Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

Возникла проблема при загрузке этого видео. Это может быть связано с временными проблемами сети или видео может быть недоступно.

На главную

-No pre-flight check? -Forced takeoff -Power failure (both engines failed, highly unlikely) -Flaps not extended -Landing gear still deployed -Nose pitched up Numerous questions and observations, very difficult to pinpoint the cause, but this is undoubtedly a deeply tragic event

Mohsin Ali

48,461 subscribers

110,055 просмотров • 1 год назад •via X (Twitter)

Спорт Новости и политика Наука и технологии

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

Комментарии: 11

Фото профиля Indian Rafale Slayer

Indian Rafale Slayer1 год назад

As expected indian pilots 🤡

Фото профиля American Stories Network

American Stories Network1 год назад

Only the strong survive. 💪 Who will conquer the challenges and rise to the top? Tune in and find out! #SurvivingMann #UltimateCompetitor #NavySEALs #SpecOps #TacticalTraining

Фото профиля AmnaH

AmnaH1 год назад

Pilot error mainly that’s what other pilots and aviation analysts are saying.

Фото профиля Vanta Logik

Vanta Logik1 год назад

Black box. The flight recorder anyone? Can someone please find that and show its revealings to all the aviation experts online?

Фото профиля سلیم عام شہری

سلیم عام شہری1 год назад

Now indians will understand the meaning of the center of gravity 😎💥 #planecrash #Ahmedabad

Фото профиля الحمدللہ @

الحمدللہ @1 год назад

Seems Pilot error more than any other cause

Фото профиля carpe diem

carpe diem1 год назад

Landing great still down coz it was on take off segment. Nose pitch up because even in crash landing the aim is always to touch the rear end of plane and main wheels. Something is seriously wrong with these Boeings

Фото профиля Ahmed

Ahmed1 год назад

So the "Real Question" is, Indian govt will blame Pakistan for hijacking the plane or smthg? Or will they accept it as a technical failure or pilot's mistake?

Фото профиля Adil

Adil1 год назад

Involvement of Pakistan?

Фото профиля Maaz Ul Haq 🇵🇰

Maaz Ul Haq 🇵🇰1 год назад

Seems like the pilot was not in his senses

Фото профиля The Curious Philanthropist 🇵🇰🍁

The Curious Philanthropist 🇵🇰🍁1 год назад

Perfect case study of corruption + incompetence + negligence.

Похожие видео

#WATCH | Air India Plane Crash | Noida, UP: Former Pilot Ehsan Khalid says, "... The Flight Data Recorder, Cockpit Voice Recorder and the ACARS data will tell exactly what may have happened. The visuals show that the aircraft went down while flying. Which means there was no mid-air explosion... The visuals show that the aircraft faced a loss of power... The loss of power can be due to engine malfunction, but it is very unlikely that both engines would lose power simultaneously... It is a very big engine, and it is rare that both engines lose power due to a bird hit in a one-minute duration... The pilot gave a mayday call. This means that the failure was seen in the cockpit... They went airborne while combating that failure... I don't understand why the landing gear was still down... The landing gear is raised as soon as the flight takes off... Since the landing gear was down, it is possible that a loss of engine was detected beforehand... There are many variables, and any speculation would be unjust... The biggest question is why the landing gear was not up. The flight was at a height of 600 feet... Whether it was one problem or multiple problems, no one can say anything yet..."

#WATCH | Air India Plane Crash | Noida, UP: Former Pilot Ehsan Khalid says, "... The Flight Data Recorder, Cockpit Voice Recorder and the ACARS data will tell exactly what may have happened. The visuals show that the aircraft went down while flying. Which means there was no mid-air explosion... The visuals show that the aircraft faced a loss of power... The loss of power can be due to engine malfunction, but it is very unlikely that both engines would lose power simultaneously... It is a very big engine, and it is rare that both engines lose power due to a bird hit in a one-minute duration... The pilot gave a mayday call. This means that the failure was seen in the cockpit... They went airborne while combating that failure... I don't understand why the landing gear was still down... The landing gear is raised as soon as the flight takes off... Since the landing gear was down, it is possible that a loss of engine was detected beforehand... There are many variables, and any speculation would be unjust... The biggest question is why the landing gear was not up. The flight was at a height of 600 feet... Whether it was one problem or multiple problems, no one can say anything yet..."

ANI

529,175 просмотров • 1 год назад

When the Nose Gear Never Came Down! ✈️The crew of this Boeing 727 tried extending the Nose Gear but did not receive a down and locked indication, leaving them with only one option, to perform a controlled nose gear-up landing! The pilots executed a very smooth landing, maintaining the aircraft on its main wheels before the nose gradually settled onto the runway, bringing the Jet safely to a stop. Incredible Skills by the crew 🔥

When the Nose Gear Never Came Down! ✈️The crew of this Boeing 727 tried extending the Nose Gear but did not receive a down and locked indication, leaving them with only one option, to perform a controlled nose gear-up landing! The pilots executed a very smooth landing, maintaining the aircraft on its main wheels before the nose gradually settled onto the runway, bringing the Jet safely to a stop. Incredible Skills by the crew 🔥

