Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

There was a problem loading this video. This could be due to a temporary network issue or the video might be unavailable.

ok but why does Ghostface randomly have magic tho?? It kinda looks like Tanya's purple dust, Mileena's ball roll, then Scorpion's fire kick 🧐

Melon 🍉

2,763 subscribers

581,020 views • 1 year ago •via X (Twitter)

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

Looks like defender checked him (watch him legit thrust into him) then queen briefly lost ball, regained it, and took two steps. Kinda iffy but they let the boys play.

Looks like defender checked him (watch him legit thrust into him) then queen briefly lost ball, regained it, and took two steps. Kinda iffy but they let the boys play.

Spencer Schultz

1,221,164 views • 1 year ago

🐣ur hairs kinda a mess… 👑raise ur hand if u have any complaints about my looks. 🐰u look like a pool ball 👑ur in for it now… (to cameraman) sorry can u stop rolling for a second? WHY IS IT ALWAYS HARUA LMFAOO LET YUDAI GET UP 😭😭😭

🐣ur hairs kinda a mess… 👑raise ur hand if u have any complaints about my looks. 🐰u look like a pool ball 👑ur in for it now… (to cameraman) sorry can u stop rolling for a second? WHY IS IT ALWAYS HARUA LMFAOO LET YUDAI GET UP 😭😭😭

leena (≧◡≦)

33,247 views • 2 months ago

🚨 THIS IS HOW IT STARTS — HUMANOID ROBOT SUDDENLY LUNGES AT A MAN — EXACTLY THE MOMENT PEOPLE FEARED A humanoid robot was casually kicking a soccer ball around during a public demonstration. Then the ball rolled toward a man in the audience. He tried to kick it back. That’s when the robot suddenly charged toward him and raised its arm like it was about to swing. Within seconds, a handler rushed in and grabbed the robot before the moment escalated. People in the room laugh nervously… but the clip is making the rounds online for one reason: The movement looks almost human. The way it runs. The stance. The arm coming up. Even the comments are losing it: • “Tf was it going to HIT for???” • “Why did it need to be held back?” • “DON’T TOUCH MY BALL” • “How do they get pissed off if they supposedly don’t have emotions?” The strangest part? The robot seemed to react the instant the human interfered with the ball. Are we just watching a glitch during a demo… or the exact moment people warned about?

🚨 THIS IS HOW IT STARTS — HUMANOID ROBOT SUDDENLY LUNGES AT A MAN — EXACTLY THE MOMENT PEOPLE FEARED A humanoid robot was casually kicking a soccer ball around during a public demonstration. Then the ball rolled toward a man in the audience. He tried to kick it back. That’s when the robot suddenly charged toward him and raised its arm like it was about to swing. Within seconds, a handler rushed in and grabbed the robot before the moment escalated. People in the room laugh nervously… but the clip is making the rounds online for one reason: The movement looks almost human. The way it runs. The stance. The arm coming up. Even the comments are losing it: • “Tf was it going to HIT for???” • “Why did it need to be held back?” • “DON’T TOUCH MY BALL” • “How do they get pissed off if they supposedly don’t have emotions?” The strangest part? The robot seemed to react the instant the human interfered with the ball. Are we just watching a glitch during a demo… or the exact moment people warned about?

HustleBitch

54,191 views • 4 months ago

“Crazy regimes like Iran hell bent on prophetic Islamic delusions, cannot have nuclear weapons. It’s common sense” What about crazy regimes that are not Islamic? Like North Korea, or Russia. These countries are no better than Iran. They are all bad. Why is it OK to the US to kill then Supreme Leader of Iran but wrong for me or anyone else to post on X that the U.S. should take out Putin? Why is there a difference because one is Islamic?

“Crazy regimes like Iran hell bent on prophetic Islamic delusions, cannot have nuclear weapons. It’s common sense” What about crazy regimes that are not Islamic? Like North Korea, or Russia. These countries are no better than Iran. They are all bad. Why is it OK to the US to kill then Supreme Leader of Iran but wrong for me or anyone else to post on X that the U.S. should take out Putin? Why is there a difference because one is Islamic?

Ed Krassenstein

122,260 views • 5 months ago

I am not trying to be funny, but most people did not know this was a man in this video! Once being told that it was a man, the majority of black women were still saying how beautiful his face was! Truthfully bro looks like an above above average black woman and they were agreeing talking about HIS facecard will never be declined! So if most Transgay men wear wigs, heavy make up, bbls, fake breast, and have exaggerated voices & movements to look like women, why are black women mimicking them then? Why are they doing the same things? It is sad that as a black man, we have to chose from black women, most of whom look and act just like black men pretending to be women!

I am not trying to be funny, but most people did not know this was a man in this video! Once being told that it was a man, the majority of black women were still saying how beautiful his face was! Truthfully bro looks like an above above average black woman and they were agreeing talking about HIS facecard will never be declined! So if most Transgay men wear wigs, heavy make up, bbls, fake breast, and have exaggerated voices & movements to look like women, why are black women mimicking them then? Why are they doing the same things? It is sad that as a black man, we have to chose from black women, most of whom look and act just like black men pretending to be women!

