Nuccetelli, at the UFO hearing: "There is no evidence."

Holy crap Dude. You know he was mid sentence, right? It’s stuff like this that really damages your credibility as a skeptic.

All he could think of was the video just shown.

All you could think of is highlighting a comment that was mid sentence & out of context. He also “thought of” relaying his own experience as evidence - but maybe he was qualifying an interpretation of what might be regarded as evidence.

@MickWest There is no proofs of aliens.....

@MickWest There is no proof of how gravity works. There is no proof that localizes conciousness in the brain. There is no proof regarding of how quantum physics reconciles with classical physics.

@TamboriniFabio @MickWest No proof of how gravity works??? Have you heard of Issac Newton?

@TamboriniFabio @MickWest Yeah Dude. I have. You obviously know very little about the subject. We can describe it classically but we do not understand how gravity does what it does - how it distorts the fabric of space, & how its classical mechanics reconcile with the quantum realm.

If you were about accuracy and truth you’d probably consider deleting this mid-sentence clip and re-post the full exchange?

I posted the entire question, answer, follow-up question, and answer to that.

You’ve posted 35 seconds and misquoted. The context of this exchange is very different from how your clip and quote is framed. Jeff talks about multiple corroborating witness evidence, both military and Boeing. Documentation evidence, some of which still in his possession, others in possession of AARO and the FBI. Jeff himself is giving 𝘦𝘷𝘪𝘥𝘦𝘯𝘤𝘦 under Oath.

@MickWest Mick doesn't give any additional weight to testimony under Oath.

@UAPFilesPodcast @MickWest Why anyone gives this guy oxygen is beyond me. The entire community should simply block his bad faith troll-for-hire ass. Just like the Guerilla Skeptics delete people from Wikipedia, delete him from the conversation. Let him preach to the debunker choir. #BlockMickWest

Because he’s influencing if unchecked. We didn’t engage with the Wikipedia editors when they were editing and that hasn’t stopped them. If anything (UFO) Wikipedia has been totally reframed because we didn’t pay attention, or take part. He doesn’t care about what we think, but he does care about others watching (including AI/GPT etc.,) they’re watching and learning. I wrote about it in more detail here:

I disagree. Mick has been wrong many times. Suggesting he has a 99% accuracy rate is odd. We’ve re-debunked a few of his debunks. I’d say he’s more 50% accuracy rate. Which is a coin toss. The problem with Mick being the authority on UAP is that he’s being used to cite/fact check. He is not an optical physicist, aerospace expert, photography expert or weapons analyst etc. He is a computer game programmer with a very small amount of pilot experience conducting experiments over his back yard swimming pool. I talk to physicists, PhD level experts and analysts, commercial pilots and scientists all the time. Many disagree with his conclusions. I agree it’s important to sort the wheat from the chaff, but it needs to be done with confidence. With actual experts. I’ve debunked 2 of his analysis (Kumburgaz & Denbigh Lights). In fact, his own forum moderators have said they’ve debunked his analysis on the Denbigh Lights case (his Metabunk moderator Flarkey). If we’re going to get to the bottom of these cases with any confidence we need actual subject matter experts being used as the authority on conclusions and resolutions. Would you be happy with Jimmy from the UAP Files Podcast being used as a fact check authority debunking airforce videos and that being cited on Community Notes and Wikipedia as an authority? My guess is probably not. But you’re ok with Mick? Why is that? And I’m not even slightly worked up. Cool as a cucumber. It’s important to be able to disagree with respect and politeness. I just have a different opinion that I’m happy to stand behind.

LMAO Micks your parallax balloon seagull hypothesis won’t fit the video released today! What will you do? What will you ever do now?

You're such a disingenuous bitch

You are so disingenuous it’s embarrassing.

Your scam of being agnostic for the sake of being agnostic is over Mick. Unless you find some seagulls that have learned to dodge hellfire missiles, CONFIRMED on DoD devices.

Your a proper cunt mick. Genuinely.

The whole hearing was evidence from start to finish

It isn't saying a lot about these witnesses testimony when they say they believed in UFO's before they had an "experience"

The whole point of the Congressional UAP Transparency Hearing is to demand that “evidence”, currently being withheld by The Pentagon and its contractors, be made public.

Haha I heard this and 100% knew that Mick would selectively clip this one half sentence. Totally disingenuous man and very poor reporting. You have to do better Mick, this is why people think you work for the IC.

Wait. I thought you just analyze videos?

Nuccetelli ?? Sounds like a Italian copy of nutella and he sounds a little nutty 🤣

Don't let anyone call Mick West a cherry picker. Sure, he might have plucked a few words out of an incomplete sentence during a 2.5-hour hearing, but still…

Knew this was coming lmaooo Now let’s hear your thoughts on the hellfire video 🍿🍿🍿

Let’s parse every word to find a few that fight with my narrative. In no way, shape and/or form does this fit with the overarching narrative of the hearing and shame on you for that completely dishonest spin. You know better.

Yeah, the new video is compelling. Better to quote witnesses out of context than address that.

No evidence... 🤷‍♂️

One second later he said there is really great evidence.

This is just advertising stories without evidence to help with book deals. Nobody has any urgency or concerns about the military shooting at UAPs and no protocol to avoid possible retaliation from an advanced civilization that has technology to destroy human race without notice

no proofs

The entire UFO topic summed up in 10 seconds

There is evidence. Just not proof. Not yet.

Can't wait for your attempt to debunk the video. Lemme guess, it was a weather balloon

Yeah, your Nick name of “thick mick” I can see why that’s a thing.

Im really not being an ahole here but i knew you would say it was a balloon. Even though this probably is a balloon this time. which is incredibly ironic. I just think you do go the balloon route quite a bit mate tbh.

Do you really believe that the military just sends drones and hellfire missiles out just Willy Nilly without tracking their targets on multiple sensors and radar/sonar (if it goes underwater). All of that is evidence, it’s just not made public due to national security risks.

“I would say this video today is exceptional evidence”.

what are those videos and testimonies then?

Plasma is real Mick just do better research, UFO NHI whatever you want to call it this days are just a distraction from the real stuff…

Not even DTL's?

What’s your analysis of the new footage Mick?

Mick, this clip is not evidence of no evidence but it may illustrate a centrality of the debunk at all costs approach- to decontextualize and otherwise obscure the data. He was cut off, and was likely to urge an aggregated approach to the evidence rather than a focus on one case.

there is so much evidence - the only question is to whether it constitutes proof!