Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

На главную

Nobody at this table expected where this conversation would go. It starts as a debate about what "adult" meant in the 7th century, then shifts to scripture, and suddenly every voice is wrestling with the same hard question: how do we judge history without losing our compassion for the...

23,358 просмотров • 18 дней назад •via X (Twitter)

Комментарии: 6

Фото профиля Donna Bristow
Donna Bristow18 дней назад

That is so disgusting!!! And it's not from God!

Фото профиля Hannibal Weber
Hannibal Weber18 дней назад

Jillian, how do you think this is gonna go down?You understand history, i've seen the people who you've had on your show.And unfortunately, it's gonna come down to a kinetic conflict

Фото профиля ForgechainOS
ForgechainOS18 дней назад

Legal maturity is all that matters - Today

Фото профиля Dorene Shaver worked for years/umass hosp
Dorene Shaver worked for years/umass hosp18 дней назад

Discusting and scary

Фото профиля Jim
Jim18 дней назад

Didn’t you torture people int he biggest loser

Фото профиля HectorP
HectorP18 дней назад

Once 1/4 to a 1/3 of a population is low trust, the society as a whole becomes low trust. Extrapolate that concept to the jihadist and jihadist-adjacent members of the Muslim population.

Похожие видео

I asked Garry Tan how to use meta prompting to get better at AI: "My partners at YC Jared Friedman and Pete Koomen showed me how to do this. You can take almost anything that you do all the time and just drop it into a context window. And then say, “Here’s a bunch of inputs and outputs." And maybe you also add a bunch of notes. And then you tell it, “Write me a prompt that can act as an agent that takes this input and makes this output over here.” You can do this for almost any type of knowledge work. And you can even introspect. "What are things you notice that I did to convert this from the input to the output?”. And then you can just start using the prompt. Initially, it’s going to suck. Because it’s just not that smart yet. But what’s funny is now, I also use it to Iterate my writing. You can be very direct, "I would never say that", "Don’t say it like this", or "Oh, you used the long word there, use the short word". Just speak to it conversationally. And then when you're happy with the output, you can use that new output to make a new prompt. "Based on this conversation, give me a better initial prompt that incorporates all the things we talked about." And you can do this with literally everything. And in theory, there’s so much it applies to that people do day-to-day. You could use it for tweets. You could use it for editing podcasts. You can use it for pretty much everything. I have a folder of prompts that I use all the time. My YouTube prompt is on v27 or something. I'll go through this process with all the different max models. I'll use GPT 5.2 Pro. I’ll use Grok. I'll use Claude. Then, I’ll take all the outputs from all the models and put them into Claude and say "Here’s my prompt, here’s the output from four LLMs, including yourself. Rate each response and tell me what the pros and cons of each approach are." And I usually say "give it to me in numbered form". And then you can agree with one, disagree with two, tell it three is this or that. And then after that, you say given all of this, synthesize it."

The Peel

51,632 просмотров • 7 месяцев назад