Video yükleniyor...

Video Yüklenemedi

Bu video yüklenirken bir sorun oluştu. Bu geçici bir ağ sorunundan kaynaklanıyor olabilir veya video kullanılamıyor olabilir.

Ana Sayfaya Dön

No one should be surprised that the average CNN viewer doesn't understand the difference between Capitalism and Socialism. We have failed the next generation when they're unable define the basics of what it means to live in a socialist or capitalist society. Embarrassing.

Thomas Hern

108,199 subscribers

33,926 görüntüleme • 1 ay önce •via X (Twitter)

Komedi Haberler & Politika Eğitim

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Yorum

Yorum bulunmuyor

Orijinal gönderinin yorumları burada görünecek

Benzer Videolar

Socialism Vs Capitalism. This is why anybody who suggests that pre-colonial Africa was a capitalist society should be put in jail. Watch till the end.

Socialism Vs Capitalism. This is why anybody who suggests that pre-colonial Africa was a capitalist society should be put in jail. Watch till the end.

Biggest Mack

28,497 görüntüleme • 1 ay önce

Francesca Hong when asked if voters should fear socialism and communism: “No. This is a state where we will still have a $2.33 tipped minimum wage and $7.25 minimum wage. It's gonna be hard to turn that into socialism soon, but what we can do is fight for policies that put working-class people first.” This is a better answer than what we normally get from democratic socialists running for office. We live under a dystopian capitalist system where 70% of Americans struggle to afford housing, healthcare, and groceries, yet the media and both parties constantly fearmonger about socialism. It’s insanity! Socialists need to stop backing down when asked about socialism and communism. It’s not only weak but also concedes power to the capitalist system people are struggling under and fighting against. Socialists should pivot to policies that improve the material conditions of the working class and call out the absurd notion that we should “fear socialism” when we live under a capitalist system that’s failing the majority as it consolidates wealth into fewer and fewer hands. What people should fear is capitalism because it’s the reason our country is in decay.

Francesca Hong when asked if voters should fear socialism and communism: “No. This is a state where we will still have a $2.33 tipped minimum wage and $7.25 minimum wage. It's gonna be hard to turn that into socialism soon, but what we can do is fight for policies that put working-class people first.” This is a better answer than what we normally get from democratic socialists running for office. We live under a dystopian capitalist system where 70% of Americans struggle to afford housing, healthcare, and groceries, yet the media and both parties constantly fearmonger about socialism. It’s insanity! Socialists need to stop backing down when asked about socialism and communism. It’s not only weak but also concedes power to the capitalist system people are struggling under and fighting against. Socialists should pivot to policies that improve the material conditions of the working class and call out the absurd notion that we should “fear socialism” when we live under a capitalist system that’s failing the majority as it consolidates wealth into fewer and fewer hands. What people should fear is capitalism because it’s the reason our country is in decay.

Power to the People ☭🕊

33,432 görüntüleme • 18 gün önce

Capitalism has a moral basis. The reason being, unless you have economic freedom, you will have no other freedom at all. [...] To be free, you have to be capitalist. Every free society in the world is a capitalist society. Not every capitalist society is free, but a pre-condition for freedom is capitalism.

Capitalism has a moral basis. The reason being, unless you have economic freedom, you will have no other freedom at all. [...] To be free, you have to be capitalist. Every free society in the world is a capitalist society. Not every capitalist society is free, but a pre-condition for freedom is capitalism.

Margaret Thatcher

55,634 görüntüleme • 4 ay önce

Caleb Hammer debates a self-described socialist. Caleb Hammer: “You’re a socialist?” Guest: “Yes.” Caleb Hammer: “You know socialism has never worked. What socialism are you in favor of? Take a system that you’re in favor of.” Guest: “I just don’t want it to be capitalism.” Caleb Hammer: “Take a system that has been proven to work anywhere.” Guest: “I’m choosing socialism.” Caleb Hammer: “No… pick another country where it’s worked.” Guest: “New York.” Caleb Hammer: “That’s not socialist. That’s the most capitalist place in the world.” Guest: “They have more social programs.” Caleb Hammer: “All funded by the success of capitalism.”

