Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

There was a problem loading this video. This could be due to a temporary network issue or the video might be unavailable.

Notice the windshield wipers still on at 0:44. Let’s be clear: returning to 1 Meadows was NEVER about “seeing the kids,” despite Bill Read’s blatant lies. This was a desperate search and rescue mission. They were there to quickly gain access to John’s bedroom, to retrieve the murder weapon... show more

Zona Eagle

1,661 subscribers

11,883 views • 3 months ago •via X (Twitter)

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

As promised during our live earlier today, here is the full video of Mr. O’Keefe cleaning off John’s Traverse. Karen Read provided Sean McDonough with a single snapshot from this longer video and tried to use it as “proof” that Mr. O’Keefe knew about, and was involved in, covering up damage to John’s vehicle allegedly caused by her 0.5 mph tap. But even the defense’s own expert testified during the first trial that a tap at that speed would not have caused the taillight damage we all saw - damage Karen herself admitted was there. Of course, that didn’t stop her. Instead, she pulled one brief moment from the video, stripped it of all context, and pushed it publicly to fit her narrative.

As promised during our live earlier today, here is the full video of Mr. O’Keefe cleaning off John’s Traverse. Karen Read provided Sean McDonough with a single snapshot from this longer video and tried to use it as “proof” that Mr. O’Keefe knew about, and was involved in, covering up damage to John’s vehicle allegedly caused by her 0.5 mph tap. But even the defense’s own expert testified during the first trial that a tap at that speed would not have caused the taillight damage we all saw - damage Karen herself admitted was there. Of course, that didn’t stop her. Instead, she pulled one brief moment from the video, stripped it of all context, and pushed it publicly to fit her narrative.

The FOURensic Room

48,599 views • 6 months ago

FKR continues to push the narrative that Karen Read’s passenger side taillight was intact in the picture attached and simply covered by snow. But thankfully Karen’s own father is here to help clear things up for them: This image is from a wellness check that took place at 1 Meadows around 8 AM on the morning of January 29, 2022. And here’s Bill Read himself confirming that yes, Karen’s taillight was already broken while her car was parked in the driveway at 1 Meadows WELL BEFORE the Massachusetts State Police ever took custody of her Lexus. ARCCA has stated that Karen Read bumping John O’Keefe’s vehicle around 5AM that morning at the speed she did would NOT have caused that damage to her taillight. So when did the damage occur? Facts matter. Just stop it.

FKR continues to push the narrative that Karen Read’s passenger side taillight was intact in the picture attached and simply covered by snow. But thankfully Karen’s own father is here to help clear things up for them: This image is from a wellness check that took place at 1 Meadows around 8 AM on the morning of January 29, 2022. And here’s Bill Read himself confirming that yes, Karen’s taillight was already broken while her car was parked in the driveway at 1 Meadows WELL BEFORE the Massachusetts State Police ever took custody of her Lexus. ARCCA has stated that Karen Read bumping John O’Keefe’s vehicle around 5AM that morning at the speed she did would NOT have caused that damage to her taillight. So when did the damage occur? Facts matter. Just stop it.

Jamz

30,271 views • 1 year ago

This woman was on the porch when her neighbor drove by scowling at her. Turns out the neighbor called the police on her for her rowdy pool party. It was just her kids splashing in a kiddie pool in the front yard trying to stay cool in the heat and having fun. The cops laughed it off and left. But at the end of the day she has to still live here with this woman across the street. Seeing that this wasn’t even close to being what she claimed to be, should they charge her for a false report or harassment?

This woman was on the porch when her neighbor drove by scowling at her. Turns out the neighbor called the police on her for her rowdy pool party. It was just her kids splashing in a kiddie pool in the front yard trying to stay cool in the heat and having fun. The cops laughed it off and left. But at the end of the day she has to still live here with this woman across the street. Seeing that this wasn’t even close to being what she claimed to be, should they charge her for a false report or harassment?

