Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Zur Startseite

On August 20, 1990, during physicist Robert Lazar’s sentencing hearing in a Nevada court, his W-2 form: listing the United States Department of Naval Intelligence as his employer - was entered into evidence to verify his employment and income. If the document had been fake or fraudulent, the judge...

UAPLuigi's profile picture

UAP ★ Luigi ★👁️⃤ 🇺🇸 κρυπτός W.👽MJ12 SOM1-01🫈

3,941 subscribers

30,315 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten •via X (Twitter)

Nachrichten & PolitikWissenschaft & Technologie
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Kommentare

Keine Kommentare verfügbar

Kommentare vom Original-Post werden hier angezeigt

Ähnliche Videos

Bob Lazar submitted his W-2 from the Dept. of Naval Intelligence to the Court in 1990...🧐🤔 Bob Lazar submitted his W-2 from the Department of Naval Intelligence to the Court in 1990 for his sentencing hearing, after pleading guilty to felony pandering. Some of Bob's detractors say he would never make his S4 claims under oath, however it would've quite risky to submit this document to the court if it was falsified. Further, the judge for Bob's case said "it's obvious it is very difficult to get information on Mr. Lazar from government sources. Enormously difficult."
1:30

Bob Lazar submitted his W-2 from the Dept. of Naval Intelligence to the Court in 1990...🧐🤔 Bob Lazar submitted his W-2 from the Department of Naval Intelligence to the Court in 1990 for his sentencing hearing, after pleading guilty to felony pandering. Some of Bob's detractors say he would never make his S4 claims under oath, however it would've quite risky to submit this document to the court if it was falsified. Further, the judge for Bob's case said "it's obvious it is very difficult to get information on Mr. Lazar from government sources. Enormously difficult."

UFO mania

51,141 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten

Bob Lazar: The Troubled Criminal Past That Debunks His Claims To Working On Flying Saucers In this segment with RebeccaWatson@bsky.social why not, she breaks down the timeline of criminal activity and the very suspicious death of the former wife of Bob Lazar, which was brought forward from excellent investigative work by SignalsIntelligence If you watch this and don’t immediately question everything about Lazar, then you are the target audience for his lies, echoed further by Jeremy Kenyon Lockyer Corbell & George Knapp. Matter of fact, the documented raiding of Lazar’s residence DIRECTLY contradicts what Corbell claimed in his terrible documentary about Lazar.
4:47

Bob Lazar: The Troubled Criminal Past That Debunks His Claims To Working On Flying Saucers In this segment with [email protected] why not, she breaks down the timeline of criminal activity and the very suspicious death of the former wife of Bob Lazar, which was brought forward from excellent investigative work by SignalsIntelligence If you watch this and don’t immediately question everything about Lazar, then you are the target audience for his lies, echoed further by Jeremy Kenyon Lockyer Corbell & George Knapp. Matter of fact, the documented raiding of Lazar’s residence DIRECTLY contradicts what Corbell claimed in his terrible documentary about Lazar.

Chris Unleashed

48,401 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

How this man is walking free is beyond me. He was the director of the most powerful and corrupt intelligence agency on the planet. John Brennan: Russians went undercover into Mar-a-Lago and made copies of the documents that Trump had stolen and stored there. “Which is why I think it’s so important for the Department of Justice, the FBI, and the Intelligence Community to get to the bottom of this.” Yet he sent his crew to raid Mar-a-Lago to retrieve Barack Obama’s falsified intelligence report (ICA). This is not just propaganda, slander, defamation, or fraud—it’s a CIA operation to overthrow the sitting president of the United States. What was Pam Bondi doing for the past year and a half?
1:32

How this man is walking free is beyond me. He was the director of the most powerful and corrupt intelligence agency on the planet. John Brennan: Russians went undercover into Mar-a-Lago and made copies of the documents that Trump had stolen and stored there. “Which is why I think it’s so important for the Department of Justice, the FBI, and the Intelligence Community to get to the bottom of this.” Yet he sent his crew to raid Mar-a-Lago to retrieve Barack Obama’s falsified intelligence report (ICA). This is not just propaganda, slander, defamation, or fraud—it’s a CIA operation to overthrow the sitting president of the United States. What was Pam Bondi doing for the past year and a half?

🇺🇸RealRobert🇺🇸

26,582 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

FBI Director Kash Patel talks about what he’s proved Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama did “It took me 2 years of my life to prove the following, that a political party in the United States of America in the 21st century would go overseas and hire some bogus intelligence asset to manufacture fraudulent, fake unverified information. Funnel that to not just the intelligence community, but the Federal Bureau of Investigation, and then take those package lies that they had paid for with campaign finance funds, and go into a secret surveillance court and illegally spy on your opponent to be the next president of the United States. I think that was 45 seconds. That took two years of my life. And what did we find out? The FISA court themselves came back and said these warrants were illegal, that the FBI did not provide evidence of exculpatory evidence and innocence, and that the FBI essentially lied in those applications.” It was a coup. It was literally treason and not a single people has been held accountable. Think about that ZERO accountability even when the FBI Director has proven evidence of treason This is where we are….
0:52

FBI Director Kash Patel talks about what he’s proved Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama did “It took me 2 years of my life to prove the following, that a political party in the United States of America in the 21st century would go overseas and hire some bogus intelligence asset to manufacture fraudulent, fake unverified information. Funnel that to not just the intelligence community, but the Federal Bureau of Investigation, and then take those package lies that they had paid for with campaign finance funds, and go into a secret surveillance court and illegally spy on your opponent to be the next president of the United States. I think that was 45 seconds. That took two years of my life. And what did we find out? The FISA court themselves came back and said these warrants were illegal, that the FBI did not provide evidence of exculpatory evidence and innocence, and that the FBI essentially lied in those applications.” It was a coup. It was literally treason and not a single people has been held accountable. Think about that ZERO accountability even when the FBI Director has proven evidence of treason This is where we are….

