Sensitive content

This media may contain sensitive content.

Video yükleniyor...

Video Yüklenemedi

Ana Sayfaya Dön

Officer Goro received a severe punishment Part - 2 🍆💦 #yaoi #gay #visualnovel #campbuddy #BLitsGames #Yoshinorinagira #Goronomoru

CarmenCant34132's profile picture

Lemillion

4,233 subscribers

21,340 görüntüleme • 17 gün önce •via X (Twitter)

NSFW#yaoi#gay#visualnovel#campbuddy#BLitsGames#Yoshinorinagira#Goronomoru
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Yorum

Yorum bulunmuyor

Orijinal gönderinin yorumları burada görünecek

Benzer Videolar

Part (2) #CherryTheeBoom plays audio of #G2T talking about #NoCap taking D*ck , but #NoCap continues to deny the allegations of him entertaining anything gay. Take a look! 🍆💦 😧 🌈 #Bigorecap #Bigolive #Bigousa #Bigo
4:36

Sensitive content

Part (2) #CherryTheeBoom plays audio of #G2T talking about #NoCap taking D*ck , but #NoCap continues to deny the allegations of him entertaining anything gay. Take a look! 🍆💦 😧 🌈 #Bigorecap #Bigolive #Bigousa #Bigo

BIGO RECAP

35,890 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce

Imperial War Museums you bunch of absolute homophobic twerps, stop centring cross dressing fetshists as anything to with history in the same way many gay men played a part in VSO or general duty. Watch this by Kenneth, then go and watch Privates on Parade you insufferable gender addled grievance gerbils. Cross dressing fetshishsm was not even vaguely the same as the treatment of gay men and women, and especially gay men, when it was a crime and the punishment severe. Honestly you can fuck off.
1:28

Imperial War Museums you bunch of absolute homophobic twerps, stop centring cross dressing fetshists as anything to with history in the same way many gay men played a part in VSO or general duty. Watch this by Kenneth, then go and watch Privates on Parade you insufferable gender addled grievance gerbils. Cross dressing fetshishsm was not even vaguely the same as the treatment of gay men and women, and especially gay men, when it was a crime and the punishment severe. Honestly you can fuck off.

Barry Wall

43,838 görüntüleme • 8 ay önce

Pulled Over on a Warrant, Then Claimed a Cop Stole $900 From His Cash. The Bodycam Changed Everything. Moncre Moon was arrested during a traffic stop after officers discovered he had an outstanding warrant. During the search, officers found $3,000 in cash on him. Moon immediately claimed $900 was missing. His supervisor reviewed the bodycam footage. Investigators say it showed Officer Henry Chapman palming the cash and hiding it inside the driver's-side door pocket of his patrol cruiser. Just 6 hours later, Chapman was arrested by his own department. He later entered an Alford plea to felony embezzlement, received 2 years of supervised probation, and resigned from the Charlotte-Mecklenburg Police Department. A badge doesn't put anyone above the law. Do you think the punishment matched the crime, or should officers who violate the public's trust face harsher consequences?
3:08

Pulled Over on a Warrant, Then Claimed a Cop Stole $900 From His Cash. The Bodycam Changed Everything. Moncre Moon was arrested during a traffic stop after officers discovered he had an outstanding warrant. During the search, officers found $3,000 in cash on him. Moon immediately claimed $900 was missing. His supervisor reviewed the bodycam footage. Investigators say it showed Officer Henry Chapman palming the cash and hiding it inside the driver's-side door pocket of his patrol cruiser. Just 6 hours later, Chapman was arrested by his own department. He later entered an Alford plea to felony embezzlement, received 2 years of supervised probation, and resigned from the Charlotte-Mecklenburg Police Department. A badge doesn't put anyone above the law. Do you think the punishment matched the crime, or should officers who violate the public's trust face harsher consequences?

✨️Serenitee♡Sam✨️

84,112 görüntüleme • 1 ay önce

HAPPY PRIDE MONTH 🥳💝🏳️‍🌈🌈 He wanted to train my hole for the main sex while he watches his favourite show (FOOTBALL ⚽) 🍑💦🍆 #PrideMonth #fypシ #nude #sex #gay #LGBTQ #LGBTQIAHappyPrideMonth 🇯🇲 yardiestyle🇯🇲 🇧🇷BRAZIL DEC /27-JAN 20 BEasT10🦍{TOP 2%} I love y’all ❤️🇳🇬 🇩🇴 MAN-A-CONDAXXL🇩🇴 daversgroom ERIC
0:51

Sensitive content

HAPPY PRIDE MONTH 🥳💝🏳️‍🌈🌈 He wanted to train my hole for the main sex while he watches his favourite show (FOOTBALL ⚽) 🍑💦🍆 #PrideMonth #fypシ #nude #sex #gay #LGBTQ #LGBTQIAHappyPrideMonth 🇯🇲 yardiestyle🇯🇲 🇧🇷BRAZIL DEC /27-JAN 20 BEasT10🦍{TOP 2%} I love y’all ❤️🇳🇬 🇩🇴 MAN-A-CONDAXXL🇩🇴 daversgroom ERIC

BADDEST BLUE 🇳🇬🌈(3k)

12,586 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce

🚨 All Charges DROPPED 🔥 They said I was part of a group that threatened via social media platform 'X' to fire-bomb a police officers home 😲 On the 28th March this year I was arrested, had my devices seized and put on strict bail conditions for 3 months because a police officer was threatened in the comments of a post I put out on X A single mother in my town life was made hell when a gang of illegal immigrants that was staying in a hotel moved in to the house next door to her and began terrorizing her, coming into her home uninvited hiding in her garden looking through her windows and playing loud music until the early hours She logged everything with the police council and local MP who have her a diary to keep a log of all the incidents Then one night in March this year it kicked off really bad the migrants were very aggressive the police were called, again NOTHING was being done Sick of being made a prisoner in her own home she told police she would go to the media (me) the call handler told her if she did that she could be arrested for inciting racial hatred 😲 I put her concerns out and named the alleged officer that said it, he allegedly received threats in the comments on my post on X, and was in fear for his family's lives so I was arrested, but they lied to the charge room sergeant to authorize my arrest. They said and I quote " Alan has made a threat to patrol bomb a police officers home, he's part of a group that have made threats to this officer and now he is in fear for his and his wife's life" Do for the last 3 months I've been a bit quiet because one wrong move would have had me remanded in custody, I was still out there though I had 3 bail conditions Not to create upload or share any social media post in relation to the copper in the case Not to publish or display any information relating to the copper in the case Not to encourage or incite any other person to cause harm to police officers whether they are on or off duty or cause damage to their property The process is the punishment Never ever surrender. EVER!
1:14

🚨 All Charges DROPPED 🔥 They said I was part of a group that threatened via social media platform 'X' to fire-bomb a police officers home 😲 On the 28th March this year I was arrested, had my devices seized and put on strict bail conditions for 3 months because a police officer was threatened in the comments of a post I put out on X A single mother in my town life was made hell when a gang of illegal immigrants that was staying in a hotel moved in to the house next door to her and began terrorizing her, coming into her home uninvited hiding in her garden looking through her windows and playing loud music until the early hours She logged everything with the police council and local MP who have her a diary to keep a log of all the incidents Then one night in March this year it kicked off really bad the migrants were very aggressive the police were called, again NOTHING was being done Sick of being made a prisoner in her own home she told police she would go to the media (me) the call handler told her if she did that she could be arrested for inciting racial hatred 😲 I put her concerns out and named the alleged officer that said it, he allegedly received threats in the comments on my post on X, and was in fear for his family's lives so I was arrested, but they lied to the charge room sergeant to authorize my arrest. They said and I quote " Alan has made a threat to patrol bomb a police officers home, he's part of a group that have made threats to this officer and now he is in fear for his and his wife's life" Do for the last 3 months I've been a bit quiet because one wrong move would have had me remanded in custody, I was still out there though I had 3 bail conditions Not to create upload or share any social media post in relation to the copper in the case Not to publish or display any information relating to the copper in the case Not to encourage or incite any other person to cause harm to police officers whether they are on or off duty or cause damage to their property The process is the punishment Never ever surrender. EVER!

Active Patriot

72,372 görüntüleme • 3 ay önce

When I received a cancer diagnosis in 2015, I dedicated every waking moment to getting healthy. Step 1 - cure. Step 2 - eliminate the cause. Turns out, step 2 was the hardest part. My environment was so toxic, there is no doubt that it contributed to it. One undeniable element of that comes from living in CA most of my life which has some of the most polluted water🚰 Freedom begins with optimal mental, physical and spiritual health, something I work for every day. Living part time on an off-grid homestead has really taught me how to earn that freedom, regardless of where I’m at in the world. We grow our own food devoid of chemicals for nutritional freedom, and now through deposition water harvesting, we have pure & abundant water freedom. 💦 The sad reality is that few people in the US have true water freedom, relying on toxic municipal water, contaminated well water, or inconsistent rainfall. Because of my passion for this topic & technology, I have acquired a piece of this company with distribution rights. I’m offering a significant financial advantage to those who want to experience complete water freedom 💧 ➡️ Comment “water freedom” and I’ll send you a message with more information.
1:02

When I received a cancer diagnosis in 2015, I dedicated every waking moment to getting healthy. Step 1 - cure. Step 2 - eliminate the cause. Turns out, step 2 was the hardest part. My environment was so toxic, there is no doubt that it contributed to it. One undeniable element of that comes from living in CA most of my life which has some of the most polluted water🚰 Freedom begins with optimal mental, physical and spiritual health, something I work for every day. Living part time on an off-grid homestead has really taught me how to earn that freedom, regardless of where I’m at in the world. We grow our own food devoid of chemicals for nutritional freedom, and now through deposition water harvesting, we have pure & abundant water freedom. 💦 The sad reality is that few people in the US have true water freedom, relying on toxic municipal water, contaminated well water, or inconsistent rainfall. Because of my passion for this topic & technology, I have acquired a piece of this company with distribution rights. I’m offering a significant financial advantage to those who want to experience complete water freedom 💧 ➡️ Comment “water freedom” and I’ll send you a message with more information.