Caleb Hammer debates a self-described socialist. Caleb Hammer: “You’re a socialist?” Guest: “Yes.” Caleb Hammer: “You know socialism has never worked. What socialism are you in favor of? Take a system that you’re in favor of.” Guest: “I just don’t want it to be capitalism.” Caleb Hammer: “Take a system that has been proven to work anywhere.” Guest: “I’m choosing socialism.” Caleb Hammer: “No… pick another country where it’s worked.” Guest: “New York.” Caleb Hammer: “That’s not socialist. That’s the most capitalist place in the world.” Guest: “They have more social programs.” Caleb Hammer: “All funded by the success of capitalism.”

Denji

11,908 görüntüleme • 1 ay önce

This PERFECTLY explains the Capitalism vs Socialism argument for America “So now, Colombia rejected a socialist. Peru rejected a socialist. El Salvador, Chile, Honduras, Ecuador, Bolivia, Argentina all rejected Marxist or socialist leadership. And Venezuela was destroyed by socialism. Latin Americans are rejecting socialism after having tried it. So why are Americans accepting socialism, having never tried it? Well, partially because most Americans don't know what socialism is It's not healthcare for all or affordable housing. Socialism isn't a synonym for all the things I want, but I'm not getting in my capitalist country. It's not a vibe. It's an economic system characterized by collective or governmental ownership of the means of production. Means of production meaning infrastructure used to produce goods and services like factories, farms, and companies. Capitalism also isn't a vibe. It's not billionaires and corporations controlling politics. It's not a synonym for all the things I hate about my country. It's an economic system characterized by private or corporate ownership of capital goods, AKA the means of production. Now, just like Mac versus Windows, there are different versions of capitalism and socialism. Finland, Norway, Denmark, and Sweden are less capitalistic than America, but they are still capitalist. Although they have a few exceptions to the rule, private companies own the means of production, not the government in those countries. Now, you might like certain programs that socialism promises, like universal healthcare, but those programs aren't tied to a specific operating system. You can run Photoshop on Mac or Windows, just like you can have universal healthcare in socialism or capitalism. But it seems we as a people keep getting more confused about what socialism is. In 1949, 34% of Americans correctly identified socialism as government ownership of the economy. By 2018, only 17% did, and I suspect it's even worse now. American politicians are confused, too. In 2015, Denmark's prime minister had to correct Bernie Sanders and say, "Denmark is far from a socialist planned economy. Denmark is a market economy." Zoran Mamdani is a democratic socialist. Democratic socialism is a version of socialism. Now, you could argue that socialism just hasn't been done right yet. And when every socialist experiment at the national level in the 20th century failed, and every experiment in the 21st century is failing, maybe the problem isn't that socialism hasn't worked in practice, it, that it almost certainly can't work in principle. And maybe the assertion that this time will be different isn't optimism, it's actually just unfalsifiability, where a theory cannot ever be contradicted by actual evidence. We have bugs in this version of capitalism that need to be fixed, principally that there is too much money in politics, that billions of dollars speak louder than millions of voices. And you know what? The socialists might create healthy pressure to fix those bugs. That's good, but that's different than changing the whole operating system. Sometimes the cure is worse than the disease. Because when there's never been a successful socialist country in history, and the countries who have actually experimented with it are abandoning it, the results start to speak for themselves. And lately, they're speaking Spanish.” And just so we’re crystal clear, here are the stated goals of the Democratic Socialists of America in America - Abolish the US Senate - Replace the Presidency and Supreme Court - Abolish the Electoral College • Abolish police and the prison system • Abolish ICE, grant amnesty to all immigrants and end visa restrictions • Public ownership of the largest corporations - Defund the US military - End economic sanctions on Iran - Government owned social housing

