s back started acting up after Nashville. She’s had “tweaky” back issues on and off for decades, so it wasn’t a total surprise. In Pittsburgh we got her massages and she used the foam roller with some success. But show morning it flared up again. She was dealing with some pain and struggled some in her posing - hitting poses cleanly and holding a smile is part of the judging, not just the physique alone. If you watch the video of her routine that morning you can see it in compared to previous shows. That’s not an excuse - just a reality and every woman who walked out there was fighting something. After the 50+ A Fit Model routines, the women line up on either side of the stage while judges pick the top 6 for first callouts. If you miss first callouts your shot at the win is over. Judges then move them around - front, rear, side by side - usually ending with 1st in the center. That is the comparison video I shared. At the end of first callouts I couldn’t tell if they had Avis 2nd, 3rd, or 4th because of the even number of girls in the callout. At finals we learned it was 3rd. 3rd is nothing to be ashamed of at a national show against what is supposed to be the best of the best - but the reality was not placing 1st meant missing the pro card. We have a new plan and a couple of new targets - later this year or next year, depending on how it plays out. Looping back to my main point - every woman on stage in the videos I shared is over 50. How far over I don’t know. The one I’m married to is 52. I’m not saying every husband has to go this far in expectation or investment to have a marriage they enjoy. I am saying it is possible to have a decades-long marriage that does not become a dead bedroom with a wife who stopped prioritizing fitness. Don’t black-pill. Set the expectations that would actually be good for your marriage and invest enough to see them through. Wives - respond in good faith with the resources your husband is giving you. He has expectations because he wants a marriage both of you enjoy. -R

Rob and Avis Ramble

87,358 views • 21 days ago

🎬Whimsical Reverie | Furniture Preview 🛋️Home Sentiments In celebration of the Home system's launch, stylists can obtain free furniture items via the [Home Sentiments] event after the Version 1.9 update on September 1, 2025 (UTC-7). When the event starts, unlock 1 free furniture piece each day. The event lasts 3 days—claim up to 3 free items in total! The event has 3 rounds, giving you plenty of chances to decorate your home! 🛋️Dreamland Showcase Stylists can earn Dreamland Stones by completing weekly Chronicle Tasks. Dreamland Stones can be used to exchange for items in the Dreamland Shop, including the [Detective's Study] series of furniture and Diamonds. Spend 680 Stellarites to sign the [Dreamland Pact]. Once signed, you can instantly claim the new furniture [Loving Fufu & Flowers] and its Furniture Sketch. Complete the current Chronicle Tasks to earn bonus Dreamland Stones. After signing the [Dreamland Pact] and accumulating a certain number of Dreamland Stones in this phase of Dreamland Showcase, 680 Stellarites will be refunded. You can claim the Stellarites in Dreamland Pact interface. 🛋️Chorus of Stars Purchase the "Stellar Poems Pack" for 1,480 Diamonds to receive 12 types of Diamond-purchased furniture and 8 types of Astralite exchangeable furniture, totaling 20 types and 38 pieces. This pack can only be purchased once. Each type of furniture can be purchased separately with no purchase limit, but it will not be available at the discounted set price. 🛋️Furniture Set Series Purchase the "Leisure Tea Brewing Set I" for 680 Stellarites to receive 6 types of furniture, totaling 14 pieces, including the [Eternal Years Screen]. This set can only be purchased once. Each type of furniture can be purchased separately with no purchase limit, but it will not be available at the discounted set price. Purchase the "Leisure Tea Brewing Set II" for 420 Stellarites to receive 6 types of furniture, totaling 11 pieces, including the [Twilight Incense Burner]. This set can only be purchased once. Each type of furniture can be purchased separately with no purchase limit, but it will not be available at the discounted set price. Purchase the "Leisure Tea Brewing Set III" for 180 Stellarites to receive 3 types of furniture, totaling 8 pieces, including the [Rolling Screen]. This set can only be purchased once. Each type of furniture can be purchased separately with no purchase limit, but it will not be available at the discounted set price. 🛋️Stargazing Reveries Purchase the [Astral Radiance Pack] to receive selected furniture pieces such as [Stellar Cascade], [Echo Waterwheel], and [Seasons Couch]. These selected items are tagged as both "Home Furniture" and "Decoration," and may be placed in your Home or in Miraland. The set is limited to one purchase. If you prefer to buy items individually: [Stellar Cascade] is available for purchase, [Seasons Couch] for 680 Stellarites, and [Echo Waterwheel] for 450 Stellarites. Individual pieces of furniture can be purchased with no purchase limit. —— The Coziest Open-World Game! Infinity Nikki Version 1.9 "Music Season" launches globally on September 1st (UTC-7)! ➤ Download Now: ➤ Join us on Facebook Group: #InfinityNikki

Infinity Nikki

43,003 views • 1 year ago

My take on the Witchcrafts Velja/Crownie (and bwipo nemesis tbh) drama Full video explanation below TLDR: Velja was the only one being reasonable and actually trying to understand what happened and to learn. He was also correct in the sense bot lane should have prio at any point if they choose to but the problem was their bot lane didnt communicate that they didnt want to have prio for scuttle. Crownie was correct in the way he played lane but was misunderstanding the difference between having no prio and losing lane. Kept getting ego hurt by being told he had no prio which was true. Bwipo and Nemesis were being completely insufferable name calling and making situation worse for 0 reason and were just completely wrong. Rekkles did the right thing by leaving the drama NON TLDR: Actually insane that nemesis spouted that Velja knows nothing about the game when he is very clearly a good player and has been their MVP for probably 3/4 of LR existence. They are also teammates and you should never treat your teammate like that. Velja was also correct in the sense that bot lane SHOULD have prio, even after Ezreal TPs cait/bard can get prio but they chose not to (Which is completely ok and correct) but they did not communicate what they wanted to do at all in game, nor during the review Bwipo saying crownie lost lane because ezreal TPs back with 20% more hp and a fucking tear which is completely incorrect. Caitlyn has great conditions here, enemy is suffering down summoners and caitlyn is never in kill threat, Caitlyn/bard still completely dictate this lane and can outsustain and slow push crash the wave whenever they get a good enough back to do so. forcing ezreal to take a bad recall later while also being down TP and flash, then when caitlyn comes back with item/level advantage and summ advantage can kill later Velja completely griefed in fighting the scuttle crab given the conditions. Again they COULD fight for scuttle crab if they wanted however they would have needed to communicate this beforehand and make sure they had prio for the scuttle crab which they 100% could have at any point. by either not trading entire hp bar when ezreal has tp, or after ezreal tps forcing prio back with stronger champs. Velja was the only one (aside from Rekkles who didnt partake in the review) being reasonable in the review as he was actually trying to understand why his bot lane didnt have prio which is completely fair given caitlyn/bard should always have prio in this lane (if they want to). However, it was a decision and a good one at that to not have prio so caitlyn can play for a better condition on the next play. Which needed to be communicated to Velja during the review and this entire situation would have been avoided and a learning session instead of just telling each other they are shit.

Griffin

149,155 views • 6 months ago