Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Zur Startseite

Not only is this completely wrong, but it’s negligent and potentially harmful. An isokinetic dynamometer is the gold standard for assessing force production and how quickly you can produce that force, which is vital for reducing the risk of injury. A single leg squat doesn’t come close to reproducing...

E3Rehab's profile picture

E3Rehab

19,074 subscribers

115,038 Aufrufe • vor 2 Jahren •via X (Twitter)

LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

9 Kommentare

Profilbild von E3Rehab
E3Rehabvor 2 Jahren

We have a podcast episode with @erikMeira all about ACL rehab:

Profilbild von E3Rehab
E3Rehabvor 2 Jahren

We have another podcast episode all about the 2023 Aspetar Clinical Practice Guideline on Rehabilitation after ACL Reconstruction with @RoulaKotsifaki

Profilbild von E3Rehab
E3Rehabvor 2 Jahren

@RoulaKotsifaki And ANOTHER podcast episode all about ACL rehab with Wesley Wang who primarily sees this population of athletes on a daily basis.

Profilbild von E3Rehab
E3Rehabvor 2 Jahren

We have a FREE 30 minute video all about ACL Rehab:

Profilbild von PTJD1717
PTJD1717vor 2 Jahren

I use as many tests as I can.

Profilbild von Ephealth
Ephealthvor 2 Jahren

Only reason why it's gold standard because how expensive it is. The person who makes the Golden rule holds the gold. Simple test that measures the distance and grading the landing jump can also prevent injury.

Profilbild von Jamal
Jamalvor 2 Jahren

The original video makes total sense, you wanna test a movement test it functionally, not by expensive product researchers use. Not to mention their outstanding clinical experience 😉

Profilbild von Timothy C. Sell, PT, PhD
Timothy C. Sell, PT, PhDvor 2 Jahren

My favorite part of the isokinetic testing in the video is the improper set-up. Let me know if you see it.

Profilbild von Linda Truong // LT
Linda Truong // LTvor 2 Jahren

So you’re saying you disagree? And ignore squat PT?! Coming form sportskongres where we are having tons convo on isokinetic and other measures of functional perf……

Ähnliche Videos

PRIORITIZE SINGLE LEG STRENGTH❗️ Squat & Deadlift do NOT always have to be your main lower body lifts. There are plenty of ways to get strong. Here are some MAJOR benefits of prioritizing single leg lifts: 1️⃣ Exposes strength & balance inefficiencies & inequalities. Strong on 2 legs doesn’t mean strong on 1 leg.. Strong on each leg does mean strong on 2 legs. I’ve seen enough strong squats & deadlifts get buried with single leg exercises. Typically isn’t true the other way around. 2️⃣ Less back pain. Regardless of their technique, some athletes experience back pain from squatting & deadlifting. YOU DO NOT NEED TO SQUAT OR DEADLIFT TO GET STRONG… Single leg exercises can alleviate that pain. Less load, similar intensities, similar benefits. 3️⃣ “Sports are played on 1 leg.” I’ve heard this plenty of times and there is definitely a ton of truth to it. Movements are very single leg dependent. Sprinting, stopping, changing direction, jumping, landing. Single leg training can be the key to higher performance and less risk for injury. 4️⃣ Less learning curve. Beginners can immediately reap the rewards of single leg training because of how easy it is to implement. Something as simple as sitting on a bench and standing up using 1 leg is challenging for someone who has never done it. No bar on the back, no picking up weight, no teaching hip hinge.. Simple single leg training will buy athletes time to train while simultaneously improving squat and deadlift technique.
0:49

