Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Zur Startseite

Now avante.nvim supports editing mode! (equivalent to Cursor's cmd + K)

89,173 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr •via X (Twitter)

9 Kommentare

Profilbild von carl 🐸
carl 🐸vor 1 Jahr

off topic but what do you use for your cursor animations? very slick :0

Profilbild von Lukas Kollarovic
Lukas Kollarovicvor 1 Jahr

@yacineMTB Amazing! Any idea if the "tab" is actually possible? The whole autocomplete thing

Profilbild von yetone
yetonevor 1 Jahr

@yacineMTB Smart Tab (Cursor Flow) is the key feature that avante.nvim will focus on implementing next.

Profilbild von char
charvor 1 Jahr

very cool

Profilbild von 𝕄𝕒𝕔 𝕏𝕖𝕟𝕠𝕟
𝕄𝕒𝕔 𝕏𝕖𝕟𝕠𝕟vor 1 Jahr

I love the location of your Telescope/Fzf

Profilbild von 𝕄𝕒𝕔 𝕏𝕖𝕟𝕠𝕟
𝕄𝕒𝕔 𝕏𝕖𝕟𝕠𝕟vor 1 Jahr

One good feature for future would be to automatically inject diagnostic errors and the whole file to the LLM so it can assist with fixing the diagnostic error. Much like how copilot-chat nvim works currently. It's a very useful feature

Profilbild von 0xSasuke
0xSasukevor 1 Jahr

whats your search plugin / configuration you have there?

Profilbild von Hanchin Hsieh
Hanchin Hsiehvor 1 Jahr

amazing!

Profilbild von Jisena 金基瑟娜 — au/acc
Jisena 金基瑟娜 — au/accvor 1 Jahr

bro that’s impressive 🙌🏿

Ähnliche Videos

DLSS 4.5 performance cost on the RTX 4070 Super, tested in #TheLastOfUs, #ArcRaiders, and #RedDeadRedemption2 at 2160p (4K). This time, I replaced the games default CNN models with native 4K to show how the DLSS Transformer model compares against native TAA / TSR. I also included a comparison between the new presets using Performance mode and Preset K in Quality mode. The Last of Us Part I Performance mode – Native (TAA) → Transformer Preset K: ~59% gain – Preset K → Preset L: ~13% hit – Preset K → Preset M: ~7% hit Quality mode – Native (TAA) → Transformer Preset K: ~35% gain – Preset K → Preset L: ~23% hit – Preset K → Preset M: ~17% hit Preset K Quality mode vs Preset L & M Performance mode – Preset K → Preset L: ~5% gain – Preset K → Preset M: ~13% gain Arc Raiders Performance mode – Native (TSR) → Transformer Preset K: ~80% gain – Preset K → Preset L: ~11% hit – Preset K → Preset M: ~7% hit Quality mode – Native (TSR) → Transformer Preset K: ~47% gain – Preset K → Preset L: ~21% hit – Preset K → Preset M: ~16% hit Preset K Quality mode vs Preset L & M Performance mode – Preset K → Preset L: ~5% gain – Preset K → Preset M: ~13% gain Red Dead Redemption 2 Performance mode – Native (TAA) → Transformer Preset K: ~15% gain – Preset K → Preset L: ~11% hit – Preset K → Preset M: ~4% hit Preset K Quality mode vs Preset L & M Performance mode – Preset K → Preset L: ~0% gain – Preset K → Preset M: ~6% gain At 4K, The performance cost of the new presets is more significant than at 1440p, especially in Quality mode, which to be fair, doesn’t really make much sense to use at this resolution on a mid range GPU even with Preset K. In most cases, Preset L and M offer good image quality at 4K in Performance Mode. But right now, I think the biggest and most noticeable visual issue with these new presets is the oversharpening in some games, like The Last of Us. This problem is even more obvious at this resolution especially with Preset M.

BenchmarKing

31,353 Aufrufe • vor 7 Monaten