Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

Go Home

Oncologist Dr. Angus Dalgleish on the Covid jabs causing "horrendous autoimmunity, guaranteed" "80% of [the spike protein] was identical to human epitopes, which meant if you use this as a vaccine, you were going to get horrendous autoimmunity guaranteed" "and that's exactly what we sat back and witnessed" "and...

34,453 views • 2 days ago •via X (Twitter)

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

NEW: Eminent oncologist Dr. Angus Dalgleish: "Yes," the Covid jabs cause "turbo cancers" "Pfizer's full of SV40, a known oncogene... [and the jabs] switch off [tumor] suppressor genes... [so] you get cancer 20, 30 years earlier" "[This is] the crime of the century" This clip of Dalgleish, who's also a professor of oncology at St George’s, University of London, is taken from a conversation posted to the LIGHTHOUSETV (LightHouseTV) YouTube channel on July 10, 2026. ----------------Partial transcription of clip--------------- Del Bigtree: "Do you believe the Covid vaccine is creating turbo cancers? And if so, what would the mechanism be?" Dalgleish: "We don't have much time, so the answer is yes. And, what is the mechanism? Well, I have been working with many colleagues on this, surveying the literature, and it is very clear that there are many reasons for it. "In fact, with my latest paper of reviewing, we've reviewed over 400 publications of various instances is that there are so many ways, it's surprising there's not more. "I mean, I mentioned the T cell response being suppressed. It then switches the antibody IgG switch, so the system becomes tolerant, so the body's converted into it's ready for transplant, so it doesn't reject the kidney, therefore it doesn't reject the cancer. "It can integrate into the genome next to oncogenes. Pfizer's full of SV40, a known oncogene. Many, many different ways, it interferes with the metabolic pathways, all sorts of pathways, dozens of signaling pathways that if you overstimulate them, they will drive cancer. They won't switch itself off. "And the one I'm most worried about is it can bind and switch off the suppressor genes like P53, BRCA, MSH. Now if you have a mutation in one of these genes naturally, which people do, that's just what happens. You get your cancer 20, 30 years earlier than you would normally. "If you were to interfere with more than two or three of these things, you can bring that forward really far. And so that means when you do get a cancer, you haven't got the brakes. You've removed the brakes on it. "And what is worrying is that I have seen, I saw my very best friend who, had a booster just to travel. This is the nonsense. He did not need this booster. And he came down and presented a few weeks after the booster. And he said he never felt well since he had it with very bad back pain. So he was investigated, he was just riddled. It turned out to be melanoma. "Somebody else, another good friend, had the same issue after the same booster. He was riddled too. His was myeloma. So— But I've never seen that sort of presentation in my life in 40 years of doing this sudden boom. And it is definitely associated. "And Ryan Cole in the States, he's one of many, many others that said this is real. And once you get into messenger RNA technology that can integrate at random, that's why it is the stupidest thing to try and make a vaccine on, because it is about as clever as trying to herd cats. It's absolutely impossible and they should give up now. "And the last thing I say, with everything we've learned, please ban all messenger RNA vaccines, because they're not vaccines, they're gene therapies. If we don't, and giving them to children could interfere with their genome for the rest of life. "I mean, I regard the people that allowed these things to go into young people and children when we knew none of them were going to be killed, as basically criminal medical negligence and the crime of the century."

