Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

There was a problem loading this video. This could be due to a temporary network issue or the video might be unavailable.

Once again, a deeply concerning situation has come to light. A Colonel-rank officer from the Indian Army's Regiment of Artillery tried to maintain law and order at an ECHS office, but it is alleged that some people outside the office still threatened him and said they would not let... show more

Mr BundelKhandi

6,552 subscribers

227,172 views • 17 days ago •via X (Twitter)

Health & Wellness News & Politics

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

36 Comments

SexyVinod17 days ago

@adgpi @PMOIndia @SamarWatch @ZoraSingh36079 @AmrataJoshi being an army officer is not a free pass, try to give full picture then only let people decide

Bhupendra17 days ago

@adgpi @PMOIndia @SamarWatch @ZoraSingh36079 @AmrataJoshi

Mr BundelKhandi17 days ago

@adgpi @PMOIndia @SamarWatch @ZoraSingh36079 @AmrataJoshi ye to sach main chamatkar ho gya

🄲🄾🄻🄾🄽🄴🄻 🄱🄾🄶🄴🅈17 days ago

It's a sad state of affairs: what motivation and inspiration are we giving to younger generations to join the Armed Forces? These people don't dare to speak with a constable of the police like this. Men in olive uniforms are being taken for a ride in every domain. If these are ESM pause their ECHS card for some time till the time of inquiry is complete, that much our higher-ups do to give a firm msg.

Mr BundelKhandi17 days ago

@PMOIndia @SamarWatch @ZoraSingh36079 @AmrataJoshi Part-II

Anand17 days ago

@adgpi @PMOIndia @SamarWatch @ZoraSingh36079 @AmrataJoshi ECHS is nothing but a tool for siphoning of public money.

Mr BundelKhandi17 days ago

@PMOIndia @SamarWatch @ZoraSingh36079 @AmrataJoshi Part-III

साहिल लोहचब17 days ago

@adgpi @PMOIndia @SamarWatch @ZoraSingh36079 @AmrataJoshi Our generation has never seen war and this is the reason why the value and respect of a soldier is not the same anymore.

Shailendra Singh Gour17 days ago

@adgpi @PMOIndia @SamarWatch @ZoraSingh36079 @AmrataJoshi Just do your work Army is not supreme

Bhupendra17 days ago

@adgpi @PMOIndia @SamarWatch @ZoraSingh36079 @AmrataJoshi

Mr BundelKhandi17 days ago

@adgpi @PMOIndia @SamarWatch @ZoraSingh36079 @AmrataJoshi Wo Bhi white wala medicine ka case le kar bhaga hai maybe

Newsnest17 days ago

@adgpi @PMOIndia @SamarWatch @ZoraSingh36079 @AmrataJoshi Soldiers and their families deserve respect, not humiliation.

Mr BundelKhandi17 days ago

@PMOIndia @SamarWatch @ZoraSingh36079 @AmrataJoshi

Ayush Rawat17 days ago

@adgpi @PMOIndia @SamarWatch @ZoraSingh36079 @AmrataJoshi Protestors are also Ex army..

ALOK TIWARI17 days ago

@adgpi @PMOIndia @SamarWatch @ZoraSingh36079 @AmrataJoshi Every coin has 2 sides! Ex servicemen were protesting against unlawful termination/activities going in ECHS sikar. Col. can’t stop anyone from raising their voice

Juni17 days ago

@adgpi @PMOIndia @SamarWatch @ZoraSingh36079 @AmrataJoshi

Anurag17 days ago

@adgpi @PMOIndia @SamarWatch @ZoraSingh36079 @AmrataJoshi Let me refresh your memory. Its a usual practice. Atleast these people didnt beat him like they did in kerala

Ranjeet Yadav16 days ago

@adgpi @PMOIndia @SamarWatch @ZoraSingh36079 @AmrataJoshi हर जगह गुंडागर्दी शुरू कर दे रहे लोग.

Arnav_Singh14 days ago

@adgpi @PMOIndia @SamarWatch @ZoraSingh36079 @AmrataJoshi If 8 out of 10 medicines were provided, that effort should also be acknowledged. The issue of the remaining two medicines could have been resolved through calm discussion.