Janna Breslin

28,021 görüntüleme • 2 yıl önce

🙏Charlee Baker was born on May 6th, 2017. She weighed 6 lb 8 oz. At 18 days old, she received the Recombivax HB vaccine. 22 hours later, she suffered sudden cardiac arrest while nursing. Her mother (a certified registered nurse) was at Panera with a colleague when it happened. By some miracle, they resuscitated her. But Charlee had suffered a severe anoxic brain injury. At 2 months old, as Charlee was preparing to be discharged from the hospital, doctors wanted to give her more vaccines. Her mother didn't know then what she knows now. Charlee received Hib and Prevnar. Immediately after, she went into bradycardia and apnea. A neonatologist admitted the quiet part out loud: she routinely tells residents to put the crash cart next to NICU isolates when babies receive vaccines. Charlee died suddenly at 4 months and two days old in the middle of the night. Stories like Charlee's are dismissed as "rare, undefined events." For far too many families, they are very well defined... ICAN - Informed Consent Action Network has been fighting for years to make sure these stories are heard - winning cases that seemed impossible, opening doors that were supposed to stay closed. The ICAN Legacy Project - The Terrace at our Texas headquarters - is in its final days. It's a space where names like Charlee's can be remembered and where families can honor those who inspired them to stand up and demand answers. It's also a space where friends who have locked arms with us can make their voices heard. A personalized brick or plaque lets you leave your mark on a movement that refuses to let these stories be erased. Just a few days left to order. Secure your brick or plaque here 👉 In memory of Charlee Baker. 5/6/17 - 9/8/17.
2:22

🙏Charlee Baker was born on May 6th, 2017. She weighed 6 lb 8 oz. At 18 days old, she received the Recombivax HB vaccine. 22 hours later, she suffered sudden cardiac arrest while nursing. Her mother (a certified registered nurse) was at Panera with a colleague when it happened. By some miracle, they resuscitated her. But Charlee had suffered a severe anoxic brain injury. At 2 months old, as Charlee was preparing to be discharged from the hospital, doctors wanted to give her more vaccines. Her mother didn't know then what she knows now. Charlee received Hib and Prevnar. Immediately after, she went into bradycardia and apnea. A neonatologist admitted the quiet part out loud: she routinely tells residents to put the crash cart next to NICU isolates when babies receive vaccines. Charlee died suddenly at 4 months and two days old in the middle of the night. Stories like Charlee's are dismissed as "rare, undefined events." For far too many families, they are very well defined... ICAN - Informed Consent Action Network has been fighting for years to make sure these stories are heard - winning cases that seemed impossible, opening doors that were supposed to stay closed. The ICAN Legacy Project - The Terrace at our Texas headquarters - is in its final days. It's a space where names like Charlee's can be remembered and where families can honor those who inspired them to stand up and demand answers. It's also a space where friends who have locked arms with us can make their voices heard. A personalized brick or plaque lets you leave your mark on a movement that refuses to let these stories be erased. Just a few days left to order. Secure your brick or plaque here 👉 In memory of Charlee Baker. 5/6/17 - 9/8/17.

The HighWire

24,632 görüntüleme • 7 ay önce

BREAKING: Urgent situation as TUSLA / CAMHS “experts” (LGBT activists) block a vulnerable child’s access to education. Martina Burke speaks out. Martina Burke has operated a tuition centre in Castlebar Co. Mayo for over 25 years. In this year’s Leaving Certificate exams 40% of students achieved H1 in Higher Level English, with 63% achieving H3 or above in Maths (HL). In 2021 a mother requested assistance for her son who had no school place. The child thrived academically and behaviourally, excelling in his studies. Professionals advised that the child could not succeed at a mainstream school at the time, and that the education he was receiving from the Burkes was the best for him for the present. TUSLA were carrying out an initial assessment involving the child at the time but excluded Martina Burke from the process. According to TUSLA’s own policy all professionals involved with a parent and child are consulted as part of an initial assessment. The child’s difficulty in securing a school place went to the District Court. TUSLA gave evidence that the child would receive services upon enrolment in mainstream school. These included SNA, OT, speech and language and NEPS. On the basis of this evidence the court directed that the child be enrolled in a mainstream school. None of the promised services were provided. The child has spent the last two years on a school corridor or in an isolation room. Martina Burke wrote to the Principal twice but never received any response. Martina Burke attended a meeting with CAMHS on 14 August. The two doctors present, Dr. Ronan Rice and Dr. Mark Farquhar, led Martina Burke to believe that they knew nothing about the child’s circumstances at school. In reality CAMHS were fully aware of the child’s horrific experiences at mainstream school over the past two years. When TUSLA were asked why they excluded Martina Burke from the initial assessment they said they were “not in a position to comment.” When Martina Burke pressed for answers TUSLA sent the matter to a ‘third party’, an ‘independent complaints officer’ named Mary Hargaden. Far from being independent Ms Hargaden spent 40 years working with HSE/TUSLA. In 2021 her consulting company received a contract from TUSLA for €1.5 million. Martina Burke received over 22 emails and letters from Ms Hargaden but never received an answer as to why she was excluded. In a report issued last month Hargaden stated that TUSLA “appear to have intended” to consult with Martina Burke about the child’s educational progress. They never did however. CAMHS have several inpatient residential units across Ireland. The logo for these units is the LGBT flag which is a promotion of Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual and Transgender ideology. If you wish to foster a child in Ireland TUSLA require that you are willing to affirm LGBT ideology. Christian belief is not tolerated. Following a damning report into CAMHS in 2023 Dr. Maeve Doyle (‘Child and Adolescent Psychiatrist’) said that CAMHS “needed €2 billion.” CAMHS does not need more hundreds of millions. What we need is basic transparency and truth. Martina Burke was led to believe by these so-called professionals that they were unaware of the facts around this tragic situation. This was not true. These organisations are accountable to no one, and parents live in fear of them. If they cannot be transparent and truthful this should not be tolerated and they should be shut down.
13:02

BREAKING: Urgent situation as TUSLA / CAMHS “experts” (LGBT activists) block a vulnerable child’s access to education. Martina Burke speaks out. Martina Burke has operated a tuition centre in Castlebar Co. Mayo for over 25 years. In this year’s Leaving Certificate exams 40% of students achieved H1 in Higher Level English, with 63% achieving H3 or above in Maths (HL). In 2021 a mother requested assistance for her son who had no school place. The child thrived academically and behaviourally, excelling in his studies. Professionals advised that the child could not succeed at a mainstream school at the time, and that the education he was receiving from the Burkes was the best for him for the present. TUSLA were carrying out an initial assessment involving the child at the time but excluded Martina Burke from the process. According to TUSLA’s own policy all professionals involved with a parent and child are consulted as part of an initial assessment. The child’s difficulty in securing a school place went to the District Court. TUSLA gave evidence that the child would receive services upon enrolment in mainstream school. These included SNA, OT, speech and language and NEPS. On the basis of this evidence the court directed that the child be enrolled in a mainstream school. None of the promised services were provided. The child has spent the last two years on a school corridor or in an isolation room. Martina Burke wrote to the Principal twice but never received any response. Martina Burke attended a meeting with CAMHS on 14 August. The two doctors present, Dr. Ronan Rice and Dr. Mark Farquhar, led Martina Burke to believe that they knew nothing about the child’s circumstances at school. In reality CAMHS were fully aware of the child’s horrific experiences at mainstream school over the past two years. When TUSLA were asked why they excluded Martina Burke from the initial assessment they said they were “not in a position to comment.” When Martina Burke pressed for answers TUSLA sent the matter to a ‘third party’, an ‘independent complaints officer’ named Mary Hargaden. Far from being independent Ms Hargaden spent 40 years working with HSE/TUSLA. In 2021 her consulting company received a contract from TUSLA for €1.5 million. Martina Burke received over 22 emails and letters from Ms Hargaden but never received an answer as to why she was excluded. In a report issued last month Hargaden stated that TUSLA “appear to have intended” to consult with Martina Burke about the child’s educational progress. They never did however. CAMHS have several inpatient residential units across Ireland. The logo for these units is the LGBT flag which is a promotion of Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual and Transgender ideology. If you wish to foster a child in Ireland TUSLA require that you are willing to affirm LGBT ideology. Christian belief is not tolerated. Following a damning report into CAMHS in 2023 Dr. Maeve Doyle (‘Child and Adolescent Psychiatrist’) said that CAMHS “needed €2 billion.” CAMHS does not need more hundreds of millions. What we need is basic transparency and truth. Martina Burke was led to believe by these so-called professionals that they were unaware of the facts around this tragic situation. This was not true. These organisations are accountable to no one, and parents live in fear of them. If they cannot be transparent and truthful this should not be tolerated and they should be shut down.

