Sensitive content

This media may contain sensitive content.

Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

Go Home

Nutting between these ass cheeks 🙈🤤🍑 (with my “cum action” dildo” Who remembers this throw back? subscribe to see more #nsfw #sexy #bbw #bbc #Subscribe #Onlyfans #onlyfansmodel #baddie #creampie #dmvsfreaks #badgirl #DMVArea #ebonypyt #ebony #ebonygoddess #OFmodel #Livestream #petite

Cocoakatana's profile picture

Cocoa Katana

54,961 subscribers

22,792 views • 6 months ago •via X (Twitter)

NSFW#nsfw#sexy#bbw#bbc#Subscribe#Onlyfans#onlyfansmodel#baddie#creampie#dmvsfreaks#badgirl#DMVArea#ebonypyt#ebony
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

There is a growing unease across Britain - one that dares not speak its name. For years, the public was told to look away, to avoid uncomfortable truths for fear of being labelled racist or xenophobic. But the evidence is mounting, and the patterns are too stark to ignore. From the cover-up of industrial-scale rape gangs to the rise of sectarian bloc voting, a dangerous new force has taken root in our institutions. It is not just about race or religion, it is about power, loyalty, and control. At the heart of it lies a deeply entrenched system imported from Pakistan: the clan. These clans, operating more like organised crime families than traditional immigrant communities, have quietly embedded themselves into the fabric of British politics and public life. And yet, few dare to speak of it. Until now. We are right to describe these networks as Pakistani Rape Clans, not simply Pakistani Rape Gangs. The term “clan” better reflects the structure, loyalty, and operational dynamics at play. As Professor Alexis Jay observed during her investigation into the Rotherham scandal, these clans often trace their roots to a specific region of Pakistan. This distinction matters, and it should shape how we think about these crimes and the systems that allow them to flourish. We need to move beyond the vague and misleading label of “Asian grooming gangs.” Precision matters, and with it comes a clearer understanding of how these clans operate - and why they evade scrutiny. 1. Clan Structures and the Limits of Western Oversight In Pakistani communities, the clan (or baradari) structure creates a web of loyalty that transcends the nuclear family model most Western institutions are built to monitor. In the UK, declarations of interest, meant to prevent conflicts of interest among politicians and public servants, typically require disclosure of ties only to close family members, such as spouses or children. But in these Pakistani clans, the network extends far beyond. First cousin marriages are common and reinforce familial bonds, while informal financial systems like “committee” (a parallel banking and loan scheme) bind families together economically. These networks create an almost impenetrable wall of loyalty and dependency. The result? These clans can operate much like mafia families. Within a single clan, you may find elected officials, police officers, civil servants, and members of organised crime - all working in a web of protection and mutual interest. Our traditional safeguards, rooted in Western definitions of family, simply aren’t equipped to detect these relationships. 2. Electoral Corruption and Clan-Controlled Power This clan dominance doesn't stop at cultural or economic networks, it extends deep into British democracy itself. Postal vote fraud and Muslim bloc voting have become powerful tools for entrenching sectarian, clan-affiliated politicians in office. In many towns, entire neighbourhoods vote not as individuals, but as a single bloc - under instructions from community leaders or mosque elders who act on behalf of the clan’s interests. Postal votes, often harvested or filled in under coercion, ensure that dissenting voices, especially women or younger voters, are silenced before they even reach the ballot box. This isn’t democracy. It’s feudalism by post, where elections become little more than coronation ceremonies for candidates who owe their loyalty not to constituents or country, but to the clan. These same politicians then sit in Parliament or local councils, not just as representatives of political parties, but as nodes in a wider network - often untouchable, protected by cultural taboos, political correctness, and accusations of racism. 3. The Implications: What Are We Missing? This raises a crucial question: Which clans do certain public figures belong to? Once we apply a clan-based lens to political activity, the picture begins to sharpen. Take Tahir Ali MP. He has previously used his parliamentary platform to advocate for blasphemy laws - echoing the values of hardline Pakistani clerics, not British liberal democracy. He has also pushed for an airport in Mirpur, a bizarre priority unless you understand the pull of clan ties and dual allegiances between the UK and a single region in Pakistan. Then there’s Shabana Mahmood MP, who this week intervened to defend the censorship of rape gang trial transcripts, objecting to public access that could expose cultural or religious motivations behind the crimes. Instead of siding with transparency and justice, the Justice Secretary sided with concealment. And @AfzalKhanMCR? Despite his position as an MP for Manchester Gorton and former Mayor of the great city, he has remained conspicuously silent on Operation Augusta - a police investigation into hundreds, if not thousands, of child sexual exploitation victims in Greater Manchester. His silence speaks volumes, especially when the victims were largely white working-class girls and the perpetrators predominantly from Pakistani backgrounds. There are a long list of politicians, operating at local and national levels, who I could continue to name and critique. Once we start viewing British politics through this lens, where clan loyalty supersedes democratic duty, we begin to uncover a buried infrastructure of influence that spans from small towns in the UK to rural regions of Pakistan. Now are you starting to see why Labour politicians have repeatedly tried to imprison me? Why Pakistani sectarians and Islamists, shielded by Andy Burnham's now-discredited, rape gang-protecting Greater Manchester Police, have openly called for my murder? Because the moment we start asking the right questions - about clan loyalty, about democratic subversion, about institutionalised corruption - the entire facade begins to crack. This isn't just a scandal. It's a system. It’s why whistleblowers are punished, not praised. Why the media stays silent. Why justice is denied to the most vulnerable among us - white working-class girls, betrayed and forgotten. And why politicians with ties to these networks rise to power unchallenged, untouchable. But we are no longer afraid to speak. The cost of silence has become greater than the cost of truth. If you’re tired of seeing your country manipulated by those who owe their loyalty to clans, not constituents, if you want to help expose the networks, protect victims, and take back control of your democracy, then now is the time to stand with us. Want to help stop this? Learn how to fight back. Speak up. Organise. Share this. Support me. And never, ever look away again. Raja Miah MBE _________ For those new to me, I'm Raja Miah MBE. I spent six years leading a small team that exposed how Labour politicians protected Pakistani Rape Gangs and exchanged working class White girls for votes. Both politicians and police have all repeatedly tried and failed to have me imprisoned. My crime? Refusing to look the other way to the gang rape of children. My work continues despite powerful forces including the media, politicians, police and public officials all conspiring to desperately stop me and bury the truth. This includes the recent announcement of my role in The Rape Gang Inquiry team led by Rupert Lowe MP. All of my content is shared for free. I publish all the materials on my website Red Wall and the Rabble. Please subscribe. We really need more numbers. 👉 I only ask for a small contribution if you can afford to do so. Please commit to just £3 a month or £30 for the year to help me continue. 👉 Prefer a one-time contribution? 👉 👉 With no corporate backers or political sponsors, I rely solely on the support of ordinary people who understand what's at stake. No one else is going to come to our rescue. It is up to us. Please help me. Raja 🙏
0:54

There is a growing unease across Britain - one that dares not speak its name. For years, the public was told to look away, to avoid uncomfortable truths for fear of being labelled racist or xenophobic. But the evidence is mounting, and the patterns are too stark to ignore. From the cover-up of industrial-scale rape gangs to the rise of sectarian bloc voting, a dangerous new force has taken root in our institutions. It is not just about race or religion, it is about power, loyalty, and control. At the heart of it lies a deeply entrenched system imported from Pakistan: the clan. These clans, operating more like organised crime families than traditional immigrant communities, have quietly embedded themselves into the fabric of British politics and public life. And yet, few dare to speak of it. Until now. We are right to describe these networks as Pakistani Rape Clans, not simply Pakistani Rape Gangs. The term “clan” better reflects the structure, loyalty, and operational dynamics at play. As Professor Alexis Jay observed during her investigation into the Rotherham scandal, these clans often trace their roots to a specific region of Pakistan. This distinction matters, and it should shape how we think about these crimes and the systems that allow them to flourish. We need to move beyond the vague and misleading label of “Asian grooming gangs.” Precision matters, and with it comes a clearer understanding of how these clans operate - and why they evade scrutiny. 1. Clan Structures and the Limits of Western Oversight In Pakistani communities, the clan (or baradari) structure creates a web of loyalty that transcends the nuclear family model most Western institutions are built to monitor. In the UK, declarations of interest, meant to prevent conflicts of interest among politicians and public servants, typically require disclosure of ties only to close family members, such as spouses or children. But in these Pakistani clans, the network extends far beyond. First cousin marriages are common and reinforce familial bonds, while informal financial systems like “committee” (a parallel banking and loan scheme) bind families together economically. These networks create an almost impenetrable wall of loyalty and dependency. The result? These clans can operate much like mafia families. Within a single clan, you may find elected officials, police officers, civil servants, and members of organised crime - all working in a web of protection and mutual interest. Our traditional safeguards, rooted in Western definitions of family, simply aren’t equipped to detect these relationships. 2. Electoral Corruption and Clan-Controlled Power This clan dominance doesn't stop at cultural or economic networks, it extends deep into British democracy itself. Postal vote fraud and Muslim bloc voting have become powerful tools for entrenching sectarian, clan-affiliated politicians in office. In many towns, entire neighbourhoods vote not as individuals, but as a single bloc - under instructions from community leaders or mosque elders who act on behalf of the clan’s interests. Postal votes, often harvested or filled in under coercion, ensure that dissenting voices, especially women or younger voters, are silenced before they even reach the ballot box. This isn’t democracy. It’s feudalism by post, where elections become little more than coronation ceremonies for candidates who owe their loyalty not to constituents or country, but to the clan. These same politicians then sit in Parliament or local councils, not just as representatives of political parties, but as nodes in a wider network - often untouchable, protected by cultural taboos, political correctness, and accusations of racism. 3. The Implications: What Are We Missing? This raises a crucial question: Which clans do certain public figures belong to? Once we apply a clan-based lens to political activity, the picture begins to sharpen. Take Tahir Ali MP. He has previously used his parliamentary platform to advocate for blasphemy laws - echoing the values of hardline Pakistani clerics, not British liberal democracy. He has also pushed for an airport in Mirpur, a bizarre priority unless you understand the pull of clan ties and dual allegiances between the UK and a single region in Pakistan. Then there’s Shabana Mahmood MP, who this week intervened to defend the censorship of rape gang trial transcripts, objecting to public access that could expose cultural or religious motivations behind the crimes. Instead of siding with transparency and justice, the Justice Secretary sided with concealment. And @AfzalKhanMCR? Despite his position as an MP for Manchester Gorton and former Mayor of the great city, he has remained conspicuously silent on Operation Augusta - a police investigation into hundreds, if not thousands, of child sexual exploitation victims in Greater Manchester. His silence speaks volumes, especially when the victims were largely white working-class girls and the perpetrators predominantly from Pakistani backgrounds. There are a long list of politicians, operating at local and national levels, who I could continue to name and critique. Once we start viewing British politics through this lens, where clan loyalty supersedes democratic duty, we begin to uncover a buried infrastructure of influence that spans from small towns in the UK to rural regions of Pakistan. Now are you starting to see why Labour politicians have repeatedly tried to imprison me? Why Pakistani sectarians and Islamists, shielded by Andy Burnham's now-discredited, rape gang-protecting Greater Manchester Police, have openly called for my murder? Because the moment we start asking the right questions - about clan loyalty, about democratic subversion, about institutionalised corruption - the entire facade begins to crack. This isn't just a scandal. It's a system. It’s why whistleblowers are punished, not praised. Why the media stays silent. Why justice is denied to the most vulnerable among us - white working-class girls, betrayed and forgotten. And why politicians with ties to these networks rise to power unchallenged, untouchable. But we are no longer afraid to speak. The cost of silence has become greater than the cost of truth. If you’re tired of seeing your country manipulated by those who owe their loyalty to clans, not constituents, if you want to help expose the networks, protect victims, and take back control of your democracy, then now is the time to stand with us. Want to help stop this? Learn how to fight back. Speak up. Organise. Share this. Support me. And never, ever look away again. Raja Miah MBE _________ For those new to me, I'm Raja Miah MBE. I spent six years leading a small team that exposed how Labour politicians protected Pakistani Rape Gangs and exchanged working class White girls for votes. Both politicians and police have all repeatedly tried and failed to have me imprisoned. My crime? Refusing to look the other way to the gang rape of children. My work continues despite powerful forces including the media, politicians, police and public officials all conspiring to desperately stop me and bury the truth. This includes the recent announcement of my role in The Rape Gang Inquiry team led by Rupert Lowe MP. All of my content is shared for free. I publish all the materials on my website Red Wall and the Rabble. Please subscribe. We really need more numbers. 👉 I only ask for a small contribution if you can afford to do so. Please commit to just £3 a month or £30 for the year to help me continue. 👉 Prefer a one-time contribution? 👉 👉 With no corporate backers or political sponsors, I rely solely on the support of ordinary people who understand what's at stake. No one else is going to come to our rescue. It is up to us. Please help me. Raja 🙏

Raja Miah

71,784 views • 1 year ago

Reynolds American owns famous tobacco brands like Camel, Newport, Lucky Strike, Pall Mall, American Spirit, Grizzly & more. Recently I exposed their woke policies but as a result of talks we held, they’re now ENDING those policies. Specifics ⬇️ • No more Pride event donations • They will END ALL DEI/Affirmative action programs • They will END ALL DEI goals • They will reaffirm that MERIT is their focus • They will END ALL DEI trainings • They will no longer work with the Human Rights Campaign Rapid Response on their woke Corporate Equality Index or similar surveys to the HRC • They will ELIMINATE their "Allyship guide" • They will no longer light their HQ for pride month • They will audit their company top to bottom to eliminate bias or divisive activism they find • Reynolds American will adopt a policy of corporate neutrality on divisive topics • They will take corporate oversight of ERG activities so their logo is never used without approval Reynolds American is another workplace where wokeness is dying because of YOU and the movement we’ve built. This morning their employees were all notified of the changes taking place and in the past few days I’ve received messages from employees who are overjoyed by seeing some of these changes occurring in real time. We’ve now changed policy at companies worth over $5 TRILLION dollars. This is the single most effective movement to change policy in corporate America that we’ve ever had and it’s all thanks to you. I couldn’t do it without you. Together we’ve freed millions of employees from forced woke indoctrination and discrimination. Your support, your voices and your sharing of my videos is why we’re so effective at eliminating wokeness. Also my X subscribers deserve a big shout out — they fund the team here behind these big wins. The tide is turning and while the war isn’t won yet, we’re winning some enormous, enormous battles and separate from this company, there’s some things going on behind the scenes right now that you’re going to be enormously happy about when I’m able to talk about them. I’m not tired of winning yet and I hope you aren’t either. We’re winning and one by one we WILL bring sanity back to corporate America. If you love what we’re doing, subscribe to my X page for $5 a month to help fund our team. You can also support our work here: If you want to expose your woke workplace, send tips to Companies can see that America wants sanity back. The era of wokeness is dying. The landscape of corporate America is quickly shifting to sanity and neutrality. We’re the trend, not the anomaly. So far you’ve helped me change corporate policy at Tractor Supply, John Deere, Harley Davidson, Polaris, Indian Motorcycle, Lowe’s, Ford, Coors, Stanley Black & Decker, Jack Daniels, DeWalt tools, Craftsman, Caterpillar, Boeing, Toyota, Walmart, McDonald’s, META, Target, Accenture, Pepsi, Gatorade, Rockstar Energy, AT&T, Corona Beer, Modelo Beer, Pacifico Beer, IBM and now Reynolds American + all the companies they own! Crazy thing is, that’s not even the full list!!! We’re a force to be reckoned with and we won’t stop until wokeness is extinct.
2:03

Reynolds American owns famous tobacco brands like Camel, Newport, Lucky Strike, Pall Mall, American Spirit, Grizzly & more. Recently I exposed their woke policies but as a result of talks we held, they’re now ENDING those policies. Specifics ⬇️ • No more Pride event donations • They will END ALL DEI/Affirmative action programs • They will END ALL DEI goals • They will reaffirm that MERIT is their focus • They will END ALL DEI trainings • They will no longer work with the Human Rights Campaign Rapid Response on their woke Corporate Equality Index or similar surveys to the HRC • They will ELIMINATE their "Allyship guide" • They will no longer light their HQ for pride month • They will audit their company top to bottom to eliminate bias or divisive activism they find • Reynolds American will adopt a policy of corporate neutrality on divisive topics • They will take corporate oversight of ERG activities so their logo is never used without approval Reynolds American is another workplace where wokeness is dying because of YOU and the movement we’ve built. This morning their employees were all notified of the changes taking place and in the past few days I’ve received messages from employees who are overjoyed by seeing some of these changes occurring in real time. We’ve now changed policy at companies worth over $5 TRILLION dollars. This is the single most effective movement to change policy in corporate America that we’ve ever had and it’s all thanks to you. I couldn’t do it without you. Together we’ve freed millions of employees from forced woke indoctrination and discrimination. Your support, your voices and your sharing of my videos is why we’re so effective at eliminating wokeness. Also my X subscribers deserve a big shout out — they fund the team here behind these big wins. The tide is turning and while the war isn’t won yet, we’re winning some enormous, enormous battles and separate from this company, there’s some things going on behind the scenes right now that you’re going to be enormously happy about when I’m able to talk about them. I’m not tired of winning yet and I hope you aren’t either. We’re winning and one by one we WILL bring sanity back to corporate America. If you love what we’re doing, subscribe to my X page for $5 a month to help fund our team. You can also support our work here: If you want to expose your woke workplace, send tips to Companies can see that America wants sanity back. The era of wokeness is dying. The landscape of corporate America is quickly shifting to sanity and neutrality. We’re the trend, not the anomaly. So far you’ve helped me change corporate policy at Tractor Supply, John Deere, Harley Davidson, Polaris, Indian Motorcycle, Lowe’s, Ford, Coors, Stanley Black & Decker, Jack Daniels, DeWalt tools, Craftsman, Caterpillar, Boeing, Toyota, Walmart, McDonald’s, META, Target, Accenture, Pepsi, Gatorade, Rockstar Energy, AT&T, Corona Beer, Modelo Beer, Pacifico Beer, IBM and now Reynolds American + all the companies they own! Crazy thing is, that’s not even the full list!!! We’re a force to be reckoned with and we won’t stop until wokeness is extinct.

Robby Starbuck

524,206 views • 1 year ago

how I’m building fractl for a $10M exit in 6 months, so I can produce my dream musical 🎤🎬 I don't know how 🤷🏼‍♀️ That's what the show is about ha. Figuring it out, in real time. Wish me luck lol fractl's new docu-series ‘‘The Crypto Hustle’ launches feb 26. Final-fucking-ly. thank you Superteam Canada & Solana for the funding and for making Episode 1 possible 🥰 For those of you who are new here, hiiii 🙋🏼‍♀️ my name is Rime Salmi, I'm an artist who accidentally built the biggest investor network in web3. And now we're producing a 12 episode documentary about how I'm working my way back to being an artist, with funding. the origin story. when I crashed with the last crypto cycle, back to zero (plus tax) at my grown age, I had to ask myself what the hell I was gonna do with my life. I always just wanted be an artist. With agency. So i worked and paid for everything, studio, music videos, started a record label, all that to keep my artistic freedom, for my entire career. Had some success, lots of failed experiments, lots of tears, and lots of fun. After I lost everything to the terra luna crash (mistakes were made 🥲), I had to figure out how I would fund the dream next. I needed a break from the emotional roller coaster of trading crypto, so I went back to school for the grant money (thank you government of Canada). I relocated to madrid for a change, and started making tiktoks. Skits that I thought were funny. Skits that i thought were risky but honest and necessary. I’ve always loved saying out loud what others are ashamed to even think 🤓 if you follow me on ig or tt you know ha I was having a blast. Creating all day. Some tiktoks took off. Ones that felt very personal. I felt seen. I was at my happiest, filming, editing, singing and pretending to listen in class, for the grant money. Then it hit me. That's what i want. I wanna be telling stories. I dont wanna be just a singer, just a songwriter, just an actress waiting for auditions to come my way. I wanna do it all, tell more stories, write and produce them. so…A musical? But I hate musicals 😭 why do they start singing in the middle of a conversation?!? whyyyyy A musical for people who don't like musicals??!!! 🥹 That’s it!! A MUSICAL FOR PEOPLE WHO DONT LIKE MUSICALS 🤩 DONE. So from the lowest of my finances, in the middle of career confusion, with a bruised ego from failing so miserably at my first crypto cycle, I found something great to get excited about for the rest of my life. I needed to validate the feasibility… because I know I’m a dreamer who gets shit done, but I’m very much a idealist. so I asked my good friend of mine and the producer of my first 2 albums Benny Adam (now a rising star, this is me clout chasing) for advice. I asked him: ‘is this too much? For me to wanna produce a whole as* Netflix series, music and all?? He’s the most talented, ambitious yet realistic guy I know. And I knew he would tell it to me like it is, but kindly. Because he’s also a nice human 🫶🏽 ‘So?? Is it too big of a project??’ He paused… I looked at him, hopeful 🥹 ‘Ya. It’s a reeeally big project 😕’, he said. Fuck. and then he paused, again. Just tell me, I thought. Tell me aaaall the reasons this is a bad idea… 😞 beat. ‘But if anyone can do it, it’s you’ cue inspiring battle field music Reeeallyyyyy? 🥹 I teared up. I’m tearing up now writing this. Because at that low point in my life, that’s what I needed. Just one person who really knew me, to remind me, despite my circumstances, of who I am and what I’m capable of. That I’m crazy, yes, but in a good way 👉🏽👈🏽 Shokran Benny. I don’t think you know how much that meant to me (I’m gonna tell him again because he’s on episode 4 of the Crypto Hustle ha) Ok. So. Musical it is. When I ran out of back-to-school government money, and needed to be an adult again, I reintegrated the crypto space, with a purpose. I called my friend and mentor Armando Pantoja and asked him what he thought I should go for in terms of job (I needed a break from entrepreneurship). He said ‘I’ve seen you at conferences, you’re really good with people, you know marketing, and you actually understand crypto. He said go to conferences, you’ll figure it out. Just show up’ I did. I showed up to eth denver 2022 and I started the first iteration of what became fractl as an influencer marketing agency, because I saw a good skill-market fit and because I couldn't find a job lol but I hated it. I dont wanna manage influencers, I don't wanna manage artists. I’m an artist, I would never manage me, that's crazy 😂 One thing led to the other I became a fractional CMO. An opinionated one 🤓 I found myself always trying to lead founders towards personal storytelling… suggesting they put themselves out there more. I really believed that it would help them build trust in a space that so desperately needs it. Then, I started hosting our investor events (to get leads for the agency), and saw the struggle of founders building and fundraising at the same time and the original idea for this show started to form. We need bolder marketing in this space. What if we followed these founders around the world at all these conferences and followed their journey, building a company, raising, launching a token, failing. In these ruthless markets, with the drama of personal sacrifices… I could see it so clearly 😃 So I started pitching it. THE BEST MARKETING CAMPAIGN EVER GUYS!! WHO'S IN?? No one. I couldn't convince a single founder of the vision.🥲 Maybe I wasn’t qualified enough in their eyes to carry out such a big vision, following multiple founders on a 6 month production around the world. They were probably right lol But I’m also a little crazy. And really really stubborn. That's something right?? A few months later, inspiration still strong, I told pablo erminy who's worked on multiple Netflix shows about it and he said: ‘why dont you just tell YOUR story? You have a great story, people will wanna watch you build in public to fund your artist dream. As a first reality tv production, one story is more than enough to handle.’ Wise man. Maybe i did underestimate how complex a multi-lead, international, real-time, film production would be 😬 Done. because I know great advice when I hear it. PIVOT! 🛋️ So that’s how ’The Crypto Hustle’ was born. This journey I was trying to sell to other founders, I would do it for myself. show not tell. Now the funding. I tried selling the project to sponsors on and off for over a year, between the normal fractl operations, hiring, training, firing, messing up, learning. And only ended up spreading myself so thin, that I neglected the core business. Company became a mess (for others reasons too, that I will come up on the show, hint: boys) Bottom line is, we lost more money than we made, trying to sell a show. I should've known. Film fundraising is a producer’s full time job lol Fast forward 1 year, 2 pilots and a near bankruptcy later, I’m now launching Episode 1 from Korea and just wrapping episode 2 from Hong Kong. No funding. (except for Episode 1, thank you again Superteam Canada 🥰) Fuck it. Might not be the big production I had envisioned, but all the core principles and the emotions, and team talent is there.. An MVP. Now. because waiting for things to align would just delay this indefinitely. And because I have more conviction than ever. not only in authentic storytelling as the best marketing, but also because my soul needs this. I need creativity to keep going. If i stay too long in business mode without publishing art, stories, songs, dances, funny skits, I find no reason to wake up in the morning. Not to be dramatic, but I really only wanna be an artist 😂 Also, the timing IS ideal. because in my mess, I got lucky 🥰 I found a production team that felt right instantly. Love at first meeting. not only are they aligned with the docu-series concept, but with the end vision too. The cultural impact I wanna have with the musical. vegetable Badr, Momo, @JuicySocialAgency, you're my favorite part of 2026 🫶🏽 So here we are. About to launch episode 1. Documenting the process of building fractl for a $10M exit in 6 MONTHS, so i can produce my dream musical 🥰 It’s about to be epic. Or a massive failure, in public. can girl with the pink hair make this happen? 👀 let the adventure begin 💚☺️ full episodes will be on my youtube channel. go subscribe ok?
0:51

how I’m building fractl for a $10M exit in 6 months, so I can produce my dream musical 🎤🎬 I don't know how 🤷🏼‍♀️ That's what the show is about ha. Figuring it out, in real time. Wish me luck lol fractl's new docu-series ‘‘The Crypto Hustle’ launches feb 26. Final-fucking-ly. thank you Superteam Canada & Solana for the funding and for making Episode 1 possible 🥰 For those of you who are new here, hiiii 🙋🏼‍♀️ my name is Rime Salmi, I'm an artist who accidentally built the biggest investor network in web3. And now we're producing a 12 episode documentary about how I'm working my way back to being an artist, with funding. the origin story. when I crashed with the last crypto cycle, back to zero (plus tax) at my grown age, I had to ask myself what the hell I was gonna do with my life. I always just wanted be an artist. With agency. So i worked and paid for everything, studio, music videos, started a record label, all that to keep my artistic freedom, for my entire career. Had some success, lots of failed experiments, lots of tears, and lots of fun. After I lost everything to the terra luna crash (mistakes were made 🥲), I had to figure out how I would fund the dream next. I needed a break from the emotional roller coaster of trading crypto, so I went back to school for the grant money (thank you government of Canada). I relocated to madrid for a change, and started making tiktoks. Skits that I thought were funny. Skits that i thought were risky but honest and necessary. I’ve always loved saying out loud what others are ashamed to even think 🤓 if you follow me on ig or tt you know ha I was having a blast. Creating all day. Some tiktoks took off. Ones that felt very personal. I felt seen. I was at my happiest, filming, editing, singing and pretending to listen in class, for the grant money. Then it hit me. That's what i want. I wanna be telling stories. I dont wanna be just a singer, just a songwriter, just an actress waiting for auditions to come my way. I wanna do it all, tell more stories, write and produce them. so…A musical? But I hate musicals 😭 why do they start singing in the middle of a conversation?!? whyyyyy A musical for people who don't like musicals??!!! 🥹 That’s it!! A MUSICAL FOR PEOPLE WHO DONT LIKE MUSICALS 🤩 DONE. So from the lowest of my finances, in the middle of career confusion, with a bruised ego from failing so miserably at my first crypto cycle, I found something great to get excited about for the rest of my life. I needed to validate the feasibility… because I know I’m a dreamer who gets shit done, but I’m very much a idealist. so I asked my good friend of mine and the producer of my first 2 albums Benny Adam (now a rising star, this is me clout chasing) for advice. I asked him: ‘is this too much? For me to wanna produce a whole as* Netflix series, music and all?? He’s the most talented, ambitious yet realistic guy I know. And I knew he would tell it to me like it is, but kindly. Because he’s also a nice human 🫶🏽 ‘So?? Is it too big of a project??’ He paused… I looked at him, hopeful 🥹 ‘Ya. It’s a reeeally big project 😕’, he said. Fuck. and then he paused, again. Just tell me, I thought. Tell me aaaall the reasons this is a bad idea… 😞 beat. ‘But if anyone can do it, it’s you’ cue inspiring battle field music Reeeallyyyyy? 🥹 I teared up. I’m tearing up now writing this. Because at that low point in my life, that’s what I needed. Just one person who really knew me, to remind me, despite my circumstances, of who I am and what I’m capable of. That I’m crazy, yes, but in a good way 👉🏽👈🏽 Shokran Benny. I don’t think you know how much that meant to me (I’m gonna tell him again because he’s on episode 4 of the Crypto Hustle ha) Ok. So. Musical it is. When I ran out of back-to-school government money, and needed to be an adult again, I reintegrated the crypto space, with a purpose. I called my friend and mentor Armando Pantoja and asked him what he thought I should go for in terms of job (I needed a break from entrepreneurship). He said ‘I’ve seen you at conferences, you’re really good with people, you know marketing, and you actually understand crypto. He said go to conferences, you’ll figure it out. Just show up’ I did. I showed up to eth denver 2022 and I started the first iteration of what became fractl as an influencer marketing agency, because I saw a good skill-market fit and because I couldn't find a job lol but I hated it. I dont wanna manage influencers, I don't wanna manage artists. I’m an artist, I would never manage me, that's crazy 😂 One thing led to the other I became a fractional CMO. An opinionated one 🤓 I found myself always trying to lead founders towards personal storytelling… suggesting they put themselves out there more. I really believed that it would help them build trust in a space that so desperately needs it. Then, I started hosting our investor events (to get leads for the agency), and saw the struggle of founders building and fundraising at the same time and the original idea for this show started to form. We need bolder marketing in this space. What if we followed these founders around the world at all these conferences and followed their journey, building a company, raising, launching a token, failing. In these ruthless markets, with the drama of personal sacrifices… I could see it so clearly 😃 So I started pitching it. THE BEST MARKETING CAMPAIGN EVER GUYS!! WHO'S IN?? No one. I couldn't convince a single founder of the vision.🥲 Maybe I wasn’t qualified enough in their eyes to carry out such a big vision, following multiple founders on a 6 month production around the world. They were probably right lol But I’m also a little crazy. And really really stubborn. That's something right?? A few months later, inspiration still strong, I told pablo erminy who's worked on multiple Netflix shows about it and he said: ‘why dont you just tell YOUR story? You have a great story, people will wanna watch you build in public to fund your artist dream. As a first reality tv production, one story is more than enough to handle.’ Wise man. Maybe i did underestimate how complex a multi-lead, international, real-time, film production would be 😬 Done. because I know great advice when I hear it. PIVOT! 🛋️ So that’s how ’The Crypto Hustle’ was born. This journey I was trying to sell to other founders, I would do it for myself. show not tell. Now the funding. I tried selling the project to sponsors on and off for over a year, between the normal fractl operations, hiring, training, firing, messing up, learning. And only ended up spreading myself so thin, that I neglected the core business. Company became a mess (for others reasons too, that I will come up on the show, hint: boys) Bottom line is, we lost more money than we made, trying to sell a show. I should've known. Film fundraising is a producer’s full time job lol Fast forward 1 year, 2 pilots and a near bankruptcy later, I’m now launching Episode 1 from Korea and just wrapping episode 2 from Hong Kong. No funding. (except for Episode 1, thank you again Superteam Canada 🥰) Fuck it. Might not be the big production I had envisioned, but all the core principles and the emotions, and team talent is there.. An MVP. Now. because waiting for things to align would just delay this indefinitely. And because I have more conviction than ever. not only in authentic storytelling as the best marketing, but also because my soul needs this. I need creativity to keep going. If i stay too long in business mode without publishing art, stories, songs, dances, funny skits, I find no reason to wake up in the morning. Not to be dramatic, but I really only wanna be an artist 😂 Also, the timing IS ideal. because in my mess, I got lucky 🥰 I found a production team that felt right instantly. Love at first meeting. not only are they aligned with the docu-series concept, but with the end vision too. The cultural impact I wanna have with the musical. vegetable Badr, Momo, @JuicySocialAgency, you're my favorite part of 2026 🫶🏽 So here we are. About to launch episode 1. Documenting the process of building fractl for a $10M exit in 6 MONTHS, so i can produce my dream musical 🥰 It’s about to be epic. Or a massive failure, in public. can girl with the pink hair make this happen? 👀 let the adventure begin 💚☺️ full episodes will be on my youtube channel. go subscribe ok?

🌸 Rime Salmi 🌸

11,070 views • 7 months ago

We’re in a weird place now where random girls have better insight into male psychology than most ‘pro-male’ accounts. Usually you do not want to take advice from women, but look what these chicks say: ✅ Guys don’t approach because they’re unconfident (TRUE; many men are terrified to an almost hysterical degree of women right now) ✅ Guys don’t approach because they’re lazy (TRUE; “why take the risk of approaching a girl when I can just open up an app?” → something far too many guys think now) ✅ If you get shot down, whatever; just go to the next girl (TRUE; she is not some magical special girl whose rejection has crippled you forever. Go approach another girl, and another after that! Meeting women is a NUMBERS GAME!) ✅ Be kind, don’t be weird (TRUE; there is a difference between being a ‘nice guy’ vs. just being a cool, warm-hearted, sociable dude. You do not have to be some cartoonish ‘alpha male’ and in fact that does not work. The ‘bad boys’ women are attracted to are generally actually kinder people than the average ‘nice guy’ is — they communicate what they really want, do not behave like they feel entitled to something from her, do not place her on a pedestal she can never hope to live up to, and don’t get weird or resentful or depressed when she flirts with or tests them) ✅ Approach with friendship as the basis (TRUE; so long as you do not MISINTERPRET this and think you need to be a neutered, asexual ‘friend’ instead. You need to be her SEXY friend, who is playful and flirtatious and a bit naughty, not the nice guy friend who acts like he has no balls and just wants to be her shoulder to cry on) As a matter of fact, I would actually say women’s advice to men has SOMEHOW STRANGELY IMPROVED over the last 15 years, while most men’s advice to other men has EGREGIOUSLY WORSENED. Men are online telling each other stuff like “you don’t need women; focus on the money and the women will come” (this will get you women who are after “a nice lifestyle”, i.e., gold diggers) and “never tolerate a woman who doesn’t put you first” (newsflash: until you are regularly banging her out, she is NEVER going to put you first!). Honestly, most advice I see men giving other men online nowadays is putting the cart before the horse type advice. Yes, you need money… but you should focus on that AFTER you get her. You are supposed to enjoy women young, then pick a woman and focus on building a life. A lot of dudes have it ass-backwards now. Yes, you need a woman who will put you first… but that comes AFTER you are banging her out. If you want her to do that before you shag her silly, you will be looking for a LONG time, my friend, as well as dating DOWN in a BIG way. Actually I was pretty surprised to hear these girls talk about “if you get rejected, go to the next one.” Back in the day a lot of girls seemed to always treat dating advice like “whatever girl you approach, treat her like your future wife!” Seems like there is a lot more consciousness among women at this point that dating is a numbers game and as a guy you’ve got to put in the reps. Strangely, men seem to have forgotten this… and approaching has become life and death… with dating apps the new ‘safe space’. Strange times we are in!
0:52

We’re in a weird place now where random girls have better insight into male psychology than most ‘pro-male’ accounts. Usually you do not want to take advice from women, but look what these chicks say: ✅ Guys don’t approach because they’re unconfident (TRUE; many men are terrified to an almost hysterical degree of women right now) ✅ Guys don’t approach because they’re lazy (TRUE; “why take the risk of approaching a girl when I can just open up an app?” → something far too many guys think now) ✅ If you get shot down, whatever; just go to the next girl (TRUE; she is not some magical special girl whose rejection has crippled you forever. Go approach another girl, and another after that! Meeting women is a NUMBERS GAME!) ✅ Be kind, don’t be weird (TRUE; there is a difference between being a ‘nice guy’ vs. just being a cool, warm-hearted, sociable dude. You do not have to be some cartoonish ‘alpha male’ and in fact that does not work. The ‘bad boys’ women are attracted to are generally actually kinder people than the average ‘nice guy’ is — they communicate what they really want, do not behave like they feel entitled to something from her, do not place her on a pedestal she can never hope to live up to, and don’t get weird or resentful or depressed when she flirts with or tests them) ✅ Approach with friendship as the basis (TRUE; so long as you do not MISINTERPRET this and think you need to be a neutered, asexual ‘friend’ instead. You need to be her SEXY friend, who is playful and flirtatious and a bit naughty, not the nice guy friend who acts like he has no balls and just wants to be her shoulder to cry on) As a matter of fact, I would actually say women’s advice to men has SOMEHOW STRANGELY IMPROVED over the last 15 years, while most men’s advice to other men has EGREGIOUSLY WORSENED. Men are online telling each other stuff like “you don’t need women; focus on the money and the women will come” (this will get you women who are after “a nice lifestyle”, i.e., gold diggers) and “never tolerate a woman who doesn’t put you first” (newsflash: until you are regularly banging her out, she is NEVER going to put you first!). Honestly, most advice I see men giving other men online nowadays is putting the cart before the horse type advice. Yes, you need money… but you should focus on that AFTER you get her. You are supposed to enjoy women young, then pick a woman and focus on building a life. A lot of dudes have it ass-backwards now. Yes, you need a woman who will put you first… but that comes AFTER you are banging her out. If you want her to do that before you shag her silly, you will be looking for a LONG time, my friend, as well as dating DOWN in a BIG way. Actually I was pretty surprised to hear these girls talk about “if you get rejected, go to the next one.” Back in the day a lot of girls seemed to always treat dating advice like “whatever girl you approach, treat her like your future wife!” Seems like there is a lot more consciousness among women at this point that dating is a numbers game and as a guy you’ve got to put in the reps. Strangely, men seem to have forgotten this… and approaching has become life and death… with dating apps the new ‘safe space’. Strange times we are in!

