Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

Go Home

Obamacare didn’t just change insurance—it changed your doctor. Private practices didn’t disappear. They were engineered out. Obamacare wasn’t just about coverage. It was about control. Independent doctors were buried under regulations, forced into massive hospital systems, and trapped in top-down mandates driven by administrators instead of patient care. That’s...

RenzTom's profile picture

Tom Renz

362,141 subscribers

59,384 views • 8 months ago •via X (Twitter)

Health & WellnessNews & PoliticsScience & Technology
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

I asked Professor Angus Dalgleish what the blind spot was that had doctors sending sick people home instead of treating them. He said early treatment has always been the answer for everything, cancer, flu, and the common cold. This was the first disease where medicine did the opposite. Patients were told to go home and wait until their lips turned blue before coming back for a ventilator. No ivermectin. No treatment of any kind until the patient was already critical. He said it came from the top down, through the WHO and the government agencies, until doctors were simply obeying orders. The ones who refused and treated patients anyway watched some of them recover within hours. Dalgleish gave ivermectin to severely ill patients himself and they were better within two days. Those doctors were hounded instead of heard. He told me the more distance he gets from it, the more it looks like medical incompetence that became medical negligence, and once they were warned in writing and kept going, criminal medical negligence on a grand scale.
2:04

I asked Professor Angus Dalgleish what the blind spot was that had doctors sending sick people home instead of treating them. He said early treatment has always been the answer for everything, cancer, flu, and the common cold. This was the first disease where medicine did the opposite. Patients were told to go home and wait until their lips turned blue before coming back for a ventilator. No ivermectin. No treatment of any kind until the patient was already critical. He said it came from the top down, through the WHO and the government agencies, until doctors were simply obeying orders. The ones who refused and treated patients anyway watched some of them recover within hours. Dalgleish gave ivermectin to severely ill patients himself and they were better within two days. Those doctors were hounded instead of heard. He told me the more distance he gets from it, the more it looks like medical incompetence that became medical negligence, and once they were warned in writing and kept going, criminal medical negligence on a grand scale.

Del Bigtree

32,240 views • 29 days ago

When the flu shot does the opposite of what it promises… New York Governor Kathy Hochul proudly rolled up her sleeve for the cameras. But optics shouldn’t be the focus. Efficacy should. So how is this year’s flu shot actually performing? Negatively. One of the largest recent studies followed 50,000 Cleveland Clinic employees during the 2024–2025 flu season. About 80% got the flu shot. The rest didn’t. The result won't surprise any of you. Those who got the shot had a 27% higher risk of getting the flu. Not only did it fail to protect but it was associated with more flu, not less. Negative efficacy. Every year, we’re told this is the tool and every year, it misses the mark. This year, the data suggests it made things worse. So maybe the problem isn’t vaccine “hesitancy.” Maybe it’s blind faith in a product that keeps failing while officials smile for the cameras and call it leadership. Asking hard questions isn’t reckless, but ignoring the answers is.
1:09

When the flu shot does the opposite of what it promises… New York Governor Kathy Hochul proudly rolled up her sleeve for the cameras. But optics shouldn’t be the focus. Efficacy should. So how is this year’s flu shot actually performing? Negatively. One of the largest recent studies followed 50,000 Cleveland Clinic employees during the 2024–2025 flu season. About 80% got the flu shot. The rest didn’t. The result won't surprise any of you. Those who got the shot had a 27% higher risk of getting the flu. Not only did it fail to protect but it was associated with more flu, not less. Negative efficacy. Every year, we’re told this is the tool and every year, it misses the mark. This year, the data suggests it made things worse. So maybe the problem isn’t vaccine “hesitancy.” Maybe it’s blind faith in a product that keeps failing while officials smile for the cameras and call it leadership. Asking hard questions isn’t reckless, but ignoring the answers is.

