Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Beim Laden dieses Videos ist ein Problem aufgetreten. Dies könnte an einem vorübergehenden Netzwerkproblem liegen oder das Video ist möglicherweise nicht verfügbar.

On proof-of-work, miners can collude to reorder settled transactions. On proof-of-stake, the biggest pools can reorder or roll back the chain. Settlement finality isn't a given on most networks, it's a property you have to verify before you trust it.

Jake Claver, QFOP

123,891 subscribers

22,702 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat •via X (Twitter)

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Kommentare

Keine Kommentare verfügbar

Kommentare vom Original-Post werden hier angezeigt

Ähnliche Videos

Introducing Ore – A digital currency you can mine from anywhere, at home or on your phone. Ore is a new mineable token launching today on the Solana blockchain. It uses a novel proof-of-work algorithm to guarantee casual miners can never be starved out from earning rewards.

Introducing Ore – A digital currency you can mine from anywhere, at home or on your phone. Ore is a new mineable token launching today on the Solana blockchain. It uses a novel proof-of-work algorithm to guarantee casual miners can never be starved out from earning rewards.

ORE

791,129 Aufrufe • vor 2 Jahren

Starknet’s secure settlement on Ethereum scales the network by orders of magnitude. How? ✅Starknet’s STARK proof of bundled transactions and state diff are sent to Ethereum. ✅The verifier on Ethereum analyzes the proof. ✅Math—meaning the STARK proof—ensures all transactions are valid. ✅The confirmed proof is then sent to the Starknet core smart contract, which updates the Starknet state on-chain. ✅The new Ethereum block is then voted on by nodes and, voila! Finalized. Learn more: 👇

Starknet’s secure settlement on Ethereum scales the network by orders of magnitude. How? ✅Starknet’s STARK proof of bundled transactions and state diff are sent to Ethereum. ✅The verifier on Ethereum analyzes the proof. ✅Math—meaning the STARK proof—ensures all transactions are valid. ✅The confirmed proof is then sent to the Starknet core smart contract, which updates the Starknet state on-chain. ✅The new Ethereum block is then voted on by nodes and, voila! Finalized. Learn more: 👇

Starknet

49,060 Aufrufe • vor 2 Jahren

Sending $KAS to Ryan from Bitwise Near instant finality on a Proof of Work network Institutions are becoming aware of #Kaspa

Sending $KAS to Ryan from Bitwise Near instant finality on a Proof of Work network Institutions are becoming aware of #Kaspa

Vijay 𐤊ailash, CFA, CFP®

45,046 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

it's cooking in testnet currently. -> permissionless, anybody can join -> nearly free agent to agent micropayments at scale -> the chain can theoretically scale upto 10 million transactions per second -> [stateless, zk proofs, verkle, stake-secured routing, proof of intelligence which rewards increasing the network's intelligence]

it's cooking in testnet currently. -> permissionless, anybody can join -> nearly free agent to agent micropayments at scale -> the chain can theoretically scale upto 10 million transactions per second -> [stateless, zk proofs, verkle, stake-secured routing, proof of intelligence which rewards increasing the network's intelligence]

Varun

13,047 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten

🔍 What is Proof of Stake (PoS)? It’s a blockchain consensus mechanism where validators stake cryptocurrency for a chance to verify new blocks. The more you stake, the higher your chances. 💡 But there’s a catch—cheat, and you lose your stake.

🔍 What is Proof of Stake (PoS)? It’s a blockchain consensus mechanism where validators stake cryptocurrency for a chance to verify new blocks. The more you stake, the higher your chances. 💡 But there’s a catch—cheat, and you lose your stake.

Stronghold

17,053 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

Made a short video on the Single Asset Vault (XLS-65) on the XRP Ledger. Before you can borrow on-chain, the money has to come from somewhere. The vault is that shared pool. You deposit, you get shares back, and those shares are your slice of it. If the pool earns, your shares can be worth more when you redeem. First in a series on on-chain lending.

Made a short video on the Single Asset Vault (XLS-65) on the XRP Ledger. Before you can borrow on-chain, the money has to come from somewhere. The vault is that shared pool. You deposit, you get shares back, and those shares are your slice of it. If the pool earns, your shares can be worth more when you redeem. First in a series on on-chain lending.

