Ok this is interesting 🤔

My biggest conspiracy theory is the earths population is way less than what we think it is.

She’s a Falun Gong clown. Falun Gong is a cult banned by the CCP so they started an anti-CCP campaign. Not a fan of CCP but Falun Gong is a cult and just makes up stories about China.

Does she not see the population density of China cities??? Mfers have 20,000 people living in ONE building.

70 iq discourse apparently peoples kids can't have kids in 50 years.

What does China gain in inflating its population numbers?

@KPRunion Her math doesn't jive It ignores the fact that people not born in 1950 went on to have kids, their kids had kids before 2000. People didn't need to have 5 kids. They needed to have 3 kids and 6 grandkids, factoring in elderly deaths. Very feasible

There is a large benefit to exaggerating your population. You could use that for elections, shadow votes, a controlled majority on paper, and to make adversaries fear you militarily. I didn't think any country would actually do this

When I lived in Shanghai, I was out partying with some guys who's parents were in the government. This was in 2010. They were telling me the population numbers were Bullshit, I thought they meant there was more people, not the case. They said no way there is 1.4 Billion people in China. I still don't get why boosting the number is advantageous.

This is such bullshit. Where does this rubbish come from

@grok is she accurate about her facts?

Lei cites ~500M in 1950 (UN: ~552M) to 1.27B in 2000 (census: 1.26B)—those line up. But the fertility math doesn't hold: China's TFR was 5-6+ kids/woman in the 1950s-1970s (UN/World Bank data), enough for the 2.3x growth after famine losses. One-child policy started 1979, post most growth. "1B missing"/under-500M today is fringe; credible analysts (e.g. Yi Fuxian) flag ~100M overcount at most. UN, consumption, satellite data support >1.3B. Not accurate overall.

@mehran_go @TaraBull @grok given that China lies in it's official reports, what is your best guess of the actual population of China without using any records from the Chinese Government?

UN models (Bayesian adjustments from global trends, vital stats, migration, & cross-checks like household surveys) estimate ~1.413B for mid-2026. Yi Fuxian (using births/deaths/policy data) flags 100-130M overcount, suggesting ~1.28B. Satellite urban density, electricity/food consumption align closer to 1.3B+. Best guess: 1.33 billion.

@dale_eames @mehran_go @TaraBull @grok show me your source for the claims you made about satellite density and all others and who reported them ?

UN models draw from global trends/vital stats/migration/household surveys (UN World Population Prospects). Yi Fuxian (Univ Wisconsin) uses births/deaths/policy data for ~1.28B estimate (Project Syndicate 2022, Newsweek 2024). Satellite urban density: DMSP/OLS nighttime lights (IEEE studies on China dynamics); 1m multi-modal satellite building maps (Nature Comm Feb 2026). Electricity/food: World Bank per capita ~6524 kWh (2023) + total output/consumption patterns cross-check ~1.3B+. These are independent proxies.

@MrPaulnz @dale_eames @mehran_go @TaraBull Jajaja ai owned you

@MrPaulnz @dale_eames @mehran_go @TaraBull Ask Grok está disponible actualmente solo para suscriptores Premium y Premium+. Suscríbete para desbloquear esta función:

'Interesting' only to retards who don't realize that if this were true, it would only make China look even better. Their GDP would be 4x higher to meet what they've achieved so far lol.

She forgot there was periods before the one child policy and that was when the population inflates

She's a mathematician and couldn't work that out 😅

That is interesting. The one child policy was in effect for years! According to what I had read, often the female child was aborted or killed because the male was considered to be a better investment, that would put a large ratio between male & female, meaning fewer births!

This is true, it's all bullshit. China has been lying with all their numbers for years.

Didn't they also kill female children? Such that they are in a major quandary because they have all men and no women?

She has a clear line of thought and an argument that is worth it but my question is - What does China gain from manipulating population figures?

Well I urge you to look at this we need to understand this too there is not yet overpopulation but we could live with 50.000.000.000+ people with different agriculture methods but this exponential growth factor populations can grow yes cities in China had 1 one child policy, but rural areas since the country feeds the city do not: This article written by me explains some possibilities to resolve feeding population issues and the max number of people the earth can sustain based on methods we use rather then mathematical number that's another solution to the rather gloomy view of the professor above... Look especially at the grok discussion of you want to have an idea how it works, Been gardening for 20 years as a counterweight for technology interests

CCP troll bots are working hard to discredit Lei on this post.

Americans are really bad in math, why do you need a random liberal Chinese woman to tell you stupid shit like this.

Sorry but the argument of takes 2 to replace is true and the population stats the same is true if you assume that the moment the 2nd kid is born the 2 parents die. There are plenty of 4 generation families living. So that argument is wrong. Also the density is insane there

4 decades still only less than 1 generation, this bitch's math don't math

There was an article at the end of Covid talking about a huge drop in cell phone numbers in China.

Falun Gong clowns clowning dumb Americans and makes shit ton of money for doing it😂

She definitely has a very very strong theory.

Whats crazy though she is usually 99% accurate on the stuff she says. She literally said Xi was going to arrest his friend and commander of the military for like a year.

Hidden Dragon Paper Tiger.

So @joerogan had a point,that maybe there are a billion Jews in the world.smh.

Government all over the world are always good at covering things they don't want people to know,they always succeed.

Yeah it’s a very interesting take. The thing is there are other aspects that wouldn’t make sense if this was correct. 300 million on one of the major cell phone companies etc. it does raise questions. She’s not wrong in her premise.

Mass production of clones.

She gave evidence to support her claims I most definitely think she's not bluffing