बजा झाड़ के17 days ago

@adgpi @PMOIndia @SamarWatch @ZoraSingh36079 @AmrataJoshi There is a scam worth approximately ₹2,000 crore involving that department; money is being pocketed under the guise of hospital in Rewari, Mahendragarh, while these empaneled hospitals are ruthlessly fleecing ex-servicemen.

Bhanu Singh17 days ago

@adgpi @PMOIndia @SamarWatch @ZoraSingh36079 @AmrataJoshi FIR must be filed for threatening an officer on duty n disturbing peace around the premises.

Khusi Ram14 days ago

@adgpi @PMOIndia @SamarWatch @ZoraSingh36079 @AmrataJoshi Stock shortages can happen in any healthcare system. Instead of arguing with the ECHS staff, it is always better to seek a solution through proper communication.

हरिश्चंद्र गेहुंआ17 days ago

@adgpi @PMOIndia @SamarWatch @ZoraSingh36079 @AmrataJoshi जब तक शक्ति नहीं होगी यह तमाशा होता रहेगा।।

The Crypt17 days ago

@adgpi @PMOIndia @SamarWatch @ZoraSingh36079 @AmrataJoshi Since this is an ECHS Office, first it's to be ascertained if the troublemakers were civilians. In any case, disrespect of, and any impediment to an Army officer's duty must be subject to strict action, imo.

RKR17 days ago

@adgpi @PMOIndia @SamarWatch @ZoraSingh36079 @AmrataJoshi Army should not disrespect the public and should not be any impediment also. Mutual respect is the way. Ex servicemen must be respected also

Uday Mehra17 days ago

@adgpi @PMOIndia @SamarWatch @ZoraSingh36079 @AmrataJoshi He should have a gun to defend himself.

Aarohi Tiwari17 days ago

@adgpi @PMOIndia @SamarWatch @ZoraSingh36079 @AmrataJoshi @adgpi look at this

Bupinder17 days ago

@adgpi @PMOIndia @SamarWatch @ZoraSingh36079 @AmrataJoshi @adgpi इस पूरे मामले की तथ्यात्मक और निष्पक्ष जांच होनी चाहिए।

Diplu16 days ago

@adgpi @PMOIndia @SamarWatch @ZoraSingh36079 @AmrataJoshi These goons should be taken to task

Muna Ji17 days ago

@adgpi @PMOIndia @SamarWatch @ZoraSingh36079 @AmrataJoshi आर्मी के ऑफिसर की वजह से जवान नौकरी छोडता है , आत्महत्या करता है क्योंकि ऑफिसर चोर ,मक्कार, धोखेबाज होता है ईसके उपर कानून कारवाई होना चाहिए । 10% को छोरकर सारे सेना के अधिकारी भ्रष्ट होता है।

KarthiK🚩🚩🇮🇳🇮🇳🇮🇳🇮🇳17 days ago

@adgpi @PMOIndia @SamarWatch @ZoraSingh36079 @AmrataJoshi 🤬🤬🤬🤬🤬🤬🤬

GHOST OPERATORS17 days ago

@adgpi @PMOIndia @SamarWatch @ZoraSingh36079 @AmrataJoshi @grok kya matter hai

बजा झाड़ के17 days ago

@adgpi @PMOIndia @SamarWatch @ZoraSingh36079 @AmrataJoshi Today, a single individual often runs multiple hospitals. A thorough investigation must be conducted into all ECHS hospitals in these two Haryana districts to determine exactly how much money has been claimed.

Mr BundelKhandi17 days ago

@PMOIndia @SamarWatch @ZoraSingh36079 @AmrataJoshi

Simran Prasang singh17 days ago

@adgpi @PMOIndia @SamarWatch @ZoraSingh36079 @AmrataJoshi Threatening a serving Colonel in broad daylight proves how completely lawlessness has overridden basic respect for state institutions.

mahesh upasani17 days ago

@adgpi @PMOIndia @SamarWatch @ZoraSingh36079 @AmrataJoshi कुछ तो कारण होगा, कोई यूं ही बेवफा नहीं होता

Related Videos

In a sane country..every officer performing his duty is suppose to wear a body cam while doing any form of activity concerning his job.. Recording an officer is not something that is wanted..it is needed..it’s of necessity 📌 An officer of the law is a human and humans can lie..a lot of men are in prison today because of what an officer did to frame him up..but yall won’t see it from that angle because officers are meant to be seen as gods 🤦‍♂️ I have being recording even before this law was passed on because it’s my right to record what’s going on around me..you are the one with the gun..I’m suppose to be afraid. So guys..once you are stopped by an officer kindly record for your own safety 📌