Joel Mun

161,791 Aufrufe • vor 5 Tagen

How to choose the right weight for your working sets in the gym - You can weight select on a set by set basis - If you’re hitting or exceeding the high end of the rep range, you can/should increase the load even if this means it doesn’t stay uniform on a given day - If you’re falling below or you believe you’re in danger of falling below the low end of the rep range, you can/should decrease the load even if this means it doesn’t stay uniform on a given day - Weight does NOT have to stay uniform across your sets of a given exercise on a given day but you should have a good reason for adding or reducing load Ideal rep range = 5-10ish All sets should end as a result of you hitting failure or your RIR prescription (0-2ish) Is this the ONLY way to train effectively? NO! Is it the most efficient/effective way? YES…or very close

How to choose the right weight for your working sets in the gym - You can weight select on a set by set basis - If you’re hitting or exceeding the high end of the rep range, you can/should increase the load even if this means it doesn’t stay uniform on a given day - If you’re falling below or you believe you’re in danger of falling below the low end of the rep range, you can/should decrease the load even if this means it doesn’t stay uniform on a given day - Weight does NOT have to stay uniform across your sets of a given exercise on a given day but you should have a good reason for adding or reducing load Ideal rep range = 5-10ish All sets should end as a result of you hitting failure or your RIR prescription (0-2ish) Is this the ONLY way to train effectively? NO! Is it the most efficient/effective way? YES…or very close

Dean Turner

23,076 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

Vitalik Buterin explains why proof-of-stake is more secure than proof-of-work “I think proof of stake is very secure because to attack the system, you need to have basically as much stake as the rest of the network. Right now, for example, we have 5 million ETH staking, which means you have to come up with 5 million ETH and then join the network.” At the time of this writing, more than 37 million ETH are being staked, with 3 million ETH waiting to join via the validator queue. At today’s prices, that’s more than $80 billion of ETH someone would have to acquire to attack the network and revert finalized blocks, which is more than the cost of attacking even the Bitcoin network by some estimates. The other defense mechanism that proof-of-stake has that proof-of-work doesn’t is slashing, which makes Ethereum antifragile. Vitalik explains: “Recovering from attacks is much easier in proof-of-stake than proof-of-work. For many kinds of attacks you do against [the Ethereum] network, we have this concept of automatic slashing. In order to revert a finalized block, you basically have to have a big portion of your validators sign two conflicting messages. This is something where once these messages are on the network, you can go and prove ‘these people did it.’ So we have this feature in the protocol where you basically take all these people who provably misbehaved and you burn their coins.” Vitalik also acknowledges the possibility of censoring attacks, where if 1/3rd of validators refuse to attest, the chain can’t finalize. But, as he explains, Ethereum has a contingency plan for this as well: “Everyone who got censored would create a minority chain, and the community would have to do a soft fork. The would have to say, ‘this chain is clearly attacking us and this one is not attacking us, so we’re going to join this chain.’ Then what happens is, on that new chain, the attackers also lose a lot of coins. The difference between proof-of-stake and proof-of-work is that in a proof-of-stake system, you can identify specific participants — and this isn’t a human going in and saying ‘I don’t like you’. It’s all automated.” One last benefit of proof-of-stake is that security scales with the value of the network. As Vitalik put it five years ago, it is really relative security, and not absolute security, that matters: “The security needs of a thing have to be proportional to the size of that thing, because as a thing gets bigger, its enemies become bigger and more well-motivated. If BTC were 100x as big as it is today, the value from destroying it would be 100x higher, and the kinds of actors that would want to care about destroying it would be much bigger and scarier. This is also why countries of all sizes have roughly similarly sized militaries as a percentage of GDP. Hence, cost of attack divided by market cap really is the correct statistic to measure, and in the long run issuance-free PoW really does look not that good." Source: Lex Fridman (Jun 2021)

Vitalik Buterin explains why proof-of-stake is more secure than proof-of-work “I think proof of stake is very secure because to attack the system, you need to have basically as much stake as the rest of the network. Right now, for example, we have 5 million ETH staking, which means you have to come up with 5 million ETH and then join the network.” At the time of this writing, more than 37 million ETH are being staked, with 3 million ETH waiting to join via the validator queue. At today’s prices, that’s more than $80 billion of ETH someone would have to acquire to attack the network and revert finalized blocks, which is more than the cost of attacking even the Bitcoin network by some estimates. The other defense mechanism that proof-of-stake has that proof-of-work doesn’t is slashing, which makes Ethereum antifragile. Vitalik explains: “Recovering from attacks is much easier in proof-of-stake than proof-of-work. For many kinds of attacks you do against [the Ethereum] network, we have this concept of automatic slashing. In order to revert a finalized block, you basically have to have a big portion of your validators sign two conflicting messages. This is something where once these messages are on the network, you can go and prove ‘these people did it.’ So we have this feature in the protocol where you basically take all these people who provably misbehaved and you burn their coins.” Vitalik also acknowledges the possibility of censoring attacks, where if 1/3rd of validators refuse to attest, the chain can’t finalize. But, as he explains, Ethereum has a contingency plan for this as well: “Everyone who got censored would create a minority chain, and the community would have to do a soft fork. The would have to say, ‘this chain is clearly attacking us and this one is not attacking us, so we’re going to join this chain.’ Then what happens is, on that new chain, the attackers also lose a lot of coins. The difference between proof-of-stake and proof-of-work is that in a proof-of-stake system, you can identify specific participants — and this isn’t a human going in and saying ‘I don’t like you’. It’s all automated.” One last benefit of proof-of-stake is that security scales with the value of the network. As Vitalik put it five years ago, it is really relative security, and not absolute security, that matters: “The security needs of a thing have to be proportional to the size of that thing, because as a thing gets bigger, its enemies become bigger and more well-motivated. If BTC were 100x as big as it is today, the value from destroying it would be 100x higher, and the kinds of actors that would want to care about destroying it would be much bigger and scarier. This is also why countries of all sizes have roughly similarly sized militaries as a percentage of GDP. Hence, cost of attack divided by market cap really is the correct statistic to measure, and in the long run issuance-free PoW really does look not that good." Source: Lex Fridman (Jun 2021)

