Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

There was a problem loading this video. This could be due to a temporary network issue or the video might be unavailable.

🚨 NOW - MICHAEL KNOWLES DROPS TRUTH NUKE: "When a fringe right-winger does something awful, he's castigated, thrown into prison, as he should be. When a fringe LEFT-WINGER commits terrorist attacks, sometimes, he's given UNIVERSITY POSITIONS!" "Which happened with Weather Underground, an organization which blew up part of this... show more

Eric Daugherty

1,164,596 subscribers

973,373 views • 9 months ago •via X (Twitter)

News & Politics Education

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

Michael Gibson studied philosophy at NYU, UChicago, and Oxford. Now, he’s waging war against elite universities. Michael was part of the founding team of the Thiel Fellowship, which funded talented youngsters to drop out. He considers universities to be part of what he calls “the Paper Belt,” a series of centralized bureaucracies whose power relies on printing paper: money by the government, laws passed in DC, newspapers printed in New York, and diplomas given by universities. As an anarchist, Michael believes today’s Paper Belt is just as corrupt as the Catholic Church was when it sold indulgences. As a venture capitalist, Michael sees universities as a source of stagnation and offers an alternative plan for how to engender innovation instead. Timestamps: 2:11 The Dark Truth About Universities 12:22 Why Dropouts Have Been So Successful 23:57 Universities Have Stopped Producing Geniuses 36:24 We Destroy the Desire to Be Extraordinary 50:46 No Degree is Required to Be a Great Thinker 52:49 The Tragedy of Self-Doubt 1:00:05 The Poet-Philosopher 1:10:25 How to Be a Conservative Anarchist

Michael Gibson studied philosophy at NYU, UChicago, and Oxford. Now, he’s waging war against elite universities. Michael was part of the founding team of the Thiel Fellowship, which funded talented youngsters to drop out. He considers universities to be part of what he calls “the Paper Belt,” a series of centralized bureaucracies whose power relies on printing paper: money by the government, laws passed in DC, newspapers printed in New York, and diplomas given by universities. As an anarchist, Michael believes today’s Paper Belt is just as corrupt as the Catholic Church was when it sold indulgences. As a venture capitalist, Michael sees universities as a source of stagnation and offers an alternative plan for how to engender innovation instead. Timestamps: 2:11 The Dark Truth About Universities 12:22 Why Dropouts Have Been So Successful 23:57 Universities Have Stopped Producing Geniuses 36:24 We Destroy the Desire to Be Extraordinary 50:46 No Degree is Required to Be a Great Thinker 52:49 The Tragedy of Self-Doubt 1:00:05 The Poet-Philosopher 1:10:25 How to Be a Conservative Anarchist

Johnathan Bi

39,013 views • 10 months ago

🚨 Full Remarks of President Trump on Elon Musk today: "I can't speak more highly about any individual. He's an incredible guy. He's a brilliant guy. He's a wonderful person. I've seen him with his family. I've seen him with a lot of his children. He's got a lot of children. He treats him good. He's He loves His children, but he's a brilliant guy, and he was a tremendous help, both in the campaign and in what he's done with DOGE. And you know what we're talking about, almost $200 million and rising fast, because many of the things that we were looking at are now being found out to be fact. It's terrible. I mean, the fraud, the waste, the abuse, the everything that's happened is just terrible. So I also know that he was treated very unfairly by the I guess he called the public, by some of the public, not by all of it. He makes an incredible car makes everything he does is good, but they took it out on Tesla, and I just thought it was so unfair, because he's trying to help the country, but he has helped the country. I also want him to make sure that he's going to be in great shape, and I know he is. I mean, he's going to be, he's going to do great he loves the country. He didn't need to do this. He did it, and I told him, I said, you know, whenever you're ready, I'd like to keep him for a long time, but whenever you're ready, he's an exceptional that when you see those rockets go up and come back and land in the same gantry, nobody else can do that, but this man. So he's just an incredible person, and he's a friend of mine, and he's a nice person too. He's a very nice person. He really helped the country. Saved us a lot of money. And I heard him say that he'll start easing which is always, he was always, at this time, going to ease out. And when he goes back to Tesla that will be taken care of, it was just, it's artificial. These were sick people that thought they were doing something. He really, he's a great patriot, and he should, really, it should be, it shouldn't be the way that should never have happened to him. And I will tell you right now, he makes a great product. He makes a great product. It's a great car. It's great everything. Starlink is great. What he does is good. He's doing medical things that are amazing. And we have to, at some point, let him go and do that."