PRIORITIZE SINGLE LEG STRENGTH❗️ Squat & Deadlift do NOT always have to be your main lower body lifts. There are plenty of ways to get strong. Here are some MAJOR benefits of prioritizing single leg lifts: 1️⃣ Exposes strength & balance inefficiencies & inequalities. Strong on 2 legs doesn’t mean strong on 1 leg.. Strong on each leg does mean strong on 2 legs. I’ve seen enough strong squats & deadlifts get buried with single leg exercises. Typically isn’t true the other way around. 2️⃣ Less back pain. Regardless of their technique, some athletes experience back pain from squatting & deadlifting. YOU DO NOT NEED TO SQUAT OR DEADLIFT TO GET STRONG… Single leg exercises can alleviate that pain. Less load, similar intensities, similar benefits. 3️⃣ “Sports are played on 1 leg.” I’ve heard this plenty of times and there is definitely a ton of truth to it. Movements are very single leg dependent. Sprinting, stopping, changing direction, jumping, landing. Single leg training can be the key to higher performance and less risk for injury. 4️⃣ Less learning curve. Beginners can immediately reap the rewards of single leg training because of how easy it is to implement. Something as simple as sitting on a bench and standing up using 1 leg is challenging for someone who has never done it. No bar on the back, no picking up weight, no teaching hip hinge.. Simple single leg training will buy athletes time to train while simultaneously improving squat and deadlift technique.

Tim Cortazzo

56,620 Aufrufe • vor 2 Jahren

Knee cave is good for glutes? 😱 This video is bound to upset some people. A new study directly examined knee cave a.k.a. knee valgus vs pushing knees out in a squat on muscle activations# well as forces acting on the knee The researchers found MORE glute activation when the participants cued knee cave vs knees out where they saw more adductor activation. This may seem strange since a lot of exercises for the glutes utilize knees out. But these are typically exercising involving abduction, not squats Not only that, but they found the forces on the knee during knee cave were not even close to the level required to cause knee injury I am NOT saying you should purposefully valgus, but if you have strong glutes & you find that your knees naturally track in during heavy squats, you are probably better off training all your sets that way so that those tissues appropriately adapt, rather than squatting how you ‘think’ you ‘should’ on lighter sets only to have them cave in on heavy sets A perfect real life example of this is my friend Lya Bavoil, current world record holder of a 225kg squat in the 69kg class (496 lb squat at around 152 lbs body weight for my Americans who hate math) drug free. Her knees have always caved during squat. This is likely BECAUSE she has such strong glutes (she also deadlifts well over 500 lbs) so her body naturally goes into the position where she is strongest. She’s also never hurt her knees 🤷🏼‍♂️ If you don’t knee valgus naturally during squats don’t make yourself do it but if you find you still have some knee cave even though your glutes are strong, I wouldn’t worry too much about it unless you consistently find it painful It’s time to let go of these dogmatic ideas around ‘perfect’ form. Perfect form is the form for the INDIVIDUAL that allows them to perform best without pain DATA>your feelings
1:29

Knee cave is good for glutes? 😱 This video is bound to upset some people. A new study directly examined knee cave a.k.a. knee valgus vs pushing knees out in a squat on muscle activations# well as forces acting on the knee The researchers found MORE glute activation when the participants cued knee cave vs knees out where they saw more adductor activation. This may seem strange since a lot of exercises for the glutes utilize knees out. But these are typically exercising involving abduction, not squats Not only that, but they found the forces on the knee during knee cave were not even close to the level required to cause knee injury I am NOT saying you should purposefully valgus, but if you have strong glutes & you find that your knees naturally track in during heavy squats, you are probably better off training all your sets that way so that those tissues appropriately adapt, rather than squatting how you ‘think’ you ‘should’ on lighter sets only to have them cave in on heavy sets A perfect real life example of this is my friend Lya Bavoil, current world record holder of a 225kg squat in the 69kg class (496 lb squat at around 152 lbs body weight for my Americans who hate math) drug free. Her knees have always caved during squat. This is likely BECAUSE she has such strong glutes (she also deadlifts well over 500 lbs) so her body naturally goes into the position where she is strongest. She’s also never hurt her knees 🤷🏼‍♂️ If you don’t knee valgus naturally during squats don’t make yourself do it but if you find you still have some knee cave even though your glutes are strong, I wouldn’t worry too much about it unless you consistently find it painful It’s time to let go of these dogmatic ideas around ‘perfect’ form. Perfect form is the form for the INDIVIDUAL that allows them to perform best without pain DATA>your feelings