Whiplash437

57,535 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

FBI Director Kash Patel talks about what he’s proved Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama did “It took me 2 years of my life to prove the following, that a political party in the United States of America in the 21st century would go overseas and hire some bogus intelligence asset to manufacture fraudulent, fake unverified information. Funnel that to not just the intelligence community, but the Federal Bureau of Investigation, and then take those package lies that they had paid for with campaign finance funds, and go into a secret surveillance court and illegally spy on your opponent to be the next president of the United States. I think that was 45 seconds. That took two years of my life. And what did we find out? The FISA court themselves came back and said these warrants were illegal, that the FBI did not provide evidence of exculpatory evidence and innocence, and that the FBI essentially lied in those applications.” It was a coup. It was literally treason and not a single people has been held accountable. Think about that ZERO accountability even when the FBI Director has proven evidence of treason This is where we are….
0:52

FBI Director Kash Patel talks about what he’s proved Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama did “It took me 2 years of my life to prove the following, that a political party in the United States of America in the 21st century would go overseas and hire some bogus intelligence asset to manufacture fraudulent, fake unverified information. Funnel that to not just the intelligence community, but the Federal Bureau of Investigation, and then take those package lies that they had paid for with campaign finance funds, and go into a secret surveillance court and illegally spy on your opponent to be the next president of the United States. I think that was 45 seconds. That took two years of my life. And what did we find out? The FISA court themselves came back and said these warrants were illegal, that the FBI did not provide evidence of exculpatory evidence and innocence, and that the FBI essentially lied in those applications.” It was a coup. It was literally treason and not a single people has been held accountable. Think about that ZERO accountability even when the FBI Director has proven evidence of treason This is where we are….

Wall Street Apes

1,723,749 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

#BREAKING:Psaki: “Tonight the judge who initially oversaw Trump’s lawsuit against the IRS, REOPENED the case, and this is a very significant development because remember, as part of his ‘settlement’, Trump voluntarily [withdrew] his case, he [withdrew] it just days before his personal lawyers and DOJ were going to be forced to explain to the judge how the heck they were actually oppositional parties, how Trump and the IRS that worked for HIS Treasury Department were on different sides…and if the judge didn’t buy their story, it could have been grounds for the judge to toss Trump’s case altogether. So instead of actually working through the court system, Trump settled out of court, again, with HIS OWN Justice Department.”🤦‍♀️
0:48

#BREAKING:Psaki: “Tonight the judge who initially oversaw Trump’s lawsuit against the IRS, REOPENED the case, and this is a very significant development because remember, as part of his ‘settlement’, Trump voluntarily [withdrew] his case, he [withdrew] it just days before his personal lawyers and DOJ were going to be forced to explain to the judge how the heck they were actually oppositional parties, how Trump and the IRS that worked for HIS Treasury Department were on different sides…and if the judge didn’t buy their story, it could have been grounds for the judge to toss Trump’s case altogether. So instead of actually working through the court system, Trump settled out of court, again, with HIS OWN Justice Department.”🤦‍♀️

Emoluments Clause

341,329 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

Here is: FBI Director Kash Patel sums up in just about 45 seconds what took two years to prove—without a shadow of a doubt—that Barack Obama conspired with a foreign power to overthrow the United States government. FBI Director Kash Patel “It took me two years of my life to prove the following: that a political party in the United States of America, in the 21st century, would go overseas and hire some bogus intelligence asset to manufacture fraudulent, fake, unverified information, funnel that not just to the intelligence community but to the Federal Bureau of Investigation, and then take those packaged lies they had paid for with campaign finance funds and go into a secret surveillance court to illegally spy on their opponent to be the next president of the United States. I think that was 45 seconds. That took two years of my life. And what did we find out? The FISA court themselves came back and said these warrants were illegal, that the FBI did not provide exculpatory evidence, and that the FBI essentially lied in those applications.” It was a coup. It was treachery. It was sedition. It was treason. It was the overthrow of the United States government.
0:51

Here is: FBI Director Kash Patel sums up in just about 45 seconds what took two years to prove—without a shadow of a doubt—that Barack Obama conspired with a foreign power to overthrow the United States government. FBI Director Kash Patel “It took me two years of my life to prove the following: that a political party in the United States of America, in the 21st century, would go overseas and hire some bogus intelligence asset to manufacture fraudulent, fake, unverified information, funnel that not just to the intelligence community but to the Federal Bureau of Investigation, and then take those packaged lies they had paid for with campaign finance funds and go into a secret surveillance court to illegally spy on their opponent to be the next president of the United States. I think that was 45 seconds. That took two years of my life. And what did we find out? The FISA court themselves came back and said these warrants were illegal, that the FBI did not provide exculpatory evidence, and that the FBI essentially lied in those applications.” It was a coup. It was treachery. It was sedition. It was treason. It was the overthrow of the United States government.