The HighWire

26,759 views • 8 months ago

Raise your hand if you’re done with flu shots forever!? 🙋🏻‍♂️ 🚨Unearthed ABC Report Reveals Flu Shots were ineffective and Linked to a Sharp Rise in Elderly Death Rates • Between 1980-2001, the percentage of seniors getting the flu shot exploded from 15% to 65% So seniors “dying” from the flu should go way down, right? —— WRONG! Instead, Flu Deaths continued to skyrocket • Concerned with these results, the corrupt NIH did a study adjusting for all kinds of factors to prove their flu shot was beneficial. —— “No matter how they crunched the numbers, they got the same disappointing result. Flu shots have not reduced deaths among the elderly.” • What did the NIH do next? —— they suppressed their own study • ABC interviewed Dr. Tom Rikert, the only co-author of that study no longer employed by the NIH —— Rikert says he thought their study would prove flu vaccinations would help — but it didn’t. In fact, the same results were true in EVERY COUNTRY they studied (Australia, France, Canada, and the UK) • What did the CDC do? They came out and said, “Elderly should STILL get your flu shot”. If that’s not bad enough, they began recommending giving it to KIDS. — despite they didn’t work — despite that deaths continued to rise — despite their own studies showing they were harmful Why in the world would anyone ever get the flu shot ever again? Clip Jimmy Dore Show
3:28

Raise your hand if you’re done with flu shots forever!? 🙋🏻‍♂️ 🚨Unearthed ABC Report Reveals Flu Shots were ineffective and Linked to a Sharp Rise in Elderly Death Rates • Between 1980-2001, the percentage of seniors getting the flu shot exploded from 15% to 65% So seniors “dying” from the flu should go way down, right? —— WRONG! Instead, Flu Deaths continued to skyrocket • Concerned with these results, the corrupt NIH did a study adjusting for all kinds of factors to prove their flu shot was beneficial. —— “No matter how they crunched the numbers, they got the same disappointing result. Flu shots have not reduced deaths among the elderly.” • What did the NIH do next? —— they suppressed their own study • ABC interviewed Dr. Tom Rikert, the only co-author of that study no longer employed by the NIH —— Rikert says he thought their study would prove flu vaccinations would help — but it didn’t. In fact, the same results were true in EVERY COUNTRY they studied (Australia, France, Canada, and the UK) • What did the CDC do? They came out and said, “Elderly should STILL get your flu shot”. If that’s not bad enough, they began recommending giving it to KIDS. — despite they didn’t work — despite that deaths continued to rise — despite their own studies showing they were harmful Why in the world would anyone ever get the flu shot ever again? Clip Jimmy Dore Show

MJTruthUltra

65,330 views • 1 year ago

AOC has been sick for a while now. She sounds terrible. How many jabs did she get? She posted this video on Thursday talking about not having health insurance while she was a waitress because it was too expensive. AOC had access to Obamacare for years while she was a waitress. So why didn’t she take advantage of it? As a politician, AOC has strongly defended Obamacare. If Obamacare is so great, why wasn’t she on it when she was a waitress? The answer is AOC has been caught lying again. Either she’s lying about not having health insurance when she was a waitress or she’s lying about Obamacare being great. Both can’t be true. If Obamacare is great, then she lied about not being able to afford health insurance. If Obamacare sucks, then she lied about it being great. Here’s AOC’s new quote about not having health insurance (she says people she worked with didn’t have it either): “It really wasn’t that long ago that I didn’t have any health insurance at all when I was a waitress, and that I couldn’t afford health insurance so I just went without. And, frankly, no one I knew that I worked with had health insurance either because they couldn’t afford it either.” The truth likely is that AOC didn’t have health insurance until around when she got elected to Congress and that’s because Obamacare does suck. Which means the truth also is AOC has been lying to the American people for many years now about Obamacare being great. Now—how many jabs did AOC get and has she been getting boosters? Because she ain’t looking good. (aoc on TT)
1:01

AOC has been sick for a while now. She sounds terrible. How many jabs did she get? She posted this video on Thursday talking about not having health insurance while she was a waitress because it was too expensive. AOC had access to Obamacare for years while she was a waitress. So why didn’t she take advantage of it? As a politician, AOC has strongly defended Obamacare. If Obamacare is so great, why wasn’t she on it when she was a waitress? The answer is AOC has been caught lying again. Either she’s lying about not having health insurance when she was a waitress or she’s lying about Obamacare being great. Both can’t be true. If Obamacare is great, then she lied about not being able to afford health insurance. If Obamacare sucks, then she lied about it being great. Here’s AOC’s new quote about not having health insurance (she says people she worked with didn’t have it either): “It really wasn’t that long ago that I didn’t have any health insurance at all when I was a waitress, and that I couldn’t afford health insurance so I just went without. And, frankly, no one I knew that I worked with had health insurance either because they couldn’t afford it either.” The truth likely is that AOC didn’t have health insurance until around when she got elected to Congress and that’s because Obamacare does suck. Which means the truth also is AOC has been lying to the American people for many years now about Obamacare being great. Now—how many jabs did AOC get and has she been getting boosters? Because she ain’t looking good. (aoc on TT)