Layne Norton, PhD

36,568 Aufrufe • vor 2 Jahren

🚨 DHS lied again.🚨 They claimed ICE agents only used force after a driver on Chicago’s Southeast Side tried to flee and rammed into their vehicle. But security footage tells a different story. The video shows agents initiating the collision…not defending themselves. Which matters, because using a vehicle to forcibly stop someone is only legal if that person poses an immediate danger to others or is a violent felon on the run. So why lie? Because it’s not about safety. It’s about covering for reckless, untrained agents using excessive force in crowded neighborhoods, putting innocent people, cars, and property at risk. ICE agents are making Chicago less safe for everyone.
0:36

🚨 DHS lied again.🚨 They claimed ICE agents only used force after a driver on Chicago’s Southeast Side tried to flee and rammed into their vehicle. But security footage tells a different story. The video shows agents initiating the collision…not defending themselves. Which matters, because using a vehicle to forcibly stop someone is only legal if that person poses an immediate danger to others or is a violent felon on the run. So why lie? Because it’s not about safety. It’s about covering for reckless, untrained agents using excessive force in crowded neighborhoods, putting innocent people, cars, and property at risk. ICE agents are making Chicago less safe for everyone.

Jesus Freakin Congress

427,028 Aufrufe • vor 11 Monaten

Staggered Romanian Deadlift might be superior to single leg RDL. Heavy staggered RDL’s are a quasi-unilateral option that reduces some of the problems of the often-challenging single leg RDL. Much like single leg squatting, the single leg RDL is limited by the athlete’s ability to maintain stability which in turn robs us of meaningful force production or overload, which is tricky with the contralateral brace required and bar’s movement. To overcome this problem, I started using the staggered RDL. Take a small step into a staggered stance, with both knees unlocked, and use the rear leg to stabilize–either on the ball of the foot or with the foot flat on the floor. It’s quicker to master load and advance than SLRDL. With the heavy staggered RDL, the target of the movement will be the lead leg which has the greatest stretch. Here with ProGolfer Borja Virto ETPI
0:22

Staggered Romanian Deadlift might be superior to single leg RDL. Heavy staggered RDL’s are a quasi-unilateral option that reduces some of the problems of the often-challenging single leg RDL. Much like single leg squatting, the single leg RDL is limited by the athlete’s ability to maintain stability which in turn robs us of meaningful force production or overload, which is tricky with the contralateral brace required and bar’s movement. To overcome this problem, I started using the staggered RDL. Take a small step into a staggered stance, with both knees unlocked, and use the rear leg to stabilize–either on the ball of the foot or with the foot flat on the floor. It’s quicker to master load and advance than SLRDL. With the heavy staggered RDL, the target of the movement will be the lead leg which has the greatest stretch. Here with ProGolfer Borja Virto ETPI

Coach Wayland | Performance Expert | Craftsman

37,506 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

$GOOG's Ruth Porat says the biggest risk in the AI buildout is the ROI question, and focusing on short-term tactics at the cost of building a great company. "I think the biggest risk for everyone is when the question is asked, which it often is, how do you get to an ROI? That's going to force our teams to do something short-term and tactical. You can always do a cost cut to get something to drop to the bottom line, and that is not a way to build a great company." "So I think the risk is don't be so in the moment maniacally focused on what is it, but have a right mix of an engine that's continuing to drive the business, which also explains why you need to start building early for growth so that you can grow into it." ____ Follow Fireside Alpha for more daily highlights of key business and technology conversations.
0:32

$GOOG's Ruth Porat says the biggest risk in the AI buildout is the ROI question, and focusing on short-term tactics at the cost of building a great company. "I think the biggest risk for everyone is when the question is asked, which it often is, how do you get to an ROI? That's going to force our teams to do something short-term and tactical. You can always do a cost cut to get something to drop to the bottom line, and that is not a way to build a great company." "So I think the risk is don't be so in the moment maniacally focused on what is it, but have a right mix of an engine that's continuing to drive the business, which also explains why you need to start building early for growth so that you can grow into it." ____ Follow Fireside Alpha for more daily highlights of key business and technology conversations.