Girls Chase 🏃‍♀️💨

32,048 views • 7 months ago

Susanna Reid, "What did Nigel Farage say to you when you were both at Dulwich college together?" Peter Ettedgui, "He regularly would come up to me and say Hitler was right, and he's also come up to me and go, gas them" Susanna Reid, "Are you Jewish?" Peter Ettedgui, "Yes" Susanna Reid, "So he was specifically targeting you because you were Jewish, with the most hurtful comment?" Peter Ettedgui, "Yeah, absolutely" "My German Jewish grandparents had escaped Nazi Germany in 1937, so I kind of grew up knowing about the Holocaust and everything that had happened" "This was the first time I had ever been targeted for antisemitic abuse in my life" "I have to say it was also the last time. I have since never remotely had anyone say anything like that to me" Susanna Reid, "How old were you at the time?" Peter Ettedgui, "Between the ages of 13 and 14" "When I was first approached to talk about this back in 2013, I felt that it was an unfair thing to do. And it was only after Nigel Farage denied it, that I had to say something, because there's no way he couldn't remember" "I was really worried that it was one person's word against another, but what has come up in the more recent reporting there's a large number of people who not only corroborate my experience but have their own experience" Ed Balls, "Nigel Farage has at times said this is untrue. At other times said it's playground banter. That it was a long time ago. That there was no intent to cause harm" *GMB play the clip of Farage denying antisemitism" Ed Balls, "He's never directly racially abused anybody" Jean-Pierre Lihou, "That's not true" "Peter and I were good friends at school, and I've heard it live" Susanna Reid, "So you weren't the target of Nigel Farage's comments but you witnessed them. Were there any others?" Jean-Pierre Lihou, "Yeah, anybody who wasn't white would likely to have a comment" "That was for many years. We're talking 13-14, all the way up to senior school" Susanna Reid, "So what else did you witness?" Jean-Pierre Lihou, "Anybody who was not white, Nigel Farage would go up to and say useless, or, send them home" "Nigel Farage used to draw NF (National Front) all over his schoolbooks, with pride" "When I came over from Belgium at the time as a ten year old, my father was in the military, my mother was from Germany" "While I had no conflicts with Nigel Farage, it was odd to come to this big school in London and to have such an obvious thing" Ed Balls, "Playground banter. We all grew up in the 1970s. It was harsh then. People said things on television about disability which you wouldn't say now" "But, the Nazi's were right and the hissing of the gas chamber" Jean-Pierre Lihou, "When you think about it its crazy" "When I used to be called, because I'm from Germany, the K word, but you say, things you couldn't imagine saying now" "That's the point. When you look online, those things are starting to come out again, and that's the dangerous thing" Susanna Reid, "Was this a one off?" Peter Ettedgui, "No. We were in the same class. Neighbouring desks because we were seated in alphabetical order" "This was, whenever he saw me. It was almost a kind of gut reflex when he saw me" "I was very struck by an interview a classmate gave to The Guardian the other day, where he said, I don't understand why Peter took it, why he didn't react" "I think learnt to throw a protective cloak over myself and ignore him" "I found my own tribe at school, and it wasn't all bad" "So I kind of got on with my life" "That experience marked me" "Antisemitism is often called the oldest hatred, and when I think of the oldest hatred, it's Nigel Farage's face that I see in front of me" "I'd like to pick up on this thing about it being the 1970s, it was a different time, you're absolutely right" "But words like, the K word, the Y word, the Jews, the P word, those were being thrown around" "Nigel Farage was of a completely different order" "The regularity, the intention with which he did this, to so many pupils of different races" Jean-Pierre Lihou, "The singing of the song: gas them all" "He used to regularly sing that at school" "It's horrendous. I don't want to sing it on TV" Peter Ettedgui, "Another story has come out from another Jewish pupil, younger than me, who remembers Farage and his pals waiting outside Jewish assembly, waiting to taunt the kids coming out" Ed Balls, "Nigel Farage says he didn't ay any of these things with intent" "But standing outside the Jewish assembly at Dulwich college to say things about the Nazis, feels like it has some intent" Peter Ettedgui, "A great deal of intent" Jean-Pierre Lihou, "Regular" Peter Ettedgui, "Yeah, and the targeting of other students of ethnic minorities waiting at the school gates" Ed Balls, "Last night Nigel Farage told us that the stories they are telling about him from 50 years ago are not true" Jean-Pierre Lihou, "It said these things also when he was 14, 15, 16, 17, when the issue of the prefect of the nomination came up, it wasn't just 50 years ago when he was 11" Ed Balls, "He says the two of you are politically motivated" Jean-Pierre Lihou, "I don't have any political affiliations at all" Peter Ettedgui, "And neither do I" "There isn't a political, but a deeply personal motivation" "I do not want to see a school bully become my prime minister" "That probably goes for all 20+ people who have spoken out about his behaviour at school"
9:02

Susanna Reid, "What did Nigel Farage say to you when you were both at Dulwich college together?" Peter Ettedgui, "He regularly would come up to me and say Hitler was right, and he's also come up to me and go, gas them" Susanna Reid, "Are you Jewish?" Peter Ettedgui, "Yes" Susanna Reid, "So he was specifically targeting you because you were Jewish, with the most hurtful comment?" Peter Ettedgui, "Yeah, absolutely" "My German Jewish grandparents had escaped Nazi Germany in 1937, so I kind of grew up knowing about the Holocaust and everything that had happened" "This was the first time I had ever been targeted for antisemitic abuse in my life" "I have to say it was also the last time. I have since never remotely had anyone say anything like that to me" Susanna Reid, "How old were you at the time?" Peter Ettedgui, "Between the ages of 13 and 14" "When I was first approached to talk about this back in 2013, I felt that it was an unfair thing to do. And it was only after Nigel Farage denied it, that I had to say something, because there's no way he couldn't remember" "I was really worried that it was one person's word against another, but what has come up in the more recent reporting there's a large number of people who not only corroborate my experience but have their own experience" Ed Balls, "Nigel Farage has at times said this is untrue. At other times said it's playground banter. That it was a long time ago. That there was no intent to cause harm" *GMB play the clip of Farage denying antisemitism" Ed Balls, "He's never directly racially abused anybody" Jean-Pierre Lihou, "That's not true" "Peter and I were good friends at school, and I've heard it live" Susanna Reid, "So you weren't the target of Nigel Farage's comments but you witnessed them. Were there any others?" Jean-Pierre Lihou, "Yeah, anybody who wasn't white would likely to have a comment" "That was for many years. We're talking 13-14, all the way up to senior school" Susanna Reid, "So what else did you witness?" Jean-Pierre Lihou, "Anybody who was not white, Nigel Farage would go up to and say useless, or, send them home" "Nigel Farage used to draw NF (National Front) all over his schoolbooks, with pride" "When I came over from Belgium at the time as a ten year old, my father was in the military, my mother was from Germany" "While I had no conflicts with Nigel Farage, it was odd to come to this big school in London and to have such an obvious thing" Ed Balls, "Playground banter. We all grew up in the 1970s. It was harsh then. People said things on television about disability which you wouldn't say now" "But, the Nazi's were right and the hissing of the gas chamber" Jean-Pierre Lihou, "When you think about it its crazy" "When I used to be called, because I'm from Germany, the K word, but you say, things you couldn't imagine saying now" "That's the point. When you look online, those things are starting to come out again, and that's the dangerous thing" Susanna Reid, "Was this a one off?" Peter Ettedgui, "No. We were in the same class. Neighbouring desks because we were seated in alphabetical order" "This was, whenever he saw me. It was almost a kind of gut reflex when he saw me" "I was very struck by an interview a classmate gave to The Guardian the other day, where he said, I don't understand why Peter took it, why he didn't react" "I think learnt to throw a protective cloak over myself and ignore him" "I found my own tribe at school, and it wasn't all bad" "So I kind of got on with my life" "That experience marked me" "Antisemitism is often called the oldest hatred, and when I think of the oldest hatred, it's Nigel Farage's face that I see in front of me" "I'd like to pick up on this thing about it being the 1970s, it was a different time, you're absolutely right" "But words like, the K word, the Y word, the Jews, the P word, those were being thrown around" "Nigel Farage was of a completely different order" "The regularity, the intention with which he did this, to so many pupils of different races" Jean-Pierre Lihou, "The singing of the song: gas them all" "He used to regularly sing that at school" "It's horrendous. I don't want to sing it on TV" Peter Ettedgui, "Another story has come out from another Jewish pupil, younger than me, who remembers Farage and his pals waiting outside Jewish assembly, waiting to taunt the kids coming out" Ed Balls, "Nigel Farage says he didn't ay any of these things with intent" "But standing outside the Jewish assembly at Dulwich college to say things about the Nazis, feels like it has some intent" Peter Ettedgui, "A great deal of intent" Jean-Pierre Lihou, "Regular" Peter Ettedgui, "Yeah, and the targeting of other students of ethnic minorities waiting at the school gates" Ed Balls, "Last night Nigel Farage told us that the stories they are telling about him from 50 years ago are not true" Jean-Pierre Lihou, "It said these things also when he was 14, 15, 16, 17, when the issue of the prefect of the nomination came up, it wasn't just 50 years ago when he was 11" Ed Balls, "He says the two of you are politically motivated" Jean-Pierre Lihou, "I don't have any political affiliations at all" Peter Ettedgui, "And neither do I" "There isn't a political, but a deeply personal motivation" "I do not want to see a school bully become my prime minister" "That probably goes for all 20+ people who have spoken out about his behaviour at school"

Farrukh

1,841,972 views • 10 months ago

Pakistani Cartels, Sectarians & Islamists The Lasting Legacy of Labour in Muslim Majority Communities This promotional video demonstrates the attempted open takeover of Oldham. It was shared on Facebook by the Pakistani Muslim political faction who call themselves The Oldham Group. The men running it are connected through the Biraderi clan network. Many have longstanding links to organised crime groups. They no longer need the Labour Party and are now moving to openly seizing control of Oldham Council. Look at that video. Where are the women? Where are the White people? Where are the other minorities? In a town that supposedly values equality and diversity, the political machinery inside Muslim majority wards excludes everyone except one group of men. Women vanish. White working class residents disappear. African Caribbean, Eastern European, South East Asian and Middle Eastern communities are barred from the room. This isn't diversity. It's political segregation controlled by one bloc. The Pakistani bloc. When women disappear from political life, safeguarding collapses. When White residents and other minorities are pushed out, scrutiny dies. That is when grooming gangs thrive, corruption spreads and criminal networks entrench themselves. What's left is a political structure held together by silence, intimidation and loyalty to the group rather than the public. This video isn't just a snapshot. It's a warning. A closed circle claiming ownership over a multiethnic town. This is what happens when Labour allows sectarian power blocs to dominate entire wards without scrutiny or challenge. These are the consequences of decades of vote harvesting, patronage and political cowardice. People ask me how towns like Oldham end up captured by Pakistani sectarians and Islamists. How organised cartels working with corrupt councillors and compromised police officers manage to turn working class communities into personal territories. This is how. A small group builds control, eliminates scrutiny, bars outsiders, and runs the place as if it belongs to them alone. I've spent seven years documenting exactly how it works. Not through rumour but evidence, witness testimony and the lived experience of families abandoned by institutions meant to protect them. For telling the truth I've been arrested, smeared as racist, dragged through courts and targeted by public bodies that preferred comfortable lies over accountability. I'd do it again because what I uncovered frightens them more than any riot ever could. Oldham isn't unique. Across Britain the same pattern repeats. Pakistani and Bangladeshi political blocs. Sectarian enforcers. Islamist influence networks. A layer of so-called community leaders controlling access to funding, favours and political careers. Democracy becomes performance rather than reality. These networks rely on one assumption: that ordinary people will never understand how the system really operates. That no one will question who's missing from the room. That the public will accept managed theatre while power gets captured by a narrow, self-interested circle. They assumed no one was watching. They assumed no one would speak. They were wrong. My work exposes their lies. I follow the money, uncover the cover-ups, show how political patronage, organised crime and religious sectarianism merge into a single machine capable of capturing entire towns. I also give people tools to take their communities back through lawful, strategic, persistent action. This is why they want me silenced. Once people understand the playbook they can't be controlled. Once they see whose voices have been erased they refuse to be silent again. I now travel across the United Kingdom helping communities learn exactly how to do that. You can support this work and defend your own town or watch it slide in the same direction as Oldham. Everything I produce is free. I meet, teach and train at no cost because if this is allowed to continue, then there will be nothing left for any of us. _________ This isn't about politics anymore. It's about preservation of a ruling clique defending its own survival, even if it means abandoning the very people they swore to protect. The nation does not need silence. It needs truth. This is not only a child abuse scandal. It is a crisis of truth, trust and governance in modern Britain. I am Raja Miah. For seven years, I led a small team that exposed how politicians protected the rape gangs. I cannot do this on my own. I need you to stand with me. We’re running out of time. Without the numbers, they will win. It’s as simple as that. 🔴 Subscribe to my newsletter – it’s free. Or support the work for just 75p a week (£3/month or £30/year). Whatever you do, please subscribe; This is the fight. This is the moment. There will not be another. 🔴 Prefer a one-off contribution? 👉 👉 No corporate sponsors. No party machine. And still blacklisted by the legacy media. Just you and thousands of ordinary people who know what’s at stake. We’ve come this far. Help finish it. Raja Miah MBE
0:30

Pakistani Cartels, Sectarians & Islamists The Lasting Legacy of Labour in Muslim Majority Communities This promotional video demonstrates the attempted open takeover of Oldham. It was shared on Facebook by the Pakistani Muslim political faction who call themselves The Oldham Group. The men running it are connected through the Biraderi clan network. Many have longstanding links to organised crime groups. They no longer need the Labour Party and are now moving to openly seizing control of Oldham Council. Look at that video. Where are the women? Where are the White people? Where are the other minorities? In a town that supposedly values equality and diversity, the political machinery inside Muslim majority wards excludes everyone except one group of men. Women vanish. White working class residents disappear. African Caribbean, Eastern European, South East Asian and Middle Eastern communities are barred from the room. This isn't diversity. It's political segregation controlled by one bloc. The Pakistani bloc. When women disappear from political life, safeguarding collapses. When White residents and other minorities are pushed out, scrutiny dies. That is when grooming gangs thrive, corruption spreads and criminal networks entrench themselves. What's left is a political structure held together by silence, intimidation and loyalty to the group rather than the public. This video isn't just a snapshot. It's a warning. A closed circle claiming ownership over a multiethnic town. This is what happens when Labour allows sectarian power blocs to dominate entire wards without scrutiny or challenge. These are the consequences of decades of vote harvesting, patronage and political cowardice. People ask me how towns like Oldham end up captured by Pakistani sectarians and Islamists. How organised cartels working with corrupt councillors and compromised police officers manage to turn working class communities into personal territories. This is how. A small group builds control, eliminates scrutiny, bars outsiders, and runs the place as if it belongs to them alone. I've spent seven years documenting exactly how it works. Not through rumour but evidence, witness testimony and the lived experience of families abandoned by institutions meant to protect them. For telling the truth I've been arrested, smeared as racist, dragged through courts and targeted by public bodies that preferred comfortable lies over accountability. I'd do it again because what I uncovered frightens them more than any riot ever could. Oldham isn't unique. Across Britain the same pattern repeats. Pakistani and Bangladeshi political blocs. Sectarian enforcers. Islamist influence networks. A layer of so-called community leaders controlling access to funding, favours and political careers. Democracy becomes performance rather than reality. These networks rely on one assumption: that ordinary people will never understand how the system really operates. That no one will question who's missing from the room. That the public will accept managed theatre while power gets captured by a narrow, self-interested circle. They assumed no one was watching. They assumed no one would speak. They were wrong. My work exposes their lies. I follow the money, uncover the cover-ups, show how political patronage, organised crime and religious sectarianism merge into a single machine capable of capturing entire towns. I also give people tools to take their communities back through lawful, strategic, persistent action. This is why they want me silenced. Once people understand the playbook they can't be controlled. Once they see whose voices have been erased they refuse to be silent again. I now travel across the United Kingdom helping communities learn exactly how to do that. You can support this work and defend your own town or watch it slide in the same direction as Oldham. Everything I produce is free. I meet, teach and train at no cost because if this is allowed to continue, then there will be nothing left for any of us. _________ This isn't about politics anymore. It's about preservation of a ruling clique defending its own survival, even if it means abandoning the very people they swore to protect. The nation does not need silence. It needs truth. This is not only a child abuse scandal. It is a crisis of truth, trust and governance in modern Britain. I am Raja Miah. For seven years, I led a small team that exposed how politicians protected the rape gangs. I cannot do this on my own. I need you to stand with me. We’re running out of time. Without the numbers, they will win. It’s as simple as that. 🔴 Subscribe to my newsletter – it’s free. Or support the work for just 75p a week (£3/month or £30/year). Whatever you do, please subscribe; This is the fight. This is the moment. There will not be another. 🔴 Prefer a one-off contribution? 👉 👉 No corporate sponsors. No party machine. And still blacklisted by the legacy media. Just you and thousands of ordinary people who know what’s at stake. We’ve come this far. Help finish it. Raja Miah MBE

Raja Miah

22,951 views • 10 months ago

BOOM!!! 💥💥💥 Dr. Aseem Malhotra's testimony was delivered in the Helsinski District Court on April 12, 2024, with the understanding that any deviation from the truth would constitute perjury. This clip was immediately banned by YouTube so please share widely. I've trimmed the clip, removing the interpreter's segment for a smoother listening experience. Here's the first hour of the testimony. ---------------------------------- My name is Doctor Aseem Malhotra. I am a consultant cardiologist. I've been a qualified doctor since 2001. I have held various roles both in academic health policy. In England, in the United Kingdom, and of the various roles, I won't bore you with all the details. I think three of the most relevant and prominent are the fact that I was an ambassador for the Academy of Medical Royal Colleges for six years, which represented every doctor in the UK. I served a full term of six years as a trustee of the King's fund. I was the youngest member to be appointed to this body which advises government on health policy. I was a founding member of Action on Sugar and a first science director. And through that role I'm considered the lead campaigner on bringing about a sugary drinks tax in the UK. And also, finally I served for five years as visiting professor of evidence based medicine at the Bahiana School of Medicine in Salvador, Brazil. In early 2020, at the beginning of the pandemic I was most vocal doctor on the mainstream, making the link very early on between COVID and those who are vulnerable to suffering serious complications from COVID In fact, in March 2020, I was asked to go on Sky News to explain my initial research findings of the link between especially obesity and COVID, but also to give people an opportunity and to suggest to the government this was a great time for them to implement public health policy to help people enhance or optimise their immune system, which could happen within just a few weeks of dietary changes and optimising vitamin D. This was later also backed up by medical journal publications a few months later. And I was first to mention on the back of an article I published in the Daily Telegraph newspaper, which became a front page commentary and was picked up by BBC News and Good Morning Britain, where I had said that it's likely our prime minister, Boris Johnson, was hospitalised because of his weight. As a result of that, the then secretary for health, Matt Hancock, and this was publicised in the news, had asked me to advise him on the link between COVID and obesity. ...before I explain my journey and in many ways U-turn on my understanding in terms of the benefits and harms of the COVID vaccine, my experience in this area over the last couple of years has made me realise more than ever that even for that the greatest barrier to the truth are not factual or intellectual barriers, but psychological. I think all of us as human beings are vulnerable to these psychological barriers and we should have compassion for ourselves. And I will just very briefly summarise those three psychological barriers before I get into my detailed account of what I was involved in in regards to the COVID vaccine. The first psychological barrier is one of fear. And many of us understandably, and I still remember from early on in the pandemic, we were all scared. We did not know what we were dealing with. The issue with fear is that when people and populations are in a state of fear, we are less likely to engage in critical thinking and we are more likely to be compliant. Although COVID was particularly devastating for vulnerable groups in the elderly and I even have managed and still manage people with long COVID, the fear was grossly exaggerated. And one of the examples of that is that when we had good information on the mortality rate of COVID in the United States, one survey in 2020 revealed that 50% of Americans believed that if they caught COVID, the risk of 19 hospitalisation was 50% one and two, when the actual figure, certainly an average for people in middle age, was less than 1%. The second barrier to the truth, which I think is very relevant to the situation we find ourselves in now, is one called willful blindness. This is when human beings, all of us, are vulnerable to this, turn a blind eye to the truth in order to feel safe, avoid conflict, reduce anxiety and to protect prestige and fragile egos. Some examples of this include, on a personal level, willful blindness can occur when a spouse turns a blind eye to the affair of their partner. On an institutional level, some great examples of willful blindness include Hollywood and Harvey Weinstein, the Catholic Church and child molestation. I believe the current situation we find ourselves in, with much of the mainstream narrative and the medical establishment and policy makers not acknowledging quite horrific, serious and common harms from this vaccine, is another example of willful blindness. And I also say this with full empathy, because I was one of those people that was for a very long time, willfully blind to the harms of the COVID vaccine. In January 2021, I was one of the first people to take two doses of the COVID mRNA vaccine because I volunteered in a vaccine centre. I still believe that traditional vaccines are some of the safest amongst all pharmacological interventions in medicine and I could not conceive of any possibility whatsoever of this vaccine causing harm. As a public figure and respected doctor in the UK, I have built relationships across the board with many other public figures, including celebrities and politicians, who often come to me for medical advice. One of those people was film director Gurinder Chadha, who you may be familiar with some of her work, including the movie "Bend It like Beckham", who had asked me whether or not she should take the vaccine and had sent me blogs which I dismissed and regarded as anti vax nonsense. I was then asked to go on good morning, Britain because Gurinder Chadha, the director herself tweeted that I had convinced her to take the vaccine. The main reason for this TV appearance was to help tackle vaccine hesitancy, which was very prominent amongst people from ethnic minority groups in the UK. I made the point on that programme that I understand where vaccine hesitancy was coming from because of the history that I have been involved with over many years in highlighting the shortcomings of pharmaceutical industry influence over medicine. And I even made the point, if I remember correctly, that they have been found guilty of fraud on many occasions, that the third most common cause of death, prepandemic after heart disease and cancer, is prescribed medications. I, however, reassured the public and said that despite these figures, of everything we do in medicine, traditional vaccinations are amongst the safest. I still believe this to be the case. A few months later, in April 2021, I met with a colleague and friend of mine who I regard as one of the brightest cardiologists in the United Kingdom. I was surprised when he told me that he had not taken the COVID vaccine. He explained to me that he had concerns because he had seen in the supplementary appendix of Pfizer's original trial that there were four cardiac arrests in the vaccine group and only one in the placebo. These numbers were small and did not reach statistical significance. So this could be random chance, or his concern was it could represent a signal of problems in the future. And if this was the case, we are going to have a huge problem. He said he'd rather wait and see what happens before taking the vaccine. On July 26, 2021, my father, aged 73, who was a very prominent, well known doctor in the UK, including being the honorary vice president of the British Medical Association and had received honours from the Queen of England with an OBE, suffered an unexpected sudden cardiac arrest. I was particularly devastated by this happening and I was also I find it difficult to understand why my father, who was a fit and well man, I knew his cardiac history and his cardiac status, would suffer a cardiac arrest. But also my initial investigation was to try and understand why there had been a 30 minutes ambulance delay arriving to his apartment. Two weeks later, the deputy chief nurse of NHS England, a government health body, called me up. She was very upset, she knew my father very well and she was crying and she told me, Aseem, there's something I need to tell you. She in effect told me that throughout the country, for the last two months prior to my father's cardiac arrest in most regions of the UK, ambulances were not getting to patients in time for heart attacks and cardiac arrests. And there had been a deliberate, and I will use these words because I mentioned it, I've mentioned it before, a cover up involving the government and the Department of Health to withhold this information from doctors and the public. I worked with an investigative journalist with the I newspaper in the UK to write an article and a news story that became BBC News headlines a few months later, exposing this. Just before I exposed this, I messaged a professor of cardiology who I trust in the UK. He has a leadership role to explain to him what had happened and what I was about to do. I have text message evidence of this. He told me not to do this because it would make me enemies. I explained to him that I had a duty to patients and the public. I'm highlighting this as one example and I'll give you more examples of a cultural problem within medicine. The next part of this story is the post mortem findings of my father. They did not make any sense to me. I am considered a leading expert, maybe in the world, on the development and progression of coronary artery disease. My father had two severe blockages in his coronary arteries. There was no actual evidence of heart attack and likely there was a rhythm disturbance because of reduced blood supply that led to his cardiac arrest. Then in, within the space of a few weeks, around October and November, 3, different sources of information was brought to my attention that made me realise that there was probably a significant problem with the COVID mRNA vaccine. The first in October 2021. I remember I was giving lectures in Stockholm. I was contacted by a journalist with a Times newspaper who reported to me and said, Dr Malhotra, we have reports of an unexplained 25% increase in heart attacks in hospitals in Scotland and asked me what I thought was going on. I explained to her that at that time, with the evidence I knew in my own experience, I said that two likely contributory factors were lockdown stress. We know that when populations undergo severe stress after war, for example, there is an increase in heart attacks and strokes that can last for many years. She asked me whether I thought that there was a contribution. I was surprised when she asked me whether I thought there may be a contribution of the COVID vaccine to these heart attacks. I said to her, a good scientist should never exclude any possibility. But I felt at the time it was unlikely to be related to the COVID vaccine. But we should watch this space and keep our eyes open. A few weeks later, a publication appeared in the Journal Circulation, which is considered the highest impact cardiology journal in the United States that revealed a potentially very strong link between the COVID mRNA vaccines and acceleration in heart attack risk. Very specifically, in several hundred people of middle age, there was a plausible mechanism, by use of inflammatory markers in the blood, that increased the baseline risk of those people having a heart attack in five years, from 11% to 25%, just within two months of having the COVID mRNA vaccines. Of course, this is one bit of data, but even if partially true, that is a huge increase in risk in a very short space of time. And for me now made me think and link back to why my father may have suffered a cardiac arrest six months after having two doses of the vaccine. I remember thinking and speaking to a colleague, that if this was true, then we were going to see an increase in cardiac arrests, heart attacks and excess deaths in heavily vaccinated countries for the next few years. Then within a few weeks, I was called up by a whistleblower at a very prestigious british institution. I will name that institution, which I have not done publicly before as a University of Oxford. This cardiologist explained to me that a group of researchers in his department had accidentally found, through the use of very specialised imaging of the heart, that there was a signal of increased inflammation of the heart arteries, which was there in the vaccinated, but not there in the unvaccinated. The lead researcher of that group had sat down, the juniors, and had said that we are not going to explore these findings any further because it may affect our funding from the pharmaceutical industry. At that point, with these three bits of information, I then felt it was my ethical duty to speak out. And I went on GBNews to talk about what I'd found what I'd heard and I'd asked for the Vaccine Committee of the UK on TV to investigate this, to see whether there was a real problem with the vaccine in relation to heart issues. Around the same time which I found very strange is that the Secretary of State for Health at that stage, who was not Matt Hancock, was Sajid Javid, had announced in parliament that we are going to introduce legislation to ensure that all healthcare workers are mandated to have the COVID vaccine. For me, this, by that stage had no ethical or scientific justification, because certainly after the summer of 2021, it had become very apparent that the COVID mRNA vaccine was not stopping infection and it certainly was not stopping transmission. It was understood that approximately 80,000 NHS workers had refused at this stage to have the COVID vaccine. And now they were threatened with losing their job if by April the following year they had not been fully vaccinated. Many of these people were very concerned and contacted me around that time, I was also conducting many interviews, both through the BBC and Sky News and GBNews in regards to what happened with my father's ambulance delay. And I used it as an opportunity on the mainstream media to call for Sajid Javid, the secretary for health, to U-turn on the introduction of a mandate for healthcare workers based upon the fact that I felt it was not scientific and it was unethical. I also received my own personal backlash from these comments where I was contacted by the Royal College of Physicians who I had an affiliation with, and they asked me to respond to anonymous complaints from doctors that I was spreading, in quotes, antivax disinformation. I felt with my own knowledge and experience of the healthcare system that this was a direct response probably fueled by a combination of willful blindness and institutional corruption. To elaborate a bit further, when I say institutional corruption, I mean that my view was that the complaints were likely being fueled by academics with financial ties to the pharmaceutical industry. I felt very concerned about the potential introduction of the vaccine, well, the vaccine mandate. And therefore I decided there were two things that I decided to do. The first was I made a phone call to the chairman of the British Medical Association in December 2021. I had a good relationship with him and he respected my opinion. And I spent 2 hours on the phone explaining to him everything that I knew up to that stage about my concerns of the COVID mRNA vaccine. He said to me, "Aseem, nobody appears to critically appraise the evidence on the COVID mRNA vaccine as well as you have from our conversation, he said, most of my colleagues are getting their information on the benefits and harms of the vaccine from the BBC". This was replicated by the former chair of the CDC in the United States, Rochelle Walensky, who in an interview later on had said that her initial optimism of the vaccine benefits came from CNN News report. I say this just to emphasise that we should all accept our vulnerabilities to where we receive health information. Even doctors, policymakers, judges and lawyers are all influenced on the public massively by mainstream media. The chairman of the BMA also agreed with me. There was no ethical or scientific justification for mandating the COVID vaccine. He said the BMA also did not support it. And he said because of my conversation with him, he would speak directly to the secretary for health, Sajid Javid. One month later, at the end of January 2022, the COVID vaccine mandate for healthcare workers was overturned. I at that stage, given the fact that there was some backlash happening towards me, I realised that because this is a very big issue and area, and not my initial area of expertise, I needed to carry out my own critical analysis of the COVID mRNA vaccines. I spent six to nine months critically appraising the data, including speaking to two Pfizer whistleblowers, three investigative medical journalists and eminent scientists from the University of Oxford, Stanford and Harvard. The most critical bit, the most critical research that was published on this issue, which I think the whole court should acknowledge in August 2022, was published in the journal Vaccine. That research was conducted by some of the world's top independent of drug industry influence academics. That research, we was able to reanalyze the original randomised control trials conducted by Pfizer and Moderna. They were able to do this because new information was made available on the FDA's website and Health Canada's website. The conclusions of that paper were really very disturbing. The original trials that led to the drug regulatory approval of these vaccines revealed that you were more likely to suffer serious harm from taking the vaccine, specifically hospitalisation, life changing event or disability, than you were to be hospitalised with COVID That rate of harm at two months was very high at 1 in 800. Just to give you some perspective, historically we have suspended other vaccines for much less. In 1976, the swine flu vaccine was pulled because it was found to cause a neurological syndrome called Guillain-Barre syndrome In one in 100,000 people. In 1999, the rotavirus vaccine was suspended because it was found to cause a form of bowel obstruction in children affecting 1 in 10,000. This was 1 in 800. In my view, it was very clear that given this information, published in the highest impact Vaccine journal in the world, peer reviewed, and has not had any significant rebuttals, that this vaccine now, in my view, should never have been approved for use in a single human being in the first place. In my view, this very important court case in some ways, actually is a distraction from the much bigger issue, which is there should be court cases around the world with a full inquiry into the pharmaceutical industry and an inquiry as to how we got this so very wrong. Of course, one could argue this is just one bit of research, but actually, unfortunately, there are different, many different strands of research that are showing a signal of considerable and common serious harm from these vaccines. From pharmacovigilance data that is reporting what we call yellow card reports from the public. We have plausible biological mechanism of harm. We have other research called observational data. We have autopsy data also confirming that certainly with the majority of people who died within a short space of time of having the vaccine in relation to the heart, was definitively caused by the vaccine. This is really a very, very, very horrific situation we find ourselves in. One would hope and expect that the regulators should be independently evaluating all medications. But of course, the evidence reveals this is far from true. There was an investigation by the BMJ, also published in the summer of 2022, which revealed that most of the major regulators across the world were taking most of their money from the drug industry. For example, the MHRA in the UK receives 86% of its funding from the drug industry, and the FDA in America receives 65% of its funding from the drug industry, A fact that most doctors do not know. And therefore, I would not expect members of the court to know this either, is that very, very rarely do drug industry sponsored research get independently evaluated. Clinical trial data can often involve thousands of pages of information on individual patients. The drug companies hold onto that raw data. They then give summary results to the regulator, who are then paying, who have an incentive to approve the drugs, and the drugs are then approved. I made these points in my peer reviewed article published in the Journal of Insulin Resistance in September 2022, where I concluded that we should pause and investigate the issue around the COVID mRNA vaccines. I have since then been campaigning and advocating for a return to ethical evidence based medical practise around the world. Some of the clear solutions moving forward would be changes in the law that are required so that patients, doctors, members of the public can have greater confidence in the information they receive to make decisions about their health. Two very clear, low hanging fruit solutions, which are both ethical, scientific and democratic, would be that the drug industry should be allowed to develop drugs, but they shouldn't be allowed to test them themselves. And they certainly shouldn't be allowed to design their own research to and hold onto the raw data. Their information needs to be independently evaluated. One other clear solution would also be that the medical regulators, again, should not be taking any money from the industry, as this is a gross conflict of interest. I also want to highlight for people to understand the bigger picture. Prior to the pandemic, I had realised that there was a big problem with the reliability of clinical research, where invariably the results of clinical trials on all drugs sponsored by the drug industry, grossly exaggerate their safety and benefits. I have taken this information to the European Parliament, where I spoke in 2019, and I spoke to very senior politicians in the UK government. But although they were sympathetic, they felt that the issue was much bigger than them as individuals, and therefore it also needed media attention to get public awareness on the importance of such an inquiry. Before we continue with further questions, as I've been speaking for quite a long time now I'll just finish with two references just for the court and the judges to understand just how bad this problem is. Prepandemic the man who I call the Stephen Hawking of medicine is Professor John Ioannidis from the University of Stanford. The reason I call him the Stephen Hawking of Medicine is he's the most cited medical researcher in the world and is a mathematical genius. In 2006, he published a paper which was entitled why most published research findings are false. In that paper, he makes a point that the greater the financial interests in a given field, the less likely the research findings are to be true. I say this in context of the Pfizer mRNA vaccine which has made the company $100 billion. The other point that he makes in a further paper in 2017 is, again, the reason the system continues as it is is most doctors are unaware of the information they receive when they make clinical decisions has been corrupted by commercial influence. The other credible name I will mention is the editor of the Lancet, Richard Horton, who I personally know. In 2015, he wrote an article in the Lancet in relation to a secret meeting that had taken place with himself and some of the world's top medical academics. In that, he wrote that possibly half of the medical published literature may simply be untrue. And he said that science has taken a turn towards darkness. But who's going to take the first step to clean up the system? I believe in this case and in this court today, this is going to be a very pivotal potential moment in history for that first step. ---------------------- Dr Aseem Malhotra H/T: Tiina Keskimäki 🇫🇮
29:17