🇺🇸RealRobert🇺🇸

231,396 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

Oh...My...God This is amazing, for all the wrong reasons. It's as if it was written by the worst of the worst pseudo-skeptics. Watch and laugh. And see who chimes in with agreement. Those are the folks you should ignore. The Real Story of Jeremy Corbell (Search that on YT to find it) Lazar, David Wilcock and Corey Goode. "The orchestrator behind this group is George Knapp, who brought them all together." (I had no idea Knapp brought us Wilcock and Goode! 😂 ) "Jeremy Kenyon Lockyer Corbell serves as the spokesperson for the UFO community." (Where did these folks come up with this stuff?) "All military personnel with direct knowledge of the government's hidden secrets are too intelligent to disclose any information to Jeremy Corbell. They are aware that such actions would result in the loss of their benefits and potential imprisonment. However, Jeremy Corbell remains indifferent to their potential incarceration, as his primary motivation is power and wealth." (Surprised they didn't say Jeremy wants to rule the world. 😎) "Interestingly, David Grusch lacks any firsthand information, which means he cannot suffer any consequences or legal repercussions (Not true. ~Joe). Jeremy understands that David's fabricated narrative (🤦🏼‍♂️) will generate more financial gain for him and his associates. Consequently, Jeremy will always emerge victorious, with ample wealth to accompany his triumph. (Corbell needs to put that on an ample t-shirt. It's like an affirmation.) "Will the UFO community ultimately unite in support of the truth, and firmly request Jeremy Corbell and his associate to permanently depart? Only time will reveal the answer." (Permanently depart? To where? Mars?) #ufos #ufoX #aliens #uap
2:16

Oh...My...God This is amazing, for all the wrong reasons. It's as if it was written by the worst of the worst pseudo-skeptics. Watch and laugh. And see who chimes in with agreement. Those are the folks you should ignore. The Real Story of Jeremy Corbell (Search that on YT to find it) Lazar, David Wilcock and Corey Goode. "The orchestrator behind this group is George Knapp, who brought them all together." (I had no idea Knapp brought us Wilcock and Goode! 😂 ) "Jeremy Kenyon Lockyer Corbell serves as the spokesperson for the UFO community." (Where did these folks come up with this stuff?) "All military personnel with direct knowledge of the government's hidden secrets are too intelligent to disclose any information to Jeremy Corbell. They are aware that such actions would result in the loss of their benefits and potential imprisonment. However, Jeremy Corbell remains indifferent to their potential incarceration, as his primary motivation is power and wealth." (Surprised they didn't say Jeremy wants to rule the world. 😎) "Interestingly, David Grusch lacks any firsthand information, which means he cannot suffer any consequences or legal repercussions (Not true. ~Joe). Jeremy understands that David's fabricated narrative (🤦🏼‍♂️) will generate more financial gain for him and his associates. Consequently, Jeremy will always emerge victorious, with ample wealth to accompany his triumph. (Corbell needs to put that on an ample t-shirt. It's like an affirmation.) "Will the UFO community ultimately unite in support of the truth, and firmly request Jeremy Corbell and his associate to permanently depart? Only time will reveal the answer." (Permanently depart? To where? Mars?) #ufos #ufoX #aliens #uap

Joe Murgia

52,241 Aufrufe • vor 2 Jahren

UFO Whistleblower David Grusch honest opinion of Bob Lazar 👽🛸 “I’m certainly different than him. I came at it from a different angle. I have no information on Bob Lazar. It wasn’t in the scope of my looking into it kind of activities. I don’t know anything that the public doesn’t know... I didn’t have the appropriate investigative privileges to even look into it so I have no idea.” The man who testified to Congress about UAPs and non human biologics stays completely neutral on the guy who claimed he worked on alien craft at S4 Area 51. UFO community does this help or hurt Lazar’s credibility? Is he telling the truth or not? Why do you think Grusch never dug into it? Drop your honest take below 👇
0:34

UFO Whistleblower David Grusch honest opinion of Bob Lazar 👽🛸 “I’m certainly different than him. I came at it from a different angle. I have no information on Bob Lazar. It wasn’t in the scope of my looking into it kind of activities. I don’t know anything that the public doesn’t know... I didn’t have the appropriate investigative privileges to even look into it so I have no idea.” The man who testified to Congress about UAPs and non human biologics stays completely neutral on the guy who claimed he worked on alien craft at S4 Area 51. UFO community does this help or hurt Lazar’s credibility? Is he telling the truth or not? Why do you think Grusch never dug into it? Drop your honest take below 👇

Interstellar

20,384 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

🚨 The attorney for Erika Kirk and the family just addressed Judge Graf directly. His argument: the family hasn't seen the video evidence, and they should get to. His words to the court: "There's a complete distortion of reality that was just put forth." And on what this hearing is really about: "This is about allowing the family to see the evidence" gathered after a 10 month investigation "in which a father, a husband was assassinated." He asked the judge to let the family view the video the way the court has, so they can process the moment. For the record: this is the victim's representative speaking, not the state and not the defense. Three different sets of lawyers, three different interests in that room.
1:32

🚨 The attorney for Erika Kirk and the family just addressed Judge Graf directly. His argument: the family hasn't seen the video evidence, and they should get to. His words to the court: "There's a complete distortion of reality that was just put forth." And on what this hearing is really about: "This is about allowing the family to see the evidence" gathered after a 10 month investigation "in which a father, a husband was assassinated." He asked the judge to let the family view the video the way the court has, so they can process the moment. For the record: this is the victim's representative speaking, not the state and not the defense. Three different sets of lawyers, three different interests in that room.