Fireside Alpha

38,443 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

Thank you Bryan Johnson. Jefferson is amazing. I will try to summarize the general dunk formula right now: 1. Height is a huge factor 2. Genetic jumping starting point 3. Age and injury history Then I would say 2 main things go missed: 1. Not being able to palm a ball is a huge barrier - not only to putting the ball through the rim, but holding back the JUMP INTENT itself. A small or foam ball (and even low rim if needed) can be a breakthrough to BECOMING A GOOD JUMPER. Getting well up over the rim is the first step and you can get better quality jumps without holding a ball. 2. A full squat. Think Wemby, 7+ feet tall, no chance genetically to be an Olympic weightlifter but then the top Olympic weightlifter of all time, pound for pound, is like 5’5” and no chance blocking Webmy’s dunk - and so FULL SQUAT tends to go missing! It gets overlooked. But I’ve seen NOTHING come close to how much it SUPPORTS dunk goal, because it strengthens legs AND KNEES. It’s almost like the worse you are at full squat, the more potential is waiting for you. For dunking, knee is NOT #1 power but knee PAIN is #1 BARRIER. Even in pro dunking you’ll now find the majority full squat. I personally coached many of them 8 years ago and it changed dunking, behind the scenes, forever. I’m not saying to work through pain. Here and on a weekly basis I post pain-free full squat strategy. 3. Similarly, seated calf machine goes underrated for extra Achilles support. So if we recap: Dunk is largely your starting point you can’t do anything about. But you can do a LOT with uninhibited jumping - that means neither ball nor knee pain or Achilles pain holding you back. Then, yes, any other power method is valid and can further boost! Doesn’t help that from 1970s to today, in many textbooks, “NO KNEE OVER TOES / NO FULL SQUAT” was forced on millions of students, despite no long-term research, which now shows that mistake.
0:04

Thank you Bryan Johnson. Jefferson is amazing. I will try to summarize the general dunk formula right now: 1. Height is a huge factor 2. Genetic jumping starting point 3. Age and injury history Then I would say 2 main things go missed: 1. Not being able to palm a ball is a huge barrier - not only to putting the ball through the rim, but holding back the JUMP INTENT itself. A small or foam ball (and even low rim if needed) can be a breakthrough to BECOMING A GOOD JUMPER. Getting well up over the rim is the first step and you can get better quality jumps without holding a ball. 2. A full squat. Think Wemby, 7+ feet tall, no chance genetically to be an Olympic weightlifter but then the top Olympic weightlifter of all time, pound for pound, is like 5’5” and no chance blocking Webmy’s dunk - and so FULL SQUAT tends to go missing! It gets overlooked. But I’ve seen NOTHING come close to how much it SUPPORTS dunk goal, because it strengthens legs AND KNEES. It’s almost like the worse you are at full squat, the more potential is waiting for you. For dunking, knee is NOT #1 power but knee PAIN is #1 BARRIER. Even in pro dunking you’ll now find the majority full squat. I personally coached many of them 8 years ago and it changed dunking, behind the scenes, forever. I’m not saying to work through pain. Here and on a weekly basis I post pain-free full squat strategy. 3. Similarly, seated calf machine goes underrated for extra Achilles support. So if we recap: Dunk is largely your starting point you can’t do anything about. But you can do a LOT with uninhibited jumping - that means neither ball nor knee pain or Achilles pain holding you back. Then, yes, any other power method is valid and can further boost! Doesn’t help that from 1970s to today, in many textbooks, “NO KNEE OVER TOES / NO FULL SQUAT” was forced on millions of students, despite no long-term research, which now shows that mistake.