BOOM!!! 💥💥💥 Dr. Aseem Malhotra's testimony was delivered in the Helsinski District Court on April 12, 2024, with the understanding that any deviation from the truth would constitute perjury. This clip was immediately banned by YouTube so please share widely. I've trimmed the clip, removing the interpreter's segment for a smoother listening experience. Here's the first hour of the testimony. ---------------------------------- My name is Doctor Aseem Malhotra. I am a consultant cardiologist. I've been a qualified doctor since 2001. I have held various roles both in academic health policy. In England, in the United Kingdom, and of the various roles, I won't bore you with all the details. I think three of the most relevant and prominent are the fact that I was an ambassador for the Academy of Medical Royal Colleges for six years, which represented every doctor in the UK. I served a full term of six years as a trustee of the King's fund. I was the youngest member to be appointed to this body which advises government on health policy. I was a founding member of Action on Sugar and a first science director. And through that role I'm considered the lead campaigner on bringing about a sugary drinks tax in the UK. And also, finally I served for five years as visiting professor of evidence based medicine at the Bahiana School of Medicine in Salvador, Brazil. In early 2020, at the beginning of the pandemic I was most vocal doctor on the mainstream, making the link very early on between COVID and those who are vulnerable to suffering serious complications from COVID In fact, in March 2020, I was asked to go on Sky News to explain my initial research findings of the link between especially obesity and COVID, but also to give people an opportunity and to suggest to the government this was a great time for them to implement public health policy to help people enhance or optimise their immune system, which could happen within just a few weeks of dietary changes and optimising vitamin D. This was later also backed up by medical journal publications a few months later. And I was first to mention on the back of an article I published in the Daily Telegraph newspaper, which became a front page commentary and was picked up by BBC News and Good Morning Britain, where I had said that it's likely our prime minister, Boris Johnson, was hospitalised because of his weight. As a result of that, the then secretary for health, Matt Hancock, and this was publicised in the news, had asked me to advise him on the link between COVID and obesity. ...before I explain my journey and in many ways U-turn on my understanding in terms of the benefits and harms of the COVID vaccine, my experience in this area over the last couple of years has made me realise more than ever that even for that the greatest barrier to the truth are not factual or intellectual barriers, but psychological. I think all of us as human beings are vulnerable to these psychological barriers and we should have compassion for ourselves. And I will just very briefly summarise those three psychological barriers before I get into my detailed account of what I was involved in in regards to the COVID vaccine. The first psychological barrier is one of fear. And many of us understandably, and I still remember from early on in the pandemic, we were all scared. We did not know what we were dealing with. The issue with fear is that when people and populations are in a state of fear, we are less likely to engage in critical thinking and we are more likely to be compliant. Although COVID was particularly devastating for vulnerable groups in the elderly and I even have managed and still manage people with long COVID, the fear was grossly exaggerated. And one of the examples of that is that when we had good information on the mortality rate of COVID in the United States, one survey in 2020 revealed that 50% of Americans believed that if they caught COVID, the risk of 19 hospitalisation was 50% one and two, when the actual figure, certainly an average for people in middle age, was less than 1%. The second barrier to the truth, which I think is very relevant to the situation we find ourselves in now, is one called willful blindness. This is when human beings, all of us, are vulnerable to this, turn a blind eye to the truth in order to feel safe, avoid conflict, reduce anxiety and to protect prestige and fragile egos. Some examples of this include, on a personal level, willful blindness can occur when a spouse turns a blind eye to the affair of their partner. On an institutional level, some great examples of willful blindness include Hollywood and Harvey Weinstein, the Catholic Church and child molestation. I believe the current situation we find ourselves in, with much of the mainstream narrative and the medical establishment and policy makers not acknowledging quite horrific, serious and common harms from this vaccine, is another example of willful blindness. And I also say this with full empathy, because I was one of those people that was for a very long time, willfully blind to the harms of the COVID vaccine. In January 2021, I was one of the first people to take two doses of the COVID mRNA vaccine because I volunteered in a vaccine centre. I still believe that traditional vaccines are some of the safest amongst all pharmacological interventions in medicine and I could not conceive of any possibility whatsoever of this vaccine causing harm. As a public figure and respected doctor in the UK, I have built relationships across the board with many other public figures, including celebrities and politicians, who often come to me for medical advice. One of those people was film director Gurinder Chadha, who you may be familiar with some of her work, including the movie "Bend It like Beckham", who had asked me whether or not she should take the vaccine and had sent me blogs which I dismissed and regarded as anti vax nonsense. I was then asked to go on good morning, Britain because Gurinder Chadha, the director herself tweeted that I had convinced her to take the vaccine. The main reason for this TV appearance was to help tackle vaccine hesitancy, which was very prominent amongst people from ethnic minority groups in the UK. I made the point on that programme that I understand where vaccine hesitancy was coming from because of the history that I have been involved with over many years in highlighting the shortcomings of pharmaceutical industry influence over medicine. And I even made the point, if I remember correctly, that they have been found guilty of fraud on many occasions, that the third most common cause of death, prepandemic after heart disease and cancer, is prescribed medications. I, however, reassured the public and said that despite these figures, of everything we do in medicine, traditional vaccinations are amongst the safest. I still believe this to be the case. A few months later, in April 2021, I met with a colleague and friend of mine who I regard as one of the brightest cardiologists in the United Kingdom. I was surprised when he told me that he had not taken the COVID vaccine. He explained to me that he had concerns because he had seen in the supplementary appendix of Pfizer's original trial that there were four cardiac arrests in the vaccine group and only one in the placebo. These numbers were small and did not reach statistical significance. So this could be random chance, or his concern was it could represent a signal of problems in the future. And if this was the case, we are going to have a huge problem. He said he'd rather wait and see what happens before taking the vaccine. On July 26, 2021, my father, aged 73, who was a very prominent, well known doctor in the UK, including being the honorary vice president of the British Medical Association and had received honours from the Queen of England with an OBE, suffered an unexpected sudden cardiac arrest. I was particularly devastated by this happening and I was also I find it difficult to understand why my father, who was a fit and well man, I knew his cardiac history and his cardiac status, would suffer a cardiac arrest. But also my initial investigation was to try and understand why there had been a 30 minutes ambulance delay arriving to his apartment. Two weeks later, the deputy chief nurse of NHS England, a government health body, called me up. She was very upset, she knew my father very well and she was crying and she told me, Aseem, there's something I need to tell you. She in effect told me that throughout the country, for the last two months prior to my father's cardiac arrest in most regions of the UK, ambulances were not getting to patients in time for heart attacks and cardiac arrests. And there had been a deliberate, and I will use these words because I mentioned it, I've mentioned it before, a cover up involving the government and the Department of Health to withhold this information from doctors and the public. I worked with an investigative journalist with the I newspaper in the UK to write an article and a news story that became BBC News headlines a few months later, exposing this. Just before I exposed this, I messaged a professor of cardiology who I trust in the UK. He has a leadership role to explain to him what had happened and what I was about to do. I have text message evidence of this. He told me not to do this because it would make me enemies. I explained to him that I had a duty to patients and the public. I'm highlighting this as one example and I'll give you more examples of a cultural problem within medicine. The next part of this story is the post mortem findings of my father. They did not make any sense to me. I am considered a leading expert, maybe in the world, on the development and progression of coronary artery disease. My father had two severe blockages in his coronary arteries. There was no actual evidence of heart attack and likely there was a rhythm disturbance because of reduced blood supply that led to his cardiac arrest. Then in, within the space of a few weeks, around October and November, 3, different sources of information was brought to my attention that made me realise that there was probably a significant problem with the COVID mRNA vaccine. The first in October 2021. I remember I was giving lectures in Stockholm. I was contacted by a journalist with a Times newspaper who reported to me and said, Dr Malhotra, we have reports of an unexplained 25% increase in heart attacks in hospitals in Scotland and asked me what I thought was going on. I explained to her that at that time, with the evidence I knew in my own experience, I said that two likely contributory factors were lockdown stress. We know that when populations undergo severe stress after war, for example, there is an increase in heart attacks and strokes that can last for many years. She asked me whether I thought that there was a contribution. I was surprised when she asked me whether I thought there may be a contribution of the COVID vaccine to these heart attacks. I said to her, a good scientist should never exclude any possibility. But I felt at the time it was unlikely to be related to the COVID vaccine. But we should watch this space and keep our eyes open. A few weeks later, a publication appeared in the Journal Circulation, which is considered the highest impact cardiology journal in the United States that revealed a potentially very strong link between the COVID mRNA vaccines and acceleration in heart attack risk. Very specifically, in several hundred people of middle age, there was a plausible mechanism, by use of inflammatory markers in the blood, that increased the baseline risk of those people having a heart attack in five years, from 11% to 25%, just within two months of having the COVID mRNA vaccines. Of course, this is one bit of data, but even if partially true, that is a huge increase in risk in a very short space of time. And for me now made me think and link back to why my father may have suffered a cardiac arrest six months after having two doses of the vaccine. I remember thinking and speaking to a colleague, that if this was true, then we were going to see an increase in cardiac arrests, heart attacks and excess deaths in heavily vaccinated countries for the next few years. Then within a few weeks, I was called up by a whistleblower at a very prestigious british institution. I will name that institution, which I have not done publicly before as a University of Oxford. This cardiologist explained to me that a group of researchers in his department had accidentally found, through the use of very specialised imaging of the heart, that there was a signal of increased inflammation of the heart arteries, which was there in the vaccinated, but not there in the unvaccinated. The lead researcher of that group had sat down, the juniors, and had said that we are not going to explore these findings any further because it may affect our funding from the pharmaceutical industry. At that point, with these three bits of information, I then felt it was my ethical duty to speak out. And I went on GBNews to talk about what I'd found what I'd heard and I'd asked for the Vaccine Committee of the UK on TV to investigate this, to see whether there was a real problem with the vaccine in relation to heart issues. Around the same time which I found very strange is that the Secretary of State for Health at that stage, who was not Matt Hancock, was Sajid Javid, had announced in parliament that we are going to introduce legislation to ensure that all healthcare workers are mandated to have the COVID vaccine. For me, this, by that stage had no ethical or scientific justification, because certainly after the summer of 2021, it had become very apparent that the COVID mRNA vaccine was not stopping infection and it certainly was not stopping transmission. It was understood that approximately 80,000 NHS workers had refused at this stage to have the COVID vaccine. And now they were threatened with losing their job if by April the following year they had not been fully vaccinated. Many of these people were very concerned and contacted me around that time, I was also conducting many interviews, both through the BBC and Sky News and GBNews in regards to what happened with my father's ambulance delay. And I used it as an opportunity on the mainstream media to call for Sajid Javid, the secretary for health, to U-turn on the introduction of a mandate for healthcare workers based upon the fact that I felt it was not scientific and it was unethical. I also received my own personal backlash from these comments where I was contacted by the Royal College of Physicians who I had an affiliation with, and they asked me to respond to anonymous complaints from doctors that I was spreading, in quotes, antivax disinformation. I felt with my own knowledge and experience of the healthcare system that this was a direct response probably fueled by a combination of willful blindness and institutional corruption. To elaborate a bit further, when I say institutional corruption, I mean that my view was that the complaints were likely being fueled by academics with financial ties to the pharmaceutical industry. I felt very concerned about the potential introduction of the vaccine, well, the vaccine mandate. And therefore I decided there were two things that I decided to do. The first was I made a phone call to the chairman of the British Medical Association in December 2021. I had a good relationship with him and he respected my opinion. And I spent 2 hours on the phone explaining to him everything that I knew up to that stage about my concerns of the COVID mRNA vaccine. He said to me, "Aseem, nobody appears to critically appraise the evidence on the COVID mRNA vaccine as well as you have from our conversation, he said, most of my colleagues are getting their information on the benefits and harms of the vaccine from the BBC". This was replicated by the former chair of the CDC in the United States, Rochelle Walensky, who in an interview later on had said that her initial optimism of the vaccine benefits came from CNN News report. I say this just to emphasise that we should all accept our vulnerabilities to where we receive health information. Even doctors, policymakers, judges and lawyers are all influenced on the public massively by mainstream media. The chairman of the BMA also agreed with me. There was no ethical or scientific justification for mandating the COVID vaccine. He said the BMA also did not support it. And he said because of my conversation with him, he would speak directly to the secretary for health, Sajid Javid. One month later, at the end of January 2022, the COVID vaccine mandate for healthcare workers was overturned. I at that stage, given the fact that there was some backlash happening towards me, I realised that because this is a very big issue and area, and not my initial area of expertise, I needed to carry out my own critical analysis of the COVID mRNA vaccines. I spent six to nine months critically appraising the data, including speaking to two Pfizer whistleblowers, three investigative medical journalists and eminent scientists from the University of Oxford, Stanford and Harvard. The most critical bit, the most critical research that was published on this issue, which I think the whole court should acknowledge in August 2022, was published in the journal Vaccine. That research was conducted by some of the world's top independent of drug industry influence academics. That research, we was able to reanalyze the original randomised control trials conducted by Pfizer and Moderna. They were able to do this because new information was made available on the FDA's website and Health Canada's website. The conclusions of that paper were really very disturbing. The original trials that led to the drug regulatory approval of these vaccines revealed that you were more likely to suffer serious harm from taking the vaccine, specifically hospitalisation, life changing event or disability, than you were to be hospitalised with COVID That rate of harm at two months was very high at 1 in 800. Just to give you some perspective, historically we have suspended other vaccines for much less. In 1976, the swine flu vaccine was pulled because it was found to cause a neurological syndrome called Guillain-Barre syndrome In one in 100,000 people. In 1999, the rotavirus vaccine was suspended because it was found to cause a form of bowel obstruction in children affecting 1 in 10,000. This was 1 in 800. In my view, it was very clear that given this information, published in the highest impact Vaccine journal in the world, peer reviewed, and has not had any significant rebuttals, that this vaccine now, in my view, should never have been approved for use in a single human being in the first place. In my view, this very important court case in some ways, actually is a distraction from the much bigger issue, which is there should be court cases around the world with a full inquiry into the pharmaceutical industry and an inquiry as to how we got this so very wrong. Of course, one could argue this is just one bit of research, but actually, unfortunately, there are different, many different strands of research that are showing a signal of considerable and common serious harm from these vaccines. From pharmacovigilance data that is reporting what we call yellow card reports from the public. We have plausible biological mechanism of harm. We have other research called observational data. We have autopsy data also confirming that certainly with the majority of people who died within a short space of time of having the vaccine in relation to the heart, was definitively caused by the vaccine. This is really a very, very, very horrific situation we find ourselves in. One would hope and expect that the regulators should be independently evaluating all medications. But of course, the evidence reveals this is far from true. There was an investigation by the BMJ, also published in the summer of 2022, which revealed that most of the major regulators across the world were taking most of their money from the drug industry. For example, the MHRA in the UK receives 86% of its funding from the drug industry, and the FDA in America receives 65% of its funding from the drug industry, A fact that most doctors do not know. And therefore, I would not expect members of the court to know this either, is that very, very rarely do drug industry sponsored research get independently evaluated. Clinical trial data can often involve thousands of pages of information on individual patients. The drug companies hold onto that raw data. They then give summary results to the regulator, who are then paying, who have an incentive to approve the drugs, and the drugs are then approved. I made these points in my peer reviewed article published in the Journal of Insulin Resistance in September 2022, where I concluded that we should pause and investigate the issue around the COVID mRNA vaccines. I have since then been campaigning and advocating for a return to ethical evidence based medical practise around the world. Some of the clear solutions moving forward would be changes in the law that are required so that patients, doctors, members of the public can have greater confidence in the information they receive to make decisions about their health. Two very clear, low hanging fruit solutions, which are both ethical, scientific and democratic, would be that the drug industry should be allowed to develop drugs, but they shouldn't be allowed to test them themselves. And they certainly shouldn't be allowed to design their own research to and hold onto the raw data. Their information needs to be independently evaluated. One other clear solution would also be that the medical regulators, again, should not be taking any money from the industry, as this is a gross conflict of interest. I also want to highlight for people to understand the bigger picture. Prior to the pandemic, I had realised that there was a big problem with the reliability of clinical research, where invariably the results of clinical trials on all drugs sponsored by the drug industry, grossly exaggerate their safety and benefits. I have taken this information to the European Parliament, where I spoke in 2019, and I spoke to very senior politicians in the UK government. But although they were sympathetic, they felt that the issue was much bigger than them as individuals, and therefore it also needed media attention to get public awareness on the importance of such an inquiry. Before we continue with further questions, as I've been speaking for quite a long time now I'll just finish with two references just for the court and the judges to understand just how bad this problem is. Prepandemic the man who I call the Stephen Hawking of medicine is Professor John Ioannidis from the University of Stanford. The reason I call him the Stephen Hawking of Medicine is he's the most cited medical researcher in the world and is a mathematical genius. In 2006, he published a paper which was entitled why most published research findings are false. In that paper, he makes a point that the greater the financial interests in a given field, the less likely the research findings are to be true. I say this in context of the Pfizer mRNA vaccine which has made the company $100 billion. The other point that he makes in a further paper in 2017 is, again, the reason the system continues as it is is most doctors are unaware of the information they receive when they make clinical decisions has been corrupted by commercial influence. The other credible name I will mention is the editor of the Lancet, Richard Horton, who I personally know. In 2015, he wrote an article in the Lancet in relation to a secret meeting that had taken place with himself and some of the world's top medical academics. In that, he wrote that possibly half of the medical published literature may simply be untrue. And he said that science has taken a turn towards darkness. But who's going to take the first step to clean up the system? I believe in this case and in this court today, this is going to be a very pivotal potential moment in history for that first step. ---------------------- Dr Aseem Malhotra H/T: Tiina Keskimäki 🇫🇮

aussie17

799,326 views • 2 years ago

Why is it, that everywhere I go, it is White politicians that want to help hide the industrial scale gang rape of working class White girls? There is no Muslim bloc vote in Barrow. So why? My thoughts on what I witnessed last night in Barrow. _________ Secrecy and Shame in Barrow: Labour Councillors Vote to Block Gang Rape Inquiry While Instructing Survivors to Shut Up and Stay Silent In Barrow Town Hall, survivors of grooming gangs were instructed to shut up and sit in silence as Labour Councillors voted to help cover up the gang rape of the town's children. When a motion to include Barrow in the national inquiry came before the council, Labour councillors blocked it while Mayor Fred Chatfield tried to unlawfully stop the cameras from recording what was happening. When the team of three newly elected Reform councillors demanded a recorded vote so the public could see who stood where on this critical issue, Labour voted to prevent it, ensuring their names would be hidden from the record. A Simple Motion for Truth The motion, tabled by Reform UK councillor Sienna Churcher, was straightforward in its ask. It welcomed the National Inquiry announced in June 2025 and requested that Barrow Borough Council write to the Home Secretary, formally asking for the town to be included amongst those examined for historic and ongoing grooming gang activity. The motion recognised the courage of whistleblowers and survivors, called for transparency in all correspondence, and demanded public accountability. For survivors in Barrow who have lived with the knowledge that their town has been scarred by organised rape gangs just like Rotherham, Rochdale, Oldham, and Telford, this represented hope for official recognition of their suffering. Especially as, In February this year, that suffering was finally acknowledged in court when the truth was laid bare. The Takeaway That Became a Trafficking Hub Three brothers, Nasir, Naser, and Nabeel Miah, were convicted of horrific child sexual offences committed in Barrow and Leeds between 2008 and 2016. They targeted teenage girls, many as young as 14, who were groomed, abused, and traded like commodities in what the Crown Prosecution Service described as systematic sexual exploitation. The brothers had moved to Barrow to work in a family-owned takeaway that became, in Judge Unsworth's words, a "hub of criminality." Girls, some still in school uniforms, were picked up in cars, taken upstairs, plied with alcohol and drugs, and assaulted on what the court heard described as "scabby beds." Judge Unsworth, sentencing the men to a combined 70 years in prison, delivered words that should have resonated through every corner of Barrow's political establishment. "In Barrow, the brothers were not acting in the shadows but acting in plain sight. Each of the victims was vulnerable, and the brothers were confident that if the girls blew the whistle, they would not be believed." Instead of heeding that judicial warning about institutional blindness, Labour councillors chose to repeat the same pattern of denial that enabled the abuse in the first place. Because what Judge Unsworth's court had established was far worse than isolated incidents. A rape gang had been operating in Barrow. Men were coming to Barrow specifically to rape children. Children from Barrow were being trafficked to other towns and cities to be raped. The takeaway wasn't just a business but the centre of a trafficking network that moved vulnerable girls across county lines for sexual exploitation. The court heard how the Miah brothers had treated teenage girls as commodities, passing them between abusers and transporting them to Leeds. The Miah brothers didn't act in the shadows but acted in plain sight while local institutions looked the other way. Last night, those same institutions did it again. The Wrecking Amendment Labour's response to the original motion was to gut it entirely. Councillor Andy Coles proposed an amendment, seconded by William McEwan, that removed the specific call to write to the Home Secretary and replaced it with procedural camouflage about "allowing the independent commission and survivors to get on with the inquiry." Reform Councillor Colin Rudd called it exactly what it was. "This amendment adds no value. It undermines the motion. It sabotages the motion. This is a wrecking amendment." The councillor was correct. This was sabotage dressed up as sensitivity, taking a concrete act of solidarity and replacing it with the empty comfort of hoping someone else would act. The victims of the Miah brothers deserved action, not hope. The Mayor Who Tried to Stop the Cameras As the debate intensified, and Cllr Rudd quoted Judge Unsworth's words about acting "in plain sight" as a warning about institutional complacency., Mayor Fred Chatfield intervened to stop filming. "It's a public meeting," came the reply. "You've never asked permission to film," the Mayor snapped back. The exchange summed up everything wrong with how power operates in Barrow. When confronted with truth, the instinct wasn't reflection but control. Yet what Mayor Chatfield attempted wasn't just politically damaging but illegal. Under The Openness of Local Government Bodies Regulations 2014, introduced through the Localism Act 2011, members of the public and press have a statutory right to film, record, and report on all public council meetings. The legislation is unambiguous. "Council meetings are public meetings. The press and public have a right to attend, and to film, record, blog, or tweet during those meetings." No permission is required. No consent is necessary. The only exception would be if filming genuinely disrupted proceedings through shouting or obstruction, none of which occurred. Mayor Chatfield's instruction that filming required his permission violated both the letter and spirit of the Localism Act, which was designed to ensure democratic transparency. The Mayor should now resign for his actions. By attempting to silence the cameras, Mayor Chatfield didn't just betray the survivors watching from the gallery but broke the law designed to protect their right to witness democracy in action. The Vote They Didn't Want You to See When the Reform councillors called for a recorded vote so the public could know who supported Labour's amendment and who opposed it, Labour again chose secrecy. Under standing orders, a recorded vote requires majority support. Labour used this procedural rule to block transparency, ensuring their names would not appear in the public record. "So the councillors who stopped the inquiry can hide who they are," muttered one member of the public. "Disgraceful." "Shame on you." The chamber doors were closed for the final vote. The Survivors Watching Among those in the public gallery were women who had lived through the horrors being discussed. Some had waited years for recognition. Others still live in the same town where their abusers walked free. They listened as councillors downplayed the motion, softened the language, and eventually killed it entirely. Councillor Colin Rudd spoke directly to the chamber's shame. "Every person in every office, in every department, in every institution in this town failed these girls... and you're doing it again." His words carried the weight of judicial truth, but they didn't move the majority. The vote carried, the motion died, and the survivors left that hall knowing nothing had changed. The Labour Playbook of Denial What happened in Barrow follows the same playbook used across Britain's Labour strongholds when grooming gang scandals surface. Whether it's Oldham, Rotherham, or Telford, the institutional response never varies. Resist external scrutiny, prefer internal reviews that can be controlled, deploy procedural manoeuvring to protect the institution over the victims. The formula never varies. Protect reputations over truth, deploy bureaucratic language to avoid concrete action, and when challenged, retreat behind phrases like "independent commissions" as though process can substitute for courage. The questions are obvious. If everyone truly wants accountability, why block a letter to the Home Secretary? Why stop the filming? Why refuse a recorded vote? Because they understand that public accountability requires public records, and public records create public consequences. The Continuing Cover-Up Last night's meeting exposed the mechanism by which grooming gang scandals are managed across Britain's local authorities. This wasn't incompetence or confusion but a deliberate strategy deployed with surgical precision. Here's how it works. Acknowledge the problem exists but only after court proceedings make denial impossible. Express concern and sympathy while blocking any external examination that might reveal institutional culpability. Deploy procedural manoeuvring to prevent public accountability by killing recorded votes, stopping filming, and sanitising minutes. The pattern is so consistent it might as well be written in a manual. Oldham Council used identical tactics when faced with demands for transparency over Operation Augusta. Rotherham's political leadership employed the same playbook during the Casey Review fallout. The strategy works because it allows politicians to appear concerned while ensuring nothing changes. But Barrow's case reveals something more disturbing. The Miah brothers operated their trafficking network from 2008 to 2016, eight years of systematic abuse while local institutions looked the other way. Children were being transported across county lines for rape while Barrow Council carried on with business as usual. When survivors finally saw their abusers jailed, they might have hoped for institutional recognition and reform. Instead, they got Andy Coles and William McEwan drafting amendments to avoid external scrutiny. They got Fred Chatfield trying to silence cameras. They got Labour councillors voting to hide their names from public records. This goes beyond political embarrassment. It's institutional betrayal that mirrors the same complacency that enabled the Miah brothers to operate with impunity. The children who were trafficked from that Barrow takeaway deserved better then. The survivors watching from the gallery deserved better last night. It is now up to the people of Barrow to decide if they want better politicians representing them. _________ This isn't about politics anymore. It's about preservation of a ruling clique defending its own survival, even if it means abandoning the very people they swore to protect. The nation does not need silence. It needs truth. This is not only a child abuse scandal. It is a crisis of truth, trust and governance in modern Britain. I am Raja Miah. For seven years, I led a small team that exposed how politicians protected the rape gangs. I cannot do this on my own. I need you to stand with me and help make sure the National Inquiry we have all fought for is not a whitewash. We’re running out of time. Without the numbers, they will win. It’s as simple as that. 🔴 Subscribe to my newsletter – it’s free. Or support the work for just 75p a week (£3/month or £30/year). Whatever you do, please subscribe; 👉 This is the fight. This is the moment. There will not be another 🔴 Prefer a one-off contribution? 👉 👉 No corporate sponsors. No party machine. Just you and thousands of ordinary people who know what’s at stake. We’ve come this far. Help finish it. Raja Miah MBE
12:04

Why is it, that everywhere I go, it is White politicians that want to help hide the industrial scale gang rape of working class White girls? There is no Muslim bloc vote in Barrow. So why? My thoughts on what I witnessed last night in Barrow. _________ Secrecy and Shame in Barrow: Labour Councillors Vote to Block Gang Rape Inquiry While Instructing Survivors to Shut Up and Stay Silent In Barrow Town Hall, survivors of grooming gangs were instructed to shut up and sit in silence as Labour Councillors voted to help cover up the gang rape of the town's children. When a motion to include Barrow in the national inquiry came before the council, Labour councillors blocked it while Mayor Fred Chatfield tried to unlawfully stop the cameras from recording what was happening. When the team of three newly elected Reform councillors demanded a recorded vote so the public could see who stood where on this critical issue, Labour voted to prevent it, ensuring their names would be hidden from the record. A Simple Motion for Truth The motion, tabled by Reform UK councillor Sienna Churcher, was straightforward in its ask. It welcomed the National Inquiry announced in June 2025 and requested that Barrow Borough Council write to the Home Secretary, formally asking for the town to be included amongst those examined for historic and ongoing grooming gang activity. The motion recognised the courage of whistleblowers and survivors, called for transparency in all correspondence, and demanded public accountability. For survivors in Barrow who have lived with the knowledge that their town has been scarred by organised rape gangs just like Rotherham, Rochdale, Oldham, and Telford, this represented hope for official recognition of their suffering. Especially as, In February this year, that suffering was finally acknowledged in court when the truth was laid bare. The Takeaway That Became a Trafficking Hub Three brothers, Nasir, Naser, and Nabeel Miah, were convicted of horrific child sexual offences committed in Barrow and Leeds between 2008 and 2016. They targeted teenage girls, many as young as 14, who were groomed, abused, and traded like commodities in what the Crown Prosecution Service described as systematic sexual exploitation. The brothers had moved to Barrow to work in a family-owned takeaway that became, in Judge Unsworth's words, a "hub of criminality." Girls, some still in school uniforms, were picked up in cars, taken upstairs, plied with alcohol and drugs, and assaulted on what the court heard described as "scabby beds." Judge Unsworth, sentencing the men to a combined 70 years in prison, delivered words that should have resonated through every corner of Barrow's political establishment. "In Barrow, the brothers were not acting in the shadows but acting in plain sight. Each of the victims was vulnerable, and the brothers were confident that if the girls blew the whistle, they would not be believed." Instead of heeding that judicial warning about institutional blindness, Labour councillors chose to repeat the same pattern of denial that enabled the abuse in the first place. Because what Judge Unsworth's court had established was far worse than isolated incidents. A rape gang had been operating in Barrow. Men were coming to Barrow specifically to rape children. Children from Barrow were being trafficked to other towns and cities to be raped. The takeaway wasn't just a business but the centre of a trafficking network that moved vulnerable girls across county lines for sexual exploitation. The court heard how the Miah brothers had treated teenage girls as commodities, passing them between abusers and transporting them to Leeds. The Miah brothers didn't act in the shadows but acted in plain sight while local institutions looked the other way. Last night, those same institutions did it again. The Wrecking Amendment Labour's response to the original motion was to gut it entirely. Councillor Andy Coles proposed an amendment, seconded by William McEwan, that removed the specific call to write to the Home Secretary and replaced it with procedural camouflage about "allowing the independent commission and survivors to get on with the inquiry." Reform Councillor Colin Rudd called it exactly what it was. "This amendment adds no value. It undermines the motion. It sabotages the motion. This is a wrecking amendment." The councillor was correct. This was sabotage dressed up as sensitivity, taking a concrete act of solidarity and replacing it with the empty comfort of hoping someone else would act. The victims of the Miah brothers deserved action, not hope. The Mayor Who Tried to Stop the Cameras As the debate intensified, and Cllr Rudd quoted Judge Unsworth's words about acting "in plain sight" as a warning about institutional complacency., Mayor Fred Chatfield intervened to stop filming. "It's a public meeting," came the reply. "You've never asked permission to film," the Mayor snapped back. The exchange summed up everything wrong with how power operates in Barrow. When confronted with truth, the instinct wasn't reflection but control. Yet what Mayor Chatfield attempted wasn't just politically damaging but illegal. Under The Openness of Local Government Bodies Regulations 2014, introduced through the Localism Act 2011, members of the public and press have a statutory right to film, record, and report on all public council meetings. The legislation is unambiguous. "Council meetings are public meetings. The press and public have a right to attend, and to film, record, blog, or tweet during those meetings." No permission is required. No consent is necessary. The only exception would be if filming genuinely disrupted proceedings through shouting or obstruction, none of which occurred. Mayor Chatfield's instruction that filming required his permission violated both the letter and spirit of the Localism Act, which was designed to ensure democratic transparency. The Mayor should now resign for his actions. By attempting to silence the cameras, Mayor Chatfield didn't just betray the survivors watching from the gallery but broke the law designed to protect their right to witness democracy in action. The Vote They Didn't Want You to See When the Reform councillors called for a recorded vote so the public could know who supported Labour's amendment and who opposed it, Labour again chose secrecy. Under standing orders, a recorded vote requires majority support. Labour used this procedural rule to block transparency, ensuring their names would not appear in the public record. "So the councillors who stopped the inquiry can hide who they are," muttered one member of the public. "Disgraceful." "Shame on you." The chamber doors were closed for the final vote. The Survivors Watching Among those in the public gallery were women who had lived through the horrors being discussed. Some had waited years for recognition. Others still live in the same town where their abusers walked free. They listened as councillors downplayed the motion, softened the language, and eventually killed it entirely. Councillor Colin Rudd spoke directly to the chamber's shame. "Every person in every office, in every department, in every institution in this town failed these girls... and you're doing it again." His words carried the weight of judicial truth, but they didn't move the majority. The vote carried, the motion died, and the survivors left that hall knowing nothing had changed. The Labour Playbook of Denial What happened in Barrow follows the same playbook used across Britain's Labour strongholds when grooming gang scandals surface. Whether it's Oldham, Rotherham, or Telford, the institutional response never varies. Resist external scrutiny, prefer internal reviews that can be controlled, deploy procedural manoeuvring to protect the institution over the victims. The formula never varies. Protect reputations over truth, deploy bureaucratic language to avoid concrete action, and when challenged, retreat behind phrases like "independent commissions" as though process can substitute for courage. The questions are obvious. If everyone truly wants accountability, why block a letter to the Home Secretary? Why stop the filming? Why refuse a recorded vote? Because they understand that public accountability requires public records, and public records create public consequences. The Continuing Cover-Up Last night's meeting exposed the mechanism by which grooming gang scandals are managed across Britain's local authorities. This wasn't incompetence or confusion but a deliberate strategy deployed with surgical precision. Here's how it works. Acknowledge the problem exists but only after court proceedings make denial impossible. Express concern and sympathy while blocking any external examination that might reveal institutional culpability. Deploy procedural manoeuvring to prevent public accountability by killing recorded votes, stopping filming, and sanitising minutes. The pattern is so consistent it might as well be written in a manual. Oldham Council used identical tactics when faced with demands for transparency over Operation Augusta. Rotherham's political leadership employed the same playbook during the Casey Review fallout. The strategy works because it allows politicians to appear concerned while ensuring nothing changes. But Barrow's case reveals something more disturbing. The Miah brothers operated their trafficking network from 2008 to 2016, eight years of systematic abuse while local institutions looked the other way. Children were being transported across county lines for rape while Barrow Council carried on with business as usual. When survivors finally saw their abusers jailed, they might have hoped for institutional recognition and reform. Instead, they got Andy Coles and William McEwan drafting amendments to avoid external scrutiny. They got Fred Chatfield trying to silence cameras. They got Labour councillors voting to hide their names from public records. This goes beyond political embarrassment. It's institutional betrayal that mirrors the same complacency that enabled the Miah brothers to operate with impunity. The children who were trafficked from that Barrow takeaway deserved better then. The survivors watching from the gallery deserved better last night. It is now up to the people of Barrow to decide if they want better politicians representing them. _________ This isn't about politics anymore. It's about preservation of a ruling clique defending its own survival, even if it means abandoning the very people they swore to protect. The nation does not need silence. It needs truth. This is not only a child abuse scandal. It is a crisis of truth, trust and governance in modern Britain. I am Raja Miah. For seven years, I led a small team that exposed how politicians protected the rape gangs. I cannot do this on my own. I need you to stand with me and help make sure the National Inquiry we have all fought for is not a whitewash. We’re running out of time. Without the numbers, they will win. It’s as simple as that. 🔴 Subscribe to my newsletter – it’s free. Or support the work for just 75p a week (£3/month or £30/year). Whatever you do, please subscribe; 👉 This is the fight. This is the moment. There will not be another 🔴 Prefer a one-off contribution? 👉 👉 No corporate sponsors. No party machine. Just you and thousands of ordinary people who know what’s at stake. We’ve come this far. Help finish it. Raja Miah MBE

Raja Miah

105,503 views • 10 months ago

Here’s my written & video review of the new 2026 Tesla Model Y Performance after driving it for a week. This is the best-value new Tesla you can buy. Crazy performance, no real drawbacks, and all for just $57,490. Let’s dive in. Price: I haven’t seen many others mention this: every option on the Model Y Performance is included at no extra cost in the US (except FSD). So if you spec a Model Y Premium AWD with an upgraded paint color, tow package, white interior, and upgraded 20" wheels, a fully loaded Model Y Premium AWD ends up only about $2,500 less expensive than a fully loaded Model Y Performance. Ride Quality: I thought I might feel worse ride quality vs my Premium AWD Model Y with 20" wheels, but I struggled to find any real difference, despite the larger 21" wheels, firmer suspension setting, and 0.6" lower ride height on the Performance trim. A true testament to Tesla's engineering magic on this thing. Exterior Design: Unlike the previous Model Y Performance, Tesla made some exterior design tweaks with a new front and rear fascia to spice things up a bit. The result, in my opinion, is the best-looking Model Y trim you can buy. It definitely has a more aggressive presence in person, even if it's subtle. The carbon-fiber spoiler boosts high-speed stability and cuts aerodynamic drag by 10%. The new 21’’ Arachnid 2.0 wheels look fantastic in person, one of my favorite designs ever from Tesla. Staggered wheel and tire fitment provides better grip and steering. The beefier 275mm rear tires (255mm in the front) give the vehicle a better stance from behind. Vehicle-to-Load (V2L): For the first time on a Model Y in North America, you can now plug in anything you want to the exterior charge port with an adapter, even a campsite! It provides up to 2.4 kW of power (120V at 20A) from two household outlets. It's a great feature. Interior: It’s what you know and love, but with a few changes that elevate the ownership experience. New with the Performance is a larger 16" center screen (vs. 15.4" on non-Performance models), with thinner bezels and higher resolution. It’s not a huge difference on paper, but you definitely notice it in daily use. The carbon-fiber décor on the door cards and dash is a nice touch, though I would like to see it extended to the center console. The new performance seats are the best seats of any Tesla I've ever experienced. While they retain aggressive bolstering in the torso area, the bottom seat cushion has less aggressive bolstering than on the Model 3 Performance seats, making it easier to get in and out. It also doesn’t squeeze your thighs too tightly. The powered thigh extenders add comfort on longer drives, especially for taller people who want extra support. And of course, they’re heated and ventilated. The headrests also feel more comfortable than the ones in my Model Y. I want these seats. Unlike the old Model Y Performance, the new one has no Track Mode. Why? Because nobody used it lol. No point in putting engineering resources into something people won’t use. The refreshed Model 3 Performance still has it, though. Cabin Quietness: Despite the thinner-profile tires, there is no noticeable difference vs my Premium Model Y. Decibel reading results at highway speeds were visually the same compared to my 2026 Model Y Premium (65-66). Driving Impressions: It’s amazing. Sharp, precise, and agile. The vehicle feels stable at all times. Acceleration is blistering (3.3s 0–60 mph), with plenty of punch even at higher speeds. The tires offer good grip, and cornering is fantastic for an SUV. The suspension setup is great. More steering wheel feedback would be nice, though. Cruising around traffic is a joy. The brakes are much improved over the previous Model Y Performance and are far better suited for spirited driving. There are three acceleration modes: Chill, Standard, and Insane. Just stay in Insane. You’d be insane not to lol. The car also lets you switch between two ride and handling modes: Standard and Sport. The difference isn’t huge, but Standard is better if you’ve got passengers. FSD: I unfortunately wasn’t able to get FSD V14 on this car. It had V13.2.9, so I didn’t use it much. But in the little time I did, it was smooth and comfortable. It didn’t bother me because V14 will perform just as well here as it does on my 2026 Model Y Premium AWD. Conclusion: You won’t find another new SUV today that offers this level of performance for the price. Back in 2022, when Tesla couldn’t build Model Ys fast enough, a fully loaded Model Y Performance cost over $90,440. Today, the refreshed and far more capable 2026 Model Y Performance is just $57,490 fully loaded, and you can simply subscribe to FSD for $99/month. The 2026 Model Y Performance delivers utility, great performance, comfort, tech, self-driving and everything else people love about the Model Y. It’s a no-brainer purchase. I want one badly, but I'll need to show restraint, as I’m saving up for a house lol.
15:48