Danks

22,478 Aufrufe • vor 11 Tagen

🤬 Burlison: Putting Lacatski Under Oath in a Hearing Wasn't a Top Priority Because He Wouldn't Say Anything New 🤬 (I can't believe I just heard that.) Jeremy Kenyon Lockyer Corbell: "Dr. James Lacatski came on our show. He ran the UFO program for the Defense Intelligence Agency, and he admitted on our show that they breached the hull of a UFO in government possession." Burlison at the Last Hearing: "You reported [that] James Lacatski came to you with government possession of NHI craft and how they ultimately gained entry. Can you testify to the veracity of that claim?" George Knapp at the Last Hearing: "Dr. Lacatski is an honorable man who served most of his career with the DIA. A very trusted, high-level rocket scientist and intelligence analyst who inspired the AAWSAP program, as I said earlier. He said this craft, we had managed to get inside of it. It had no wings, no rotor, no tail, it had no fuel, no fuel tanks. They didn't know how it flew or how it was operated. It clearly looked like it was aerodynamic, but he would not go further. He's a by-the-book guy, and until he gets clearance to say more about that, I don't think we're going to hear much more. "But, it's not ours. It wasn't ours. We didn't make it. We didn't know who made it and how it was built and how it operated. We've got at least one, and I don't know, I think that's enough confirmation that we do have recovered discs and material." (What is written in "Initial Revelations" about that alleged craft, and Lacatski standing by what was written when he was on "Weaponized" is one of the most important claims we've ever had in this field. I don't see it as confirmation that we have craft but we're getting closer. Lacatski saying that he saw it with his own eyes would take it up a notch, but I still wanna see it for myself, and not just in photos and videos. AI is just too good to accept that as proof.) Corbell: "So, and you put that in congressional record. Do you have a way that you can, you know, find out, where is it? He can't tell us, but maybe he can tell you? Where is that craft? Can you go hunt it down? Can you go see it?" Burlison: "You know, that's an interesting question. When it came to Lacatski - and I watched his interview that he did with you guys - and here's what my response to him is. Because he was frustrated that we hadn't reached out to him, but he also kind of, he also admitted that - which is what I was told, and the reason why we haven't reached out to him - is that he's not gonna tell us anything that's not in his books." (Most people on this planet have not read his books!) Corbell: "Well, hold on, hold on. You did reach out to him. There have been three hearings. I reached out to him on behalf of Congress, officially, twice, to say..." Burlison: "You did, that's right, you did." Corbell: "And I had congressional members talk with him the hearing before the last one. He just forgot. But the point is, is that maybe with you guys, in the correct environment, with the right clearances, he can tell you where it is, and you can just put this to bed and go find it." (I'm not against Congress talking to Lacatski in a SCIF, but, IMO, the chances that he tells members of the Secrets Task Force the location of this alleged craft are ZERO. Maybe Rubio would get an answer but he may already know. And if he (Rubio) does know, he's not telling us. At least not yet, and probably, IMO, never.) Burlison: "Yeah. And I remember that. I remember that he was one of the people that we had tasked you to go to reach out to. And for those people that are kind of asking how did that relationship work? Look, we don't have all the contact information for all these people. Why repeat the work that you two have done in building these contacts in your networks? And so, you, basically, patriotically dedicated your time, for free, helping us make contact and kind of coordinate some of those witnesses. (That was an awesome thing for Corbell and Knapp to do and it was for a great cause. The truth!) Burlison: "And I had been told Lacatski is probably not gonna reveal anything that he hasn't already revealed. When I've talked to people, it seemed like it wasn't gonna be new information. And therefore, to me, he wasn't as high of a priority." (He should have been THE priority, as far as witnesses for the hearing. With Lacatski, you have a respected rocket scientist, physicist and intelligence analyst, who has confirmed that this passage from Initial Revelations is accurate: “At the conclusion of a 2011 meeting in the Capitol building with a U.S. Senator and an agency Under Secretary, Lacatski, the only one of this book’s authors present, posed a question. He stated that the United States was in possession of a craft of unknown origin and had successfully gained access to its interior. This craft had a streamlined configuration suitable for aerodynamic flight but no intakes, exhaust, wings, or control surfaces. In fact, it appeared not to have an engine, fuel tanks, or fuel. Lacatski asked: What was the purpose of this craft? Was it a life-support craft useful only for atmospheric reentry or what? If it was a spacecraft, then how did it operate”? And, Lacatski may have seen the craft with his own eyes and entered it. But Burlison (or anybody else on the Task Force) didn't see it as a priority to bring him in, UNDER OATH, and have him repeat what is said in that book, and other important claims from the other two books, and his interviews with Knapp and Corbell? I'm shaking my head as I type this. You know what percentage of the world has read those books and/or watched the, limited, interviews Lacatski has given? Maybe 0.0000000000001% of the population? You had (and still do) a chance to get that man under oath and it wasn't a priority? WTAF? He's getting older and we don't know how much longer he will be around. If, as Rep. Andy Ogles told Matt Laslo, another hearing is coming in January, Lacatski, if he agrees, MUST be part of that. You can ask him about the craft, the alleged paranormal connection, and people getting sick and injured if they get too close to a UAP. And, he can be asked about the hitchhiker effect and claims of contagion. It doesn't matter if he won't add anything new or different than what's in his books or interviews. Put him under oath for the world to see and hear and, hopefully, the mainstream media picks up the story: Rocket Scientist: The USG Has an Otherworldly Craft in its Possession and Have Breached the Hull And maybe, if he's in a Disclosure mood, he'll offer up some surprise like he did in his last interview on Weaponized when he said we have made progress on back engineering these craft but, "it hasn't been achieved to its full extent." That's a MASSIVE claim! Push him to offer up more. And if his answers to many questions are: "It's all in my book"? Make him read from his book so the world can be informed about his claims and what was allegedly discovered in AAWSAP. David Grusch didn't say much more than what he said in his interview with Ross Coulthart and article in The Debrief, but was there ever any thought that he shouldn't have been put under oath and brought in as a witness for that congressional hearing? Of course not!) Burlison: "But to your point, I think getting him in a SCIF and seeing if there's maybe any additional room for him to talk, it might be worthwhile to do that." Knapp: "I think he might. I mean, the last conversations that we've had, it seems like he's edging closer to the idea that, under the right circumstances, he would be willing to share information with Congress, which would be great." (Again, I'm all for putting him the SCIF, too.)
3:29

