Occasionally (not too often)...I share a video clip that should really be shared with every human on the planet. Seriously. This is one of those - the only clip people need to see, on Rockefeller's Climate Change project:

I recognize this and it is why we must challenge this false narrative continuously.

There is evidence of Roman vineyards in southern England. This means sometime around zero AD, give or take a couple hundred years, southern England was warm enough climate to grow grapes. Currently this is associated with a near Mediterranean climate. These 3 dates (0ad 1000ad 2000ad) suggest a 1000 year natural cycle of climate warming. When we look at history changing events, they come at these times, and they come also in between these times - the cold periods. This is likely because weather extremes affects human civilisation.

As long as politicians, companies, academics, universities, lobbyists, political parties, government NGO’s, radicals and the well connected can make millions of dollars selling you climate change, they will continue selling you climate change.

I’m trying to find the document, but it was decided by the elite over 50 years ago that they needed a common cause for everyone to be scared of, to gain control and transfer wealth. They decided on climate change.

The Club of Rome.

The Global Warming lie...👀

Just a reminder.... How much C02 is in the atmosphere? ----> O.04 %....👀 And human activity is responsible for 3% of the 0.04%... Ya...😡😡😡

My god, how many profited from this scam? This is horrible and insidious. Canadas Carney is still forcing this onto Canadians.

The biggest lie is that Big Oil hates climate change measures. The most profitable thing possible for Big Oil is if they have to sell less oil at higher prices. The main purpose of the Standard Oil trust was to restrict production and keep prices up.

This is Dr. David Deming, a geologist and geophysicist from the University of Oklahoma, testifying on December 6, 2006 before the Senate Committee on Environment and Public Works, then chaired by Senator James Inhofe

Did we ever find this money? Not ONE BILLION $$$ but 41$$ of them!

I wouldn't worry too much, because the power of Silicon Valley to push the need for data centers, which obviously will increase warming, will probably lead to the rediscovery of the Medieval warm period by many and dampen Climate Change hysteria.

Woman who helped build the World Economic Forum’s Great Reset exposes ESG labels were all a scam based on nothing to make money “They're lying to the public. They manufactured a climate crisis. It's a multi-trillion dollar industrial complex.”

@wickedfairysad 1989 UN predicted by 2000 #ENTIRE #NATIONS would be wiped out off face of 🌎 #EU UrsulavonderLayen openly said: Stop economic #HUMAN #GROWTH to save 🌎 Science say interference with climate Co2 already too low Our species will survive when the lot of them gets #Dissolved #WHO 👇🏻

That's why it changed from GLOBAL WARMING to CLIMATE CHANGE. People liked the idea of warming but were frightening by change!

"as a result of this (MSM) the public has been vastly misinformed. Global weather patterns are complex and poorly understood but we do know that throughout history warmer temperature has given more stable climate and increased human health and prospeity"

The Global Warming crisis eloquently summarized by Greta Thunberg...😯

Haha @grok will have a hissy fit. When I informed grok that it was basically a climate trol and full of shit, it replied "personal attacks aren't helpful". Grok isn't a person, proving that whoever wrote that indeed was a human. And a troll.

There is no Global Warming. The Earth score temperature changes by minuscule amounts. What people are doing to our weather to justify climate change is going to ultimately ruin our earth.

"The Earth climate system is complex and poorly understood." at 3.33 "There is no sound basis for predicting future climate change with any degree of certainty." at 4.01 He's right.

Corrupt climate 'scientists' are always scheming to: "HIDE THE DECLINE!!!" Advancing the political (and profitable) narrative (lie) is always more crucial to them than the pursuit of actual science. These frauds don't serve humanity, they serve only themselves!

Just traveled to Scandanavia from USA. We all agreed we were much more productive and felt better w warmer, longer days! Our science experiment agrees w these statements

When they have to "get rid of" inconvenient history,their cause is fraudulent.

I checked. Dr. David Deming is still alive. Here is my poor try at dispelling OVER POPULATION & CLIMATE CHANGE--->

This is pure gold. TY for unearthing & sharing it.