🚨 Full Remarks of President Trump on Elon Musk today: "I can't speak more highly about any individual. He's an incredible guy. He's a brilliant guy. He's a wonderful person. I've seen him with his family. I've seen him with a lot of his children. He's got a lot of children. He treats him good. He's He loves His children, but he's a brilliant guy, and he was a tremendous help, both in the campaign and in what he's done with DOGE. And you know what we're talking about, almost $200 million and rising fast, because many of the things that we were looking at are now being found out to be fact. It's terrible. I mean, the fraud, the waste, the abuse, the everything that's happened is just terrible. So I also know that he was treated very unfairly by the I guess he called the public, by some of the public, not by all of it. He makes an incredible car makes everything he does is good, but they took it out on Tesla, and I just thought it was so unfair, because he's trying to help the country, but he has helped the country. I also want him to make sure that he's going to be in great shape, and I know he is. I mean, he's going to be, he's going to do great he loves the country. He didn't need to do this. He did it, and I told him, I said, you know, whenever you're ready, I'd like to keep him for a long time, but whenever you're ready, he's an exceptional that when you see those rockets go up and come back and land in the same gantry, nobody else can do that, but this man. So he's just an incredible person, and he's a friend of mine, and he's a nice person too. He's a very nice person. He really helped the country. Saved us a lot of money. And I heard him say that he'll start easing which is always, he was always, at this time, going to ease out. And when he goes back to Tesla that will be taken care of, it was just, it's artificial. These were sick people that thought they were doing something. He really, he's a great patriot, and he should, really, it should be, it shouldn't be the way that should never have happened to him. And I will tell you right now, he makes a great product. He makes a great product. It's a great car. It's great everything. Starlink is great. What he does is good. He's doing medical things that are amazing. And we have to, at some point, let him go and do that."

DogeDesigner

1,128,568 views • 1 year ago

Who is the Propagandist? Tucker visits our gReATEsT aLLy and explains how he and his team were detained and questioned. He gets smeared, like clockwork. They say he's lying. He's this and he's that. Security footage gets released showing him taking a photo with somebody and they accuse Tucker Carlson of lying by saying look how happy he is, he's taking a photo! Now, Tucker explains the photo and what happened and you have to be the judge. Which story makes more sense? Can you possibly separate from your deep seeded bias to judge this situation fairly? When you do, which story seems more likely? Which makes more sense. So whom is the propagandist? WHOM? WHOMST? What a surprise.

Who is the Propagandist? Tucker visits our gReATEsT aLLy and explains how he and his team were detained and questioned. He gets smeared, like clockwork. They say he's lying. He's this and he's that. Security footage gets released showing him taking a photo with somebody and they accuse Tucker Carlson of lying by saying look how happy he is, he's taking a photo! Now, Tucker explains the photo and what happened and you have to be the judge. Which story makes more sense? Can you possibly separate from your deep seeded bias to judge this situation fairly? When you do, which story seems more likely? Which makes more sense. So whom is the propagandist? WHOM? WHOMST? What a surprise.

Bobby Sauce

25,436 views • 6 months ago

How you do anything is how you do everything. What Steve Stoute learned when Kobe Bryant lived with him: “Kobe spent a month at my house. I watched his routine. It was phenomenal.” “He had these tapes of Michael Jordan. He’d study Michael Jordan going right, Michael Jordan going left, Michael Jordan guarding people going right, Michael Jordan guarding people going left.” “He completely immersed himself.” “Everything Kobe did, he went all the way.” “I had to go find 10 point guards for him to practice against. He was playing against Allen Iverson and wanted 10 point guards with handles.” “We go to Chelsea Piers. These guys are lined up at half court, 10 of them.” “Kobe's at the foul line, and they start coming one by one. They have to get by him and go to the basket. He's stripping the ball, blocking the ball, and as soon as he gets that one, the next one comes. He does not play offense.” “It was like an assembly line.” “This was after he already shot a thousand shots.” “I was like who am I dealing with? And he was 18 or 19 at the time.”