In a sane country..every officer performing his duty is suppose to wear a body cam while doing any form of activity concerning his job.. Recording an officer is not something that is wanted..it is needed..it’s of necessity 📌 An officer of the law is a human and humans can lie..a lot of men are in prison today because of what an officer did to frame him up..but yall won’t see it from that angle because officers are meant to be seen as gods 🤦‍♂️ I have being recording even before this law was passed on because it’s my right to record what’s going on around me..you are the one with the gun..I’m suppose to be afraid. So guys..once you are stopped by an officer kindly record for your own safety 📌

Aluya_pov

11,789 views • 4 months ago

If anyone knows who this auditor is, please tag him or let me know for credit. He did exactly what more people should be doing. 👏👏👏 He questioned a female police officer about two migrants impersonating security officers at a migrant hotel. No badges. No licenses. Plus they were dealing with members of the public. But the police officer didn’t seem interested. She wasn’t willing to challenge them properly or stop it on the spot she seemed content to leave it to the hotel. How is that acceptable? Public safety matters. If someone is impersonating security, the police should be dealing with it properly, not passing the buck.

If anyone knows who this auditor is, please tag him or let me know for credit. He did exactly what more people should be doing. 👏👏👏 He questioned a female police officer about two migrants impersonating security officers at a migrant hotel. No badges. No licenses. Plus they were dealing with members of the public. But the police officer didn’t seem interested. She wasn’t willing to challenge them properly or stop it on the spot she seemed content to leave it to the hotel. How is that acceptable? Public safety matters. If someone is impersonating security, the police should be dealing with it properly, not passing the buck.

Benonwine

281,530 views • 2 months ago

"One of the things that I think we need to remember about impeachment is that it is meant to shine a light on corruption—but it is also meant to shine a light leading forward to show people what our ideals are, what we expect of people who take oaths of office to the Constitution, who commit to operate under a system of laws and to operate or do their jobs under the law in the best interest of the American people. And that I think is a potential cathartic effect of what would be obviously a major constitutional crisis of impeaching and removing a presidential administration."

"One of the things that I think we need to remember about impeachment is that it is meant to shine a light on corruption—but it is also meant to shine a light leading forward to show people what our ideals are, what we expect of people who take oaths of office to the Constitution, who commit to operate under a system of laws and to operate or do their jobs under the law in the best interest of the American people. And that I think is a potential cathartic effect of what would be obviously a major constitutional crisis of impeaching and removing a presidential administration."

George Conway ⚖️🇺🇸

72,974 views • 1 month ago

This woman is at a doctor's office and witnessed a woman sitting on her son. She started filming, and you can tell something is off with her. She went to the PD, but the officer said he didn’t think the office would give out her name because of HIPAA. If this is how she treats him in public, imagine what happens at home.

This woman is at a doctor's office and witnessed a woman sitting on her son. She started filming, and you can tell something is off with her. She went to the PD, but the officer said he didn’t think the office would give out her name because of HIPAA. If this is how she treats him in public, imagine what happens at home.

Suzee Q

2,894,629 views • 4 months ago

🇩🇪🇺🇦 "After all, there is hardly a man here in Ukraine who was, AND STILL IS, closer to Zelensky than Yermak. It is also said that he still wields a great deal of power and that Zelensky still lets him call the shots, even though he is no longer officially the head of the President’s Office." — German Welt correspondent, Wanner on ex- Ukraine's Head of President’s Office, Yermak who is currently a suspect in the corruption case "It (communication with him) can certainly also be seen as a blow to Zelensky." — concludes

🇩🇪🇺🇦 "After all, there is hardly a man here in Ukraine who was, AND STILL IS, closer to Zelensky than Yermak. It is also said that he still wields a great deal of power and that Zelensky still lets him call the shots, even though he is no longer officially the head of the President’s Office." — German Welt correspondent, Wanner on ex- Ukraine's Head of President’s Office, Yermak who is currently a suspect in the corruption case "It (communication with him) can certainly also be seen as a blow to Zelensky." — concludes

Lord Bebo

40,398 views • 4 months ago

“We have an office that we are running, and it is in Area 10 (Abuja). Wike knows the office, let him come and demolish it.” - Umar Sani, a chieftain of Turaki-led PDP, alleged that the Wike-led PDP is selling nomination forms for cash, and if they are using PDP bank accounts, it will come directly to them. He added that the Wadada-led PDP BOT has custody of the PDP cooperation document, not the Wike-led PDP.