Aviation Reporter

50,760 просмотров • 18 дней назад

This is an Erickson Aero Tanker MD-87 flying with the landing gear down while fighting a wildfire. It may look unusual, but there is a reason for it. The extended landing gear creates significant drag, meaning the pilots need to maintain a higher power setting. That is important because the MD-87's engines can have a relatively long spool-up time when operating at low thrust fighting wildfires. If more power is suddenly needed, waiting for the engines to accelerate can cost valuable seconds. By keeping the engines at a higher power setting while using the landing gear to create additional drag, the aircraft remains closer to its maximum available thrust. This can significantly reduce the time needed to reach full power. A well-known technique when rapid power changes matter. Also, the way the second chase aircraft is following so closely is incredible to watch. 📹: Even_Kiwi_1166

This is an Erickson Aero Tanker MD-87 flying with the landing gear down while fighting a wildfire. It may look unusual, but there is a reason for it. The extended landing gear creates significant drag, meaning the pilots need to maintain a higher power setting. That is important because the MD-87's engines can have a relatively long spool-up time when operating at low thrust fighting wildfires. If more power is suddenly needed, waiting for the engines to accelerate can cost valuable seconds. By keeping the engines at a higher power setting while using the landing gear to create additional drag, the aircraft remains closer to its maximum available thrust. This can significantly reduce the time needed to reach full power. A well-known technique when rapid power changes matter. Also, the way the second chase aircraft is following so closely is incredible to watch. 📹: Even_Kiwi_1166

Turbine Traveller

336,735 просмотров • 7 дней назад

The Boeing 777 was the first Boeing commercial airliner to feature a full digital fly-by-wire (FBW) flight control system. Powering this 777-300ER are the GE90 engines—the world's most powerful commercial jet engines. Each engine has a fan diameter so large that it is wider than the fuselage of a Boeing 737. After engine start, the hydraulic systems come to life, and the flight crew performs the flight control surfaces check. You can see the rudder, elevators, slats, and flaps moving before being configured for takeoff. Once both engines are running and supplying electrical and pneumatic power, the APU is shut down, causing the APU air intake door to close. B777-300ER (5Y-KZX) KQ100 Nairobi to London 8½ hrs.

The Boeing 777 was the first Boeing commercial airliner to feature a full digital fly-by-wire (FBW) flight control system. Powering this 777-300ER are the GE90 engines—the world's most powerful commercial jet engines. Each engine has a fan diameter so large that it is wider than the fuselage of a Boeing 737. After engine start, the hydraulic systems come to life, and the flight crew performs the flight control surfaces check. You can see the rudder, elevators, slats, and flaps moving before being configured for takeoff. Once both engines are running and supplying electrical and pneumatic power, the APU is shut down, causing the APU air intake door to close. B777-300ER (5Y-KZX) KQ100 Nairobi to London 8½ hrs.

Turbine Traveller

47,623 просмотров • 10 дней назад

AIR INDIA 787 ‘thoughts’ I’m surprised nobody, even the experts) have mentioned this… The 787 Dreamliner (all variants) has an ‘Air Ground Sensing’ system that opens the Main Gear doors immediately upon leaving the runway and prior to the (Flight Deck) Lever being moved manually to the ‘up’ position. I’ve witnessed this literally hundreds of times when filming The 787 and it’s clear on the footage attached: upon rotate, about one second from wheels off ground, the main Gear Doors open. Then, around three to four seconds (pilot discretion) Positive Rate is called/agreed and the Gear Lever is moved to the UP position. On a side note, the 787 is quite prone to brake malfunction, mostly down to the electric brake system that can fail from time to time on a single (or more) wheel. If the wheels are not retracted within a given amount of time due to a wheel continuing to spin, the gear doors will close back-up until the wheel(s) stop spinning and the gear is recycled at which time the doors will re-open and the gear will retract fully. This is the takeoff/gear-up procedure with all 787s. This is quite clearly not the case when observing the CCTV footage of the doomed Air India jet. I think it’s quite evident there was some kind of (electrical?) malfunction with the system(s). The question of the Flap (takeoff) Setting is still a mystery as, with poor quality footage, it’s difficult to completely confirm whether the flaps were extended or not. In my personal opinion they were not extended. There was a CNN reporter right next to one of the wings on the ground. Although it was heavily charred, it would’ve been clear to see if they were extended or not 🤷🏼‍♂️ Also, as for possible (engine) ingestion/failure, whether by birds or other FOD, there is no evidence of engine Compressor Stall, which is very clear to see in many videos online when it does happen with bird strikes, especially at rotate power/speed. The engine(s) will ‘pop’ flames out of the back. What is evident, is that the Jet uses all of the available runway, which is clear by the amount of dust being kicked-up on rotate. The Jet never seems to reach the optimal takeoff angle, right from the rotate point it appears to struggle, which would suggest either engine power issues or, as mentioned, the lack of lift from the Flaps/Slats. Witness accounts say there was a distinct lack of engine noise coming from the jet, which backs-up some theories of engine failure. You would expect, even with a lack of Flap setting the pilot would be able to increase to max (TOGA) power to give them some chance of climbing or at least gaining enough altitude to get themselves back to the airfield or to a safer (crash) landing zone. That ‘power up’ would be evident with black exhaust from the engines, but that didn’t happen - at all. You’ll see/hear from the (second part) footage I’ve filmed, that the engine sound is very evident at this height and that this climb-out is too Standard Operating Procedures. Personally I find it hard to believe the NFP would make such a rookie mistake as to raise the flaps (push and move the staggered lever) as opposed to the gear lever which is a simple up-down motion. The two levers are also in completely different positions: Gear lever on the facing panel and flap lever (with many settings) next to the throttles. Plus this is such a basic procedure that even the most rookie pilot wouldn’t make this mistake 🤷🏼‍♂️ Again, this is just my opinion and observations based on visual and actual experiences. The CVR and FDR will deliver the final evidence.