How you do anything is how you do everything. What Steve Stoute learned when Kobe Bryant lived with him: “Kobe spent a month at my house. I watched his routine. It was phenomenal.” “He had these tapes of Michael Jordan. He’d study Michael Jordan going right, Michael Jordan going left, Michael Jordan guarding people going right, Michael Jordan guarding people going left.” “He completely immersed himself.” “Everything Kobe did, he went all the way.” “I had to go find 10 point guards for him to practice against. He was playing against Allen Iverson and wanted 10 point guards with handles.” “We go to Chelsea Piers. These guys are lined up at half court, 10 of them.” “Kobe's at the foul line, and they start coming one by one. They have to get by him and go to the basket. He's stripping the ball, blocking the ball, and as soon as he gets that one, the next one comes. He does not play offense.” “It was like an assembly line.” “This was after he already shot a thousand shots.” “I was like who am I dealing with? And he was 18 or 19 at the time.”

David Senra

31,043 views • 1 month ago

BBC News, "What happened to the 20 recommendations from the child abuse inquiry that were given to the Conservative government?" Sarah Champion, "Nothing happened" BBC News, "Why is Chris Philp sounding so exasperated when he was part of the last gov?" Sarah Champion, "One can only assume he's in opposition now and is trying to make a political point out of this, which I find distasteful" "We ought to be angry at the victims and survivors who has been let down"

BBC News, "What happened to the 20 recommendations from the child abuse inquiry that were given to the Conservative government?" Sarah Champion, "Nothing happened" BBC News, "Why is Chris Philp sounding so exasperated when he was part of the last gov?" Sarah Champion, "One can only assume he's in opposition now and is trying to make a political point out of this, which I find distasteful" "We ought to be angry at the victims and survivors who has been let down"

Farrukh

222,513 views • 1 year ago

🎙️ Bill Simmons: "LaMelo Ball is a real winner this season." "He's actually had seasons with better 'stats.' This is a classic eye test; you have to watch it. I love the way he's playing... there's real thoughtfulness in how he's playing the point guard position now and how he's not as risky and reckless as he was. He doesn't seem like he's in an AND1 tournament anymore." "There's a wherewithal with what he's doing now and how he understands, they have these two incredible wings... Kon Knueppel has a chance to get 300 made threes, which would be nuts. Brandon Miller, when you watch him, this is like the best version of Paul George in the 2010s. And LaMelo's really good at using them, at using Moussa Diabate... he just knows how to drive the (Hornets) car." 🎙️ Zach Lowe: "Everybody got so disgusted with the 5-6 crazy things he would do every game that they unjustifiably dismissed all the statistical indicators that he was actually good and actually was driving Charlotte's offense at a high level when he was on the floor." Full episode: — —

🎙️ Bill Simmons: "LaMelo Ball is a real winner this season." "He's actually had seasons with better 'stats.' This is a classic eye test; you have to watch it. I love the way he's playing... there's real thoughtfulness in how he's playing the point guard position now and how he's not as risky and reckless as he was. He doesn't seem like he's in an AND1 tournament anymore." "There's a wherewithal with what he's doing now and how he understands, they have these two incredible wings... Kon Knueppel has a chance to get 300 made threes, which would be nuts. Brandon Miller, when you watch him, this is like the best version of Paul George in the 2010s. And LaMelo's really good at using them, at using Moussa Diabate... he just knows how to drive the (Hornets) car." 🎙️ Zach Lowe: "Everybody got so disgusted with the 5-6 crazy things he would do every game that they unjustifiably dismissed all the statistical indicators that he was actually good and actually was driving Charlotte's offense at a high level when he was on the floor." Full episode: — —

r/CharlotteHornets

62,208 views • 4 months ago

🚨 MICHAEL BURRY JUST BET AGAINST THE ENTIRE AI The man who predicted the 2008 crash and walked away with $800 million in profit just opened four new short positions: $CAT: short at $1,060 $TSLA: short at $416 $AMAT: short at $729 $NVDA: $187M short at $198 This is not a hedge, this is a conviction bet. Burry doesn't short for fun He shorts when he sees something everyone else is missing The same way he saw 2008 coming while Wall Street was still celebrating. He's seeing it again right now The question is whether you're on the right side of his trade.

