Loading video...
Video Failed to Load
oh wow this is a naaaaasty read 😭
335,769 views • 1 year ago •via X (Twitter)
11 Comments

let me remind y’all katycats that the point of these two examples is NOT to criticise her for being a bad person, but to show how her acts outside of her music career generally contradict her music’s brand of positivity, which hence shows how inauthentic it is

fine she may not have done anything illegal, but why is a singer who preaches empowerment going after frail elderly people? there is an obvious power imbalance. why would you INSIST on buying the nun’s house when they agreed to sell it to someone else and told her to go away?

whoa thats crazy but have you heard this?

The way I didn’t know that Katy Perry killing a nun was actually real omg???

Taking 90years old woman to court pf this shit?? Shes acc disgusting wtf

the proposed ‘act’ never even made it through legislation. Katy Perry did nothing illegal my condolences to the homophobic nun though 🙏🏽

The way both of these cases are just full of misinformation! Its just bullying ! those old bullys have nothing on katy! The way none of them won the court cases and lost the cases is so funny! Law is justice !thats why swiftologist is a bully and an illiterate person not some LAWER bcz that requires studying!

so shes not a good person, not a good artist, not a good dancer… whats left 😖

I’m on Katy side for the nuns. It’s discrimination against Perry not to sell it to her

The nuns already agreed to sell it to someone else

The nuns literally didn’t have ownership of the convent. They were living there for free.