SonnyBoy🇺🇸

561,150 views • 4 months ago

This woman was trying to break into the fashion world. She and her photographer were going around NYC taking photographs that were bold and daring. She was in the process of taking this photo when a woman starts to yell at her about how she can’t work without looking out the window and seeing the young lady hanging onto the guard rail for a pose. She expressed she was worried she was going to fall. The young lady was more interested that the woman owns a magazine than she was about her own safety, she then proceeds to call her a Karen for their interaction. To me it seems like she was voicing honest concern, she wasn’t trying to cause an issue and it was in fact the actions of the young lady that was the cause of the distraction for those in the city that day. What is your take on this, was this a valid concern on the lady’s behalf?

This woman was trying to break into the fashion world. She and her photographer were going around NYC taking photographs that were bold and daring. She was in the process of taking this photo when a woman starts to yell at her about how she can’t work without looking out the window and seeing the young lady hanging onto the guard rail for a pose. She expressed she was worried she was going to fall. The young lady was more interested that the woman owns a magazine than she was about her own safety, she then proceeds to call her a Karen for their interaction. To me it seems like she was voicing honest concern, she wasn’t trying to cause an issue and it was in fact the actions of the young lady that was the cause of the distraction for those in the city that day. What is your take on this, was this a valid concern on the lady’s behalf?

SonnyBoy🇺🇸

47,640 views • 5 months ago

The tow truck driver not taking a photo of Karen’s damaged taillight always struck me as odd, especially considering this was supposedly the “murder weapon” he was transporting back to Canton from Dighton. In this obviously edited and manipulated Sallyport clip, the driver appears to exit the Lexus and move toward the rear to take a picture. Proctor intercepts him, and he changes direction to photograph the front license plate instead. What’s fascinating are the glitches: the driver freezes, appears to morph into two people, and there seems to be a visible time cut. Equally interesting is how the white light Coleen Crawford edited onto the unbroken driver-side taillight in the inverted video appears to morph onto the driver’s jacket. Proctor never sought Ring footage from any surrounding homes. Ring footage from Karen’s return to John’s was deleted in his custody. No third-party video evidence exists except for footage from Mr. Read’s home, which was noted as one of the reasons Karen was acquitted.

The tow truck driver not taking a photo of Karen’s damaged taillight always struck me as odd, especially considering this was supposedly the “murder weapon” he was transporting back to Canton from Dighton. In this obviously edited and manipulated Sallyport clip, the driver appears to exit the Lexus and move toward the rear to take a picture. Proctor intercepts him, and he changes direction to photograph the front license plate instead. What’s fascinating are the glitches: the driver freezes, appears to morph into two people, and there seems to be a visible time cut. Equally interesting is how the white light Coleen Crawford edited onto the unbroken driver-side taillight in the inverted video appears to morph onto the driver’s jacket. Proctor never sought Ring footage from any surrounding homes. Ring footage from Karen’s return to John’s was deleted in his custody. No third-party video evidence exists except for footage from Mr. Read’s home, which was noted as one of the reasons Karen was acquitted.

Lara

10,876 views • 3 months ago

John’s niece was just 14 years old when her uncle “JJ” passed away. She testified that she overheard an argument in early January, during which John told Karen their relationship “had run its course.” She also informed the jurors that her uncle had asked Karen to leave the house, but she refused to go and followed her uncle upstairs to his bedroom. When he refused to let Karen into the room, she began banging loudly on the door. During one of their disputes, John’s niece testified that her uncle left the house for a drive to cool off. She recounted hearing Karen on the phone telling John that his niece and nephew were worried about him. This was a blatant lie, as the teen clarified that she hadn’t even known her uncle had left the house until she overheard Karen’s call, and she wasn’t concerned at all up to that point. One has to wonder if this video clip was the time John’s niece was testifying about or if this is simply another glimpse in time where once again Karen had to end every argument in a way that served her own interests, leaving no room for anyone else’s voice. It’s so hard to watch.

John’s niece was just 14 years old when her uncle “JJ” passed away. She testified that she overheard an argument in early January, during which John told Karen their relationship “had run its course.” She also informed the jurors that her uncle had asked Karen to leave the house, but she refused to go and followed her uncle upstairs to his bedroom. When he refused to let Karen into the room, she began banging loudly on the door. During one of their disputes, John’s niece testified that her uncle left the house for a drive to cool off. She recounted hearing Karen on the phone telling John that his niece and nephew were worried about him. This was a blatant lie, as the teen clarified that she hadn’t even known her uncle had left the house until she overheard Karen’s call, and she wasn’t concerned at all up to that point. One has to wonder if this video clip was the time John’s niece was testifying about or if this is simply another glimpse in time where once again Karen had to end every argument in a way that served her own interests, leaving no room for anyone else’s voice. It’s so hard to watch.

