Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

На главную

Officer pulls firearm on citizen (gets quickly educated) that is just exercising his 2A rights. Dude could not have handled this better. ​A routine walk down a public sidewalk in Horicon, Wisconsin, quickly turned into a high-stakes Fourth Amendment violation when a police officer responded to concerned citizen calls...

48,442 просмотров • 12 дней назад •via X (Twitter)

Комментарии: 33

Фото профиля Jesse
Jesse12 дней назад

The officer admits he's totally fine with what the man's doing. So why do you need his identification if what he he recognized, what he's doing was legal.

Фото профиля pierre
pierre12 дней назад

These fucking pigs need an education from the mass public this shit is ridiculous

Фото профиля Kaz
Kaz12 дней назад

That cop is so fat his knees are buckling under the pressure. Whatever happened to fitness standards?!

Фото профиля Richard
Richard12 дней назад

This tyrant cannot articulate a crime without articulating a crime. There is no law being broken. And we, the people do not have to prove who we are by showing I d that is a constitutional right

Фото профиля Ray Cistman
Ray Cistman12 дней назад

He was so very lucky this cop was fine with legal activities

Фото профиля Kaz
Kaz12 дней назад

No one's FEELINGS trump my RIGHTS.

Фото профиля joshua abbott
joshua abbott12 дней назад

The reason they want our IDs so bad is that once they scan our ID it goes into the system and on Wall Street a bond is created and the cops make fucking money off of it! Fuck the police and their corrupt fucking system!

Фото профиля John
John12 дней назад

Things have changed a lot in the lower 48 since I was young. This would never have happened then. Today, in Alaska, I was shopping with my 44 mag holstered on my chest. No one cared. These changes of fear come from the media. There are powers who want to take our guns.

Фото профиля AOC Anti-Woke List Prisoner #1256
AOC Anti-Woke List Prisoner #125612 дней назад

Everyone need to tell them: if people are calling then why the hell don't you tell them it's completely legal and to stop calling wasting our time???

Фото профиля P.T. Matthews
P.T. Matthews12 дней назад

If more citizens carried out in open, and handling education started earlier, there would be a MUCH MORE POLITE SOCIETY

Фото профиля Anita F.
Anita F.12 дней назад

Why do they pass these open carry gun laws then detain and hassle people who are simply following the law?

Фото профиля Tina Moore
Tina Moore12 дней назад

Should get some exercise it’s a little fat and if you have to chase somebody down, he’d lose

Фото профиля 𝔹𝕚𝕕𝕚𝕟 𝕋𝕚𝕞Σ
𝔹𝕚𝕕𝕚𝕟 𝕋𝕚𝕞Σ12 дней назад

They need to be trained better. They don’t have a right to see ID just because someone is suspicious.

Фото профиля Tina Moore
Tina Moore12 дней назад

But dickhead you’re breaking the law you’re violating his rights go away

Фото профиля Ian
Ian12 дней назад

Fuck the police

Фото профиля Mr. Miyagi (Unmasked)
Mr. Miyagi (Unmasked)12 дней назад

The dispatcher should inform concerned citizens that it is completely legal What this man is doing and to quit wasting emergency services. 😉

Фото профиля Roxanna Slater
Roxanna Slater12 дней назад

These idiots should have to pass a fitness test. He clearly couldn't outrun a turtle.

Фото профиля Vincent
Vincent12 дней назад

“People are scared” ok…. My freedom and rights don’t end where your fear begins. Now please fuck offf There are literally more guns than there is people in America, gun a tools just like any other, cops need to understand that and stop being fucking pussys.

Фото профиля P.T. Matthews
P.T. Matthews12 дней назад

#RAS Reasonable AND Articulable Suspicion @JudgeJeanine is probably the best person I know of to help explain this to police. She hates a shitty case handling. @JonathanTurley rivals her disdain for laziness!

Фото профиля -Truth in 617-
-Truth in 617-12 дней назад

Don’t ever give your phone number to law enforcement. They will use it to find out who you are just try it

Фото профиля Jerry Powers
Jerry Powers12 дней назад

The only thing that fat fuck needs to see is his next doughnut.

Фото профиля Anthony Kessler | Moderate 🇺🇸
Anthony Kessler | Moderate 🇺🇸12 дней назад

“I have to see your ID”

Фото профиля pierre
pierre12 дней назад

They want to give us that right the right was given by God fuck them pigs fuck them

Фото профиля Yte
Yte12 дней назад

If you're going to record then RECORD! Don't half ass it so all we see are crotches and feet!

Фото профиля Joe Geronimo
Joe Geronimo12 дней назад

See how they try to use today society people are going to call

Фото профиля joshua abbott
joshua abbott12 дней назад

All would’ve had to do was just turn and run that fat piece of shit never would’ve caught him!