🤬 Burlison: Putting Lacatski Under Oath in a Hearing Wasn't a Top Priority Because He Wouldn't Say Anything New 🤬 (I can't believe I just heard that.) Jeremy Kenyon Lockyer Corbell: "Dr. James Lacatski came on our show. He ran the UFO program for the Defense Intelligence Agency, and he admitted on our show that they breached the hull of a UFO in government possession." Burlison at the Last Hearing: "You reported [that] James Lacatski came to you with government possession of NHI craft and how they ultimately gained entry. Can you testify to the veracity of that claim?" George Knapp at the Last Hearing: "Dr. Lacatski is an honorable man who served most of his career with the DIA. A very trusted, high-level rocket scientist and intelligence analyst who inspired the AAWSAP program, as I said earlier. He said this craft, we had managed to get inside of it. It had no wings, no rotor, no tail, it had no fuel, no fuel tanks. They didn't know how it flew or how it was operated. It clearly looked like it was aerodynamic, but he would not go further. He's a by-the-book guy, and until he gets clearance to say more about that, I don't think we're going to hear much more. "But, it's not ours. It wasn't ours. We didn't make it. We didn't know who made it and how it was built and how it operated. We've got at least one, and I don't know, I think that's enough confirmation that we do have recovered discs and material." (What is written in "Initial Revelations" about that alleged craft, and Lacatski standing by what was written when he was on "Weaponized" is one of the most important claims we've ever had in this field. I don't see it as confirmation that we have craft but we're getting closer. Lacatski saying that he saw it with his own eyes would take it up a notch, but I still wanna see it for myself, and not just in photos and videos. AI is just too good to accept that as proof.) Corbell: "So, and you put that in congressional record. Do you have a way that you can, you know, find out, where is it? He can't tell us, but maybe he can tell you? Where is that craft? Can you go hunt it down? Can you go see it?" Burlison: "You know, that's an interesting question. When it came to Lacatski - and I watched his interview that he did with you guys - and here's what my response to him is. Because he was frustrated that we hadn't reached out to him, but he also kind of, he also admitted that - which is what I was told, and the reason why we haven't reached out to him - is that he's not gonna tell us anything that's not in his books." (Most people on this planet have not read his books!) Corbell: "Well, hold on, hold on. You did reach out to him. There have been three hearings. I reached out to him on behalf of Congress, officially, twice, to say..." Burlison: "You did, that's right, you did." Corbell: "And I had congressional members talk with him the hearing before the last one. He just forgot. But the point is, is that maybe with you guys, in the correct environment, with the right clearances, he can tell you where it is, and you can just put this to bed and go find it." (I'm not against Congress talking to Lacatski in a SCIF, but, IMO, the chances that he tells members of the Secrets Task Force the location of this alleged craft are ZERO. Maybe Rubio would get an answer but he may already know. And if he (Rubio) does know, he's not telling us. At least not yet, and probably, IMO, never.) Burlison: "Yeah. And I remember that. I remember that he was one of the people that we had tasked you to go to reach out to. And for those people that are kind of asking how did that relationship work? Look, we don't have all the contact information for all these people. Why repeat the work that you two have done in building these contacts in your networks? And so, you, basically, patriotically dedicated your time, for free, helping us make contact and kind of coordinate some of those witnesses. (That was an awesome thing for Corbell and Knapp to do and it was for a great cause. The truth!) Burlison: "And I had been told Lacatski is probably not gonna reveal anything that he hasn't already revealed. When I've talked to people, it seemed like it wasn't gonna be new information. And therefore, to me, he wasn't as high of a priority." (He should have been THE priority, as far as witnesses for the hearing. With Lacatski, you have a respected rocket scientist, physicist and intelligence analyst, who has confirmed that this passage from Initial Revelations is accurate: “At the conclusion of a 2011 meeting in the Capitol building with a U.S. Senator and an agency Under Secretary, Lacatski, the only one of this book’s authors present, posed a question. He stated that the United States was in possession of a craft of unknown origin and had successfully gained access to its interior. This craft had a streamlined configuration suitable for aerodynamic flight but no intakes, exhaust, wings, or control surfaces. In fact, it appeared not to have an engine, fuel tanks, or fuel. Lacatski asked: What was the purpose of this craft? Was it a life-support craft useful only for atmospheric reentry or what? If it was a spacecraft, then how did it operate”? And, Lacatski may have seen the craft with his own eyes and entered it. But Burlison (or anybody else on the Task Force) didn't see it as a priority to bring him in, UNDER OATH, and have him repeat what is said in that book, and other important claims from the other two books, and his interviews with Knapp and Corbell? I'm shaking my head as I type this. You know what percentage of the world has read those books and/or watched the, limited, interviews Lacatski has given? Maybe 0.0000000000001% of the population? You had (and still do) a chance to get that man under oath and it wasn't a priority? WTAF? He's getting older and we don't know how much longer he will be around. If, as Rep. Andy Ogles told Matt Laslo, another hearing is coming in January, Lacatski, if he agrees, MUST be part of that. You can ask him about the craft, the alleged paranormal connection, and people getting sick and injured if they get too close to a UAP. And, he can be asked about the hitchhiker effect and claims of contagion. It doesn't matter if he won't add anything new or different than what's in his books or interviews. Put him under oath for the world to see and hear and, hopefully, the mainstream media picks up the story: Rocket Scientist: The USG Has an Otherworldly Craft in its Possession and Have Breached the Hull And maybe, if he's in a Disclosure mood, he'll offer up some surprise like he did in his last interview on Weaponized when he said we have made progress on back engineering these craft but, "it hasn't been achieved to its full extent." That's a MASSIVE claim! Push him to offer up more. And if his answers to many questions are: "It's all in my book"? Make him read from his book so the world can be informed about his claims and what was allegedly discovered in AAWSAP. David Grusch didn't say much more than what he said in his interview with Ross Coulthart and article in The Debrief, but was there ever any thought that he shouldn't have been put under oath and brought in as a witness for that congressional hearing? Of course not!) Burlison: "But to your point, I think getting him in a SCIF and seeing if there's maybe any additional room for him to talk, it might be worthwhile to do that." Knapp: "I think he might. I mean, the last conversations that we've had, it seems like he's edging closer to the idea that, under the right circumstances, he would be willing to share information with Congress, which would be great." (Again, I'm all for putting him the SCIF, too.)