🚨 MICHAEL BURRY JUST BET AGAINST THE ENTIRE AI The man who predicted the 2008 crash and walked away with $800 million in profit just opened four new short positions: $CAT: short at $1,060 $TSLA: short at $416 $AMAT: short at $729 $NVDA: $187M short at $198 This is not a hedge, this is a conviction bet. Burry doesn't short for fun He shorts when he sees something everyone else is missing The same way he saw 2008 coming while Wall Street was still celebrating. He's seeing it again right now The question is whether you're on the right side of his trade.

philarekt

45,955 views • 1 month ago

Sylvester Stallone on how Creed almost didn't happen: By 2006, Stallone thought he was finished with Rocky. He'd just wrapped Rocky Balboa, a film he had to fight to make in the first place. "It's tough when you say, hey, I got this great idea about a 60 year old boxer. It's really...3 this is the worst idea ever. But anyway, it got done." He continues: "I was very satisfied with the results. And that was 2006. And I thought, okay, this is my crowning accomplishment." Stallone describes waving goodbye to the audience, certain he was done with the character that had defined his career for three decades. Then eight years later, an unknown filmmaker came knocking with a pitch. "He goes, well, I'm an unknown filmmaker, I haven't made any movies yet. But I have this idea about bringing you back and this character, Apollo Creed. See, Apollo, you didn't know this, had an illegitimate son. So he's telling me the story and I go, very interesting." Stallone passed. The filmmaker (Ryan Coogler) went away and made Fruitvale Station with Michael B. Jordan, which swept awards at Cannes. Then he came back and pitched Stallone again. "He doesn't quit, does he? He's really a pesky guy, you know?" What eventually won Stallone over wasn't just Coogler's persistence: "In this movie, Rocky goes into a different kind of fight. He's not in the ring anymore. And he's dealing with life issues, which is much more realistic in some situations. And Michael, who plays Adonis, comes into his life, and they're from absolute opposite sides of the world, and slowly they begin to meld in kind of a family relationship." The result was a film Stallone's own daughters (who had spent years rolling their eyes at Rambo) finally approved of. "They went, finally, you've made a decent film."

Sylvester Stallone on how Creed almost didn't happen: By 2006, Stallone thought he was finished with Rocky. He'd just wrapped Rocky Balboa, a film he had to fight to make in the first place. "It's tough when you say, hey, I got this great idea about a 60 year old boxer. It's really...3 this is the worst idea ever. But anyway, it got done." He continues: "I was very satisfied with the results. And that was 2006. And I thought, okay, this is my crowning accomplishment." Stallone describes waving goodbye to the audience, certain he was done with the character that had defined his career for three decades. Then eight years later, an unknown filmmaker came knocking with a pitch. "He goes, well, I'm an unknown filmmaker, I haven't made any movies yet. But I have this idea about bringing you back and this character, Apollo Creed. See, Apollo, you didn't know this, had an illegitimate son. So he's telling me the story and I go, very interesting." Stallone passed. The filmmaker (Ryan Coogler) went away and made Fruitvale Station with Michael B. Jordan, which swept awards at Cannes. Then he came back and pitched Stallone again. "He doesn't quit, does he? He's really a pesky guy, you know?" What eventually won Stallone over wasn't just Coogler's persistence: "In this movie, Rocky goes into a different kind of fight. He's not in the ring anymore. And he's dealing with life issues, which is much more realistic in some situations. And Michael, who plays Adonis, comes into his life, and they're from absolute opposite sides of the world, and slowly they begin to meld in kind of a family relationship." The result was a film Stallone's own daughters (who had spent years rolling their eyes at Rambo) finally approved of. "They went, finally, you've made a decent film."

History Nerd

12,922 views • 1 month ago

"To be attacked for simply asking to see the evidence was beyond the pale. I personally thought it was atrocious." Jack Posobiec was in the courtroom when Defense Attorney Michael Burt lashed out at Erika Kirk. He tells me what he saw: “When Erika heard her name mentioned that way from the Defense team, let me just say that her head shot up and she focused directly on the individual, Attorney Michael Burt, and what he was saying, as did mine. What the family was asking for in that moment was to be shown the zoomed-in image—not to be broadcast to the world. They said, 'could we at least see the zoomed-in image,' which the judge had blocked earlier in the week, of the individual they believe is Tyler Robinson when he's crouched down in the prone position. He's already assembled the rifle, and now he's crawling across the building towards the sniper's perch right on the edge of the building, which has a direct line of sight to where Charlie's tent was. And the judge had ruled that 'we can show the video, but we can't zoom in on this spot.' They just want to be able to see the evidence, to see what happened to Charlie, to have some kind of, you know, I'm not going to say there's ever going to be closure or satisfaction, but at least some kind of understanding of what went on here.”