Tommy 'Tj' Sotomayor

29,438 views • 1 year ago

Enjoy this journey while you can. There will be a day when you don’t have anyone to throw with or lift with or play pickup racquetball and then hit the sauna after with. There will be a day when you can’t immediately roll from your workout into breakfast/lunch/dinner with 8 of your best friends. There will be a day when disputes cannot be settled with a game of madden, 2K or the show. You will realize that showing up late for work pales in comparison to the fear you had about showing up late to the field or the weight room. You can say that you’ll still train hard, keep yourself in shape, hold YOURSELF accountable. It’s easy to say when you have a goal you’re working towards with a collective group. But when you don’t have that, damn it gets hard. So enjoy it. Take advantage of the time and the energy. For some guys it happens after 6 years of pro ball. For others it happens after 4 years of college. But it will leave you. Let me repeat that: IT WILL LEAVE YOU AND IT SUCKS WHEN IT DOES.

Enjoy this journey while you can. There will be a day when you don’t have anyone to throw with or lift with or play pickup racquetball and then hit the sauna after with. There will be a day when you can’t immediately roll from your workout into breakfast/lunch/dinner with 8 of your best friends. There will be a day when disputes cannot be settled with a game of madden, 2K or the show. You will realize that showing up late for work pales in comparison to the fear you had about showing up late to the field or the weight room. You can say that you’ll still train hard, keep yourself in shape, hold YOURSELF accountable. It’s easy to say when you have a goal you’re working towards with a collective group. But when you don’t have that, damn it gets hard. So enjoy it. Take advantage of the time and the energy. For some guys it happens after 6 years of pro ball. For others it happens after 4 years of college. But it will leave you. Let me repeat that: IT WILL LEAVE YOU AND IT SUCKS WHEN IT DOES.

Jack Barry

63,098 views • 1 year ago

A cat walked by my house last night and immediately came in looking for food and water. It was thin, dirty but very friendly. My first thought, this has to be a house cat who lost its way. Then I saw it's ears, and hold up, this looks like a purebred cat. So I brought it to the vet to confirm, maybe it had a loving owner who put in a microchip, maybe it was already spayed/neutered. Unfortunately, the vet confirmed it's a female, less than 2 years old but already had babies. And it is an American curl. Most likely, a backyard breeder used her as a kitten mill, then threw her out when there was a problem? This is the heartbreaking reality of the irresponsible practices of backyard breeders. And why we have so many strays without homes. STOP SUPPORTING BACKYARD BREEDERS!!! ADOPT DON'T SHOP!!! By naddinky

A cat walked by my house last night and immediately came in looking for food and water. It was thin, dirty but very friendly. My first thought, this has to be a house cat who lost its way. Then I saw it's ears, and hold up, this looks like a purebred cat. So I brought it to the vet to confirm, maybe it had a loving owner who put in a microchip, maybe it was already spayed/neutered. Unfortunately, the vet confirmed it's a female, less than 2 years old but already had babies. And it is an American curl. Most likely, a backyard breeder used her as a kitten mill, then threw her out when there was a problem? This is the heartbreaking reality of the irresponsible practices of backyard breeders. And why we have so many strays without homes. STOP SUPPORTING BACKYARD BREEDERS!!! ADOPT DON'T SHOP!!! By naddinky

The Husky

133,327 views • 5 months ago

The Cybertruck is hands down the best Tesla I’ve ever owned. I’ve taken it on tens of thousands of miles on road trips, through cities, mountains, deserts, forests, and now another camping trip. The front is covered in bugs, it’s dusty, dirty, and looks like it just came back from an adventure… and honestly, to me, that’s when it looks its best. What I love most is how little I have to think about it. No oil changes. No engine maintenance. No transmission to worry about. I just charge it, rotate the tires when needed, wash it whenever I feel like it, and keep driving. Right now I’m sitting at a campsite, looking over at it, and I can’t help but smile. And every time I see it, I’m reminded why I bought it. It’s tough, insanely capable, and unlike anything else on the road. Whether it’s hauling gear, camping in remote places, or eating up highway miles with FSD, it just does everything I ask of it. No questions asked. People can debate the design all they want, hate on Elon, etc, but once you actually live with a Cybertruck, it’s hard to imagine going back to anything else. Zero regrets. I’d buy it all over again.

The Cybertruck is hands down the best Tesla I’ve ever owned. I’ve taken it on tens of thousands of miles on road trips, through cities, mountains, deserts, forests, and now another camping trip. The front is covered in bugs, it’s dusty, dirty, and looks like it just came back from an adventure… and honestly, to me, that’s when it looks its best. What I love most is how little I have to think about it. No oil changes. No engine maintenance. No transmission to worry about. I just charge it, rotate the tires when needed, wash it whenever I feel like it, and keep driving. Right now I’m sitting at a campsite, looking over at it, and I can’t help but smile. And every time I see it, I’m reminded why I bought it. It’s tough, insanely capable, and unlike anything else on the road. Whether it’s hauling gear, camping in remote places, or eating up highway miles with FSD, it just does everything I ask of it. No questions asked. People can debate the design all they want, hate on Elon, etc, but once you actually live with a Cybertruck, it’s hard to imagine going back to anything else. Zero regrets. I’d buy it all over again.