KneeOverToesGuy

70,031 Aufrufe • vor 23 Tagen

Lp(a) is the new Voldemort of cardiology—a genetically determined risk factor that can raise your risk of heart disease by 200–300%. And while elevated Lp(a) is largely written into your DNA, there’s some surprisingly good news: You may be able to neutralize its risk by dropping visceral fat. Research suggests that a low waist-to-hip ratio (a proxy for low visceral fat) can significantly blunt—or even offset—the cardiovascular risk associated with high Lp(a). In other words: You might not be able to change your genes—but you can change how much they matter. If you want to go deeper, check out the letters linked below where I break down the research and exactly how to reduce visceral fat.
1:21

Lp(a) is the new Voldemort of cardiology—a genetically determined risk factor that can raise your risk of heart disease by 200–300%. And while elevated Lp(a) is largely written into your DNA, there’s some surprisingly good news: You may be able to neutralize its risk by dropping visceral fat. Research suggests that a low waist-to-hip ratio (a proxy for low visceral fat) can significantly blunt—or even offset—the cardiovascular risk associated with high Lp(a). In other words: You might not be able to change your genes—but you can change how much they matter. If you want to go deeper, check out the letters linked below where I break down the research and exactly how to reduce visceral fat.

Nick Norwitz MD PhD

13,550 Aufrufe • vor 6 Monaten

Obama on recursive self improvement and the risks associated with it. When he talks about the urgency for us all to have a say in how this technology evolves and how it is overseen, this is part of the reason why: “The models are going to get smarter and smarter and better and better at a much faster pace, at an exponential pace. What are the risks of that? There’s the big science fiction risk, wow, these models get smarter than us, and they decide humans are fine, but not necessary. They start setting their own goals, and the killer robots kill us, or we bow down to them. I do not want to exaggerate that particular risk, but I will say there is a non-zero risk of non-zero chance of that happening, but that’s not actually the risk that I’m most concerned about, although it’s the risk that gets most attention. And the reason that’s a risk is not because the computer models are conscious, necessarily. It doesn’t mean that they are necessarily feel malice towards humans. It’s just that if they start setting their own agendas, you may get a misalignment between what they want to do and what we want them to do, and that gap can be dangerous. That’s problem number one. The more serious problem is these models are getting powerful enough that if they get in the hands of bad humans, they can do bad things. They can be weaponized in certain ways. They can do a lot of mischief.”
1:49

Obama on recursive self improvement and the risks associated with it. When he talks about the urgency for us all to have a say in how this technology evolves and how it is overseen, this is part of the reason why: “The models are going to get smarter and smarter and better and better at a much faster pace, at an exponential pace. What are the risks of that? There’s the big science fiction risk, wow, these models get smarter than us, and they decide humans are fine, but not necessary. They start setting their own goals, and the killer robots kill us, or we bow down to them. I do not want to exaggerate that particular risk, but I will say there is a non-zero risk of non-zero chance of that happening, but that’s not actually the risk that I’m most concerned about, although it’s the risk that gets most attention. And the reason that’s a risk is not because the computer models are conscious, necessarily. It doesn’t mean that they are necessarily feel malice towards humans. It’s just that if they start setting their own agendas, you may get a misalignment between what they want to do and what we want them to do, and that gap can be dangerous. That’s problem number one. The more serious problem is these models are getting powerful enough that if they get in the hands of bad humans, they can do bad things. They can be weaponized in certain ways. They can do a lot of mischief.”

Jason Goldman

962,193 Aufrufe • vor 15 Tagen

"The reality is this: Ukraine is fighting for us. It’s not just fighting for itself. The reason so many countries are involved in Ukraine’s defense is because the aggression being committed by Russia is not only an aggression against Ukraine and its people; it’s an aggression against the very principles that are at the heart of the international system and that are necessary for trying to maintain peace and stability," Antony Blinken said during a press availability in Italy following the meeting of G7 member countries.
1:00

"The reality is this: Ukraine is fighting for us. It’s not just fighting for itself. The reason so many countries are involved in Ukraine’s defense is because the aggression being committed by Russia is not only an aggression against Ukraine and its people; it’s an aggression against the very principles that are at the heart of the international system and that are necessary for trying to maintain peace and stability," Antony Blinken said during a press availability in Italy following the meeting of G7 member countries.