Here’s my written & video review of the new 2026 Tesla Model Y Performance after driving it for a week. This is the best-value new Tesla you can buy. Crazy performance, no real drawbacks, and all for just $57,490. Let’s dive in. Price: I haven’t seen many others mention this: every option on the Model Y Performance is included at no extra cost in the US (except FSD). So if you spec a Model Y Premium AWD with an upgraded paint color, tow package, white interior, and upgraded 20" wheels, a fully loaded Model Y Premium AWD ends up only about $2,500 less expensive than a fully loaded Model Y Performance. Ride Quality: I thought I might feel worse ride quality vs my Premium AWD Model Y with 20" wheels, but I struggled to find any real difference, despite the larger 21" wheels, firmer suspension setting, and 0.6" lower ride height on the Performance trim. A true testament to Tesla's engineering magic on this thing. Exterior Design: Unlike the previous Model Y Performance, Tesla made some exterior design tweaks with a new front and rear fascia to spice things up a bit. The result, in my opinion, is the best-looking Model Y trim you can buy. It definitely has a more aggressive presence in person, even if it's subtle. The carbon-fiber spoiler boosts high-speed stability and cuts aerodynamic drag by 10%. The new 21’’ Arachnid 2.0 wheels look fantastic in person, one of my favorite designs ever from Tesla. Staggered wheel and tire fitment provides better grip and steering. The beefier 275mm rear tires (255mm in the front) give the vehicle a better stance from behind. Vehicle-to-Load (V2L): For the first time on a Model Y in North America, you can now plug in anything you want to the exterior charge port with an adapter, even a campsite! It provides up to 2.4 kW of power (120V at 20A) from two household outlets. It's a great feature. Interior: It’s what you know and love, but with a few changes that elevate the ownership experience. New with the Performance is a larger 16" center screen (vs. 15.4" on non-Performance models), with thinner bezels and higher resolution. It’s not a huge difference on paper, but you definitely notice it in daily use. The carbon-fiber décor on the door cards and dash is a nice touch, though I would like to see it extended to the center console. The new performance seats are the best seats of any Tesla I've ever experienced. While they retain aggressive bolstering in the torso area, the bottom seat cushion has less aggressive bolstering than on the Model 3 Performance seats, making it easier to get in and out. It also doesn’t squeeze your thighs too tightly. The powered thigh extenders add comfort on longer drives, especially for taller people who want extra support. And of course, they’re heated and ventilated. The headrests also feel more comfortable than the ones in my Model Y. I want these seats. Unlike the old Model Y Performance, the new one has no Track Mode. Why? Because nobody used it lol. No point in putting engineering resources into something people won’t use. The refreshed Model 3 Performance still has it, though. Cabin Quietness: Despite the thinner-profile tires, there is no noticeable difference vs my Premium Model Y. Decibel reading results at highway speeds were visually the same compared to my 2026 Model Y Premium (65-66). Driving Impressions: It’s amazing. Sharp, precise, and agile. The vehicle feels stable at all times. Acceleration is blistering (3.3s 0–60 mph), with plenty of punch even at higher speeds. The tires offer good grip, and cornering is fantastic for an SUV. The suspension setup is great. More steering wheel feedback would be nice, though. Cruising around traffic is a joy. The brakes are much improved over the previous Model Y Performance and are far better suited for spirited driving. There are three acceleration modes: Chill, Standard, and Insane. Just stay in Insane. You’d be insane not to lol. The car also lets you switch between two ride and handling modes: Standard and Sport. The difference isn’t huge, but Standard is better if you’ve got passengers. FSD: I unfortunately wasn’t able to get FSD V14 on this car. It had V13.2.9, so I didn’t use it much. But in the little time I did, it was smooth and comfortable. It didn’t bother me because V14 will perform just as well here as it does on my 2026 Model Y Premium AWD. Conclusion: You won’t find another new SUV today that offers this level of performance for the price. Back in 2022, when Tesla couldn’t build Model Ys fast enough, a fully loaded Model Y Performance cost over $90,440. Today, the refreshed and far more capable 2026 Model Y Performance is just $57,490 fully loaded, and you can simply subscribe to FSD for $99/month. The 2026 Model Y Performance delivers utility, great performance, comfort, tech, self-driving and everything else people love about the Model Y. It’s a no-brainer purchase. I want one badly, but I'll need to show restraint, as I’m saving up for a house lol.

Sawyer Merritt

225,461 views • 9 months ago

There's a sound animals make when they've stopped hoping and started begging. Most people go their entire lives without ever hearing it. The men on that boat heard it at 6:40 in the morning, on water so still it looked like glass, in the kind of silence where you can hear your own heartbeat over the hum of the trolling motor. And then something in that silence moved. Not a fish. Not a bird. Something that had no business being where it was, doing what it was doing, for as long as it had clearly been doing it. I've watched this clip eleven times now and I still get the same reaction on the eleventh watch that I got on the first: a full-body flinch, followed by a slow, sinking realization of exactly what I'm looking at. That's rare. Most viral clips lose their power after the second viewing. This one doesn't. If anything it gets worse, because the more times you watch it, the more your brain starts doing the math on the timeline — how long, how far, how close it came to not ending the way it did. I'm not going to tell you what happens. I'm not going to describe the moment, because the moment is the entire point, and describing it would be like handing you a photograph of a sunset and calling it a vacation. You have to be there. You have to watch the water yourself and see it the way the man in the boat saw it — a fraction of a second before his brain even processed what his eyes were sending it. What I will tell you is this: there is a very specific kind of video that breaks the internet not because it's dramatic, not because it's violent, not because it's shocking in the traditional sense, but because it touches something older than language. Something underneath the part of your brain that scrolls. This is one of those videos. It hits the part of you that still remembers being small and scared and needing someone bigger to notice you. Every single person who has ever felt helpless, ever felt like they were fighting something too big for them alone, ever needed a hand reaching down when they had nothing left to reach back with — that person is going to feel this clip in their chest before their mind even catches up. Here's the part nobody talks about when they share this kind of footage: the decision-making window was almost nonexistent. There was no time to think, no time to debate, no time to weigh pros and cons like a rational adult standing in a grocery store aisle. There was a flash of recognition, and then there was action. That's it. That's the whole story of what separates people who freeze from people who move. It's not courage in the dramatic Hollywood sense. It's something quieter and, honestly, more impressive — the kind of instinct that only shows up when you're not performing for anyone, when there's no audience, when it's just you and the water and something that needs you right now. Except there was an audience. There was a camera. And that's the only reason the rest of us get to see what almost nobody on earth ever sees with their own eyes. Think about how many moments like this have happened throughout history with zero witnesses. Zero footage. Just a person and an animal and a lake and a decision made in half a second, then carried silently for the rest of that person's life as a story they tell at dinner parties that nobody quite believes. This time, it's different. This time there's proof. This time you don't have to take anyone's word for it, because it's all right there, unfolding in real time, no reenactment, no staging, no slow-motion dramatic score added in post-production. Just what actually happened, exactly as it happened, exactly when it happened. I keep coming back to the geometry of it. The distance. The angle. The way panic and instinct don't move in straight lines — they move in desperate, jagged little movements that somehow, against every probability, end up going in the right direction. There is a moment in this clip where the outcome could have gone either way, and if you watch closely, you can actually see the exact frame where it tips. That's the frame everyone remembers. That's the frame that gets posted in slow motion three days later with 40 million views and a caption that just says "I'm not crying you're crying." That's the frame you're going to screenshot without meaning to, just to look at it again after the video ends, because your brain doesn't want to let go of it yet. People love to say nature is cruel, indifferent, survival-of-the-fittest, red in tooth and claw. And sure — most of the time, that's true. Most of the time nobody's coming. Most of the time it's just you, alone, against odds nobody bothered to make fair. That's exactly why moments like this one matter so much when they happen. They're rare enough to be almost unbelievable, and real enough that you can't dismiss them as sentimental nonsense written for a greeting card. This isn't a story someone made up to make you feel something. Nobody scripted this. Nobody planned camera angles or hired someone to stand there looking heroic. It happened the way real things happen — badly framed, a little shaky, half of it almost missed entirely because the person holding the camera didn't know yet that they were about to capture something they'd be replaying in their head for years. I've spent more time than I'd like to admit trying to figure out why clips like this hit people so much harder than almost anything else on this platform. Wars, elections, business news, celebrity drama — all of it gets scrolled past in under two seconds. But this? This gets the full watch, the replay, the share, the comment that just says a single word because there are no other words that feel adequate. I think it's because this is proof of something we all quietly hope is true but rarely get to see confirmed: that when something is truly desperate, truly out of options, truly at the edge of what it can survive on its own — sometimes, not always, but sometimes — help actually shows up. Not because it's owed. Not because it's guaranteed. But because somewhere out there, someone was paying enough attention, and cared enough, to notice in time. That's a fragile kind of hope to build a worldview on. Most days the universe does not confirm it for you. Most days you're on your own and nobody's watching and nothing changes because you needed it to. But every once in a while, the universe hands you a receipt. Undeniable, filmed, timestamped proof that sometimes it does work out. Sometimes the thing that seems impossible five seconds before it happens becomes the thing everyone is talking about five seconds after. I've seen thousands of videos on this platform. I can count on one hand the ones that actually made my chest tighten before I even understood what I was watching. This is one of them. Not because of gore, not because of shock value, not because of some algorithm-bait fake drama edited together in Capcut with a trending sound slapped over the top. This is real, it's raw, it's completely unedited emotional whiplash, and it happens in under ninety seconds — which somehow makes it hit even harder, because you don't have time to brace yourself. You're just suddenly in it. There's a very particular kind of silence that happens in a room when someone shows this video to a friend who hasn't seen it yet. You know the silence. It's the one right after the moment happens, before anyone says anything, where both people are just sitting there processing. Then someone exhales. Then someone says "wait, go back." Then you watch it again, together this time, and somehow it's even more intense the second time because now you know it's coming. I've shown this to four people in the last two days. All four asked to watch it again immediately. Zero of them scrolled away before it finished. That's not normal behavior on this app. Nothing gets a hundred percent completion rate anymore — attention spans are too fractured, everyone's thumb is already halfway to the next post before the current one even loads fully. This one, people watch to the end. Every time. Here's a fact that should terrify you a little: most rescues like this one never make it onto a screen at all. Most of them happen in complete silence, witnessed by nobody, filmed by nobody, remembered by exactly one or two people who were there and nobody else. The only reason you get to see this one is a small, almost accidental miracle of timing — a camera that happened to be rolling, a person who happened to be exactly where they needed to be, at exactly the moment they needed to be there. Multiply that by every similar situation that has ever happened without a camera anywhere nearby, and you start to understand how much of the good in this world goes completely undocumented. How many small, quiet acts of decency happen every single day with zero witnesses and zero proof, simply because someone cared enough to act in a moment when nobody was watching and nobody would ever know. This time, we know. This time there's footage. And once you've seen it, you're going to understand exactly why it's already circulating everywhere, why people keep reposting it with captions that are just strings of crying emojis, why it's going to keep showing up on your feed for the next several weeks no matter how many times the algorithm thinks you've already seen it. I want to be very clear about something: I am not exaggerating for engagement here. I do this for a living. I've seen every trick in the book, every fake heartwarming edit, every staged "rescue" filmed for clout with a a paid actor and a script written by someone in a marketing meeting. I can spot fake from a mile away, and this is not that. This is the real thing, captured by accident, shared because it genuinely deserves to be seen, not because someone engineered it to go viral. The truth is, moments like this one are basically impossible to manufacture. You cannot fake the specific quality of panic that shows up right before help arrives. You cannot fake the particular kind of relief that shows up right after. Actors have tried for decades to replicate these exact emotional beats and it almost never works, because the real thing has a texture to it that fiction simply cannot copy. Your nervous system knows the difference even when your conscious mind can't articulate why. That's what you're about to watch. Not a performance. Not a recreation. The real, unscripted, entirely unplanned version of one of the oldest stories there is — something in trouble, someone who could have looked away, and a choice made in less time than it takes to read this sentence. I've thought a lot about what it says about a person, the instinct to move toward trouble instead of away from it. Most of us like to imagine we'd be the type to help. Fewer of us actually get tested on it in real time, with real stakes, with no time to think it through first. This footage is one of those rare, unfiltered tests, caught completely by accident, and the answer it reveals is the kind of answer that makes you want to believe better things about people in general. Maybe that's naive. Maybe I'm reading too much into ninety seconds of footage shot on a phone from a boat on a lake somewhere most of us will never visit. But I don't think so. I think there's a reason this specific kind of clip travels faster and further than almost anything else on this app, and I think it's because deep down, everyone scrolling past it is quietly starving for proof that the good instinct still wins sometimes. That somewhere, in some small unremarkable moment that nobody was supposed to see, it did. You're going to want to watch this at full volume. You're going to want to watch it more than once. And you're going to want to send it to at least one person the second it's over, because some things are simply too good, too raw, too real to keep to yourself. Scroll down. Hit play. Don't skip ahead. Let it happen the way it happened — in real time, unedited, exactly as it unfolded on a quiet morning that started like every other morning and ended up being one that a handful of people will never, ever forget. You'll know the exact second it gets you. Everybody does. And once it does, you're going to understand completely why this is already everywhere, why it's not going away anytime soon, and why — no matter how much content you consume on this platform every single day — this is the one still sitting in your head an hour from now. Watch it. Then watch it again. Then try to explain to someone else why you can't stop thinking about ninety seconds of footage from an ordinary morning on an ordinary lake. You won't be able to, not really, not in words that do it justice. Some things you just have to see for yourself. This is one of them. Let me back up for a second, because I think there's something worth unpacking about why this specific type of footage has such a strange grip on people who otherwise consider themselves fairly numb to the internet. We've all built up an immunity to most things online. Shock content doesn't shock anymore. Sad content doesn't move us the way it used to. Cute content gets a half-second smile and an immediate scroll. The threshold for actually feeling something has crept higher and higher every year, to the point where most creators have to exaggerate, stage, or manufacture emotion just to get a reaction out of an audience that's seen everything twice already. And then a clip like this shows up, completely unpolished, completely unplanned, filmed by someone who clearly had zero intention of ever going viral that morning, and it cuts through all of that noise instantly. No slow zoom. No dramatic music cue. No forced narration. Just a phone, a boat, a lake, and something happening in real time that nobody could have predicted five seconds before it happened. That's the part that gets me every time. The lack of preparation. You can tell, watching it, that the person holding the camera had no idea what they were about to capture. There's no anticipation in the framing. There's no build-up shot, no dramatic pause before the reveal. It just happens, mid-motion, mid-conversation probably, the way real things happen when nobody's expecting them to be filmed for posterity. I've worked with creators who spend six hours setting up a single ten-second clip to try to fake this exact energy. Lighting rigs. Multiple takes. A script written specifically to sound spontaneous. None of it ever quite lands the way this does, because authenticity has a signature that fabricated content simply cannot replicate no matter how good the equipment is. Your gut knows. It always knows. There's a reason the comments section under this kind of footage looks completely different from the comments section under almost anything else on this platform. No jokes. No sarcasm. No "this is fake" skepticism that usually shows up under viral content within the first ten minutes. Just people typing out real, unguarded reactions, the kind you don't normally see from adults who've spent years training themselves to look unbothered online. That tells you something. When a video manages to strip away the armor that most of us wear constantly while scrolling — the practiced cynicism, the ironic detachment, the instinct to act like nothing affects us — you know you're looking at something rare. Something that bypassed the defense mechanism entirely and went straight for the part of the brain that doesn't know how to perform indifference. I want to talk for a second about timing, because timing is the single most underrated element of this entire clip. A few seconds earlier or later in either direction, and this entire story looks completely different. That's the part that makes your stomach drop a little when you really sit with it. How close this came to being a story nobody ever heard, filmed by nobody, witnessed by nobody, remembered by nobody. We don't usually think about how much of what we consider "meant to be" is actually just an accumulation of tiny, invisible timing decisions stacking up in exactly the right order. A boat leaving the dock two minutes later than usual. A route taken slightly differently than the day before. A moment of quiet that happened to fall at exactly the right second for someone to notice something they easily could have missed entirely. Multiply those variables out and the odds of this exact sequence of events lining up the way it did start to feel almost absurd. And yet here it is, captured, verified, undeniable — proof that sometimes the universe threads a needle so precisely that even people who don't believe in fate start to wonder for a second. I don't think I'm being dramatic when I say that clips like this one function almost like modern folklore. A hundred years ago, this story would have been told around a table, passed down, exaggerated slightly with each retelling until nobody was quite sure anymore which parts were true and which parts had been embellished for effect. Today, it doesn't need to be exaggerated. It doesn't need embellishment. The raw footage does all the work that oral tradition used to have to do manually, and it does it more convincingly than any storyteller ever could, because you're not being told what happened — you're watching it happen, unfiltered, in real time, with your own eyes. That's a strange kind of privilege, honestly. Every generation before this one had to rely on someone else's description of moments like this. A witness recounting it secondhand, softened or sharpened depending on who was doing the telling. We don't have to rely on anyone's account. We get the primary source. We get the actual footage, timestamped, unedited, exactly as it happened, and we get to draw our own conclusions from it without anyone standing between us and the moment itself. I keep thinking about the people who happened to be nearby when this happened and had absolutely no idea, walking into that morning, that they were about to be part of something that would end up in front of millions of strangers within days. There's something almost dizzying about that. You wake up, you go about an entirely ordinary routine, and somewhere in the middle of an unremarkable morning, your life intersects with a moment that ends up mattering to people you will never meet, in places you will never visit, for reasons you probably never anticipated when you woke up that day. That's true of more moments than we realize, probably. Most of us will never know which ordinary Tuesday morning ends up being the one that quietly mattered more than we understood at the time. This is just one of the rare instances where we actually get to see it happen, see the exact moment it tips from ordinary into unforgettable, because a camera happened to be rolling and someone happened to hit record at exactly the right time. I also think there's something worth saying about the specific emotional cocktail this footage produces, because it's not simple. It's not just "aww, cute." It's not just relief. It's a genuinely layered reaction — fear first, because your brain registers the stakes before it registers anything else. Then tension, because you don't know yet how it resolves. Then, if you're paying attention, a strange kind of awe at how fast everything happens, how little time there was to think, how the entire outcome rested on a handful of seconds that could have gone completely differently. And then, right at the end, something that's hard to name precisely. Not just happiness. Something closer to relief mixed with gratitude mixed with a strange kind of faith restored in something you didn't realize you'd been losing faith in. That combination doesn't show up often. Most content gives you one emotion at a time, cleanly packaged, easy to categorize and move past. This gives you four or five emotions stacked on top of each other in the space of ninety seconds, and that's exactly why it lingers so much longer than almost anything else you'll scroll past today. I've been doing this long enough to know the difference between content that performs well because it's engineered to and content that performs well because it deserves to. This falls firmly into the second category. Nobody optimized this for engagement. Nobody thought about hook rate or average watch time or completion percentage while it was happening. It simply happened, and it happened to be extraordinary, and now it's traveling across the internet the old-fashioned way — person to person, share to share, because people genuinely can't help themselves. That's the purest form of virality there is, and it's becoming rarer every year as more and more content gets manufactured specifically to chase that exact outcome artificially. When something manages to go viral organically now, purely because it's real and it's rare and it deserves the attention, it stands out immediately against everything else competing for your scroll. You can feel the difference within the first few seconds, even if you can't articulate exactly why. I'll say this too — if you've made it this far into a post about a video you haven't even watched yet, that should tell you something. Most people don't read past the first two lines of anything on this platform anymore. If you're still here, some part of you already suspects this is worth your time. Trust that instinct. It's usually right. So here's what I'd suggest. Don't watch this distracted. Don't watch it with the sound off, scrolling past while doing three other things at once the way most of us consume content by default now. Give it the full ninety seconds of actual attention. Watch the water. Watch the timing. Watch the exact moment everything shifts, because that moment is the entire reason this clip exists in your feed right now instead of disappearing into the void the way ninety-nine percent of footage like this normally does. You'll understand within the first few seconds why this one didn't disappear. You'll understand why it's already been reposted thousands of times, why it keeps resurfacing on different accounts with different captions, why people who consider themselves completely desensitized to internet content are still talking about it days later. Some things are simply built to be remembered. This is one of them, and it earned that status the hard way — by actually happening, exactly the way you're about to see it, with absolutely nothing about it staged, softened, or exaggerated for effect. Hit play. You'll see what I mean before it even finishes. One last thing before you go watch it. I've noticed that the people who react the strongest to this clip are almost never the ones who consider themselves overly sentimental. It's the skeptics. The ones who claim they don't cry at commercials, don't get emotional over animal content, don't fall for "engagement bait" no matter how it's dressed up. Those are the ones who go quiet the fastest. Those are the ones who ask to see it again without explaining why. There's something almost funny about watching someone's carefully maintained emotional armor fail in real time over ninety seconds of unplanned footage from a random morning on a random lake. Maybe that'll be you. Maybe you're reading this thinking you're immune to this kind of thing, that you've seen enough of the internet to be unshakeable at this point. I've thought that before too, more than once, right up until the moment a video like this one proved me wrong in under two minutes. There's no trick here. No twist ending designed to manipulate you. No manufactured suspense built by a script written in a writers' room somewhere. Just a real moment, caught by accident, that turned an unremarkable morning into something worth remembering. Go watch it. Then come back and tell me I'm wrong. You won't.
1:23

There's a sound animals make when they've stopped hoping and started begging. Most people go their entire lives without ever hearing it. The men on that boat heard it at 6:40 in the morning, on water so still it looked like glass, in the kind of silence where you can hear your own heartbeat over the hum of the trolling motor. And then something in that silence moved. Not a fish. Not a bird. Something that had no business being where it was, doing what it was doing, for as long as it had clearly been doing it. I've watched this clip eleven times now and I still get the same reaction on the eleventh watch that I got on the first: a full-body flinch, followed by a slow, sinking realization of exactly what I'm looking at. That's rare. Most viral clips lose their power after the second viewing. This one doesn't. If anything it gets worse, because the more times you watch it, the more your brain starts doing the math on the timeline — how long, how far, how close it came to not ending the way it did. I'm not going to tell you what happens. I'm not going to describe the moment, because the moment is the entire point, and describing it would be like handing you a photograph of a sunset and calling it a vacation. You have to be there. You have to watch the water yourself and see it the way the man in the boat saw it — a fraction of a second before his brain even processed what his eyes were sending it. What I will tell you is this: there is a very specific kind of video that breaks the internet not because it's dramatic, not because it's violent, not because it's shocking in the traditional sense, but because it touches something older than language. Something underneath the part of your brain that scrolls. This is one of those videos. It hits the part of you that still remembers being small and scared and needing someone bigger to notice you. Every single person who has ever felt helpless, ever felt like they were fighting something too big for them alone, ever needed a hand reaching down when they had nothing left to reach back with — that person is going to feel this clip in their chest before their mind even catches up. Here's the part nobody talks about when they share this kind of footage: the decision-making window was almost nonexistent. There was no time to think, no time to debate, no time to weigh pros and cons like a rational adult standing in a grocery store aisle. There was a flash of recognition, and then there was action. That's it. That's the whole story of what separates people who freeze from people who move. It's not courage in the dramatic Hollywood sense. It's something quieter and, honestly, more impressive — the kind of instinct that only shows up when you're not performing for anyone, when there's no audience, when it's just you and the water and something that needs you right now. Except there was an audience. There was a camera. And that's the only reason the rest of us get to see what almost nobody on earth ever sees with their own eyes. Think about how many moments like this have happened throughout history with zero witnesses. Zero footage. Just a person and an animal and a lake and a decision made in half a second, then carried silently for the rest of that person's life as a story they tell at dinner parties that nobody quite believes. This time, it's different. This time there's proof. This time you don't have to take anyone's word for it, because it's all right there, unfolding in real time, no reenactment, no staging, no slow-motion dramatic score added in post-production. Just what actually happened, exactly as it happened, exactly when it happened. I keep coming back to the geometry of it. The distance. The angle. The way panic and instinct don't move in straight lines — they move in desperate, jagged little movements that somehow, against every probability, end up going in the right direction. There is a moment in this clip where the outcome could have gone either way, and if you watch closely, you can actually see the exact frame where it tips. That's the frame everyone remembers. That's the frame that gets posted in slow motion three days later with 40 million views and a caption that just says "I'm not crying you're crying." That's the frame you're going to screenshot without meaning to, just to look at it again after the video ends, because your brain doesn't want to let go of it yet. People love to say nature is cruel, indifferent, survival-of-the-fittest, red in tooth and claw. And sure — most of the time, that's true. Most of the time nobody's coming. Most of the time it's just you, alone, against odds nobody bothered to make fair. That's exactly why moments like this one matter so much when they happen. They're rare enough to be almost unbelievable, and real enough that you can't dismiss them as sentimental nonsense written for a greeting card. This isn't a story someone made up to make you feel something. Nobody scripted this. Nobody planned camera angles or hired someone to stand there looking heroic. It happened the way real things happen — badly framed, a little shaky, half of it almost missed entirely because the person holding the camera didn't know yet that they were about to capture something they'd be replaying in their head for years. I've spent more time than I'd like to admit trying to figure out why clips like this hit people so much harder than almost anything else on this platform. Wars, elections, business news, celebrity drama — all of it gets scrolled past in under two seconds. But this? This gets the full watch, the replay, the share, the comment that just says a single word because there are no other words that feel adequate. I think it's because this is proof of something we all quietly hope is true but rarely get to see confirmed: that when something is truly desperate, truly out of options, truly at the edge of what it can survive on its own — sometimes, not always, but sometimes — help actually shows up. Not because it's owed. Not because it's guaranteed. But because somewhere out there, someone was paying enough attention, and cared enough, to notice in time. That's a fragile kind of hope to build a worldview on. Most days the universe does not confirm it for you. Most days you're on your own and nobody's watching and nothing changes because you needed it to. But every once in a while, the universe hands you a receipt. Undeniable, filmed, timestamped proof that sometimes it does work out. Sometimes the thing that seems impossible five seconds before it happens becomes the thing everyone is talking about five seconds after. I've seen thousands of videos on this platform. I can count on one hand the ones that actually made my chest tighten before I even understood what I was watching. This is one of them. Not because of gore, not because of shock value, not because of some algorithm-bait fake drama edited together in Capcut with a trending sound slapped over the top. This is real, it's raw, it's completely unedited emotional whiplash, and it happens in under ninety seconds — which somehow makes it hit even harder, because you don't have time to brace yourself. You're just suddenly in it. There's a very particular kind of silence that happens in a room when someone shows this video to a friend who hasn't seen it yet. You know the silence. It's the one right after the moment happens, before anyone says anything, where both people are just sitting there processing. Then someone exhales. Then someone says "wait, go back." Then you watch it again, together this time, and somehow it's even more intense the second time because now you know it's coming. I've shown this to four people in the last two days. All four asked to watch it again immediately. Zero of them scrolled away before it finished. That's not normal behavior on this app. Nothing gets a hundred percent completion rate anymore — attention spans are too fractured, everyone's thumb is already halfway to the next post before the current one even loads fully. This one, people watch to the end. Every time. Here's a fact that should terrify you a little: most rescues like this one never make it onto a screen at all. Most of them happen in complete silence, witnessed by nobody, filmed by nobody, remembered by exactly one or two people who were there and nobody else. The only reason you get to see this one is a small, almost accidental miracle of timing — a camera that happened to be rolling, a person who happened to be exactly where they needed to be, at exactly the moment they needed to be there. Multiply that by every similar situation that has ever happened without a camera anywhere nearby, and you start to understand how much of the good in this world goes completely undocumented. How many small, quiet acts of decency happen every single day with zero witnesses and zero proof, simply because someone cared enough to act in a moment when nobody was watching and nobody would ever know. This time, we know. This time there's footage. And once you've seen it, you're going to understand exactly why it's already circulating everywhere, why people keep reposting it with captions that are just strings of crying emojis, why it's going to keep showing up on your feed for the next several weeks no matter how many times the algorithm thinks you've already seen it. I want to be very clear about something: I am not exaggerating for engagement here. I do this for a living. I've seen every trick in the book, every fake heartwarming edit, every staged "rescue" filmed for clout with a a paid actor and a script written by someone in a marketing meeting. I can spot fake from a mile away, and this is not that. This is the real thing, captured by accident, shared because it genuinely deserves to be seen, not because someone engineered it to go viral. The truth is, moments like this one are basically impossible to manufacture. You cannot fake the specific quality of panic that shows up right before help arrives. You cannot fake the particular kind of relief that shows up right after. Actors have tried for decades to replicate these exact emotional beats and it almost never works, because the real thing has a texture to it that fiction simply cannot copy. Your nervous system knows the difference even when your conscious mind can't articulate why. That's what you're about to watch. Not a performance. Not a recreation. The real, unscripted, entirely unplanned version of one of the oldest stories there is — something in trouble, someone who could have looked away, and a choice made in less time than it takes to read this sentence. I've thought a lot about what it says about a person, the instinct to move toward trouble instead of away from it. Most of us like to imagine we'd be the type to help. Fewer of us actually get tested on it in real time, with real stakes, with no time to think it through first. This footage is one of those rare, unfiltered tests, caught completely by accident, and the answer it reveals is the kind of answer that makes you want to believe better things about people in general. Maybe that's naive. Maybe I'm reading too much into ninety seconds of footage shot on a phone from a boat on a lake somewhere most of us will never visit. But I don't think so. I think there's a reason this specific kind of clip travels faster and further than almost anything else on this app, and I think it's because deep down, everyone scrolling past it is quietly starving for proof that the good instinct still wins sometimes. That somewhere, in some small unremarkable moment that nobody was supposed to see, it did. You're going to want to watch this at full volume. You're going to want to watch it more than once. And you're going to want to send it to at least one person the second it's over, because some things are simply too good, too raw, too real to keep to yourself. Scroll down. Hit play. Don't skip ahead. Let it happen the way it happened — in real time, unedited, exactly as it unfolded on a quiet morning that started like every other morning and ended up being one that a handful of people will never, ever forget. You'll know the exact second it gets you. Everybody does. And once it does, you're going to understand completely why this is already everywhere, why it's not going away anytime soon, and why — no matter how much content you consume on this platform every single day — this is the one still sitting in your head an hour from now. Watch it. Then watch it again. Then try to explain to someone else why you can't stop thinking about ninety seconds of footage from an ordinary morning on an ordinary lake. You won't be able to, not really, not in words that do it justice. Some things you just have to see for yourself. This is one of them. Let me back up for a second, because I think there's something worth unpacking about why this specific type of footage has such a strange grip on people who otherwise consider themselves fairly numb to the internet. We've all built up an immunity to most things online. Shock content doesn't shock anymore. Sad content doesn't move us the way it used to. Cute content gets a half-second smile and an immediate scroll. The threshold for actually feeling something has crept higher and higher every year, to the point where most creators have to exaggerate, stage, or manufacture emotion just to get a reaction out of an audience that's seen everything twice already. And then a clip like this shows up, completely unpolished, completely unplanned, filmed by someone who clearly had zero intention of ever going viral that morning, and it cuts through all of that noise instantly. No slow zoom. No dramatic music cue. No forced narration. Just a phone, a boat, a lake, and something happening in real time that nobody could have predicted five seconds before it happened. That's the part that gets me every time. The lack of preparation. You can tell, watching it, that the person holding the camera had no idea what they were about to capture. There's no anticipation in the framing. There's no build-up shot, no dramatic pause before the reveal. It just happens, mid-motion, mid-conversation probably, the way real things happen when nobody's expecting them to be filmed for posterity. I've worked with creators who spend six hours setting up a single ten-second clip to try to fake this exact energy. Lighting rigs. Multiple takes. A script written specifically to sound spontaneous. None of it ever quite lands the way this does, because authenticity has a signature that fabricated content simply cannot replicate no matter how good the equipment is. Your gut knows. It always knows. There's a reason the comments section under this kind of footage looks completely different from the comments section under almost anything else on this platform. No jokes. No sarcasm. No "this is fake" skepticism that usually shows up under viral content within the first ten minutes. Just people typing out real, unguarded reactions, the kind you don't normally see from adults who've spent years training themselves to look unbothered online. That tells you something. When a video manages to strip away the armor that most of us wear constantly while scrolling — the practiced cynicism, the ironic detachment, the instinct to act like nothing affects us — you know you're looking at something rare. Something that bypassed the defense mechanism entirely and went straight for the part of the brain that doesn't know how to perform indifference. I want to talk for a second about timing, because timing is the single most underrated element of this entire clip. A few seconds earlier or later in either direction, and this entire story looks completely different. That's the part that makes your stomach drop a little when you really sit with it. How close this came to being a story nobody ever heard, filmed by nobody, witnessed by nobody, remembered by nobody. We don't usually think about how much of what we consider "meant to be" is actually just an accumulation of tiny, invisible timing decisions stacking up in exactly the right order. A boat leaving the dock two minutes later than usual. A route taken slightly differently than the day before. A moment of quiet that happened to fall at exactly the right second for someone to notice something they easily could have missed entirely. Multiply those variables out and the odds of this exact sequence of events lining up the way it did start to feel almost absurd. And yet here it is, captured, verified, undeniable — proof that sometimes the universe threads a needle so precisely that even people who don't believe in fate start to wonder for a second. I don't think I'm being dramatic when I say that clips like this one function almost like modern folklore. A hundred years ago, this story would have been told around a table, passed down, exaggerated slightly with each retelling until nobody was quite sure anymore which parts were true and which parts had been embellished for effect. Today, it doesn't need to be exaggerated. It doesn't need embellishment. The raw footage does all the work that oral tradition used to have to do manually, and it does it more convincingly than any storyteller ever could, because you're not being told what happened — you're watching it happen, unfiltered, in real time, with your own eyes. That's a strange kind of privilege, honestly. Every generation before this one had to rely on someone else's description of moments like this. A witness recounting it secondhand, softened or sharpened depending on who was doing the telling. We don't have to rely on anyone's account. We get the primary source. We get the actual footage, timestamped, unedited, exactly as it happened, and we get to draw our own conclusions from it without anyone standing between us and the moment itself. I keep thinking about the people who happened to be nearby when this happened and had absolutely no idea, walking into that morning, that they were about to be part of something that would end up in front of millions of strangers within days. There's something almost dizzying about that. You wake up, you go about an entirely ordinary routine, and somewhere in the middle of an unremarkable morning, your life intersects with a moment that ends up mattering to people you will never meet, in places you will never visit, for reasons you probably never anticipated when you woke up that day. That's true of more moments than we realize, probably. Most of us will never know which ordinary Tuesday morning ends up being the one that quietly mattered more than we understood at the time. This is just one of the rare instances where we actually get to see it happen, see the exact moment it tips from ordinary into unforgettable, because a camera happened to be rolling and someone happened to hit record at exactly the right time. I also think there's something worth saying about the specific emotional cocktail this footage produces, because it's not simple. It's not just "aww, cute." It's not just relief. It's a genuinely layered reaction — fear first, because your brain registers the stakes before it registers anything else. Then tension, because you don't know yet how it resolves. Then, if you're paying attention, a strange kind of awe at how fast everything happens, how little time there was to think, how the entire outcome rested on a handful of seconds that could have gone completely differently. And then, right at the end, something that's hard to name precisely. Not just happiness. Something closer to relief mixed with gratitude mixed with a strange kind of faith restored in something you didn't realize you'd been losing faith in. That combination doesn't show up often. Most content gives you one emotion at a time, cleanly packaged, easy to categorize and move past. This gives you four or five emotions stacked on top of each other in the space of ninety seconds, and that's exactly why it lingers so much longer than almost anything else you'll scroll past today. I've been doing this long enough to know the difference between content that performs well because it's engineered to and content that performs well because it deserves to. This falls firmly into the second category. Nobody optimized this for engagement. Nobody thought about hook rate or average watch time or completion percentage while it was happening. It simply happened, and it happened to be extraordinary, and now it's traveling across the internet the old-fashioned way — person to person, share to share, because people genuinely can't help themselves. That's the purest form of virality there is, and it's becoming rarer every year as more and more content gets manufactured specifically to chase that exact outcome artificially. When something manages to go viral organically now, purely because it's real and it's rare and it deserves the attention, it stands out immediately against everything else competing for your scroll. You can feel the difference within the first few seconds, even if you can't articulate exactly why. I'll say this too — if you've made it this far into a post about a video you haven't even watched yet, that should tell you something. Most people don't read past the first two lines of anything on this platform anymore. If you're still here, some part of you already suspects this is worth your time. Trust that instinct. It's usually right. So here's what I'd suggest. Don't watch this distracted. Don't watch it with the sound off, scrolling past while doing three other things at once the way most of us consume content by default now. Give it the full ninety seconds of actual attention. Watch the water. Watch the timing. Watch the exact moment everything shifts, because that moment is the entire reason this clip exists in your feed right now instead of disappearing into the void the way ninety-nine percent of footage like this normally does. You'll understand within the first few seconds why this one didn't disappear. You'll understand why it's already been reposted thousands of times, why it keeps resurfacing on different accounts with different captions, why people who consider themselves completely desensitized to internet content are still talking about it days later. Some things are simply built to be remembered. This is one of them, and it earned that status the hard way — by actually happening, exactly the way you're about to see it, with absolutely nothing about it staged, softened, or exaggerated for effect. Hit play. You'll see what I mean before it even finishes. One last thing before you go watch it. I've noticed that the people who react the strongest to this clip are almost never the ones who consider themselves overly sentimental. It's the skeptics. The ones who claim they don't cry at commercials, don't get emotional over animal content, don't fall for "engagement bait" no matter how it's dressed up. Those are the ones who go quiet the fastest. Those are the ones who ask to see it again without explaining why. There's something almost funny about watching someone's carefully maintained emotional armor fail in real time over ninety seconds of unplanned footage from a random morning on a random lake. Maybe that'll be you. Maybe you're reading this thinking you're immune to this kind of thing, that you've seen enough of the internet to be unshakeable at this point. I've thought that before too, more than once, right up until the moment a video like this one proved me wrong in under two minutes. There's no trick here. No twist ending designed to manipulate you. No manufactured suspense built by a script written in a writers' room somewhere. Just a real moment, caught by accident, that turned an unremarkable morning into something worth remembering. Go watch it. Then come back and tell me I'm wrong. You won't.