Teslaconomics

16,283 views • 7 days ago

This is what I’m talking about. This isn’t to highlight Bentancur. It’s how 90% of teams and players behave for I’d say 70% of the game. But what are we trying to achieve here? The best thing that can happen from any phase of play, is to score a goal. So that’s the overall objective. To do that, the ball at some stage has to go behind every single opposition player and space has to be exploited whether it’s big or small. But Bentancur here is waiting. Waiting for players to move. Waiting for opposition to move. But why would Newcastle move? They don’t need to break from their shape. But imagine what would happen if Bentancur travelled with the ball into those open spaces. Newcastle and spurs players aren’t just going to watch, it’s going to instigate a chain reaction of movement from both sides. And that will in turn break up shapes which creates gaps. Then it’s if you are confident and able to exploit. But just waiting doesn’t achieve it. Imagine the disruption you will cause if both the ball player, and off ball players look to provoke the opposition as opposed to rigidly stand in shape. It’s just logical. If you stay still. Why does the opposition need to move? So what pictures are changing? What gaps are you opening? What gaps are you exploiting? So how do you expect to score when to score a goal, gaps have to be exploited? It’s why when people say “it’s harder in modern football, there’s less space”. No there isn’t. There’s always space. You’re just seeing players less willing to provoke it and attack it.

This is what I’m talking about. This isn’t to highlight Bentancur. It’s how 90% of teams and players behave for I’d say 70% of the game. But what are we trying to achieve here? The best thing that can happen from any phase of play, is to score a goal. So that’s the overall objective. To do that, the ball at some stage has to go behind every single opposition player and space has to be exploited whether it’s big or small. But Bentancur here is waiting. Waiting for players to move. Waiting for opposition to move. But why would Newcastle move? They don’t need to break from their shape. But imagine what would happen if Bentancur travelled with the ball into those open spaces. Newcastle and spurs players aren’t just going to watch, it’s going to instigate a chain reaction of movement from both sides. And that will in turn break up shapes which creates gaps. Then it’s if you are confident and able to exploit. But just waiting doesn’t achieve it. Imagine the disruption you will cause if both the ball player, and off ball players look to provoke the opposition as opposed to rigidly stand in shape. It’s just logical. If you stay still. Why does the opposition need to move? So what pictures are changing? What gaps are you opening? What gaps are you exploiting? So how do you expect to score when to score a goal, gaps have to be exploited? It’s why when people say “it’s harder in modern football, there’s less space”. No there isn’t. There’s always space. You’re just seeing players less willing to provoke it and attack it.

Harry Brooks

14,215 views • 8 months ago

ok wait WAIT… hear me out for a sec bc this might actually make sense 🤭🤭🤭 so in this clip where pond gives something to phuwin… what if that was the car key. like actually. bc pond already looked kinda drunk there so it would make sense for him to be like “yeah u drive” AND THEN at the end of songkran: pond = alone on the side of the road on his phone phuwin = on the other side walking fast with fot like hello???? what if phuwin already went with fot to go get the car and pond was just standing there waiting for them to come pick him up 😭😭😭 bc why were they separated like that AND pond just standing there like that… it’s giving “my ride is on the way” idk but this is lining up a little too well like… u know what. yeah. this is facts actually i’m not even being delulu anymore this just makes sense. i was the drop of water on pond’s shoulder btw i saw everything!!! 🤡🤡🤡

ok wait WAIT… hear me out for a sec bc this might actually make sense 🤭🤭🤭 so in this clip where pond gives something to phuwin… what if that was the car key. like actually. bc pond already looked kinda drunk there so it would make sense for him to be like “yeah u drive” AND THEN at the end of songkran: pond = alone on the side of the road on his phone phuwin = on the other side walking fast with fot like hello???? what if phuwin already went with fot to go get the car and pond was just standing there waiting for them to come pick him up 😭😭😭 bc why were they separated like that AND pond just standing there like that… it’s giving “my ride is on the way” idk but this is lining up a little too well like… u know what. yeah. this is facts actually i’m not even being delulu anymore this just makes sense. i was the drop of water on pond’s shoulder btw i saw everything!!! 🤡🤡🤡

Tiny เทนี่ 🌱 || PHUWIN LERTRATKOSUM era

67,342 views • 3 months ago

🚨 SCIENTISTS JUST WATCHED ATOMS DO SOMETHING THAT LOOKS IMPOSSIBLE Researchers have directly observed atoms inside a crystal transferring angular momentum and then reversing their direction of rotation. Like microscopic Ferris wheels suddenly spinning the opposite way. Using ultra-powerful terahertz laser pulses, physicists tracked atoms moving in precise circular paths inside a quantum material. But during the transfer process, something bizarre happened: The rotational direction flipped. Physicists describe the effect almost like: 1 + 1 = −1 The reversal comes from the hidden symmetry of the crystal itself a quantum effect never directly observed before. Why this matters: • It reveals new foundations of magnetism • It could help scientists control quantum materials • It may lead to ultrafast future memory devices • It exposes deeper rules governing matter itself The strangest part? The atoms weren’t breaking physics. They were obeying an even deeper layer of it. We are starting to see the hidden mechanics underneath reality. Follow for more future physics and quantum breakthroughs.

🚨 SCIENTISTS JUST WATCHED ATOMS DO SOMETHING THAT LOOKS IMPOSSIBLE Researchers have directly observed atoms inside a crystal transferring angular momentum and then reversing their direction of rotation. Like microscopic Ferris wheels suddenly spinning the opposite way. Using ultra-powerful terahertz laser pulses, physicists tracked atoms moving in precise circular paths inside a quantum material. But during the transfer process, something bizarre happened: The rotational direction flipped. Physicists describe the effect almost like: 1 + 1 = −1 The reversal comes from the hidden symmetry of the crystal itself a quantum effect never directly observed before. Why this matters: • It reveals new foundations of magnetism • It could help scientists control quantum materials • It may lead to ultrafast future memory devices • It exposes deeper rules governing matter itself The strangest part? The atoms weren’t breaking physics. They were obeying an even deeper layer of it. We are starting to see the hidden mechanics underneath reality. Follow for more future physics and quantum breakthroughs.