Zona Eagle

41,435 views • 2 months ago

One aspect of Karen Read’s interview on the Rotten Mango podcast that deserves real appreciation is how open, honest, and raw she is. And this isn’t new because in every interview she’s given, she has shown up the same way. She has nothing to hide... because she did not kill John O’Keefe. Stephanie asked Karen a deeply personal question: if there were objects she could choose to speak for her, what would they be? Karen’s answer was simple and heartbreaking: rosary beads, specifically ones made from yellow roses taken from John’s casket. Karen was denied the opportunity to properly grieve or attend John’s services after the Norfolk County DA’s Office and Massachusetts State Police charged her with his murder. A standard condition of that charge is a stay-away order from the victim’s family, which was imposed on her. Her ability to mourn the man she loved was taken from her at the very moment she needed it most. We hadn’t heard this detail before, and it’s quietly comforting to know that even though Karen couldn’t physically be there to say goodbye, she still carries a small, sacred piece of John with her. I also find it incredibly telling that, out of all the things she could have named, her mind immediately went to something rooted in spirituality and her connection to John. No matter what anyone from the “other side” claims, this answer speaks volumes. Karen cared deeply for John and she still does. And she won’t stop fighting until John gets justice. 💙

One aspect of Karen Read’s interview on the Rotten Mango podcast that deserves real appreciation is how open, honest, and raw she is. And this isn’t new because in every interview she’s given, she has shown up the same way. She has nothing to hide... because she did not kill John O’Keefe. Stephanie asked Karen a deeply personal question: if there were objects she could choose to speak for her, what would they be? Karen’s answer was simple and heartbreaking: rosary beads, specifically ones made from yellow roses taken from John’s casket. Karen was denied the opportunity to properly grieve or attend John’s services after the Norfolk County DA’s Office and Massachusetts State Police charged her with his murder. A standard condition of that charge is a stay-away order from the victim’s family, which was imposed on her. Her ability to mourn the man she loved was taken from her at the very moment she needed it most. We hadn’t heard this detail before, and it’s quietly comforting to know that even though Karen couldn’t physically be there to say goodbye, she still carries a small, sacred piece of John with her. I also find it incredibly telling that, out of all the things she could have named, her mind immediately went to something rooted in spirituality and her connection to John. No matter what anyone from the “other side” claims, this answer speaks volumes. Karen cared deeply for John and she still does. And she won’t stop fighting until John gets justice. 💙

BoozeyBeauty

24,608 views • 7 months ago

This woman and her friend just came back from shopping. They get inside the car and get ready to leave when the friend notices their wipers on the car are pulled away from the windshield. The woman panics and starts to drive off, she doesn’t feel safe sitting in that same spot now. She also notices that her mirrors are pushed in. She’s driving around the lot now looking for a spot to put her wipers down and pull her mirrors back out. Is she overreacting at this point or is it possible she’s right and they were waiting for her to get out of her car to fix the wipers?

This woman and her friend just came back from shopping. They get inside the car and get ready to leave when the friend notices their wipers on the car are pulled away from the windshield. The woman panics and starts to drive off, she doesn’t feel safe sitting in that same spot now. She also notices that her mirrors are pushed in. She’s driving around the lot now looking for a spot to put her wipers down and pull her mirrors back out. Is she overreacting at this point or is it possible she’s right and they were waiting for her to get out of her car to fix the wipers?

SonnyBoy🇺🇸

2,034,409 views • 4 months ago

A woman was shopping at her local store when she saw a display of recently discounted designer purses. The deals were good but the selection was Millie’s, she was able to get one that she really liked, she was lucky because they only had one in stock. When she left her cart unattended briefly, a young couple took that purse out of her cart. She saw them again at the check out and they clearly acknowledged what they did. They refused to give it back to her and even gloated in her face. Is there anything she can really do at this point, the people didn’t steal technically since the item wasn’t purchased yet?

