Загрузка видео...
Не удалось загрузить видео
On this week’s UpFront Marc Lamont Hill challenges Danny Ayalon on whether Israel’s actions in Gaza constitute collective punishment, a crime under international law. Watch full show that also includes interview w/ Hamas Senior Spokesperson Osama Hamdan:
205,659 просмотров • 2 лет назад •via X (Twitter)
Комментарии: 10
@marclamonthill @DannyAyalon Thank you for your excellent program. I have watched and made a Japanese abstract here.
@marclamonthill @DannyAyalon Thanks aljazerra for countering the negative that is being peddled by the west that seems to think that only iraseli lives matter all lives matter Arab and Jews . Stop the fighting and find diplomatic channels to end this forever war
@marclamonthill @DannyAyalon Well done @marclamonthill . This is real journalism!
@marclamonthill @DannyAyalon I heard the Israeli say the Palestinians can return once Hamas is eradicated. I wonder who will rebuild Gaza for them when they return? Israel? Didnt they destroy the homes of settlers when they left Gaza?
@marclamonthill @DannyAyalon They won't stop until they have dispossessed palestians of all their land .
@marclamonthill @DannyAyalon Great interview 👏
@marclamonthill @DannyAyalon Salute my brother @marclamonthill Great job!
@marclamonthill @DannyAyalon Bro this is the type of upfront representation we need at every legislative session throughout America. How can we bring this frequency to the Black Community my Brother? If our political action committees engaged the issues that impact us like this we wouldn't need reparations.
@marclamonthill @DannyAyalon The people of Palestine should protests that Hamas should surrender and come out with their hands on their heads so that Israel can stop the invasion. Secondly, release all hostages . This is the first phase to establish peace.Otherwise, all the destruction of Gaza is justified
@marclamonthill @DannyAyalon He went in on this interview
![🟩The latest Pod Save America episode features the hosts forcefully condemning Israel’s starvation siege and assault on Gaza, describing the mass killing and widespread hunger with clarity. Yet even as the conversation on the conflict evolves, political analysts continue to portray Hamas as a singular evil—a “monster”—without addressing the political and material conditions shaping the movement’s stance, most critically the question of why it refuses to disarm. Senior Palestinian resistance leaders have consistently told Drop Site News that disarmament under occupation would amount to total abandonment of the Palestinian struggle for self-determination. It would clear the path for full-scale ethnic cleansing. That’s why, after rejecting the Witkoff proposal in April, a senior Hamas official told the BBC that disarmament remains “a million red lines”: “The Israeli proposal … called for the disarmament of Hamas without any Israeli commitment to end the war or withdraw from Gaza. Hamas therefore rejected the offer in its entirety.” Senior Hamas official Osama Hamdan expanded on this in a May interview with Jeremy Scahill: “We are a people under occupation. We are not fighting because we like to fight. Even if a Muslim came to occupy my land, I would fight him. It’s not about religion—it’s about occupation.” Despite reports in Israeli and some Arab media that Hamas might consider storing its weapons or handing them to a third party, Hamdan told Drop Site there have been no formal talks about such a proposal. “What about the Israeli weapons? Are they going to store their weapons, too?” said Hamdan. He stated that disarmament only follows a genuine political agreement between two parties: “Such an experience happened in Northern Ireland,” he noted. “But there was a real political arrangement, which was accepted by both sides.” Unless that happens, Hamdan said, the resistance will retain its arms until Palestinians achieve full statehood: “If there was a Palestinian state, those weapons would be handed to the Palestinian government. Even the [resistance] fighters, they will turn to be part of the army or the police of this government.” Until that day, Palestinians retain a legal right to resist illegal colonial occupation—a right codified in international law and affirmed in the UN Charter and General Assembly resolutions, which recognize the legitimacy of peoples fighting for self-determination “by all available means, including armed struggle.”](https://image.24vids.com/tw-1950325294188949621/amplify_video_thumb/1950325213939302400/img/qn9joD3hTjIW3Nby.jpg)