TheNewPhysics

26,543 views • 3 months ago

Lewis Hamilton, when asked about Kimi Antonelli: "I think he's young but delivering and doing an amazing job. Super consistent, not making mistakes. There's no reason to think that won't continue." [Question: Just thinking about the dynamic of you and Kimi being 1 & 2 in the championship, Lewis. I'm wondering if it gets close down the street you know what it's like to be a young driver in your first or second season going for the title and the pressures that are there. Do you think that might be an extra little thing he's got across does it sort of help your prospects that he's in that situation?] Lewis said "I mean, I don't see why I would have to assume that." Then added his compliments about Kimi. F1 2026 || Hungary

Lewis Hamilton, when asked about Kimi Antonelli: "I think he's young but delivering and doing an amazing job. Super consistent, not making mistakes. There's no reason to think that won't continue." [Question: Just thinking about the dynamic of you and Kimi being 1 & 2 in the championship, Lewis. I'm wondering if it gets close down the street you know what it's like to be a young driver in your first or second season going for the title and the pressures that are there. Do you think that might be an extra little thing he's got across does it sort of help your prospects that he's in that situation?] Lewis said "I mean, I don't see why I would have to assume that." Then added his compliments about Kimi. F1 2026 || Hungary

sim

52,368 views • 20 days ago

So I’ve had a minute to think about this ego driven vanity clip #MeghanMarkle dropped for #asever and I have questions. •this seems like a rebrand. Why are there no new products? These are the same products since launch. Same packaging. She has not added anything new besides limited edition crap. •why does it feel like a low rent fashion reel? She wears no less than 8 outfits worth over $100,000, never MIND the jewelry. What is “as ever” about this? She picks up a few jars of as ever spread-BFD, it could be any brand. There’s nothing about this that makes you connect to the brand. •the acting is horrid. She looks so pretentious and awkward-she REALLY should have hired another person to be the face of the brand but we all know her ego would have never allowed that. Markle was a bad actor then and is still a bad actor. •is she selling clothing? Jewelry? It’s just so disjointed and Markle heavy that the focus is on her, not the brand. Brands do rebrands when they want to target a new audience, launch new product, recover from a PR crisis, or to stay fresh and relevant. This is not accomplishing those things-it’s weird and just an excuse for Markle to be on camera in a bunch of designer clothes she can now write off as a business expenses. I see you, girl. #MeghanIsTheProblem #MeghanMarkleIsAGrifter

Princess CarParkle 👑

71,513 views • 2 months ago

A friend of mine just recently got his first gun, a striker fired Glock 19. He is terrified to leave a round chambered. To anyone reading this who has this same fear, I want to alleviate your concerns. I'm going to explain why there is nothing to be afraid of. First and foremost, I fully understand your concern. It's not irrational. And you're not stupid for being nervous about a bullet being aimed at your leg with the striker cocked back under spring tension about an 1/8 of an inch from the primer. I get it. I shared this concern when I was new to carrying. But your fear is due to a lack of understanding of the internal safety features of a modern striker fired handgun. On a properly maintained modern striker fired pistol the striker CANNOT hit the primer on the chambered round without the trigger being pulled. Can't. Not shouldn't. Can't. (If you have any good Sig P320 jokes, this is the proper place to share them) There is a block that the striker will hit and stop if it is released without the trigger being depressed. It works just like a lock and key. There is a channel in the blocker that the striker can pass through if it is in the fire position. It only goes into the fire position if the trigger is pulled which pushes the blocker into the fire position. A spring keeps the blocker firmly in the block position until then. The blocker is a solid piece of steel that won't break. And if your gun is securely in a hard sided Kydex holster nothing can move the trigger unless it is unholstered. Many guns like Glocks have a trigger safety that prevents the trigger from moving due to force of dropping. Your finger has to be on the trigger safety to move it. So the gun cannot fire unless you pull the trigger. And it's easy for you to test this safety feature to see how it works! See the video below. You can try to push the striker forward by moving that piece at the back of the slide forward. That piece is the back of the striker. Push it forward and it will stop. The tip won't come out through the breach. You see it trying to come through but it gets stuck. Now push that little button in. That is the actual blocker. When you push it in you will now be able to move the striker forward through the breach and see how it will strike the primer. You can test this easily every time you disassemble your pistol to verify it is still working. You can break this safety feature by removing the blocker or losing the spring. But if it's there it will work. (You would be the first person in firearms history who has ever lost a spring. Literally the first one. It has never happened before. 😐) But it doesn't come out as part of regular maintenance. You have to disassemble the firing assembly to get it out. That won't happen by accident. And if you do that on purpose you should do this blocker test when you reassemble it to make sure the safety feature is working. My video shows a Glock slide. All Glocks will look like this. Other brands may put the blocker in a different spot or it may be a slightly different shape. But they all (mostly) have the same design. If you test yours as demonstrated and it works like mine does, your gun WILL NOT fire without pulling the trigger. (If you just thought of another P320 joke, this is another good place to toss that out there)