Sense Receptor

107,223 views • 3 days ago

💥Neale Hanvey in the UK Parliament Excess Deaths Debate mentioned the concerns of London Professor of Oncology, and principal of the Institute for Cancer Vaccines and Immunotherapy, Professor Angus Dalgleish in this 20m speech below. "According to the University of London Professor of Oncology, and principal of the Institute for Cancer Vaccines and Immunotherapy, Professor Angus Dalgleish, this has precipitated various serious and sometimes fatal consequences due to antibody development mediated by the spike protein. I will not go into the detail of that, but at a meeting convened by the hon. Member for North West Leicestershire, Professor Dalgleish told us that the UK Government and their agencies are in serious denial about this issue, resulting in many deaths being poorly understood" [NEALE CONTINUED FURTHER] “a sequence that is ‘used to drive DNA into the nucleus, especially in gene therapies’ and that this is ‘something that regulatory agencies around the world have specifically said is not possible with the mRNA vaccines’. These SV40 promotors are also well recognised as being oncogenic”— or cancer-inducing genetic material. Other scientists have confirmed those findings. Professor Dalgleish further notes: “To put it bluntly, this means that they are not vaccines at all but a…Genetically Modified Organism that should have been subject to totally different regulatory conditions and certainly not be classed as vaccines.” Worryingly, Professor Dalgleish also notes that oncologists have contacted him from across the world, and the consensus is that this is thought to be precipitating relapse in melanoma, lymphoma, leukaemia and kidney cancers. He concludes with the following warning - To advise booster vaccines, as is the current case, is no more and no less than medical incompetence" It appears that this specialist DR in Japan shares concerns similar to this specialist Oncologist in the United Kingdom, Professor Angus Dalgleish

Humanspective

19,416 views • 2 years ago

Prof. Angus Dalgleish: "This [was] all pre-planned... the so-called COVID pandemic, the global warming, etc. etc... What's common about them is they all... have to induce... a state of fear... climate change... like COVID [is] all doom and gloom [based on]... computer models." This clip of Dalgleish, a professor of oncology at St George’s, University of London, is from a conversation with Charles Kovess (Charles Kovess) et al. posted to Rumble on August 17, 2025. ---------------Partial Transcription of Clip-------------- "This is all pre-planned. I mean I'm horrified to say that because I never thought that the people would stoop so low at the beginning I thought the, I used to think the best of everything, but I never thought it'd be so low. But I've just finished editing another book along the lines of Death in Science, which we did, which I mentioned. And the bottom line of this is actually putting the similarities between things like the so-called COVID pandemic, the global warming, etc. Etc. "What's common about them, they all induce, have to induce artificially psyops, everything, a state of fear. Absolutely Angus, that's very important. Yeah, yeah, they have to induce a state of fear and then you can start to control the population. And what you have to get across this is for the greater good. You are going to have to make sacrifices for the greater good and this, that and the other. "But if you ask the simple question Cui bono, who benefits? It is quite horrendous. It's based on the manipulation of the governments and government agencies from the United nations to the top. The who, all the governments who acted identically because they were all feared, they were all told they had to look after their population and induce these. Any human rights lawyers or anything like that were told no, no. This is the state of war. You've got to shut up. This is what we're going to do and this is the plan. We will rescue you with these vaccines. "And now it's the same with the climate control. Exactly the same. You've got to do all this sacrifice for your children otherwise they'll end up in a burning hell of a planet. It's exactly so. You have to agree to all these things. But who benefits? The people who benefit are people who are already supremely rich. The Bill Gateses and the Soroses and all these people of the world. And what I witnessed amongst this is basically I would say the greatest removal of money from the very poor and given to the very rich since the Napoleonic wars. And it's like these, these are scams that make these people super rich and in control. "And they worked out how to use these big organizations which used to be very thinking, altruistic, doing everything for the good. So they're completely in the control. And if you go, the climate change is another thing. Totally. And I can't find any redeeming defects for climate change, only on the grounds that certain people manipulated their data. And like the COVID all the doom, gloom and horror was all done in computer models, which the government accepted. "They wouldn't accept logic from people like me or several people who've been climatologists at top universities all their lives who said, you know, there is no scientific evidence for this. This is all speculation. They were basically hoodwinked into believing this stuff. And it's just, you know, the UK thing, all the decisions were based on Neil Ferguson's pathetic, puerile and, completely incompetent, useless modeling, which was funded by and still is. And he's been given another enormous grant, in spite of the fact he's never got anything right in his life. Bill Gates, it all goes. So this, this is what really frightens me."