Earth Unveiled

81,971 views • 14 days ago

CANCEL Your Weekend Plans, & Learn Claude Code Today. This Claude Code teaches more about vibe-coding in 30 mins than most tutorials do in hours. Save this, it'll change how you build forever People are building entire apps and charging clients $5,000 to $20,000 using Claude Code. This Claude Code video is a goldmine. Full Claude Code tutorial. Beginner to pro. Every feature. Every setup step. Every best practice. Zero prior knowledge needed. Save it. Watch it tonight. Not tomorrow. Tonight. Follow Himanshu Kumar so you don't miss the breakdowns for each feature. This is your complete Claude Code roadmap. Lose it and you lose the next 12 months of income. ↓ 1. Understand What Claude Code Actually Is. You think Claude Code is just another chatbot. It's not. And that misunderstanding is why you're broke. ChatGPT gives you text. Claude Code gives you software. It runs in your terminal. It reads your entire codebase. It writes files directly to your project. It runs commands on your machine. It debugs errors autonomously. It builds features end to end. You're not chatting. You're deploying a developer. One that works 24/7. Never asks for a raise. Never calls in sick. Never pushes broken code at 5 PM on a Friday. People are charging clients $5,000-$10,000 for apps they built with Claude Code in 3 hours. And you didn't even know this tool existed because you're still asking ChatGPT to write you a to-do list. The gap between you and people making money with AI isn't intelligence. It's awareness. Now you're aware. Save this post. Follow Himanshu Kumar for the complete breakdown of every Claude Code feature. ↓ 2. Set Up Claude Code Properly. Most people quit here. "It's too complicated." "I don't know terminal." "I'll set it up later." Later never comes. And "complicated" means "I watched for 30 seconds and gave up." The setup takes 10 minutes. Install Node.js. Install Claude Code via npm. Authenticate your account. Open your terminal. Done. 10 minutes. You spent longer this morning deciding what to have for breakfast. The video walks through every single click. Every command. Every screen. Assuming you know absolutely nothing. If you can download an app on your phone, you can set up Claude Code. It's the same level of difficulty. But you'll still tell yourself it's "too technical" because that excuse is more comfortable than admitting you're just scared to try something new. This is the setup that everything else builds on. Skip it and nothing works. ↓ 3. Use the Desktop App. You don't even need to live in the terminal if you don't want to. Claude Code has a desktop app. Clean interface. Visual feedback. Everything you need without touching command line. But here's the thing most people don't know: The desktop app isn't just a pretty wrapper. It lets you manage projects visually. See file changes in real time. Switch between projects instantly. The people making money with Claude Code use the desktop app for client projects because it's faster to manage multiple builds simultaneously. You're still opening 14 browser tabs to organize one project. They open one app and everything's there. Efficiency isn't a personality trait. It's a tool choice. Save this post. Follow Himanshu Kumar for the desktop app workflow that handles 5 client projects at once. ↓ 4. Install the Right Dependencies. This is where beginners silently fail and blame the tool. Claude Code needs certain dependencies installed to work properly. Miss one and everything breaks. Then you go on Twitter and say "Claude Code doesn't work." It works fine. You just didn't read the setup guide. The video covers every dependency you need. What to install. How to install it. How to verify it's working. No guessing. No Stack Overflow rabbit holes at midnight. No "why isn't this working" for 3 hours. Watch the dependency section once. Follow every step. Never deal with setup issues again. You spent more time last week troubleshooting a printer than this takes. ↓ 5. Work Inside Your Code Editor. Claude Code integrates directly with your code editor. VS Code. Cursor. Whatever you use. It's not a separate window you alt-tab between. It's right there. In your workflow. You type a request. Claude writes the code. The code appears in your editor. You review it. Accept it. Done. No copy pasting between windows. No reformatting code that got mangled in transit. No "which version was the right one." It's like pair programming with someone who never gets distracted, never argues about naming conventions, and actually writes code that works on the first try. Your current coding process is: Google the problem, read 5 answers on Stack Overflow, copy the wrong one, debug for an hour, find the right one, paste it in, break something else, repeat. Claude Code's process is: describe what you want, get working code, move on with your life. Same hour. One method produces working software. The other produces frustration and a browser history full of Stack Overflow tabs. Stop coding the hard way. Save this post. Follow Himanshu Kumar for code editor setup guides and integration tips. ↓ 6. Master Basic Usage. Most people learn 5% of a tool and say they "know" it. You "know" Photoshop because you can crop an image. You "know" Excel because you can sum a column. You "know" Claude Code because you asked it one question. Basic usage means: How to give Claude Code context about your project. How to ask for changes to existing code. How to generate new files and features. How to review what Claude produces. How to iterate when the output isn't perfect. These basics are the foundation of everything. Skip them and every advanced feature feels confusing. Master them and every advanced feature feels obvious. The video breaks down each one with real examples. Not theory. Actual usage on actual projects. You've been using AI tools at 5% capacity and wondering why your results are 5% of what others get. Save this post. Follow Himanshu Kumar for daily Claude Code usage tips. ↓ 7. Learn Every Command. Claude Code has commands that most users never discover. Because most users type one message and expect magic. That's not how professionals use it. Professionals use specific commands that tell Claude Code exactly what to do, how to do it, and what constraints to follow. The difference between a beginner and someone making $10K/month with Claude Code is knowing which command to use and when. The video walks through every single one. Not just what they do. But when to use each one. And why one command is better than another for specific situations. You've been using Claude Code like a hammer. These commands turn it into a full toolbox. Stop treating a power tool like a blunt instrument. Save this post. Follow Himanshu Kumar for the command cheat sheet I use daily. ↓ 8. Understand Modes and Shortcuts. Speed matters. The person who builds an app in 2 hours charges $5,000. The person who builds the same app in 2 days charges $2,000. Same app. Same quality. Different speed. Different income. Claude Code has modes that change how it operates. And shortcuts that cut your workflow time in half. Most people don't know either exists. They use Claude Code in default mode for everything. Like driving a car in first gear on the highway. Technically it works. But everyone is passing you. The video shows you every mode. Every shortcut. Every time-saving trick that separates the people charging $2,000 per project from the people charging $10,000. Speed is money. Literally. Save this post. Follow Himanshu Kumar for the shortcuts that cut my build time by 60%. ↓ 9. Write a Proper Planning Prompt. This is the section that separates amateurs from professionals. And it's the section most people skip. A planning prompt tells Claude Code what you're building before you start building it. Architecture. File structure. Technologies. Features. Constraints. Edge cases. Without a planning prompt, Claude Code guesses. And guessing produces garbage. With a planning prompt, Claude Code executes a clear plan. And clear plans produce working software. The video shows you exactly how to write a planning prompt that makes Claude Code produce professional-grade output on the first try. "But I just want to start coding." That's why your code breaks every time. That's why you restart projects 4 times. That's why nothing you build ever gets finished. Because you refuse to plan. A 5-minute planning prompt saves you 5 hours of debugging. But you'd rather skip the 5 minutes and suffer through the 5 hours because patience isn't your thing. And that's exactly why you're not making money. Planning is the most underpaid skill in coding. And the most overpaid when you master it. Save this post. Follow Himanshu Kumar for the planning prompt templates I use for every client project. ↓ 10. Choose the Right Model. Claude Code lets you select different AI models. Not all models are the same. Not all tasks need the same model. Using the most powerful model for a simple task wastes credits. Using a basic model for a complex task wastes time. The video explains: Which model to use for quick fixes. Which model to use for complex architecture. Which model to use for debugging. Which model to use for code generation. Most people pick one model and use it for everything. That's like using a sledgehammer to hang a picture frame. Model selection is strategy. And strategy is money. The people making $10K/month with Claude Code are strategic about every credit they spend. You're burning through credits because you use the most expensive model to write a hello world. ↓ 11. Use Git and Version Control. If you're not using version control, you're one mistake away from losing everything. Claude Code integrates with Git. Every change tracked. Every version saved. Every mistake reversible. Without Git: Claude makes a change. It breaks something. You can't undo it. You start over. 3 hours wasted. With Git: Claude makes a change. It breaks something. You roll back in 5 seconds. Keep working. Version control isn't optional. It's insurance. And the people not using it are the same people who say "I lost my entire project" like it's something that just happens. It doesn't just happen. It happens because you didn't set up Git. The video walks through the entire Git integration. Save this post. Follow Himanshu Kumar for the Git workflow that's saved every project I've ever built. ↓ 12. Set Up Claude MD and Memory. This is the feature that makes Claude Code feel like a real team member instead of a stranger you explain everything to every time. ClaudeMD is a memory file. You tell Claude Code about your project once. It remembers forever. Coding style preferences. Project architecture decisions. Technology stack. File naming conventions. Business logic rules. Without ClaudeMD: Every new conversation starts from zero. You explain the same things repeatedly. Output is inconsistent. With ClaudeMD: Claude knows your project. Claude follows your rules. Claude produces consistent, professional code. The difference between a sloppy freelancer and a reliable agency is consistency. Claude. MD gives you consistency without the agency overhead. Most people don't set this up and wonder why Claude Code gives different answers every time. ↓ 13. Automate with Tasks. This is where Claude Code stops being a tool and starts being an employee. Tasks let you define repeating workflows. "Every time I push code, run tests." "Every time I create a new file, add boilerplate." "Every time I start a session, check for errors." Automated. Hands-free. Consistent. You're doing these things manually every single day. The same checks. The same steps. The same routine. Tasks do them automatically. So you can focus on the work that actually makes money. Every manual task you automate is time you get back. And time is the only thing you can never make more of. Save this post. Follow Himanshu Kumar for the task automation templates that run my entire workflow. ↓ 14. Explore Features Most People Never Touch. The video covers features that 95% of Claude Code users don't know exist. Because they watched a 3-minute TikTok about Claude Code and think they're experts now. They're not. They're using 5% of a tool that can do everything. The full tutorial goes deep into features that most tutorials skip because they're "too advanced." They're not too advanced. They're too valuable for lazy creators to bother explaining. This video explains all of them. Clearly. For beginners. The 5% of features you don't know about are the 5% that make people rich. ↓ Let's zoom out. I just broke down 14 sections of Claude Code. Setup and installation. Desktop app. Dependencies. Code editor integration. Basic usage. Commands. Modes and shortcuts. Planning prompts. Model selection. Git and version control. Memory and Claude. MD. Tasks and automation. Advanced features. All in one video. All free. All beginner friendly. The person who masters even half of these in the next 2 weeks will be in the top 1% of Claude Code users. The top 1% of Claude Code users are the ones charging $5,000-$10,000 per project and building them in a single afternoon. Everyone else is asking ChatGPT to fix their resume. Same tools. Same access. Completely different outcomes. Because one person treats AI like a toy. And the other treats it like a business. ↓ Here's the hard truth nobody wants to hear. You don't have a talent problem. You don't have an intelligence problem. You don't have a resources problem. You have an action problem. Everything I just listed has a free tutorial right here in the attached video. 33 minutes. That's it. 33 minutes to learn the tool that people are using to build $5,000-$20,000/month businesses. You spent more time today scrolling Twitter than it takes to watch this video. You spent more time this week watching Netflix than it takes to master Claude Code basics. You spent more time this month doing nothing than it would take to completely change your income. The information is free. The tool is accessible. The opportunity is here. The only thing missing is you caring enough to start. ↓ CANCEL your plans this week. This isn't optional anymore. The people learning Claude Code right now will be building apps for the people who didn't learn it. That's not a prediction. That's already happening. Companies are replacing $150/hour developers with one person and Claude Code. If you code: learn Claude Code or become half as valuable by next year. If you don't code: learn Claude Code or miss the biggest opportunity to start earning from tech without a CS degree. There's no path forward that doesn't include AI coding tools. None. You have one window. Right now. This week. ↓ Here's your action plan for the next 7 days: Day 1: Watch the full video. Install Claude Code. Set up dependencies. Day 2: Learn basic usage. Try 5 different commands. Day 3: Write your first planning prompt. Build a small project. Day 4: Set up Claude. MD. Configure your memory file. Day 5: Master modes and shortcuts. Build a second project faster. Day 6: Set up Git integration. Automate with tasks. Day 7: Build something real. A tool, an app, a website. Ship it. 7 days. One tool. One completely different skill set. One completely different income potential. Or 7 more days of scrolling Twitter watching other people build things while you "plan to start." Your call. ↓ This is the most important video you'll watch this year. 33 minutes. Complete Claude Code mastery. From zero to building real projects. Save this post. Come back to it every single day this week. Check off each section as you complete it. Follow Himanshu Kumarfor daily Claude Code breakdowns, advanced tutorials, and the exact workflows that are turning beginners into $10K/month builders. The only thing between you and $10K/month with Claude Code is this video and 7 days. Don't waste them. You Must Follow me Himanshu Kumar, so i can send you DM.
35:48

CANCEL Your Weekend Plans, & Learn Claude Code Today. This Claude Code teaches more about vibe-coding in 30 mins than most tutorials do in hours. Save this, it'll change how you build forever People are building entire apps and charging clients $5,000 to $20,000 using Claude Code. This Claude Code video is a goldmine. Full Claude Code tutorial. Beginner to pro. Every feature. Every setup step. Every best practice. Zero prior knowledge needed. Save it. Watch it tonight. Not tomorrow. Tonight. Follow Himanshu Kumar so you don't miss the breakdowns for each feature. This is your complete Claude Code roadmap. Lose it and you lose the next 12 months of income. ↓ 1. Understand What Claude Code Actually Is. You think Claude Code is just another chatbot. It's not. And that misunderstanding is why you're broke. ChatGPT gives you text. Claude Code gives you software. It runs in your terminal. It reads your entire codebase. It writes files directly to your project. It runs commands on your machine. It debugs errors autonomously. It builds features end to end. You're not chatting. You're deploying a developer. One that works 24/7. Never asks for a raise. Never calls in sick. Never pushes broken code at 5 PM on a Friday. People are charging clients $5,000-$10,000 for apps they built with Claude Code in 3 hours. And you didn't even know this tool existed because you're still asking ChatGPT to write you a to-do list. The gap between you and people making money with AI isn't intelligence. It's awareness. Now you're aware. Save this post. Follow Himanshu Kumar for the complete breakdown of every Claude Code feature. ↓ 2. Set Up Claude Code Properly. Most people quit here. "It's too complicated." "I don't know terminal." "I'll set it up later." Later never comes. And "complicated" means "I watched for 30 seconds and gave up." The setup takes 10 minutes. Install Node.js. Install Claude Code via npm. Authenticate your account. Open your terminal. Done. 10 minutes. You spent longer this morning deciding what to have for breakfast. The video walks through every single click. Every command. Every screen. Assuming you know absolutely nothing. If you can download an app on your phone, you can set up Claude Code. It's the same level of difficulty. But you'll still tell yourself it's "too technical" because that excuse is more comfortable than admitting you're just scared to try something new. This is the setup that everything else builds on. Skip it and nothing works. ↓ 3. Use the Desktop App. You don't even need to live in the terminal if you don't want to. Claude Code has a desktop app. Clean interface. Visual feedback. Everything you need without touching command line. But here's the thing most people don't know: The desktop app isn't just a pretty wrapper. It lets you manage projects visually. See file changes in real time. Switch between projects instantly. The people making money with Claude Code use the desktop app for client projects because it's faster to manage multiple builds simultaneously. You're still opening 14 browser tabs to organize one project. They open one app and everything's there. Efficiency isn't a personality trait. It's a tool choice. Save this post. Follow Himanshu Kumar for the desktop app workflow that handles 5 client projects at once. ↓ 4. Install the Right Dependencies. This is where beginners silently fail and blame the tool. Claude Code needs certain dependencies installed to work properly. Miss one and everything breaks. Then you go on Twitter and say "Claude Code doesn't work." It works fine. You just didn't read the setup guide. The video covers every dependency you need. What to install. How to install it. How to verify it's working. No guessing. No Stack Overflow rabbit holes at midnight. No "why isn't this working" for 3 hours. Watch the dependency section once. Follow every step. Never deal with setup issues again. You spent more time last week troubleshooting a printer than this takes. ↓ 5. Work Inside Your Code Editor. Claude Code integrates directly with your code editor. VS Code. Cursor. Whatever you use. It's not a separate window you alt-tab between. It's right there. In your workflow. You type a request. Claude writes the code. The code appears in your editor. You review it. Accept it. Done. No copy pasting between windows. No reformatting code that got mangled in transit. No "which version was the right one." It's like pair programming with someone who never gets distracted, never argues about naming conventions, and actually writes code that works on the first try. Your current coding process is: Google the problem, read 5 answers on Stack Overflow, copy the wrong one, debug for an hour, find the right one, paste it in, break something else, repeat. Claude Code's process is: describe what you want, get working code, move on with your life. Same hour. One method produces working software. The other produces frustration and a browser history full of Stack Overflow tabs. Stop coding the hard way. Save this post. Follow Himanshu Kumar for code editor setup guides and integration tips. ↓ 6. Master Basic Usage. Most people learn 5% of a tool and say they "know" it. You "know" Photoshop because you can crop an image. You "know" Excel because you can sum a column. You "know" Claude Code because you asked it one question. Basic usage means: How to give Claude Code context about your project. How to ask for changes to existing code. How to generate new files and features. How to review what Claude produces. How to iterate when the output isn't perfect. These basics are the foundation of everything. Skip them and every advanced feature feels confusing. Master them and every advanced feature feels obvious. The video breaks down each one with real examples. Not theory. Actual usage on actual projects. You've been using AI tools at 5% capacity and wondering why your results are 5% of what others get. Save this post. Follow Himanshu Kumar for daily Claude Code usage tips. ↓ 7. Learn Every Command. Claude Code has commands that most users never discover. Because most users type one message and expect magic. That's not how professionals use it. Professionals use specific commands that tell Claude Code exactly what to do, how to do it, and what constraints to follow. The difference between a beginner and someone making $10K/month with Claude Code is knowing which command to use and when. The video walks through every single one. Not just what they do. But when to use each one. And why one command is better than another for specific situations. You've been using Claude Code like a hammer. These commands turn it into a full toolbox. Stop treating a power tool like a blunt instrument. Save this post. Follow Himanshu Kumar for the command cheat sheet I use daily. ↓ 8. Understand Modes and Shortcuts. Speed matters. The person who builds an app in 2 hours charges $5,000. The person who builds the same app in 2 days charges $2,000. Same app. Same quality. Different speed. Different income. Claude Code has modes that change how it operates. And shortcuts that cut your workflow time in half. Most people don't know either exists. They use Claude Code in default mode for everything. Like driving a car in first gear on the highway. Technically it works. But everyone is passing you. The video shows you every mode. Every shortcut. Every time-saving trick that separates the people charging $2,000 per project from the people charging $10,000. Speed is money. Literally. Save this post. Follow Himanshu Kumar for the shortcuts that cut my build time by 60%. ↓ 9. Write a Proper Planning Prompt. This is the section that separates amateurs from professionals. And it's the section most people skip. A planning prompt tells Claude Code what you're building before you start building it. Architecture. File structure. Technologies. Features. Constraints. Edge cases. Without a planning prompt, Claude Code guesses. And guessing produces garbage. With a planning prompt, Claude Code executes a clear plan. And clear plans produce working software. The video shows you exactly how to write a planning prompt that makes Claude Code produce professional-grade output on the first try. "But I just want to start coding." That's why your code breaks every time. That's why you restart projects 4 times. That's why nothing you build ever gets finished. Because you refuse to plan. A 5-minute planning prompt saves you 5 hours of debugging. But you'd rather skip the 5 minutes and suffer through the 5 hours because patience isn't your thing. And that's exactly why you're not making money. Planning is the most underpaid skill in coding. And the most overpaid when you master it. Save this post. Follow Himanshu Kumar for the planning prompt templates I use for every client project. ↓ 10. Choose the Right Model. Claude Code lets you select different AI models. Not all models are the same. Not all tasks need the same model. Using the most powerful model for a simple task wastes credits. Using a basic model for a complex task wastes time. The video explains: Which model to use for quick fixes. Which model to use for complex architecture. Which model to use for debugging. Which model to use for code generation. Most people pick one model and use it for everything. That's like using a sledgehammer to hang a picture frame. Model selection is strategy. And strategy is money. The people making $10K/month with Claude Code are strategic about every credit they spend. You're burning through credits because you use the most expensive model to write a hello world. ↓ 11. Use Git and Version Control. If you're not using version control, you're one mistake away from losing everything. Claude Code integrates with Git. Every change tracked. Every version saved. Every mistake reversible. Without Git: Claude makes a change. It breaks something. You can't undo it. You start over. 3 hours wasted. With Git: Claude makes a change. It breaks something. You roll back in 5 seconds. Keep working. Version control isn't optional. It's insurance. And the people not using it are the same people who say "I lost my entire project" like it's something that just happens. It doesn't just happen. It happens because you didn't set up Git. The video walks through the entire Git integration. Save this post. Follow Himanshu Kumar for the Git workflow that's saved every project I've ever built. ↓ 12. Set Up Claude MD and Memory. This is the feature that makes Claude Code feel like a real team member instead of a stranger you explain everything to every time. ClaudeMD is a memory file. You tell Claude Code about your project once. It remembers forever. Coding style preferences. Project architecture decisions. Technology stack. File naming conventions. Business logic rules. Without ClaudeMD: Every new conversation starts from zero. You explain the same things repeatedly. Output is inconsistent. With ClaudeMD: Claude knows your project. Claude follows your rules. Claude produces consistent, professional code. The difference between a sloppy freelancer and a reliable agency is consistency. Claude. MD gives you consistency without the agency overhead. Most people don't set this up and wonder why Claude Code gives different answers every time. ↓ 13. Automate with Tasks. This is where Claude Code stops being a tool and starts being an employee. Tasks let you define repeating workflows. "Every time I push code, run tests." "Every time I create a new file, add boilerplate." "Every time I start a session, check for errors." Automated. Hands-free. Consistent. You're doing these things manually every single day. The same checks. The same steps. The same routine. Tasks do them automatically. So you can focus on the work that actually makes money. Every manual task you automate is time you get back. And time is the only thing you can never make more of. Save this post. Follow Himanshu Kumar for the task automation templates that run my entire workflow. ↓ 14. Explore Features Most People Never Touch. The video covers features that 95% of Claude Code users don't know exist. Because they watched a 3-minute TikTok about Claude Code and think they're experts now. They're not. They're using 5% of a tool that can do everything. The full tutorial goes deep into features that most tutorials skip because they're "too advanced." They're not too advanced. They're too valuable for lazy creators to bother explaining. This video explains all of them. Clearly. For beginners. The 5% of features you don't know about are the 5% that make people rich. ↓ Let's zoom out. I just broke down 14 sections of Claude Code. Setup and installation. Desktop app. Dependencies. Code editor integration. Basic usage. Commands. Modes and shortcuts. Planning prompts. Model selection. Git and version control. Memory and Claude. MD. Tasks and automation. Advanced features. All in one video. All free. All beginner friendly. The person who masters even half of these in the next 2 weeks will be in the top 1% of Claude Code users. The top 1% of Claude Code users are the ones charging $5,000-$10,000 per project and building them in a single afternoon. Everyone else is asking ChatGPT to fix their resume. Same tools. Same access. Completely different outcomes. Because one person treats AI like a toy. And the other treats it like a business. ↓ Here's the hard truth nobody wants to hear. You don't have a talent problem. You don't have an intelligence problem. You don't have a resources problem. You have an action problem. Everything I just listed has a free tutorial right here in the attached video. 33 minutes. That's it. 33 minutes to learn the tool that people are using to build $5,000-$20,000/month businesses. You spent more time today scrolling Twitter than it takes to watch this video. You spent more time this week watching Netflix than it takes to master Claude Code basics. You spent more time this month doing nothing than it would take to completely change your income. The information is free. The tool is accessible. The opportunity is here. The only thing missing is you caring enough to start. ↓ CANCEL your plans this week. This isn't optional anymore. The people learning Claude Code right now will be building apps for the people who didn't learn it. That's not a prediction. That's already happening. Companies are replacing $150/hour developers with one person and Claude Code. If you code: learn Claude Code or become half as valuable by next year. If you don't code: learn Claude Code or miss the biggest opportunity to start earning from tech without a CS degree. There's no path forward that doesn't include AI coding tools. None. You have one window. Right now. This week. ↓ Here's your action plan for the next 7 days: Day 1: Watch the full video. Install Claude Code. Set up dependencies. Day 2: Learn basic usage. Try 5 different commands. Day 3: Write your first planning prompt. Build a small project. Day 4: Set up Claude. MD. Configure your memory file. Day 5: Master modes and shortcuts. Build a second project faster. Day 6: Set up Git integration. Automate with tasks. Day 7: Build something real. A tool, an app, a website. Ship it. 7 days. One tool. One completely different skill set. One completely different income potential. Or 7 more days of scrolling Twitter watching other people build things while you "plan to start." Your call. ↓ This is the most important video you'll watch this year. 33 minutes. Complete Claude Code mastery. From zero to building real projects. Save this post. Come back to it every single day this week. Check off each section as you complete it. Follow Himanshu Kumarfor daily Claude Code breakdowns, advanced tutorials, and the exact workflows that are turning beginners into $10K/month builders. The only thing between you and $10K/month with Claude Code is this video and 7 days. Don't waste them. You Must Follow me Himanshu Kumar, so i can send you DM.

Himanshu Kumar

85,668 views • 4 months ago

CANCEL Your Weekend Plans, and Learn Claude Code Today. $5,000/month. $10,000/month. $20,000/month. People are building entire apps and charging clients thousands using Claude Code. You're still Googling 'how to center a div.' While you're binge-watching a show you won't remember next week, a 19 year old with zero coding experience just built a $5,000 SaaS product in one afternoon using the tool I'm about to break down. Same laptop. Same internet. Same 24 hours. He has Claude Code. You have Netflix. That's the only difference. This YouTube video is a goldmine. Full Claude Code tutorial. Beginner to pro. Every feature. Every setup step. Every best practice. Zero prior knowledge needed. Save it. Watch it tonight. Not tomorrow. Tonight. Save this post. This is your complete Claude Code roadmap. Lose it and you lose the next 12 months of income. Follow Himanshu Kumar so you don't miss the breakdowns for each feature. ↓ 1. Understand What Claude Code Actually Is. You think Claude Code is just another chatbot. It's not. And that misunderstanding is why you're broke. ChatGPT gives you text. Claude Code gives you software. It runs in your terminal. It reads your entire codebase. It writes files directly to your project. It runs commands on your machine. It debugs errors autonomously. It builds features end to end. You're not chatting. You're deploying a developer. One that works 24/7. Never asks for a raise. Never calls in sick. Never pushes broken code at 5 PM on a Friday. People are charging clients $5,000-$10,000 for apps they built with Claude Code in 3 hours. And you didn't even know this tool existed because you're still asking ChatGPT to write you a to-do list. The gap between you and people making money with AI isn't intelligence. It's awareness. Now you're aware. Save this post. Follow Himanshu Kumar for the complete breakdown of every Claude Code feature. ↓ 2. Set Up Claude Code Properly. Most people quit here. "It's too complicated." "I don't know terminal." "I'll set it up later." Later never comes. And "complicated" means "I watched for 30 seconds and gave up." The setup takes 10 minutes. Install Node.js. Install Claude Code via npm. Authenticate your account. Open your terminal. Done. 10 minutes. You spent longer this morning deciding what to have for breakfast. The video walks through every single click. Every command. Every screen. Assuming you know absolutely nothing. If you can download an app on your phone, you can set up Claude Code. It's the same level of difficulty. But you'll still tell yourself it's "too technical" because that excuse is more comfortable than admitting you're just scared to try something new. This is the setup that everything else builds on. Skip it and nothing works. ↓ 3. Use the Desktop App. You don't even need to live in the terminal if you don't want to. Claude Code has a desktop app. Clean interface. Visual feedback. Everything you need without touching command line. But here's the thing most people don't know: The desktop app isn't just a pretty wrapper. It lets you manage projects visually. See file changes in real time. Switch between projects instantly. The people making money with Claude Code use the desktop app for client projects because it's faster to manage multiple builds simultaneously. You're still opening 14 browser tabs to organize one project. They open one app and everything's there. Efficiency isn't a personality trait. It's a tool choice. Save this post. Follow Himanshu Kumar for the desktop app workflow that handles 5 client projects at once. ↓ 4. Install the Right Dependencies. This is where beginners silently fail and blame the tool. Claude Code needs certain dependencies installed to work properly. Miss one and everything breaks. Then you go on Twitter and say "Claude Code doesn't work." It works fine. You just didn't read the setup guide. The video covers every dependency you need. What to install. How to install it. How to verify it's working. No guessing. No Stack Overflow rabbit holes at midnight. No "why isn't this working" for 3 hours. Watch the dependency section once. Follow every step. Never deal with setup issues again. You spent more time last week troubleshooting a printer than this takes. ↓ 5. Work Inside Your Code Editor. Claude Code integrates directly with your code editor. VS Code. Cursor. Whatever you use. It's not a separate window you alt-tab between. It's right there. In your workflow. You type a request. Claude writes the code. The code appears in your editor. You review it. Accept it. Done. No copy pasting between windows. No reformatting code that got mangled in transit. No "which version was the right one." It's like pair programming with someone who never gets distracted, never argues about naming conventions, and actually writes code that works on the first try. Your current coding process is: Google the problem, read 5 answers on Stack Overflow, copy the wrong one, debug for an hour, find the right one, paste it in, break something else, repeat. Claude Code's process is: describe what you want, get working code, move on with your life. Same hour. One method produces working software. The other produces frustration and a browser history full of Stack Overflow tabs. Stop coding the hard way. Save this post. Follow Himanshu Kumar for code editor setup guides and integration tips. ↓ 6. Master Basic Usage. Most people learn 5% of a tool and say they "know" it. You "know" Photoshop because you can crop an image. You "know" Excel because you can sum a column. You "know" Claude Code because you asked it one question. Basic usage means: How to give Claude Code context about your project. How to ask for changes to existing code. How to generate new files and features. How to review what Claude produces. How to iterate when the output isn't perfect. These basics are the foundation of everything. Skip them and every advanced feature feels confusing. Master them and every advanced feature feels obvious. The video breaks down each one with real examples. Not theory. Actual usage on actual projects. You've been using AI tools at 5% capacity and wondering why your results are 5% of what others get. Save this post. Follow Himanshu Kumar for daily Claude Code usage tips. ↓ 7. Learn Every Command. Claude Code has commands that most users never discover. Because most users type one message and expect magic. That's not how professionals use it. Professionals use specific commands that tell Claude Code exactly what to do, how to do it, and what constraints to follow. The difference between a beginner and someone making $10K/month with Claude Code is knowing which command to use and when. The video walks through every single one. Not just what they do. But when to use each one. And why one command is better than another for specific situations. You've been using Claude Code like a hammer. These commands turn it into a full toolbox. Stop treating a power tool like a blunt instrument. Save this post. Follow Himanshu Kumar for the command cheat sheet I use daily. ↓ 8. Understand Modes and Shortcuts. Speed matters. The person who builds an app in 2 hours charges $5,000. The person who builds the same app in 2 days charges $2,000. Same app. Same quality. Different speed. Different income. Claude Code has modes that change how it operates. And shortcuts that cut your workflow time in half. Most people don't know either exists. They use Claude Code in default mode for everything. Like driving a car in first gear on the highway. Technically it works. But everyone is passing you. The video shows you every mode. Every shortcut. Every time-saving trick that separates the people charging $2,000 per project from the people charging $10,000. Speed is money. Literally. Save this post. Follow Himanshu Kumar for the shortcuts that cut my build time by 60%. ↓ 9. Write a Proper Planning Prompt. This is the section that separates amateurs from professionals. And it's the section most people skip. A planning prompt tells Claude Code what you're building before you start building it. Architecture. File structure. Technologies. Features. Constraints. Edge cases. Without a planning prompt, Claude Code guesses. And guessing produces garbage. With a planning prompt, Claude Code executes a clear plan. And clear plans produce working software. The video shows you exactly how to write a planning prompt that makes Claude Code produce professional-grade output on the first try. "But I just want to start coding." That's why your code breaks every time. That's why you restart projects 4 times. That's why nothing you build ever gets finished. Because you refuse to plan. A 5-minute planning prompt saves you 5 hours of debugging. But you'd rather skip the 5 minutes and suffer through the 5 hours because patience isn't your thing. And that's exactly why you're not making money. Planning is the most underpaid skill in coding. And the most overpaid when you master it. Save this post. Follow Himanshu Kumar for the planning prompt templates I use for every client project. ↓ 10. Choose the Right Model. Claude Code lets you select different AI models. Not all models are the same. Not all tasks need the same model. Using the most powerful model for a simple task wastes credits. Using a basic model for a complex task wastes time. The video explains: Which model to use for quick fixes. Which model to use for complex architecture. Which model to use for debugging. Which model to use for code generation. Most people pick one model and use it for everything. That's like using a sledgehammer to hang a picture frame. Model selection is strategy. And strategy is money. The people making $10K/month with Claude Code are strategic about every credit they spend. You're burning through credits because you use the most expensive model to write a hello world. ↓ 11. Use Git and Version Control. If you're not using version control, you're one mistake away from losing everything. Claude Code integrates with Git. Every change tracked. Every version saved. Every mistake reversible. Without Git: Claude makes a change. It breaks something. You can't undo it. You start over. 3 hours wasted. With Git: Claude makes a change. It breaks something. You roll back in 5 seconds. Keep working. Version control isn't optional. It's insurance. And the people not using it are the same people who say "I lost my entire project" like it's something that just happens. It doesn't just happen. It happens because you didn't set up Git. The video walks through the entire Git integration. Save this post. Follow Himanshu Kumar for the Git workflow that's saved every project I've ever built. ↓ 12. Set Up Claude.MD and Memory. This is the feature that makes Claude Code feel like a real team member instead of a stranger you explain everything to every time. ClaudeMD is a memory file. You tell Claude Code about your project once. It remembers forever. Coding style preferences. Project architecture decisions. Technology stack. File naming conventions. Business logic rules. Without ClaudeMD: Every new conversation starts from zero. You explain the same things repeatedly. Output is inconsistent. With ClaudeMD: Claude knows your project. Claude follows your rules. Claude produces consistent, professional code. The difference between a sloppy freelancer and a reliable agency is consistency. Claude. MD gives you consistency without the agency overhead. Most people don't set this up and wonder why Claude Code gives different answers every time. ↓ 13. Automate with Tasks. This is where Claude Code stops being a tool and starts being an employee. Tasks let you define repeating workflows. "Every time I push code, run tests." "Every time I create a new file, add boilerplate." "Every time I start a session, check for errors." Automated. Hands-free. Consistent. You're doing these things manually every single day. The same checks. The same steps. The same routine. Tasks do them automatically. So you can focus on the work that actually makes money. Every manual task you automate is time you get back. And time is the only thing you can never make more of. Save this post. Follow Himanshu Kumar for the task automation templates that run my entire workflow. ↓ 14. Explore Features Most People Never Touch. The video covers features that 95% of Claude Code users don't know exist. Because they watched a 3-minute TikTok about Claude Code and think they're experts now. They're not. They're using 5% of a tool that can do everything. The full tutorial goes deep into features that most tutorials skip because they're "too advanced." They're not too advanced. They're too valuable for lazy creators to bother explaining. This video explains all of them. Clearly. For beginners. The 5% of features you don't know about are the 5% that make people rich. ↓ Let's zoom out. I just broke down 14 sections of Claude Code. Setup and installation. Desktop app. Dependencies. Code editor integration. Basic usage. Commands. Modes and shortcuts. Planning prompts. Model selection. Git and version control. Memory and Claude. MD. Tasks and automation. Advanced features. All in one video. All free. All beginner friendly. The person who masters even half of these in the next 2 weeks will be in the top 1% of Claude Code users. The top 1% of Claude Code users are the ones charging $5,000-$10,000 per project and building them in a single afternoon. Everyone else is asking ChatGPT to fix their resume. Same tools. Same access. Completely different outcomes. Because one person treats AI like a toy. And the other treats it like a business. ↓ Here's the hard truth nobody wants to hear. You don't have a talent problem. You don't have an intelligence problem. You don't have a resources problem. You have an action problem. Everything I just listed has a free tutorial right here in the attached video. 33 minutes. That's it. 33 minutes to learn the tool that people are using to build $5,000-$20,000/month businesses. You spent more time today scrolling Twitter than it takes to watch this video. You spent more time this week watching Netflix than it takes to master Claude Code basics. You spent more time this month doing nothing than it would take to completely change your income. The information is free. The tool is accessible. The opportunity is here. The only thing missing is you caring enough to start. ↓ CANCEL your plans this week. This isn't optional anymore. The people learning Claude Code right now will be building apps for the people who didn't learn it. That's not a prediction. That's already happening. Companies are replacing $150/hour developers with one person and Claude Code. If you code: learn Claude Code or become half as valuable by next year. If you don't code: learn Claude Code or miss the biggest opportunity to start earning from tech without a CS degree. There's no path forward that doesn't include AI coding tools. None. You have one window. Right now. This week. ↓ Here's your action plan for the next 7 days: Day 1: Watch the full video. Install Claude Code. Set up dependencies. Day 2: Learn basic usage. Try 5 different commands. Day 3: Write your first planning prompt. Build a small project. Day 4: Set up Claude. MD. Configure your memory file. Day 5: Master modes and shortcuts. Build a second project faster. Day 6: Set up Git integration. Automate with tasks. Day 7: Build something real. A tool, an app, a website. Ship it. 7 days. One tool. One completely different skill set. One completely different income potential. Or 7 more days of scrolling Twitter watching other people build things while you "plan to start." Your call. ↓ This is the most important video you'll watch this year. 33 minutes. Complete Claude Code mastery. From zero to building real projects. Save this post. Come back to it every single day this week. Check off each section as you complete it. Follow Himanshu Kumar for daily Claude Code breakdowns, advanced tutorials, and the exact workflows that are turning beginners into $10K/month builders. The only thing between you and $10K/month with Claude Code is this video and 7 days. Don't waste them. You Must Follow me Himanshu Kumar, so i can send you DM.
35:48