A friend of mine just recently got his first gun, a striker fired Glock 19. He is terrified to leave a round chambered. To anyone reading this who has this same fear, I want to alleviate your concerns. I'm going to explain why there is nothing to be afraid of. First and foremost, I fully understand your concern. It's not irrational. And you're not stupid for being nervous about a bullet being aimed at your leg with the striker cocked back under spring tension about an 1/8 of an inch from the primer. I get it. I shared this concern when I was new to carrying. But your fear is due to a lack of understanding of the internal safety features of a modern striker fired handgun. On a properly maintained modern striker fired pistol the striker CANNOT hit the primer on the chambered round without the trigger being pulled. Can't. Not shouldn't. Can't. (If you have any good Sig P320 jokes, this is the proper place to share them) There is a block that the striker will hit and stop if it is released without the trigger being depressed. It works just like a lock and key. There is a channel in the blocker that the striker can pass through if it is in the fire position. It only goes into the fire position if the trigger is pulled which pushes the blocker into the fire position. A spring keeps the blocker firmly in the block position until then. The blocker is a solid piece of steel that won't break. And if your gun is securely in a hard sided Kydex holster nothing can move the trigger unless it is unholstered. Many guns like Glocks have a trigger safety that prevents the trigger from moving due to force of dropping. Your finger has to be on the trigger safety to move it. So the gun cannot fire unless you pull the trigger. And it's easy for you to test this safety feature to see how it works! See the video below. You can try to push the striker forward by moving that piece at the back of the slide forward. That piece is the back of the striker. Push it forward and it will stop. The tip won't come out through the breach. You see it trying to come through but it gets stuck. Now push that little button in. That is the actual blocker. When you push it in you will now be able to move the striker forward through the breach and see how it will strike the primer. You can test this easily every time you disassemble your pistol to verify it is still working. You can break this safety feature by removing the blocker or losing the spring. But if it's there it will work. (You would be the first person in firearms history who has ever lost a spring. Literally the first one. It has never happened before. 😐) But it doesn't come out as part of regular maintenance. You have to disassemble the firing assembly to get it out. That won't happen by accident. And if you do that on purpose you should do this blocker test when you reassemble it to make sure the safety feature is working. My video shows a Glock slide. All Glocks will look like this. Other brands may put the blocker in a different spot or it may be a slightly different shape. But they all (mostly) have the same design. If you test yours as demonstrated and it works like mine does, your gun WILL NOT fire without pulling the trigger. (If you just thought of another P320 joke, this is another good place to toss that out there)

Spaceballs The X Account

186,036 views • 1 day ago

As a graphics engine coder I think when you look at a flickering bug like this one in the video below it’s not immediately obvious what is going on. The key here is observation - to study this flickering/bugged render carefully - what do we see? Firstly for me it was very obvious that nearly all of the scene shadows were flashing on and off - but (but!) there was a secondary issue where some buildings and parts of the sky were also flashing purple. Hmmmm. Interesting. I initially thought then this might be two separate bugs - but because the sky purple element could only based on full screen post fx and not 3D rendering I looked at this first with a few GPU captures to step through all our post processing to find the rendering stage which made these pixels turn purple: When I did this I found the colour 3D texture LUT grading that makes our different biomes have unique colour palettes was going very wrong - colours near 0 or 1 were wrapping and making the purple elements that we see in the said sky and base parts. The only way this could happen was if the texture was corrupt (which it was not) or if the 3D texture sampling was wrapping and not clamped as intended. That was the Eureka moment - because if the post fx had the wrong texture sampler then the disappearing shadows which also require an exact texture sampler for comparing depth might be also wrong because of the same kind of texture sampling issue! So with this idea that the engine was using the wrong texture samplers, but only in very high draw call scenes like the big base here I the looked at some engine limits and found the bug very quickly - a circular dx12 descriptor buffer for samplers running out over multiple frames, reusing the wrong data for new scenes inflight. Hence the flickering, as the GPU randomly got wrong samplers for some post textures or shadow depth. Easy to fix with triple limits for future expansion and also adding an assert/debug spam in case this limit is ever reached again - QA testers would see this message and report if they ever saw a flicker with this style of bug. My bug and my bad from 2017 porting NMS to DX12 without foreseeing how massively complex bases and our game would grow.

As a graphics engine coder I think when you look at a flickering bug like this one in the video below it’s not immediately obvious what is going on. The key here is observation - to study this flickering/bugged render carefully - what do we see? Firstly for me it was very obvious that nearly all of the scene shadows were flashing on and off - but (but!) there was a secondary issue where some buildings and parts of the sky were also flashing purple. Hmmmm. Interesting. I initially thought then this might be two separate bugs - but because the sky purple element could only based on full screen post fx and not 3D rendering I looked at this first with a few GPU captures to step through all our post processing to find the rendering stage which made these pixels turn purple: When I did this I found the colour 3D texture LUT grading that makes our different biomes have unique colour palettes was going very wrong - colours near 0 or 1 were wrapping and making the purple elements that we see in the said sky and base parts. The only way this could happen was if the texture was corrupt (which it was not) or if the 3D texture sampling was wrapping and not clamped as intended. That was the Eureka moment - because if the post fx had the wrong texture sampler then the disappearing shadows which also require an exact texture sampler for comparing depth might be also wrong because of the same kind of texture sampling issue! So with this idea that the engine was using the wrong texture samplers, but only in very high draw call scenes like the big base here I the looked at some engine limits and found the bug very quickly - a circular dx12 descriptor buffer for samplers running out over multiple frames, reusing the wrong data for new scenes inflight. Hence the flickering, as the GPU randomly got wrong samplers for some post textures or shadow depth. Easy to fix with triple limits for future expansion and also adding an assert/debug spam in case this limit is ever reached again - QA testers would see this message and report if they ever saw a flicker with this style of bug. My bug and my bad from 2017 porting NMS to DX12 without foreseeing how massively complex bases and our game would grow.