AIR INDIA 787 ‘thoughts’ I’m surprised nobody, even the experts) have mentioned this… The 787 Dreamliner (all variants) has an ‘Air Ground Sensing’ system that opens the Main Gear doors immediately upon leaving the runway and prior to the (Flight Deck) Lever being moved manually to the ‘up’ position. I’ve witnessed this literally hundreds of times when filming The 787 and it’s clear on the footage attached: upon rotate, about one second from wheels off ground, the main Gear Doors open. Then, around three to four seconds (pilot discretion) Positive Rate is called/agreed and the Gear Lever is moved to the UP position. On a side note, the 787 is quite prone to brake malfunction, mostly down to the electric brake system that can fail from time to time on a single (or more) wheel. If the wheels are not retracted within a given amount of time due to a wheel continuing to spin, the gear doors will close back-up until the wheel(s) stop spinning and the gear is recycled at which time the doors will re-open and the gear will retract fully. This is the takeoff/gear-up procedure with all 787s. This is quite clearly not the case when observing the CCTV footage of the doomed Air India jet. I think it’s quite evident there was some kind of (electrical?) malfunction with the system(s). The question of the Flap (takeoff) Setting is still a mystery as, with poor quality footage, it’s difficult to completely confirm whether the flaps were extended or not. In my personal opinion they were not extended. There was a CNN reporter right next to one of the wings on the ground. Although it was heavily charred, it would’ve been clear to see if they were extended or not 🤷🏼‍♂️ Also, as for possible (engine) ingestion/failure, whether by birds or other FOD, there is no evidence of engine Compressor Stall, which is very clear to see in many videos online when it does happen with bird strikes, especially at rotate power/speed. The engine(s) will ‘pop’ flames out of the back. What is evident, is that the Jet uses all of the available runway, which is clear by the amount of dust being kicked-up on rotate. The Jet never seems to reach the optimal takeoff angle, right from the rotate point it appears to struggle, which would suggest either engine power issues or, as mentioned, the lack of lift from the Flaps/Slats. Witness accounts say there was a distinct lack of engine noise coming from the jet, which backs-up some theories of engine failure. You would expect, even with a lack of Flap setting the pilot would be able to increase to max (TOGA) power to give them some chance of climbing or at least gaining enough altitude to get themselves back to the airfield or to a safer (crash) landing zone. That ‘power up’ would be evident with black exhaust from the engines, but that didn’t happen - at all. You’ll see/hear from the (second part) footage I’ve filmed, that the engine sound is very evident at this height and that this climb-out is too Standard Operating Procedures. Personally I find it hard to believe the NFP would make such a rookie mistake as to raise the flaps (push and move the staggered lever) as opposed to the gear lever which is a simple up-down motion. The two levers are also in completely different positions: Gear lever on the facing panel and flap lever (with many settings) next to the throttles. Plus this is such a basic procedure that even the most rookie pilot wouldn’t make this mistake 🤷🏼‍♂️ Again, this is just my opinion and observations based on visual and actual experiences. The CVR and FDR will deliver the final evidence.

BIG JET TV

1,728,473 просмотров • 1 год назад

🚨#BREAKING: Watch as a NASA research jet made a belly landing when it bursted into flames at after its landing gear apparently failed to deploy 📌#Houston | #Texas Watch wild footage captured after a NASA WB-57 research aircraft was forced to make a belly landing at Ellington Airport in Houston, Texas, after its landing gear reportedly failed to deploy when it landed flames and sparks can be seen coming from the jet. Emergency responders quickly rushed to the scene as the pilot safely exited the cockpit. NASA later confirmed that a mechanical issue led to a gear-up landing involving one of its WB-57 aircraft. All crew members are safe, and no injuries were reported. Officials say a full investigation into the cause of the incident is underway, with updates to be released as more information becomes available.

🚨#BREAKING: Watch as a NASA research jet made a belly landing when it bursted into flames at after its landing gear apparently failed to deploy 📌#Houston | #Texas Watch wild footage captured after a NASA WB-57 research aircraft was forced to make a belly landing at Ellington Airport in Houston, Texas, after its landing gear reportedly failed to deploy when it landed flames and sparks can be seen coming from the jet. Emergency responders quickly rushed to the scene as the pilot safely exited the cockpit. NASA later confirmed that a mechanical issue led to a gear-up landing involving one of its WB-57 aircraft. All crew members are safe, and no injuries were reported. Officials say a full investigation into the cause of the incident is underway, with updates to be released as more information becomes available.