Joe Murgia

30,311 Aufrufe • vor 7 Monaten

For accuracy: Aidan’s affidavit was not impounded when it was first covered on online. This issue was expressly addressed during the hearing. The judge asked whether the affidavit was impounded, and defense counsel (Attorney Bradl) confirmed that it was not. The judge then stated that it was therefore a “public record.” The only remaining concern raised was whether the plaintiff’s address should have been removed. A temporary impoundment order was issued later in the hearing for the exhibits, at which point Bradl informed the court that some of the materials was already publicly available online. A public record is a public record. In Massachusetts, once a court record (like an affidavit) has already been lawfully made public—including be posted or shared on social media—impoundment of the official court record does not “unpublish” it or retroactively make the public version secret or inaccessible. The judge’s temporary impoundment order applies to the parties of record in the case. It is not surprising that Kate is so wrong on this point. She is doing exactly what the judge ordered must stop, and the judge certainly will not consider her meddling in his decision.
0:30

For accuracy: Aidan’s affidavit was not impounded when it was first covered on online. This issue was expressly addressed during the hearing. The judge asked whether the affidavit was impounded, and defense counsel (Attorney Bradl) confirmed that it was not. The judge then stated that it was therefore a “public record.” The only remaining concern raised was whether the plaintiff’s address should have been removed. A temporary impoundment order was issued later in the hearing for the exhibits, at which point Bradl informed the court that some of the materials was already publicly available online. A public record is a public record. In Massachusetts, once a court record (like an affidavit) has already been lawfully made public—including be posted or shared on social media—impoundment of the official court record does not “unpublish” it or retroactively make the public version secret or inaccessible. The judge’s temporary impoundment order applies to the parties of record in the case. It is not surprising that Kate is so wrong on this point. She is doing exactly what the judge ordered must stop, and the judge certainly will not consider her meddling in his decision.