"To be attacked for simply asking to see the evidence was beyond the pale. I personally thought it was atrocious." Jack Posobiec was in the courtroom when Defense Attorney Michael Burt lashed out at Erika Kirk. He tells me what he saw: “When Erika heard her name mentioned that way from the Defense team, let me just say that her head shot up and she focused directly on the individual, Attorney Michael Burt, and what he was saying, as did mine. What the family was asking for in that moment was to be shown the zoomed-in image—not to be broadcast to the world. They said, 'could we at least see the zoomed-in image,' which the judge had blocked earlier in the week, of the individual they believe is Tyler Robinson when he's crouched down in the prone position. He's already assembled the rifle, and now he's crawling across the building towards the sniper's perch right on the edge of the building, which has a direct line of sight to where Charlie's tent was. And the judge had ruled that 'we can show the video, but we can't zoom in on this spot.' They just want to be able to see the evidence, to see what happened to Charlie, to have some kind of, you know, I'm not going to say there's ever going to be closure or satisfaction, but at least some kind of understanding of what went on here.”

Glenn Beck

207,041 views • 1 month ago

🚨After their UFO encounters they were supposedly given an “Anthrax booster”... 1. Michael Herrera: Claims he encountered a large UFO with rogue operators and later describes being given an “anthrax booster” as part of the aftermath. 2. Jonathan Weygandt: In his 1997 Peru crash retrieval account, he describes being taken over by unmarked personnel, restrained, warned into silence and given an "anthrax booster". 3. Roderick Castle: During a 1997 military exercise, he was sent to investigate some flare activity, saw a 300ft triangle with a “black team,” got held at gunpoint and then was told to take an “anthrax booster” immediately after. Why would UFO related incidents be followed by a mandatory injection labeled “anthrax”?

🚨After their UFO encounters they were supposedly given an “Anthrax booster”... 1. Michael Herrera: Claims he encountered a large UFO with rogue operators and later describes being given an “anthrax booster” as part of the aftermath. 2. Jonathan Weygandt: In his 1997 Peru crash retrieval account, he describes being taken over by unmarked personnel, restrained, warned into silence and given an "anthrax booster". 3. Roderick Castle: During a 1997 military exercise, he was sent to investigate some flare activity, saw a 300ft triangle with a “black team,” got held at gunpoint and then was told to take an “anthrax booster” immediately after. Why would UFO related incidents be followed by a mandatory injection labeled “anthrax”?

American Alchemy

30,010 views • 7 months ago

If Charlie had a neck of actual steel it still would have had exit wound. Andrew Wilson will claim that this green beret is not an expert and refute it with a 90 year old study published by the government accused of lying. The study he will reference will not have any examples of a human neck. As he does this he will attack the character of Nate and make an accusation of his motives. He will then try to redefine a word. He will then do something infuriating in an attempt to get an emotional reaction where he can claim he’s being attacked. But mark my words, he will find a way out of it. It will probably be Michael Knowles. There is no way Michael’s owner Ben Shapiro will allow Michael to take part in the public slaughter of the case against Tyler Robinson. They will then delay as they try to find another moderator. They will propose Bari Weiss or victor marx. When Candace refuses they will blame Candace. At this point Candace may accept Bari Weiss. If this happens they may just detonate the pager they gave Andrew Wilson that says “debate king” on it. They can’t allow this to happen and they will try to manipulate the optics to save face. It will be absolutely rediculous.

If Charlie had a neck of actual steel it still would have had exit wound. Andrew Wilson will claim that this green beret is not an expert and refute it with a 90 year old study published by the government accused of lying. The study he will reference will not have any examples of a human neck. As he does this he will attack the character of Nate and make an accusation of his motives. He will then try to redefine a word. He will then do something infuriating in an attempt to get an emotional reaction where he can claim he’s being attacked. But mark my words, he will find a way out of it. It will probably be Michael Knowles. There is no way Michael’s owner Ben Shapiro will allow Michael to take part in the public slaughter of the case against Tyler Robinson. They will then delay as they try to find another moderator. They will propose Bari Weiss or victor marx. When Candace refuses they will blame Candace. At this point Candace may accept Bari Weiss. If this happens they may just detonate the pager they gave Andrew Wilson that says “debate king” on it. They can’t allow this to happen and they will try to manipulate the optics to save face. It will be absolutely rediculous.