Anton Gerashchenko

140,527 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

They told us Tylenol was harmless. Now Harvard research shows an 80% spike in autism risk when used in pregnancy. But for newborns—it’s even worse. Dr. Brian Hooker: ‘So the dose that you're looking at during pregnancy that the unborn child is actually sustaining and having to detox is much less than the dose that the newborn is sustaining because the mom is not there to detox Tylenol.’ This should be front-page news. Watch more from Brian Hooker, PhD on #CHDTV 👇
1:15

They told us Tylenol was harmless. Now Harvard research shows an 80% spike in autism risk when used in pregnancy. But for newborns—it’s even worse. Dr. Brian Hooker: ‘So the dose that you're looking at during pregnancy that the unborn child is actually sustaining and having to detox is much less than the dose that the newborn is sustaining because the mom is not there to detox Tylenol.’ This should be front-page news. Watch more from Brian Hooker, PhD on #CHDTV 👇

Children’s Health Defense

167,086 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

Officers are supposed to be trained to use only the amount of force that is reasonably necessary to make an arrest or protect life — not to break people’s arms, shoot them, or kill them when there is no immediate threat. When a person is unarmed and not posing a clear danger, the law does not give officers a blank check to use extreme, injuring force; that kind of conduct can violate both department policy and the Constitution. In a situation like this, the focus should be on why de‑escalation and safer control techniques were not used, and why an arrest ended with a serious injury instead of a safe resolution.
1:38

Officers are supposed to be trained to use only the amount of force that is reasonably necessary to make an arrest or protect life — not to break people’s arms, shoot them, or kill them when there is no immediate threat. When a person is unarmed and not posing a clear danger, the law does not give officers a blank check to use extreme, injuring force; that kind of conduct can violate both department policy and the Constitution. In a situation like this, the focus should be on why de‑escalation and safer control techniques were not used, and why an arrest ended with a serious injury instead of a safe resolution.

Lee Merritt

14,059 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten

🚨The Only Way that it Can STOP is if the BRICS Countries 🚨Jeffrey Sachs: Trump is DELUSIONAL and he is a MEGALOMANIC. 🚨But on top of that, behind him is the CIA and Mossad. 🚨So this is not Trump alone. These are grandiose ideas, longstanding. So it's not only Trump, but there's no break. There's no foot on the brake. This is only an accelerator towards expanded war right now. And the only way that it can stop is if the BRICS countries, and that means India, that means Brazil, that means Russia, that means China, South Africa and others, and it's Iran, which is a member of the BRICS, says this is not the way the world can work. They have to stand up to American hegemony. This is the only way the world canAmerican hegemony. This is the only way the world can be safe. And so this is actually a responsibility of the BRICS right now, which is the only standing bulwark against America's global empire.
1:12

🚨The Only Way that it Can STOP is if the BRICS Countries 🚨Jeffrey Sachs: Trump is DELUSIONAL and he is a MEGALOMANIC. 🚨But on top of that, behind him is the CIA and Mossad. 🚨So this is not Trump alone. These are grandiose ideas, longstanding. So it's not only Trump, but there's no break. There's no foot on the brake. This is only an accelerator towards expanded war right now. And the only way that it can stop is if the BRICS countries, and that means India, that means Brazil, that means Russia, that means China, South Africa and others, and it's Iran, which is a member of the BRICS, says this is not the way the world can work. They have to stand up to American hegemony. This is the only way the world canAmerican hegemony. This is the only way the world can be safe. And so this is actually a responsibility of the BRICS right now, which is the only standing bulwark against America's global empire.

Ignorance, the root and stem of all evil

15,189 Aufrufe • vor 7 Monaten

How to Create Rotation With the Back Leg How you want to actually create rotation with the back leg. For me and higher level guys, I don’t even like to think about rotation. If you feel your hips rotating, it’s probably too slow. This is such a violent, explosive movement that happens in milliseconds. You shouldn’t even be able to feel it. That’s why I think about it as a weight shift. When you’re putting force into the ground, into that X direction, most of your weight is on the back leg. Then once you create that impulse and it propels you forward, all you need to think about is getting to the front leg. That force naturally rotates the hips into foot plant. For a lot of higher level guys, this helps a lot. They don’t have to think about rotating the hips. Because that can actually mess things up. Instead, it’s just force into the ground and get to the front leg. The pelvis will rotate on its own.
0:47