A woman was shopping at her local store when she saw a display of recently discounted designer purses. The deals were good but the selection was Millie’s, she was able to get one that she really liked, she was lucky because they only had one in stock. When she left her cart unattended briefly, a young couple took that purse out of her cart. She saw them again at the check out and they clearly acknowledged what they did. They refused to give it back to her and even gloated in her face. Is there anything she can really do at this point, the people didn’t steal technically since the item wasn’t purchased yet?

SonnyBoy🇺🇸

1,058,374 views • 5 months ago

$Robert Alessi is going to absolutely dismantle Jud Welcher tomorrow. Jud actually thought that suggesting the laceration on John’s eyelid was caused by the spoiler, or “wing”, on the back of Karen Read’s SUV, was a good idea. He also seems to be suggesting that the half centimeter abrasion on John’s right lateral knee corresponded to the scuff marks on the rear bumper. In order for either, or both, of these things to be true, this would require John O’Keefe to have been hit—not sideswiped or “clipped”—by the back of Karen’s vehicle. He would’ve had fractures and bruising up and down his body. There were none below the head. He would’ve had bumper marks on his legs. There were none. He also would’ve likely been mowed down and completely run over by her vehicle. He was not. #KarenRead #JudWelcher #FreeKarenRead #KarenReadTrial #KarenReadTrial2 #KarenReadRetrial #JusticeForJohnOKeefe$

Robert Alessi is going to absolutely dismantle Jud Welcher tomorrow. Jud actually thought that suggesting the laceration on John’s eyelid was caused by the spoiler, or “wing”, on the back of Karen Read’s SUV, was a good idea. He also seems to be suggesting that the half centimeter abrasion on John’s right lateral knee corresponded to the scuff marks on the rear bumper. In order for either, or both, of these things to be true, this would require John O’Keefe to have been hit—not sideswiped or “clipped”—by the back of Karen’s vehicle. He would’ve had fractures and bruising up and down his body. There were none below the head. He would’ve had bumper marks on his legs. There were none. He also would’ve likely been mowed down and completely run over by her vehicle. He was not. #KarenRead #JudWelcher #FreeKarenRead #KarenReadTrial #KarenReadTrial2 #KarenReadRetrial #JusticeForJohnOKeefe

Olivia

44,537 views • 1 year ago

This woman is hiding in the back of the restaurant, they turned the lights off to the front of the store. A customer was upset that the store was closed and demands to be served even after hours. They are trying to kick in the door. Should she have just served them anyways at this point, how is she going to get out of the restaurant if the police doesn’t get there in time?

This woman is hiding in the back of the restaurant, they turned the lights off to the front of the store. A customer was upset that the store was closed and demands to be served even after hours. They are trying to kick in the door. Should she have just served them anyways at this point, how is she going to get out of the restaurant if the police doesn’t get there in time?

SonnyBoy🇺🇸

40,876 views • 6 months ago

Karen Read Speaks and we can now 100% confirm that the story Alan Jackson and TB pushed about the basement, the bulkhead, and John O’Keefe being dragged from the backyard is officially dead. Instead, we’re supposed to believe John randomly went into the garage—where nobody else was—which, by the way, has no entrance into the house. So rather than walking into the house where people were gathered and the lights were on, he chose to open the door to a dark garage with no access to the house. So is it possible—maybe it is—that nobody is at fault and there was a Demogorgon in the garage? Maybe Vecna made Karen’s car go into reverse at 75% throttle for over 80 feet, reaching up to 24 mph at the exact same time John stopped moving forever. Maybe Vecna broke her taillight, left it at the crime scene, and somehow transported and embedded microscopic pieces into John’s clothing. Because if John was killed in the garage—and not by the Lexus with the documented damage—then the town of Canton has a much bigger problem on its hands. 34 Fairview might very well be the gateway to the underworld.