Paul A. Szypula 🇺🇸

466,128 views • 5 months ago

Dr. Sherri Tenpenny studied 20+ years of CDC data—and she uncovered the TRUTH about flu shots. “It doesn’t do anything except make you sick.” “It’s really not necessary.” “The CDC has about 120 testing centers out there for influenza season.” “So if you have a runny nose, cough, fever, chills, you can go into one of these centers. They’ll swab your nose, swab your throat, put it in a test tube and send it to the CDC to be evaluated.” “The first thing that happens is they test it to see, is your illness … caused by a flu virus or something else?” “They test about 600,000 of these swabs per year.” “86% of the time, it’s something else.” “Only 14% of the time, if you get sick during flu season, is your illness caused by an influenza virus—which means if you choose to get a flu shot, it will protect you maybe 14% of the time.” “And up until Secretary Kennedy took all the mercury out of the flu shots, which was this year … if you got a multi-dose flu shot, you got doses of mercury every year from that flu vaccine.” Dr Sherri Tenpenny Alex Clark
2:22

Dr. Sherri Tenpenny studied 20+ years of CDC data—and she uncovered the TRUTH about flu shots. “It doesn’t do anything except make you sick.” “It’s really not necessary.” “The CDC has about 120 testing centers out there for influenza season.” “So if you have a runny nose, cough, fever, chills, you can go into one of these centers. They’ll swab your nose, swab your throat, put it in a test tube and send it to the CDC to be evaluated.” “The first thing that happens is they test it to see, is your illness … caused by a flu virus or something else?” “They test about 600,000 of these swabs per year.” “86% of the time, it’s something else.” “Only 14% of the time, if you get sick during flu season, is your illness caused by an influenza virus—which means if you choose to get a flu shot, it will protect you maybe 14% of the time.” “And up until Secretary Kennedy took all the mercury out of the flu shots, which was this year … if you got a multi-dose flu shot, you got doses of mercury every year from that flu vaccine.” Dr Sherri Tenpenny Alex Clark

Children’s Health Defense

33,527 views • 8 months ago

WHEN MEDICINE BECAME MURDER FOR MONEY Melissa Redpill WHISTLEBLOWER Gail Macrae: "I am a registered nurse with years on the front lines...ZERO patients died FROM COVID. They were KILLED by Remdesivir and ventilators. Hospitals were half-empty the entire time. But the deadly protocols, forced isolation from family, and experimental drugs kept rolling — because every “COVID label” meant massive government bonuses. This wasn’t medicine. This was MURDER FOR MONEY. Patients came in with the flu or pneumonia. They left in body bags after being poisoned and suffocated by hospital policy. I saw it with my own eyes. I watched it happen day after day. Demand justice. Demand the truth. Demand the names of every administrator, doctor, and politician who profited while our loved ones were slaughtered. The COVID hospital scam was one of the greatest crimes in history. H/T: Valerie Anne Smith
9:59

WHEN MEDICINE BECAME MURDER FOR MONEY Melissa Redpill WHISTLEBLOWER Gail Macrae: "I am a registered nurse with years on the front lines...ZERO patients died FROM COVID. They were KILLED by Remdesivir and ventilators. Hospitals were half-empty the entire time. But the deadly protocols, forced isolation from family, and experimental drugs kept rolling — because every “COVID label” meant massive government bonuses. This wasn’t medicine. This was MURDER FOR MONEY. Patients came in with the flu or pneumonia. They left in body bags after being poisoned and suffocated by hospital policy. I saw it with my own eyes. I watched it happen day after day. Demand justice. Demand the truth. Demand the names of every administrator, doctor, and politician who profited while our loved ones were slaughtered. The COVID hospital scam was one of the greatest crimes in history. H/T: Valerie Anne Smith