“We have an office that we are running, and it is in Area 10 (Abuja). Wike knows the office, let him come and demolish it.” - Umar Sani, a chieftain of Turaki-led PDP, alleged that the Wike-led PDP is selling nomination forms for cash, and if they are using PDP bank accounts, it will come directly to them. He added that the Wadada-led PDP BOT has custody of the PDP cooperation document, not the Wike-led PDP.

Imran Muhammad

109,526 views • 4 months ago

This dad called 911 because his seven year old autistic son wasn’t behaving and was having a tantrum. The officer that spoke with him told the father that it was completely inappropriate to call the police over this. He said they have an entire town to protect and three officers responded and then asks the dad while chuckling - “can’t handle a seven year old?” The dad tells him that he has called 911 twice before but no one has ever got mad at him like this officer. The officer tells him that they are approaching charging him with false summoning a police officer. He also tells him that if he can’t handle a seven year then maybe they should get CYS involved because clearly the dad needs parenting classes. 😳 Many said the officer was rude and didn’t have to be. That his job is to protect and SERVE the community and that the family was just reaching out, that he needed support and someone to to talk to because they have no idea how hard it is to raise an autistic child? But others said this is not a job for a police officer, that they aren’t counselors and therapists and that there are many resources available through the city that he should using. 💯 I am team police officer. Some may find it rude but this is not in their job description. And being the third time? You have to put a stop to the 911 calls. What do you think? Do you think the officer had a right to be upset and talk the way he was talking to the dad being that this is the third time this has happened? Or, do you think he should have had more compassion for the father?

This dad called 911 because his seven year old autistic son wasn’t behaving and was having a tantrum. The officer that spoke with him told the father that it was completely inappropriate to call the police over this. He said they have an entire town to protect and three officers responded and then asks the dad while chuckling - “can’t handle a seven year old?” The dad tells him that he has called 911 twice before but no one has ever got mad at him like this officer. The officer tells him that they are approaching charging him with false summoning a police officer. He also tells him that if he can’t handle a seven year then maybe they should get CYS involved because clearly the dad needs parenting classes. 😳 Many said the officer was rude and didn’t have to be. That his job is to protect and SERVE the community and that the family was just reaching out, that he needed support and someone to to talk to because they have no idea how hard it is to raise an autistic child? But others said this is not a job for a police officer, that they aren’t counselors and therapists and that there are many resources available through the city that he should using. 💯 I am team police officer. Some may find it rude but this is not in their job description. And being the third time? You have to put a stop to the 911 calls. What do you think? Do you think the officer had a right to be upset and talk the way he was talking to the dad being that this is the third time this has happened? Or, do you think he should have had more compassion for the father?

👉M-Û-R-Č-H👈

26,693 views • 3 months ago

#WATCH | Delhi: On Sambhal CO's ‘Go To Iran’ remark, Samajwadi Party MP Zia Ur Rehman Barq says, "This is a highly shameful statement, and the language being employed—coming from an officer of CO rank is utterly inappropriate. Who gave him the authority to issue threats in this manner? I would like to ask: who granted this officer the right to insult any religion? How can an officer of his stature use such language? This constitutes not merely an insult to religious freedom—the freedom of a specific faith—but is also a violation of the Police Manual. Moreover, who are you to pass judgment on foreign affairs? It is the Government of India that determines such matters; they are the ones to decide. I strongly condemn the use of such terminology. In fact, I demand that the DGP and the government to take disciplinary action against him to ensure that, in the future, no officer ever resorts to such vile language again..."

#WATCH | Delhi: On Sambhal CO's ‘Go To Iran’ remark, Samajwadi Party MP Zia Ur Rehman Barq says, "This is a highly shameful statement, and the language being employed—coming from an officer of CO rank is utterly inappropriate. Who gave him the authority to issue threats in this manner? I would like to ask: who granted this officer the right to insult any religion? How can an officer of his stature use such language? This constitutes not merely an insult to religious freedom—the freedom of a specific faith—but is also a violation of the Police Manual. Moreover, who are you to pass judgment on foreign affairs? It is the Government of India that determines such matters; they are the ones to decide. I strongly condemn the use of such terminology. In fact, I demand that the DGP and the government to take disciplinary action against him to ensure that, in the future, no officer ever resorts to such vile language again..."

