Video yükleniyor...

Video Yüklenemedi

Ana Sayfaya Dön

On the A321neo, the flare law does not include automatic compensation for thrust-related pitching moments. This applies whether it's the nose-down tendency that occurs when thrust is reduced to idle, or the nose-up tendency that can result from selecting TOGA thrust. Below 100 feet radio altitude (when flare mode...

65,475 görüntüleme • 7 ay önce •via X (Twitter)

0 Yorum

Yorum bulunmuyor

Orijinal gönderinin yorumları burada görünecek

Benzer Videolar

Luxon butchering Te Reo before he launches into one of his woke progressive speeches is like hearing the pop and hiss of cracking open a can of Bud Light. Cam Slater has written today that the Nats are helicoptering in Paula Bennet to stab him from the front while his MP’s pat him on the back - in order to feel where to stick their knives. Luxon’s pathetic political career is coming to an end, so how about a retrospective ? “Chris Luxon this is your life !” Everyone with half a brain knew what he was going to be like. Did those who voted for him watch his maiden speech? Here it is if you missed it May 24th 2021. It’s truly a speech that perhaps only Ardern herself would be so cynical to deliver with a straight face. Here’s the break down of the 4 minute speech. * Tay Rayo introduction * Diversity pitch * Immigration pitch * Diversity pitch * Climate change pitch * Globalism pitch * Air NZ career pitch * Globalism Pitch * Diversity pitch * Critical race theory pitch * Gender ideology pitch * Diversity pitch * Rainbow tick pitch * Getting things done pitch * Getting things done pitch * Diversity pitch * Getting diversity done pitch * voters will get what they deserve pitch So who remembers this speech? And yes it was THIS BAD, no joke. Maybe everyone who voted National was just so keen to dump Labour they fooled themselves that Luxon was the panacea? Also Trump rising from the ashes has put the spot light on a diminutive man with an even smaller appreciation of what the average sane kiwi wants. They can change him out, for a cosmetic attempt at pivoting but that party will never change - at the core of its fundamental philosophy is - woke nothingisim.

Holyhekatuiteka

11,074 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce

The MD-11 has always had a critical design flaw. It was manageable until someone screwed up. To improve fuel efficiency and range, its horizontal stabilizer was made smaller than those of earlier DC-10 variants. While the design delivered performance benefits, it also reduced the aircraft's natural pitch stability, particularly at slower speeds during approach and landing. To help compensate, the MD-11 relied heavily on computerized stability augmentation systems. Many crews also preferred flying slightly faster approaches, which improved pitch stability but could make the aircraft more challenging to manage during touchdown due to its weight and sensitivity in roll and yaw. These characteristics became evident in several high-profile accidents. In 1997, a FedEx MD-11 arriving at Newark was reportedly operating under the belief that runway length was limited, prompting the crew to aim for an immediate touchdown. The aircraft landed hard, bounced, and became unstable. Instead of executing a go-around, attempts to salvage the landing resulted in another severe impact, collapsing the landing gear and destroying the aircraft in a post-crash fire. All five crew members survived. The accident highlighted a key lesson: when an MD-11 bounced significantly after touchdown, a go-around was often the safest option. That lesson resurfaced in tragic fashion in 2009 at Narita, Japan. During strong and gusty crosswinds, a FedEx MD-11 touched down hard and bounced. Believing the aircraft could still be recovered onto the runway, the crew attempted to continue the landing. The resulting control inputs led to an even harder impact, loss of control, and a crash that destroyed the aircraft and claimed the lives of both pilots. 📹: buybygb

Turbine Traveller

206,274 görüntüleme • 2 ay önce

🚨WHOA!!! Gravity Just Got Outmatched… Watch a C-17 Drop Out of the Sky Using Reverse Thrust Most people think giant cargo aircraft descend slowly in wide lazy circles. Not the American 🇺🇸 C-17. What you’re seeing in this footage is one of the most aggressive controlled descents ever engineered into a military aircraft. The C-17 Globemaster can actually deploy thrust reversers while still in the air… something almost no other jet transport can safely do. When those massive engines flip into reverse thrust, the physics of the aircraft changes instantly. Instead of the engines pushing the aircraft forward… they begin fighting the forward motion of the airplane. The result is dramatic. The aircraft can transition from flying nearly parallel to the horizon… to a steep nose-down descent that looks almost perpendicular compared to the Earth below. Pilots can drop altitude incredibly fast… going from high cruising altitude to landing approach in just a couple minutes. Why does this matter? Because the C-17 was built for battlefield logistics. It was designed to fly into dangerous airspace, descend rapidly to avoid threats, land on short or rough runways, unload equipment or troops, and get back into the air before anyone has time to react. That rapid descent capability allows the aircraft to minimize time exposed to enemy radar or missile threats. The moment the thrust reversers are disengaged, the aircraft stabilizes instantly and transitions back into normal controlled flight for landing. It’s a perfect example of American aerospace engineering. Four massive turbofan engines… flight computers… and aerodynamics working together to make a 585,000-pound aircraft move like a precision instrument in the sky. For people who have never seen reverse thrust used mid-air before… this footage is a rare look at how military airlift aircraft operate when seconds matter. It’s one of the coolest demonstrations of aviation physics you’ll ever see. #SilentMajoritySpeaks #AStoneGroove

A Gene Robinson

1,045,647 görüntüleme • 5 ay önce