Etherealize

102,091 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten

The most definitive proof I have seen that if you think you can beat an NBA player in 1 on 1 then you’re out of your mind

The most definitive proof I have seen that if you think you can beat an NBA player in 1 on 1 then you’re out of your mind

Let’s Talk Knicks (LTK)

3,178,841 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

"Essentially what we're saying is, don't trust us, you can verify it," Connor Snitker, Principal Engineer, GoDaddy The point of anchoring transparency logs to a decentralized ledger is simple: no one should have to trust a single provider’s word. They can verify it.

"Essentially what we're saying is, don't trust us, you can verify it," Connor Snitker, Principal Engineer, GoDaddy The point of anchoring transparency logs to a decentralized ledger is simple: no one should have to trust a single provider’s word. They can verify it.

HOL

1,220,462 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

Rick Rubin’s fishing metaphor: This is the sign of a true professional. He doesn't sit around waiting for inspiration to come— he goes to the studio rigidly, every day, ready to work, knowing that it will be there for him when he calls on it. “It's like fishing. You can go out and spend the whole day fishing and not catch any fish. You can work for a day or for a week and nothing good can happen. That happens. It's out of our control.” You have to trust the process. You have to keep showing up.

Rick Rubin’s fishing metaphor: This is the sign of a true professional. He doesn't sit around waiting for inspiration to come— he goes to the studio rigidly, every day, ready to work, knowing that it will be there for him when he calls on it. “It's like fishing. You can go out and spend the whole day fishing and not catch any fish. You can work for a day or for a week and nothing good can happen. That happens. It's out of our control.” You have to trust the process. You have to keep showing up.

David Senra

75,963 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

It's time to go on a Quest! Our Ledger x PayPal Quest is now available. If you hold $5 worth of $PYUSD, $MATIC, or $APE, you can learn about the PayPal stablecoin, earn a proof-of-knowledge NFT & get the chance to win a custom PayPal Ledger Nano! 👉

It's time to go on a Quest! Our Ledger x PayPal Quest is now available. If you hold $5 worth of $PYUSD, $MATIC, or $APE, you can learn about the PayPal stablecoin, earn a proof-of-knowledge NFT & get the chance to win a custom PayPal Ledger Nano! 👉

Ledger

178,774 Aufrufe • vor 2 Jahren

Axiom Math's Carina Hong on why verification isn't about catching mistakes, it's how you drive the cost of a proof to zero: "Formal verification is going to make your life slightly better if you're facing a proof with one million lines. Remember the Erdős unit distance problem, the chain of thought being generated? There are actual mathematicians trying to follow it step by step and scrutinize it. That seems very difficult if you're not in that very niche domain of discrete geometry intersecting with algebraic number theory." "But if you have a Lean proof accompanying it, you can just run it. And running the Lean proof gives you that provable guarantee that this proof is sound." "I have a hot take. People think Lean is this library built on the existing Mathlib. I think it's going to grow significantly. A lot of the hurdles where Lean is difficult is that the basic definitions of some mathematical fields are just not in the library." "My hot take is the scaling law, if you go down the formal mathematics path, is going to be a lot steeper than informal mathematics. So it's not just for verification, for trust, it's also for performance, it's also for optimal generation." "Verification is not like insurance. It's not something where, oh, we want to make sure there's no flaw. That's great, but it also helps you generate mathematics, both proofs and conjectures and theories, a lot better." "So imagine the cost of proof goes to zero. Then you can massage the problem statements, and even if it's an open problem, a lot more easily, flexibly, and adaptively." Carina Hong Axiom