Фото профиля Calm N. Sense
Calm N. Sense12 дней назад

@grok yet another one scuzzy prick

Фото профиля rebelyell77
rebelyell7712 дней назад

Another lawsuit incoming

Фото профиля PickleMick
PickleMick12 дней назад

Another cop that doesint know the law

Фото профиля Jawa
Jawa12 дней назад

How's a fictitious "call" Remove human rights And constitutional rights.. Oh that's right. Extortion done by a foreign power adamantly forcing the removal of rights for their profitability usurps all rights. While they have a supposed oath to the constitution 🤣.

Фото профиля Greg Scott
Greg Scott12 дней назад

I bet you anything those 2 pigs were bullied and beaten up in school sooooo now they’re going to get back at the citizens and show us all how big and bad they are

Фото профиля film the cops everywhere 🛠️
film the cops everywhere 🛠️12 дней назад

The quickest way to end it other than shooting the cop on sight is to ask "am I going to be arrested if I don't give you my id?" it gives you something for court if he says yes, some of the pigs will back peddle, they might still fuck with you but they know you mean business.

Фото профиля Max
Max12 дней назад

Do they get paid every time they run our id? Is that why they’re obsessed with getting it no matter what people do?

Похожие видео

This cop has never been put in his place like this man just did. He needed a broom to sweep up the pieces of his shattered ego. An independent journalist outside Barnes Hall U.S. Army Reserve Center at 6201 East Oak Street in Phoenix, Arizona was outside the facility’s secure perimeter filming for a story. What should have been a non-incident quickly spiraled into an ego-driven showdown. ​A uniformed service member named Jared confronted the journalist, claiming that filming a federal facility is a "no-go" under heightened security. When the journalist stood his ground on the public utility strip, military personnel called local police for backup. ​Once on scene, a patrol officer attempted to demand identification and falsely claimed the journalist was trespassing on federal property. The encounter quickly escalated when the officer would not even answer the question as to his name and badge number is and went straight into copsplaing mode. ​The journalist held his ground with simple, vital legal boundaries: "Have I committed a crime?" and "Am I detained?" ​Unable to articulate any reasonable suspicion of criminal activity, and unable to legally enforce private property rules on an easement open to the public, the officer was forced to take the walk of shame back to patrol unit #91131. However, not before being on the receiving end of an epic take down by a man that knew his rights and was not going to allow the cop to infringe on them for even a second. You can bet this cop has never had a citizen speak to him in this fashion before and he was picking up the pieces of his shattered ego all the way back to his car. ​Department of Homeland Security and Department of Defense guidelines are clear: recording from public space is a constitutionally protected right, and citizens are under zero obligation to answer questions or surrender ID during a consensual encounter. ​Know your rights. Stand on public ground. Hold public officials accountable.

Giggling Gannon

45,895 просмотров • 15 дней назад

Tyrant deputies harass a man that is trying to legally open carry. He unloads on them for violating his rights as they all take the walk of shame. ​In Brevard County, Florida, Michael Taylor went out for a lawful walk to a fishing spot less than a mile away exercising his rights 2A style, carrying a crab net, bait bag, and an openly holstered .22 caliber sidearm. Under Florida Statute § 790.25(3)(h), openly carrying a firearm is explicitly legal when engaged in, or traveling directly to or from, fishing, hunting, or camping. ​Instead of recognizing a clear statutory exemption, Brevard County deputies demonstrated an alarming display of legal incompetence: ​ Deputies swarmed him based purely on 911 calls reporting a man with a gun. Under Florida’s Stop and Frisk law (F.S. § 901.151), detention requires reasonable, articulable suspicion that a crime has been, is being, or is about to be committed.Simply exercising a codified right is not a crime. ​ When Taylor lawfully refused to provide ID, deputies escalated, wrongly insisting he had an affirmative duty to prove his innocence on the sidewalk before being allowed to walk away. Under the guise of officer safety, deputies seized his firearm and rifled through his personal gear, completely ignoring Fourth Amendment protections against unreasonable searches and seizures. ​ Deputies tried to justify their stop by demanding to inspect his Florida recreational fishing license under F.S. § 379.354, completely blind to the fact that their local authority doesn't override the lack of criminal predicate as well as none of them have the authority as they are not FWC. Taylor even cited F.S. § 379.105 (harassment of lawful hunters and fishermen) to a line of badge-wearing public servants who looked visibly baffled by their own state's penal code. ​It took roughly nine armed deputies on the side of a road, standing in an awkward cluster of walkie-talkies and scratched heads, to figure out what a citizen knew all along: no crime had been committed. ​After repeatedly violating his Fourth and Second Amendment rights, demanding ID they were never entitled to receive, and realizing they had zero legal footing to make an arrest, the deputies handed his unloaded firearm back in a blatant walk of shame. ​Swearing an oath to defend the Constitution means nothing if you refuse to read it. When nine armed officers don't know the law, citizens don't get policing—they get armed intimidation under color of law.