Iam Breitbart

39,242 views • 3 months ago

💚🤝💚 Dr. Kirk Moore’s case being dismissed by Pam Bondi is a seismic moment, not just for him, but for everyone who’s been watching the COVID saga unfold with a healthy dose of skepticism. Moore was one of those doctors who refused to play along with the institutional script. He was accused of “fraud” for allegedly helping people avoid the COVID vaccine mandates, basically, he was giving people a way out when the system was hell-bent on forcing compliance, no matter the cost to individual autonomy or informed consent. Pam Bondi, a former Florida Attorney General, stepping in and dismissing the case is a signal flare. It means that, at least in this instance, the machinery of prosecution, fueled by political pressure and pharmaceutical interests, hit a wall. The charges didn’t stick, not because the facts changed, but because the tide is turning. People are finally starting to question whether the endless mandates, the forced shots, and the demonization of dissenting doctors were ever about public health, or just about control and profit and death. For those of us who’ve seen the real carnage, patients dying alone, families torn apart, people suffering from vaccine injuries that nobody wants to talk about, this is vindication. It’s a crack in the dam. It means that maybe, just maybe, the era of silencing doctors who actually listen to their patients and question the narrative is coming to an end. But don’t get it twisted: this isn’t the system admitting it was wrong. It’s the system realizing it can’t keep the lid on forever. The truth has a way of clawing its way to the surface, no matter how many careers they try to destroy along the way. So what does this mean? It means the fight isn’t over, but the people who stood up, who risked everything to do what they thought was right, are starting to see justice. And for every paramedic, nurse, or doctor who watched the chaos unfold and wondered if they were the crazy ones for questioning it all, this is proof… we weren’t crazy. WE were just ahead of the curve. God bless Video for my friend Dr Moore-
1:35

💚🤝💚 Dr. Kirk Moore’s case being dismissed by Pam Bondi is a seismic moment, not just for him, but for everyone who’s been watching the COVID saga unfold with a healthy dose of skepticism. Moore was one of those doctors who refused to play along with the institutional script. He was accused of “fraud” for allegedly helping people avoid the COVID vaccine mandates, basically, he was giving people a way out when the system was hell-bent on forcing compliance, no matter the cost to individual autonomy or informed consent. Pam Bondi, a former Florida Attorney General, stepping in and dismissing the case is a signal flare. It means that, at least in this instance, the machinery of prosecution, fueled by political pressure and pharmaceutical interests, hit a wall. The charges didn’t stick, not because the facts changed, but because the tide is turning. People are finally starting to question whether the endless mandates, the forced shots, and the demonization of dissenting doctors were ever about public health, or just about control and profit and death. For those of us who’ve seen the real carnage, patients dying alone, families torn apart, people suffering from vaccine injuries that nobody wants to talk about, this is vindication. It’s a crack in the dam. It means that maybe, just maybe, the era of silencing doctors who actually listen to their patients and question the narrative is coming to an end. But don’t get it twisted: this isn’t the system admitting it was wrong. It’s the system realizing it can’t keep the lid on forever. The truth has a way of clawing its way to the surface, no matter how many careers they try to destroy along the way. So what does this mean? It means the fight isn’t over, but the people who stood up, who risked everything to do what they thought was right, are starting to see justice. And for every paramedic, nurse, or doctor who watched the chaos unfold and wondered if they were the crazy ones for questioning it all, this is proof… we weren’t crazy. WE were just ahead of the curve. God bless Video for my friend Dr Moore-

Harry Fisher

53,624 views • 1 year ago

While patients wait years for surgery and months to see a specialist, Wes Streeting and Keir Starmer are threatening to cut the number of NHS specialist doctor training jobs. Most people don’t realise this, but doctors can’t just become Consultants, Surgeons or GPs on their own. They have to get a speciality training job first. These jobs are controlled and capped by the Government. So when the Government talks about cutting speciality training jobs, what they are really talking about is cutting the number of future specialist doctors in this country. At a time when the NHS already doesn’t have enough doctors. At a time when waiting lists are in the millions. At a time when patients are waiting months just to see a specialist and years for operations. Cutting the number of specialist training jobs will not fix the NHS. It will make waiting lists longer. It will make it harder to see a doctor. It will make the NHS worse for patients. Threatening to reduce the number of future doctors while patients are already struggling to access care is not just a deliberate workforce policy decision. It is a direct threat to the NHS and to the public who rely on it, coming from a ‘Labour’ Government.
1:35