Enoch Burke

221,590 görüntüleme • 2 yıl önce

Have you watched Lindsay Clancy’s arraignment from February 7, 2023? This was 14 days after the crime. Lindsay appeared via Zoom flat on her back from the hospital. It’s in 2 parts so I could upload it. PART 1: Pay attention at 12:11 to the ADA telling the court that Lindsay told her husband in December 20, 2022, that she had suicidal thoughts and that she also had thoughts of harming the kids. Pay attention at 12:47 where the DA talks about Lindsay’s detailed logs about the medications she took, her difficulties with medications, how she told her doctor who had her stop the medication, or wean off it, and start another medication. She goes on to say that her husband said Lindsay ALWAYS took the medications as prescribed. Pay attention at 16:25 where the ADA describes that ligature strangulation occurs within 10 seconds up to 1 minute. PART 2: Pay attention to defense attorney Reddington at 10:00 discussing a letter from Lindsay’s surgeon submitted to the court about her injuries. Several severe spinal fractures, including spinal transection, rib fractures in the chest, both sides cervical spine fractures. The ADA was arguing that she could move her legs and could be placed in prison. Then pay attention at 13:00. Reddington describes coming across a drawer in the house with a wish vase. His wife had to tell him what it was. Lindsay wrote notes of things she wished for. She hoped to get pregnant again. She wished for success for each of her children. Pay attention at 15:00 when the ADA claims they received information that Lindsay could move her legs. She then argues that Lindsay is a flight risk, even though paralyzed. Pay attention at 16:00 where Reddington describes the hospital the ADA wants to send Lindsay to (Shattuck) as like something in Iran.
17:48

Have you watched Lindsay Clancy’s arraignment from February 7, 2023? This was 14 days after the crime. Lindsay appeared via Zoom flat on her back from the hospital. It’s in 2 parts so I could upload it. PART 1: Pay attention at 12:11 to the ADA telling the court that Lindsay told her husband in December 20, 2022, that she had suicidal thoughts and that she also had thoughts of harming the kids. Pay attention at 12:47 where the DA talks about Lindsay’s detailed logs about the medications she took, her difficulties with medications, how she told her doctor who had her stop the medication, or wean off it, and start another medication. She goes on to say that her husband said Lindsay ALWAYS took the medications as prescribed. Pay attention at 16:25 where the ADA describes that ligature strangulation occurs within 10 seconds up to 1 minute. PART 2: Pay attention to defense attorney Reddington at 10:00 discussing a letter from Lindsay’s surgeon submitted to the court about her injuries. Several severe spinal fractures, including spinal transection, rib fractures in the chest, both sides cervical spine fractures. The ADA was arguing that she could move her legs and could be placed in prison. Then pay attention at 13:00. Reddington describes coming across a drawer in the house with a wish vase. His wife had to tell him what it was. Lindsay wrote notes of things she wished for. She hoped to get pregnant again. She wished for success for each of her children. Pay attention at 15:00 when the ADA claims they received information that Lindsay could move her legs. She then argues that Lindsay is a flight risk, even though paralyzed. Pay attention at 16:00 where Reddington describes the hospital the ADA wants to send Lindsay to (Shattuck) as like something in Iran.

Samsara 🎤🎵🎹

60,835 görüntüleme • 28 gün önce

🚨#BREAKING: Outrage is erupting after a Missouri police officer who STARVED his own K9 partner to de*th and abused a another K-9... ...received just 15 DAYS in jail for doing so The dog, Apollo, lost nearly 40% of his body weight, his ribs and spine were poking through his skin, and he passed away from "terminal starvation and dehydration" in a kennel in the officer's backyard. His punishment? FIFTEEN DAYS in jail. His name is Derrick Durall. He was the K9 handler for the Dexter Police Department in Missouri. His partner was Apollo, a Belgian Malinois the department bought in April 2023. In September 2023, a veterinarian examined Apollo. Her words, in the court record: a "perfectly healthy police dog." 67 pounds. Body condition: "perfect." Five months later, on February 18, 2024, Apollo was found de*d in his kennel outside Durall's house. He weighed 41 pounds. Twenty-five pounds, GONE. His muscles wasted away. His eyes sunken into his skull. The state trooper's photos show his ribs and vertebrae protruding through his skin. The necropsy: "terminal starvation and dehydration." The police department PROVIDED the dog food, for free. It was sitting right there. He just... didn't feed him. When investigators asked, Durall claimed he "had not noticed the health decline" of his own partner. A dog that lost nearly 40% of its body weight, in his own backyard. It gets worse. There was a SECOND dog. Retired K9 Knox lived in the kennel next to Apollo. When they found him, he had severe heartworms, teeth worn down, and he had lost 10 pounds and had not seen a vet in over a YEAR. Investigators said he smelled so bad the stench wouldn't come off after washing him FIVE times. Now here's where I need you to pay attention, because this is the accountability part. Prosecutors charged him with TWO FELONIES for animal abuse, alleging the suffering was "torture, consciously inflicted." A jury trial was set for this summer. And then, last week, it all evaporated. He was allowed to plead guilty to two MISDEMEANORS. T he felonies vanished and a judge sentenced him to one year in jail... and then SUSPENDED it. Fifteen days. Two years probation. $8,900 to the city. That's it. It gets worse. Missouri has a law called Max's Law. If YOU, a regular citizen, knowingly m*rder a police K9, it's a Class D felony with up to SEVEN YEARS in prison. Attack a police dog and you could do seven years. Starve one to de*th in your backyard while wearing the badge... fifteen days. Apollo couldn't open the food bag. He couldn't turn on a faucet. He couldn't call a vet. He was completely dependent on the one man sworn to take care of him. And that man let him waste away to 41 pounds and starve in the cold. Pure evil.
0:32

🚨#BREAKING: Outrage is erupting after a Missouri police officer who STARVED his own K9 partner to de*th and abused a another K-9... ...received just 15 DAYS in jail for doing so The dog, Apollo, lost nearly 40% of his body weight, his ribs and spine were poking through his skin, and he passed away from "terminal starvation and dehydration" in a kennel in the officer's backyard. His punishment? FIFTEEN DAYS in jail. His name is Derrick Durall. He was the K9 handler for the Dexter Police Department in Missouri. His partner was Apollo, a Belgian Malinois the department bought in April 2023. In September 2023, a veterinarian examined Apollo. Her words, in the court record: a "perfectly healthy police dog." 67 pounds. Body condition: "perfect." Five months later, on February 18, 2024, Apollo was found de*d in his kennel outside Durall's house. He weighed 41 pounds. Twenty-five pounds, GONE. His muscles wasted away. His eyes sunken into his skull. The state trooper's photos show his ribs and vertebrae protruding through his skin. The necropsy: "terminal starvation and dehydration." The police department PROVIDED the dog food, for free. It was sitting right there. He just... didn't feed him. When investigators asked, Durall claimed he "had not noticed the health decline" of his own partner. A dog that lost nearly 40% of its body weight, in his own backyard. It gets worse. There was a SECOND dog. Retired K9 Knox lived in the kennel next to Apollo. When they found him, he had severe heartworms, teeth worn down, and he had lost 10 pounds and had not seen a vet in over a YEAR. Investigators said he smelled so bad the stench wouldn't come off after washing him FIVE times. Now here's where I need you to pay attention, because this is the accountability part. Prosecutors charged him with TWO FELONIES for animal abuse, alleging the suffering was "torture, consciously inflicted." A jury trial was set for this summer. And then, last week, it all evaporated. He was allowed to plead guilty to two MISDEMEANORS. T he felonies vanished and a judge sentenced him to one year in jail... and then SUSPENDED it. Fifteen days. Two years probation. $8,900 to the city. That's it. It gets worse. Missouri has a law called Max's Law. If YOU, a regular citizen, knowingly m*rder a police K9, it's a Class D felony with up to SEVEN YEARS in prison. Attack a police dog and you could do seven years. Starve one to de*th in your backyard while wearing the badge... fifteen days. Apollo couldn't open the food bag. He couldn't turn on a faucet. He couldn't call a vet. He was completely dependent on the one man sworn to take care of him. And that man let him waste away to 41 pounds and starve in the cold. Pure evil.

Matt Van Swol

606,409 görüntüleme • 11 gün önce

🇺🇸 MOSSAD, MI6, THE CIA, AND PUTIN: AN EX-CIA OFFICER MAPS EVERY INTELLIGENCE LINK IN THE EPSTEIN FILES John Kiriakou spent 14 years at the CIA and went to federal prison for exposing the agency's torture program. He knows what intelligence operations look like from the inside, and he says the Epstein files are exactly that. Epstein was actively seeking access to the CIA, FBI, NSC, MI5, MI6, and even requested a private meeting with Putin. He had SCIF access in 2018. John says an uncleared civilian shouldn't even know where a SCIF is, let alone be invited inside one. Victims received death threats in Hebrew. John says that tracks with how Mossad operates. On the death, the ear doesn't match, the autopsy doesn't add up, and the body was cremated so it can never be re-examined. John also confirmed that during his time at the CIA, he was part of a conversation where officials discussed encouraging a problem asset to kill himself. We've seen 2% of what the FBI has. And someone decided that's enough. The question is who made that call, and what's in the other 98%. Full interview with John Kiriakou below 02:10 - Who’s behind the cover-up? Kiriakou weighs Mossad vs. CIA vs. the billionaire class. 04:36 - New conclusion: Epstein was actively seeking ties to CIA, FBI, MI5, MI6, and even Putin. 07:09 - Epstein enters a SCIF in 2018 despite being an uncleared convicted sex offender. 09:45 - Plotting to access billions in frozen Libyan assets with alleged MI6 and Mossad ties. 16:30 - Victims receive death threats in Hebrew: is this Mossad tradecraft? 21:30 - The prison irregularities: deleted footage, broken protocols, and missing cellmate. 24:00 - The ear, the autopsy, the “decoy body,” and unanswered forensic questions. 29:19 - Only 2% of the files released: parallels to the redacted torture report. 39:50 - Honeypot or blackmail operation? Cameras in bathrooms and coded language. 43:11 - Kiriakou recalls CIA officials discussing encouraging a liability to commit suicide.
57:09

🇺🇸 MOSSAD, MI6, THE CIA, AND PUTIN: AN EX-CIA OFFICER MAPS EVERY INTELLIGENCE LINK IN THE EPSTEIN FILES John Kiriakou spent 14 years at the CIA and went to federal prison for exposing the agency's torture program. He knows what intelligence operations look like from the inside, and he says the Epstein files are exactly that. Epstein was actively seeking access to the CIA, FBI, NSC, MI5, MI6, and even requested a private meeting with Putin. He had SCIF access in 2018. John says an uncleared civilian shouldn't even know where a SCIF is, let alone be invited inside one. Victims received death threats in Hebrew. John says that tracks with how Mossad operates. On the death, the ear doesn't match, the autopsy doesn't add up, and the body was cremated so it can never be re-examined. John also confirmed that during his time at the CIA, he was part of a conversation where officials discussed encouraging a problem asset to kill himself. We've seen 2% of what the FBI has. And someone decided that's enough. The question is who made that call, and what's in the other 98%. Full interview with John Kiriakou below 02:10 - Who’s behind the cover-up? Kiriakou weighs Mossad vs. CIA vs. the billionaire class. 04:36 - New conclusion: Epstein was actively seeking ties to CIA, FBI, MI5, MI6, and even Putin. 07:09 - Epstein enters a SCIF in 2018 despite being an uncleared convicted sex offender. 09:45 - Plotting to access billions in frozen Libyan assets with alleged MI6 and Mossad ties. 16:30 - Victims receive death threats in Hebrew: is this Mossad tradecraft? 21:30 - The prison irregularities: deleted footage, broken protocols, and missing cellmate. 24:00 - The ear, the autopsy, the “decoy body,” and unanswered forensic questions. 29:19 - Only 2% of the files released: parallels to the redacted torture report. 39:50 - Honeypot or blackmail operation? Cameras in bathrooms and coded language. 43:11 - Kiriakou recalls CIA officials discussing encouraging a liability to commit suicide.