ANI

28,844 views • 6 months ago

NBC’s Tom Winters with an accurate reaction from the 4pm hour to the deadly ICE-involved shooting: “I think from a law enforcement perspective, what you've heard law enforcement say is that they don't — they don't like the way that this shooting looks. And in speaking with people from law enforcement, from that part of the country, they use a phrase that is sometimes heard in law enforcement circles lawful but awful. They don't like the look of it, but from a legal perspective, it might be okay. To get specific to your question — okay, legally, I should say — to get specific to your question, this case is going to be investigated by the FBI first and foremost, because it involves a shooting — shooting by a federal law enforcement officer.”

NBC’s Tom Winters with an accurate reaction from the 4pm hour to the deadly ICE-involved shooting: “I think from a law enforcement perspective, what you've heard law enforcement say is that they don't — they don't like the way that this shooting looks. And in speaking with people from law enforcement, from that part of the country, they use a phrase that is sometimes heard in law enforcement circles lawful but awful. They don't like the look of it, but from a legal perspective, it might be okay. To get specific to your question — okay, legally, I should say — to get specific to your question, this case is going to be investigated by the FBI first and foremost, because it involves a shooting — shooting by a federal law enforcement officer.”

Curtis Houck

89,472 views • 8 months ago

An Ottawa police officer tells Chris Dacey that the pro-Palestinian crowd is going to "pound him" for filming in public Instead of dealing with the violent crowd (according to the police officer's statement), police chose to push Dacey and tell him to leave a public place

An Ottawa police officer tells Chris Dacey that the pro-Palestinian crowd is going to "pound him" for filming in public Instead of dealing with the violent crowd (according to the police officer's statement), police chose to push Dacey and tell him to leave a public place

Jon Villeneuve

187,884 views • 1 year ago

6 Immigration officers were interdicted for gross insurbordination towards a senior officer in the rank of DCOI. It was said that officer was on board a vehicle, and on reaching an Immigration check point, the officer who is a muslim, alighted and went and urinated near a mosque, and that resulted in an altercation between him and officers on duty.

6 Immigration officers were interdicted for gross insurbordination towards a senior officer in the rank of DCOI. It was said that officer was on board a vehicle, and on reaching an Immigration check point, the officer who is a muslim, alighted and went and urinated near a mosque, and that resulted in an altercation between him and officers on duty.

Elorm 🥷🏿

187,829 views • 9 months ago

Tuberville: First of all the argument from some of the senators was we do not want to compensate people that laid a hand on a policeman or law enforcement officer. Blanche said this is not going to happen. We are going to compensate people who were wrongly denied access to a lawyer….

Tuberville: First of all the argument from some of the senators was we do not want to compensate people that laid a hand on a policeman or law enforcement officer. Blanche said this is not going to happen. We are going to compensate people who were wrongly denied access to a lawyer….

Acyn

188,007 views • 3 months ago

Marco Rubio on Venezuela: Our desire and our goal here is not to create a permanent system where the current system simply becomes permanent. What we all want, and what we have insisted on and been very clear about, is that at the end of the day, the moment has to come when Venezuela is governed by a democratically elected government. But remember, democracy — a republic — is not just about holding an election. An election is obviously key, but that election has to be a valid election. And when that government takes office, we do not want it to inherit an economic disaster or a country in complete crisis. We want it to inherit a country that is stabilized and that, although it will obviously continue to have problems, is no longer in a situation of crisis.

Marco Rubio on Venezuela: Our desire and our goal here is not to create a permanent system where the current system simply becomes permanent. What we all want, and what we have insisted on and been very clear about, is that at the end of the day, the moment has to come when Venezuela is governed by a democratically elected government. But remember, democracy — a republic — is not just about holding an election. An election is obviously key, but that election has to be a valid election. And when that government takes office, we do not want it to inherit an economic disaster or a country in complete crisis. We want it to inherit a country that is stabilized and that, although it will obviously continue to have problems, is no longer in a situation of crisis.