Martin Griffiths

72,828 views • 1 year ago

The secret to making Agentic Video actually work isn't the agent. I'm sharing what it actually is. Everyone's using the same tools now. Same models. Same agents. Same platforms. So why are some teams producing ads that convert and others producing expensive noise? The agent doesn't decide the quality of the output. The brief does. A lazy brief to an agent produces 50 lazy ads fast. A sharp brief — built on real customer language, real objections, real purchase triggers — produces 50 precision instruments. Here's what a sharp brief looks like before you open Notch Agentic Video: → The customer's exact words when they describe their problem. Not your words. Theirs. → The single objection that's stopping the unconverted customer from buying right now. → The awareness stage you're entering. Cold. Warm. Hot. Each needs a different entry point. → The one emotional outcome they're actually buying. Not the feature. The feeling. Feed that into the agent. It asks you more questions — hook type, actor tone, funnel stage. Then it builds. Voiceover, B-roll, subtitles, music. Fifty variants. One session. Agents didn't make strategy irrelevant. They made it the only thing that matters. Comment "BRIEF" below. I'll send the full framework directly. Try it here -

The secret to making Agentic Video actually work isn't the agent. I'm sharing what it actually is. Everyone's using the same tools now. Same models. Same agents. Same platforms. So why are some teams producing ads that convert and others producing expensive noise? The agent doesn't decide the quality of the output. The brief does. A lazy brief to an agent produces 50 lazy ads fast. A sharp brief — built on real customer language, real objections, real purchase triggers — produces 50 precision instruments. Here's what a sharp brief looks like before you open Notch Agentic Video: → The customer's exact words when they describe their problem. Not your words. Theirs. → The single objection that's stopping the unconverted customer from buying right now. → The awareness stage you're entering. Cold. Warm. Hot. Each needs a different entry point. → The one emotional outcome they're actually buying. Not the feature. The feeling. Feed that into the agent. It asks you more questions — hook type, actor tone, funnel stage. Then it builds. Voiceover, B-roll, subtitles, music. Fifty variants. One session. Agents didn't make strategy irrelevant. They made it the only thing that matters. Comment "BRIEF" below. I'll send the full framework directly. Try it here -

Vinay Jain

29,821 views • 5 months ago

Wanted to chime in on this video and shed some light on what High Performance looks like in game ----- FNS calls Zellsis the most overrated player in Americas. Now to be clear I'm not coming at this butthurt as a friend of Jordan, but rather I don't think people appreciate the magnitude of impact he has on a team and on a series Whether you play ranked or compete at the highest level of this game, your team dynamic is one of the most important aspects of success. You may win without it, and let skill and strategy shine, but it won't be sustainable The things that Jordan does extremely well that need to be highlighted are: - energy - communication - mid-rounding voice - emotional awareness - effort - mental resilience - ability to stay focused when the match matters High Performance is a combination of talent and skills for sure, but more importantly it's: - attitude - behaviours - consistency - mindset - focused attention - awareness of mental intensity - intention to improve - intention to execute As you continue to build your skills in game, be sure to elevate your High Performance skills overall. It starts with awareness, then influence, then consistency! Heck you may even win more and be called overrated, but those you play with will feel your impact! ----- Again, this clip could very well just be bait to stir the pot for hype and content purposes. Respectable, if so! We need more storylines 😈😂 I'd also like to disclose that I have coached Zellsis before and I obviously have bias. I haven't worked with FNS, however I think he's funny, brilliant and would love to connect with him

Wanted to chime in on this video and shed some light on what High Performance looks like in game ----- FNS calls Zellsis the most overrated player in Americas. Now to be clear I'm not coming at this butthurt as a friend of Jordan, but rather I don't think people appreciate the magnitude of impact he has on a team and on a series Whether you play ranked or compete at the highest level of this game, your team dynamic is one of the most important aspects of success. You may win without it, and let skill and strategy shine, but it won't be sustainable The things that Jordan does extremely well that need to be highlighted are: - energy - communication - mid-rounding voice - emotional awareness - effort - mental resilience - ability to stay focused when the match matters High Performance is a combination of talent and skills for sure, but more importantly it's: - attitude - behaviours - consistency - mindset - focused attention - awareness of mental intensity - intention to improve - intention to execute As you continue to build your skills in game, be sure to elevate your High Performance skills overall. It starts with awareness, then influence, then consistency! Heck you may even win more and be called overrated, but those you play with will feel your impact! ----- Again, this clip could very well just be bait to stir the pot for hype and content purposes. Respectable, if so! We need more storylines 😈😂 I'd also like to disclose that I have coached Zellsis before and I obviously have bias. I haven't worked with FNS, however I think he's funny, brilliant and would love to connect with him