KY Maverick

13,089 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

Jeremy Corbell: "Matthew Sullivan had 'Hands On' experience with UFO's just like Bob Lazar. He was about to testify to congress before he DIED suspiciously" The decorated Air Force intelligence officer and Bronze Star recipient had direct hands on with a recovered UFO craft. Corbell explained Sullivan was prepared to testify behind closed doors and that he "had direct hands on with the craft." Corbell told Jesse Michels that the circumstances "Ain't adding up all the math" and noted a congressional letter alongside the FBI review. Sullivan died May 12, 2024 in what was reported as an accidental overdose of alcohol and prescription drugs. This case centers on a man with firsthand knowledge of UAP crash retrieval programs who was set to share details with Congress just weeks before his death. The investigation continues.
2:33

Jeremy Corbell: "Matthew Sullivan had 'Hands On' experience with UFO's just like Bob Lazar. He was about to testify to congress before he DIED suspiciously" The decorated Air Force intelligence officer and Bronze Star recipient had direct hands on with a recovered UFO craft. Corbell explained Sullivan was prepared to testify behind closed doors and that he "had direct hands on with the craft." Corbell told Jesse Michels that the circumstances "Ain't adding up all the math" and noted a congressional letter alongside the FBI review. Sullivan died May 12, 2024 in what was reported as an accidental overdose of alcohol and prescription drugs. This case centers on a man with firsthand knowledge of UAP crash retrieval programs who was set to share details with Congress just weeks before his death. The investigation continues.

Interstellar

22,565 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

NEW: Tucker Carlson explains how the FBI and CIA conducted a coup to take out President Richard Nixon with help from journalist Bob Woodward. “Richard Nixon was taken out by the FBI and CIA, and with the help of Bob Woodward.” “[Woodward] was that guy. And who is his main source for Watergate? Oh, the number two guy at the FBI. Oh, so you have the naval intelligence officer working with the FBI official to destroy the president. Okay. So that's a deep state coup.” “Richard Nixon was elected by more votes than any president in American history in the 1972 election.” “The most popular president in his reelection campaign, and two years later, he's gone, undone by a naval intel officer, the number two guy at the FBI and a bunch of CIA employees.” “You tell me what that is. Those are the facts. Those are not disputed facts.”
3:11

NEW: Tucker Carlson explains how the FBI and CIA conducted a coup to take out President Richard Nixon with help from journalist Bob Woodward. “Richard Nixon was taken out by the FBI and CIA, and with the help of Bob Woodward.” “[Woodward] was that guy. And who is his main source for Watergate? Oh, the number two guy at the FBI. Oh, so you have the naval intelligence officer working with the FBI official to destroy the president. Okay. So that's a deep state coup.” “Richard Nixon was elected by more votes than any president in American history in the 1972 election.” “The most popular president in his reelection campaign, and two years later, he's gone, undone by a naval intel officer, the number two guy at the FBI and a bunch of CIA employees.” “You tell me what that is. Those are the facts. Those are not disputed facts.”

Collin Rugg

3,271,665 Aufrufe • vor 2 Jahren

Tucker Carlson explains how the FBI and CIA conducted a coup to take out President Richard Nixon with help from journalist Bob Woodward. “Richard Nixon was taken out by the FBI and CIA, and with the help of Bob Woodward.” “[Woodward] was that guy. And who is his main source for Watergate? Oh, the number two guy at the FBI. Oh, so you have the naval intelligence officer working with the FBI official to destroy the president. Okay. So that's a deep state coup.” “Richard Nixon was elected by more votes than any president in American history in the 1972 election.” “The most popular president in his reelection campaign, and two years later, he's gone, undone by a naval intel officer, the number two guy at the FBI and a bunch of CIA employees.” “You tell me what that is. Those are the facts. Those are not disputed facts.”
3:12

Tucker Carlson explains how the FBI and CIA conducted a coup to take out President Richard Nixon with help from journalist Bob Woodward. “Richard Nixon was taken out by the FBI and CIA, and with the help of Bob Woodward.” “[Woodward] was that guy. And who is his main source for Watergate? Oh, the number two guy at the FBI. Oh, so you have the naval intelligence officer working with the FBI official to destroy the president. Okay. So that's a deep state coup.” “Richard Nixon was elected by more votes than any president in American history in the 1972 election.” “The most popular president in his reelection campaign, and two years later, he's gone, undone by a naval intel officer, the number two guy at the FBI and a bunch of CIA employees.” “You tell me what that is. Those are the facts. Those are not disputed facts.”

redpillbot

238,261 Aufrufe • vor 6 Monaten

At the Space Symposium’s first-ever UFO panel, Jeremy Kenyon Lockyer Corbell asked David Grusch directly: “Straight up, what do you want people to know?” Grusch’s reply: “There’s truly anomalous signatures in the skies.” He added that the U.S. government understands this represents “a form of sentient nonhuman intelligence,” that “the universe is teeming with life,” and that the public should be prepared for truths that may be “a hard pill to swallow.” This was not a fringe podcast or rumor mill. It was a major space event, with Grusch speaking beside Rep. Eric Burlison, Rod Roddenberry, and Mike Gold about what he believes the government already knows. #ufox #ufotwitter
1:14

At the Space Symposium’s first-ever UFO panel, Jeremy Kenyon Lockyer Corbell asked David Grusch directly: “Straight up, what do you want people to know?” Grusch’s reply: “There’s truly anomalous signatures in the skies.” He added that the U.S. government understands this represents “a form of sentient nonhuman intelligence,” that “the universe is teeming with life,” and that the public should be prepared for truths that may be “a hard pill to swallow.” This was not a fringe podcast or rumor mill. It was a major space event, with Grusch speaking beside Rep. Eric Burlison, Rod Roddenberry, and Mike Gold about what he believes the government already knows. #ufox #ufotwitter