Mario Nawfal

1,079,820 görüntüleme • 6 ay önce

A 23 year old Salman Vohra, who had gone to watch a cricket tournament match in #Chikhodra, #Gujarat on 22 June, was mercilessly beaten to death by a group of men. Salman was newly married, having wed two months ago, and his wife is a month pregnant. He was a resident of Polson compound in Gujarat’s #Anand and worked in the garment business. According to The Quint, the mob had been heckling #Muslim players with #Hindutva slogans like “Jai Shri Ram” as the Muslim players performed well in the tournament. Locals told the news website that tensions had begun even before the match because Muslim players were excelling in the tournament, which did not sit well with some locals associated with right-wing groups. Many of the players who excelled in the quarterfinals and semifinals were #Muslims, claimed activist Aasim Khedawala. Apparently, even in the final, one team was mostly comprised of Muslims, and the other team had 2-3 Muslim players. When Muslims were playing, a section of the crowd began shouting ‘#JaiShriRam,’ Khedawala said to The Quint. The specific incident started with a parking dispute. A group of men allegedly arrived on motorcycles and got into a fight with Salman, telling him to move his bike from the stand. The assailants kept saying, “Vohra (Salman), do what we’re telling you to do.” They started mercilessly beating Salman. Members of the crowd even cheered the attackers. A viral video shows some men in the crowd shouting, “maaro! maaro!” (Hit him! Hit him!). The ambulance took him to a nearby hospital, but on reaching there, they were told to go to a bigger private hospital. However, upon arrival at the second hospital and speaking to the doctor, Salman breathed his last. Two other Muslim men were injured; one received around 17 stitches, and the other around 7 stitches, The Quint reported. According to Noman Vohra, Salman’s uncle, Salman had marks on his right hand, cuts below his eyes, and his ear was brutally damaged—almost bitten off by the attackers. A knife wound damaged his kidney, which was the most severe injury. He was also beaten on his lower waist and neck, causing significant bleeding. The family filed an FIR on 23 June at the Anand Rural police station. It includes sections of the Indian Penal Code (IPC) such as: 143 (Punishment for unlawful assembly), 147 (Punishment for rioting), 148 (Being armed with a deadly weapon), 302 (Murder), and 324 (Voluntarily causing hurt by dangerous weapon) among others, including The Gujarat Police Act. Seven accused have been arrested in the matter, and the court has given seven days remand for all these accused. The accused were identified as Mehul alias Gheto Dineshbhai Parmar, Kiran alias Holo Mafatbhai Parmar, and Mahendra alias Fulio Rameshbhai Vaghela. Others arrested include Akshay alias Ako Narsinghbhai Parmar, Ratilal Raisingbhai Parmar, Vijay alias Pakorani Mangalbhai Parmar (all from Chikhodara), and Ketan Mahendrabhai Patel from Vaghasi.
1:16

A 23 year old Salman Vohra, who had gone to watch a cricket tournament match in #Chikhodra, #Gujarat on 22 June, was mercilessly beaten to death by a group of men. Salman was newly married, having wed two months ago, and his wife is a month pregnant. He was a resident of Polson compound in Gujarat’s #Anand and worked in the garment business. According to The Quint, the mob had been heckling #Muslim players with #Hindutva slogans like “Jai Shri Ram” as the Muslim players performed well in the tournament. Locals told the news website that tensions had begun even before the match because Muslim players were excelling in the tournament, which did not sit well with some locals associated with right-wing groups. Many of the players who excelled in the quarterfinals and semifinals were #Muslims, claimed activist Aasim Khedawala. Apparently, even in the final, one team was mostly comprised of Muslims, and the other team had 2-3 Muslim players. When Muslims were playing, a section of the crowd began shouting ‘#JaiShriRam,’ Khedawala said to The Quint. The specific incident started with a parking dispute. A group of men allegedly arrived on motorcycles and got into a fight with Salman, telling him to move his bike from the stand. The assailants kept saying, “Vohra (Salman), do what we’re telling you to do.” They started mercilessly beating Salman. Members of the crowd even cheered the attackers. A viral video shows some men in the crowd shouting, “maaro! maaro!” (Hit him! Hit him!). The ambulance took him to a nearby hospital, but on reaching there, they were told to go to a bigger private hospital. However, upon arrival at the second hospital and speaking to the doctor, Salman breathed his last. Two other Muslim men were injured; one received around 17 stitches, and the other around 7 stitches, The Quint reported. According to Noman Vohra, Salman’s uncle, Salman had marks on his right hand, cuts below his eyes, and his ear was brutally damaged—almost bitten off by the attackers. A knife wound damaged his kidney, which was the most severe injury. He was also beaten on his lower waist and neck, causing significant bleeding. The family filed an FIR on 23 June at the Anand Rural police station. It includes sections of the Indian Penal Code (IPC) such as: 143 (Punishment for unlawful assembly), 147 (Punishment for rioting), 148 (Being armed with a deadly weapon), 302 (Murder), and 324 (Voluntarily causing hurt by dangerous weapon) among others, including The Gujarat Police Act. Seven accused have been arrested in the matter, and the court has given seven days remand for all these accused. The accused were identified as Mehul alias Gheto Dineshbhai Parmar, Kiran alias Holo Mafatbhai Parmar, and Mahendra alias Fulio Rameshbhai Vaghela. Others arrested include Akshay alias Ako Narsinghbhai Parmar, Ratilal Raisingbhai Parmar, Vijay alias Pakorani Mangalbhai Parmar (all from Chikhodara), and Ketan Mahendrabhai Patel from Vaghasi.

Hate Detector 🔍

178,977 görüntüleme • 2 yıl önce

On 20 March 2025, Kashmiri youth Naeem Muzaffar was forcibly disappeared from his home in Sector G-10/2, Islamabad. The abduction has been recorded on CCTV footage, which shows use of a police vehicle as well and abductors in black elite force uniform. Despite almost two months having passed since Naeem was forcibly disappeared, Police Station Ramna refused to lodge the FIR for abduction. Yesterday, the police brazenly lied before the High Court stating that the family had never approached the police station for registration of FIR when in reality an officer named Niaz at PS Ramna had told the family it was better to remain silent (each time they approached the PS and handed in applications for the FIR). Despite the IHC directing police to lodge the FIR yesterday, when the family went once again to Ramna Police Station, they were being forced to remove the word “black uniforms” from their application and insert “black tracksuits” instead despite clear CCTV footage. Naeem’s family refused to change the application and despite officials at PS Ramna assuring that FIR would be lodged and shared, the same is yet to be seen. The police have already wasted time that is crucial in any such investigation - the initial tracing and evidence collection. But that is by design in all cases of enforced disappearances - families are meant to run from pillar to post without any relief in sight and the general public is meant to see that frustration and despair. It is meant to scare everyone into silence and compliance. Yesterday, Naeem’s mother was telling me how her husband (an otherwise lively and generally happy man) has been a victim of severe depression since his son’s enforced disappearances - he has been afflicted with various illnesses ever since. A State that does this to families as a form of collective punishment is not a “hard State” - it is a cruel and intolerable State that has to be dismantled from top to bottom. Today, it is Naeem. Tomorrow, it will be you & I - and by the time it comes to those who thought silence was a better option, there really wont be anyone left to speak. #ReleaseNaeemMuzaffar #EndEnforcedDisappearances
2:14

On 20 March 2025, Kashmiri youth Naeem Muzaffar was forcibly disappeared from his home in Sector G-10/2, Islamabad. The abduction has been recorded on CCTV footage, which shows use of a police vehicle as well and abductors in black elite force uniform. Despite almost two months having passed since Naeem was forcibly disappeared, Police Station Ramna refused to lodge the FIR for abduction. Yesterday, the police brazenly lied before the High Court stating that the family had never approached the police station for registration of FIR when in reality an officer named Niaz at PS Ramna had told the family it was better to remain silent (each time they approached the PS and handed in applications for the FIR). Despite the IHC directing police to lodge the FIR yesterday, when the family went once again to Ramna Police Station, they were being forced to remove the word “black uniforms” from their application and insert “black tracksuits” instead despite clear CCTV footage. Naeem’s family refused to change the application and despite officials at PS Ramna assuring that FIR would be lodged and shared, the same is yet to be seen. The police have already wasted time that is crucial in any such investigation - the initial tracing and evidence collection. But that is by design in all cases of enforced disappearances - families are meant to run from pillar to post without any relief in sight and the general public is meant to see that frustration and despair. It is meant to scare everyone into silence and compliance. Yesterday, Naeem’s mother was telling me how her husband (an otherwise lively and generally happy man) has been a victim of severe depression since his son’s enforced disappearances - he has been afflicted with various illnesses ever since. A State that does this to families as a form of collective punishment is not a “hard State” - it is a cruel and intolerable State that has to be dismantled from top to bottom. Today, it is Naeem. Tomorrow, it will be you & I - and by the time it comes to those who thought silence was a better option, there really wont be anyone left to speak. #ReleaseNaeemMuzaffar #EndEnforcedDisappearances