Clash Report

19,756 views • 17 days ago

Yes on the videos we have so far. The initial encounter was him filming them. There was no gun being brandished. They jumped out of vehicles to go to try to intimidate him. Unfortunately there's no video yet between then and when they had them on the ground. When they had him on the ground they were pistol whipping him, at first it looked like a baton, but it's actually a gun. They had him down with at least five officers. You got to wait for a second so he tried to stand up they shot him in the back he was motionless after they shot him in the back. Then there were four more shots or more after that unloaded into his body from a posture of standing above him. Not a defensive posture. He's supposedly has a gun. It looks like ICE took something out of a holster. So it's likely that he did have a HOLSTERED GUN in an open carry state that is not a reason to shoot someone to death. He was not brandishing it -- again it was his camera. That was the reason for the initial approach was to intimidate him about his camera. It is perfectly legal to film ice This is out not murder once again. Now there is some sort of speculation on social that a gun was dropped and a bullet went off. That would be the ICE AGENTS who took the gun out of his holster. I'll post some videos for people to see in the order that they happened.

Yes on the videos we have so far. The initial encounter was him filming them. There was no gun being brandished. They jumped out of vehicles to go to try to intimidate him. Unfortunately there's no video yet between then and when they had them on the ground. When they had him on the ground they were pistol whipping him, at first it looked like a baton, but it's actually a gun. They had him down with at least five officers. You got to wait for a second so he tried to stand up they shot him in the back he was motionless after they shot him in the back. Then there were four more shots or more after that unloaded into his body from a posture of standing above him. Not a defensive posture. He's supposedly has a gun. It looks like ICE took something out of a holster. So it's likely that he did have a HOLSTERED GUN in an open carry state that is not a reason to shoot someone to death. He was not brandishing it -- again it was his camera. That was the reason for the initial approach was to intimidate him about his camera. It is perfectly legal to film ice This is out not murder once again. Now there is some sort of speculation on social that a gun was dropped and a bullet went off. That would be the ICE AGENTS who took the gun out of his holster. I'll post some videos for people to see in the order that they happened.

Kristine (@schachin on Threads) 🇺🇦

23,566 views • 7 months ago

Brennan: "You do not have the American public on your side. Does that concern you?" Noem: "This individual weaponized her car and threatened the life of a law enforcement officer and those around him. And that is what the media needs to cover."

Brennan: "You do not have the American public on your side. Does that concern you?" Noem: "This individual weaponized her car and threatened the life of a law enforcement officer and those around him. And that is what the media needs to cover."

The Bulwark

78,341 views • 8 months ago

A police officer carries enormous power. The power to stop, search, arrest, detain, investigate and, in some cases, use force. That power must always come with responsibility. It is therefore deeply disturbing that many police officers in Kenya continue to hide their names and service numbers while carrying out their duties. This is not only wrong, it is a direct violation of the law. The National Police Service Act No. 11A of 2011 is clear. Paragraph A10 states: "A Police officer in uniform shall at all times affix a nametag or identifiable Service number in a clearly visible part of the uniform." The law does not say "sometimes." It does not say "when convenient." It says at all times. Why would an officer conceal their identity from the public they are sworn to serve? An honest officer should have no fear of being identified. A professional officer should proudly wear their name and service number. It is the rogue officer, the corrupt officer and the abusive officer who benefits from anonymity. When citizens cannot identify officers, complaints become impossible. Accountability disappears. Justice is obstructed. Public trust is destroyed. The Inspector General knows this problem exists. The National Police Service Commission knows it exists. Human rights organizations have repeatedly raised concerns about it. Yet little meaningful action has been taken. A police uniform should never become a mask behind which misconduct is hidden. The question Kenyans must ask is simple: Are we being policed by accountable public servants, or by individuals who deliberately conceal their identities while exercising state power? No police officer should be above the law. The first duty of law enforcement is to obey the law. Every officer must wear a visible name tag and service number.