Axiom Math's Carina Hong on why verification isn't about catching mistakes, it's how you drive the cost of a proof to zero: "Formal verification is going to make your life slightly better if you're facing a proof with one million lines. Remember the Erdős unit distance problem, the chain of thought being generated? There are actual mathematicians trying to follow it step by step and scrutinize it. That seems very difficult if you're not in that very niche domain of discrete geometry intersecting with algebraic number theory." "But if you have a Lean proof accompanying it, you can just run it. And running the Lean proof gives you that provable guarantee that this proof is sound." "I have a hot take. People think Lean is this library built on the existing Mathlib. I think it's going to grow significantly. A lot of the hurdles where Lean is difficult is that the basic definitions of some mathematical fields are just not in the library." "My hot take is the scaling law, if you go down the formal mathematics path, is going to be a lot steeper than informal mathematics. So it's not just for verification, for trust, it's also for performance, it's also for optimal generation." "Verification is not like insurance. It's not something where, oh, we want to make sure there's no flaw. That's great, but it also helps you generate mathematics, both proofs and conjectures and theories, a lot better." "So imagine the cost of proof goes to zero. Then you can massage the problem statements, and even if it's an open problem, a lot more easily, flexibly, and adaptively." Carina Hong Axiom

MTS

13,248 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

How the Liquidity Pools and Farm work together to create a good Swap experience on Metal X and how you can earn fees and rewards by using both! Deposit to Pools → Stake in Farm → Harvest Rewards.

How the Liquidity Pools and Farm work together to create a good Swap experience on Metal X and how you can earn fees and rewards by using both! Deposit to Pools → Stake in Farm → Harvest Rewards.

Paul Grey

12,702 Aufrufe • vor 11 Monaten

Andrej Karpathy on autoresearch with an untrusted pool of workers: "My designs that incorporate an untrusted pool of workers (into autoresearch) actually look a little bit like a blockchain. Instead of blocks, you have commits, and these commits can build on each other and contain changes to the code as you're improving it. The proof of work is basically doing tons of experimentation to find the commits that work." The idea that distributed & permissionless autoresearch ~= proof-of-useful-work remains a high-level intuition for now, but it is extremely intriguing to say the least. Someone needs to take this further. See QT for more on what's missing.

Andrej Karpathy on autoresearch with an untrusted pool of workers: "My designs that incorporate an untrusted pool of workers (into autoresearch) actually look a little bit like a blockchain. Instead of blocks, you have commits, and these commits can build on each other and contain changes to the code as you're improving it. The proof of work is basically doing tons of experimentation to find the commits that work." The idea that distributed & permissionless autoresearch ~= proof-of-useful-work remains a high-level intuition for now, but it is extremely intriguing to say the least. Someone needs to take this further. See QT for more on what's missing.

Wei Dai

614,514 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten

We're nearing 75% of our 65M $FXRP target. This on-chain collateral is the proof institutions need, they can verify the foundation themselves. Retail is building the foundation. Institutions are watching, waiting for their moment to enter.

We're nearing 75% of our 65M $FXRP target. This on-chain collateral is the proof institutions need, they can verify the foundation themselves. Retail is building the foundation. Institutions are watching, waiting for their moment to enter.

Firelight

34,953 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten

Unboxing final proof for Mint+Print. It’s going to work. Covers for Frankenstein are already in production so we can turn it all on very soon and see what happens… Be sure you have one of you want in on the test! Book.io Stuff.io

Unboxing final proof for Mint+Print. It’s going to work. Covers for Frankenstein are already in production so we can turn it all on very soon and see what happens… Be sure you have one of you want in on the test! Book.io Stuff.io

JOSHU₳

10,427 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

“In the biggest moments, you can depend on him the most.” Tom Brady says this NFL QB reminds him most of himself because of the habits and work ethic that it takes to win.

“In the biggest moments, you can depend on him the most.” Tom Brady says this NFL QB reminds him most of himself because of the habits and work ethic that it takes to win.

The Joel Klatt Show: A College Football on FOX Pod

135,475 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

If you are even a small $SKR token holder, we have a Proof-of-Stake-Plus model made just for you. Read here to learn how it enables you to influence the protocol's evolution: Or watch the video with Jack Vinijtrongjit 👇

If you are even a small $SKR token holder, we have a Proof-of-Stake-Plus model made just for you. Read here to learn how it enables you to influence the protocol's evolution: Or watch the video with Jack Vinijtrongjit 👇

Saakuru Protocol 👾

133,312 Aufrufe • vor 2 Jahren