R A W S A L E R T S

528,888 просмотров • 6 месяцев назад

This is shocking and deeply disappointing. I had immense respect for Sri Sri. Both he and Sadhguru have done great work for Sanatana Dharma. But Sri Sri’s attempts to sabotage Sadhguru from within are harming the very cause he claim to serve. This is a Dharma Yuddha- you’re either with Dharma or against it. Tragic to see where Sri Sri stands.

This is shocking and deeply disappointing. I had immense respect for Sri Sri. Both he and Sadhguru have done great work for Sanatana Dharma. But Sri Sri’s attempts to sabotage Sadhguru from within are harming the very cause he claim to serve. This is a Dharma Yuddha- you’re either with Dharma or against it. Tragic to see where Sri Sri stands.

Gargi #Decolonization 🇮🇳

28,859 просмотров • 1 год назад

Another ill-fated take-off over V1 (in this case, V2!) June 13 1996: Garuda Indonesia Flight 865, a DC-10, crashes in Fukuoka (Japan) 3 of 275 aboard die. On take-off, the jet had just left the ground when one of the engines failed. Crew opted to reject the maneuver; the aircraft was unable to stop safely and left the runway: landing gear collapsed, and the airplane caught fire. Inquiry noted pilot actions by aborting takeoff above V1, where SOP dictated pilots should have continued takeoff and deal with the engine later. More info below from Aviation Safety Network – Aftermath video is from Aircrashdaily (go give them a follow on YouTube) “The DC-10 accelerated for takeoff. The nose was raised, and at a speed of 158 kts, the first officer called "Rotate". It was 12:07:40. Three seconds later, at a radio altitude of 9 feet, a fan blade of the 1st stage HP turbine from the no. 3 engine separated. The N1 dropped to 23,7% within a few seconds. At 12:07:45, the flight engineer called "Engine failure number one." Takeoff was aborted at about the V2 speed, and the airplane contacted the runway one second later at a vertical acceleration force of 2.1 Gs. The thrust reversers were deployed and ground spoilers were extended. The DC-10 skidded off the runway through a ditch, fence and a road, before coming to a halt 620 m past the runway threshold. Investigation revealed that the turbine blade that failed, had operated for 30913 hours and 6182 cycles. General Electric had advised customers to discard blades after about 6000 cycles. Accident cause Although the Aircraft was well in excess of V1 and the aircraft had already lifted off from the runway, the takeoff was aborted. Consequently, the aircraft departed the end of the runway, came to rest and caught fire. It is estimated that contributing to the rejection of the takeoff under this circumstance was the fact that the CAP's judgement in the event of the engine failure was inadequate."

Another ill-fated take-off over V1 (in this case, V2!) June 13 1996: Garuda Indonesia Flight 865, a DC-10, crashes in Fukuoka (Japan) 3 of 275 aboard die. On take-off, the jet had just left the ground when one of the engines failed. Crew opted to reject the maneuver; the aircraft was unable to stop safely and left the runway: landing gear collapsed, and the airplane caught fire. Inquiry noted pilot actions by aborting takeoff above V1, where SOP dictated pilots should have continued takeoff and deal with the engine later. More info below from Aviation Safety Network – Aftermath video is from Aircrashdaily (go give them a follow on YouTube) “The DC-10 accelerated for takeoff. The nose was raised, and at a speed of 158 kts, the first officer called "Rotate". It was 12:07:40. Three seconds later, at a radio altitude of 9 feet, a fan blade of the 1st stage HP turbine from the no. 3 engine separated. The N1 dropped to 23,7% within a few seconds. At 12:07:45, the flight engineer called "Engine failure number one." Takeoff was aborted at about the V2 speed, and the airplane contacted the runway one second later at a vertical acceleration force of 2.1 Gs. The thrust reversers were deployed and ground spoilers were extended. The DC-10 skidded off the runway through a ditch, fence and a road, before coming to a halt 620 m past the runway threshold. Investigation revealed that the turbine blade that failed, had operated for 30913 hours and 6182 cycles. General Electric had advised customers to discard blades after about 6000 cycles. Accident cause Although the Aircraft was well in excess of V1 and the aircraft had already lifted off from the runway, the takeoff was aborted. Consequently, the aircraft departed the end of the runway, came to rest and caught fire. It is estimated that contributing to the rejection of the takeoff under this circumstance was the fact that the CAP's judgement in the event of the engine failure was inadequate."

Francisco Cunha

157,331 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

What a tragic loss😭😭 This was caused by a power outage. The light went off during the night and the farmer woke up to this. Farming is not for the weak, but that shouldn't discourage you. There's no business without risks!!!

What a tragic loss😭😭 This was caused by a power outage. The light went off during the night and the farmer woke up to this. Farming is not for the weak, but that shouldn't discourage you. There's no business without risks!!!