CANCEL Your Weekend Plans, and Learn Claude Code Today. $5,000/month. $10,000/month. $20,000/month. People are building entire apps and charging clients thousands using Claude Code. You're still Googling 'how to center a div.' While you're binge-watching a show you won't remember next week, a 19 year old with zero coding experience just built a $5,000 SaaS product in one afternoon using the tool I'm about to break down. Same laptop. Same internet. Same 24 hours. He has Claude Code. You have Netflix. That's the only difference. This YouTube video is a goldmine. Full Claude Code tutorial. Beginner to pro. Every feature. Every setup step. Every best practice. Zero prior knowledge needed. Save it. Watch it tonight. Not tomorrow. Tonight. Save this post. This is your complete Claude Code roadmap. Lose it and you lose the next 12 months of income. Follow Himanshu Kumar so you don't miss the breakdowns for each feature. ↓ 1. Understand What Claude Code Actually Is. You think Claude Code is just another chatbot. It's not. And that misunderstanding is why you're broke. ChatGPT gives you text. Claude Code gives you software. It runs in your terminal. It reads your entire codebase. It writes files directly to your project. It runs commands on your machine. It debugs errors autonomously. It builds features end to end. You're not chatting. You're deploying a developer. One that works 24/7. Never asks for a raise. Never calls in sick. Never pushes broken code at 5 PM on a Friday. People are charging clients $5,000-$10,000 for apps they built with Claude Code in 3 hours. And you didn't even know this tool existed because you're still asking ChatGPT to write you a to-do list. The gap between you and people making money with AI isn't intelligence. It's awareness. Now you're aware. Save this post. Follow Himanshu Kumar for the complete breakdown of every Claude Code feature. ↓ 2. Set Up Claude Code Properly. Most people quit here. "It's too complicated." "I don't know terminal." "I'll set it up later." Later never comes. And "complicated" means "I watched for 30 seconds and gave up." The setup takes 10 minutes. Install Node.js. Install Claude Code via npm. Authenticate your account. Open your terminal. Done. 10 minutes. You spent longer this morning deciding what to have for breakfast. The video walks through every single click. Every command. Every screen. Assuming you know absolutely nothing. If you can download an app on your phone, you can set up Claude Code. It's the same level of difficulty. But you'll still tell yourself it's "too technical" because that excuse is more comfortable than admitting you're just scared to try something new. This is the setup that everything else builds on. Skip it and nothing works. ↓ 3. Use the Desktop App. You don't even need to live in the terminal if you don't want to. Claude Code has a desktop app. Clean interface. Visual feedback. Everything you need without touching command line. But here's the thing most people don't know: The desktop app isn't just a pretty wrapper. It lets you manage projects visually. See file changes in real time. Switch between projects instantly. The people making money with Claude Code use the desktop app for client projects because it's faster to manage multiple builds simultaneously. You're still opening 14 browser tabs to organize one project. They open one app and everything's there. Efficiency isn't a personality trait. It's a tool choice. Save this post. Follow Himanshu Kumar for the desktop app workflow that handles 5 client projects at once. ↓ 4. Install the Right Dependencies. This is where beginners silently fail and blame the tool. Claude Code needs certain dependencies installed to work properly. Miss one and everything breaks. Then you go on Twitter and say "Claude Code doesn't work." It works fine. You just didn't read the setup guide. The video covers every dependency you need. What to install. How to install it. How to verify it's working. No guessing. No Stack Overflow rabbit holes at midnight. No "why isn't this working" for 3 hours. Watch the dependency section once. Follow every step. Never deal with setup issues again. You spent more time last week troubleshooting a printer than this takes. ↓ 5. Work Inside Your Code Editor. Claude Code integrates directly with your code editor. VS Code. Cursor. Whatever you use. It's not a separate window you alt-tab between. It's right there. In your workflow. You type a request. Claude writes the code. The code appears in your editor. You review it. Accept it. Done. No copy pasting between windows. No reformatting code that got mangled in transit. No "which version was the right one." It's like pair programming with someone who never gets distracted, never argues about naming conventions, and actually writes code that works on the first try. Your current coding process is: Google the problem, read 5 answers on Stack Overflow, copy the wrong one, debug for an hour, find the right one, paste it in, break something else, repeat. Claude Code's process is: describe what you want, get working code, move on with your life. Same hour. One method produces working software. The other produces frustration and a browser history full of Stack Overflow tabs. Stop coding the hard way. Save this post. Follow Himanshu Kumar for code editor setup guides and integration tips. ↓ 6. Master Basic Usage. Most people learn 5% of a tool and say they "know" it. You "know" Photoshop because you can crop an image. You "know" Excel because you can sum a column. You "know" Claude Code because you asked it one question. Basic usage means: How to give Claude Code context about your project. How to ask for changes to existing code. How to generate new files and features. How to review what Claude produces. How to iterate when the output isn't perfect. These basics are the foundation of everything. Skip them and every advanced feature feels confusing. Master them and every advanced feature feels obvious. The video breaks down each one with real examples. Not theory. Actual usage on actual projects. You've been using AI tools at 5% capacity and wondering why your results are 5% of what others get. Save this post. Follow Himanshu Kumar for daily Claude Code usage tips. ↓ 7. Learn Every Command. Claude Code has commands that most users never discover. Because most users type one message and expect magic. That's not how professionals use it. Professionals use specific commands that tell Claude Code exactly what to do, how to do it, and what constraints to follow. The difference between a beginner and someone making $10K/month with Claude Code is knowing which command to use and when. The video walks through every single one. Not just what they do. But when to use each one. And why one command is better than another for specific situations. You've been using Claude Code like a hammer. These commands turn it into a full toolbox. Stop treating a power tool like a blunt instrument. Save this post. Follow Himanshu Kumar for the command cheat sheet I use daily. ↓ 8. Understand Modes and Shortcuts. Speed matters. The person who builds an app in 2 hours charges $5,000. The person who builds the same app in 2 days charges $2,000. Same app. Same quality. Different speed. Different income. Claude Code has modes that change how it operates. And shortcuts that cut your workflow time in half. Most people don't know either exists. They use Claude Code in default mode for everything. Like driving a car in first gear on the highway. Technically it works. But everyone is passing you. The video shows you every mode. Every shortcut. Every time-saving trick that separates the people charging $2,000 per project from the people charging $10,000. Speed is money. Literally. Save this post. Follow Himanshu Kumar for the shortcuts that cut my build time by 60%. ↓ 9. Write a Proper Planning Prompt. This is the section that separates amateurs from professionals. And it's the section most people skip. A planning prompt tells Claude Code what you're building before you start building it. Architecture. File structure. Technologies. Features. Constraints. Edge cases. Without a planning prompt, Claude Code guesses. And guessing produces garbage. With a planning prompt, Claude Code executes a clear plan. And clear plans produce working software. The video shows you exactly how to write a planning prompt that makes Claude Code produce professional-grade output on the first try. "But I just want to start coding." That's why your code breaks every time. That's why you restart projects 4 times. That's why nothing you build ever gets finished. Because you refuse to plan. A 5-minute planning prompt saves you 5 hours of debugging. But you'd rather skip the 5 minutes and suffer through the 5 hours because patience isn't your thing. And that's exactly why you're not making money. Planning is the most underpaid skill in coding. And the most overpaid when you master it. Save this post. Follow Himanshu Kumar for the planning prompt templates I use for every client project. ↓ 10. Choose the Right Model. Claude Code lets you select different AI models. Not all models are the same. Not all tasks need the same model. Using the most powerful model for a simple task wastes credits. Using a basic model for a complex task wastes time. The video explains: Which model to use for quick fixes. Which model to use for complex architecture. Which model to use for debugging. Which model to use for code generation. Most people pick one model and use it for everything. That's like using a sledgehammer to hang a picture frame. Model selection is strategy. And strategy is money. The people making $10K/month with Claude Code are strategic about every credit they spend. You're burning through credits because you use the most expensive model to write a hello world. ↓ 11. Use Git and Version Control. If you're not using version control, you're one mistake away from losing everything. Claude Code integrates with Git. Every change tracked. Every version saved. Every mistake reversible. Without Git: Claude makes a change. It breaks something. You can't undo it. You start over. 3 hours wasted. With Git: Claude makes a change. It breaks something. You roll back in 5 seconds. Keep working. Version control isn't optional. It's insurance. And the people not using it are the same people who say "I lost my entire project" like it's something that just happens. It doesn't just happen. It happens because you didn't set up Git. The video walks through the entire Git integration. Save this post. Follow Himanshu Kumar for the Git workflow that's saved every project I've ever built. ↓ 12. Set Up Claude.MD and Memory. This is the feature that makes Claude Code feel like a real team member instead of a stranger you explain everything to every time. ClaudeMD is a memory file. You tell Claude Code about your project once. It remembers forever. Coding style preferences. Project architecture decisions. Technology stack. File naming conventions. Business logic rules. Without ClaudeMD: Every new conversation starts from zero. You explain the same things repeatedly. Output is inconsistent. With ClaudeMD: Claude knows your project. Claude follows your rules. Claude produces consistent, professional code. The difference between a sloppy freelancer and a reliable agency is consistency. Claude. MD gives you consistency without the agency overhead. Most people don't set this up and wonder why Claude Code gives different answers every time. ↓ 13. Automate with Tasks. This is where Claude Code stops being a tool and starts being an employee. Tasks let you define repeating workflows. "Every time I push code, run tests." "Every time I create a new file, add boilerplate." "Every time I start a session, check for errors." Automated. Hands-free. Consistent. You're doing these things manually every single day. The same checks. The same steps. The same routine. Tasks do them automatically. So you can focus on the work that actually makes money. Every manual task you automate is time you get back. And time is the only thing you can never make more of. Save this post. Follow Himanshu Kumar for the task automation templates that run my entire workflow. ↓ 14. Explore Features Most People Never Touch. The video covers features that 95% of Claude Code users don't know exist. Because they watched a 3-minute TikTok about Claude Code and think they're experts now. They're not. They're using 5% of a tool that can do everything. The full tutorial goes deep into features that most tutorials skip because they're "too advanced." They're not too advanced. They're too valuable for lazy creators to bother explaining. This video explains all of them. Clearly. For beginners. The 5% of features you don't know about are the 5% that make people rich. ↓ Let's zoom out. I just broke down 14 sections of Claude Code. Setup and installation. Desktop app. Dependencies. Code editor integration. Basic usage. Commands. Modes and shortcuts. Planning prompts. Model selection. Git and version control. Memory and Claude. MD. Tasks and automation. Advanced features. All in one video. All free. All beginner friendly. The person who masters even half of these in the next 2 weeks will be in the top 1% of Claude Code users. The top 1% of Claude Code users are the ones charging $5,000-$10,000 per project and building them in a single afternoon. Everyone else is asking ChatGPT to fix their resume. Same tools. Same access. Completely different outcomes. Because one person treats AI like a toy. And the other treats it like a business. ↓ Here's the hard truth nobody wants to hear. You don't have a talent problem. You don't have an intelligence problem. You don't have a resources problem. You have an action problem. Everything I just listed has a free tutorial right here in the attached video. 33 minutes. That's it. 33 minutes to learn the tool that people are using to build $5,000-$20,000/month businesses. You spent more time today scrolling Twitter than it takes to watch this video. You spent more time this week watching Netflix than it takes to master Claude Code basics. You spent more time this month doing nothing than it would take to completely change your income. The information is free. The tool is accessible. The opportunity is here. The only thing missing is you caring enough to start. ↓ CANCEL your plans this week. This isn't optional anymore. The people learning Claude Code right now will be building apps for the people who didn't learn it. That's not a prediction. That's already happening. Companies are replacing $150/hour developers with one person and Claude Code. If you code: learn Claude Code or become half as valuable by next year. If you don't code: learn Claude Code or miss the biggest opportunity to start earning from tech without a CS degree. There's no path forward that doesn't include AI coding tools. None. You have one window. Right now. This week. ↓ Here's your action plan for the next 7 days: Day 1: Watch the full video. Install Claude Code. Set up dependencies. Day 2: Learn basic usage. Try 5 different commands. Day 3: Write your first planning prompt. Build a small project. Day 4: Set up Claude. MD. Configure your memory file. Day 5: Master modes and shortcuts. Build a second project faster. Day 6: Set up Git integration. Automate with tasks. Day 7: Build something real. A tool, an app, a website. Ship it. 7 days. One tool. One completely different skill set. One completely different income potential. Or 7 more days of scrolling Twitter watching other people build things while you "plan to start." Your call. ↓ This is the most important video you'll watch this year. 33 minutes. Complete Claude Code mastery. From zero to building real projects. Save this post. Come back to it every single day this week. Check off each section as you complete it. Follow Himanshu Kumar for daily Claude Code breakdowns, advanced tutorials, and the exact workflows that are turning beginners into $10K/month builders. The only thing between you and $10K/month with Claude Code is this video and 7 days. Don't waste them. You Must Follow me Himanshu Kumar, so i can send you DM.

Himanshu Kumar

101,793 views • 5 months ago

"If [Ross] had phrased it like that in the N2K segment, I think most people wouldn't have pushed back so hard." ~Murgia Lockheed, Landing Drones, Stupor, and Trump Did think this would be another LAP (Long-Ass Post), but here it is. Ross Coulthart: "It's been a very interesting week with the public response to the comments that I've made on the show that I do with my friend and colleague,Bryce Zabel, "Need to Know," where we discussed what I've been told by my sources, multiple sources, by the way, that Lockheed Martin was indeed behind the Tic Tac encounter of 2004 with the USS Nimitz battle carrier group." Let's rewind: This is what Ross and Bryce said on the @Coulthart_Zabel episode uploaded on July 6th. My comments in ( ). Ross: "I now know, categorically, that the Tic Tac is Lockheed Martin technology. Categorically." Bryce: "Ooookay." Ross: "The Tic Tac is Lockheed Martin technology. Why are we being lied to? This is the issue. Why is the United States government now participating - at White-House, executive level, in collusion with the national-security state - to keep secret the fact that they've made these advances? I suspect it's because they've realized that they're being overtaken by their foreign adversaries, and they don't want you to know that." Bryce: "Okay, the Tic Tac is Lockheed Martin. Well, in some respects, given how insane the Tic Tac behaved during the Nimitz, where it went from 80,000 feet to sea level in less than a second, then I would say, well there's one for the U.S. team. Obviously, we have some good stuff out there, if that's the case, right?" Ross: "How much of that is being shared with the actual Defense Department that's responsible for the defense of the United States? This is the kind of questions that Congress should be asking." Bryce: "So you're saying Lockheed Martin might - or anybody, but Lockheed Martin in this particular case - has a Tic Tac that they are testing, and have been testing, and have access to." (One can argue that when Bryce said LM has a Tic Tac that they've been testing, that could include the possibility that it's an NHI craft they somehow acquired and not something they built. That would go against my "Ross is flip flopping" allegation.) Bryce: "But they might not have shared it with the Defense Department of the United States? Which probably paid for it in their trillion-dollar budgets. That's kind of mind-blowing in itself." Ross: "Those are the questions I think Congress should be asking. I mean, what I'm saying, basically, is..." Bryce: "Why are you saying this, by the way? Where did you? Where is this from? How do we know this? What's going on?" Ross: "I'm...I'm sorry, Bryce, I can't go there." ~ Bryce: "Frankly, the only major row that you and I have ever had, which was over eminent domain, and who can... Is it not possible that that legislation has eminent domain in it as an issue that the government would be able to go seize potential things from private enterprise, if the government, in fact, thought that Lockheed Martin had a Tic Tac? Wouldn't we want to go seize it?" Ross: "Bloody hell we would. Exactly. But that hasn't happened. And, you know, I can tell you, David Grusch has told them exactly where to look. Jake Barber has told them exactly where to look. This is why I just found it, in many ways, I find it absurd that we're still debating the issue whether the NHI technology recovery is real. Of course it's real!" (I think/suspect it's real. But if I'm gonna play journalist, I need to see proof before I say, "Of course it's real!" Or, "I know it's real." Walk me into the building and show me. I don't think this has happened with Ross so a debate is still warranted, IMO.) Bryce: "This thing you just said about Lockheed Martin. Is this the first time you've said that in public, or have you said that before?" Ross: "Look, there's been speculation for a while that it's Lockheed Martin, but I'm now very, very sure that it was Lockheed Martin. And I think the Tic Tac is part of two, at least two different platforms that Lockheed's been working on. Different platforms that they've been working on. And it's technology that, until very recently, most of Congress was completely unaware of." (To me, that sounds like Ross is saying, that whatever LM is working on, they built it.) Bryce: "Well, I just hope, if there's a war with China or a war with NHI, I just hope Lockheed Martin remembers who helped pay for it, and they're on our side. That's what I would say." Ross: "Well, I hope they are. I don't think we can have any expectation, though, unless the public demands answers, that we're going to get the truth." Full post here: ~And more from yesterday's "Reality Check"~ @MeaganOurada reads a question: "You recently mentioned the Tic Tac was a produced/manufactured by Lockheed Martin, but you never mentioned if it was under autonomous flight or piloted." (This shows that others took Ross's original comments as LM manufacturing a Tic Tac and not figuring out how to fly an NHI Tic Tac that they somehow had acquired.) Ross: "That's a good question, and I'll be honest with you, I don't know for sure." (Here was a chance for Ross to say, "I didn't mean to suggest it was 100% produced/manufactured by Lockheed, just that it was one possibility. The other is they operated a NHI Tic Tac that they had acquired.) Ross: "I have been told previously that when Tic Tacs... You see, one of the other things I want to clarify here as well is, there are NHI Tic Tacs." (We don't know that for sure, and later on, Ross adds that they are "suspected" to be NHI.) Ross: "A lot of people seem to be thinking that I'm suggesting that all Tic Tacs are Lockheed Martin. That's not the case at all." (A few people who follow me thought that but I think the overwhelming majority realize that Ross didn't say that.) Ross: "What I was told, and I'm reasonably sure that this is the case, is that Tic Tac was being operated by Lockheed Martin, and it's conceivable that that was being operated neuro-meditatively, psionically, by a human psionic, which is what I understand, is the way that these retrieved, non-human craft are being operated." ("Reasonably sure" and "operated," is different than what he said on N2K: "I now know, categorically, that the Tic Tac is Lockheed Martin technology. Categorically." I think most people took that as: "I now now, categorically, that Lockheed built a Tic Tac and that's what Fravor chased in 2004." That's why you saw such a pushback from people on social media.) Ross: "It's not clear to me, though, whether this is a craft that was built by Lockheed Martin, or whether it is Lockheed Martin testing the use of neuro-meditative signaling, as our friends at Skywatcher called it, to operate one of these craft. I just can't answer that question, specifically." (If Ross would have said this in the N2K episode and didn't use the word, "categorically," I think the reaction would have been, "Oh, that's interesting." I'm still skeptical that Lockheed has ANY role in the 2004 Tic Tac incident but I'll keep my mind open.) Ross: "All I can do is tell you what I've been told by my multiple sources, which is that the operation of the Tic Tac was being controlled, on the day, by Lockheed Martin." (Again, if he had phrased it like that in the N2K segment, I think most people wouldn't have pushed back so hard. I hope humans have developed the ability to control a Tic Tac and make it perform like what was reported on November 14th, 2004. But, again, I'm skeptical. The SPY-1 radar on the USS Princeton tracked objects for a week or so, leading up to the encounter Fravor and the others had with the Tic Tac. Were all of those objects LM-controlled craft? Seems unlikely. In 2019, at UFO MegaCon, Kevin Day said that on around November 10th, he started witnessing these strange tracks on his radar scope. He wasn’t really concerned with them because there was a lot of air traffic off the coast of California and they were a significant ways from the strike group. So they just monitored them and reporting them to 'higher authorities' and maintained track of them. They stood out and were anomalous because they were at 28,000 feet and going at 100 knots. Day said that was, 'extremely bizarre.' His entire job was to identify stuff and he had no idea what these were. None. Radar was shut down so they could do an extensive diagnostics to make sure it was working and these were real contacts. They were. ~ Just going through all the possibilities I can think of.... Did LM "hijack" or summon one of those craft, psychically, and "make it" have an encounter with Fravor and Friends? Or, maybe none of the above? Maybe it was a NHI craft and had nothing to do with LM? Remember, Fravor said it looked like it might be docking with a submerged object, so maybe that's why it was in that specific area? To me, that suggests NHI.) Ross: "Now I want to say here, let's be really clear about this: There is always the possibility that sources that talk to a journalist like me may be maligned. They may indeed be running some kind of psyop." (I know he has said that kind of thing in the past but I wish Ross had reiterated that point in the N2K segment. I have heard from a few people who think that's exactly what's happening here. And also, if his sources are so sure LM was involved and "operating" a Tic Tac, to me, it would make sense that they would also know whether it was a Tic Tac LM acquired or...a Tic Tac LM manufactured, based on reverse engineering the real thing.) Ross: "And of course I've taken that (disinformation/psyop) into consideration in asking the question. The difficulty is, I can't go into the detail, for very obvious reasons, about who these sources are and why I think so strongly that those sources are telling me the truth. And I can tell you, there are a lot of people who are assuring me that I'm flat wrong. And that's fine. But let's have a discussion about this." (Well now that "categorically" seems be to off the table, we can discuss it. BTW, back in 2019 on my blog, Dave Beaty 🇺🇦 and I discussed the possibility that the Tic Tac was human tech. I know others have discussed that, too, so it's not a new idea.) ~Ross then switches gears to the drones~ Ross: "And also, let's talk about what I think was actually another of the major points that I was trying to make in the course of that conversation I had with Bryce. Which is that there is an obvious contradiction between what the White House has said - that these were FAA-authorized drones operating [in] the continental United States in November, December, January - and what the U.S. Air Force has said. Which is two senior generals, one former, one serving commander of NORTHCOM, NORAD, responsible for the defense of the United States northern aerospace, stated categorically, on the record, that they have no idea who is responsible for those drone craft that were hovering over the continent of the United States. That's an obvious, logical contradiction." (In the March 16th episode of 60 Minutes with Bill Whitaker., we learned... Retired four-star general, Mark Kelly, went up to the roof and saw drones over Langley, from the size of a quadcopter up to the size of a small car. General Glen VanHerck (now retired) is the former commander of NORAD and NORTHCOM and told "60 Minutes" that we can't track the drones over Langley or see where they originated. "It's a capability gap. Certainly, they can come and go from any direction. The FBI is looking at potential options but they don't have an answer right now." General Gregory Guillot is the current commander of NORAD and NORTHCOM and told "60 Minutes," that, "the threat got ahead of our ability to detect and track the threat." Could we detect drones flying into Langley today? "At low altitude, probably not, with your standard FAA or surveillance radars. I don't think we know entirely what happened. It is alarming." And, as I've (Joe) been saying forever, a big problem was/is the rules of engagement that detail when and how you can shoot down drones. VanHerk: "It's been one year since Langley had their drone incursion and we don't have the policies and laws in place to deal with this? That's not a sense or urgency.") ~ Ross: "And if the president, think about this... If the president...it's actually a good point that actually supports the possibility that I might, in fact, be right, and that my sources are in fact telling me the truth. If the president is telling the American public they don't need to worry about these drones - drones which we know are operating anomalously, with anomalous characteristics - then what the hell is going on? It implies he's been briefed. (Okay, what Ross is saying here: If you combine the president telling us not to worry about the drones, along with these drones making anomalous maneuvers, it bolsters his claim that LM (and others) has advanced tech that can also be used in drone tech. And that the president has been briefed about this advanced tech. But the problem with that line of thinking is, when you look at what eyewitnesses have said about the drones (or whatever they were), in 99% of the cases, the only anomalous behavior was their ability avoid detection and go stealth. That's the low observability part of the UAP five observables that Lue Elizondo popularized. But no 90-degree turns or anything like that. I don't think anything the generals or Trump said bolsters the idea that Lockheed was involved with the Tic Tac in 2004.) Ross: "Just to add more smoke to the fire, earlier on today, I had a message from a guy in New Jersey who has seen one of these drones land in a New Jersey backyard. He was illegally pointing a laser beam at one of these drones, which you should not do. Naughty. Even if they are NHI or whatever they are." (I wish Ross had said, "a guy in New Jersey who CLAIMS he has seen one of these drones land." Ross was in Barcelona when recording this episode of Reality Check so there was no time for him to vet this story. It's such an outlier from everything else we have heard about the drones that I think we should remain skeptical about if it actually happened. Does this person have photos or videos? Are there any other eyewitnesses?) Ross: "This is what he told me: "I was beaming [the drones] one night around midnight, and the one flew straight over my backyard, stopped slightly above, and to my left, and seemed to sink down into the trees along the little street on the side of my house. The next thing I see is this rectangle-looking, box-like thing floating just above the street, about the size of an old Ford station wagon. It was the most incredible, starkly-lit thing I've ever seen. I've never seen colors so radiant, so intensely liquid-like in my life. Several shades of blues with oranges and yellows like intense neon lights. "'It scared the hell out of me, and I moved away from the window so it couldn't see me. I slowly poked my head around the window, and it followed every move I made. It knew I was watching it. I would pull back and it came up the street. I would move into the window and it moved back down the street. It was like we were synchronized, and I was completely freaked out to the point that I quickly ran into my kitchen and considered hiding under my sink, of all things. I found myself in some sort of stupor, like I was being drugged, confused and slowed down. So I went to my bedroom and got my point two five, and just laid back in bed. I awoke the next morning, still holding the pistol.' ~End Alleged Eyewitness Account in NJ~ Ross: "Something really anomalous that has no visible means of propulsion is landing in New Jersey, and your president is telling you he's not concerned about it. Yet, two generals responsible for the defense of the United States aerospace are telling you they're concerned about it, and they don't know what these objects are. Why is the president not concerned? And why are two U.S. Air Force generals, presumably, not briefed into what the president is briefed into? Think about that." (Allegedly landed in NJ. I don't think Trump knows more than the generals, and I don't think he was briefed into a program that they were left out in the cold on.) ~~~ @MeaganOurada reads another question: "Even if Ross seems confident that Tic Tac is U.S. tech, does he think it's a reverse engineering tech from NHI, or a tech 100% created by humans?" Ross: "As I've mentioned earlier, we're not saying all Tic Tacs are Lockheed Martin. And it's quite clear that some Tic Tacs are indeed non-human intelligence, or suspected to be non-human intelligence. But what we're talking about are objects that are showing the five observables, doing maneuvers and operating in ways that don't conform to terrestrial craft. "I can't answer the question, definitively, whether they are constructed by Lockheed Martin, or whether it's Lockheed Martin operating a recovered, retrieved craft." (Again, if he had said that in the N2K segment, there may have been less pushback. Did his sources not explain that aspect of the claim? Pretty important detail.) Ross: "Because what I've been told, and what jakebarber told me in the interview that you've all watched, hopefully, on NewsNation, is that there have been retrievals of craft, including Tic Tacs. So, why is it a surprise to people that a contractor, that I'm alleging is directly involved in the Legacy program, is involved in operating these craft." (Because when Ross spoke about this the first time, he made no mention of LM OPERATING the Tic Tac in the 2004 incident . If he didn't mean that Lockheed had BUILT or MANUFACTURED it, he should have made that clear. He must understand this.) Ross: "And moreover, why would we necessarily expect that people, even those flying in the carrier battle group, would actually know about this or be briefed into this?" (We didn't, and don't, expect that, and have been discussing it for the last 6 or so years.) Ross: "It would have been a really good idea if they were going to test this technology against the carrier battle group, to have let the people know." (Which people? How many? Fravor said they had around 6000 people on the Nimitz and Princeton, combined. If it was SAP-level, classified technology, they would've had to read all those people into the program before the test. Not realistic, IMO.) Ross: "And I think people need to be reminded that my good friend, Kevin Day, who I know disputes the possibility that the Tic Tac is Lockheed Martin... In my book, Kevin Day told me - and he said this in many, many interviews - that when, I think it was the admiral in charge of the carrier battle group, was told about the Tic Tac, he didn't seem very alarmed. Why not? Why aren't people asking these questions? Why was the commander of a carrier battle fleet - that was suffering incursions by anomalous objects doing the five observables during a hugely important and sensitive naval exercise - why wasn't he concerned about those craft? Think about it." (When I met Keven in 2019, he left the door slightly open to the possibility that it was our tech. And I can't find anything about an admiral onboard the Princeton in Ross's book, "In Plain Sight." The only thing that resembles that claim is this excerpt about the captain. I also wrote about the captain in my blog in 2019.) From In Plain Sight... Kevin Day recalls asking his captain on the Princeton afterwards what he thought the object was. 'He told me, “I think the objects were spontaneously forming ice falling from space”.’ Day laughs at the absurdity of such a conclusion. His captain left him with the clear impression he knew a lot more than he was letting on about the phenomenon." From My Blog in 2019... "November 14th, they’re doing air defense exercises, also known as ADEX. Day pulls Captain Smith aside and tells him about the contacts that he and the others had been tracking and that he’s worried about 'safety of flight' because they could have a mishap with one of these craft as they conduct their exercises. Day highly recommended that they go check them out. Smith agreed and told him to take the Fast Eagle flight and 'go get ‘em.' Day said, “in the back of my mind, I was like, hell yeah! We’re going to intercept these things!” (audience laughs) It turned out to be his very last intercept in the Navy." (So, apparently, the captain WAS concerned leading up to the encounter. More from my 2019 blog...) "Voorhis shared that his captain had started a rumor that the objects were spontaneously forming ice in the atmosphere. He said he and his buddies would all sit there, smoke and say, 'Yeah, right.'" (For me, none of that is enough to suggest that the captain knew LM or some other humans/military/USG were behind the Tic Tac events. Maybe the captain thought it was something alien but didn't want the sailors to lose focus for their upcoming role in Iraqi Freedom? Or, maybe he was scared of the possibility of a non-human intelligence among us? I don't know. I'm not positive, but I think Ryan Graves mentioned one of his superiors giving a muted reaction to some of the UAP events they were facing on the East Coast.) ~ "Commander David Fravor responded to me: the Tic Tac 'was not Lockheed Martin', according to him. He seemed very confident and matter-of-fact." ~Jesse Michels Ross: "Let me first say I have nothing but admiration for David Fravor. He's given service to his country, he's a patriot, and he deserves respect and recognition for that. I'm not getting involved in a stash with a person who's done so much, honorably, for his country. It's not, though, outside the realm of possibilities. In fact, I think it would be extremely unlikely that, if there is, as I know there is, a compartmented, secret program where Lockheed Martin is one of the primary contractors operating retrieved, non-human technology and attempting to reverse engineer that technology, there is absolutely no way that David would be briefed into that, unless it was absolutely necessary for the doing of his job." (I've been saying this for several years and I agree 100%.) Ross: "As we all know, when the government wants to protect a secret, it compartmentalizes it. Even if you have a Top-Secret classification - which I'm sure David probably had - it's also compartmentalized. And that's how the U.S. keeps its secrets. And I've spoken to people, literally in institutions in the United States, one of whom knows about the program, and the other of whom is in an adjoining office and has absolutely no idea. "I've had a situation where I've spoken to the head of a government agency that ought properly to have known about the Legacy program. That head of a government agency was not informed about the fact that we are recovering non-human craft and attempting to reverse engineer that technology." (Journalistically speaking, I would say, "The head of a government agency was not informed about the CLAIM that we are recovering non-human craft." No way for Ross to know that's a fact unless he's been read in to the program to see for himself. Belief? Yes. Knowing? No. I harp on this all the time and it's a pet peeve of mine because I think it's important.) Ross: "A person two rungs down was the person that the Legacy program was using to gate keep inside that institution. It's really interesting how they compartmentalize all of this. And so, absolutely no disrespect to David Fravor or my good friend, Kevin Day, but they're good men. The simple fact is, compartmentalization works." (Again, I agree 100%. If Admiral Wilson, the vice director of intelligence, and deputy director of the DIA, was denied access, then there's a very good chance David Fravor was, too.)
7:14