Giggling Gannon

27,974 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

Sergeant has zero understanding of the law, gets schooled as he becomes unglued. Westmont Police Sergeant Confronted by Independent Journalist over First Amendment Rights. ​A Westmont Police Department Sergeant, tasked with supervising officers and upholding the law, recently demonstrated a clear misunderstanding of basic constitutional protections during an encounter with an independent journalist. ​When the Sergeant attempted to claim that filming from a public space violated LEADS regulations due to visible information on an unshielded laptop screen, the journalist stood his ground. He clearly articulated established court precedents—including ACLU v. Alvarez, Glick v. Cunniffe, and Terry v. Ohio—reminding the officer that citizens have a protected right to record public officials performing their duties in public spaces. Furthermore, the journalist pointed out that officers bear the responsibility of securing their own confidential screens, rather than infringing on a citizen's constitutional rights. ​Faced with unwavering legal knowledge and no valid legal grounds for detention, the Sergeant was forced to disengage and leave the scene doing that walk of shame as he realized in the back of his head that he is about to become a social media star in a bad way. Know your rights and do not be afraid to stand up and exercise them. Together we will continue to make those that swore to protect the constitution but fail to do so famous. Meet officer Sergeant Rolando Padilla of the Westmont IL PD.

Giggling Gannon

103,088 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

Bully officer that does not know the law costs his department 41,000 dollars. ​The incident took place outside the Pueblo Police Department in Colorado, where an independent journalist known as O'Connel was filming and taking photos from a public sidewalk. As we all know this a protected right that we all have. This journalist is exercising those very rights. Officer Romero notices O'Connel recording police vehicles and the building. He approaches and demands to know who O'Connel is and what he's doing. ​O'Connel exercises his right to remain silent and attempts to walk away. Instead of letting him go, Officer Romero immediately grabs him and places him in handcuffs. ​ When pressed on why he is detaining the citizen, Officer Romero claims he has "reasonable suspicion." However, as O'Connel rightly points out on the scene, recording from a public sidewalk and refusing to answer a police officer's questions is not a crime, nor does it establish reasonable suspicion of a crime. The moment Captain Martin (the supervisor) arrives on the scene, the entire dynamic shifts. Captain Martin instantly recognizes the situation, identifies O'Connell as he has seen his work, and tells Officer Romero point-blank: "He has every right to do that." ​The supervisor orders the immediate release of the journalist, leaving the arresting officer to face a swift internal affairs complaint for deprivation of rights and illegal detainment. In the end in order to avoid litigation caused by the incompetence of officer Romero, their department settled for 41,000 dollars.

Giggling Gannon

435,914 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад

You know the department is bad when even the Chief does not understand the law! They all get owned and do the walk of shame. ​A textbook lesson in constitutional rights unfolded right outside a Central Bank branch in Millstadt, Illinois, proving once again that public photography is not a crime—no matter how uncomfortable it makes the local authorities. ​It all started when a journalist was standing strictly on a public sidewalk and easement, minding his own business while on his cellphone. Because of the freezing winter weather, he was wearing a face mask. After looking toward the bank windows and checking out a balloon display inside, nervous bank employees called the Millstadt Police Department to report a "suspicious" masked individual filming the building. ​Officers Jacob Fowler and A. Smiddy arrived on the scene and immediately tried to flip the script. They demanded the auditor’s identification, claiming they needed to "document" his information so they could formally trespass him on behalf of the bank. ​The Police: Claimed that looking inside a bank window while wearing a mask on a freezing day constitutes "reasonable articulable suspicion" of a crime. They repeatedly called the journalist "uncooperative" simply for refusing to surrender his ID. ​The journalist: Kept his composure and stood his ground. He stood firmly on a public right-of-way, reminding the officers of his Fourth Amendment protections against unreasonable searches and seizures. When officers claimed they were trespassing him from the property, he hit them with the ultimate logic check: "I was never on their property... Are you trespassing my eyeballs?" ​Realizing they had zero legal leverage to force compliance or make an arrest, the officers quickly ran out of answers. After a third officer arrived to hand out a business card (which was politely declined), the police finally admitted they knew exactly how this works—conceding that the journalist was within his rights to film them and post the interaction to online. ​With no law broken and no leg to stand on, the officers chose to disengage and walk away defeated. ​Know your rights, know the law, and never let them trespass your eyeballs.