Owen Benjamin 🐻

32,879 views • 10 days ago

Is Saylor selling Bitcoin low only to buy it back higher with STRC? "Clearly selling Bitcoin is not a problem, and the fact that he's not buying is seemingly not a problem for the market either. But the thing I'm wondering now, and this remains open ended, is now that he's selling Bitcoin to buy STRC, what happens when STRC inevitably gets back to a hundred bucks and the old machine of using STRC to buy Bitcoin kicks back into motion?" "Are they actually going to be selling STRC to buy Bitcoin back at a higher price? Are we selling the lows on Bitcoin after buying the highs, only to buy that Bitcoin back higher with the very same instrument he's buying back? I'd say Michael Saylor here is in a bit of a pickle" "Having this not be the main narrative for crypto at the moment is really good news. Michael Saylor spent years turning dollars into Bitcoin. Now he's discovered there's a reverse button, and I don't love it"

Is Saylor selling Bitcoin low only to buy it back higher with STRC? "Clearly selling Bitcoin is not a problem, and the fact that he's not buying is seemingly not a problem for the market either. But the thing I'm wondering now, and this remains open ended, is now that he's selling Bitcoin to buy STRC, what happens when STRC inevitably gets back to a hundred bucks and the old machine of using STRC to buy Bitcoin kicks back into motion?" "Are they actually going to be selling STRC to buy Bitcoin back at a higher price? Are we selling the lows on Bitcoin after buying the highs, only to buy that Bitcoin back higher with the very same instrument he's buying back? I'd say Michael Saylor here is in a bit of a pickle" "Having this not be the main narrative for crypto at the moment is really good news. Michael Saylor spent years turning dollars into Bitcoin. Now he's discovered there's a reverse button, and I don't love it"

The Wolf Of All Streets

36,187 views • 9 days ago

Easy says Ansem is creating a flywheel where people get rewarded for building around $ANSEM "I think Ansem is genuinely doing the best job by far with bullposting his own coin. He's giving out rewards constantly" "He's just giving a bunch of dope stuff. So it's like, if you go and make something if you go and make something, you ultimately get rewarded" "What’s fascinating to me is basically you’re in a market where if you go and make something around the current topic, you’re going to get rewarded" "What that does is it's creating this flywheel, this virality loop of people that want to be involved, and it's true, quote, community building, because now you're going to get airdropped and you want to see price appreciate, you want to see price continue to grind up, which I think is an absolute home run"

Easy says Ansem is creating a flywheel where people get rewarded for building around $ANSEM "I think Ansem is genuinely doing the best job by far with bullposting his own coin. He's giving out rewards constantly" "He's just giving a bunch of dope stuff. So it's like, if you go and make something if you go and make something, you ultimately get rewarded" "What’s fascinating to me is basically you’re in a market where if you go and make something around the current topic, you’re going to get rewarded" "What that does is it's creating this flywheel, this virality loop of people that want to be involved, and it's true, quote, community building, because now you're going to get airdropped and you want to see price appreciate, you want to see price continue to grind up, which I think is an absolute home run"

Shadooow

67,355 views • 1 month ago

🚨 BOOM! SCOTT JENNINGS DROPS TRUTH BOMB: "I don't think it's very America first to let a narco-terrorist state with an illegitimate government that's aligned with China and Russia and Iran do things in our hemisphere that we don't like with drugs!" 🔥 "The President's position has always been this is the Western Hemisphere. We're going to police it." "We don't even recognize these guys as a legitimate government. He is trying to he's trying to bring about a situation where the worst people in the hemisphere are not enriching themselves, not distributing drugs!" "And if we wind up with a legitimately elected government there that's aligned with the United States instead of Russia, China and Iran, that's America first." Scott Jennings Perfectly said 💯💯

🚨 BOOM! SCOTT JENNINGS DROPS TRUTH BOMB: "I don't think it's very America first to let a narco-terrorist state with an illegitimate government that's aligned with China and Russia and Iran do things in our hemisphere that we don't like with drugs!" 🔥 "The President's position has always been this is the Western Hemisphere. We're going to police it." "We don't even recognize these guys as a legitimate government. He is trying to he's trying to bring about a situation where the worst people in the hemisphere are not enriching themselves, not distributing drugs!" "And if we wind up with a legitimately elected government there that's aligned with the United States instead of Russia, China and Iran, that's America first." Scott Jennings Perfectly said 💯💯