While patients wait years for surgery and months to see a specialist, Wes Streeting and Keir Starmer are threatening to cut the number of NHS specialist doctor training jobs. Most people don’t realise this, but doctors can’t just become Consultants, Surgeons or GPs on their own. They have to get a speciality training job first. These jobs are controlled and capped by the Government. So when the Government talks about cutting speciality training jobs, what they are really talking about is cutting the number of future specialist doctors in this country. At a time when the NHS already doesn’t have enough doctors. At a time when waiting lists are in the millions. At a time when patients are waiting months just to see a specialist and years for operations. Cutting the number of specialist training jobs will not fix the NHS. It will make waiting lists longer. It will make it harder to see a doctor. It will make the NHS worse for patients. Threatening to reduce the number of future doctors while patients are already struggling to access care is not just a deliberate workforce policy decision. It is a direct threat to the NHS and to the public who rely on it, coming from a ‘Labour’ Government.

Dr Haseena Wazir

23,143 views • 5 months ago

The Truth Is Out... The Flu Vaccine Not Only DOESN'T Prevent Influenza & DOESN'T Lessen It's Symptoms... If You Get The Flu Vaccine You Are 27% MORE Likely To Get Influenza. A Recent Cleveland Clinic Study Reveals The Influenza Vaccine Carries A Negative Efficacy Of 26.9%! From The Study..."53,402 Cleveland Clinic employees were followed & studied for 25 weeks during the 2024-2025 flu season. Over the course of the study the cumulative incidence of influenza increased more rapidly among the vaccinated than the unvaccinated. Yielding a calculated vaccine effectiveness of −26.9%." The flu shot not only primes you for flu, it primes you for Coronavirus at 36% increased rate. Nordic Cochrane Group & British Medical Journal both have found, people are 4.4 times more likely to get a non flu infection. Many people get the flu shot & then get sick. They are getting an indistinguishable illness from the flu. The flu shot gives you pathogenic priming. It injures your immune system so that you're more likely to get a non flu viral upper respiratory infection. In fact, the PENTAGON published a study, in which they said the flu shot not only primes you for flu, it primes you for coronavirus. To determine military readiness, they had a placebo group & a vaccine group, to determine if the flu shot was protective against Coronavirus. The results showed those who received the flu shot were 36% more likely to get Coronavirus. That is not a lone study, there are at least 6 other major studies showing the same thing, if you get the flu shot, you're more likely to get Coronavirus. Flu Shot Ingredients: If you wouldn't eat or drink it, you wouldn't want to inject it either. MDCK: Canine Cocker Spaniel Kidney DNA M59 Adjuvant Squalene Oil: GMO Microbial caused 95% Gulf War Syndrome to Soldiers. MSG: Neurotoxin, Reproductive & Developmental Harm. Formaldehyde: Carcinogen & Poisonous to Internal Organs. Thimerosal Mercury: One of The Most Poisonous Substances Known. Even Minute Amounts Cause Damage. Aluminum: Cause of brain damage, dementia, seizures, coma & autism. Baculovirus Cell DNA: Virus insect pathogens. Neomycin Sulfate: Antibiotic that blocks B6 absorption causing uptake error epilepsy & antibiotic resistance. Polysorbate 80: Carcinogen that crosses the blood brain barrier. Phosphates: Toxic to bones & organs 👇Flu Vaccine 2024-2025 Negative Efficacy👇 👇Dept Of Defense Flu Vaccine Study👇 👇Flu Vaccine Causes 4.4 Times More Illness👇 Speakers: The Jimmy Dore Show & Dr John Campbell
1:23

