Video yükleniyor...

Video Yüklenemedi

Ana Sayfaya Dön

O’Leary: It would have been better on a practical basis to have not done this I think… Hunt: The Supreme Court or the President? O’Leary: The Supreme Court! They caused a nightmare. What am I supposed to do next?

Acyn's profile picture

Acyn

727,573 subscribers

64,014 görüntüleme • 4 ay önce •via X (Twitter)

Haberler & PolitikaBilim & Teknoloji
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Yorum

Yorum bulunmuyor

Orijinal gönderinin yorumları burada görünecek

Benzer Videolar

The SCOTUS decision has been PICKED APART by every person with any degree of intellect, and Kevin O'Leary aka Mr. Wonderful calls it a NIGHTMARE because nobody knows what's next: "The Supreme Court- caused a nightmare here. They call it a mess themselves. What am I supposed to do next?"
0:48

The SCOTUS decision has been PICKED APART by every person with any degree of intellect, and Kevin O'Leary aka Mr. Wonderful calls it a NIGHTMARE because nobody knows what's next: "The Supreme Court- caused a nightmare here. They call it a mess themselves. What am I supposed to do next?"

Gunther Eagleman™

38,437 görüntüleme • 4 ay önce

MacCallum: What do you think The White House should do in this situation? Gowdy: I think what they ought to do is probably follow the judge’s order and the supreme court decision which used the word facilitate. Also on that opinion, the words accidental, mistake and illegal. Those are not three good words you want in a supreme court decision.. the president may not agree with that but bring him back and remove him to another country but what we can't have is any executive disobeying or not following a judge's decision
1:24

MacCallum: What do you think The White House should do in this situation? Gowdy: I think what they ought to do is probably follow the judge’s order and the supreme court decision which used the word facilitate. Also on that opinion, the words accidental, mistake and illegal. Those are not three good words you want in a supreme court decision.. the president may not agree with that but bring him back and remove him to another country but what we can't have is any executive disobeying or not following a judge's decision

Acyn

1,112,434 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce

🚨 JUST IN: President Trump reveals he will GO to the Supreme Court to WATCH their ruling on his Tariff Power. "That is why I'm going down to the Supreme Court to WATCH. I have not done that, but I think it is ONE of the MOST IMPORTANT cases ever brought!"
3:30

🚨 JUST IN: President Trump reveals he will GO to the Supreme Court to WATCH their ruling on his Tariff Power. "That is why I'm going down to the Supreme Court to WATCH. I have not done that, but I think it is ONE of the MOST IMPORTANT cases ever brought!"

TV News Now

27,990 görüntüleme • 8 ay önce

Bessent on the Supreme Court examining Trump's tariffs: "This is one of President Trump's signature policies, and traditionally the Supreme Court does not interfere with a president's signature policy... I don't think the Supreme Court wants to wade into a mess like that."
1:47

Bessent on the Supreme Court examining Trump's tariffs: "This is one of President Trump's signature policies, and traditionally the Supreme Court does not interfere with a president's signature policy... I don't think the Supreme Court wants to wade into a mess like that."

FactPost

14,546 görüntüleme • 7 ay önce

AOC: In the time since the Supreme Court gutted the Voting Rights Act, we have seen exactly why it existed in the first place… I think this will be a moral stain on the Supreme Court for generations. It’s our obligation to check what is very clearly an abuse of power in the courts.
1:06

AOC: In the time since the Supreme Court gutted the Voting Rights Act, we have seen exactly why it existed in the first place… I think this will be a moral stain on the Supreme Court for generations. It’s our obligation to check what is very clearly an abuse of power in the courts.

Acyn

85,718 görüntüleme • 1 ay önce

“If you remember, I took my former boss, a sitting President to court 11 times. From trial court up to the Supreme Court. I swear I never saw any judge from the trial court to the Supreme Court and yet I got judgements against a sitting President. Do you think it is possible today?”. - Former Vice President, H.E, Atiku Abubakar
0:39

“If you remember, I took my former boss, a sitting President to court 11 times. From trial court up to the Supreme Court. I swear I never saw any judge from the trial court to the Supreme Court and yet I got judgements against a sitting President. Do you think it is possible today?”. - Former Vice President, H.E, Atiku Abubakar

DGov

167,641 görüntüleme • 3 ay önce

🚨MAJOR BREAKING NEWS: President Trump says that he will GO to the Supreme Court to WATCH their ruling on his Tariff Power. "That is why I'm going down to the Supreme Court to WATCH." "I have not done that, but I think it is ONE of the MOST IMPORTANT Cases EVER Brought!"
0:24

🚨MAJOR BREAKING NEWS: President Trump says that he will GO to the Supreme Court to WATCH their ruling on his Tariff Power. "That is why I'm going down to the Supreme Court to WATCH." "I have not done that, but I think it is ONE of the MOST IMPORTANT Cases EVER Brought!"

The Patriot Oasis™

1,069,624 görüntüleme • 8 ay önce

President Trump suggests he might attend Supreme Court arguments on tariffs next month: “I think it's one of the most important decisions in the history of the Supreme Court. And I might go there. I really believe I have an obligation to go there.”
0:33

President Trump suggests he might attend Supreme Court arguments on tariffs next month: “I think it's one of the most important decisions in the history of the Supreme Court. And I might go there. I really believe I have an obligation to go there.”