Club of Rome nailed it decades ago: 'The real enemy is humanity itself.' So they conjured the perfect crisis, airbrushed the Medieval Warm Period out of existence (thanks Dr. Deming for the receipts), and now we're all supposed to eat bugs, freeze in the dark, and thank them for 'saving' us from the weather. Rockefeller-funded fear porn meets Orwellian history rewrite. Peak Malthusian clown world — where the elites fly private while lecturing the rest of us on our carbon sins. Brilliant. Pass the popcorn (and the nuclear permits).

'Climate' = Geopolitics?

Klima

Bloody hell--lies, lies and more lies! The cover-ups, the rewriting of history, the demonizing of truth tellers. If people don't believe there is a determined group attempting to enslave us, take all our freedoms and knowledge from us, then, we're doomed.

I tried to follow the science, but it was simply not there. I then followed the money, and that's where I found the science. Climate scientists are just as easy to buy as politicians. Just ask the banking industry that has started to pour Billions £ into renewables.

@chatswithem Longer growing seasons produce more food for a population to thrive.

The truth will out from experts - this geo political 💩 needs to stop and those who know the truth need to come out of their polluted geo chemically engineered brain cells and stand up and FIGHT for our planet our fun our fresh air our fauna and flora - our very survival and screw these 3000 or so greedy corrupt data leviathans into oblivion

Full transcript: STATEMENT OF DAVID DEMING, Ph.D., UNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA, COLLEGE OF EARTH AND ENERGY Mr. Deming. Mr. Chairman, members of the committee, and distinguished guests, thank you for inviting me to testify today. I am a geologist and geophysicist. I have a Bachelor's Degree in geology from Indiana University and a Ph.D. in geophysics from the University of Utah. My field of specialization in geophysics is temperature and heat flow. In recent years, I have turned my studies to the history and philosophy of science. In 1995, I published a short paper in the academic journal, Science. In that study, I reviewed how borehole temperature data recorded a warming of about 1 C in North America over the last 100 to 150 years. The week the article appeared, I was contacted by a reporter for National Public Radio. He offered to interview me but only if I would state that warming was due to human activity. When I refused to do so, he hung up on me. I had another interesting experience around the time my paper in Science was published. I received an astonishing e- mail from a major researcher in the area of climate change. He said, ``We have to get rid of the Medieval Warm Period.'' The Medieval Warm Period was a time of unusually warm weather that began around 1000 A.D. and persisted until a cold period known as the Little Ice Age took hold in the 14th Century. Warmer climate brought a remarkable flowering of prosperity, knowledge, and art to Europe during the high Middle Ages. The existence of the Medieval Warm Period had been recognized in the scientific literature for decades, but now it was a major embarrassment to those maintaining that the 20th Century warming was truly anomalist. It had to ``be gotten rid of.'' In 1769, Joseph Priestley warned that scientists overly attached to a favored hypothesis would not hesitate to ``warp the whole course of nature.'' In 1999, Michael Mann and his colleagues published a reconstruction of past temperature in which the Medieval Warm Period simply vanished. This unique estimate became known as the hockey stick because of the shape of the temperature graph. Normally in science when you have a novel result that appears to overturn previous work, you have to demonstrate why the earlier work was wrong, but the work of Mann and his colleagues was initially accepted uncritically even though it contradicted the results of more than 100 previous studies. Other researchers have since reaffirmed that the Medieval Warm Period was both warm and global in its extent. There is an overwhelming bias today in the media regarding the issue of global warming. In the past 2 years, this bias has bloomed into an irrational hysteria. Every natural disaster that occurs is now linked with global warming no matter how tenuous or impossible the connection. As a result, the public has become vastly misinformed on this and other environmental issues. Earth's climate system is complex and poorly understood, but we do know that throughout human history, warmer temperatures have been associated with more stable climates and increased human health and prosperity. Colder temperatures have been correlated with climatic instability, famine, and increased human mortality. The amount of climatic warming that has taken place in the past 150 years is poorly constrained and its cause, human or natural, is unknown. There is no sound scientific basis for predicting future climate change with any degree of certainty. If the climate does warm, it is likely to be beneficial to humanity rather than harmful. In my opinion, it would be foolish to establish national energy policy on the basis of misinformation and irrational hysteria. Thank you. Senator Inhofe. Thank you very much. Thank you, Dr. Deming. Dr. Schrag.