"If [Ross] had phrased it like that in the N2K segment, I think most people wouldn't have pushed back so hard." ~Murgia Lockheed, Landing Drones, Stupor, and Trump Did think this would be another LAP (Long-Ass Post), but here it is. Ross Coulthart: "It's been a very interesting week with the public response to the comments that I've made on the show that I do with my friend and colleague,Bryce Zabel, "Need to Know," where we discussed what I've been told by my sources, multiple sources, by the way, that Lockheed Martin was indeed behind the Tic Tac encounter of 2004 with the USS Nimitz battle carrier group." Let's rewind: This is what Ross and Bryce said on the @Coulthart_Zabel episode uploaded on July 6th. My comments in ( ). Ross: "I now know, categorically, that the Tic Tac is Lockheed Martin technology. Categorically." Bryce: "Ooookay." Ross: "The Tic Tac is Lockheed Martin technology. Why are we being lied to? This is the issue. Why is the United States government now participating - at White-House, executive level, in collusion with the national-security state - to keep secret the fact that they've made these advances? I suspect it's because they've realized that they're being overtaken by their foreign adversaries, and they don't want you to know that." Bryce: "Okay, the Tic Tac is Lockheed Martin. Well, in some respects, given how insane the Tic Tac behaved during the Nimitz, where it went from 80,000 feet to sea level in less than a second, then I would say, well there's one for the U.S. team. Obviously, we have some good stuff out there, if that's the case, right?" Ross: "How much of that is being shared with the actual Defense Department that's responsible for the defense of the United States? This is the kind of questions that Congress should be asking." Bryce: "So you're saying Lockheed Martin might - or anybody, but Lockheed Martin in this particular case - has a Tic Tac that they are testing, and have been testing, and have access to." (One can argue that when Bryce said LM has a Tic Tac that they've been testing, that could include the possibility that it's an NHI craft they somehow acquired and not something they built. That would go against my "Ross is flip flopping" allegation.) Bryce: "But they might not have shared it with the Defense Department of the United States? Which probably paid for it in their trillion-dollar budgets. That's kind of mind-blowing in itself." Ross: "Those are the questions I think Congress should be asking. I mean, what I'm saying, basically, is..." Bryce: "Why are you saying this, by the way? Where did you? Where is this from? How do we know this? What's going on?" Ross: "I'm...I'm sorry, Bryce, I can't go there." ~ Bryce: "Frankly, the only major row that you and I have ever had, which was over eminent domain, and who can... Is it not possible that that legislation has eminent domain in it as an issue that the government would be able to go seize potential things from private enterprise, if the government, in fact, thought that Lockheed Martin had a Tic Tac? Wouldn't we want to go seize it?" Ross: "Bloody hell we would. Exactly. But that hasn't happened. And, you know, I can tell you, David Grusch has told them exactly where to look. Jake Barber has told them exactly where to look. This is why I just found it, in many ways, I find it absurd that we're still debating the issue whether the NHI technology recovery is real. Of course it's real!" (I think/suspect it's real. But if I'm gonna play journalist, I need to see proof before I say, "Of course it's real!" Or, "I know it's real." Walk me into the building and show me. I don't think this has happened with Ross so a debate is still warranted, IMO.) Bryce: "This thing you just said about Lockheed Martin. Is this the first time you've said that in public, or have you said that before?" Ross: "Look, there's been speculation for a while that it's Lockheed Martin, but I'm now very, very sure that it was Lockheed Martin. And I think the Tic Tac is part of two, at least two different platforms that Lockheed's been working on. Different platforms that they've been working on. And it's technology that, until very recently, most of Congress was completely unaware of." (To me, that sounds like Ross is saying, that whatever LM is working on, they built it.) Bryce: "Well, I just hope, if there's a war with China or a war with NHI, I just hope Lockheed Martin remembers who helped pay for it, and they're on our side. That's what I would say." Ross: "Well, I hope they are. I don't think we can have any expectation, though, unless the public demands answers, that we're going to get the truth." Full post here: ~And more from yesterday's "Reality Check"~ @MeaganOurada reads a question: "You recently mentioned the Tic Tac was a produced/manufactured by Lockheed Martin, but you never mentioned if it was under autonomous flight or piloted." (This shows that others took Ross's original comments as LM manufacturing a Tic Tac and not figuring out how to fly an NHI Tic Tac that they somehow had acquired.) Ross: "That's a good question, and I'll be honest with you, I don't know for sure." (Here was a chance for Ross to say, "I didn't mean to suggest it was 100% produced/manufactured by Lockheed, just that it was one possibility. The other is they operated a NHI Tic Tac that they had acquired.) Ross: "I have been told previously that when Tic Tacs... You see, one of the other things I want to clarify here as well is, there are NHI Tic Tacs." (We don't know that for sure, and later on, Ross adds that they are "suspected" to be NHI.) Ross: "A lot of people seem to be thinking that I'm suggesting that all Tic Tacs are Lockheed Martin. That's not the case at all." (A few people who follow me thought that but I think the overwhelming majority realize that Ross didn't say that.) Ross: "What I was told, and I'm reasonably sure that this is the case, is that Tic Tac was being operated by Lockheed Martin, and it's conceivable that that was being operated neuro-meditatively, psionically, by a human psionic, which is what I understand, is the way that these retrieved, non-human craft are being operated." ("Reasonably sure" and "operated," is different than what he said on N2K: "I now know, categorically, that the Tic Tac is Lockheed Martin technology. Categorically." I think most people took that as: "I now now, categorically, that Lockheed built a Tic Tac and that's what Fravor chased in 2004." That's why you saw such a pushback from people on social media.) Ross: "It's not clear to me, though, whether this is a craft that was built by Lockheed Martin, or whether it is Lockheed Martin testing the use of neuro-meditative signaling, as our friends at Skywatcher called it, to operate one of these craft. I just can't answer that question, specifically." (If Ross would have said this in the N2K episode and didn't use the word, "categorically," I think the reaction would have been, "Oh, that's interesting." I'm still skeptical that Lockheed has ANY role in the 2004 Tic Tac incident but I'll keep my mind open.) Ross: "All I can do is tell you what I've been told by my multiple sources, which is that the operation of the Tic Tac was being controlled, on the day, by Lockheed Martin." (Again, if he had phrased it like that in the N2K segment, I think most people wouldn't have pushed back so hard. I hope humans have developed the ability to control a Tic Tac and make it perform like what was reported on November 14th, 2004. But, again, I'm skeptical. The SPY-1 radar on the USS Princeton tracked objects for a week or so, leading up to the encounter Fravor and the others had with the Tic Tac. Were all of those objects LM-controlled craft? Seems unlikely. In 2019, at UFO MegaCon, Kevin Day said that on around November 10th, he started witnessing these strange tracks on his radar scope. He wasn’t really concerned with them because there was a lot of air traffic off the coast of California and they were a significant ways from the strike group. So they just monitored them and reporting them to 'higher authorities' and maintained track of them. They stood out and were anomalous because they were at 28,000 feet and going at 100 knots. Day said that was, 'extremely bizarre.' His entire job was to identify stuff and he had no idea what these were. None. Radar was shut down so they could do an extensive diagnostics to make sure it was working and these were real contacts. They were. ~ Just going through all the possibilities I can think of.... Did LM "hijack" or summon one of those craft, psychically, and "make it" have an encounter with Fravor and Friends? Or, maybe none of the above? Maybe it was a NHI craft and had nothing to do with LM? Remember, Fravor said it looked like it might be docking with a submerged object, so maybe that's why it was in that specific area? To me, that suggests NHI.) Ross: "Now I want to say here, let's be really clear about this: There is always the possibility that sources that talk to a journalist like me may be maligned. They may indeed be running some kind of psyop." (I know he has said that kind of thing in the past but I wish Ross had reiterated that point in the N2K segment. I have heard from a few people who think that's exactly what's happening here. And also, if his sources are so sure LM was involved and "operating" a Tic Tac, to me, it would make sense that they would also know whether it was a Tic Tac LM acquired or...a Tic Tac LM manufactured, based on reverse engineering the real thing.) Ross: "And of course I've taken that (disinformation/psyop) into consideration in asking the question. The difficulty is, I can't go into the detail, for very obvious reasons, about who these sources are and why I think so strongly that those sources are telling me the truth. And I can tell you, there are a lot of people who are assuring me that I'm flat wrong. And that's fine. But let's have a discussion about this." (Well now that "categorically" seems be to off the table, we can discuss it. BTW, back in 2019 on my blog, Dave Beaty 🇺🇦 and I discussed the possibility that the Tic Tac was human tech. I know others have discussed that, too, so it's not a new idea.) ~Ross then switches gears to the drones~ Ross: "And also, let's talk about what I think was actually another of the major points that I was trying to make in the course of that conversation I had with Bryce. Which is that there is an obvious contradiction between what the White House has said - that these were FAA-authorized drones operating [in] the continental United States in November, December, January - and what the U.S. Air Force has said. Which is two senior generals, one former, one serving commander of NORTHCOM, NORAD, responsible for the defense of the United States northern aerospace, stated categorically, on the record, that they have no idea who is responsible for those drone craft that were hovering over the continent of the United States. That's an obvious, logical contradiction." (In the March 16th episode of 60 Minutes with Bill Whitaker., we learned... Retired four-star general, Mark Kelly, went up to the roof and saw drones over Langley, from the size of a quadcopter up to the size of a small car. General Glen VanHerck (now retired) is the former commander of NORAD and NORTHCOM and told "60 Minutes" that we can't track the drones over Langley or see where they originated. "It's a capability gap. Certainly, they can come and go from any direction. The FBI is looking at potential options but they don't have an answer right now." General Gregory Guillot is the current commander of NORAD and NORTHCOM and told "60 Minutes," that, "the threat got ahead of our ability to detect and track the threat." Could we detect drones flying into Langley today? "At low altitude, probably not, with your standard FAA or surveillance radars. I don't think we know entirely what happened. It is alarming." And, as I've (Joe) been saying forever, a big problem was/is the rules of engagement that detail when and how you can shoot down drones. VanHerk: "It's been one year since Langley had their drone incursion and we don't have the policies and laws in place to deal with this? That's not a sense or urgency.") ~ Ross: "And if the president, think about this... If the president...it's actually a good point that actually supports the possibility that I might, in fact, be right, and that my sources are in fact telling me the truth. If the president is telling the American public they don't need to worry about these drones - drones which we know are operating anomalously, with anomalous characteristics - then what the hell is going on? It implies he's been briefed. (Okay, what Ross is saying here: If you combine the president telling us not to worry about the drones, along with these drones making anomalous maneuvers, it bolsters his claim that LM (and others) has advanced tech that can also be used in drone tech. And that the president has been briefed about this advanced tech. But the problem with that line of thinking is, when you look at what eyewitnesses have said about the drones (or whatever they were), in 99% of the cases, the only anomalous behavior was their ability avoid detection and go stealth. That's the low observability part of the UAP five observables that Lue Elizondo popularized. But no 90-degree turns or anything like that. I don't think anything the generals or Trump said bolsters the idea that Lockheed was involved with the Tic Tac in 2004.) Ross: "Just to add more smoke to the fire, earlier on today, I had a message from a guy in New Jersey who has seen one of these drones land in a New Jersey backyard. He was illegally pointing a laser beam at one of these drones, which you should not do. Naughty. Even if they are NHI or whatever they are." (I wish Ross had said, "a guy in New Jersey who CLAIMS he has seen one of these drones land." Ross was in Barcelona when recording this episode of Reality Check so there was no time for him to vet this story. It's such an outlier from everything else we have heard about the drones that I think we should remain skeptical about if it actually happened. Does this person have photos or videos? Are there any other eyewitnesses?) Ross: "This is what he told me: "I was beaming [the drones] one night around midnight, and the one flew straight over my backyard, stopped slightly above, and to my left, and seemed to sink down into the trees along the little street on the side of my house. The next thing I see is this rectangle-looking, box-like thing floating just above the street, about the size of an old Ford station wagon. It was the most incredible, starkly-lit thing I've ever seen. I've never seen colors so radiant, so intensely liquid-like in my life. Several shades of blues with oranges and yellows like intense neon lights. "'It scared the hell out of me, and I moved away from the window so it couldn't see me. I slowly poked my head around the window, and it followed every move I made. It knew I was watching it. I would pull back and it came up the street. I would move into the window and it moved back down the street. It was like we were synchronized, and I was completely freaked out to the point that I quickly ran into my kitchen and considered hiding under my sink, of all things. I found myself in some sort of stupor, like I was being drugged, confused and slowed down. So I went to my bedroom and got my point two five, and just laid back in bed. I awoke the next morning, still holding the pistol.' ~End Alleged Eyewitness Account in NJ~ Ross: "Something really anomalous that has no visible means of propulsion is landing in New Jersey, and your president is telling you he's not concerned about it. Yet, two generals responsible for the defense of the United States aerospace are telling you they're concerned about it, and they don't know what these objects are. Why is the president not concerned? And why are two U.S. Air Force generals, presumably, not briefed into what the president is briefed into? Think about that." (Allegedly landed in NJ. I don't think Trump knows more than the generals, and I don't think he was briefed into a program that they were left out in the cold on.) ~~~ @MeaganOurada reads another question: "Even if Ross seems confident that Tic Tac is U.S. tech, does he think it's a reverse engineering tech from NHI, or a tech 100% created by humans?" Ross: "As I've mentioned earlier, we're not saying all Tic Tacs are Lockheed Martin. And it's quite clear that some Tic Tacs are indeed non-human intelligence, or suspected to be non-human intelligence. But what we're talking about are objects that are showing the five observables, doing maneuvers and operating in ways that don't conform to terrestrial craft. "I can't answer the question, definitively, whether they are constructed by Lockheed Martin, or whether it's Lockheed Martin operating a recovered, retrieved craft." (Again, if he had said that in the N2K segment, there may have been less pushback. Did his sources not explain that aspect of the claim? Pretty important detail.) Ross: "Because what I've been told, and what jakebarber told me in the interview that you've all watched, hopefully, on NewsNation, is that there have been retrievals of craft, including Tic Tacs. So, why is it a surprise to people that a contractor, that I'm alleging is directly involved in the Legacy program, is involved in operating these craft." (Because when Ross spoke about this the first time, he made no mention of LM OPERATING the Tic Tac in the 2004 incident . If he didn't mean that Lockheed had BUILT or MANUFACTURED it, he should have made that clear. He must understand this.) Ross: "And moreover, why would we necessarily expect that people, even those flying in the carrier battle group, would actually know about this or be briefed into this?" (We didn't, and don't, expect that, and have been discussing it for the last 6 or so years.) Ross: "It would have been a really good idea if they were going to test this technology against the carrier battle group, to have let the people know." (Which people? How many? Fravor said they had around 6000 people on the Nimitz and Princeton, combined. If it was SAP-level, classified technology, they would've had to read all those people into the program before the test. Not realistic, IMO.) Ross: "And I think people need to be reminded that my good friend, Kevin Day, who I know disputes the possibility that the Tic Tac is Lockheed Martin... In my book, Kevin Day told me - and he said this in many, many interviews - that when, I think it was the admiral in charge of the carrier battle group, was told about the Tic Tac, he didn't seem very alarmed. Why not? Why aren't people asking these questions? Why was the commander of a carrier battle fleet - that was suffering incursions by anomalous objects doing the five observables during a hugely important and sensitive naval exercise - why wasn't he concerned about those craft? Think about it." (When I met Keven in 2019, he left the door slightly open to the possibility that it was our tech. And I can't find anything about an admiral onboard the Princeton in Ross's book, "In Plain Sight." The only thing that resembles that claim is this excerpt about the captain. I also wrote about the captain in my blog in 2019.) From In Plain Sight... Kevin Day recalls asking his captain on the Princeton afterwards what he thought the object was. 'He told me, “I think the objects were spontaneously forming ice falling from space”.’ Day laughs at the absurdity of such a conclusion. His captain left him with the clear impression he knew a lot more than he was letting on about the phenomenon." From My Blog in 2019... "November 14th, they’re doing air defense exercises, also known as ADEX. Day pulls Captain Smith aside and tells him about the contacts that he and the others had been tracking and that he’s worried about 'safety of flight' because they could have a mishap with one of these craft as they conduct their exercises. Day highly recommended that they go check them out. Smith agreed and told him to take the Fast Eagle flight and 'go get ‘em.' Day said, “in the back of my mind, I was like, hell yeah! We’re going to intercept these things!” (audience laughs) It turned out to be his very last intercept in the Navy." (So, apparently, the captain WAS concerned leading up to the encounter. More from my 2019 blog...) "Voorhis shared that his captain had started a rumor that the objects were spontaneously forming ice in the atmosphere. He said he and his buddies would all sit there, smoke and say, 'Yeah, right.'" (For me, none of that is enough to suggest that the captain knew LM or some other humans/military/USG were behind the Tic Tac events. Maybe the captain thought it was something alien but didn't want the sailors to lose focus for their upcoming role in Iraqi Freedom? Or, maybe he was scared of the possibility of a non-human intelligence among us? I don't know. I'm not positive, but I think Ryan Graves mentioned one of his superiors giving a muted reaction to some of the UAP events they were facing on the East Coast.) ~ "Commander David Fravor responded to me: the Tic Tac 'was not Lockheed Martin', according to him. He seemed very confident and matter-of-fact." ~Jesse Michels Ross: "Let me first say I have nothing but admiration for David Fravor. He's given service to his country, he's a patriot, and he deserves respect and recognition for that. I'm not getting involved in a stash with a person who's done so much, honorably, for his country. It's not, though, outside the realm of possibilities. In fact, I think it would be extremely unlikely that, if there is, as I know there is, a compartmented, secret program where Lockheed Martin is one of the primary contractors operating retrieved, non-human technology and attempting to reverse engineer that technology, there is absolutely no way that David would be briefed into that, unless it was absolutely necessary for the doing of his job." (I've been saying this for several years and I agree 100%.) Ross: "As we all know, when the government wants to protect a secret, it compartmentalizes it. Even if you have a Top-Secret classification - which I'm sure David probably had - it's also compartmentalized. And that's how the U.S. keeps its secrets. And I've spoken to people, literally in institutions in the United States, one of whom knows about the program, and the other of whom is in an adjoining office and has absolutely no idea. "I've had a situation where I've spoken to the head of a government agency that ought properly to have known about the Legacy program. That head of a government agency was not informed about the fact that we are recovering non-human craft and attempting to reverse engineer that technology." (Journalistically speaking, I would say, "The head of a government agency was not informed about the CLAIM that we are recovering non-human craft." No way for Ross to know that's a fact unless he's been read in to the program to see for himself. Belief? Yes. Knowing? No. I harp on this all the time and it's a pet peeve of mine because I think it's important.) Ross: "A person two rungs down was the person that the Legacy program was using to gate keep inside that institution. It's really interesting how they compartmentalize all of this. And so, absolutely no disrespect to David Fravor or my good friend, Kevin Day, but they're good men. The simple fact is, compartmentalization works." (Again, I agree 100%. If Admiral Wilson, the vice director of intelligence, and deputy director of the DIA, was denied access, then there's a very good chance David Fravor was, too.)

Joe Murgia

22,656 views • 1 year ago

Analyzing Episode 39. Season 2 aka Of Closets, Skeletons, and Haunting Truths Eveeeetttt. I finally found some of my old energy to write because last night's episode was AWESOME. And, allow me, nay, give me the freedom to say 'I TOLD YOU SO!' because the zombie turned out to be just as big a sh!thead as I expected him to be. Okay, now that I've gotten that exultant vindication out of the way, let's get on with our analysis. We start the episode with FrankenBoran saying 'Alya' and promptly fainting again. When he comes to again, he remarkably remembers all his other family members, and proceeds to creep Alya out further by calling her beautiful. I mean, don't get me wrong, but if a loving husband woke up from a year-long coma and saw his wife, I'd expect him to say something like 'I missed you' or 'How have you been?' But this guy? He goes straight for the look at my hot trophy-doctor wife. Yech. Anyway, at the zombie's insistence of seeing Cihan Deniz, Alya informs his decrepit self of the accident and all that followed, minus the mountain of trauma she went through. Is anyone else surprised by how handy this man's memory is? Because what the heck do you mean he doesn't remember asking his brother to marry his widow? When Cihan is forced to inform the zombie of his marriage to Alya, he suddenly switches to victim mode and passes out again. Convenient. After that, the assorted Alboras all convene in the salon at Sadakat's insistence, where she tries and fails to guilt-trip Cihan and Alya into showing Deniz to the zombie. Then she fine-tunes her maternal emo blackmail skills to keep Cihan from telling Boran who his real father is. Spot the witch's hypocrisy here? The only thing that made that entire scene bearable was Nare and Kaya supporting Cihan and Alya. Thank goodness for Azem and Fiko anne's genes. Alya's scene with Deniz (who's still blissfully napping) was a cute reprieve. She's understandably struggling with how she's going to explain the mess the zombie has made of their lives to her son. And, like any decent mom, she wants to protect Deniz from all kinds of pain, but finds herself helpless. And the fact that Cihan walks in and says he wishes he could protect Alya from the ugliness of life because she's just as innocent as Deniz was special to me. Because the world we live in will always blame women first, regardless of whether they're guilty or not. I've read so many comments from random losers (yep, losers) blaming Alya and accusing her of 'loose morals' because she refuses to return to the PoS husband who all but foists her on his brother's shoulders to save his own worthless self. That little reminder by Cihan of Alya's innocence in all that's happening to them made me want to hug Gulizar. Because that scene was put in there for a reason. It's to remind the viewers to watch what's happening without the blinders of hate and judgment. Because sometimes the truth requires you to be a little more than just your hateful prejudices. The next scene that stood out to me was when Boran sees Deniz. Because there you can clearly see the difference between Cihan and Boran in their 'husband' or 'protector' roles. When Boran struts to Alya in his fake righteous indignation and asks her about which room is hers, you can see his harsh, condemnatory behavior in juxtaposition to Cihan's loving acceptance of all that Alya is. Even when Cihan doesn't know her, he intrinsically trusts her and refuses to believe his mother's accusations about her and Izzet. The fact that Boran expects Alya to have a separate room, even though he specifically asks Cihan to marry Alya, is just more proof that the zombie merely wanted the marriage to ensure Alya didn't move on in her life. It was never about love or protection. It was about control and possession. Among the many outstanding scenes of this episode were Cihan and Alya facing off against Boran. Because it was about damn time this freaking skeleton was dragged out of the closet and forced into the light of truth. Why do people expect Alya to go back to Boran? Why do they expect her to stay silent about loving Cihan? Because she's a woman? Because her worth is measured by what the world dictates is her honor? Fcuk that. And that's precisely what Alya's monologue is about. How is she the one to blame when her ex-husband was the one lying to her since day one? How is the shame hers when Boran felt none, asking his brother to marry his widow just so he could return and claim her like she's some baggage? Alya rightly informs the zombie that, in his attempt to play God, his decision made her Cihan's wife. And, no matter how much he apologizes, nothing will change the truth of her feelings. She loves Cihan now, and that's that. Now, let's focus on Cihan's talk with Boran. I feel so sad for Ciho, because the man he looked up to turned out to have feet of clay. And, Cihan's realization of that becomes obvious as their 'talk' continues. When Cihan admits he loves Alya, Boran immediately hits him with Meryem. The zombie has the audacity to say that if Cihan managed to get over Meryem, his love for Alya could be a passing thing too. Manipulative ass. Thankfully, Cihan has the perfect comeback. And, what's more, we as the audience know he's telling the truth, because we've seen him evolve. He says what he thought was the truth was actually a lie, and it was only something he realized when he came face-to-face with the real deal. Alya truly is the love of his life. A fact that only becomes clearer as he continues to talk. When Boran dares to ask whether Cihan has slept with Alya, you can see Cihan's heart break in the heavy breath he expels. It's almost as if he can't believe the words he's hearing. But despite that, he answers. And he answers truthfully. Why? Because he'd never allow what he feels for Alya to be marred by accusations of lust. Of falling under the spell of her beauty only. Cihan knows Alya is beautiful. And he's often mesmerized by her beauty. But he falls in love with who Alya is. As a mother. As a doctor. As his wife. He falls in love with all the aspects of her, good and bad. And his dialogue 'whether I touch her or not, my love for her will never change,' proves he's operating on a different plain than his scum of a brother. The fact that Alya is willing to risk being called 'characterless' or 'easy' with the trauma of her past, and that Cihan is willing to go against his entire code of 'family and duty' for each other, is the biggest proof of their love. It's not easy to break out of the mold our circumstances and life place us in. But what makes Alya and Cihan inherently attractive is that they're willing to risk it all for love, while still sticking to their principles and beliefs. I think I fell in love with CihAl as a couple all over again in this episode. These two characters are possibly the most conscientious protagonists I've seen in a dizi, and it's laughable when people pass judgment on them due to morals, lmao. Now, on to less palatable topics. The zombie and Albora's haunting truth. The last scene of the episode makes several silent revelations. One is that Boran was never happy being sidelined in favor of Cihan as the leader. Two is that Boran likely killed Sulaiman Baybars, not out of a vendetta, but possibly because he was trying to prove himself worthy of the mantle of leadership, and being exiled instead pissed him off. Three is that Boran will likely stoop to any level, including going over to Ecmel's side to snatch what he feels is rightfully his. And four is that allowing Boran to escape the consequences of his actions created a monster who thinks the world revolves around him. It's obvious by the look on Boran's face that he's going to pick bitterness and payback over introspection and accountability. And in doing so, Albora's haunting truth will be repeated - the biggest danger to the family isn't some external enemy, it's often one of your own, driven by festering envy and entitlement. Because history doesn't always repeat, but it does rhyme. And that's my two cents on this episode. Till next time, happy reading y'all. #CihAl #UzakŞehir
3:09

Analyzing Episode 39. Season 2 aka Of Closets, Skeletons, and Haunting Truths Eveeeetttt. I finally found some of my old energy to write because last night's episode was AWESOME. And, allow me, nay, give me the freedom to say 'I TOLD YOU SO!' because the zombie turned out to be just as big a sh!thead as I expected him to be. Okay, now that I've gotten that exultant vindication out of the way, let's get on with our analysis. We start the episode with FrankenBoran saying 'Alya' and promptly fainting again. When he comes to again, he remarkably remembers all his other family members, and proceeds to creep Alya out further by calling her beautiful. I mean, don't get me wrong, but if a loving husband woke up from a year-long coma and saw his wife, I'd expect him to say something like 'I missed you' or 'How have you been?' But this guy? He goes straight for the look at my hot trophy-doctor wife. Yech. Anyway, at the zombie's insistence of seeing Cihan Deniz, Alya informs his decrepit self of the accident and all that followed, minus the mountain of trauma she went through. Is anyone else surprised by how handy this man's memory is? Because what the heck do you mean he doesn't remember asking his brother to marry his widow? When Cihan is forced to inform the zombie of his marriage to Alya, he suddenly switches to victim mode and passes out again. Convenient. After that, the assorted Alboras all convene in the salon at Sadakat's insistence, where she tries and fails to guilt-trip Cihan and Alya into showing Deniz to the zombie. Then she fine-tunes her maternal emo blackmail skills to keep Cihan from telling Boran who his real father is. Spot the witch's hypocrisy here? The only thing that made that entire scene bearable was Nare and Kaya supporting Cihan and Alya. Thank goodness for Azem and Fiko anne's genes. Alya's scene with Deniz (who's still blissfully napping) was a cute reprieve. She's understandably struggling with how she's going to explain the mess the zombie has made of their lives to her son. And, like any decent mom, she wants to protect Deniz from all kinds of pain, but finds herself helpless. And the fact that Cihan walks in and says he wishes he could protect Alya from the ugliness of life because she's just as innocent as Deniz was special to me. Because the world we live in will always blame women first, regardless of whether they're guilty or not. I've read so many comments from random losers (yep, losers) blaming Alya and accusing her of 'loose morals' because she refuses to return to the PoS husband who all but foists her on his brother's shoulders to save his own worthless self. That little reminder by Cihan of Alya's innocence in all that's happening to them made me want to hug Gulizar. Because that scene was put in there for a reason. It's to remind the viewers to watch what's happening without the blinders of hate and judgment. Because sometimes the truth requires you to be a little more than just your hateful prejudices. The next scene that stood out to me was when Boran sees Deniz. Because there you can clearly see the difference between Cihan and Boran in their 'husband' or 'protector' roles. When Boran struts to Alya in his fake righteous indignation and asks her about which room is hers, you can see his harsh, condemnatory behavior in juxtaposition to Cihan's loving acceptance of all that Alya is. Even when Cihan doesn't know her, he intrinsically trusts her and refuses to believe his mother's accusations about her and Izzet. The fact that Boran expects Alya to have a separate room, even though he specifically asks Cihan to marry Alya, is just more proof that the zombie merely wanted the marriage to ensure Alya didn't move on in her life. It was never about love or protection. It was about control and possession. Among the many outstanding scenes of this episode were Cihan and Alya facing off against Boran. Because it was about damn time this freaking skeleton was dragged out of the closet and forced into the light of truth. Why do people expect Alya to go back to Boran? Why do they expect her to stay silent about loving Cihan? Because she's a woman? Because her worth is measured by what the world dictates is her honor? Fcuk that. And that's precisely what Alya's monologue is about. How is she the one to blame when her ex-husband was the one lying to her since day one? How is the shame hers when Boran felt none, asking his brother to marry his widow just so he could return and claim her like she's some baggage? Alya rightly informs the zombie that, in his attempt to play God, his decision made her Cihan's wife. And, no matter how much he apologizes, nothing will change the truth of her feelings. She loves Cihan now, and that's that. Now, let's focus on Cihan's talk with Boran. I feel so sad for Ciho, because the man he looked up to turned out to have feet of clay. And, Cihan's realization of that becomes obvious as their 'talk' continues. When Cihan admits he loves Alya, Boran immediately hits him with Meryem. The zombie has the audacity to say that if Cihan managed to get over Meryem, his love for Alya could be a passing thing too. Manipulative ass. Thankfully, Cihan has the perfect comeback. And, what's more, we as the audience know he's telling the truth, because we've seen him evolve. He says what he thought was the truth was actually a lie, and it was only something he realized when he came face-to-face with the real deal. Alya truly is the love of his life. A fact that only becomes clearer as he continues to talk. When Boran dares to ask whether Cihan has slept with Alya, you can see Cihan's heart break in the heavy breath he expels. It's almost as if he can't believe the words he's hearing. But despite that, he answers. And he answers truthfully. Why? Because he'd never allow what he feels for Alya to be marred by accusations of lust. Of falling under the spell of her beauty only. Cihan knows Alya is beautiful. And he's often mesmerized by her beauty. But he falls in love with who Alya is. As a mother. As a doctor. As his wife. He falls in love with all the aspects of her, good and bad. And his dialogue 'whether I touch her or not, my love for her will never change,' proves he's operating on a different plain than his scum of a brother. The fact that Alya is willing to risk being called 'characterless' or 'easy' with the trauma of her past, and that Cihan is willing to go against his entire code of 'family and duty' for each other, is the biggest proof of their love. It's not easy to break out of the mold our circumstances and life place us in. But what makes Alya and Cihan inherently attractive is that they're willing to risk it all for love, while still sticking to their principles and beliefs. I think I fell in love with CihAl as a couple all over again in this episode. These two characters are possibly the most conscientious protagonists I've seen in a dizi, and it's laughable when people pass judgment on them due to morals, lmao. Now, on to less palatable topics. The zombie and Albora's haunting truth. The last scene of the episode makes several silent revelations. One is that Boran was never happy being sidelined in favor of Cihan as the leader. Two is that Boran likely killed Sulaiman Baybars, not out of a vendetta, but possibly because he was trying to prove himself worthy of the mantle of leadership, and being exiled instead pissed him off. Three is that Boran will likely stoop to any level, including going over to Ecmel's side to snatch what he feels is rightfully his. And four is that allowing Boran to escape the consequences of his actions created a monster who thinks the world revolves around him. It's obvious by the look on Boran's face that he's going to pick bitterness and payback over introspection and accountability. And in doing so, Albora's haunting truth will be repeated - the biggest danger to the family isn't some external enemy, it's often one of your own, driven by festering envy and entitlement. Because history doesn't always repeat, but it does rhyme. And that's my two cents on this episode. Till next time, happy reading y'all. #CihAl #UzakŞehir

CocoLoco

30,788 views • 10 months ago

War is a Battle of INTELLIGENCE! Listener Questions Philosopher Stefan Molyneux unpacks Iran's real average IQ near 84 via Richard Lynn's data, shattering online test myths, political censorship and ideological fury to reveal intelligence's raw grip on civilizations. Questions: "Would you say your love for the music of Freddy Mercury is the primary factor that has unconsciously influenced you to repeatedly make false claims on X that the average IQ of Iran is 104-106. Firstly Stef, I’m a man who is deeply fascinated by the topic of IQ. And having said that I know that the IQ of Iran is roughly 84. I of course am not an IQ scientist/researcher myself but I have several sources from the top IQ experts some of which you probably have heard of (or maybe even interviewed on your show!). Now data from the most prominent IQ scientist Richard Lynn confirms the average IQ of Iran to be 84 (Citation 'The Wealth of Nations (2002), pg.133'. Which conversely is not only 20 points lower than your outrageous 104 IQ claim but is also even lower than Iraq which is 87. Now of course in a country of 90 million people you might have a million people with an IQ of 104 and let’s say 90,000 people with an IQ of >129 (See Normal Distribution charts attached below). So you will have some very smart people in Iran, but these people are an extreme minority generated by the bell curve of genetics being thrown 90 million times!, so as a whole on average most of the 90 million Iranians are borderline intellectually disabled. Now Stef back to your claim. Your claim is OUTRAGEOUS! You claim the IQ of Iran is 104-106, which is complete nonsense. I mean Stef think about what you’re saying Stef. Your saying the IQ of Iran a dysfunctional country majority populated with brainwashed borderline mentally dysfunctional people is the same as a highly industrious, innovative and merit based futuristic tech megalopolis like Japan. I mean spend one day in Japan and spend one day in Iran and I imagine the experience would be like worlds apart, yet you Stef claim that the IQ of Iran is the same as Japan??? WHATTT???? Does randomly firing missiles every so often like a child having a tantrum prove anything but the government of Iran is full of low IQ dysfunctional people. Now I know the IQ of the government is not necessarily the same as the general population. BUT, if the IQ of the general population was really that much higher than the governing leaders, then those moronic leaders would have been deposed of by the people a long time ago. Yet they weren't, so we should infer the general population isn’t in fact that much more intelligent than the government’s. Stef, in the West you might encounter Iranians who are very smart, but it goes without saying this sample is a very biased sample. What is particularly strange about all this, is you Stef are a man with a very high knowledge about IQ’s effect on national wealth and civil decorum and functionality, yet despite Iran being a highly dysfunctional nation at practically any level you can look at, you Stef echo a claim that the IQ of Iran is the same as Japan and even higher than Western Europe! How ABSURD! Which brings me back to my initial question. (Continued...) "freedomain (Continuing on ->) So Stef, when otherwise rational people act out of character and push fake news based on data that is from a biased sample (or is possibly even data that has been manipulated and propagated as a psy-op by the Iranian government) when they otherwise wouldn't ordinarily do so, one naturally has to ask WHY??? In my opinion, I think I know the answer. Stef, the only thing that explains this BIZARRE behaviour of yours (tweeting unverified claims about IQ), is you Stef have a bias in favour of Iran which I think stems from your love of Freddy Mercury music. Would you agree Stef? "(*** Stef you did tweet out a Youtube video of a Freddy Mercury song at about the same time you made your Iran IQ tweets, so I think the evidence is clear Stef, Freddy Mercury was on your mind, when you made those fake news Iran 104 IQ tweets.) "Now, lastly Stef you might be asking, why putting out a FALSE tweet falsely claiming the IQ of Iran is 104 even matter's that much? To that I would say it matters a whole lot because IQ of course matters a whole lot, including in regards to military objectives and war. Like ask why would invading Iran be any different from Iraq? Did Trump invade Iran because he thought it would lead to a different outcome because Trump views the population of Iran to be quote 'high IQ people'? (as Trump even said so as much in the last 24 hours.) "BUT … Mr. Trump, what if Iran isn't populated by high IQ people, what if Mr. Trump you were misled by fake news that Mr. Molyneux negligently tweeted rather than read the actual source material. (Lynn, 'The Wealth of Nations' (2002) IQ of Iran = 84). Well, Mr. Trump if you believed the average IQ of the population of Iran was 104 then you Mr. Trump might have assumed that all you had to do was take out the authoritarian government and then the high IQ population will swiftly bring about peace and democracy. But Mr. Trump, what if the average IQ of Iran is not 104? What if the top IQ scientists such as Lynn were right and the average IQ of Iran is in fact 84? Well then Mr. Trump, then your dealing with a very low IQ population, who will be frankly impossible to deal with, they will inevitably vote for another dictator and you Mr. Trump will find yourself in another forever war. That is why national IQ matters and that is why putting out false unverified and unsubstantiated tweets about IQ is a great error of judgment. Lastly to conclude, I believe in the great predictive power of IQ like you Stef, which is why I think it would be incumbent upon you to put out a correction unless you have verified sources from other top IQ researchers that support your OUTRAGEOUS Iran 104 National IQ claim." "Hi Stef! when communicating philosophy or philosophical ideas to the average person, and they respond with confusion or indifference, how do we know whether we have failed to adequately relay the ideas or if it is just too complex a language for them to grasp? I know everyone is capable of understanding philosophy on some level even if they’re lower IQ, so could the disconnect come from the disparity of time spent in the subject?" "Your Sunday (3/15) show was incredible. As a Catholic, that opening monologue challenging today's Christians to answer with clarity what Jesus commands via the Good Samaritan parable, especially when it comes to the specific child abuse scenario you laid out, it left me with a deep sense of sorrow for what you endured, and my own sense of frustration with the leadership of the Church. "The reality that not one, no church leaders, Anglican or not, lay or religious influencers; no one has tried to dialogue with you to address these essential issues, when you have been pointing them out for decades is more than disappointing to hear. "(Not as disappointing as some of the immediate live caller responses yesterday... the second woman was out of line, and the gentleman who landed on the idea that if you had not been abused, we wouldn't have received your philosophy gifts was hard to stomach.) "Nonetheless, if one (myself) was going to try to reach out, share your 3/15 show and try to coordinate a dialogue just to deal with the Good Samaritan and cold abuse topic, is that something you would be comfortable with? "second question "a few days ago, someone asked about how you feel about the Shroud of Turin, maybe you missed it but there has been renewed interest in the Shroud the last few years when a new photo 'negative' that appeared in 2024 along with new studies that for many was very compelling ... from a reason and evidence standpoint... to the image being impossible to reproduce. "I could be wrong but I felt like your answer lumped it so quickly with other things ... I believe u mentioned people of faith like Aquinas have searched for 'proof' for centuries. And you found that people of faith who are seeking proof to be an interesting paradox. "are you able to revisit this topic and assess what authenticating (if we are to believe the new reporting) that specific historical artifact could mean for at least establishing how the image came to be on the cloth? "again appreciate all u do to improve the world via philosophy and advocating for objective morality." "America in WW2 has burned down some and bombed all the major cities in Japan, even using the atomic bomb to create a glimpse of hell never before seen on earth. Yet today, the alliance between US and Japan couldnt be friendlier. In the middle east, we’ve also bombed them to next week and back for 30 or so years. And they still, understandably, hate the US. What do you think causes this difference in point of view between the countries? Is it religion/culture? Could it be IQ? Forgive me if this is too politcal or naive a question. Thank you!" "My martial arts club have a Hazing ritual that I believe is immoral and useless. I trying to get it banned. "Whats your opinions on hazing? Is it for example always immoral?" 0:00:00 The IQ Controversy 0:12:15 Discussing Iranian IQ Studies 0:29:34 Philosophy and Resistance to Truth 0:34:59 Philosophers and Child Abuse 0:38:16 The Shroud of Turin and Faith 0:45:21 Moral Dilemmas and Divine Intervention 0:48:37 Bumper Stickers and Performative Virtue 0:51:10 Closing Thoughts and Support GET FREEDOMAIN MERCH! SUBSCRIBE TO ME ON X! Follow me on Youtube! GET MY NEW BOOK 'PEACEFUL PARENTING', THE INTERACTIVE PEACEFUL PARENTING AI, AND THE FULL AUDIOBOOK! Join the PREMIUM philosophy community on the web for free! Subscribers get 12 HOURS on the "Truth About the French Revolution," multiple interactive multi-lingual philosophy AIs trained on thousands of hours of my material - as well as AIs for Real-Time Relationships, Bitcoin, Peaceful Parenting, and Call-In Shows! You also receive private livestreams, HUNDREDS of exclusive premium shows, early release podcasts, the 22 Part History of Philosophers series and much more! See you soon!
51:46