NaijaFarmer

4,879,238 просмотров • 7 месяцев назад

The third fully domestic prototype of the Sukhoi Superjet 100 regional airliner, developed by the United Aircraft Corporation (UAC), has successfully completed its maiden flight at the Komsomolsk-on-Amur Aircraft Plant. The test flight lasted approximately 40 minutes, reaching altitudes of up to 3,000 meters and speeds of up to 500 km/h. The aircraft demonstrated excellent controllability and stability throughout the flight. This prototype is equipped with Russian-made PD-8 engines developed by the United Engine Corporation (UEC), replacing the previous Franco-Russian SaM146 units. In addition to the new engines, the aircraft features domestically produced avionics, landing gear, auxiliary power unit, control systems, electrical systems, air conditioning, fire protection systems, and more. It also boasts a newly designed fuselage with structural modifications aimed at streamlining both production and maintenance.

The third fully domestic prototype of the Sukhoi Superjet 100 regional airliner, developed by the United Aircraft Corporation (UAC), has successfully completed its maiden flight at the Komsomolsk-on-Amur Aircraft Plant. The test flight lasted approximately 40 minutes, reaching altitudes of up to 3,000 meters and speeds of up to 500 km/h. The aircraft demonstrated excellent controllability and stability throughout the flight. This prototype is equipped with Russian-made PD-8 engines developed by the United Engine Corporation (UEC), replacing the previous Franco-Russian SaM146 units. In addition to the new engines, the aircraft features domestically produced avionics, landing gear, auxiliary power unit, control systems, electrical systems, air conditioning, fire protection systems, and more. It also boasts a newly designed fuselage with structural modifications aimed at streamlining both production and maintenance.

OSINTWarfare

14,516 просмотров • 1 год назад

🚨 BIOHAZARD DECLARED MID-AIR - FLIGHT FORCED INTO EMERGENCY DIVERSION A packed Frontier flight traveling from El Salvador to Atlanta spiraled into chaos at 35,000 feet after a complete bathroom failure turned into a biohazard situation mid-air. Passengers say they were informed after boarding that only ONE bathroom was working on the aircraft. Mid-flight, someone threw up in the sink, rendering the last restroom unusable and leaving 100+ passengers with ZERO working toilets on an international flight. With no way to resolve the situation and passengers unable to hold it any longer, the crew declared a biohazard and made the call to DIVERT THE PLANE TO CANCUN. Not because of weather. Not because of a mechanical failure. All due to a biohazard caused by failed bathrooms. This happened in international airspace with an unplanned landing in another country. All because basic systems broke down. Is this acceptable air travel, or has flying officially turned into survival mode?

🚨 BIOHAZARD DECLARED MID-AIR - FLIGHT FORCED INTO EMERGENCY DIVERSION A packed Frontier flight traveling from El Salvador to Atlanta spiraled into chaos at 35,000 feet after a complete bathroom failure turned into a biohazard situation mid-air. Passengers say they were informed after boarding that only ONE bathroom was working on the aircraft. Mid-flight, someone threw up in the sink, rendering the last restroom unusable and leaving 100+ passengers with ZERO working toilets on an international flight. With no way to resolve the situation and passengers unable to hold it any longer, the crew declared a biohazard and made the call to DIVERT THE PLANE TO CANCUN. Not because of weather. Not because of a mechanical failure. All due to a biohazard caused by failed bathrooms. This happened in international airspace with an unplanned landing in another country. All because basic systems broke down. Is this acceptable air travel, or has flying officially turned into survival mode?

HustleBitch

41,890 просмотров • 6 месяцев назад

on April 30, 1966, XB-70 (AV-2) Valkyrie pilots Al White and Joe Cotton faced disaster when the nose gear jammed after takeoff due to a short-circuit. After failed touch-and-gos to jar it loose, ground engineers diagnosed a faulty circuit breaker. With no tools aboard, Cotton grabbed a binder paperclip from his briefcase, shorted the breaker mid-flight-extending the gear. The malfunction caused hydraulic pressure to remain on 3 of the 4 main wheel brakes which led to the burn up of the Valkyrie main landing gear tires. Serious damage was avoided and the aircraft was able to fly again two weeks later. Tragically, AV-2 would be lost just weeks later in a midair collision with an F-104 chase plane.🫡

on April 30, 1966, XB-70 (AV-2) Valkyrie pilots Al White and Joe Cotton faced disaster when the nose gear jammed after takeoff due to a short-circuit. After failed touch-and-gos to jar it loose, ground engineers diagnosed a faulty circuit breaker. With no tools aboard, Cotton grabbed a binder paperclip from his briefcase, shorted the breaker mid-flight-extending the gear. The malfunction caused hydraulic pressure to remain on 3 of the 4 main wheel brakes which led to the burn up of the Valkyrie main landing gear tires. Serious damage was avoided and the aircraft was able to fly again two weeks later. Tragically, AV-2 would be lost just weeks later in a midair collision with an F-104 chase plane.🫡