This PERFECTLY explains the Capitalism vs Socialism argument for America “So now, Colombia rejected a socialist. Peru rejected a socialist. El Salvador, Chile, Honduras, Ecuador, Bolivia, Argentina all rejected Marxist or socialist leadership. And Venezuela was destroyed by socialism. Latin Americans are rejecting socialism after having tried it. So why are Americans accepting socialism, having never tried it? Well, partially because most Americans don't know what socialism is It's not healthcare for all or affordable housing. Socialism isn't a synonym for all the things I want, but I'm not getting in my capitalist country. It's not a vibe. It's an economic system characterized by collective or governmental ownership of the means of production. Means of production meaning infrastructure used to produce goods and services like factories, farms, and companies. Capitalism also isn't a vibe. It's not billionaires and corporations controlling politics. It's not a synonym for all the things I hate about my country. It's an economic system characterized by private or corporate ownership of capital goods, AKA the means of production. Now, just like Mac versus Windows, there are different versions of capitalism and socialism. Finland, Norway, Denmark, and Sweden are less capitalistic than America, but they are still capitalist. Although they have a few exceptions to the rule, private companies own the means of production, not the government in those countries. Now, you might like certain programs that socialism promises, like universal healthcare, but those programs aren't tied to a specific operating system. You can run Photoshop on Mac or Windows, just like you can have universal healthcare in socialism or capitalism. But it seems we as a people keep getting more confused about what socialism is. In 1949, 34% of Americans correctly identified socialism as government ownership of the economy. By 2018, only 17% did, and I suspect it's even worse now. American politicians are confused, too. In 2015, Denmark's prime minister had to correct Bernie Sanders and say, "Denmark is far from a socialist planned economy. Denmark is a market economy." Zoran Mamdani is a democratic socialist. Democratic socialism is a version of socialism. Now, you could argue that socialism just hasn't been done right yet. And when every socialist experiment at the national level in the 20th century failed, and every experiment in the 21st century is failing, maybe the problem isn't that socialism hasn't worked in practice, it, that it almost certainly can't work in principle. And maybe the assertion that this time will be different isn't optimism, it's actually just unfalsifiability, where a theory cannot ever be contradicted by actual evidence. We have bugs in this version of capitalism that need to be fixed, principally that there is too much money in politics, that billions of dollars speak louder than millions of voices. And you know what? The socialists might create healthy pressure to fix those bugs. That's good, but that's different than changing the whole operating system. Sometimes the cure is worse than the disease. Because when there's never been a successful socialist country in history, and the countries who have actually experimented with it are abandoning it, the results start to speak for themselves. And lately, they're speaking Spanish.” And just so we’re crystal clear, here are the stated goals of the Democratic Socialists of America in America - Abolish the US Senate - Replace the Presidency and Supreme Court - Abolish the Electoral College • Abolish police and the prison system • Abolish ICE, grant amnesty to all immigrants and end visa restrictions • Public ownership of the largest corporations - Defund the US military - End economic sanctions on Iran - Government owned social housing

Wall Street Apes

129,949 görüntüleme • 15 gün önce

"Trump… doesn't understand what socialism is," says economist Dan Mitchell. Since socialism is government ownership of the means of production, the U.S. taking stakes in Intel, MP Materials, Nippon, and more IS socialist! Here's the BIG problem with that:

"Trump… doesn't understand what socialism is," says economist Dan Mitchell. Since socialism is government ownership of the means of production, the U.S. taking stakes in Intel, MP Materials, Nippon, and more IS socialist! Here's the BIG problem with that:

John Stossel

275,620 görüntüleme • 9 ay önce

Sanders on Socialism/Capitalism: I plan to spend the next several months making sure people understand the difference and it'll be what pushes us over the edge in November and helps catapult Republicans to win in the midterms.

Sanders on Socialism/Capitalism: I plan to spend the next several months making sure people understand the difference and it'll be what pushes us over the edge in November and helps catapult Republicans to win in the midterms.

Acyn

37,936 görüntüleme • 23 gün önce

Socialism. Do you know what socialism REALLY is? It is the mechanism to bring about a despotic nation. It has two ranks. The socialist major, which consists of the controllers, and the socialist minor, which consists of the plebeians who are under the control of the socialist major. What the minor does not understand is that power aggregates at the top. The decision makers inside of the socialist major cabal will always enjoy a luxury that the minor will not, which means that inequality WILL persist, at extreme levels, in a socialist system. Maybe more than in a capitalist one. Another thing that the minor does not understand is that socialism is dependent on capitalism and socialists work for the capitalist major cabal. That's right. The socialist minor works for the benefit of the capitalist major. Because the capitalist major will always be impervious to socialist policies while those same policies crush their competition in the lower and middle class. To reiterate, the socialist minor is a tool to crush the downtrodden; they were supposed to assist. But what's worse than the socialist-minor? The BLACK socialist-minor. Physical slavery became antiquated so the cabal upgraded to a new form of slavery...Socialism. So, the black socialist minor is a tool to support the latest version of slavery. If socialism aggregates power at the top, and the government is mostly white, you cannot support socialism and fight white supremacy simultaneously. Socialist programs turn poor black populations into wards of the state. They become dependent on the milk from Lady Liberty's breast. Their ambition is stripped from them. But more devastating, their coalition is stripped from them. With government assistance taking care of the poor black population, there is less reason for the black population to organize for their benefit since the government feeds their poor. But if the black population fed themselves, they would be a unified unit. This is exactly what the socialist major does NOT want. Socialism is a parasite with two hosts. One is capitalism, and the other is the socialist minor. Without an oppressed class, there would be no argument for socialism, so in order for socialism to survive, there needs to be oppression. Now, ask yourself, "Who is incentivized to sustain oppression?" The socialist major is really a capitalist in sheep's clothing. They understand how socialism knocks over the ladder while people are trying to climb up. The socialist minor is kept ignorant, given just enough information to get the job done, but not enough to see how harmful their work is. All while the socialist major and capitalist major share the same penthouse suites. Now, I must commend the socialist minor for their intentions. Many of them mean well. They are simply misguided by their emotions and not rational. They are big in heart but small in mind.