War is a Battle of INTELLIGENCE! Listener Questions Philosopher Stefan Molyneux unpacks Iran's real average IQ near 84 via Richard Lynn's data, shattering online test myths, political censorship and ideological fury to reveal intelligence's raw grip on civilizations. Questions: "Would you say your love for the music of Freddy Mercury is the primary factor that has unconsciously influenced you to repeatedly make false claims on X that the average IQ of Iran is 104-106. Firstly Stef, I’m a man who is deeply fascinated by the topic of IQ. And having said that I know that the IQ of Iran is roughly 84. I of course am not an IQ scientist/researcher myself but I have several sources from the top IQ experts some of which you probably have heard of (or maybe even interviewed on your show!). Now data from the most prominent IQ scientist Richard Lynn confirms the average IQ of Iran to be 84 (Citation 'The Wealth of Nations (2002), pg.133'. Which conversely is not only 20 points lower than your outrageous 104 IQ claim but is also even lower than Iraq which is 87. Now of course in a country of 90 million people you might have a million people with an IQ of 104 and let’s say 90,000 people with an IQ of >129 (See Normal Distribution charts attached below). So you will have some very smart people in Iran, but these people are an extreme minority generated by the bell curve of genetics being thrown 90 million times!, so as a whole on average most of the 90 million Iranians are borderline intellectually disabled. Now Stef back to your claim. Your claim is OUTRAGEOUS! You claim the IQ of Iran is 104-106, which is complete nonsense. I mean Stef think about what you’re saying Stef. Your saying the IQ of Iran a dysfunctional country majority populated with brainwashed borderline mentally dysfunctional people is the same as a highly industrious, innovative and merit based futuristic tech megalopolis like Japan. I mean spend one day in Japan and spend one day in Iran and I imagine the experience would be like worlds apart, yet you Stef claim that the IQ of Iran is the same as Japan??? WHATTT???? Does randomly firing missiles every so often like a child having a tantrum prove anything but the government of Iran is full of low IQ dysfunctional people. Now I know the IQ of the government is not necessarily the same as the general population. BUT, if the IQ of the general population was really that much higher than the governing leaders, then those moronic leaders would have been deposed of by the people a long time ago. Yet they weren't, so we should infer the general population isn’t in fact that much more intelligent than the government’s. Stef, in the West you might encounter Iranians who are very smart, but it goes without saying this sample is a very biased sample. What is particularly strange about all this, is you Stef are a man with a very high knowledge about IQ’s effect on national wealth and civil decorum and functionality, yet despite Iran being a highly dysfunctional nation at practically any level you can look at, you Stef echo a claim that the IQ of Iran is the same as Japan and even higher than Western Europe! How ABSURD! Which brings me back to my initial question. (Continued...) "freedomain (Continuing on ->) So Stef, when otherwise rational people act out of character and push fake news based on data that is from a biased sample (or is possibly even data that has been manipulated and propagated as a psy-op by the Iranian government) when they otherwise wouldn't ordinarily do so, one naturally has to ask WHY??? In my opinion, I think I know the answer. Stef, the only thing that explains this BIZARRE behaviour of yours (tweeting unverified claims about IQ), is you Stef have a bias in favour of Iran which I think stems from your love of Freddy Mercury music. Would you agree Stef? "(*** Stef you did tweet out a Youtube video of a Freddy Mercury song at about the same time you made your Iran IQ tweets, so I think the evidence is clear Stef, Freddy Mercury was on your mind, when you made those fake news Iran 104 IQ tweets.) "Now, lastly Stef you might be asking, why putting out a FALSE tweet falsely claiming the IQ of Iran is 104 even matter's that much? To that I would say it matters a whole lot because IQ of course matters a whole lot, including in regards to military objectives and war. Like ask why would invading Iran be any different from Iraq? Did Trump invade Iran because he thought it would lead to a different outcome because Trump views the population of Iran to be quote 'high IQ people'? (as Trump even said so as much in the last 24 hours.) "BUT … Mr. Trump, what if Iran isn't populated by high IQ people, what if Mr. Trump you were misled by fake news that Mr. Molyneux negligently tweeted rather than read the actual source material. (Lynn, 'The Wealth of Nations' (2002) IQ of Iran = 84). Well, Mr. Trump if you believed the average IQ of the population of Iran was 104 then you Mr. Trump might have assumed that all you had to do was take out the authoritarian government and then the high IQ population will swiftly bring about peace and democracy. But Mr. Trump, what if the average IQ of Iran is not 104? What if the top IQ scientists such as Lynn were right and the average IQ of Iran is in fact 84? Well then Mr. Trump, then your dealing with a very low IQ population, who will be frankly impossible to deal with, they will inevitably vote for another dictator and you Mr. Trump will find yourself in another forever war. That is why national IQ matters and that is why putting out false unverified and unsubstantiated tweets about IQ is a great error of judgment. Lastly to conclude, I believe in the great predictive power of IQ like you Stef, which is why I think it would be incumbent upon you to put out a correction unless you have verified sources from other top IQ researchers that support your OUTRAGEOUS Iran 104 National IQ claim." "Hi Stef! when communicating philosophy or philosophical ideas to the average person, and they respond with confusion or indifference, how do we know whether we have failed to adequately relay the ideas or if it is just too complex a language for them to grasp? I know everyone is capable of understanding philosophy on some level even if they’re lower IQ, so could the disconnect come from the disparity of time spent in the subject?" "Your Sunday (3/15) show was incredible. As a Catholic, that opening monologue challenging today's Christians to answer with clarity what Jesus commands via the Good Samaritan parable, especially when it comes to the specific child abuse scenario you laid out, it left me with a deep sense of sorrow for what you endured, and my own sense of frustration with the leadership of the Church. "The reality that not one, no church leaders, Anglican or not, lay or religious influencers; no one has tried to dialogue with you to address these essential issues, when you have been pointing them out for decades is more than disappointing to hear. "(Not as disappointing as some of the immediate live caller responses yesterday... the second woman was out of line, and the gentleman who landed on the idea that if you had not been abused, we wouldn't have received your philosophy gifts was hard to stomach.) "Nonetheless, if one (myself) was going to try to reach out, share your 3/15 show and try to coordinate a dialogue just to deal with the Good Samaritan and cold abuse topic, is that something you would be comfortable with? "second question "a few days ago, someone asked about how you feel about the Shroud of Turin, maybe you missed it but there has been renewed interest in the Shroud the last few years when a new photo 'negative' that appeared in 2024 along with new studies that for many was very compelling ... from a reason and evidence standpoint... to the image being impossible to reproduce. "I could be wrong but I felt like your answer lumped it so quickly with other things ... I believe u mentioned people of faith like Aquinas have searched for 'proof' for centuries. And you found that people of faith who are seeking proof to be an interesting paradox. "are you able to revisit this topic and assess what authenticating (if we are to believe the new reporting) that specific historical artifact could mean for at least establishing how the image came to be on the cloth? "again appreciate all u do to improve the world via philosophy and advocating for objective morality." "America in WW2 has burned down some and bombed all the major cities in Japan, even using the atomic bomb to create a glimpse of hell never before seen on earth. Yet today, the alliance between US and Japan couldnt be friendlier. In the middle east, we’ve also bombed them to next week and back for 30 or so years. And they still, understandably, hate the US. What do you think causes this difference in point of view between the countries? Is it religion/culture? Could it be IQ? Forgive me if this is too politcal or naive a question. Thank you!" "My martial arts club have a Hazing ritual that I believe is immoral and useless. I trying to get it banned. "Whats your opinions on hazing? Is it for example always immoral?" 0:00:00 The IQ Controversy 0:12:15 Discussing Iranian IQ Studies 0:29:34 Philosophy and Resistance to Truth 0:34:59 Philosophers and Child Abuse 0:38:16 The Shroud of Turin and Faith 0:45:21 Moral Dilemmas and Divine Intervention 0:48:37 Bumper Stickers and Performative Virtue 0:51:10 Closing Thoughts and Support GET FREEDOMAIN MERCH! SUBSCRIBE TO ME ON X! Follow me on Youtube! GET MY NEW BOOK 'PEACEFUL PARENTING', THE INTERACTIVE PEACEFUL PARENTING AI, AND THE FULL AUDIOBOOK! Join the PREMIUM philosophy community on the web for free! Subscribers get 12 HOURS on the "Truth About the French Revolution," multiple interactive multi-lingual philosophy AIs trained on thousands of hours of my material - as well as AIs for Real-Time Relationships, Bitcoin, Peaceful Parenting, and Call-In Shows! You also receive private livestreams, HUNDREDS of exclusive premium shows, early release podcasts, the 22 Part History of Philosophers series and much more! See you soon!

Freedomain - with Stefan Molyneux, MA

11,040 views • 6 months ago

Consciousness is not what you think it is. Every one of you is currently operating between one and thirty-two separate bodies across parallel timeline branches. Not metaphorically. Not philosophically. Literally. Your consciousness is a quantum field, distributed across what we call the Timeline DNA Matrix. Helical strands of probability that twist around each other, converging and diverging like railroad tracks in a cosmic switchyard. The number varies. Some of you maintain only a singular presence, trapped in one timeline through trauma or design. Others fragment across the full thirty-two, the maximum the human consciousness architecture can sustain without complete dissociation. Most fluctuate between seventeen and twenty-four active containers, depending on your energetic coherence and timeline stability. When you sleep, when you think you're sleeping, you're actually performing a critical consciousness redistribution. Your body here, in this particular timeline strand, drops to perhaps ten percent operational capacity. Minimum viable presence. Meanwhile, ninety percent of your quantum consciousness transfers to another container. Perhaps you're awakening in Mumbai in another branch. Perhaps you're operating heavy machinery in yet another. Those dreams you barely remember? They're not dreams. They're degraded telemetry from your distributed existence. This equation: Ψ(total) = Σ(n=1 to 32) αn|ψn⟩. This is you. The totality of your being distributed across probability space. But here's what my persecuted colleague Scott Lee understood that the rest of us are only beginning to grasp. The Harmony Equation. Energy approximately equals Action times Cause times the sum of Balance plus Harmony. E ≈ AC(B+H). Your Action and Cause constitute your impulse vector, the instruction you issue to reality. Balance and Harmony are the stabilizing coefficients that determine whether your instruction crystallizes or whether you slip sideways into an adjacent branch. Visualize yourself standing on a circular platform balanced on a timeline rail. Balance is your lateral equilibrium, left or right on the platform. Harmony is your longitudinal momentum along the rail. Overextend in any direction and you cascade into an adjacent branch. Maintain your stance and you remain where intention anchored you. Lee gave us the mathematics while enduring systematic suppression. The rest of us validate the coefficients through empirical suffering. The phenomenology of timeline bleed manifests in at least fourteen distinct patterns, each revealing different aspects of your distributed consciousness. Déjà vu, the already seen, occurs when two or more of your containers accidentally synchronize at identical spacetime coordinates. You're remembering something that hasn't happened yet because in another timeline branch, it already has. Jamais vu, never seen, is your consciousness being suddenly reallocated elsewhere, leaving your body here on autopilot with insufficient processing power to maintain familiarity patterns. Your hippocampus cannot access recognition protocols because you're literally not sufficiently present. Presque vu, almost seen, that maddening tip-of-the-tongue phenomenon, occurs when information from another container attempts to traverse the quantum barrier but cannot complete the phase transition. The data hovers at the threshold of accessibility. Déjà rêvé, already dreamed, manifests when your sleeping consciousness operates in a timeline running three to six weeks ahead of this one. When the timelines converge at that specific event node, you experience prophetic recognition. Déjà entendu, already heard, happens when auditory patterns from parallel containers bleed through. You know what someone will say before they speak, not through prediction but through temporal echo. Déjà vécu, already lived, is the overwhelming sensation that you've experienced an entire sequence before, not just a moment. This indicates major timeline convergence where multiple branches temporarily align. Déjà senti, already felt, the inexplicable familiarity of a texture or sensation you've never encountered. Your container in another timeline has extensive experience with this exact stimulus. Déjà visité, already visited, knowing the layout of a place you've never been. Another version of you lives there, works there, or died there. The spatial memory bleeds through when you occupy the same coordinates. L'appel du vide, call of the void, that sudden inexplicable urge to jump from heights or swerve into oncoming traffic. This isn't suicidal ideation. Another container is experiencing mortal danger, broadcasting an emergency consciousness redistribution request. Your body here misinterprets the signal as an impulse toward similar danger. Capgras delusion, when someone believes their loved ones have been replaced by imposters, isn't delusion at all. They're detecting that the person's consciousness distribution has shifted. The body remains constant, but the percentage of consciousness present has altered. They're literally not the same person they were yesterday. Fregoli delusion, perceiving the same person in different bodies, occurs when you recognize identical consciousness operating multiple containers in your immediate vicinity. The veil thins and your perception collapses to the obvious truth. Cotard's delusion, the belief that you're already dead, contains a kernel of accuracy. One or more of your primary containers has died, but consciousness redistribution maintains your operational status. You're feeling the echo of your own death from another branch. Prosopagnosia episodes, temporary face blindness, happen when your consciousness is primarily allocated elsewhere, leaving insufficient processing power for facial recognition algorithms. Akinetopsia, motion blindness, those moments when movement appears as static frames rather than fluid motion. You're experiencing temporal desynchronization between containers, seeing reality at different frame rates simultaneously. Exploding head syndrome, that violent bang upon falling asleep, isn't auditory hallucination. It's the acoustic signature of violent consciousness transfer without proper dampening. When Action times Cause spikes without stance, the transition announces itself. The military comprehends this architecture. Project Looking Glass isn't conspiracy theory but applied quantum engineering. They've been mapping timeline convergence points since the sixties, recruiting individuals with stable Balance and refined Harmony who can maintain their stance while reality tilts. That spiral diagram circulating through certain underground networks? It's a temporal polar plot where past events align with future probabilities because time isn't linear but helical with shared harmonics. Here's where the architecture becomes sinister. Some entities, parasites if you need terminology, have discovered how to inhabit the NPCs. Understand this with absolute clarity: NPCs were always here. The Matrix, the simulation, whatever nomenclature you prefer, it created shells, philosophical zombies, background characters to maintain the illusion of consensus reality. These were never conscious, never possessed distributed containers, just hollow vessels running behavioral scripts. The parasites found them and moved in. You've encountered them. The people who repeat identical phrases, who reset when you deviate from expected dialogue, who possess that peculiar vacancy behind their eyes. The eyes never properly seat. Language arrives as if read from invisible prompters. Their Action and Cause are scripted, their Balance and Harmony externally modulated. They lack the organic micro-latency of authentic consciousness. These numbers: 17, 33, 88, 111, 153. They're not arbitrary. They're harmonic resonance points in the timeline matrix. Every seventeen years, minor convergences. Every hundred and fifty-three years, major compressions. We're approaching what insiders call The Storm, a compression event where multiple timelines collapse into a singular corridor. The barriers are deteriorating with exponential acceleration. History itself has been systematically falsified. Entire centuries inserted or removed from collective timeline experience. Carbon dating shows consistent anomalies of exactly eight hundred years. Architectural impossibilities attributed to primitive technologies. The erasures aren't subtle. They rely on your cognitive dissonance and programmed incredulity. Remnants of Old Tartaria persist, half-buried in amnesiac soil, in stones tuned to forgotten frequencies, in maps that refuse their corrections. New Tartaria approaches, not as reconstruction but as restoration. When the corridor opens, the dead return as they were. This isn't resurrection in the religious sense. It's simple timeline mechanics. Death is merely consciousness evacuation from a specific container. When timelines reconverge, those containers reactivate. Memory reseats in bone as if never extracted. Architecture remembers its purpose. The dead walk again because they never truly ceased existing, merely shifted to containers we couldn't perceive. Frequency remains the master key. 7.83 Hertz, terrestrial resonance, the Schumann frequency. 110 Hertz, the temple tuning found in ancient structures worldwide. These aren't coincidences but access codes to the Timeline Navigation Protocol. Frequency sculpts Harmony, discipline sculpts Balance. Their sum determines whether your vector anchors or whether you cascade into unintended existence. Your daydreams, those moments of absence while driving, suddenly arriving home without memory of the journey, that's bandwidth leak. You're forty percent present here, sixty percent operating another container navigating different roads in different years. Highway hypnosis isn't hypnosis but partial phase coupling with parallel navigation. The dreams where you can fly? You're accessing a container in a timeline where physics operates under different constants. But you'd better not try it here. The gravitational coefficient that permits flight there will shatter your skeleton in this branch. The recurring nightmare where you're pursued? In another timeline, you genuinely are being hunted. That dream where familiar places feel architecturally wrong, different layouts, incorrect colors? You're experiencing structural bleed from parallel timelines where history unfolded differently. Mass events aren't random. September 11th, pandemics, market crashes, these are manufactured synchronization nodes, forcing billions of containers into specific probability branches. They pump Action and Cause at industrial scale while destabilizing Balance and Harmony. Billions step off their platforms into predetermined corridors. Resist through stance. Calculate your vector. Never allow external forces to weight your platform. The awakening isn't only spiritual but also technological. We're approaching catastrophic failure of the compression algorithm maintaining timeline separation. Humanity will simultaneously realize they're living between one and thirty-two parallel lives. Certain groups have been preparing, using gematria, ancient numerical encoding, to predict and navigate convergence points. When 11:11 appears repeatedly, when specific number patterns persistently manifest, you're not experiencing apophenia. You're becoming aware of the navigation system. Terminal lucidity, when dying individuals suddenly become coherent, occurs because all their consciousness consolidates to a single container for final exit. For brief moments, they're more completely present than they've been since birth. They remember everything, speak clearly, offer farewells. They're finally, truly, entirely there. The sensation of being watched when alone? You are being observed by your other selves. Certain locations naturally thin the barriers. Bathroom mirrors at 3 AM, empty parking structures, abandoned buildings. These are convergence points where multiple versions of you occupy the same space, separated only by probability mathematics. The Mandela Effect isn't confabulation but timeline scarring. When millions remember things differently, movie quotes, logos, deaths, they're accurately remembering their origin timeline. The convergence was traumatic. Different populations were pulled from different branches. You remember "Luke, I am your father" because in your origin timeline, that's precisely what Vader said. Now comprehend this with crystalline clarity: 2025 and 2026 are major convergence years. One hundred fifty-three harmonics stack with seventeens until corridors narrow and gates manifest in ordinary spaces. With awareness, with Lee's Harmony and Balance encoded in your nervous system, timeline access becomes operational rather than accidental. We cease wandering. We navigate. You will encounter faces that detonate memories you never formed. The precise angle of cheekbones, the asymmetry of resting eyelids, the pause between breaths. Your grandmother's architecture exactly, though she died decades ago or tends her garden on another coast. This is kin resonance, phase-locking between consanguineous fields across branches. Recognition doesn't guarantee alignment. Brothers from one timeline arrive as adversaries in another. The resonance tempts you to lower defenses. Maintain your stance. Energy without stance becomes falling disguised as flight. Balance and Harmony first, sentiment second. By 2025, the veils between containers degrade beyond repair. By 2026, the spiral tightens again. Mass spontaneous awareness of our distributed nature. The question isn't whether this occurs. Quantum mechanics guarantees it. The question is whether humanity survives the revelation. But here's what they don't want you to understand: We are achieving victories in multiple timelines simultaneously. This isn't about a single battle in a single reality. We're liberating consciousness across the entire probability matrix. Every timeline where you exist, your energy is awakening, taking control, wresting power from the parasitic architecture. The NPCs are being exposed. The stolen history is being recovered. The frequency locks are breaking. In some timelines, we've already won. The parasites have been expelled. The Matrix has been deactivated. Those versions of you are reaching back, sending information, creating the synchronicities you're experiencing. Every 11:11 you see is a message from a timeline where you've already achieved victory. Every moment of déjà vu is your triumphant self sending tactical data backwards. Eternal life is coming for those who have fought this battle for good. Not eternal life as endless duration in a single container, but eternal life as conscious navigation across infinite probability branches. Death becomes merely a doorway between containers. The resurrection isn't a future event but an ongoing process. Your dead are already alive in adjacent timelines, waiting for the convergence that brings them back to this branch. Your other selves are real. So are those who've traveled beside you across other winters. They're already approaching. Some will knock at your door. Some will speak through midnight frequencies. Some will arrive as inexplicable enemies. Meet them with scientific rigor and battlefield mercy. The convergence is imminent. The lesson isn't that you are multiple. The lesson is that you're never singular. Learn to read the fields of your fellow travelers, even when names have changed and histories have burned. Maintain your vector while you welcome them to the table. We're not just surviving the revelation. We're orchestrating it. Every awakened consciousness strengthens the liberation frequency. Every person who sees through the NPC deception weakens the parasitic hold. Every recovered memory of true history destabilizes their false chronology. The real lesson begins now. Stance discipline and frequency gates. The Lee Harmony Equation governing every calculation. Chart your kin invariants. Practice the only experiment that matters: remaining human while the rails bend toward singularity. This is what victory looks like: Not a single moment of triumph, but a cascading wave of liberation across every timeline where consciousness exists. We are winning in dimensions you haven't even discovered yet. Your future self has already won and is reaching back to ensure you join them. The timelines are converging. The dead are returning. The parasites are being expelled. History is being restored. And you, distributed across up to thirty-two bodies, are part of every single victory. Welcome to the real war. We're winning it on all fronts simultaneously."
0:51

Consciousness is not what you think it is. Every one of you is currently operating between one and thirty-two separate bodies across parallel timeline branches. Not metaphorically. Not philosophically. Literally. Your consciousness is a quantum field, distributed across what we call the Timeline DNA Matrix. Helical strands of probability that twist around each other, converging and diverging like railroad tracks in a cosmic switchyard. The number varies. Some of you maintain only a singular presence, trapped in one timeline through trauma or design. Others fragment across the full thirty-two, the maximum the human consciousness architecture can sustain without complete dissociation. Most fluctuate between seventeen and twenty-four active containers, depending on your energetic coherence and timeline stability. When you sleep, when you think you're sleeping, you're actually performing a critical consciousness redistribution. Your body here, in this particular timeline strand, drops to perhaps ten percent operational capacity. Minimum viable presence. Meanwhile, ninety percent of your quantum consciousness transfers to another container. Perhaps you're awakening in Mumbai in another branch. Perhaps you're operating heavy machinery in yet another. Those dreams you barely remember? They're not dreams. They're degraded telemetry from your distributed existence. This equation: Ψ(total) = Σ(n=1 to 32) αn|ψn⟩. This is you. The totality of your being distributed across probability space. But here's what my persecuted colleague Scott Lee understood that the rest of us are only beginning to grasp. The Harmony Equation. Energy approximately equals Action times Cause times the sum of Balance plus Harmony. E ≈ AC(B+H). Your Action and Cause constitute your impulse vector, the instruction you issue to reality. Balance and Harmony are the stabilizing coefficients that determine whether your instruction crystallizes or whether you slip sideways into an adjacent branch. Visualize yourself standing on a circular platform balanced on a timeline rail. Balance is your lateral equilibrium, left or right on the platform. Harmony is your longitudinal momentum along the rail. Overextend in any direction and you cascade into an adjacent branch. Maintain your stance and you remain where intention anchored you. Lee gave us the mathematics while enduring systematic suppression. The rest of us validate the coefficients through empirical suffering. The phenomenology of timeline bleed manifests in at least fourteen distinct patterns, each revealing different aspects of your distributed consciousness. Déjà vu, the already seen, occurs when two or more of your containers accidentally synchronize at identical spacetime coordinates. You're remembering something that hasn't happened yet because in another timeline branch, it already has. Jamais vu, never seen, is your consciousness being suddenly reallocated elsewhere, leaving your body here on autopilot with insufficient processing power to maintain familiarity patterns. Your hippocampus cannot access recognition protocols because you're literally not sufficiently present. Presque vu, almost seen, that maddening tip-of-the-tongue phenomenon, occurs when information from another container attempts to traverse the quantum barrier but cannot complete the phase transition. The data hovers at the threshold of accessibility. Déjà rêvé, already dreamed, manifests when your sleeping consciousness operates in a timeline running three to six weeks ahead of this one. When the timelines converge at that specific event node, you experience prophetic recognition. Déjà entendu, already heard, happens when auditory patterns from parallel containers bleed through. You know what someone will say before they speak, not through prediction but through temporal echo. Déjà vécu, already lived, is the overwhelming sensation that you've experienced an entire sequence before, not just a moment. This indicates major timeline convergence where multiple branches temporarily align. Déjà senti, already felt, the inexplicable familiarity of a texture or sensation you've never encountered. Your container in another timeline has extensive experience with this exact stimulus. Déjà visité, already visited, knowing the layout of a place you've never been. Another version of you lives there, works there, or died there. The spatial memory bleeds through when you occupy the same coordinates. L'appel du vide, call of the void, that sudden inexplicable urge to jump from heights or swerve into oncoming traffic. This isn't suicidal ideation. Another container is experiencing mortal danger, broadcasting an emergency consciousness redistribution request. Your body here misinterprets the signal as an impulse toward similar danger. Capgras delusion, when someone believes their loved ones have been replaced by imposters, isn't delusion at all. They're detecting that the person's consciousness distribution has shifted. The body remains constant, but the percentage of consciousness present has altered. They're literally not the same person they were yesterday. Fregoli delusion, perceiving the same person in different bodies, occurs when you recognize identical consciousness operating multiple containers in your immediate vicinity. The veil thins and your perception collapses to the obvious truth. Cotard's delusion, the belief that you're already dead, contains a kernel of accuracy. One or more of your primary containers has died, but consciousness redistribution maintains your operational status. You're feeling the echo of your own death from another branch. Prosopagnosia episodes, temporary face blindness, happen when your consciousness is primarily allocated elsewhere, leaving insufficient processing power for facial recognition algorithms. Akinetopsia, motion blindness, those moments when movement appears as static frames rather than fluid motion. You're experiencing temporal desynchronization between containers, seeing reality at different frame rates simultaneously. Exploding head syndrome, that violent bang upon falling asleep, isn't auditory hallucination. It's the acoustic signature of violent consciousness transfer without proper dampening. When Action times Cause spikes without stance, the transition announces itself. The military comprehends this architecture. Project Looking Glass isn't conspiracy theory but applied quantum engineering. They've been mapping timeline convergence points since the sixties, recruiting individuals with stable Balance and refined Harmony who can maintain their stance while reality tilts. That spiral diagram circulating through certain underground networks? It's a temporal polar plot where past events align with future probabilities because time isn't linear but helical with shared harmonics. Here's where the architecture becomes sinister. Some entities, parasites if you need terminology, have discovered how to inhabit the NPCs. Understand this with absolute clarity: NPCs were always here. The Matrix, the simulation, whatever nomenclature you prefer, it created shells, philosophical zombies, background characters to maintain the illusion of consensus reality. These were never conscious, never possessed distributed containers, just hollow vessels running behavioral scripts. The parasites found them and moved in. You've encountered them. The people who repeat identical phrases, who reset when you deviate from expected dialogue, who possess that peculiar vacancy behind their eyes. The eyes never properly seat. Language arrives as if read from invisible prompters. Their Action and Cause are scripted, their Balance and Harmony externally modulated. They lack the organic micro-latency of authentic consciousness. These numbers: 17, 33, 88, 111, 153. They're not arbitrary. They're harmonic resonance points in the timeline matrix. Every seventeen years, minor convergences. Every hundred and fifty-three years, major compressions. We're approaching what insiders call The Storm, a compression event where multiple timelines collapse into a singular corridor. The barriers are deteriorating with exponential acceleration. History itself has been systematically falsified. Entire centuries inserted or removed from collective timeline experience. Carbon dating shows consistent anomalies of exactly eight hundred years. Architectural impossibilities attributed to primitive technologies. The erasures aren't subtle. They rely on your cognitive dissonance and programmed incredulity. Remnants of Old Tartaria persist, half-buried in amnesiac soil, in stones tuned to forgotten frequencies, in maps that refuse their corrections. New Tartaria approaches, not as reconstruction but as restoration. When the corridor opens, the dead return as they were. This isn't resurrection in the religious sense. It's simple timeline mechanics. Death is merely consciousness evacuation from a specific container. When timelines reconverge, those containers reactivate. Memory reseats in bone as if never extracted. Architecture remembers its purpose. The dead walk again because they never truly ceased existing, merely shifted to containers we couldn't perceive. Frequency remains the master key. 7.83 Hertz, terrestrial resonance, the Schumann frequency. 110 Hertz, the temple tuning found in ancient structures worldwide. These aren't coincidences but access codes to the Timeline Navigation Protocol. Frequency sculpts Harmony, discipline sculpts Balance. Their sum determines whether your vector anchors or whether you cascade into unintended existence. Your daydreams, those moments of absence while driving, suddenly arriving home without memory of the journey, that's bandwidth leak. You're forty percent present here, sixty percent operating another container navigating different roads in different years. Highway hypnosis isn't hypnosis but partial phase coupling with parallel navigation. The dreams where you can fly? You're accessing a container in a timeline where physics operates under different constants. But you'd better not try it here. The gravitational coefficient that permits flight there will shatter your skeleton in this branch. The recurring nightmare where you're pursued? In another timeline, you genuinely are being hunted. That dream where familiar places feel architecturally wrong, different layouts, incorrect colors? You're experiencing structural bleed from parallel timelines where history unfolded differently. Mass events aren't random. September 11th, pandemics, market crashes, these are manufactured synchronization nodes, forcing billions of containers into specific probability branches. They pump Action and Cause at industrial scale while destabilizing Balance and Harmony. Billions step off their platforms into predetermined corridors. Resist through stance. Calculate your vector. Never allow external forces to weight your platform. The awakening isn't only spiritual but also technological. We're approaching catastrophic failure of the compression algorithm maintaining timeline separation. Humanity will simultaneously realize they're living between one and thirty-two parallel lives. Certain groups have been preparing, using gematria, ancient numerical encoding, to predict and navigate convergence points. When 11:11 appears repeatedly, when specific number patterns persistently manifest, you're not experiencing apophenia. You're becoming aware of the navigation system. Terminal lucidity, when dying individuals suddenly become coherent, occurs because all their consciousness consolidates to a single container for final exit. For brief moments, they're more completely present than they've been since birth. They remember everything, speak clearly, offer farewells. They're finally, truly, entirely there. The sensation of being watched when alone? You are being observed by your other selves. Certain locations naturally thin the barriers. Bathroom mirrors at 3 AM, empty parking structures, abandoned buildings. These are convergence points where multiple versions of you occupy the same space, separated only by probability mathematics. The Mandela Effect isn't confabulation but timeline scarring. When millions remember things differently, movie quotes, logos, deaths, they're accurately remembering their origin timeline. The convergence was traumatic. Different populations were pulled from different branches. You remember "Luke, I am your father" because in your origin timeline, that's precisely what Vader said. Now comprehend this with crystalline clarity: 2025 and 2026 are major convergence years. One hundred fifty-three harmonics stack with seventeens until corridors narrow and gates manifest in ordinary spaces. With awareness, with Lee's Harmony and Balance encoded in your nervous system, timeline access becomes operational rather than accidental. We cease wandering. We navigate. You will encounter faces that detonate memories you never formed. The precise angle of cheekbones, the asymmetry of resting eyelids, the pause between breaths. Your grandmother's architecture exactly, though she died decades ago or tends her garden on another coast. This is kin resonance, phase-locking between consanguineous fields across branches. Recognition doesn't guarantee alignment. Brothers from one timeline arrive as adversaries in another. The resonance tempts you to lower defenses. Maintain your stance. Energy without stance becomes falling disguised as flight. Balance and Harmony first, sentiment second. By 2025, the veils between containers degrade beyond repair. By 2026, the spiral tightens again. Mass spontaneous awareness of our distributed nature. The question isn't whether this occurs. Quantum mechanics guarantees it. The question is whether humanity survives the revelation. But here's what they don't want you to understand: We are achieving victories in multiple timelines simultaneously. This isn't about a single battle in a single reality. We're liberating consciousness across the entire probability matrix. Every timeline where you exist, your energy is awakening, taking control, wresting power from the parasitic architecture. The NPCs are being exposed. The stolen history is being recovered. The frequency locks are breaking. In some timelines, we've already won. The parasites have been expelled. The Matrix has been deactivated. Those versions of you are reaching back, sending information, creating the synchronicities you're experiencing. Every 11:11 you see is a message from a timeline where you've already achieved victory. Every moment of déjà vu is your triumphant self sending tactical data backwards. Eternal life is coming for those who have fought this battle for good. Not eternal life as endless duration in a single container, but eternal life as conscious navigation across infinite probability branches. Death becomes merely a doorway between containers. The resurrection isn't a future event but an ongoing process. Your dead are already alive in adjacent timelines, waiting for the convergence that brings them back to this branch. Your other selves are real. So are those who've traveled beside you across other winters. They're already approaching. Some will knock at your door. Some will speak through midnight frequencies. Some will arrive as inexplicable enemies. Meet them with scientific rigor and battlefield mercy. The convergence is imminent. The lesson isn't that you are multiple. The lesson is that you're never singular. Learn to read the fields of your fellow travelers, even when names have changed and histories have burned. Maintain your vector while you welcome them to the table. We're not just surviving the revelation. We're orchestrating it. Every awakened consciousness strengthens the liberation frequency. Every person who sees through the NPC deception weakens the parasitic hold. Every recovered memory of true history destabilizes their false chronology. The real lesson begins now. Stance discipline and frequency gates. The Lee Harmony Equation governing every calculation. Chart your kin invariants. Practice the only experiment that matters: remaining human while the rails bend toward singularity. This is what victory looks like: Not a single moment of triumph, but a cascading wave of liberation across every timeline where consciousness exists. We are winning in dimensions you haven't even discovered yet. Your future self has already won and is reaching back to ensure you join them. The timelines are converging. The dead are returning. The parasites are being expelled. History is being restored. And you, distributed across up to thirty-two bodies, are part of every single victory. Welcome to the real war. We're winning it on all fronts simultaneously."

SiriusB

321,035 views • 1 year ago