Giggling Gannon

41,285 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

Two rogue cops violate this journalist's one officer losing his job and an undisclosed settlement. A citizen journalist named Roland Reyes was recording a traffic accident scene from a public sidewalk for a local community Facebook page when he was approached by Lake Jackson Police Officers Johnny Cagle and Oscar Mendoza. ​Officer Cagle demanded that Reyes leave the scene and identify himself, falsely claiming that taking photographs of vehicles and license plates in public was illegal. Reyes knowing his rights refused to leave, asserting his right to document the scene from public property. It was clear by the response from the officers that they had zero knowledge of the laws and the constitutional rights that they swore to protect. Seeing that Reyes was going to stand his ground and not be intimidated by these tyrants, ​without ever stating that Reyes was under arrest or commanding him to show his hands, the officers tackled him to the ground. ​The handling of the arrest drew immediate backlash: ​Following the scuffle, Officer Cagle claimed injuries and took the ambulance to the hospital. Reyes, the victim, was handcuffed, transported in a squad car, and kept tied to a hospital bed during treatment before being released an hour later. ​ The City of Lake Jackson issued a statement admitting the officers acted on an "erroneous understanding of law" and that Reyes was legally filming. ​ Officer Cagle resigned from the force before he could be formally terminated, while Officer Mendoza was suspended without pay and ordered to undergo remedial civil rights training. ​Reyes subsequently retained a lawyer to file a civil lawsuit against the officers and the police department for the violation of his First and Fourth Amendment rights. His case was settled out of court for an undisclosed amount.

Giggling Gannon

110,876 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

Officer and Sergeant tag team violating this guy's rights until the Sergeant realizes they were both wrong. ​Let’s talk about reasonable suspicion, constitutional literacy, and blatant unlawful detainment. ​ Christopher Biederstedt (IDC Chris) was standing on a traditional public sidewalk filming the exterior of the Mendota Lutheran Home in Mendota, IL. He was on the public sidewalk only. He trespassed on no property. He was merely exercising a right protected by decades of established Supreme Court precedent and granted to us by the constitution. ​Yet, what followed was a textbook display of officer incompetence and disregard for the Fourth Amendment. ​Officer Holland arrived on scene and immediately ordered Chris to stop walking and recording, escalating a consensual encounter straight into a non-consensual Terry stop. Her stated justification? That people inside were "upset" and that she was investigating "disorderly conduct" under Illinois law. ​Here is the fundamental legal reality: Public photography from a public sidewalk is not a crime, and citizen discomfort does not create reasonable, articulable suspicion. ​Instead of investigating whether an actual crime had occurred, Officer Holland slapped handcuffs on Biederstedt, depriving him of his liberty, and actively went to solicit a criminal complaint from a staff member after the fact. Placing someone in cuffs first and fishing for a charge later is the definition of an unlawful seizure. ​Then comes Sergeant Stewart. While some praise the sergeant for ultimately shutting down the arrest, the reality is that the sergeant contributed directly to an ongoing Fourth Amendment violation. Rather than immediately establishing whether lawful grounds existed to keep a citizen in handcuffs, the sergeant stood there interrogating Biederstedt, demanding explanations, and attempting to lecture him on cooperation while he remained unlawfully restrained. Supervisors are supposed to prevent constitutional violations in real time—not participate in an illegal detention before finally realizing their subordinate manufactured a baseless disorderly conduct charge. ​Only after Officer Holland returned ready to transport Biederstedt to jail did Sergeant Stewart finally state the obvious: walking on a sidewalk and filming a building from the outside is completely legal, no matter who is bothered by it. ​Biederstedt was unhandcuffed and released without charges. There are no public records or filings indicating that a formal federal civil rights lawsuit (42 U.S.C. § 1983) was pursued following the incident, but cases like this serve as a glaring reminder: if officers don't know the basic threshold of a lawful Terry stop, your rights are only as safe as the incompetence in uniform on scene. ​Know your rights. You are allowed to film in public from public spaces. Hold authority accountable to your rights, it is your right to exercise those God given rights.

Giggling Gannon

21,585 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

It's astounding how ignorant this female cop is on the law. When public photography gets treated as a potential crime, knowing your rights makes all the difference. ​In this bodycam encounter out of Kansas City, Missouri, KCPD Officer Sarah Holland responded to a call regarding an independent journalist filming near bank branches along Ward Parkway. Prior to arrival, dispatch discussions framed the activity as potentially "casing" the locations, leading to immediate tension upon contact. ​When Officer Holland arrived, she demanded the journalist’s identification. The journalist maintained that he was standing strictly on a public sidewalk, gathering content for a story, and declined to provide ID without reasonable, articulable suspicion of an actual crime. Despite his assertion of First Amendment rights and city easement protections, Officer Holland placed him in handcuffs, insisting he was legally detained for refusing to leave after the bank requested it. ​The situation escalated until a field supervisor arrived on scene to assess the stop. After questioning bank management and surveying the area, the supervisor stepped in to correct the procedural missteps, clarifying that standing on a public sidewalk to record is constitutionally protected activity and that police cannot simply demand identification or detain an individual without reasonable suspicion of criminal conduct. ​Ultimately, because the journalist remained in public space he was uncuffed and released without identifying himself or facing charges. ​A textbook breakdown of public easement rights, stop-and-identify standards, and why supervisor intervention matters on the street. The scary part is you have to wonder how many people's rights has this woman violated through her career. She needs re-education on the constitution that she swore to protect.