Karen Read Speaks and we can now 100% confirm that the story Alan Jackson and TB pushed about the basement, the bulkhead, and John O’Keefe being dragged from the backyard is officially dead. Instead, we’re supposed to believe John randomly went into the garage—where nobody else was—which, by the way, has no entrance into the house. So rather than walking into the house where people were gathered and the lights were on, he chose to open the door to a dark garage with no access to the house. So is it possible—maybe it is—that nobody is at fault and there was a Demogorgon in the garage? Maybe Vecna made Karen’s car go into reverse at 75% throttle for over 80 feet, reaching up to 24 mph at the exact same time John stopped moving forever. Maybe Vecna broke her taillight, left it at the crime scene, and somehow transported and embedded microscopic pieces into John’s clothing. Because if John was killed in the garage—and not by the Lexus with the documented damage—then the town of Canton has a much bigger problem on its hands. 34 Fairview might very well be the gateway to the underworld.

Mama Llama

16,122 views • 7 months ago

Why is it that I’m never there when all the fun things happen at the airport. Most of the time I only see entitled passengers or screaming kids. I would be hilariously entertained if I saw a woman ducking and dodging security while wearing running shoes like she’s was in the NFL. This woman was having an argument with the airline, she felt they were being unreasonable, that was the only explanation she gave. So she jumped behind the counter and said what she needed to say only to be met by security and she gave them a run for their money. Imagine being the guard who took a dive trying to catch her, I bet all his coworkers never let that down. Closest thing I ever seen to this was a teenager who “accidentally” picked up the wrong bag on the floor got up and left. The woman who owned it noticed moments later and saw the girl casually walking with the bag. She took off after her, when she finally caught up to her they left all common sense at the door because the woman started screaming at her and calling her a thief while trying to get the attention of security. The teen kept saying it was her bag. It wasn’t until security got there that they realized she did grab the wrong bag and that hers was kicked under the seat. The odd thing is, her bag looked nothing liked the one she took so it was hard to say if it was intentional because she did after all left her own bag with her stuff in it too. What about you, have you ever seen anything happen at the airport? I must take the boring airlines, I always miss out on the fun incidents.

Why is it that I’m never there when all the fun things happen at the airport. Most of the time I only see entitled passengers or screaming kids. I would be hilariously entertained if I saw a woman ducking and dodging security while wearing running shoes like she’s was in the NFL. This woman was having an argument with the airline, she felt they were being unreasonable, that was the only explanation she gave. So she jumped behind the counter and said what she needed to say only to be met by security and she gave them a run for their money. Imagine being the guard who took a dive trying to catch her, I bet all his coworkers never let that down. Closest thing I ever seen to this was a teenager who “accidentally” picked up the wrong bag on the floor got up and left. The woman who owned it noticed moments later and saw the girl casually walking with the bag. She took off after her, when she finally caught up to her they left all common sense at the door because the woman started screaming at her and calling her a thief while trying to get the attention of security. The teen kept saying it was her bag. It wasn’t until security got there that they realized she did grab the wrong bag and that hers was kicked under the seat. The odd thing is, her bag looked nothing liked the one she took so it was hard to say if it was intentional because she did after all left her own bag with her stuff in it too. What about you, have you ever seen anything happen at the airport? I must take the boring airlines, I always miss out on the fun incidents.

SonnyBoy🇺🇸

3,286,431 views • 1 month ago

A woman and her friend were visiting NYC to do some sight seeing and enjoy the local cuisine, they checked into the hotel for the weekend. They were gone all afternoon, and they came back around 5:00 pm. When she got back she found a notice saying they were being charged $500 for a smoking fee. She immediately went downstairs spoke to a manager. He showed her a report that claimed someone was smoking at 4:30pm which was possible because they weren’t even there and have proof. He told her that there was nothing he could do and that she needs to just dispute it with the bank. Since he refused to heck the cameras or card key logs to prove they weren’t there, is it possible that they the hotel is scamming her and her friend?

A woman and her friend were visiting NYC to do some sight seeing and enjoy the local cuisine, they checked into the hotel for the weekend. They were gone all afternoon, and they came back around 5:00 pm. When she got back she found a notice saying they were being charged $500 for a smoking fee. She immediately went downstairs spoke to a manager. He showed her a report that claimed someone was smoking at 4:30pm which was possible because they weren’t even there and have proof. He told her that there was nothing he could do and that she needs to just dispute it with the bank. Since he refused to heck the cameras or card key logs to prove they weren’t there, is it possible that they the hotel is scamming her and her friend?