Socialism. Do you know what socialism REALLY is? It is the mechanism to bring about a despotic nation. It has two ranks. The socialist major, which consists of the controllers, and the socialist minor, which consists of the plebeians who are under the control of the socialist major. What the minor does not understand is that power aggregates at the top. The decision makers inside of the socialist major cabal will always enjoy a luxury that the minor will not, which means that inequality WILL persist, at extreme levels, in a socialist system. Maybe more than in a capitalist one. Another thing that the minor does not understand is that socialism is dependent on capitalism and socialists work for the capitalist major cabal. That's right. The socialist minor works for the benefit of the capitalist major. Because the capitalist major will always be impervious to socialist policies while those same policies crush their competition in the lower and middle class. To reiterate, the socialist minor is a tool to crush the downtrodden; they were supposed to assist. But what's worse than the socialist-minor? The BLACK socialist-minor. Physical slavery became antiquated so the cabal upgraded to a new form of slavery...Socialism. So, the black socialist minor is a tool to support the latest version of slavery. If socialism aggregates power at the top, and the government is mostly white, you cannot support socialism and fight white supremacy simultaneously. Socialist programs turn poor black populations into wards of the state. They become dependent on the milk from Lady Liberty's breast. Their ambition is stripped from them. But more devastating, their coalition is stripped from them. With government assistance taking care of the poor black population, there is less reason for the black population to organize for their benefit since the government feeds their poor. But if the black population fed themselves, they would be a unified unit. This is exactly what the socialist major does NOT want. Socialism is a parasite with two hosts. One is capitalism, and the other is the socialist minor. Without an oppressed class, there would be no argument for socialism, so in order for socialism to survive, there needs to be oppression. Now, ask yourself, "Who is incentivized to sustain oppression?" The socialist major is really a capitalist in sheep's clothing. They understand how socialism knocks over the ladder while people are trying to climb up. The socialist minor is kept ignorant, given just enough information to get the job done, but not enough to see how harmful their work is. All while the socialist major and capitalist major share the same penthouse suites. Now, I must commend the socialist minor for their intentions. Many of them mean well. They are simply misguided by their emotions and not rational. They are big in heart but small in mind.

Hotep Jesus

484,849 görüntüleme • 4 ay önce

AOC trying to explain the difference between socialism and communism: “I think to me the fundamental differences… I mean, there is many. One prevailing one is democracy. Democratic socialists are fundamentally pro-democracy and we believe in the ballot box.” Translation: “I have no idea, but please don’t notice.” She just defined the difference as “we vote for it.” That’s not a difference. That’s a marketing slogan. Every failed socialist/communist regime in history also claimed to be “for the people” and held elections. The ballot box doesn’t magically stop the part where they seize the means of production, bankrupt the country, and call dissent “counter-revolutionary.” If your entire distinction between socialism and communism is “we pinky promise to be nicer about it,” you’re not serious. You’re just rebranding. AOC is in fact, the dumbest member of Congress.