Fox News

134,238 görüntüleme • 8 ay önce

Reporter: What do you make of the Supreme Court ruling today in regards to the mail-in ballots… Trump: I think it was very detrimental to honest elections. Basically they're keeping it a little bit the way it is now. They may have a little bit of a restriction based on the wording..
1:11

Reporter: What do you make of the Supreme Court ruling today in regards to the mail-in ballots… Trump: I think it was very detrimental to honest elections. Basically they're keeping it a little bit the way it is now. They may have a little bit of a restriction based on the wording..

Acyn

58,391 görüntüleme • 9 gün önce

.Vice President JD Vance: "I would bet every dollar that I own that the next time the Democrats have control of the Senate, they will break the filibuster, pack the Supreme Court, and destroy this country. We have to do it NOW in order to save the country."
1:18

.Vice President JD Vance: "I would bet every dollar that I own that the next time the Democrats have control of the Senate, they will break the filibuster, pack the Supreme Court, and destroy this country. We have to do it NOW in order to save the country."

Rapid Response 47

33,070,466 görüntüleme • 3 ay önce

Figaro: No, everybody doesn't always break the law and go to prison. That's where you've been so focused on the Dow and haven't been focused on what's actually happening O’Leary: Do they get a trial first. I think they do actually Figaro: No they don’t O’Leary: We’re not in America anymore Figaro: You finally get it. O’Leary: That’s not how America works. Figaro: That’s not how it works for you. Phillip: She's making a legitimate point that some people stay in prison even when they're not having a trial O’Leary: You don’t want to go prison, don’t break the law.
1:51

Figaro: No, everybody doesn't always break the law and go to prison. That's where you've been so focused on the Dow and haven't been focused on what's actually happening O’Leary: Do they get a trial first. I think they do actually Figaro: No they don’t O’Leary: We’re not in America anymore Figaro: You finally get it. O’Leary: That’s not how America works. Figaro: That’s not how it works for you. Phillip: She's making a legitimate point that some people stay in prison even when they're not having a trial O’Leary: You don’t want to go prison, don’t break the law.

Acyn

317,127 görüntüleme • 4 ay önce

Jeffries says everything is on the table legislatively to deal with the Supreme Court: In the new Congress, we’re going to have to do something about this Supreme Court, and let me be very clear: everything is on the table.
0:32

Jeffries says everything is on the table legislatively to deal with the Supreme Court: In the new Congress, we’re going to have to do something about this Supreme Court, and let me be very clear: everything is on the table.

Acyn

620,509 görüntüleme • 2 ay önce

“Constitutionally, the Supreme Court has the right to reserve its judgment for three months, so the Supreme Court can say we have not done anything wrong.” - Reuben Abati on ADC's Request for a Timely Verdict from the Supreme Court on its Leadership Dispute
2:10

“Constitutionally, the Supreme Court has the right to reserve its judgment for three months, so the Supreme Court can say we have not done anything wrong.” - Reuben Abati on ADC's Request for a Timely Verdict from the Supreme Court on its Leadership Dispute

Imran Muhammad

113,997 görüntüleme • 2 ay önce

O’Leary: I would like to go to defcon one with China— tariffs 400%. Bring the supreme leader to Washington or crush his economy until he has riots in the streets
0:29

O’Leary: I would like to go to defcon one with China— tariffs 400%. Bring the supreme leader to Washington or crush his economy until he has riots in the streets

Acyn

5,952,258 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce

CNN: "Do you agree that the court should be expanded?" SCHIFF: "I do agree and have advocated this for some years now. The most consequential reform in my view would be to put term limits on the Supreme Court...you would have to change the court by expanding it."
0:42

CNN: "Do you agree that the court should be expanded?" SCHIFF: "I do agree and have advocated this for some years now. The most consequential reform in my view would be to put term limits on the Supreme Court...you would have to change the court by expanding it."

RNC Research

175,242 görüntüleme • 8 gün önce

“What is a woman?” comes to the Supreme Court. ALITO: “What is that definition, for equal protection purposes? What does it mean to be a boy or a girl, or a man or a woman?” HARNETT: “...We do not have a definition for the court.”
0:39

“What is a woman?” comes to the Supreme Court. ALITO: “What is that definition, for equal protection purposes? What does it mean to be a boy or a girl, or a man or a woman?” HARNETT: “...We do not have a definition for the court.”

Colin Wright

42,299 görüntüleme • 5 ay önce

🚨Trump responds to the Supreme Court hearing on presidential immunity: "The U.S. Supreme Court had a monumental hearing on immunity and the immunity having to do with presidential immunity, and I think it was made clear that a president has to have immunity—We want presidents that can get things done and bring people together. So, I heard the meeting was quite amazing and the justices were on their game."
2:56

🚨Trump responds to the Supreme Court hearing on presidential immunity: "The U.S. Supreme Court had a monumental hearing on immunity and the immunity having to do with presidential immunity, and I think it was made clear that a president has to have immunity—We want presidents that can get things done and bring people together. So, I heard the meeting was quite amazing and the justices were on their game."

Benny Johnson

2,051,908 görüntüleme • 2 yıl önce

HOLY SHIT. Listen to this exchange at the Supreme Court: Justice Alito: “For equal protection purposes, what does it mean to be a boy or a girl or a man or a woman?" Pro-trans lawyer: "We do not have a definition for the court.”
1:34

HOLY SHIT. Listen to this exchange at the Supreme Court: Justice Alito: “For equal protection purposes, what does it mean to be a boy or a girl or a man or a woman?" Pro-trans lawyer: "We do not have a definition for the court.”

Libs of TikTok

951,154 görüntüleme • 5 ay önce