Imaan Zainab Mazari-Hazir

192,248 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce

"What kind of punishment lasts for two hours inside a room," asks the father of a 16-year-old girl, who jumped from the third floor of a school building in Haryana's Faridabad and died. The incident took place on Tuesday at the Navodaya Vidya Niketan Senior Secondary School. The girl's father, Pramod Kumar, has claimed that his daughter was punished for eating biryani and ordered to stand outside the classroom under the sun. The girl, Janvi, then went to the vice principal's room and returned after nearly two hours, according to CCTV footage accessed by Kumar. She then went straight to the third floor and jumped to her death. "My daughter's friend told us that they had eaten biryani at school, after which she was punished and told to stand outside the classroom. The school's CCTV footage shows that she went into the vice-principal's room at around 11 am and came out two hours later. No one knows what happened inside that room," said Kumar. "The CCTV shows Janvi coming out once or twice before going back into the vice-principal's room. She came out again at around 1:30 pm and then went straight to the third floor." When asked if Janvi had ever received punishment such as standing under the sun before, Kumar said "no". He further accused the school of "hiding its shortcomings" and informing the family late about the unfortunate incident. "Whenever anything happened at school, if she was unwell or there was any other issue, the school would call me immediately. But yesterday, they did not call me even once," Kumar said. Kumar alleged that the family was informed about their daughter jumping from the school building "at the last moment" and that the school administration left the hospital "without meeting" the parents. According to the school principal RK Sharma, Janvi went to the washroom on the third floor. Calling it an "outright lie", Kumar again questioned what happened inside the vice principal's room. "That is completely false... We checked the footage. She was inside for two hours. What kind of punishment was she given? We don't know what they did to her inside... They told us this (the alleged suicide attempt) only around 2:30 pm, after the school had closed, even though the incident had happened much earlier." The injured student was taken to a private hospital, from where she was referred to BK Hospital, where doctors declared her dead. The post-mortem examination is underway, and further action will be taken based on the report. According to the Station House Officer Sumir Singh, no complaint has been filed seeking for registering an FIR. However, an investigation into the matter is underway. "We have not found anything suspicious in the footage or any suspicious activity at the school," Singh told to media. "So far, there is nothing before us to suggest that she was punished for four hours." Speaking to media, a fellow parent, whose four children studied at the same school, claimed that the school is infamous for giving harsh punishments to children. "My children were asked to stand in the sun, thrashed and humiliated publicly for a delay in fee payment," she said. Janvi's father, Kumar, has called for a thorough investigation and demanded a post-mortem at AIIMS hospital.
0:56

"What kind of punishment lasts for two hours inside a room," asks the father of a 16-year-old girl, who jumped from the third floor of a school building in Haryana's Faridabad and died. The incident took place on Tuesday at the Navodaya Vidya Niketan Senior Secondary School. The girl's father, Pramod Kumar, has claimed that his daughter was punished for eating biryani and ordered to stand outside the classroom under the sun. The girl, Janvi, then went to the vice principal's room and returned after nearly two hours, according to CCTV footage accessed by Kumar. She then went straight to the third floor and jumped to her death. "My daughter's friend told us that they had eaten biryani at school, after which she was punished and told to stand outside the classroom. The school's CCTV footage shows that she went into the vice-principal's room at around 11 am and came out two hours later. No one knows what happened inside that room," said Kumar. "The CCTV shows Janvi coming out once or twice before going back into the vice-principal's room. She came out again at around 1:30 pm and then went straight to the third floor." When asked if Janvi had ever received punishment such as standing under the sun before, Kumar said "no". He further accused the school of "hiding its shortcomings" and informing the family late about the unfortunate incident. "Whenever anything happened at school, if she was unwell or there was any other issue, the school would call me immediately. But yesterday, they did not call me even once," Kumar said. Kumar alleged that the family was informed about their daughter jumping from the school building "at the last moment" and that the school administration left the hospital "without meeting" the parents. According to the school principal RK Sharma, Janvi went to the washroom on the third floor. Calling it an "outright lie", Kumar again questioned what happened inside the vice principal's room. "That is completely false... We checked the footage. She was inside for two hours. What kind of punishment was she given? We don't know what they did to her inside... They told us this (the alleged suicide attempt) only around 2:30 pm, after the school had closed, even though the incident had happened much earlier." The injured student was taken to a private hospital, from where she was referred to BK Hospital, where doctors declared her dead. The post-mortem examination is underway, and further action will be taken based on the report. According to the Station House Officer Sumir Singh, no complaint has been filed seeking for registering an FIR. However, an investigation into the matter is underway. "We have not found anything suspicious in the footage or any suspicious activity at the school," Singh told to media. "So far, there is nothing before us to suggest that she was punished for four hours." Speaking to media, a fellow parent, whose four children studied at the same school, claimed that the school is infamous for giving harsh punishments to children. "My children were asked to stand in the sun, thrashed and humiliated publicly for a delay in fee payment," she said. Janvi's father, Kumar, has called for a thorough investigation and demanded a post-mortem at AIIMS hospital.

Hate Detector 🔍

55,692 görüntüleme • 11 gün önce

🚨BOMBSHELL: Charlie Kirk Was “SLATED FOR TERMINATION” in December 2024 – His Friend Was Deliberately STOPPED from SAVING HIM! 😱 A longtime friend and security expert who knew Charlie Kirk since his teenage years has come forward with chilling details about the conservative leader's final months. This individual, a founding member of the Oath Keepers with extensive experience protecting political figures, received desperate messages from Kirk in December 2024—messages that conveyed unmistakable fear for his life and an urgent plea to overhaul his security detail. According to the testimony, Kirk's communications were not casual inquiries but insistent appeals, laced with an intensity that suggested he perceived a specific, imminent threat. "He was aware that he was in danger," the friend recounts, emphasizing that Kirk, who had never previously enlisted his services for events, reached out repeatedly despite the friend's own battle with severe Legionnaires' pneumonia at the time. Plans for an in-person meeting in Phoenix on January 25, 2025, were repeatedly thwarted by a cascade of suspicious events: a debilitating illness that delayed the rendezvous, followed by a heated confrontation with a new neighbor just three days prior. This neighbor, identifying himself as a former police officer and college professor, allegedly escalated the discussion into outright threats. Defending Kirk during a political debate, the friend was stunned when the man declared, "Charlie Kirk had been slated for termination." The conversation turned personal moments later, with the neighbor claiming the friend himself had been "signed for reprogramming." What began as words erupted into a physical altercation, resulting in the friend's arrest on misdemeanor domestic violence charges—locking him in jail precisely on the scheduled meeting date with Charlie. This sequence, the friend asserts, was no coincidence. He views it as a deliberate military-style operation designed to intercept the meeting and silence a potential warning. After Kirk's assassination on September 10, 2025, at Utah Valley University the friend attempted to alert the FBI in Phoenix and Utah after the shooting, but was met with complete silence, mirroring reports from eyewitnesses at the event who say their statements were never solicited by police or the FBI either. Two profound questions emerge from this account: 1.) What did Charlie Kirk know in December 2024? His urgency implies foreknowledge of a credible plot—perhaps betrayal within his inner circle or intelligence about a coordinated threat. Why reach out to a retired security veteran he trusted from over a decade ago, even offering payment for help? Did He suspect his own security was compromised. 2.) Was the assassination premeditated far earlier than believed? The neighbor's casual reference to "termination" in January, combined with the orchestrated barriers to intervention, points to a conspiracy already in motion. Regardless who actually pulled the trigger, we need to know who set the plan in place—and why was a warning systematically blocked? This testimony, captured in a raw phone interview (starting at the 5:45 timestamp), exposes potential cracks in the official narrative and raises alarms about unchecked political violence. As investigations continue amid bipartisan calls for enhanced protections, we must demand transparency. Kirk's death was not merely a tragedy; it may have been foretold—and preventable. What are your thoughts? RT & Share below, and let's honor Charlie's legacy by seeking the full truth.
18:53

🚨BOMBSHELL: Charlie Kirk Was “SLATED FOR TERMINATION” in December 2024 – His Friend Was Deliberately STOPPED from SAVING HIM! 😱 A longtime friend and security expert who knew Charlie Kirk since his teenage years has come forward with chilling details about the conservative leader's final months. This individual, a founding member of the Oath Keepers with extensive experience protecting political figures, received desperate messages from Kirk in December 2024—messages that conveyed unmistakable fear for his life and an urgent plea to overhaul his security detail. According to the testimony, Kirk's communications were not casual inquiries but insistent appeals, laced with an intensity that suggested he perceived a specific, imminent threat. "He was aware that he was in danger," the friend recounts, emphasizing that Kirk, who had never previously enlisted his services for events, reached out repeatedly despite the friend's own battle with severe Legionnaires' pneumonia at the time. Plans for an in-person meeting in Phoenix on January 25, 2025, were repeatedly thwarted by a cascade of suspicious events: a debilitating illness that delayed the rendezvous, followed by a heated confrontation with a new neighbor just three days prior. This neighbor, identifying himself as a former police officer and college professor, allegedly escalated the discussion into outright threats. Defending Kirk during a political debate, the friend was stunned when the man declared, "Charlie Kirk had been slated for termination." The conversation turned personal moments later, with the neighbor claiming the friend himself had been "signed for reprogramming." What began as words erupted into a physical altercation, resulting in the friend's arrest on misdemeanor domestic violence charges—locking him in jail precisely on the scheduled meeting date with Charlie. This sequence, the friend asserts, was no coincidence. He views it as a deliberate military-style operation designed to intercept the meeting and silence a potential warning. After Kirk's assassination on September 10, 2025, at Utah Valley University the friend attempted to alert the FBI in Phoenix and Utah after the shooting, but was met with complete silence, mirroring reports from eyewitnesses at the event who say their statements were never solicited by police or the FBI either. Two profound questions emerge from this account: 1.) What did Charlie Kirk know in December 2024? His urgency implies foreknowledge of a credible plot—perhaps betrayal within his inner circle or intelligence about a coordinated threat. Why reach out to a retired security veteran he trusted from over a decade ago, even offering payment for help? Did He suspect his own security was compromised. 2.) Was the assassination premeditated far earlier than believed? The neighbor's casual reference to "termination" in January, combined with the orchestrated barriers to intervention, points to a conspiracy already in motion. Regardless who actually pulled the trigger, we need to know who set the plan in place—and why was a warning systematically blocked? This testimony, captured in a raw phone interview (starting at the 5:45 timestamp), exposes potential cracks in the official narrative and raises alarms about unchecked political violence. As investigations continue amid bipartisan calls for enhanced protections, we must demand transparency. Kirk's death was not merely a tragedy; it may have been foretold—and preventable. What are your thoughts? RT & Share below, and let's honor Charlie's legacy by seeking the full truth.