Jerrad ‘Coach Kona’ 🇨🇦🇩🇪

183,767 views • 2 years ago

When a spacecraft leaves Earth, it doesn’t just fire its engines and head straight to its destination. In many missions, especially those going beyond low Earth orbit, there’s a more subtle and elegant strategy at play, one that uses gravity itself as part of the navigation system. This is often called a gravity assist, or a slingshot maneuver. But in the case of missions like #Artemis II, what’s being used is a closely related idea known as a free-return trajectory. At first glance, it might sound simple: the spacecraft goes to the Moon, loops around it, and comes back. But the physics behind it is anything but simple. Instead of relying on continuous propulsion, the spacecraft follows a carefully calculated path through the gravitational field of the Earth–Moon system. It is launched with just the right speed and direction so that, as it approaches the Moon, the Moon’s gravity bends its trajectory. The spacecraft is effectively flung around the Moon, redirected onto a path that naturally brings it back toward Earth. No major engine burn is needed for the return. Small trajectory corrections may still be required, but gravity does the heavy lifting. That’s the key. This kind of trajectory is not just efficient, it’s also safe. If something goes wrong with the spacecraft’s engines or onboard systems, gravity itself ensures the return. It’s an inherent backup plan, built into the trajectory from the very beginning. The same fundamental idea appears in gravity assists used across the Solar System. When a spacecraft flies past a planet, it can gain or lose speed by exchanging momentum with that planet. From the spacecraft’s point of view, it’s as if it has been accelerated without using fuel. In reality, it has borrowed a tiny amount of orbital energy from the planet itself. That’s how missions like Voyager reached the outer planets, and how probes continue to explore regions far beyond what their onboard fuel alone would allow. But there’s an important distinction. An interplanetary gravity assist is typically used to change speed and direction, often increasing the spacecraft’s energy. A free-return trajectory, like the one used in Artemis II, is designed for something more specific: a path that naturally loops back to Earth without requiring additional propulsion. It’s less about gaining energy, and more about shaping a trajectory that guarantees a return. To understand why this works, it helps to stop thinking in straight lines. In space, motion follows curves defined by gravity. The spacecraft is constantly falling, first toward Earth, then toward the Moon, and then back toward Earth again. What looks like a loop is really a continuous free fall through a changing gravitational landscape. This way of navigating space reveals something deeper. We tend to think of engines as the drivers of motion, but once a spacecraft is on its way, gravity does most of the work. The art of spaceflight is not just about thrust. It’s about knowing when not to use it. #GoodLuck #Artemis NASA Artemis

When a spacecraft leaves Earth, it doesn’t just fire its engines and head straight to its destination. In many missions, especially those going beyond low Earth orbit, there’s a more subtle and elegant strategy at play, one that uses gravity itself as part of the navigation system. This is often called a gravity assist, or a slingshot maneuver. But in the case of missions like #Artemis II, what’s being used is a closely related idea known as a free-return trajectory. At first glance, it might sound simple: the spacecraft goes to the Moon, loops around it, and comes back. But the physics behind it is anything but simple. Instead of relying on continuous propulsion, the spacecraft follows a carefully calculated path through the gravitational field of the Earth–Moon system. It is launched with just the right speed and direction so that, as it approaches the Moon, the Moon’s gravity bends its trajectory. The spacecraft is effectively flung around the Moon, redirected onto a path that naturally brings it back toward Earth. No major engine burn is needed for the return. Small trajectory corrections may still be required, but gravity does the heavy lifting. That’s the key. This kind of trajectory is not just efficient, it’s also safe. If something goes wrong with the spacecraft’s engines or onboard systems, gravity itself ensures the return. It’s an inherent backup plan, built into the trajectory from the very beginning. The same fundamental idea appears in gravity assists used across the Solar System. When a spacecraft flies past a planet, it can gain or lose speed by exchanging momentum with that planet. From the spacecraft’s point of view, it’s as if it has been accelerated without using fuel. In reality, it has borrowed a tiny amount of orbital energy from the planet itself. That’s how missions like Voyager reached the outer planets, and how probes continue to explore regions far beyond what their onboard fuel alone would allow. But there’s an important distinction. An interplanetary gravity assist is typically used to change speed and direction, often increasing the spacecraft’s energy. A free-return trajectory, like the one used in Artemis II, is designed for something more specific: a path that naturally loops back to Earth without requiring additional propulsion. It’s less about gaining energy, and more about shaping a trajectory that guarantees a return. To understand why this works, it helps to stop thinking in straight lines. In space, motion follows curves defined by gravity. The spacecraft is constantly falling, first toward Earth, then toward the Moon, and then back toward Earth again. What looks like a loop is really a continuous free fall through a changing gravitational landscape. This way of navigating space reveals something deeper. We tend to think of engines as the drivers of motion, but once a spacecraft is on its way, gravity does most of the work. The art of spaceflight is not just about thrust. It’s about knowing when not to use it. #GoodLuck #Artemis NASA Artemis