SonnyBoy🇺🇸

1,889,364 views • 4 months ago

This woman was picking up her daughter from school when she happened to look down and see a $100 bill frozen in ice on the concrete. She was determined to retrieve it from the ice, she channeled her inner archaeologist, chiseling away at the ice and meting it with hot water. With some patience she was able to free the money from the ice, like me, were you expecting it to be one of those bible verse pamphlets?

This woman was picking up her daughter from school when she happened to look down and see a $100 bill frozen in ice on the concrete. She was determined to retrieve it from the ice, she channeled her inner archaeologist, chiseling away at the ice and meting it with hot water. With some patience she was able to free the money from the ice, like me, were you expecting it to be one of those bible verse pamphlets?

SonnyBoy🇺🇸

3,385,878 views • 4 months ago

New Video- SERT SEARCH: Hiding The Damage When you look at this case through the lens that the MSP (Tully, Proctor & Yuri) were working an "honest investigation, not covering anything up"- is when you truly see how unexplainable their actions during the investigation were. Looking through that lens, when you think about Yuri, Proctor & Tully NOT providing SERT A photograph of the damaged taillight, there is no explanation for it. -They "KNEW" how much damage there was to the taillight -They KNEW SERT was at the scene LOOKING for the taillight -They KNEW that nobody at the scene knew how much damage was at the time. KNOWING this, for them to not send a picture to Tully of the damage to assist the SERT search makes ZERO sense. They should have WANTED to find as much taillight as possible. The problem is, the taillight they needed to be there, wasn't. yet.

New Video- SERT SEARCH: Hiding The Damage When you look at this case through the lens that the MSP (Tully, Proctor & Yuri) were working an "honest investigation, not covering anything up"- is when you truly see how unexplainable their actions during the investigation were. Looking through that lens, when you think about Yuri, Proctor & Tully NOT providing SERT A photograph of the damaged taillight, there is no explanation for it. -They "KNEW" how much damage there was to the taillight -They KNEW SERT was at the scene LOOKING for the taillight -They KNEW that nobody at the scene knew how much damage was at the time. KNOWING this, for them to not send a picture to Tully of the damage to assist the SERT search makes ZERO sense. They should have WANTED to find as much taillight as possible. The problem is, the taillight they needed to be there, wasn't. yet.

Joe Flipperhead

51,464 views • 1 year ago

This woman was tired of looking at her dingy stairs, the color was all wrong and the paint chips were hiding the beautiful wood she wanted to expose. Over the weekend she decided to strip the paint and get the finis she envisioned. The only problem is that there was so many layers of paint that it was impossible to get it off clean, the process was clumsy and slow. Panicking, she called in the pros that quoted her $8000 to do it. At this point wouldn’t it just be easier to just repaint it again since she doesnt want to pay the $8000?

This woman was tired of looking at her dingy stairs, the color was all wrong and the paint chips were hiding the beautiful wood she wanted to expose. Over the weekend she decided to strip the paint and get the finis she envisioned. The only problem is that there was so many layers of paint that it was impossible to get it off clean, the process was clumsy and slow. Panicking, she called in the pros that quoted her $8000 to do it. At this point wouldn’t it just be easier to just repaint it again since she doesnt want to pay the $8000?

Bigwave 2.0

17,576 views • 4 months ago

This woman was tired of looking at her dingy stairs, the color was all wrong and the paint chips were hiding the beautiful wood she wanted to expose. Over the weekend she decided to strip the paint and get the finis she envisioned. The only problem is that there was so many layers of paint that it was impossible to get it off clean, the process was clumsy and slow. Panicking, she called in the pros that quoted her $8000 to do it. At this point wouldn’t it just be easier to just repaint it again since she doesnt want to pay the $8000?

This woman was tired of looking at her dingy stairs, the color was all wrong and the paint chips were hiding the beautiful wood she wanted to expose. Over the weekend she decided to strip the paint and get the finis she envisioned. The only problem is that there was so many layers of paint that it was impossible to get it off clean, the process was clumsy and slow. Panicking, she called in the pros that quoted her $8000 to do it. At this point wouldn’t it just be easier to just repaint it again since she doesnt want to pay the $8000?

SonnyBoy🇺🇸

724,121 views • 4 months ago