The Truth Is Out... The Flu Vaccine Not Only DOESN'T Prevent Influenza & DOESN'T Lessen It's Symptoms... If You Get The Flu Vaccine You Are 27% MORE Likely To Get Influenza. A Recent Cleveland Clinic Study Reveals The Influenza Vaccine Carries A Negative Efficacy Of 26.9%! From The Study..."53,402 Cleveland Clinic employees were followed & studied for 25 weeks during the 2024-2025 flu season. Over the course of the study the cumulative incidence of influenza increased more rapidly among the vaccinated than the unvaccinated. Yielding a calculated vaccine effectiveness of −26.9%." The flu shot not only primes you for flu, it primes you for Coronavirus at 36% increased rate. Nordic Cochrane Group & British Medical Journal both have found, people are 4.4 times more likely to get a non flu infection. Many people get the flu shot & then get sick. They are getting an indistinguishable illness from the flu. The flu shot gives you pathogenic priming. It injures your immune system so that you're more likely to get a non flu viral upper respiratory infection. In fact, the PENTAGON published a study, in which they said the flu shot not only primes you for flu, it primes you for coronavirus. To determine military readiness, they had a placebo group & a vaccine group, to determine if the flu shot was protective against Coronavirus. The results showed those who received the flu shot were 36% more likely to get Coronavirus. That is not a lone study, there are at least 6 other major studies showing the same thing, if you get the flu shot, you're more likely to get Coronavirus. Flu Shot Ingredients: If you wouldn't eat or drink it, you wouldn't want to inject it either. MDCK: Canine Cocker Spaniel Kidney DNA M59 Adjuvant Squalene Oil: GMO Microbial caused 95% Gulf War Syndrome to Soldiers. MSG: Neurotoxin, Reproductive & Developmental Harm. Formaldehyde: Carcinogen & Poisonous to Internal Organs. Thimerosal Mercury: One of The Most Poisonous Substances Known. Even Minute Amounts Cause Damage. Aluminum: Cause of brain damage, dementia, seizures, coma & autism. Baculovirus Cell DNA: Virus insect pathogens. Neomycin Sulfate: Antibiotic that blocks B6 absorption causing uptake error epilepsy & antibiotic resistance. Polysorbate 80: Carcinogen that crosses the blood brain barrier. Phosphates: Toxic to bones & organs 👇Flu Vaccine 2024-2025 Negative Efficacy👇 👇Dept Of Defense Flu Vaccine Study👇 👇Flu Vaccine Causes 4.4 Times More Illness👇 Speakers: The Jimmy Dore Show & Dr John Campbell

Valerie Anne Smith

38,938 views • 1 year ago

The conversation shifted, but the underlying theme stayed the same—how the systems in place aren't what they seem. Howard opened up about his view of vaccines, painting a darker picture of their purpose. “The entire process that they’re working on, it’s not to build humanity up. I don’t see it. It’s more so to tear us down,” he said. Maher pressed him: “Who are we talking about?” Howard didn’t miss a beat. “I’m still talking about the government as a whole, either Democrat or Republican," he said. "Because if you go back to, like, for me, when the vaccines first were coming out, and I was talking about—not the COVID vaccine, just me dealing with my children—about, am I going to do vaccines to give them in school? And I was like, no, I don’t want to give them the MMR and all of that.” Maher agreed: “They don’t need it now.” Howard then shared a little-known shift that he believes changed everything about vaccines—and their effects. “No! And when we were kids back in 1969 when I was born, and they gave me the shot, it was delivered with duck embryo DNA. Then in 1970, when they got the abortion clinics, they started using human DNA.” He explained the critical difference: “The duck embryo DNA would not bond. It would deliver the vaccine, it would deliver the little protein that was necessary, but it didn’t have any match to your DNA, so it would be taken out of the body. But because they’re using human DNA cells from the abortion clinics, those now bond into our cells and try to bond with it.” According to Howard, the consequences of that change are now visible everywhere. “That’s why we have all the psoriasis now. Did you see that much psoriasis back in the ’80s? Back when you were—when I was a child—I didn’t see it.”
1:30

The conversation shifted, but the underlying theme stayed the same—how the systems in place aren't what they seem. Howard opened up about his view of vaccines, painting a darker picture of their purpose. “The entire process that they’re working on, it’s not to build humanity up. I don’t see it. It’s more so to tear us down,” he said. Maher pressed him: “Who are we talking about?” Howard didn’t miss a beat. “I’m still talking about the government as a whole, either Democrat or Republican," he said. "Because if you go back to, like, for me, when the vaccines first were coming out, and I was talking about—not the COVID vaccine, just me dealing with my children—about, am I going to do vaccines to give them in school? And I was like, no, I don’t want to give them the MMR and all of that.” Maher agreed: “They don’t need it now.” Howard then shared a little-known shift that he believes changed everything about vaccines—and their effects. “No! And when we were kids back in 1969 when I was born, and they gave me the shot, it was delivered with duck embryo DNA. Then in 1970, when they got the abortion clinics, they started using human DNA.” He explained the critical difference: “The duck embryo DNA would not bond. It would deliver the vaccine, it would deliver the little protein that was necessary, but it didn’t have any match to your DNA, so it would be taken out of the body. But because they’re using human DNA cells from the abortion clinics, those now bond into our cells and try to bond with it.” According to Howard, the consequences of that change are now visible everywhere. “That’s why we have all the psoriasis now. Did you see that much psoriasis back in the ’80s? Back when you were—when I was a child—I didn’t see it.”