Giggling Ganon

22,974 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

This guy owned these troopers with his knowledge of his rights as well as is and is not a law. ​This traffic stop involving the Ohio State Highway Patrol is one of the most legendary examples of a citizen dropping that education bomb that you will ever witness. What started as a completely routine stop for an expired registration tag quickly devolved into a prolonged, high-stakes debate over constitutional boundaries, officer ego, and the exact limits of police authority. ​If you want to know how to stand your ground calmly, articulate your rights under pressure, and dismantle "contempt of cop" in real-time, this is the video to check out. ​The stop began lawfully—the driver had an expired tag. But the entire energy shifted the second the driver disclosed he was recording the interaction for his own protection. ​After exiting his vehicle, the driver placed his hands in his pockets. Citing vague "officer safety concerns," the troopers immediately ordered him to remove his hands and prepared to conduct a pat-down frisk for weapons. The driver openly consented to a limited weapons check just to clear the air, but what followed was an absolute clinic on why law enforcement cannot use "safety" as a blank check to violate your civil liberties. ​The absolute moral of this entire encounter is the profound legal education this citizen handed to these troopers. While the officers attempted to rely on intimidation and commands like "stop talking and listen," the driver consistently hammered them with actual constitutional law: ​Terry v. Ohio & Pennsylvania v. Mimms: Under Mimms, an officer can order you out of a vehicle during a lawful stop. However, as this citizen correctly pointed out, that doesn't mean they get a free pass to frisk you. Under Terry, a pat-down requires a distinct, articulable "reasonable suspicion" that you are armed and dangerous. Stepping out of a car and putting your hands in your pockets during a routine paperwork stop does not automatically strip you of your Fourth Amendment rights. ​Rodriguez v. United States (2015): This is where the driver completely shut down the escalation. The Supreme Court has ruled that a traffic stop cannot be prolonged beyond the time reasonably required to complete its initial mission (writing the ticket/warning and checking registration). Once the troopers issued the warning, the stop was legally over. By continuing to detain him, command his movements, and lecture him, they were operating outside the law. ​City of Houston v. Hill: The troopers repeatedly tried to silence the driver for challenging them. But under the First Amendment, citizens have an absolute, protected right to verbally criticize, oppose, and argue with police officers, so long as they aren't physically obstructing justice. Standing your ground and speaking truth to power is not a crime. ​The encounter ended with the driver leaving with just a warning for the expired tag, but the real victory was the massive precedent he set on that roadside. ​This wasn't an citizen being difficult for the sake of views; this was a citizen drawing a hard, intellectual line between what is actual law and what is just an officer's feelings. When law enforcement operates out of ego, they rely on compliance through fear. The only antidote to that fear is a rigid, unshakeable knowledge of your constitutional rights. ​Know your rights. Protect your rights. And never let someone abuse authority just because they wear a badge.

Giggling Ganon

39,826 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад

Tyrant cop gets his feelings hurt by a camera. Owned from beginning to the end by this journalist. We are in unincorporated Riverside County, California, when a bystander stepped in to film a routine traffic stop involving Riverside Police Department Field Training Officer (FTO) Vicente De La Torre (Badge #1222) and backup Officer Miller (Badge #1565). The journalist, immediately challenged Officer De La Torre’s legal authority, arguing that because the stop was taking place in unincorporated county territory, the municipal city officer lacked jurisdiction to conduct traffic enforcement. ​The journalist kept shouting legal advice to the driver that was pulled over, urging him to invoke his 5th Amendment and fight the ticket because the officer had no jurisdiction. Officer De La Torre got his ego crushed and decided to confront the journalists. This verbal takedown only got worse for the officer from there. ​The journalist held his ground, reminding the officer that purely verbal commentary while recording from a public vantage point is First Amendment-protected activity, famously firing back that "interference is not speech." The situation escalated further when Officer De La Torre reached toward his taser, the journalist threw out immediate accusations of officer intimidation under California’s Tom Bane Civil Rights Act and warnings of personal liability under Malley v. Briggs. ​When Officer Miller arrived on scene to check if backup was needed, De La Torre was wrapping up and getting ready to do the walk of shame as he knew his conduct was out of line when his feelings got hurt and it's all on film. This is how to handle a Tyrant. This dude owned him from the beginning to the very end.