How to Create Rotation With the Back Leg How you want to actually create rotation with the back leg. For me and higher level guys, I don’t even like to think about rotation. If you feel your hips rotating, it’s probably too slow. This is such a violent, explosive movement that happens in milliseconds. You shouldn’t even be able to feel it. That’s why I think about it as a weight shift. When you’re putting force into the ground, into that X direction, most of your weight is on the back leg. Then once you create that impulse and it propels you forward, all you need to think about is getting to the front leg. That force naturally rotates the hips into foot plant. For a lot of higher level guys, this helps a lot. They don’t have to think about rotating the hips. Because that can actually mess things up. Instead, it’s just force into the ground and get to the front leg. The pelvis will rotate on its own.

Josh Gessner

14,028 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten

Reminder, this video is an old one. The reason why we share it is so that you can see the oppression committed by the Zionists against the Jews, which is not shown in the mainstream media. Zionists beat a young Jew to death during worship. Zionists constantly attack yeshivas and persecute Jews. They are trying to force Jews to become Zionists. Jews are attacked by the state of Israel because of their beliefs.
0:22

Reminder, this video is an old one. The reason why we share it is so that you can see the oppression committed by the Zionists against the Jews, which is not shown in the mainstream media. Zionists beat a young Jew to death during worship. Zionists constantly attack yeshivas and persecute Jews. They are trying to force Jews to become Zionists. Jews are attacked by the state of Israel because of their beliefs.

Voice of Rabbis

481,703 Aufrufe • vor 3 Jahren

Can a person have an alien leg? YES. Limb levitation in corticobasal syndrome is something we see commonly in an expert clinic. This video and report shows involuntary movements of the right leg “alien leg”. In order for the patient to stand up the doctor had to stand on his right foot to hold it in place. The ‘‘alien foot’’ is rarer and the authors point out that foot involvement can lead to erroneous localization of the clinical problem to the knee, hip, or back.''
0:34

Can a person have an alien leg? YES. Limb levitation in corticobasal syndrome is something we see commonly in an expert clinic. This video and report shows involuntary movements of the right leg “alien leg”. In order for the patient to stand up the doctor had to stand on his right foot to hold it in place. The ‘‘alien foot’’ is rarer and the authors point out that foot involvement can lead to erroneous localization of the clinical problem to the knee, hip, or back.''

Michael Okun

19,519 Aufrufe • vor 2 Jahren

Had TONS of coaches reach out via DM, text, and WhatsApp about the video from yesterday saying 1RM on split squat makes sense. Some even sent me videos. Here is one of them from John Waters John Waters Look at the beauty in this movement. In the interest of educating coaches on movements: 1.) yes there is a "bounce" here but it is no more bounce than you see when someone lifts a light weight on bench press. 2.) moving the back leg forward when standing up enforces the front leg does the work (not the back leg like those bad videos online) 3.) return on investment here = increased unilateral force production which is what happens in sports 4.) do bilateral, split, and unilateral training with your athletes to get the benefit of lifting various loads and having various levels of stability Do you have a great video of split squat or reverse lunge? If so - send it so we can share and highlight!
1:37

Had TONS of coaches reach out via DM, text, and WhatsApp about the video from yesterday saying 1RM on split squat makes sense. Some even sent me videos. Here is one of them from John Waters John Waters Look at the beauty in this movement. In the interest of educating coaches on movements: 1.) yes there is a "bounce" here but it is no more bounce than you see when someone lifts a light weight on bench press. 2.) moving the back leg forward when standing up enforces the front leg does the work (not the back leg like those bad videos online) 3.) return on investment here = increased unilateral force production which is what happens in sports 4.) do bilateral, split, and unilateral training with your athletes to get the benefit of lifting various loads and having various levels of stability Do you have a great video of split squat or reverse lunge? If so - send it so we can share and highlight!