Vigilant Fox 🦊

294,717 views • 1 year ago

While you wait weeks to see a GP, NHS doctors in England are being forced into unemployment; blocked by Government caps that stop them from furthering their training to become specialist Consultants/GPs. This year, there were around 30,000 doctors applying for 10,000 speciality training places. That means thousands of capable doctors ready to serve the public and the NHS are being turned away. Every rejected doctor is a lost opportunity to cut waiting lists, staff wards safely and bring the NHS back from crisis. And Wes Streeting’s response? Just 2,000 extra speciality training places over 3 years. That will not fix the doctor unemployment crisis in England. It will continue to leave patients waiting months for care and will push doctors out of the NHS altogether. This is one of the reasons why NHS resident doctors are going back out on strike. Doctors want to work. Patients want care. It’s the Government that’s standing in the way. #EndTrainingCrisis
0:39

While you wait weeks to see a GP, NHS doctors in England are being forced into unemployment; blocked by Government caps that stop them from furthering their training to become specialist Consultants/GPs. This year, there were around 30,000 doctors applying for 10,000 speciality training places. That means thousands of capable doctors ready to serve the public and the NHS are being turned away. Every rejected doctor is a lost opportunity to cut waiting lists, staff wards safely and bring the NHS back from crisis. And Wes Streeting’s response? Just 2,000 extra speciality training places over 3 years. That will not fix the doctor unemployment crisis in England. It will continue to leave patients waiting months for care and will push doctors out of the NHS altogether. This is one of the reasons why NHS resident doctors are going back out on strike. Doctors want to work. Patients want care. It’s the Government that’s standing in the way. #EndTrainingCrisis

Dr Haseena Wazir

41,572 views • 10 months ago

Left: Wes Streeting and Keir Starmer make the BMA doctors strike about pay Right: Susanna Reid, "More than half of year 2 doctors have no job to go to next month" Labour are pitting the public against doctors on the grounds of pay, when the strikes are about more than pay, they're about the lack of jobs for doctors In this case, it's a lack of jobs in hospitals. But it's also about a lack of GP jobs, because Wes Streeting has limited the ability of GP practices to hire more GPs (while giving them budgets to hire other staff) We have a shortage of hospital doctors, we have a shortage of GP doctors, and it is Labour policy under Keir Starmer and Wes Streeting has worsened this problem The worst part, Streeting and Starmer both using the rise in flu cases to suggest that strain in hospitals is the doctors fault But when you look at the data, there have been nearly 1,000,000 patients treated in corridors this year It didn't just happen overnight, Labour, like the Conservatives before them, continue to underfund the NHS And with at least 10% of the NHS budget goes to private contracts, instead of investing in the NHS, by using private services, Labour continue to spend more on private health services than on the NHS: how is it efficient to pay more for the same service? Sorry Labour voters, but if you go with the line it's all about pay, you're missing the bigger picture, and you're putting your loyalty towards Starmer and Streeting who are misrepresenting what's going on, and distrusting the very people who spend their entire lives looking after other people, doctors
1:01

Left: Wes Streeting and Keir Starmer make the BMA doctors strike about pay Right: Susanna Reid, "More than half of year 2 doctors have no job to go to next month" Labour are pitting the public against doctors on the grounds of pay, when the strikes are about more than pay, they're about the lack of jobs for doctors In this case, it's a lack of jobs in hospitals. But it's also about a lack of GP jobs, because Wes Streeting has limited the ability of GP practices to hire more GPs (while giving them budgets to hire other staff) We have a shortage of hospital doctors, we have a shortage of GP doctors, and it is Labour policy under Keir Starmer and Wes Streeting has worsened this problem The worst part, Streeting and Starmer both using the rise in flu cases to suggest that strain in hospitals is the doctors fault But when you look at the data, there have been nearly 1,000,000 patients treated in corridors this year It didn't just happen overnight, Labour, like the Conservatives before them, continue to underfund the NHS And with at least 10% of the NHS budget goes to private contracts, instead of investing in the NHS, by using private services, Labour continue to spend more on private health services than on the NHS: how is it efficient to pay more for the same service? Sorry Labour voters, but if you go with the line it's all about pay, you're missing the bigger picture, and you're putting your loyalty towards Starmer and Streeting who are misrepresenting what's going on, and distrusting the very people who spend their entire lives looking after other people, doctors