A police officer carries enormous power. The power to stop, search, arrest, detain, investigate and, in some cases, use force. That power must always come with responsibility. It is therefore deeply disturbing that many police officers in Kenya continue to hide their names and service numbers while carrying out their duties. This is not only wrong, it is a direct violation of the law. The National Police Service Act No. 11A of 2011 is clear. Paragraph A10 states: "A Police officer in uniform shall at all times affix a nametag or identifiable Service number in a clearly visible part of the uniform." The law does not say "sometimes." It does not say "when convenient." It says at all times. Why would an officer conceal their identity from the public they are sworn to serve? An honest officer should have no fear of being identified. A professional officer should proudly wear their name and service number. It is the rogue officer, the corrupt officer and the abusive officer who benefits from anonymity. When citizens cannot identify officers, complaints become impossible. Accountability disappears. Justice is obstructed. Public trust is destroyed. The Inspector General knows this problem exists. The National Police Service Commission knows it exists. Human rights organizations have repeatedly raised concerns about it. Yet little meaningful action has been taken. A police uniform should never become a mask behind which misconduct is hidden. The question Kenyans must ask is simple: Are we being policed by accountable public servants, or by individuals who deliberately conceal their identities while exercising state power? No police officer should be above the law. The first duty of law enforcement is to obey the law. Every officer must wear a visible name tag and service number.

𝙋𝘼𝙐𝙇. 𝐎. 𝐍𝐄𝐊𝐎

37,449 views • 3 months ago

#WATCH | Imphal, Manipur: On the arson incident at Kanto Sabal village, Imphal West, Congress MP Angomcha Bimol Akoijam said, “I have seen the video and the people were complaining right in front of them (Security Forces) … I tried to talk to the officers, and they didn't even have the basic etiquette of responding. I saw that kind of attitude and think about what they have done to the people, and even an MP like me, some problem is there with that unit. I think that the Indian army as an organisation can't be blamed, as there will always be rotten elements in an organisation, and I think I am hugely disappointed… My office called the commanding officer; he said he would return the call, but he did not, and they have been saying that the captain is coming. I was waiting for him; he didn't turn up. This is the first time I am encountering something like this… I came to know from the village that this is the sixth time it has happened, and gets rarely reported… At the beginning of the crisis, this commanding officer used to call both the Kuki civil society and Meiteis in and around that place, and they used to have regular conversations to maintain peace... The fact of the matter remains that four houses were burned down right there when they were standing. When their unit is there, though they should be held responsible… The army commander was supposed to respond in public order situations without asking the civil authority… If the armies are deployed all along, how come those people were allowed to escape? I know there are a lot of questions we must ask. And who gave permission for the rally till that problem? In that situation, did they have any intelligence input about possible violence? Did they have enough deployment on the ground? How did that houses were allowed to be burned? It is a shame for such an organisation like the Indian Army … I am collecting information from there and what happened with the videos and other… The leadership quality of the Indian Army is appreciated across the globe, but that character that we know about the Indian Army, I didn't see it yesterday…” (12.07)

#WATCH | Imphal, Manipur: On the arson incident at Kanto Sabal village, Imphal West, Congress MP Angomcha Bimol Akoijam said, “I have seen the video and the people were complaining right in front of them (Security Forces) … I tried to talk to the officers, and they didn't even have the basic etiquette of responding. I saw that kind of attitude and think about what they have done to the people, and even an MP like me, some problem is there with that unit. I think that the Indian army as an organisation can't be blamed, as there will always be rotten elements in an organisation, and I think I am hugely disappointed… My office called the commanding officer; he said he would return the call, but he did not, and they have been saying that the captain is coming. I was waiting for him; he didn't turn up. This is the first time I am encountering something like this… I came to know from the village that this is the sixth time it has happened, and gets rarely reported… At the beginning of the crisis, this commanding officer used to call both the Kuki civil society and Meiteis in and around that place, and they used to have regular conversations to maintain peace... The fact of the matter remains that four houses were burned down right there when they were standing. When their unit is there, though they should be held responsible… The army commander was supposed to respond in public order situations without asking the civil authority… If the armies are deployed all along, how come those people were allowed to escape? I know there are a lot of questions we must ask. And who gave permission for the rally till that problem? In that situation, did they have any intelligence input about possible violence? Did they have enough deployment on the ground? How did that houses were allowed to be burned? It is a shame for such an organisation like the Indian Army … I am collecting information from there and what happened with the videos and other… The leadership quality of the Indian Army is appreciated across the globe, but that character that we know about the Indian Army, I didn't see it yesterday…” (12.07)