Tom Thompson🛸 (ＣＯＲＴＥＸ ＺＥＲＯ)

37,062 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

“I think that was 45 seconds — that took me two years of my life.” Kash Patel just summed up in 45 seconds what took him TWO YEARS of his life to prove about the Deep State’s illegal spying operation on President Trump. PATEL: “Remember this, it took me two years of my life to prove the following…” “That a political party in the United States of America in the 21st century would go overseas and hire some bogus intelligence asset to manufacture fraudulent, fake, unverified information…” “Funnel that to, not just the intelligence community, but the Federal Bureau of Investigation, and then take those packaged lies that they had paid for with campaign finance funds and go into a secret surveillance court and illegally spy on your opponent to be the next president of the United States.” “I think that was 45 seconds — that took me two years of my life.” “And what did we find out? The FISA court themselves came back and said these warrants were illegal.”
2:06

“I think that was 45 seconds — that took me two years of my life.” Kash Patel just summed up in 45 seconds what took him TWO YEARS of his life to prove about the Deep State’s illegal spying operation on President Trump. PATEL: “Remember this, it took me two years of my life to prove the following…” “That a political party in the United States of America in the 21st century would go overseas and hire some bogus intelligence asset to manufacture fraudulent, fake, unverified information…” “Funnel that to, not just the intelligence community, but the Federal Bureau of Investigation, and then take those packaged lies that they had paid for with campaign finance funds and go into a secret surveillance court and illegally spy on your opponent to be the next president of the United States.” “I think that was 45 seconds — that took me two years of my life.” “And what did we find out? The FISA court themselves came back and said these warrants were illegal.”

Overton

352,885 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

Jacques Vallée says that more than 20 years ago the U.S. government was already capable of establishing “direct, structured communications” with a non-human intelligence through a “very sophisticated process,” conducted on an ongoing basis under controlled laboratory conditions at a secure facility he had never heard publicly referenced. In the same retelling, he allegedly distinguishes this intelligence from familiar case lore (such as Trinity or Varginha), suggesting instead something closer to “higher level controllers,” and adds that we have ways to engineer this kind of interaction. #ufotwitter #ufox Jeremy Kenyon Lockyer Corbell George Knapp
5:03

Jacques Vallée says that more than 20 years ago the U.S. government was already capable of establishing “direct, structured communications” with a non-human intelligence through a “very sophisticated process,” conducted on an ongoing basis under controlled laboratory conditions at a secure facility he had never heard publicly referenced. In the same retelling, he allegedly distinguishes this intelligence from familiar case lore (such as Trinity or Varginha), suggesting instead something closer to “higher level controllers,” and adds that we have ways to engineer this kind of interaction. #ufotwitter #ufox Jeremy Kenyon Lockyer Corbell George Knapp

Tom Thompson🛸 (ＣＯＲＴＥＸ ＺＥＲＯ)

61,635 Aufrufe • vor 6 Monaten

What a tragic case! George lost his life & there was no justice for the victims. George Stinney Jr was falsely convicted at the age of 14. He was accused of killing two girls, Betty (age 11) and Mary (age 7). The bodies were found near the house where George lived with his parents. Before his execution, George spent 81 days in prison before he was ever able to see his parents. He spent this time in solitary confinement, in a jail 80 miles from the city. He was questioned without the presence of his parents or a lawyer. His trial lasted only 2 hours, and the sentence was handed down 10 minutes later. The boy's parents were not allowed in the court room, and was subsequently expelled from that city after the trial. During his trial & until the day of his execution, George always carried a Bible in his hands. On the day of his execution, they used the Bible he was carrying as a booster seat because he was too short for the adult sized electric chair. 70 years after his execution, a judge in South Carolina finally overruled George's conviction. It was determined that the beam used in the murder, which weighed more than 19.07 kilograms, would have been too large for George to lift. There was no way he could have used it to strike the victims. ‘The Green Mile’ by Stephen King was inspired by George's case.
2:11

What a tragic case! George lost his life & there was no justice for the victims. George Stinney Jr was falsely convicted at the age of 14. He was accused of killing two girls, Betty (age 11) and Mary (age 7). The bodies were found near the house where George lived with his parents. Before his execution, George spent 81 days in prison before he was ever able to see his parents. He spent this time in solitary confinement, in a jail 80 miles from the city. He was questioned without the presence of his parents or a lawyer. His trial lasted only 2 hours, and the sentence was handed down 10 minutes later. The boy's parents were not allowed in the court room, and was subsequently expelled from that city after the trial. During his trial & until the day of his execution, George always carried a Bible in his hands. On the day of his execution, they used the Bible he was carrying as a booster seat because he was too short for the adult sized electric chair. 70 years after his execution, a judge in South Carolina finally overruled George's conviction. It was determined that the beam used in the murder, which weighed more than 19.07 kilograms, would have been too large for George to lift. There was no way he could have used it to strike the victims. ‘The Green Mile’ by Stephen King was inspired by George's case.

bstrat515 👑💛

15,761 Aufrufe • vor 2 Jahren