Sense Receptor

15,240 views • 10 months ago

"Spike protein was designed as a bioweapon...this entire pandemic was to reduce life expectancy...the United Nations has been clear about its intentions to reduce the world's population. So they created a virus to create a need for a vaccine, both of which had this bioweapon."** Canadian physician Dr. Charles Hoffe describes during a recent World Council for Health (World Council for Health (WCH)) discussion how he believes that the now-infamous "spike protein" was designed as a bioweapon. Hoffe says that he believes both the COVID-19 "pandemic" and the injections released to—ostensibly—immunize people were both created with the intention of "reducing the world's population." "I think the most critical thing to understand is that spike protein was designed as a bioweapon. I mean, it's now fairly clear that this entire pandemic was to reduce life expectancy," Hoffe says. "The United Nations has been quite clear about its intentions to reduce the world's population, and so they created a virus to create a need for a vaccine, both of which had this bioweapon, which is the spike protein." Hoffe goes on to say: "For those that managed to resist being forced into having the shots or were not coerced into it through fear, they got the spike protein from COVID infections or from shedding. So basically, we have all been spiked. And, of course, those who got the shots became spike protein factories and they got more than anyone else, but we have all been poisoned. "So there are many people who didn't have the shots who are noticing changes in their health. And I think, as a family doctor, what I'm seeing the most is recurrent infections and mostly viral infections, but some people with recurrent bacterial infections as well. And this is, just as doctor Villa mentioned, from this assault on our immune system. And, of course, the cancers are part of that and the autoimmune problems are part of that. But I think the most critical thing is that we've all been spiked, and, therefore, we all need to take measures to deal with that." **While I agree the injections are bioweapons and the UN (and whoever else is in the global cabal) wants to depopulate Earth, I believe it is more likely the cause of COVID is a chemical weapon and not a virus.

Sense Receptor

25,862 views • 1 year ago

We did not reject the “vaccine” due to ignorant and petulant behavior. We vocally rejected the vaccine because we were the side that diligently researched it and in fact most of us had diligently researched other vaccines before this. You didn’t research it, you blindly trusted and believed authority. Many of you then chose to gaslight and ridicule us, attempting to ostracize us from society. This isn’t a win for anyone, this is humanity taking a major loss. If you have convinced yourself that we just got lucky due to unhinged and ignorant distrust of the government and science, you haven’t learned the lesson. One side demonstrated strength, diligence, discernment and empathy. The other side was weak and mindlessly conformed. For example, I never for one second even considered taking the vaccine. I know all vaccines are poison and this was not even truly a vaccine. Yet, many of us still obsessively and diligently researched every aspect of this rollout. We discovered early on this was all a plan and they had run drills showing exactly what they were going to do. I then put my business on pause and completely emptied my bank accounts to go on tour and try to warn people in every major city for over a year. Why? Because many of us went into overdrive attempting to prevent this and help raise awareness to protect others. I am not virtue signaling, I am just telling you what actually happened. If you still cannot accept this fact and adjust accordingly, you will fall for the next deception.