Project Constitution

574,036 görüntüleme • 9 ay önce

Last year we The Maggie Oliver Foundation were supporting several survivors who had been unlawfully strip searched, unlawfully arrested and treated inhumanely by Greater Manchester Police . We had repeatedly highlighted these cases through the complaints system with Greater Manchester Police and Mayor of Greater Manchester Andy Burnham, but our calls for action fell on deaf ears. We therefore spoke to Sky News who did a great expose of what was going on. Once the media were involved Mayor of Greater Manchester I believe felt he had no choice but to announce another independent review, this time led by Vera Baird DBE KC with whom we worked. We supported 5 victims through the whole process and their evidence was critical in the final report, which heard from 15 victims in the end. Her report said the treatment of these women (and 2 men) was BARBARIC, and she actually made 40 recommendations. Many of the victims made serious complaints to Greater Manchester Police Last week a report was published described in the video below. To the best of my knowledge only ONE of the 15 victims of Baird have had any outcome to their complaint, 18 months after submission! And that response was a whitewash, woefully inadequate for the treatment she received. Not ONE officer has ever been disciplined, sacked or held accountable for their BARBARIC treatment. 14 victims still no closure! So forgive me for being angry and disillusioned that here we have a tick box PR Exercise before the victims themselves have even had any closure. Furthermore their voices form no part in this “report”, a back slapping exercise in my opinion. In fact many improvements mentioned here should be a given anyway- sanitary products for females in custody, female officers, female and child cells etc etc I welcome no more “welfare strip searches” but my take is that these should be extremely rare anyway and in the cases we were involved in they were simply used as a tool in the abuse of power. On a more positive note though I do feel Greater Manchester Police are much more willing to engage/work with us under the new Chief than his predecessor Ian Hopkins or Peter Fahy but I’m disappointed that we have this “report” published before the victims have even had any meaningful closure. To me it feels like putting the “cart before the horse” and the wrong way round altogether, and that is a big step backwards imo.
9:26

Last year we The Maggie Oliver Foundation were supporting several survivors who had been unlawfully strip searched, unlawfully arrested and treated inhumanely by Greater Manchester Police . We had repeatedly highlighted these cases through the complaints system with Greater Manchester Police and Mayor of Greater Manchester Andy Burnham, but our calls for action fell on deaf ears. We therefore spoke to Sky News who did a great expose of what was going on. Once the media were involved Mayor of Greater Manchester I believe felt he had no choice but to announce another independent review, this time led by Vera Baird DBE KC with whom we worked. We supported 5 victims through the whole process and their evidence was critical in the final report, which heard from 15 victims in the end. Her report said the treatment of these women (and 2 men) was BARBARIC, and she actually made 40 recommendations. Many of the victims made serious complaints to Greater Manchester Police Last week a report was published described in the video below. To the best of my knowledge only ONE of the 15 victims of Baird have had any outcome to their complaint, 18 months after submission! And that response was a whitewash, woefully inadequate for the treatment she received. Not ONE officer has ever been disciplined, sacked or held accountable for their BARBARIC treatment. 14 victims still no closure! So forgive me for being angry and disillusioned that here we have a tick box PR Exercise before the victims themselves have even had any closure. Furthermore their voices form no part in this “report”, a back slapping exercise in my opinion. In fact many improvements mentioned here should be a given anyway- sanitary products for females in custody, female officers, female and child cells etc etc I welcome no more “welfare strip searches” but my take is that these should be extremely rare anyway and in the cases we were involved in they were simply used as a tool in the abuse of power. On a more positive note though I do feel Greater Manchester Police are much more willing to engage/work with us under the new Chief than his predecessor Ian Hopkins or Peter Fahy but I’m disappointed that we have this “report” published before the victims have even had any meaningful closure. To me it feels like putting the “cart before the horse” and the wrong way round altogether, and that is a big step backwards imo.

Maggie Oliver

18,607 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce

I am the Executive Vice President of the Trump Organization. I am visiting China this week in a personal capacity as a supportive son. Normal people visit their mothers in a personal capacity. Normal people attend funerals in a personal capacity. I do it beside sixteen CEOs, five billionaires worth $870 billion, and a 500-aircraft Boeing order being finalized with Beijing during the trip. Goldman Sachs. Citigroup. Mastercard. Visa. Tim Cook. Larry Fink. Stephen Schwarzman. In a personal capacity. I am also the Chief Strategy Officer of American Bitcoin. My qualifications for this role include mowing lawns on my father's golf courses, laying tile at his properties, and serving as a boardroom judge on The Apprentice from 2010 to 2015. I have no documented experience in cryptocurrency, blockchain, or Bitcoin mining. My stake in American Bitcoin alone was worth $548 million by September 2025 — eight months into my father's second term. We purchased 16,000 Bitmain mining rigs for $314 million. Bitmain is Chinese. Bitmain is headquartered in Beijing. Beijing is where I am visiting in a personal capacity. In March we bought 11,298 more. The terms were "unusual" — hundreds of millions in equipment for "future considerations." I'm not sure what "future considerations" means in this context, especially when your father sets the tariff rate on your supplier's home country. I can tell you it is not a "conflict of interest." It is a "supply chain relationship." On May 12, the day I boarded this plane, my father announced a trade agreement with China. Tariffs on Chinese goods dropped from 145 percent to 30 percent. That is a 115-point reduction on the country that manufactures my equipment, announced the same day I flew there. I did not know. I did not ask. I did not need to ask. My family owns 60 percent of World Liberty Financial. We receive 75 percent of every token sold. The New Yorker's running total is $4.2 billion. Politico documented $12.9 billion in trading volume. Let me tell you about our team. My brother Barron is our "DeFi visionary." He was eighteen years old. His prior experience is being tall. My brother Don is "Web3 Ambassador." His prior experience is selling condos and shooting elephants. I handle "strategic planning." My prior experience is tile. My brother-in-law Jared received $2 billion from the Saudi sovereign wealth fund six months after leaving the White House. The fund's own advisory panel flagged his "lack of private equity experience" and called the due diligence results "unsatisfactory." They gave him the money anyway. My sister Ivanka received Chinese government approval for 16 trademarks during my father's first term. The categories included handbags, sunglasses, perfume, baby blankets, and voting machines. Voting machines. From China. While her father was president. That is not "corruption." That is "brand diversification." My father spent four years on Hunter Biden. Four years. The charge: Hunter sat on the board of Burisma for $83,000 a month with no energy experience. My father called it the greatest corruption in American political history. He withheld $391 million in military aid to Ukraine to pressure an investigation. He was impeached for it. He did it again. A special counsel was appointed. Total cost to taxpayers: millions. Total Hunter earnings: $11 million over five years. Let me do the math my father never did. Hunter Biden made $6,027 per day. My family makes $8.75 million per day. That is 1,451 times Hunter's rate. We earn his entire five-year scandal every thirty hours. Hunter had no energy experience. I have no crypto experience. Hunter sat on one board. I run the operation. Hunter met one banker for a coffee. I sit on Air Force One beside $870 billion negotiating with the country that manufactures my equipment. But here is the part that makes me proud. We launched a cryptocurrency in my father's name. It peaked at $73. It trades today at $2.43. Retail investors lost 95 percent of their money. We collected $400 million in transaction fees regardless of price. We hosted a dinner — the top 220 holders gained entry by holding enough of my father's coin. The top 29 received a champagne toast with the President of the United States. Price of admission: approximately $3.28 million in tokens. A public school teacher earns $3.28 million in 47 years. We call that "community engagement." Not "selling access." Access is what Hunter Biden sold for a cup of coffee. Three days before I boarded this plane to Beijing, our team moved $12 million in memecoin assets to custody platforms. Routine. Unrelated. Everything is unrelated to everything. In a personal capacity. On January 24, 2025 — four days after the inauguration — my father fired seventeen inspectors general in a single night. Without explanation. Without notice to Congress. Seventeen. The people whose job is to look. He removed them all at once and no one replaced them. There is no inspector general for a son's "personal capacity." There is no disclosure form for love. There is no ethics office for a champagne toast priced at $3.28 million. He didn't bend the guardrails. He fired the people who hold them. He built that. I fly in on it. $4.2 billion at cruising altitude. Every thirty hours, another Hunter Biden. Hunter Biden got a special counsel for a cup of coffee and a board seat that paid less per month than one champagne toast with my father costs per million. I am the Executive Vice President of the Trump Organization. I am the Chief Strategy Officer of American Bitcoin. I am the Web3 strategic planner at World Liberty Financial. I am visiting the country that manufactures my mining rigs, approved my sister's trademarks, and funds my brother-in-law's private equity firm, on a plane beside $870 billion and a president who spent four years calling $11 million treason. In a personal capacity. As a supportive son.
1:07