Farrukh

67,915 views • 9 months ago

Joe Rogan and Dr. Suzanne Humphries on the Covid vaccine and the propaganda behind it. "You know that they're giving COVID vaccines to 6 month old children now. We know how bad it is - we know it ruins stem cells in pregnant women - they don't give stem cells to their baby - the placentas no longer have stem cells." "Nothing bad about the COVID shot is being talked about when we got Kevin McKernan and all these people looking at it (listing off ingredients in the COVID vaccine) - it's a definite gain of function - but nope - we gotta definitely put it on the baby vaccine schedule." "BECAUSE ANY DOUBTS WHETHER OR NOT WELL FUNDED ABOUT THE VACCINATION MUST NOT BE ALLOWED TO EXIST." Joe: "That sounds like a religion. It sounds like a crazy cult that the whole world's been sucked into. Giving a COVID shot to a baby today is insane." Dr. Humphries: "Three of them." Joe: "Are doctors really recommending this?" Dr. Humphries: "There's a group of people called ACIP - doctors usually with vaccine interests in their bank accounts that make the recommendations for the vaccines." "So if your doctor follows the ACIP program you have to be offered that vaccine - and now that doctor is likely to lose $250,000 a year if they don't do that because there's incentive given to hospitals and doctors."
1:59

Joe Rogan and Dr. Suzanne Humphries on the Covid vaccine and the propaganda behind it. "You know that they're giving COVID vaccines to 6 month old children now. We know how bad it is - we know it ruins stem cells in pregnant women - they don't give stem cells to their baby - the placentas no longer have stem cells." "Nothing bad about the COVID shot is being talked about when we got Kevin McKernan and all these people looking at it (listing off ingredients in the COVID vaccine) - it's a definite gain of function - but nope - we gotta definitely put it on the baby vaccine schedule." "BECAUSE ANY DOUBTS WHETHER OR NOT WELL FUNDED ABOUT THE VACCINATION MUST NOT BE ALLOWED TO EXIST." Joe: "That sounds like a religion. It sounds like a crazy cult that the whole world's been sucked into. Giving a COVID shot to a baby today is insane." Dr. Humphries: "Three of them." Joe: "Are doctors really recommending this?" Dr. Humphries: "There's a group of people called ACIP - doctors usually with vaccine interests in their bank accounts that make the recommendations for the vaccines." "So if your doctor follows the ACIP program you have to be offered that vaccine - and now that doctor is likely to lose $250,000 a year if they don't do that because there's incentive given to hospitals and doctors."

Barbie True Blue

192,365 views • 1 year ago

🚨 “YOU WERE LIED TO” Millions didn’t take the vaccine out of fear for themselves. They took it to “protect others.” To protect parents. Grandparents. The vulnerable. That was the message. Repeated relentlessly. “Stop the spread.” “Protect your loved ones.” “Do your part.” But now? Voices are emerging saying that claim was never properly proven — and may never have been true in the way it was presented. If that’s the case, then this isn’t a misunderstanding. It’s a breach of trust on a global scale. Because people didn’t just make a medical decision — they made a moral one. And they made it based on what they were told. The real question now isn’t just what happened… It’s why people were so certain when the evidence wasn’t.
1:00

🚨 “YOU WERE LIED TO” Millions didn’t take the vaccine out of fear for themselves. They took it to “protect others.” To protect parents. Grandparents. The vulnerable. That was the message. Repeated relentlessly. “Stop the spread.” “Protect your loved ones.” “Do your part.” But now? Voices are emerging saying that claim was never properly proven — and may never have been true in the way it was presented. If that’s the case, then this isn’t a misunderstanding. It’s a breach of trust on a global scale. Because people didn’t just make a medical decision — they made a moral one. And they made it based on what they were told. The real question now isn’t just what happened… It’s why people were so certain when the evidence wasn’t.

Jim Ferguson

22,972 views • 5 months ago