Witsit

54,465 views • 2 years ago

Oncologist and Professor Emeritus Angus Dalgleish says "everybody" is now getting cancer post Covid jab: "Now it's everybody" "I am really horrified at the number of people getting cancer now" "[This is] grievous bodily harm" "this [is an] organized assault, basically" This clip of Dalgleish, a professor of oncology at St George’s, University of London, is taken from a conversation posted to the LIGHTHOUSETV (LightHouseTV) YouTube channel on May 25, 2026. ---------------Partial transcription of clip---------------- "And one of the guys who'd been at a sort of similar level to myself in the company says, you know, Pfizer aren't interested in cures, they're only interested in expanding markets. That fits the vaccine for Covid. "Again, they don't think things through. Although other people have thought things through for them. On the grounds that the vaccine's clearly causing a cancer increase incidence. I've talked about it suppresses the T-cell response and then the input from the others, colorectal— Well now it's everybody. "I mean the breasts. Young women going down with breast cancer after boosters. It's just every— And I've got friends whose wives are going down with cancers after boosters. My friends don't have them because they've listen to me, but their wives listen to their GPs who I believe are complicit in this organized assault, basically. "Is it grievous bodily harm. You know, it is an assault because they know, they know it will not do them any good. And I just cannot understand why they're continuing to do it. Interestingly, they get paid for each vaccine. They don't get paid any extra for a consultation or something that's useful. And so I'll leave it at that. "But I am really horrified at the number of people getting cancer now. So my train of thought was mentioning that I point out that people are saying Pfizer buys up company making new anti-cancer drug. Pfizer buys yet another company involved in the field of cancer, and implying that well, they're creating an expanded market for— I mean it is, I can only call that evil, I don't call that capitalism. "Because if you're in the health care industry, a lot of constraints seem to have been ignored that you should have just pure humanity. Morality seems to be completely ignored in all this. What for? Profits? Power? Manipulation? I mean why."

Sense Receptor

38,690 views • 1 month ago

.Joe Rogan and Dave Smith talk about how totalitarian COVID policies shattered trust in institutions, how mandatory mRNA shots were based on lies of preventing transmission, and the need to prosecute individuals in power like Anthony Fauci: "It's not that there's consensus among the scientists. Any scientist who disagrees with the consensus gets kicked out, excommunicated, and silenced. Then it's just this completely corrupt group that's very involved with this money-making machine, and there are such perverse incentives here. People realize this after time it gets demonstrated what they were saying was just wrong. No one can argue anymore that if you get the COVID vaccine, you can't get or transmit COVID. No one is arguing that anymore because you can't keep up that lie anymore. That lie was being pushed on mainstream news just a couple years ago... The World Health Organization is now saying that the vaccine shouldn't be given to kids. The thing that you said that was so controversial that Fauci had to comment on it was you were like, for young people, I don't know if I would really tell you to take this vaccine, just be really healthy, eat well, exercise, and get sunlight. That was the dangerous misinformation that you were spreading, and at the same time, Fauci was saying if you get the vaccine, you aren't going to get COVID. You can't spread it. So who's spreading misinformation? And they knew it was misinformation because they never tested it for transmission... All of the policies were built around the [transmission] idea. The whole idea of vaccine mandates and vaccine passports, and this was all predicated on the idea that it wasn't just your choice for your own health risks, but you are protecting other people. That was the whole idea that everything was based on. If that's not true, then there's no justification for this, and millions lost their jobs... It's all fucked up because it was also incentivizing people to go along with something they might not want to do, and when you see the amount of people that got damaged because of that, both financially and physically, vaccine injuries, ostracized from their communities, how many marriages broke up, how many friendships broke up, I know a lot of people that were skeptical about the COVID vaccine and they were shamed by their friends. They lost contact with those people and stopped being friends with them... My view is that for the people at the very top, there should be trials. There should be Nuremberg-type trials for what people did. It's one of the greatest crimes the government perpetrated on the American people. Especially if we funded the research that caused it in the first place. Which we did... At the top level, people should be prosecuted. Fauci should be prosecuted. Don't forget what these guys were willing to jump on board with. And how much further would they have gone? They pushed it pretty far, and these guys were completely on board. Is it really unthinkable to say if they were like hey, we are going to round up the unvaccinated and take them away from their families? Some people would have gone along with it... Sam Harris had that clip arguing that if this was worse, we wouldn't have tolerated any COVID misinformation... When he said it, the first thing I thought was, oh yeah, in your scenario, you guys would have gone full Nazi. If it was way worse, you guys wouldn't have been like light totalitarians. You would have gone to some full dark totalitarian thing."

KanekoaTheGreat

673,686 views • 3 years ago