I am the Executive Vice President of the Trump Organization. I am visiting China this week in a personal capacity as a supportive son. Normal people visit their mothers in a personal capacity. Normal people attend funerals in a personal capacity. I do it beside sixteen CEOs, five billionaires worth $870 billion, and a 500-aircraft Boeing order being finalized with Beijing during the trip. Goldman Sachs. Citigroup. Mastercard. Visa. Tim Cook. Larry Fink. Stephen Schwarzman. In a personal capacity. I am also the Chief Strategy Officer of American Bitcoin. My qualifications for this role include mowing lawns on my father's golf courses, laying tile at his properties, and serving as a boardroom judge on The Apprentice from 2010 to 2015. I have no documented experience in cryptocurrency, blockchain, or Bitcoin mining. My stake in American Bitcoin alone was worth $548 million by September 2025 — eight months into my father's second term. We purchased 16,000 Bitmain mining rigs for $314 million. Bitmain is Chinese. Bitmain is headquartered in Beijing. Beijing is where I am visiting in a personal capacity. In March we bought 11,298 more. The terms were "unusual" — hundreds of millions in equipment for "future considerations." I'm not sure what "future considerations" means in this context, especially when your father sets the tariff rate on your supplier's home country. I can tell you it is not a "conflict of interest." It is a "supply chain relationship." On May 12, the day I boarded this plane, my father announced a trade agreement with China. Tariffs on Chinese goods dropped from 145 percent to 30 percent. That is a 115-point reduction on the country that manufactures my equipment, announced the same day I flew there. I did not know. I did not ask. I did not need to ask. My family owns 60 percent of World Liberty Financial. We receive 75 percent of every token sold. The New Yorker's running total is $4.2 billion. Politico documented $12.9 billion in trading volume. Let me tell you about our team. My brother Barron is our "DeFi visionary." He was eighteen years old. His prior experience is being tall. My brother Don is "Web3 Ambassador." His prior experience is selling condos and shooting elephants. I handle "strategic planning." My prior experience is tile. My brother-in-law Jared received $2 billion from the Saudi sovereign wealth fund six months after leaving the White House. The fund's own advisory panel flagged his "lack of private equity experience" and called the due diligence results "unsatisfactory." They gave him the money anyway. My sister Ivanka received Chinese government approval for 16 trademarks during my father's first term. The categories included handbags, sunglasses, perfume, baby blankets, and voting machines. Voting machines. From China. While her father was president. That is not "corruption." That is "brand diversification." My father spent four years on Hunter Biden. Four years. The charge: Hunter sat on the board of Burisma for $83,000 a month with no energy experience. My father called it the greatest corruption in American political history. He withheld $391 million in military aid to Ukraine to pressure an investigation. He was impeached for it. He did it again. A special counsel was appointed. Total cost to taxpayers: millions. Total Hunter earnings: $11 million over five years. Let me do the math my father never did. Hunter Biden made $6,027 per day. My family makes $8.75 million per day. That is 1,451 times Hunter's rate. We earn his entire five-year scandal every thirty hours. Hunter had no energy experience. I have no crypto experience. Hunter sat on one board. I run the operation. Hunter met one banker for a coffee. I sit on Air Force One beside $870 billion negotiating with the country that manufactures my equipment. But here is the part that makes me proud. We launched a cryptocurrency in my father's name. It peaked at $73. It trades today at $2.43. Retail investors lost 95 percent of their money. We collected $400 million in transaction fees regardless of price. We hosted a dinner — the top 220 holders gained entry by holding enough of my father's coin. The top 29 received a champagne toast with the President of the United States. Price of admission: approximately $3.28 million in tokens. A public school teacher earns $3.28 million in 47 years. We call that "community engagement." Not "selling access." Access is what Hunter Biden sold for a cup of coffee. Three days before I boarded this plane to Beijing, our team moved $12 million in memecoin assets to custody platforms. Routine. Unrelated. Everything is unrelated to everything. In a personal capacity. On January 24, 2025 — four days after the inauguration — my father fired seventeen inspectors general in a single night. Without explanation. Without notice to Congress. Seventeen. The people whose job is to look. He removed them all at once and no one replaced them. There is no inspector general for a son's "personal capacity." There is no disclosure form for love. There is no ethics office for a champagne toast priced at $3.28 million. He didn't bend the guardrails. He fired the people who hold them. He built that. I fly in on it. $4.2 billion at cruising altitude. Every thirty hours, another Hunter Biden. Hunter Biden got a special counsel for a cup of coffee and a board seat that paid less per month than one champagne toast with my father costs per million. I am the Executive Vice President of the Trump Organization. I am the Chief Strategy Officer of American Bitcoin. I am the Web3 strategic planner at World Liberty Financial. I am visiting the country that manufactures my mining rigs, approved my sister's trademarks, and funds my brother-in-law's private equity firm, on a plane beside $870 billion and a president who spent four years calling $11 million treason. In a personal capacity. As a supportive son.

Peter Girnus 🦅

967,331 görüntüleme • 4 ay önce

🚨🚨🚨 Such an important story! Jan 21, 2024, Full Measure with Sharyl Attkisson (Sharyl Attkisson 🕵️‍♂️💼🥋), Don't forget Pfizer and the FDA tried to bury adverse events! Please watch, forward, email etc. Highlights------------------- Case 1 It's the story of Maddie, one of the children who took part in Pfizer's vaccine study on children. It's a remarkable account of what happened when Maddie got very, very sick, leading to accusations that Pfizer, the FDA and the study leaders tried to bury her case. In summer of 2020, Stephanie De Garay and her family learned an important clinical trial was about to be launched at nearby Cincinnati Children's Hospital. It would test Pfizer's experimental Covid-19 vaccine on 12 to 15 year olds to see if it was safe and effective. The De Garay's firmly pro-vaccine, didn't hesitate to let their children take part. Among three siblings, twelve year old Maddie alone was chosen to get two doses of Pfizer's vaccine, rather than a harmless placebo, it proved a fateful and debilitating roll of the dice. Her second dose was January 20 of 2021. So by the time she came home from school my husband called me at work and said, Maddie's having some sort of reaction. She had what she described as electrical shocks going up and down her spine. she said she felt like her heart was being ripped out. So chest pain, she had severe abdominal pain. She was hunched over when she walked through the door. Her toes and her fingers were white and they were like, when you touched them, they were ice cold and painful. Did you think right away that this was probably a vaccine reaction? "100%." De Garay says she was shocked when the lead study doctor offered no help. "I trusted the government. I trusted doctors. I trusted hospitals.... What I thought they were is not what they are." Case 2 Carrie Peterson Edberg's son Milo got the shot in December of 2021 and ended up with a serious heart problem that's associated with COVID vaccines. He got vaccinated on, like, a Friday. And on Sunday, he actually. Sunday morning at 01:00 a.m. Was on life support. He was diagnosed with myocarditis. doctors, of course, would not say it was vaccine-injured, but why would a six year old have myocarditis? Case 3 Daniel Hartman's 17 year old son was rushed to the hospital four days after his shot in September of 2021. My son Sean played hockey his whole life. To continue to play hockey, he had to get a vaccine. He took one Pfizer shot and died 33 days later. Answers4Sean 🇨🇦 Case 4 And 16 year old Ernesto, son of single parent Ernest Ramirez, dropped dead of an enlarged heart five days after his Pfizer Covid shot. When I got there, they were loading him up in the ambulance. I changed the ambulance to the hospital. When I got there, they were working on him at the hospital. There was a young doctor. He came out, he was. Your son's dead. You can go home. Ernest Ramirez ---------------------------------- Pfizer Cincinnati Children's Hospital and lead study scientist Dr. Robert Frenck declined comment and wouldn't answer our questions. Same with CDC, which also wouldn't tell us how many adverse event reports in children it's received for Covid vaccines. We asked federal health officials if they agree with Pfizer's published claim that, quote, there were no vaccine related serious adverse events in their study on children. But they declined to answer the question.
9:45

🚨🚨🚨 Such an important story! Jan 21, 2024, Full Measure with Sharyl Attkisson (Sharyl Attkisson 🕵️‍♂️💼🥋), Don't forget Pfizer and the FDA tried to bury adverse events! Please watch, forward, email etc. Highlights------------------- Case 1 It's the story of Maddie, one of the children who took part in Pfizer's vaccine study on children. It's a remarkable account of what happened when Maddie got very, very sick, leading to accusations that Pfizer, the FDA and the study leaders tried to bury her case. In summer of 2020, Stephanie De Garay and her family learned an important clinical trial was about to be launched at nearby Cincinnati Children's Hospital. It would test Pfizer's experimental Covid-19 vaccine on 12 to 15 year olds to see if it was safe and effective. The De Garay's firmly pro-vaccine, didn't hesitate to let their children take part. Among three siblings, twelve year old Maddie alone was chosen to get two doses of Pfizer's vaccine, rather than a harmless placebo, it proved a fateful and debilitating roll of the dice. Her second dose was January 20 of 2021. So by the time she came home from school my husband called me at work and said, Maddie's having some sort of reaction. She had what she described as electrical shocks going up and down her spine. she said she felt like her heart was being ripped out. So chest pain, she had severe abdominal pain. She was hunched over when she walked through the door. Her toes and her fingers were white and they were like, when you touched them, they were ice cold and painful. Did you think right away that this was probably a vaccine reaction? "100%." De Garay says she was shocked when the lead study doctor offered no help. "I trusted the government. I trusted doctors. I trusted hospitals.... What I thought they were is not what they are." Case 2 Carrie Peterson Edberg's son Milo got the shot in December of 2021 and ended up with a serious heart problem that's associated with COVID vaccines. He got vaccinated on, like, a Friday. And on Sunday, he actually. Sunday morning at 01:00 a.m. Was on life support. He was diagnosed with myocarditis. doctors, of course, would not say it was vaccine-injured, but why would a six year old have myocarditis? Case 3 Daniel Hartman's 17 year old son was rushed to the hospital four days after his shot in September of 2021. My son Sean played hockey his whole life. To continue to play hockey, he had to get a vaccine. He took one Pfizer shot and died 33 days later. Answers4Sean 🇨🇦 Case 4 And 16 year old Ernesto, son of single parent Ernest Ramirez, dropped dead of an enlarged heart five days after his Pfizer Covid shot. When I got there, they were loading him up in the ambulance. I changed the ambulance to the hospital. When I got there, they were working on him at the hospital. There was a young doctor. He came out, he was. Your son's dead. You can go home. Ernest Ramirez ---------------------------------- Pfizer Cincinnati Children's Hospital and lead study scientist Dr. Robert Frenck declined comment and wouldn't answer our questions. Same with CDC, which also wouldn't tell us how many adverse event reports in children it's received for Covid vaccines. We asked federal health officials if they agree with Pfizer's published claim that, quote, there were no vaccine related serious adverse events in their study on children. But they declined to answer the question.