Erika 

234,886 views • 4 months ago

I had the same thought so I've been playing with it in nanochat. E.g. here's 8 agents (4 claude, 4 codex), with 1 GPU each running nanochat experiments (trying to delete logit softcap without regression). The TLDR is that it doesn't work and it's a mess... but it's still very pretty to look at :) I tried a few setups: 8 independent solo researchers, 1 chief scientist giving work to 8 junior researchers, etc. Each research program is a git branch, each scientist forks it into a feature branch, git worktrees for isolation, simple files for comms, skip Docker/VMs for simplicity atm (I find that instructions are enough to prevent interference). Research org runs in tmux window grids of interactive sessions (like Teams) so that it's pretty to look at, see their individual work, and "take over" if needed, i.e. no -p. But ok the reason it doesn't work so far is that the agents' ideas are just pretty bad out of the box, even at highest intelligence. They don't think carefully though experiment design, they run a bit non-sensical variations, they don't create strong baselines and ablate things properly, they don't carefully control for runtime or flops. (just as an example, an agent yesterday "discovered" that increasing the hidden size of the network improves the validation loss, which is a totally spurious result given that a bigger network will have a lower validation loss in the infinite data regime, but then it also trains for a lot longer, it's not clear why I had to come in to point that out). They are very good at implementing any given well-scoped and described idea but they don't creatively generate them. But the goal is that you are now programming an organization (e.g. a "research org") and its individual agents, so the "source code" is the collection of prompts, skills, tools, etc. and processes that make it up. E.g. a daily standup in the morning is now part of the "org code". And optimizing nanochat pretraining is just one of the many tasks (almost like an eval). Then - given an arbitrary task, how quickly does your research org generate progress on it?

I had the same thought so I've been playing with it in nanochat. E.g. here's 8 agents (4 claude, 4 codex), with 1 GPU each running nanochat experiments (trying to delete logit softcap without regression). The TLDR is that it doesn't work and it's a mess... but it's still very pretty to look at :) I tried a few setups: 8 independent solo researchers, 1 chief scientist giving work to 8 junior researchers, etc. Each research program is a git branch, each scientist forks it into a feature branch, git worktrees for isolation, simple files for comms, skip Docker/VMs for simplicity atm (I find that instructions are enough to prevent interference). Research org runs in tmux window grids of interactive sessions (like Teams) so that it's pretty to look at, see their individual work, and "take over" if needed, i.e. no -p. But ok the reason it doesn't work so far is that the agents' ideas are just pretty bad out of the box, even at highest intelligence. They don't think carefully though experiment design, they run a bit non-sensical variations, they don't create strong baselines and ablate things properly, they don't carefully control for runtime or flops. (just as an example, an agent yesterday "discovered" that increasing the hidden size of the network improves the validation loss, which is a totally spurious result given that a bigger network will have a lower validation loss in the infinite data regime, but then it also trains for a lot longer, it's not clear why I had to come in to point that out). They are very good at implementing any given well-scoped and described idea but they don't creatively generate them. But the goal is that you are now programming an organization (e.g. a "research org") and its individual agents, so the "source code" is the collection of prompts, skills, tools, etc. and processes that make it up. E.g. a daily standup in the morning is now part of the "org code". And optimizing nanochat pretraining is just one of the many tasks (almost like an eval). Then - given an arbitrary task, how quickly does your research org generate progress on it?

Andrej Karpathy

1,648,015 views • 5 months ago

I LOVE this! THIS is what Caitlin Clark was doing in college. She elbowed players. She shoved players. She knocked players down. She taunted players. She provoked players. She humiliated players. Her opponents never responded in college…..until Angel Reese did. THEN Caitlin became a victim. Poor innocent little white girl being taunted by big mean black girl. ———————————————— After that, she went into the WNBA, and started trying the same arrogant tactics, and they knocked the CRAP out of her. You can be a Bully, or you can be a VICTIM, but you can’t be BOTH. In this case, she hit a big shot, and jumped in her opponents face yelling, “YOU LIKE THAT??!” THIS is why opponents were fouling Caitlin so hard during her rookie year. THIS is why it appeared at times that opponents were trying to injure Caitlin. ———————————————— It was not jealousy. It was not her endorsements. It was not because she was white. It was not because she was straight. Nope. It was not ANY of that. She provoked her opponents. They gave her what she was asking for…….and she started crying, and her body fell apart. They are going to start hammering her again, but this time, I don’t want any victim tweets. If you dish it out, in ANY sport, you have to be ready for what comes WITH that! This is no different than a baseball player hitting a homerun, and standing at the plate posing as the ball sails over the wall. Then getting hit in the head with a 102 mph fastball in his next at bat.

I LOVE this! THIS is what Caitlin Clark was doing in college. She elbowed players. She shoved players. She knocked players down. She taunted players. She provoked players. She humiliated players. Her opponents never responded in college…..until Angel Reese did. THEN Caitlin became a victim. Poor innocent little white girl being taunted by big mean black girl. ———————————————— After that, she went into the WNBA, and started trying the same arrogant tactics, and they knocked the CRAP out of her. You can be a Bully, or you can be a VICTIM, but you can’t be BOTH. In this case, she hit a big shot, and jumped in her opponents face yelling, “YOU LIKE THAT??!” THIS is why opponents were fouling Caitlin so hard during her rookie year. THIS is why it appeared at times that opponents were trying to injure Caitlin. ———————————————— It was not jealousy. It was not her endorsements. It was not because she was white. It was not because she was straight. Nope. It was not ANY of that. She provoked her opponents. They gave her what she was asking for…….and she started crying, and her body fell apart. They are going to start hammering her again, but this time, I don’t want any victim tweets. If you dish it out, in ANY sport, you have to be ready for what comes WITH that! This is no different than a baseball player hitting a homerun, and standing at the plate posing as the ball sails over the wall. Then getting hit in the head with a 102 mph fastball in his next at bat.

Hovah76

93,508 views • 2 months ago