Giggling Gannon

97,087 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

Officer has zero regards for rights of the journalist, Sgt arrives says hold my beer and takes dumb to the next level. This is a longer one, but well worth it to experience this Sgt. This journalist is out exercising his first amendment rights on a public sidewalk. Chase bank decided to call the police to have the journalist removed. An officer arrives first and tries to tell the journalist that he cannot record on a public sidewalk he then calls out his supervisor. ​The moment Sgt. Kurgxbon arrives and claims that a public municipal sidewalk is part of the bank’s "curtilage" and that a journalist can be trespassed from standing there, she instantly loses all legal credibility as well. ​The Definition of Curtilage: By definition, curtilage applies to the immediate, private area surrounding a home or dwelling where there is a reasonable expectation of privacy. You cannot claim "curtilage" on a public, concrete sidewalk in the middle of downtown Baltimore just because it sits in front of a Chase Bank. ​Traditional Public Forums: The United States Supreme Court has made it abundantly clear for decades: public sidewalks are the quintessential "traditional public forum." Journalists and citizens alike have an absolute, protected First Amendment right to stand on them, gather news, film what is in plain view, and exist without having to justify their presence to law enforcement. ​The "Pass-Through" Myth: Telling a journalist they have the right to "walk through" but not stand still on a public sidewalk to gather footage is a completely fabricated rule. If you are legally allowed to be in a space, you are legally allowed to stand there. ​What’s most alarming here isn't just that the officers don't know the law—it's their absolute willingness to enforce a violation of rights anyway. Instead of educating the bank employee on public property laws, Officer Allender and the Sergeant choose to escalate, threaten a trespass warning, and attempt to intimidate a journalist who is doing absolutely nothing illegal. ​When law enforcement prioritizes a business's comfort over constitutional rights and press freedom, they transition from peace officers to corporate security guards funded by taxpayers. ​This is why these types of activities need to be done. It's mind blowing just how ignorant these officers are. It's scary and comical at the same time.

Giggling Ganon

61,732 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад

Man proves your rights do not change due to the weather outside or the time of day. At around 3:00 AM during snowfall, an individual equipped with a long rifle, tactical vest, and face covering was walking along a public sidewalk near Rocky Mountain Motors. He stated he was out "training" in cold-weather gear. ​ Englewood police officers approached and ordered the man to place his hands on his head, detaining him and placing him in handcuffs dispite no crime being committed that they could articulate. The man immediately invoked his First, Second, and Fourth Amendment rights, arguing that open carry of a firearm is lawful in the state and that officers lacked reasonable articulable suspicion of criminal activity. ​In the eyes of these officers, walking with a rifle outdoors at 3:00 AM during a snowstorm raised suspicion and justified stopping him for identification. When pressed on which law or ordinance was violated, officers acknowledged that open carry itself was not illegal and quickly realized that the constitution does not change based on the time of day. ​Lacking grounds or an articulated criminal infraction to mandate identification or prolong detention, officers ultimately removed the handcuffs and released the individual without charges. While it was great to eee these officers realize their error as the light bulb clicked on in their brains that what they were doing was in violation of this man's rights. Unfortunately we know in other areas with different officers, this could have turned out much worse. This is why it's important that men like this gentleman, test our rights for us to help educate these cops that they must actually honor the oath that they all took to defend the constitution of our country. Know your rights folks, and do not fear exercising them.

Giggling Gannon

81,548 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

Guy has his ADA rights violated over his service dog. Puts on a clinic exercising his rights. ​ Brandon Hopkins and his service dog, Jack Jack, attempted to address a newly announced venue policy. Fairgrounds management had instituted a rule restricting service animals strictly to designated camping and trailer areas. ​Under Title II and Title III of the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), service animals must be permitted to accompany individuals with disabilities into all areas of a facility where the general public is allowed to go. Blanket-relegating service dogs to campsites is a direct breach of federal law. ​When Brandon approached regional chairperson Ms. Crowder at the fairgrounds office to seek clarification on this non-compliant policy, she refused to engage in a constructive dialogue, slammed the door, and demanded he be removed from the grounds. ​Enter Officer James Wyss (Badge #109) of the Berrien Springs-Oronoko Township Police Department. ​Despite Brandon remaining calm, identifying himself verbally as Brandon Hopkins, and explaining the situation, Officer Wyss repeatedly demanded physical identification under threat of arrest for criminal trespass and disorderly conduct. ​When Brandon peacefully exercised his Fourth and Fifth Amendment protections—refusing to hand over physical ID during an encounter where no reasonable articulable suspicion of a crime existed—Officer Wyss escalated the pressure. ​Even as Brandon complied with the directive to leave the property and walked toward his vehicle, Officer Wyss followed him through the parking lot. The officer then attempted to justify his continued demands for ID by claiming Brandon might match someone with pending warrants from "St. Joe Police," suggesting that failing to clear up the suspicion could constitute "obstruction of justice." ​Under Michigan law and long-standing constitutional precedent: ​Pedestrians are not required to hand over physical photo ID on demand without Reasonable Articulable Suspicion (RAS) of a crime. ​Questioning an ADA-violating venue policy is First Amendment protected activity. ​Asserting your rights and declining to present ID during a non-criminal encounter does not constitute physical obstruction. ​Brandon maintained his composure throughout the extended exchange, stood firm on his constitutional rights, and ultimately departed the premises without arrest or citation. ​Know your rights because unfortunately officers like this and worse are out there. It's a small number of bad apples that unfortunately spoil the whole lost by their actions.