Tim Farmer

519,254 просмотров • 6 месяцев назад

#WATCH | Ahmedabad Plane Crash | Former Union Minister of Civil Aviation, Praful Patel says, "It is a very tragic and a very sad day. We are all very concerned and worried that such an accident has taken place. Our condolences to the victims and their families. I hope for the speedy recovery if there are any survivors...This accident - how and why it took place, is a very surprising thing because 787 Dreamliner is a very technically advanced aircraft. There are thousands of Dreamliners flying all over the world by many airlines. There is no reason to doubt about the aircraft itself. If the accident has taken place, only the black-box will reveal what is the real reason, why things went wrong. The Captain did give a 'Mayday' call but we must also remember that the aircraft flew from Delhi to Ahmedabad and obviously there was no snag, otherwise the Captain would not have decided to fly from Ahmedabad to London which is a very long flight and there is no reason to even consider because the Pilot would have done pre-flight checks. On every flight, there is a pre-flight check and between the Captain and Second-in-command do all the checks to ascertain whether the plane is fly-worthy. So, in this case, for a 9 and a half hour flight, everything was in place. What went wrong only an investigation can reveal."

#WATCH | Ahmedabad Plane Crash | Former Union Minister of Civil Aviation, Praful Patel says, "It is a very tragic and a very sad day. We are all very concerned and worried that such an accident has taken place. Our condolences to the victims and their families. I hope for the speedy recovery if there are any survivors...This accident - how and why it took place, is a very surprising thing because 787 Dreamliner is a very technically advanced aircraft. There are thousands of Dreamliners flying all over the world by many airlines. There is no reason to doubt about the aircraft itself. If the accident has taken place, only the black-box will reveal what is the real reason, why things went wrong. The Captain did give a 'Mayday' call but we must also remember that the aircraft flew from Delhi to Ahmedabad and obviously there was no snag, otherwise the Captain would not have decided to fly from Ahmedabad to London which is a very long flight and there is no reason to even consider because the Pilot would have done pre-flight checks. On every flight, there is a pre-flight check and between the Captain and Second-in-command do all the checks to ascertain whether the plane is fly-worthy. So, in this case, for a 9 and a half hour flight, everything was in place. What went wrong only an investigation can reveal."

ANI

23,318 просмотров • 1 год назад

#BREAKING SpiceJet Delhi–Leh flight declares full emergency, returns to base after engine fails, fire seen mid-air Passengers left stranded at the airport, say they were given no clarity or updates The SpiceJet flight SG 121 was forced to return to Delhi just six minutes after takeoff following an engine failure. The technical problem shortly after departure prompted the crew to initiate an emergency landing The aircraft landed safely at Delhi Airport, around 150 passengers were disembarked normally Videos shared by a passenger on social media showed flames and sparks appearing to come from one of the engines mid-air, triggering panic Sources said engine number 2 had failed, though the airline maintained there was no fire warning in cockpit

#BREAKING SpiceJet Delhi–Leh flight declares full emergency, returns to base after engine fails, fire seen mid-air Passengers left stranded at the airport, say they were given no clarity or updates The SpiceJet flight SG 121 was forced to return to Delhi just six minutes after takeoff following an engine failure. The technical problem shortly after departure prompted the crew to initiate an emergency landing The aircraft landed safely at Delhi Airport, around 150 passengers were disembarked normally Videos shared by a passenger on social media showed flames and sparks appearing to come from one of the engines mid-air, triggering panic Sources said engine number 2 had failed, though the airline maintained there was no fire warning in cockpit

Nabila Jamal

10,479 просмотров • 5 месяцев назад

A preventable tragedy On This Day in 1967: Stockport air disaster (England). A British Midland C-4 [G-ALHG] crashes in Stockport, 72 of 84 aboard die. On a go-around, crew lost control after 2 engines failed. Investigation traced the issues to a known - but never addressed - design issue in the fuel system. More details here by ASN (video is from British Pathé) PROBABLE CAUSE: "The immediate cause of the accident was loss of power of both engines on the starboard side, resulting in control problems which prevented the pilot from maintaining height on the available power with one propeller windmilling. The loss of power of the first engine was due to fuel starvation due to inadvertent fuel transfer in flight. The loss of power of the second engine was due either to fuel starvation resulting from inadvertent fuel transfer in flight or to misidentification by the crew of which engine had failed followed by failure to restore power in time to the engine misidentified as having failed. Contributory causes of the accident were: (a) The design of the fuel valves and location in the cockpit of their actuating levers, so that a failure by the pilot correctly to position the lever by an amount so small as to be easy to do and difficult to recognize would result in inadvertent fuel transfer on a scale sufficient to involve the risk after a long flight of a tank expected to contain sufficient fuel being in fact empty. (b) Failure of those responsible for the design of the fuel system or the fuel valves to warn users that failure by a small amount to place the actuating levers in the proper position would result in inadvertent fuel transfer on a scale involving this risk after a long flight. (c) Failure of British Midland's air crew or engineers to recognize the possibility of inadvertent fuel transfer in the air from the evidence available in previous incidents in flight and contained in the fuel logs. (d) Failure of other operators of Argonauts who had learned by experience of the possibility of inadvertent fuel transfer in flight to inform the Air Registration Board, the Directorate of Flight Safety of the Board of Trade or its predecessors, or the United Kingdom Flight Safety Committee of the facts which they had learned so that these might be communicated to other operators of Argonauts and other aircraft equipped with similar systems and fuel cocks."