aussie17

71,819 görüntüleme • 2 yıl önce

The video shows Philadelphia, USA. But what about Russia? The Russian regime fears neither protests nor its own oligarchs. Russia’s stability rests on the state’s ability to enforce obedience and on propaganda, not on shared consent or trust. It is enough for the regime that citizens are afraid and believe that nothing can be changed. According to sociological studies, 20-25% of Russians do not support Putin’s regime. That is one in five. But they are not ready to protest. The regime’s main pillar is its security apparatus. The FSB, national guard, interior ministry, prosecutor general’s office, investigative committee, military counterintelligence and the president’s personal security service do more than just suppress resistance. They control the elites, monitor one another, prevent conspiracies and keep discontent from turning into organized action. As long as this apparatus maintains a unified chain of command, any civilian protest can be isolated, intimidated, or suppressed. Russia’s security establishment also has the greatest interest in preserving the current order. The system gives them not only money and positions, but effective immunity, access to state resources, the ability to expropriate other’s property, and protection from accountability. For members of the security apparatus, the fall of the regime means the risk of losing everything at once. They therefore have a much stronger motivation to defend the system than ordinary officials, state employees or even most of big business. Big business benefits from the regime but does not constitute an independent center of power. Russia’s major owners can profit from government contracts, the war, monopolies and proximity to the Kremlin, but the state can arrest an owner, transfer an asset to another group or force a business to finance projects it needs. Oligarchs are therefore unlikely to be the first to oppose Putin. They may support a plot with resources, connections and money, but only after they see a split within the security apparatus and receive guarantees of protection. A second mechanism of stability is the disunity within the ruling coalition itself. The heads of security agencies, state corporations, regions and major business groups may be dissatisfied with Putin, the war or the redistribution of resources. But they do not trust one another and do not know who is actually ready to act. The first conspirator risks being betrayed by another who decides to demonstrate loyalty to the Kremlin. That is why discontent at the top can build for years without turning into open defiance. Economic problems remain manageable as long as the state can distribute losses unevenly. The regime can shift the costs of the war onto private businesses, regions, civilian industries and different groups of the population. It can also reward the loyalty of key groups with contracts, payments, positions, seized assets and new opportunities for enrichment. A falling standard of living or budget problems therefore do not automatically lead to a political crisis. The critical point may come when the center can no longer simultaneously finance the war, the security apparatus and the privileged groups whose loyalty ensures its survival. Mass discontent by itself is not a critical threat to the regime. People can be dissatisfied while continuing to obey the state out of fear. No street protest will matter for long and it will quickly be shut down if the security forces remain loyal to the regime. A protest can become critical, however, when it coincides with a split within the state apparatus. Under those conditions, even limited demonstrations can spread rapidly, and passivity can turn into mass disobedience. What might a split in the state apparatus look like? It will probably not be a dramatic event, and we may not immediately realize that anything is happening. A mid-ranking officer follows orders not out of loyalty, but because of the certainty that others will do the same, and that punishment for noncompliance is inevitable. When that certainty weakens, he does not suddenly join the protesters. He begins to act more slowly: asking for written confirmation, reporting an incomplete picture, "failing" to block a road in time, and so on. None of these actions alone is punishable, but together they slow down the state apparatus. The collapse of the security apparatus therefore does not necessarily look like units switching sides. It looks like action disappearing: orders are issued, confirmed - and not carried out. The first instance of public impunity could be the turning point. Fear is sustained by the inevitability of punishment; as soon as someone visibly fails to carry out an order and goes unpunished, the balance is upended before everyone’s eyes, and subsequent reassessments occur in a cascade - different people have different thresholds, and each subsequent instance of impunity adds to their boldness. The immediate trigger for such a protest will most likely be a sharp disruption of the established order. It could be unpaid salaries and military compensation, the collapse of regional budgets, an obvious military defeat, the return of large numbers of armed and disillusioned veterans, or a succession crisis. But even a severe shock does not guarantee protest: the state can redirect public anger toward lower-level officials, military commanders, oligarchs, migrants or an external enemy. For discontent to turn into protest, people need to feel that the risk of inaction has become greater than the risk of participation. They must lose not only comfort, but also confidence in their physical and material security. At the same time, they need to see that others share their dissatisfaction, that the authorities no longer fully control the situation and that the repressive apparatus cannot punish everyone. Without that shift, even a deeply dissatisfied society will remain passive. ‼️ Above all, a protest needs coordination and a focal point. It does not necessarily have to be a democratic opposition movement or a popular politician. It could be part of the ruling elite, a security faction, a respected military figure or a regional leader who demonstrates an ability to protect supporters and control resources. People rarely oppose a strong autocracy for an idea alone. They are much more likely to join once they see a real challenger to the regime and a possibility of victory. But even a successful protest would not automatically mean the democratization of Russia. The most likely result of a split would be a struggle among security and elite groups for control over the same centralized system. We would have little time to deepen that split and prevent the same regime from being recreated under a new leader.
2:55

The video shows Philadelphia, USA. But what about Russia? The Russian regime fears neither protests nor its own oligarchs. Russia’s stability rests on the state’s ability to enforce obedience and on propaganda, not on shared consent or trust. It is enough for the regime that citizens are afraid and believe that nothing can be changed. According to sociological studies, 20-25% of Russians do not support Putin’s regime. That is one in five. But they are not ready to protest. The regime’s main pillar is its security apparatus. The FSB, national guard, interior ministry, prosecutor general’s office, investigative committee, military counterintelligence and the president’s personal security service do more than just suppress resistance. They control the elites, monitor one another, prevent conspiracies and keep discontent from turning into organized action. As long as this apparatus maintains a unified chain of command, any civilian protest can be isolated, intimidated, or suppressed. Russia’s security establishment also has the greatest interest in preserving the current order. The system gives them not only money and positions, but effective immunity, access to state resources, the ability to expropriate other’s property, and protection from accountability. For members of the security apparatus, the fall of the regime means the risk of losing everything at once. They therefore have a much stronger motivation to defend the system than ordinary officials, state employees or even most of big business. Big business benefits from the regime but does not constitute an independent center of power. Russia’s major owners can profit from government contracts, the war, monopolies and proximity to the Kremlin, but the state can arrest an owner, transfer an asset to another group or force a business to finance projects it needs. Oligarchs are therefore unlikely to be the first to oppose Putin. They may support a plot with resources, connections and money, but only after they see a split within the security apparatus and receive guarantees of protection. A second mechanism of stability is the disunity within the ruling coalition itself. The heads of security agencies, state corporations, regions and major business groups may be dissatisfied with Putin, the war or the redistribution of resources. But they do not trust one another and do not know who is actually ready to act. The first conspirator risks being betrayed by another who decides to demonstrate loyalty to the Kremlin. That is why discontent at the top can build for years without turning into open defiance. Economic problems remain manageable as long as the state can distribute losses unevenly. The regime can shift the costs of the war onto private businesses, regions, civilian industries and different groups of the population. It can also reward the loyalty of key groups with contracts, payments, positions, seized assets and new opportunities for enrichment. A falling standard of living or budget problems therefore do not automatically lead to a political crisis. The critical point may come when the center can no longer simultaneously finance the war, the security apparatus and the privileged groups whose loyalty ensures its survival. Mass discontent by itself is not a critical threat to the regime. People can be dissatisfied while continuing to obey the state out of fear. No street protest will matter for long and it will quickly be shut down if the security forces remain loyal to the regime. A protest can become critical, however, when it coincides with a split within the state apparatus. Under those conditions, even limited demonstrations can spread rapidly, and passivity can turn into mass disobedience. What might a split in the state apparatus look like? It will probably not be a dramatic event, and we may not immediately realize that anything is happening. A mid-ranking officer follows orders not out of loyalty, but because of the certainty that others will do the same, and that punishment for noncompliance is inevitable. When that certainty weakens, he does not suddenly join the protesters. He begins to act more slowly: asking for written confirmation, reporting an incomplete picture, "failing" to block a road in time, and so on. None of these actions alone is punishable, but together they slow down the state apparatus. The collapse of the security apparatus therefore does not necessarily look like units switching sides. It looks like action disappearing: orders are issued, confirmed - and not carried out. The first instance of public impunity could be the turning point. Fear is sustained by the inevitability of punishment; as soon as someone visibly fails to carry out an order and goes unpunished, the balance is upended before everyone’s eyes, and subsequent reassessments occur in a cascade - different people have different thresholds, and each subsequent instance of impunity adds to their boldness. The immediate trigger for such a protest will most likely be a sharp disruption of the established order. It could be unpaid salaries and military compensation, the collapse of regional budgets, an obvious military defeat, the return of large numbers of armed and disillusioned veterans, or a succession crisis. But even a severe shock does not guarantee protest: the state can redirect public anger toward lower-level officials, military commanders, oligarchs, migrants or an external enemy. For discontent to turn into protest, people need to feel that the risk of inaction has become greater than the risk of participation. They must lose not only comfort, but also confidence in their physical and material security. At the same time, they need to see that others share their dissatisfaction, that the authorities no longer fully control the situation and that the repressive apparatus cannot punish everyone. Without that shift, even a deeply dissatisfied society will remain passive. ‼️ Above all, a protest needs coordination and a focal point. It does not necessarily have to be a democratic opposition movement or a popular politician. It could be part of the ruling elite, a security faction, a respected military figure or a regional leader who demonstrates an ability to protect supporters and control resources. People rarely oppose a strong autocracy for an idea alone. They are much more likely to join once they see a real challenger to the regime and a possibility of victory. But even a successful protest would not automatically mean the democratization of Russia. The most likely result of a split would be a struggle among security and elite groups for control over the same centralized system. We would have little time to deepen that split and prevent the same regime from being recreated under a new leader.

Anton Gerashchenko

26,150 görüntüleme • 23 gün önce