AOC trying to explain the difference between socialism and communism: “I think to me the fundamental differences… I mean, there is many. One prevailing one is democracy. Democratic socialists are fundamentally pro-democracy and we believe in the ballot box.” Translation: “I have no idea, but please don’t notice.” She just defined the difference as “we vote for it.” That’s not a difference. That’s a marketing slogan. Every failed socialist/communist regime in history also claimed to be “for the people” and held elections. The ballot box doesn’t magically stop the part where they seize the means of production, bankrupt the country, and call dissent “counter-revolutionary.” If your entire distinction between socialism and communism is “we pinky promise to be nicer about it,” you’re not serious. You’re just rebranding. AOC is in fact, the dumbest member of Congress.

Gunther Eagleman™

212,013 görüntüleme • 19 gün önce

🚨 BREAKING: Communist Zohran Mamdani is asked to EXPLAIN what a "Democrat Socialist" is.. Q: "Explain the difference. What is the difference between a Democrat, a democratic socialist and a communist?" ZOHRAN: "I'm a democratic socialist who's also a Democrat. I explain it in the words of Dr. King from decades ago, who said Call it democracy or call it democratic socialism. There must be a better distribution of wealth for all of god's children in this country."

🚨 BREAKING: Communist Zohran Mamdani is asked to EXPLAIN what a "Democrat Socialist" is.. Q: "Explain the difference. What is the difference between a Democrat, a democratic socialist and a communist?" ZOHRAN: "I'm a democratic socialist who's also a Democrat. I explain it in the words of Dr. King from decades ago, who said Call it democracy or call it democratic socialism. There must be a better distribution of wealth for all of god's children in this country."

The Patriot Oasis™

1,736,410 görüntüleme • 9 ay önce

Vigeland: One of the things about this trump era is that we have completely lost track of what civic engagement should be, and what it means to be a leader in somebody that stands in front of a podium and represents this country. Between calling reporters piggies, between spouting off conspiracism all the time,

Vigeland: One of the things about this trump era is that we have completely lost track of what civic engagement should be, and what it means to be a leader in somebody that stands in front of a podium and represents this country. Between calling reporters piggies, between spouting off conspiracism all the time,

Acyn

66,381 görüntüleme • 8 ay önce

🚨JUST NOW: Lara Trump just TRUTH NUKED the insanity of the "No Kings" protests "It should surprise absolutely nobody—the same group that doesn't understand the meaning of FASCISM and who also CAN'T DEFINE what a WOMAN is; doesn't understand what a KING is."

🚨JUST NOW: Lara Trump just TRUTH NUKED the insanity of the "No Kings" protests "It should surprise absolutely nobody—the same group that doesn't understand the meaning of FASCISM and who also CAN'T DEFINE what a WOMAN is; doesn't understand what a KING is."

The Patriot Oasis™

500,289 görüntüleme • 10 ay önce

62% of young Americans like socialism. Most don’t know what socialism is. They think China is successful socialism. China is not socialist. China is capitalist. When China was socialist, the Great Leap Forward killed upwards of 55 million. We have a major education problem.

62% of young Americans like socialism. Most don’t know what socialism is. They think China is successful socialism. China is not socialist. China is capitalist. When China was socialist, the Great Leap Forward killed upwards of 55 million. We have a major education problem.

Kaizen D. Asiedu

757,952 görüntüleme • 12 gün önce

Klaus Schwab argues that—in the face of AI's rapid evolution—we must redefine what it means to be human. "If human doesn't mean anymore to be intelligent, then we have to define humanity in different ways."

Klaus Schwab argues that—in the face of AI's rapid evolution—we must redefine what it means to be human. "If human doesn't mean anymore to be intelligent, then we have to define humanity in different ways."

Wide Awake Media

30,622 görüntüleme • 7 ay önce

Rosie O’Donnell: “It should be embarrassing to be a billionaire. It should be embarrassing to have the ability to help society and choose not to. How much can you have?”

Rosie O’Donnell: “It should be embarrassing to be a billionaire. It should be embarrassing to have the ability to help society and choose not to. How much can you have?”

Marco Foster

115,341 görüntüleme • 4 ay önce

Told Bannon’s WarRoom that if the US position in Islamabad truly was zero enrichment, we should not be surprised that the talks failed; we should be surprised that that was the US strategy. It raises questions about the sincerity of the talks.

Told Bannon’s WarRoom that if the US position in Islamabad truly was zero enrichment, we should not be surprised that the talks failed; we should be surprised that that was the US strategy. It raises questions about the sincerity of the talks.

Trita Parsi

45,006 görüntüleme • 4 ay önce