A preventable tragedy On This Day in 1967: Stockport air disaster (England). A British Midland C-4 [G-ALHG] crashes in Stockport, 72 of 84 aboard die. On a go-around, crew lost control after 2 engines failed. Investigation traced the issues to a known - but never addressed - design issue in the fuel system. More details here by ASN (video is from British Pathé) PROBABLE CAUSE: "The immediate cause of the accident was loss of power of both engines on the starboard side, resulting in control problems which prevented the pilot from maintaining height on the available power with one propeller windmilling. The loss of power of the first engine was due to fuel starvation due to inadvertent fuel transfer in flight. The loss of power of the second engine was due either to fuel starvation resulting from inadvertent fuel transfer in flight or to misidentification by the crew of which engine had failed followed by failure to restore power in time to the engine misidentified as having failed. Contributory causes of the accident were: (a) The design of the fuel valves and location in the cockpit of their actuating levers, so that a failure by the pilot correctly to position the lever by an amount so small as to be easy to do and difficult to recognize would result in inadvertent fuel transfer on a scale sufficient to involve the risk after a long flight of a tank expected to contain sufficient fuel being in fact empty. (b) Failure of those responsible for the design of the fuel system or the fuel valves to warn users that failure by a small amount to place the actuating levers in the proper position would result in inadvertent fuel transfer on a scale involving this risk after a long flight. (c) Failure of British Midland's air crew or engineers to recognize the possibility of inadvertent fuel transfer in the air from the evidence available in previous incidents in flight and contained in the fuel logs. (d) Failure of other operators of Argonauts who had learned by experience of the possibility of inadvertent fuel transfer in flight to inform the Air Registration Board, the Directorate of Flight Safety of the Board of Trade or its predecessors, or the United Kingdom Flight Safety Committee of the facts which they had learned so that these might be communicated to other operators of Argonauts and other aircraft equipped with similar systems and fuel cocks."

Francisco Cunha

24,189 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

The name on one of the crew might ring a bell... June 19 1947: Pan Am Flight 121, a Constellation, crash-lands in Mayadine (Syria). 14 of 36 aboard die. In flight, the #1 engine failed due to a mechanical issue. Attempting to divert to an alternate airport, the #2 engine also failed. The crew made a belly landing in the desert, where the aircraft caught fire. Among the survivors was a dead heading 3rd officer named Gene Roddenberry, who would go on to create the iconic science fiction television series “Star Trek”. This was Roddenbery´s 2nd major plane crash, having survived another major accident during his service in the Pacific Theatre, during WW2 Accident description from ASN (One of many period accidents where an engine failure led to a fatal crash. Nowadays, an engine fail is nearly routine and at worst it causes a diversion...) "The Constellation, named "Clipper Eclipse", was cruising at FL185 when the no. 1 prop had to be feathered due to engine problems. The remaining three engines overheated, forcing the crew to reduced power. This resulted in a gradual descent. The crew elected to continue to Istanbul instead of landing at the nearby Habbaniya RAF Station in Iraq. While descending through FL100 a fire broke out in the engine no. 2 nacelle. A rapid descent was started during which the no. 2 engine separated from the wing. With the left wing on fire a belly landing was carried out in the desert. It appeared the no. 1 engine failure was due to a broken exhaust rocker arm on the no.18 cylinder. The no. 2 engine failure was due to a failure of the thrust bearing which in turn resulted in blocking the passage of oil from the propeller feathering motor to the propeller dome. PROBABLE CAUSE: "The Board determines that the probable cause of this accident was a fire which resulted from an attempt to feather the No. 2 propeller after the failure of the No. 2 engine thrust bearing."

The name on one of the crew might ring a bell... June 19 1947: Pan Am Flight 121, a Constellation, crash-lands in Mayadine (Syria). 14 of 36 aboard die. In flight, the #1 engine failed due to a mechanical issue. Attempting to divert to an alternate airport, the #2 engine also failed. The crew made a belly landing in the desert, where the aircraft caught fire. Among the survivors was a dead heading 3rd officer named Gene Roddenberry, who would go on to create the iconic science fiction television series “Star Trek”. This was Roddenbery´s 2nd major plane crash, having survived another major accident during his service in the Pacific Theatre, during WW2 Accident description from ASN (One of many period accidents where an engine failure led to a fatal crash. Nowadays, an engine fail is nearly routine and at worst it causes a diversion...) "The Constellation, named "Clipper Eclipse", was cruising at FL185 when the no. 1 prop had to be feathered due to engine problems. The remaining three engines overheated, forcing the crew to reduced power. This resulted in a gradual descent. The crew elected to continue to Istanbul instead of landing at the nearby Habbaniya RAF Station in Iraq. While descending through FL100 a fire broke out in the engine no. 2 nacelle. A rapid descent was started during which the no. 2 engine separated from the wing. With the left wing on fire a belly landing was carried out in the desert. It appeared the no. 1 engine failure was due to a broken exhaust rocker arm on the no.18 cylinder. The no. 2 engine failure was due to a failure of the thrust bearing which in turn resulted in blocking the passage of oil from the propeller feathering motor to the propeller dome. PROBABLE CAUSE: "The Board determines that the probable cause of this accident was a fire which resulted from an attempt to feather the No. 2 propeller after the failure of the No. 2 engine thrust bearing."

