Nowhere in the Constitution does it say that Marco Rubio can override the First Amendment just because he doesn’t like what you wrote in a student newspaper. Rümeysa Öztürk’s op-ed wasn’t a national security threat, & certainly didn’t warrant her being kidnapped off the street.

You are the most anti constitutional congressperson in the history of our country.

These replies are filled with Israeli bots trying to destroy American civilians liberties.

“We’re about to do more “ … Secretary Rubio Cry more Pramila 😜🤣

I suspect your student visa would have been revoked under Rubio and America would have been better off as a result.

You should read current visa laws and requirements. Then read the Constitution with all its amendments and clauses. Secretary Rubio schooled you. I saw that exchange you had and he embarrassed you in front of the nation. Read if you know how👇

The authority to revoke an approved visa petition is granted under 8 U.S.C. 1155, which allows the Secretary of Homeland Security to revoke a petition at their discretion. This broad statutory language gives USCIS significant latitude in deciding whether a previously approved petition should be rescinded. Unlike initial petition approvals, which require the petitioner to prove eligibility, revocations are based on new information, procedural errors, or changes in circumstances after approval.

You Are Pathetic

Bless your heart, you are as stupid and traitorous as you look.

The Constitution protects free speech, but it also grants Congress authority over immigration. The real scandal? Taxpayer dollars funding a six-week detention over a campus op-ed while real threats go unchecked. The State Department’s visa revocation process under Rubio wasted resources on a political stunt instead of securing borders or auditing programs like USAID’s $60B annual budget. If D.C. wants to prioritize national security, start by defunding bureaucratic overreach that targets students and redirect those millions to vetting high-risk entries or dismantling cartel operations. This isn’t about free speech—it’s about a broken system that burns cash on performative enforcement while ignoring systemic rot.