Loading video...
Video Failed to Load
No one is talking about this
30,258 views • 8 days ago •via X (Twitter)
14 Comments

Joe Kent reached out to me about it, when he was Chief of Staff for DNI Tulsi Gabbard. Congressman Eli Crane testified to the Committee on the Assassination about ballistic evidence of a 2nd shooter. Then, POTUS shut it down. Why? Leverage?

But the FBI is right about Tyler Robinson this time, correct?

Didn't Tucker talk about this already?

We are not going to lose congress unless they cheat in real time. Too many people are awake, but we have a bunch of looney tunes, so it’s ALL in GODS hands.

According to @dbongino in a fit of rage who dare question this, inadvertently ADMITTED that it was TRUMP who called off this investigation, You would think a president would want to know more about his assasination attempt, instead he makes accusations with no true investigation.

@MattWalshShow MK-ULTRA is running rampant through our society!

You can clearly see who’s being paid to push this narrative.

There was no follow up b/c it was our greatest ally.

Why haven't Republicans turned loose special prosecutors to investigate all these huge issues to prevent democrats from stopping anything

Hey Matt are you still on Putin’s payroll? You’re such a pathetic fraud

This is the most insane and corrupt era in American history by light years

if you didn’t know that already you shouldn’t be doing a podcast.

he way the Butler case unfolded—early statements that later proved incomplete, a crime scene cleaned and a body cremated quickly, and records that kept appearing years afterward—fits the “civil war” framing because it looks to many people like one side of the institutional split managing information and evidence while the other side treats those same actions as proof of hostility. In that model the shooting is not just a lone-actor crime; it becomes another node in the hybrid fight over who controls the narrative, the records, and the legitimacy of the system itself. The official conclusion that Crooks acted alone does not resolve that interpretive split; it is part of what keeps the two camps talking past each other.

If it true, why cremate the body?