Eric Daugherty

142,649 views • 8 months ago

We have to get this infrastructure act passed because without it tokenization will never be adopted by institutional index. Neither will Bitcoin, which is still a fringe asset to the big guys. It has to become compliant globally within the SEC with an actual passage of a bill. When that occurs, it's gonna change everything. It hasn't happened yet and the midterms are coming in November. The chance to pass this bill is now even though there's huge debate about interest or yield or awards on stable coins which were passed on Genius. Look what happened to stable coins. Almost immediately they got adopted globally. Almost immediately. That's what happens when the bill passes, so we need that to occur.

We have to get this infrastructure act passed because without it tokenization will never be adopted by institutional index. Neither will Bitcoin, which is still a fringe asset to the big guys. It has to become compliant globally within the SEC with an actual passage of a bill. When that occurs, it's gonna change everything. It hasn't happened yet and the midterms are coming in November. The chance to pass this bill is now even though there's huge debate about interest or yield or awards on stable coins which were passed on Genius. Look what happened to stable coins. Almost immediately they got adopted globally. Almost immediately. That's what happens when the bill passes, so we need that to occur.

Kevin O'Leary aka Mr. Wonderful

53,055 views • 3 months ago

Brad Stevens on Jaylen Brown: 🎥: CLNS Media Boston Sports Network “Jaylen Brown is a big part of us. I’m never going to predict the future. everything that I think about over the past few years has been building around those guys, right?…But at the same time, the one thing | want to make very clear is how valued he's always been. He's been amazing. He's been an amazing teammate, a great person to be around…whether that run ends 10 years from now when he retires, or before, there's a lot to celebrate… I don't want to predict the future. I look at it as, this is our team."

Brad Stevens on Jaylen Brown: 🎥: CLNS Media Boston Sports Network “Jaylen Brown is a big part of us. I’m never going to predict the future. everything that I think about over the past few years has been building around those guys, right?…But at the same time, the one thing | want to make very clear is how valued he's always been. He's been amazing. He's been an amazing teammate, a great person to be around…whether that run ends 10 years from now when he retires, or before, there's a lot to celebrate… I don't want to predict the future. I look at it as, this is our team."

Savage

97,067 views • 1 month ago

🔴🎙️Gary Neville: With midfield targets almost done, Manchester United should sign one of Ole’s scouted attackers 🗣️ Ole always had an incredible eye for talent, but the board missed out on so many players he recommended. If they had actually listened to him, his time at Manchester United might have ended very differently. You really can't blame him, especially considering it wasn't right for Ronaldo to return to the EPL and play for a rival club. I’ve been watching two specific kids Ole mentioned: Antonio Nusa and Andreas Schjelderup. I really hope the board looks into them. Either one would fit perfectly into Michael Carrick’s system because we desperately need natural wingers. Matheus Cunha isn't a true winger, neither is Patrick Dorgu, and Rashford isn't getting any younger. Carrick needs to compete next season, and adding a proper, natural winger would make our attack so much smoother. Between Andreas Schjelderup and Antonio Nusa, which winger do you want Manchester United to buy as a Rashford replacement?

🔴🎙️Gary Neville: With midfield targets almost done, Manchester United should sign one of Ole’s scouted attackers 🗣️ Ole always had an incredible eye for talent, but the board missed out on so many players he recommended. If they had actually listened to him, his time at Manchester United might have ended very differently. You really can't blame him, especially considering it wasn't right for Ronaldo to return to the EPL and play for a rival club. I’ve been watching two specific kids Ole mentioned: Antonio Nusa and Andreas Schjelderup. I really hope the board looks into them. Either one would fit perfectly into Michael Carrick’s system because we desperately need natural wingers. Matheus Cunha isn't a true winger, neither is Patrick Dorgu, and Rashford isn't getting any younger. Carrick needs to compete next season, and adding a proper, natural winger would make our attack so much smoother. Between Andreas Schjelderup and Antonio Nusa, which winger do you want Manchester United to buy as a Rashford replacement?

(Fan) United Jnr ❤️

81,723 views • 1 month ago