StrengthCoachNetwork

44,409 Aufrufe • vor 10 Monaten

“Our founder's intent is not a close call open to equivocation. Pundits argue that presidents have been ignoring this restriction for many decades. That is not an argument but more of an excuse. The Constitution is clear—only Congress can declare war.” Check out the full floor speech about how I plan to vote Yes on the upcoming war powers resolution 👇.
14:17

“Our founder's intent is not a close call open to equivocation. Pundits argue that presidents have been ignoring this restriction for many decades. That is not an argument but more of an excuse. The Constitution is clear—only Congress can declare war.” Check out the full floor speech about how I plan to vote Yes on the upcoming war powers resolution 👇.

Senator Rand Paul

42,026 Aufrufe • vor 9 Monaten

🚨 "SECRET POLICE FORCE" - Governor Mikie Sherrill is LYING again, telling News12NJ that ICE is a "SECRET POLICE FORCE" who took an oath to a "President, not the Constitution." Not only is this EXTREMELY DANGEROUS rhetoric putting federal law enforcement at RISK, but also completely EMPTY of ACTION or TRUTH (as usual for Mrs. Sherrill.) Mrs. Sherrill will do NOTHING to stop the LEGAL enforcement of Immigration law because Under 8 U.S.C. § 1357 ICE officers CAN arrest someone in public without a warrant if they have reasonable belief that the person is in the U.S. illegally and is "likely to escape" before a warrant can be obtained. Mrs. Sherrill has a law degree, and knows this but she lies to YOU, the NJ Voter anyway. Interestingly enough, Leftists will defend illegal immigration by stating it is a CIVIL crime (which is true) yet since it is a CIVIL charge and not a CRIMINAL charge, that is what allows for these warrantless arrests to LEGALLY take place. Kind of backfired on them. 🇺🇸
2:17

🚨 "SECRET POLICE FORCE" - Governor Mikie Sherrill is LYING again, telling News12NJ that ICE is a "SECRET POLICE FORCE" who took an oath to a "President, not the Constitution." Not only is this EXTREMELY DANGEROUS rhetoric putting federal law enforcement at RISK, but also completely EMPTY of ACTION or TRUTH (as usual for Mrs. Sherrill.) Mrs. Sherrill will do NOTHING to stop the LEGAL enforcement of Immigration law because Under 8 U.S.C. § 1357 ICE officers CAN arrest someone in public without a warrant if they have reasonable belief that the person is in the U.S. illegally and is "likely to escape" before a warrant can be obtained. Mrs. Sherrill has a law degree, and knows this but she lies to YOU, the NJ Voter anyway. Interestingly enough, Leftists will defend illegal immigration by stating it is a CIVIL crime (which is true) yet since it is a CIVIL charge and not a CRIMINAL charge, that is what allows for these warrantless arrests to LEGALLY take place. Kind of backfired on them. 🇺🇸

Jay Costa

16,624 Aufrufe • vor 8 Monaten

It's not uncommon to find 15, or even 50, different organizations dedicated to a single rare disease. This is without a doubt holding the rare disease community back. The reality is that compared to more common diseases, rare diseases already face significant hurdles in accessing resources. This scarcity is amplified by the fragmentation of groups. Each organization, operating in isolation, struggles to gather sufficient patient data and biospecimens, which are crucial for advancing research and treatment options. Imagine the potential if these groups could unite their efforts. By combining resources, sharing data, and collaborating on research, we could accelerate progress in ways that are currently out of reach. How can we foster greater unity in the rare disease community? What steps can we take to ensure that every organization, family, and patient is part of a larger, more effective network? #MedTwitter
0:33

It's not uncommon to find 15, or even 50, different organizations dedicated to a single rare disease. This is without a doubt holding the rare disease community back. The reality is that compared to more common diseases, rare diseases already face significant hurdles in accessing resources. This scarcity is amplified by the fragmentation of groups. Each organization, operating in isolation, struggles to gather sufficient patient data and biospecimens, which are crucial for advancing research and treatment options. Imagine the potential if these groups could unite their efforts. By combining resources, sharing data, and collaborating on research, we could accelerate progress in ways that are currently out of reach. How can we foster greater unity in the rare disease community? What steps can we take to ensure that every organization, family, and patient is part of a larger, more effective network? #MedTwitter

David Fajgenbaum, MD

27,308 Aufrufe • vor 2 Jahren