ANI

27,133 views • 2 months ago

He’s filming everyone at the market, but the police say there’s nothing they can do. Whose side are you on? A male videographer (the "auditor"), who is wearing a disguise for anonymity, is filming at an outdoor market. He is confronted by a market organizer (Kaylee Dolan) regarding his filming of vendors and attendees. A law enforcement officer arrives to mediate the dispute. The organizer expresses concern that the videographer is making vendors and patrons uncomfortable and asks him to stop or leave. The videographer asserts his right to film in a public area, refusing to comply with her request. The responding officer confirms that the videographer is in a public space where he has a legal right to record. The officer acknowledges the organizer's frustration but explains that, as no crime is being committed, he cannot compel the man to stop filming or force him to leave. The tension arises from the intersection of constitutional rights and personal expectations of privacy. Under the First Amendment of the U.S. Constitution, individuals generally have a protected right to film in public spaces (such as sidewalks, public parks, and plazas). This includes the right to film government officials and police officers performing their duties, as well as things that are plainly visible from those public areas. In general, there is no "reasonable expectation of privacy" in a public space. If something can be seen by the naked eye from a location where a person is legally permitted to be, it is typically legal to photograph or record it. While filming is a protected activity, it is not absolute. If filming crosses the line into harassment, stalking, or disorderly conduct—or if it is done to "clandestinely" capture private or intimate areas, it can become illegal. In this specific interaction, the officer determined that the videographer’s actions did not meet the legal threshold for a crime, which is why he could not intervene. If the market were held on private property rather than public land, the owners or organizers would have the right to set rules regarding photography or to ask people to leave. If someone refuses to leave private property after being asked, they can be cited for trespassing. The officer's inability to remove the videographer suggests that the location was either public property or that the organizer lacked the legal authority to exclude him from that specific area.

He’s filming everyone at the market, but the police say there’s nothing they can do. Whose side are you on? A male videographer (the "auditor"), who is wearing a disguise for anonymity, is filming at an outdoor market. He is confronted by a market organizer (Kaylee Dolan) regarding his filming of vendors and attendees. A law enforcement officer arrives to mediate the dispute. The organizer expresses concern that the videographer is making vendors and patrons uncomfortable and asks him to stop or leave. The videographer asserts his right to film in a public area, refusing to comply with her request. The responding officer confirms that the videographer is in a public space where he has a legal right to record. The officer acknowledges the organizer's frustration but explains that, as no crime is being committed, he cannot compel the man to stop filming or force him to leave. The tension arises from the intersection of constitutional rights and personal expectations of privacy. Under the First Amendment of the U.S. Constitution, individuals generally have a protected right to film in public spaces (such as sidewalks, public parks, and plazas). This includes the right to film government officials and police officers performing their duties, as well as things that are plainly visible from those public areas. In general, there is no "reasonable expectation of privacy" in a public space. If something can be seen by the naked eye from a location where a person is legally permitted to be, it is typically legal to photograph or record it. While filming is a protected activity, it is not absolute. If filming crosses the line into harassment, stalking, or disorderly conduct—or if it is done to "clandestinely" capture private or intimate areas, it can become illegal. In this specific interaction, the officer determined that the videographer’s actions did not meet the legal threshold for a crime, which is why he could not intervene. If the market were held on private property rather than public land, the owners or organizers would have the right to set rules regarding photography or to ask people to leave. If someone refuses to leave private property after being asked, they can be cited for trespassing. The officer's inability to remove the videographer suggests that the location was either public property or that the organizer lacked the legal authority to exclude him from that specific area.

✨️Serenitee♡Sam✨️

42,895 views • 3 months ago

"If I were the young lady in that pharmacy and a military officer walked in angry, I wouldn’t dare speak to him. But this young lady, knowing that her father is a soldier, tried to appease him and that’s why he beat her up," — Richard Kumadoe on a soldier’s attack on a drugstore attendant and female customer. Watch the full episode here: #PrimeMorning with Musbau

"If I were the young lady in that pharmacy and a military officer walked in angry, I wouldn’t dare speak to him. But this young lady, knowing that her father is a soldier, tried to appease him and that’s why he beat her up," — Richard Kumadoe on a soldier’s attack on a drugstore attendant and female customer. Watch the full episode here: #PrimeMorning with Musbau

Joy Prime

586,464 views • 10 months ago