Giggling Gannon

93,809 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

Two tyrants get schooled on citizen rights. Mind blowing what the do not know. ​Outside a Cleveland County Sheriff’s Office facility in North Carolina, an independent journalist began filming from a publicly accessible county parking lot. Two deputies, one of which named including Sergeant McNigley quickly approached him. The officers demanded to see his ID, claiming he was acting suspiciously by filming patrol vehicles and insisting the area was "private county property." Class is in session from that point on. ​The journalist stood his ground on Identification: He calmly educates the officers on the law, reminding them that North Carolina is not a "stop and identify" state. Without reasonable, articulable suspicion of a crime, law enforcement cannot compel a citizen to present identification. ​Refuting the "Private Property" Myth: When the deputies claim the parking lot is private county property, the journalist correctly counters that public facilities funded by taxpayers are subject to public access and First Amendment protection when visible from public space. ​De-escalating the Pressure: Despite repeated attempts at intimidation and circular arguments about authority, the journalist remains composed, eventually forcing the officers to admit he is not being detained. ​In the end, the officers are forced to let him walk away—proving once again why understanding your constitutional rights is your greatest defense. The journalist did an incredible job refusing to bow to unlawful demands and standing tall for civil liberties. This is how it's done.

Giggling Gannon

28,303 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

This officer knew he screwed up and he took off quickly with his buddies. This journalist approaches Cowlitz County Sheriff’s Deputy Wolf (#432) parked in an idle cruiser in Longview, Washington. The journalist approached the sitting vehicle to question the deputy and request his identification, Deputy Wolf exited his patrol unit, flashed a bright light directly into the camera, and tried to go into investigating mode looking for a crime. Immediately ordered him to remove his hands from his pockets. This is where the problem did arise for Deputy Wolf as explicitly stated on camera that the journalist was not detained and was entirely free to leave. Under standard Fourth Amendment precedent, law enforcement cannot issue mandatory, enforceable commands during a voluntary conversation without reasonable, articulable suspicion of an actual crime. Thus his request to remove his hands from his pockets was quickly denied. ​ Rather than backing down, the journalist pushed back aggressively, reminding the deputy that public servants do not possess unilateral authority over free citizens. When Deputy Wolf closed the distance, the auditor issued a sharp warning, declaring that an aggressive approach without legal cause constituted an assault, stating point-blank: "Do it again and I will drop your ass... This is Washington, I have the right to defend myself." You could see the look on the deputies face as his ego crumbled to the floor as he has never had anyone address him in this fashion before. The moment secondary units from the Cowlitz County Sheriff’s Office (including Deputy Kaplan) and the Longview Police Department arrived on scene, Deputy Wolf moved in and placed the journalist in handcuffs because he still had his hands in his pockets. This was despite journalist loudly voicing non-consent to any searches or seizures, a quick weapons pat-down was conducted over his outer clothing. Finding nothing, Deputy Wolf uncuffed him almost immediately as they found nothing and he realized he screwed up, this was an illegal detainment and violation of his 4th amendment rights. The walk of shame because almost a sprint as each one of the officers took off immediately from the scene of the crime they committed. The journalist was all over them the whole way calling them out for their actions. ​This is what standing up for your rights looks like. Never give them an inch because they will take a mile.

Giggling Gannon

671,244 просмотров • 14 дней назад

Regional Manager for DMV needs to stay in her lane as she loses it over being on camera. ​When public servants are confronted with the very Constitution they are sworn to uphold, the response shouldn't be ignorance and evasion. Yet, that is exactly what unfolded at the West Virginia Division of Motor Vehicles regional office in Charles Town, located in Jefferson County. ​An independent journalist exercising their protected First Amendment right to film in a public government facility is immediately met with hostility, unlawful demands, and a complete lack of basic legal comprehension by the staff on duty. ​The incident quickly escalated when the facility's Regional Manager, identified as Lorraine Thompson Vangosen, and the on-duty security guard approached the journalist. Rather than conducting themselves with the professionalism expected of public employees, both individuals displayed a stunning lack of understanding regarding constitutional law and citizen rights: ​ Lorraine and the security guard aggressively asserted that filming inside the DMV was strictly prohibited, demanding that the journalist delete the recorded footage. ​Staff attempted to claim that because other citizens' faces were on camera, it created an expectation of privacy that violated public service policies. In a public government building, there is no reasonable expectation of privacy in open, publicly accessible common areas. When the journalist attempted to calmly de-escalate the situation and explain the legal precedent protecting the filming of public officials in public spaces, both Lorraine and the guard refused to listen, doubling down on their unconstitutional directives. ​The true nature of their "authority" was exposed the moment law enforcement arrived. After a responding deputy informed both Lorraine and the security guard that the journalist was entirely within their legal rights to record in the public areas of the building, the dynamic completely changed. ​Rather than issuing an apology or acknowledging their error, both the manager and the guard chose to retreat. For the remainder of the encounter, both individuals stayed completely out of sight, hiding in the back offices until the journalist finally left the premises. ​This encounter isn't an isolated misunderstanding—it highlights a systemic issue with how government employees interact with the public. ​When public officials choose to hide instead of acknowledging the law, it proves that accountability is sorely needed.