Francisco Cunha

56,655 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

Gov. Spanberger: "In his farewell address, George Washington warned us about the possibility of 'cunning, ambitious, and unprincipled men' rising to power. But he also encouraged us, all Americans, to unite in a common cause to move this nation forward. That is our charge once more, and that is what we are seeing across the country. It is deeply American and patriotic to do so, and it is how we ensure that the state of our union remains strong, not just this year, but for the next 250 years as well. Because we, the people, have the power to make change, the power to stand up for what is right, the power to demand more of our nation."

Gov. Spanberger: "In his farewell address, George Washington warned us about the possibility of 'cunning, ambitious, and unprincipled men' rising to power. But he also encouraged us, all Americans, to unite in a common cause to move this nation forward. That is our charge once more, and that is what we are seeing across the country. It is deeply American and patriotic to do so, and it is how we ensure that the state of our union remains strong, not just this year, but for the next 250 years as well. Because we, the people, have the power to make change, the power to stand up for what is right, the power to demand more of our nation."

The Bulwark

56,334 просмотров • 5 месяцев назад

This is VT-ANB, a Boeing 787-8 Dreamliner, captured here gracefully taxiing for takeoff at Kansai Airport, Japan—11 years ago. 🎥: akino33 Today, this very aircraft was involved in the tragic crash of Air India flight AI171, marking the first-ever hull loss of the Boeing 787-8. 💔 Flight #AI171 was en route from Ahmedabad (AMD) to London Gatwick (LGW) on June 12, 2025, when disaster struck shortly after takeoff. VT-ANB, bearing MSN 36279 / LN 26, first took to the skies on December 14, 2013, and was delivered to Air India on January 31, 2014. It was powered by two GE GEnx-1B engines and had served the airline faithfully for over a decade. Our thoughts are with the passengers, crew, families, and all those affected by this heartbreaking event.🕊️💐

This is VT-ANB, a Boeing 787-8 Dreamliner, captured here gracefully taxiing for takeoff at Kansai Airport, Japan—11 years ago. 🎥: akino33 Today, this very aircraft was involved in the tragic crash of Air India flight AI171, marking the first-ever hull loss of the Boeing 787-8. 💔 Flight #AI171 was en route from Ahmedabad (AMD) to London Gatwick (LGW) on June 12, 2025, when disaster struck shortly after takeoff. VT-ANB, bearing MSN 36279 / LN 26, first took to the skies on December 14, 2013, and was delivered to Air India on January 31, 2014. It was powered by two GE GEnx-1B engines and had served the airline faithfully for over a decade. Our thoughts are with the passengers, crew, families, and all those affected by this heartbreaking event.🕊️💐

Turbine Traveller

1,486,234 просмотров • 1 год назад

❗️✈️🇰🇷 - Death toll from plane crash in South Korea rises to 47, more than 130 people still missing. The incident occurred when a Jeju Air flight, carrying 181 passengers and crew from Bangkok, veered off the runway upon landing, colliding with a barrier and bursting into flames. As rescue operations continue, more than 130 people remain missing, with emergency services working tirelessly to sift through the wreckage. The plane, identified as a Boeing 737, had a landing gear malfunction, which led to the catastrophic event. Initial reports suggest that a possible bird strike may have contributed to the equipment failure, although this has not yet been confirmed by official investigations.

❗️✈️🇰🇷 - Death toll from plane crash in South Korea rises to 47, more than 130 people still missing. The incident occurred when a Jeju Air flight, carrying 181 passengers and crew from Bangkok, veered off the runway upon landing, colliding with a barrier and bursting into flames. As rescue operations continue, more than 130 people remain missing, with emergency services working tirelessly to sift through the wreckage. The plane, identified as a Boeing 737, had a landing gear malfunction, which led to the catastrophic event. Initial reports suggest that a possible bird strike may have contributed to the equipment failure, although this has not yet been confirmed by official investigations.

🔥🗞The Informant

1,400,502 просмотров • 1 год назад

This video is highly manipulative. The mother purposely fails to mention that her son was illegally armed and an alleged criminal. Law enforcement investigators do not just pick up random people without cause. There must be a very compelling reason behind their actions. Also refrain from mentioning the President’s name . You failed your son let him afunzwe na ulimwengu.

This video is highly manipulative. The mother purposely fails to mention that her son was illegally armed and an alleged criminal. Law enforcement investigators do not just pick up random people without cause. There must be a very compelling reason behind their actions. Also refrain from mentioning the President’s name . You failed your son let him afunzwe na ulimwengu.

Bakhita Esther

33,516 просмотров • 1 месяц назад