Giggling Ganon

20,964 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад

Officer gets upset at man that knows his rights so he packs up his toys and goes to sit in his squad car until another officer gets him to come out and finish the traffic stop. ​The driver, identified as Mr. Brewer, is pulled over for a standard nighttime headlight violation. He complies fully with the initial lawful demands—handing over his driver's license and proof of insurance. But once the officer has the necessary paperwork to write a fix-it ticket or a standard citation, the questions start drifting into unlawful territory. ​After processing the license, the officer asks Mr. Brewer for his phone number, followed by a request for his Social Security number. ​Mr. Brewer correctly draws the line here. While law enforcement can ask for voluntary information, they cannot legally compel a driver to hand over a Social Security number or phone number during a routine traffic infraction. Mr. Brewer stands his ground, stating clearly: "I've given you everything I'm legally required to give you." ​The core battle of this stop happens when a backup officer arrives on scene. The original officer had demanded identification from Mr. Brewer’s wife, who was sitting quietly in the passenger seat. The second officer attempts to back his partner up by claiming that because Alabama is a "Stop and Identify" state, they have the right to demand her ID. ​This is a massive and common misconception among law enforcement, and Mr. Brewer shuts it down perfectly: ​The reason for the stop is a headlights violation. The scope of the officer's traffic investigation stops at the driver. ​ Under Fourth Amendment precedent, a passenger in a vehicle is not the operator and cannot be forced to identify themselves unless officers have reasonable, articulable suspicion that the passenger specifically has committed, is committing, or is about to commit a crime. Simply riding in a car with a headlight violation does not strip you of your right to privacy. ​Knowing that Mr. Brewer knows the law, is well-aware that refusing to sign a ticket can result in an arrest, but that signing it means the stop is legally concluded, the officers realize they have zero leverage. With the citation signed and no legal grounds to prolong the detention or force the passenger to comply, the officers back down and send them on their way. ​Knowing your rights isn't about being difficult—it's about keeping the system accountable.

Giggling Ganon

39,430 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад

Police and sheriff department violate rights of journalist end up costing the city $9500 dollars in a settlement. ​A journalist entered the Silverthorne Post Office to peacefully film public-access areas like the lobby and bulletin boards. Objecting to the camera, postal employees called local law enforcement to remove him. ​When officers from the Silverthorne Police Department and a Summit County Sheriff’s deputy arrived, they attempted to trespass the journalist at the request of the local postmaster. ​The fundamental breakdown in this interaction stems from a misunderstanding of public property rules. Under federal regulation 39 CFR § 232.1 (colloquially known as USPS Poster 7), citizens have an explicit right to take photographs and record video for news purposes in public spaces—such as lobbies, foyers, and corridors—provided they do not disrupt postal operations. ​While the journalist correctly argued his rights on federal property, local officers mistakenly attempted to treat the federal building like private property, enforcing a trespass order based on the staff’s "feelings" rather than an actual violation of law. ​The journalist didn't let the violation of his civil liberties slide. Following the encounter, he pursued legal action against the municipality for violating his First Amendment rights. ​Rather than dragging the case through a lengthy, expensive federal civil rights lawsuit, the Town of Silverthorne ultimately agreed to a $9,500 economic settlement with the journalist. While the town did not formally admit liability, Silverthorne's Police Chief later acknowledged that his officers would handle the situation completely differently given a second chance. ​I can't stress enough how important it is to understand your rights and how vital that it is that we stand up for those rights when confronted by tyrants like these officers try to step on those rights.

Giggling Ganon

13,349 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад

🚨BREAKING: A U.S. citizen in, Vancouver, WA, was pulled over by FIVE police cars for legally observing and documenting ICE agents… then had to explain the Constitution to the officers detaining him… And it was all caught on video. In the video, an ICE agent didn’t like being watched, called local police… Then suddenly, the U.S. citizen, exercising his constitutional rights, was surrounded by FIVE cop cars. And most ridiculous part? The officers who claimed “reasonable suspicion” for detaining the U.S. citizen, could not even answer this simple question… Is it legal to observe and record law enforcement? After refusing to answer, and arguing about the First Amendment for several minutes, the officer finally admitted… Yes. It is legal to observe and record law enforcement. So, if it’s a legally protected activity… then why was this U.S. citizen detained? Federal courts, across the country, have repeatedly recognized that the First Amendment protects the right to record and observe government officials… including law enforcement performing their duties in public… as long as you aren’t interfering with them. That means, local police, and ICE agents, don’t get to decide when that right applies… They don’t get to ignore the Constitution because they’re uncomfortable with public oversight. But this isn’t the only incident. Across America, we’re watching local law enforcement work alongside ICE, while ordinary citizens, journalists, and legal observers are being questioned, detained, and intimidated for exercising their constitutional rights. And the fact that a U.S. citizen had to educate the officers, who were detaining HIM, about the Constitution… should outrage every single person. Because if the people enforcing the law don’t understand the constitutional rights they’re sworn to protect… That puts every American in danger.

Jesus Freakin Congress

103,571 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад