Loading video...
Video Failed to Load
💥Oncologist Dr. Makis recommends topical application of castor oil + ivermectin cream to treat breast cancer, head and neck cancer, skin cancer, with remarkable results Many cancer patients have made this combination their secret weapon! He reposted this video on using castor oil—worth a watch👇 Gently massage organic cold-pressed... show more
108,844 views • 1 month ago •via X (Twitter)
0 Comments
No comments available
Comments from the original post will appear here
!["[Ivermectin has] amazing topical applications...[I've been flooded] with...testimonials of people's skin cancers disappearing...after a few months...applying it...the skin cancer literally falls off...[people with] the worst type of acne...[are] seeing relief..." Radiologist, oncologist, and cancer researcher Dr. William Makis (MakisMD) describes on a recent episode of Talk Truth (Talk Truth) how ivermectin—a broad-spectrum antiparasitic agent with multiple mechanisms of action—has "amazing topical applications," which include treating skin cancers and the worst types of acne. Makis notes that people "start putting [ivermectin] on things and trying things, and then [he gets] flooded with all these testimonials of people's skin cancers disappearing." The physician adds, "after a few months of applying it topically, [their] skin cancer literally falls off. It falls off; it's gone." ---------------Partial transcription of clip--------------- "But [it's] an incredible drug and not just taking it orally, but it has also amazing topical applications as well... Good old horse paste from Tractor Supply... people just start putting it on their skin... They start putting it on things and trying things. And then I get flooded with all these testimonials of people's skin cancers disappearing. "They start putting it on basal cell carcinomas or squamous cell or even melanomas. And they see these lesions shrinking right before their eyes. And again, you know, there's no research published on this and yet people are trying it. They're seeing the results. And if, you know, after a few months of applying it topically, the skin cancer literally falls off. It falls off, it's gone. "And, you know, people are treating all kinds of skin conditions [including] severe acne. I've had some patients with the cystic acne, which is the worst type of acne you can have, seeing relief for the first time and they've tried every medication there is out there. The dermatologist prescribed them every medication, they've had no relief, they try ivermectin, [and] they're seeing relief for the first time. "So you can apply it topically as well. Some really incredible stories coming out. People with with nodules—lipomas or lesions. I have breast cancer patients that have, for example, auxiliary lymph nodes. They're putting topical ivermectin on and they can feel the cancerous lymph nodes shrinking as time goes on. So just an incredible and versatile drug."](https://image.24vids.com/tw-1904003706116550946/ext_tw_video_thumb/1903999133163122691/pu/img/nl41_v5kHNB1xAhr.jpg)
![Oncologist Dr. William Makis: "The turbo cancers after the COVID vaccines do respond to the antiparasitics, and they respond very well... [And] why do these antiparasitics work?" Todd Callender: "Cancer's a parasite?" Makis: "That's one possibility." This clip of Dr. Makis (William Makis), a radiologist, oncologist, and cancer researcher, is taken from an interview with attorney Todd Callender posted to the VaxxCHOICE (VaxxCHOICE) Rumble channel on November 21, 2025. ---------------Partial transcription of clip---------------- Dr. Makis: "The turbo cancers after the COVID vaccines do respond to the antiparasitics and they respond very well. This is, you know, whether it's ivermectin, fenbendazole or mebendazole, these patients are responding. "Now this is very important because patients who've developed cancer after taking Covid vaccines, they don't respond usually to conventional treatments. That's one of the hallmarks of turbo cancer is they present at a very late stage. These are extremely rapidly growing tumors. They're coming in at stage four. And it's whether it's young women with breast cancer, women in their 20s, something we've never seen before, young women with, men and women with colon cancer in their 20s and 30s. "Again, we've never seen—" Callender: "Two- year-olds, I've heard of two- year-olds with colon cancer—" Dr. Makis: "—we've never seen this before. That's the incredible part. And they're not responding to conventional treatments. So, they're not responding to chemo, they're not responding to radiation therapy, immunotherapy, or if they do response, they have a very, very short response time or remission time. And then the cancer comes roaring back. "And in a lot of these tragic cases, the patient dies within six months. This is another one of the features of turbo cancer is the prognosis is extremely poor if you go the conventional route. So you need something else. Now when you're using antiparasitics, for cancer, the dose is higher than the dose you would use to treat parasites or to treat Covid. So I give just a rule of thumb for ivermectin, for example, it's about five times the dose that you would need for cancer, about 5 to 10 times the dose than if you were just treating parasites or viruses. "And to go into the— why does it work? Why do these antiparasitics work?" Callender: "Cancer's a parasite?" Dr. Makis: "Well, that's one possibility. But there's more to it than that because, out of the 400 papers that have been published, a lot of those researchers look at the mechanisms. They are trying to identify the mechanisms of how ivermectin is treating these cancers. "And you've got, for example, there was one study published a few years ago, Mexican researchers, again, you're not going to see this done in the United States, Mexico. Mexican researchers took 28 different cancer cell lines, applied ivermectin to them, and all of them responded. Now to various degrees, you had breast cancer and ovarian cancer actually responding the most to ivermectin. You had the most cancer cell killing when they were exposed to ivermectin. "But when they look at the mechanisms, they've identified a number of interesting things. For example, ivermectin shuts down and kills cancer stem cells. Now, this is important because cancer stem cells are the reason chemotherapy doesn't work. When you have stage four pancreatic cancer, stage four ovarian cancer, and you go to your oncologist, they will tell you, we will give you chemo, but we can't cure you. It's palliative chemo. It'll buy you an extra six months, an extra 12 months of life. "The reason why they say that is why the chemo is palliative, not curative. It's is because chemo cannot kill cancer stem cells, which are not rapidly dividing. Chemo will kill everything that's rapidly dividing, but cancer stem cells are not rapidly dividing. And so the chemo will kill the rapidly dividing tumor cells, and it'll leave the cancer stem cells alone, while the cancer stem cells will start rapidly dividing a year later, two years later, they're going to spread to other parts of the body. Suddenly you've got recurrence, you've got metastases. Ivermectin will shut down and kill cancer stem cells. "So imagine you, added to your chemo regimen, and now you've essentially turned what's palliative chemo or a palliative situation to potentially a curative situation. And I really do believe I've come to the point, having helped over 7,000 cancer patients in the last year, I've come to the point where I could confidently say that stage 4 pancreatic cancer is curable, stage 4 ovarian cancer is curable, stage 4 colon cancer, lung cancer. These cancers are curable. I think if you add repurposed drugs, you add antiparasitics, you can turn these into curable situations. "Now, of course, we have to prove that. We have to do the research, do the publications. But in the meantime, I say stage 4 cancer patients don't have 10 years to wait for mainstream oncology or mainstream medicine to catch up with what we're seeing already clinically, in practice."](https://image.24vids.com/tw-1993127013713166353/amplify_video_thumb/1993124339852754944/img/m5izGyXtNBTWkWd4.jpg)
![Oncologist Dr. William Makis describes getting attacked by the president of City of Hope cancer centers for publishing success stories using antiparasitics to treat turbo cancers: "These antiparasitics are being heavily attacked and are being suppressed every time I mention ivermectin, mebendazole, [and] fenbendazole. And I have hundreds of success stories...." This clip of Dr. Makis, a radiologist, oncologist, and cancer researcher, is taken from a panel discussion posted to the World Council for Health Rumble channel on November 24, 2025. ---------------Partial transcription of clip---------------- "So these antiparasitics are being heavily attacked, and are being suppressed every time I mention ivermectin, mebendazole, fenbendazole, and I have hundreds of success stories. I get attacked. I get attacked by mainstream doctors and mainstream oncologists. "And just going back to what Kevin McKernan said about this phenomenon of trying to retract papers, get good papers retracted, I've had this happen to me very recently. We published recently a paper on fenbendazole. Three cases of stage four cancer patients who had failed three or four or five lines of chemotherapy, and mainstream oncology regimens. These cancer patients were dying. They took fenbendazole and they became cancer free. And we followed them up, up to three years. They stayed cancer three for up to three years. So we had three cases. We published this paper a few months ago. This was only the second paper published on the antiparasitic fenbendazole in the past five years with human cases. The first one was published by Stanford University in 2021. And so they had published three cases in 2021. We published three cases in 2025. Within a month or two of the publication of our paper. Now it passed peer review and it was published. We were attacked by the editor of the paper, who's actually the president of the City of Hope cancer centers in the United States, in Atlanta, Chicago, and Phoenix. "This was Dr. Maurice [Maurie] Markman, President of City of Hope, so a big time oncologist, with a lot of, you know, big pharma funding behind him. He said he's going to pull the paper. And they didn't have a good reason to pull the paper. In fact, the reason that they were putting was that I was giving, you know, medical advice to other cancer patients with fenbendazole. And so that was some kind of a conflict of interest. And because, you know, that wasn't declared in the way they liked, that they were going to pull the paper. "And so, you know, this is an attack. We're going to see these attacks not just on Kevin McKernan and David Speicher's work in trying to make the link between Covid vaccines and these turbo cancers. But even those of us who are going to try to treat these patients, and help these patients and try to get that work published with antiparasitics and these turbo cancers, we're being attacked, and our papers are being attacked for retraction as well." #Fenbendazole #Ivermectin #Cancercure](https://image.24vids.com/tw-2072362082264047725/amplify_video_thumb/2072361878592933888/img/oHkZrV5xM-aB9mvY.jpg)
![Can people in power/ authority kindly stop with this absolute BS on "fasting killing cancer cells" and citing religious nonsense to appeal to peoples emotions? Fasting is really quite dangerous for cancer patients in real life. Let me explain and bury this myth once and for all, especially for science illiterates like this guy. [1] The most common argument is that fasting "starves" cancer by cutting off its sugar (glucose) supply. While it is true that cancer cells consume vast amounts of glucose, they are biologically aggressive survivalists. If you stop eating, your body eventually switches to burning fat and breaking down muscle for energy. Cancer cells are highly adaptable; when glucose is low, many types of cancer can mutate to feed on other fuel sources, such as lactate, amino acids (from your muscles), or fatty acids. You cannot simply "starve" a tumor without starving the patient first. [2] Fasting is dangerous for cancer patients because of cancer cachexia - a wasting syndrome where the body loses muscle and fat rapidly. Cachexia is responsible for up to 30% of cancer deaths. Cancer puts the body in a hyper-metabolic state (burning energy fast). If a patient fasts, they risk accelerating muscle loss and weakening their immune system. A weak body cannot tolerate life-saving treatments like chemotherapy or radiation, nor can it fight off infections. [3] Most claims about fasting curing cancer come from studies on mice or cells in a petri dish. In a dish: You can kill cancer cells with almost anything (lemon juice, bleach, starvation, even shooting a bullet at it at close point or using a grenade to destroy the entire lab) because they have no immune system or body to protect them. In a human: The biology is infinitely more complex. Human metabolism, hormonal fluctuations, and tumor micro-environments mean that what shrinks a tumor in a mouse often fails completely in human trials. [4] Proponents often cite "autophagy" (the body's cellular recycling process triggered by fasting) as the cure. They claim it cleans out cancerous cells. Science shows that autophagy is a double-edged sword. -In all people, autophagy is a normal physiological process - whether fasting or not, which help in cleaning up damaged cells. -But in patients with cancer, once a tumor exists, cancer cells can actually hijack autophagy to survive stress (like chemotherapy) and repair themselves. In this context, fasting could theoretically help the cancer survive the treatment intended to kill it. [5] "Cancer" is not one disease; it is over 200 different diseases characterized by uncontrolled cell growth. Some cancers are driven by hormones, some by genetic mutations, and some by viruses. A fasting protocol that slows down one specific type of breast cancer might have zero effect on pancreatic cancer, or worse, accelerate a different type. The most lethal aspect of this misinformation is the delay in treatment. Cancer is a time-sensitive disease. While a patient spends months trying to fast the cancer away based on religious or alternative advice, the cancer often metastasizes (spreads) to other organs. Once cancer spreads, it often moves from being curable to being terminal. Relying solely on fasting wastes the critical window where medical intervention could have saved a life. Suggesting a single "ancient cure" for 200 complex genetic diseases is scientifically illogical... ...and generally stupid, as this video proves.](https://image.24vids.com/tw-2011663028648026498/amplify_video_thumb/2011661209100304388/img/DJHOW69erAX5Hmbo.jpg)
!["The top 5 turbo cancers that have come out in my research, the top one is lymphoma, then glioblastomas or brain cancers in general. There's some...rare spinal cord cancers, but mainly glioblastomas. And then for for whatever reason, there's breast cancers..." Radiologist, oncologist, and cancer researcher Dr. William Makis (MakisMD) describes for BSfreeMD (BSfreeMD) how he noticed a pattern of physicians dying unexpectedly following the rollout of the COVID injections; including doctors in their twenties, thirties, and forties. A subset of these deaths, Makis says, have been "turbo cancer" deaths. "They were cancer, but it wasn't just cancer. It was stage 4. And it was always stage 4 diagnosis, presentation after two shots or booster shot, three shots and what was fascinating was the types of cancer too," the cancer researcher adds. Makis notes that the top turbo cancers he's observed following the rollout of the COVID injections are lymphomas (cancer of the lymphatic system), brain cancers, rare spinal cord cancers, and breast cancers. The physician adds that there's also been an "explosion of leukemias" (blood cell cancer) and kidney cancers. Partial transcription of clip: "As I dug deeper, I saw all these sudden unexpected deaths of these young doctors, and it wasn't like doctors in their sixties, seventies. It was, like, in their forties, thirties—medical students in their twenties. No one was talking about it. So, I brought that to international attention, and, of course, then the mainstream media came after me very, very viciously with Toronto Star, Reuters, Associated Press, all of them saying, you know, I'm insane, and this phenomenon doesn't exist. Even the Canadian Medical Association has been burying this for 2 years now. "But there was a big subset of these deaths, these unexpected deaths, and they were cancer. They were cancer, but it wasn't just cancer. It was stage 4. And it was always stage 4 diagnosis, presentation after two shots or booster shot, three shots and what was fascinating was was the types of cancer too. It was, you know, gastric cancer in a 30-year-old, lung cancer in a 40-year-old. Then, you know, the breast cancer started showing up. "The brain cancers, bizarre brain cancers, lots of glioblastomas, of course, but also these weird spinal tumors as well and it seems that these cancers, not only were they presenting at stage 4, but they were killing these doctors in a matter of months. And if you know anything about oncology, you know that even if you present with stage 4 breast cancer or colon cancer, it's not a death sentence. You could still live for years with these stage 4 prostate cancer. You could live many, many years, if you're, you know, taking the various treatments. And these cancers were killing people in, you know, in a matter of two months, three months, four months, as if they were all pancreatic cancers or as if they were all glioblastoma. So something was very wrong. you know, the behavior was completely different, and very, very few people are talking about it. "But when it comes to the mainstream medical establishment, it doesn't exist. And this is one of the few vaccine injuries that they will never admit. They've admitted the myocarditis. They've admitted the blood clots. Now they will lie about it. They'll say, well, myocarditis is one in 20,000, and it's all mild, then it's all healthy for you. It shows the vaccine works. This is, I mean, this literally is coming out of the new president of the Canadian Medical Association, Joss Reimer. She says, all the myocarditis is mild, and it's wonderful, and it means that the vaccine works and it all disappears, and it's all good. And there's no serious side effects. "But cancer is so controversial. They will not admit it. They are attacking all of us who are talking about it. But I can tell you in very brief terms the the characteristics of these turbo cancers. I'm seeing it mainly in, the mRNA vaccines, Pfizer or Moderna. I've almost never seen it with J&J and AstraZeneca. It may be happening, but, you know, there's so few cases. I cannot reach any conclusion right now. But I'm seeing thousands of these cases with Pfizer vaccines, Moderna vaccines. The presentations are stage 4, almost always. You'll get the occasional stage 2, stage 3 that rapidly progresses to stage 4 in a matter of months. But almost always, it's stage 4 presentation. "The top 5 turbo cancers that have come out in my research, the top one is lymphoma, then glioblastomas or brain cancers in general. There's some astrocytomas, some, you know, very rare spinal cord cancers, but mainly glioblastomas. And then, for whatever reason, there's breast cancers, mostly triple negative breast cancers. That is the main one. That's also the one with the poorest prognosis. Colon cancers is another big one and lung cancers, for whatever reason. And so those are the top fives. Then there's, of course, an explosion of leukemias, pancreatic cancers, melanomas, sarcomas of all kinds. "I could write an article [and] share 30 or 40 angiosarcomas. Like, that is something you see once in your career. And I could give you 30 cases right now. I could spend, you know, maybe one hour on the Internet, and I could give you 30 cases like that. [There's also] testicular and ovarian cancer, so the reproductive cancers, and kidney as well—these very extremely aggressive kidney cancers."](https://image.24vids.com/tw-1822422674938728498/ext_tw_video_thumb/1822417422915190785/pu/img/0ClmfV6rHgOTo2YJ.jpg)
![Oncologist Dr. William Makis: "Every component of the COVID vaccine can contribute to cancer...[the] spike protein [is] integrating into...tumor cells...& Pfizer CEO Albert Bourla is...excited about this...he's...stated that one-third of all people will get cancer, guaranteed" This clip of Dr. Makis (William Makis), a radiologist, oncologist, and cancer researcher, is taken from an interview with Shannon Joy (Shannon Joy) posted to The Shannon Joy Show Rumble channel on October 16, 2025. ----------------Partial transcription of clip--------------- "I think every component of the COVID vaccine can contribute to cancer. And we don't know right now which are the main drivers of cancer. My personal, hypothesis is that it's the damage to the immune system that is driving the cancer. I think we're seeing extensive immune system damage across the board in the vaccinated population, because they get infected more often. So they keep getting Covid and they'll say, well, I got my sixth or seventh shot, Covid shot, and I've gotten Covid five times, six times now. "They keep getting sick. They keep getting sick with other infections like influenza. They keep getting viral, reinfections, you, know, with Epstein Barr virus and HSV, herpes simplex and so on. They get shingles, so their immune systems are damaged and destroyed. And this is happening to kids as well. The kids are also getting damaged immune systems. I think that's going to be one of the big drivers of cancer. "But the work that Kevin McKernan is doing is in terms of the DNA contamination of the vaccines, the SV40 promoter, and the plasmids that have contaminated the vaccines because of the mass manufacturing process that Pfizer and Moderna are using, and they are still using. He's actually now discovering, the vaccine component, so the DNA contamination, which has a spike protein integrating into cells. And he's finding it in cancers, in tumor cells. This is actually where the research is right now is there's already several papers coming, tested the tumor. They did genetic testing on the tumor and they found the vaccine component integrated into the tumor cell and it's in all the tumor cells. "But they're going to say, well, you know, it's just one case and it's anecdotal and all this, or it's a couple of cases and it's anecdotal. But this is where I think the the research is being focused to prove that, yes, this genetic therapy, because it's not a vaccine. And I posted about this recently. This was from the SEC filings of Moderna. They stated this is a gene therapy, it's not a vaccine. "[And] it's contaminated. So it's got all kinds of genetic junk in there. It's not just the modified mRNA, it's got the DNA contaminations. It's got DNA mRNA Hybrids, it's got double-stranded RNA hybrids. It is literally a cocktail of genetic junk encapsulated in a lipid nanoparticle, which itself is quite toxic, that is delivering this genetic junk all over our body. It's dumping it into the bone marrow. So we're seeing leukemias and blood cancers like multiple myeloma. It's dumping it into the brain, crossing the blood–brain barrier, because it's a lipid particle, crosses very easily. "And I'm seeing brain cancers, the most aggressive brain cancers you can imagine, the glioblastomas. It's dumping it into the ovaries and testicles. We're seeing ovarian and testicular cancers. It's dumping it into the kidneys. I'm seeing kidney cancers. And so wherever this genetic material goes and it doesn't stay in the arm, that was the big lie. I think that was one of the biggest lies that people should go to jail for, for the rest of their lives. Who created this, this monstrosity. "And it doesn't stay in the arm. About 75% of it is in the bloodstream within a couple of hours. And it's delivering this genetic junk with the lipid nanoparticles all over the body. And the most shocking situation that no one's talking about, and I've talked about this, put out a few articles on this, is it crosses the placenta and it's dumping the genetic material into the fetus and the fetus takes it up, and now I'm seeing cancers in fetuses, in utero. These babies are deliver, are, are developing tumors in the womb. And so there was a case not that long ago of, of triplets being born. I think the first one had a tumor that, that grew in utero and then through the placenta, transferred it to the second one. So the second one developed cancer a few months after being born. I mean, these are horror stories, Shannon. These are absolute horror stories. "This MRNA technology needs to be halted and banned. It needs to be banned. I don't care if they're going to try to investigate it for the next 20 years and try to figure out what went wrong. This is extremely dangerous. It's got to be banned because we're going to be overtaken completely with cancer. "And you know, Pfizer and Pfizer CEO Albert Bourla is actually super excited about this and he's publicly stated that one third of all people will get cancer guaranteed. And that he's going to scale up production of cancer drugs and mRNA cancer vaccines the way he scaled up production for Covid vaccines."](https://image.24vids.com/tw-1978993333495304403/amplify_video_thumb/1978990664038653952/img/TGHx8qRVuZ5jfkeY.jpg)
![🚨"[It was] this massive alien sucking the life off of me!" Young, super-fit man describes how he spilled glyphosate on his neck and developed cancer—exactly where it was spilled—just months after "One of the reasons [I] believe... it was glyphosate is because... I never had any cancerous lymph nodes in my whole lymphatic system besides... where it weaponized my lymph nodes and made them into a tumor, essentially" "it took from, when I was diagnosed, just a matter of months to where you see in these pictures here... this massive alien sucking the life off of me" "I personally don't believe any cancer is natural... We've been lied to, obviously" This clip of Arden Allison, who had to battle the cancer he's describing for seven years, is taken from a conversation with Polly Tommey of Children’s Health Defense posted to YouTube on July 17, 2026. His mother, Serene Allison, is the woman sitting next to him. ----------------Partial transcription of clip--------------- Arden: "One of the big exposures that I had, instead of just a mist, I— the truck sprayer broke. So instead of a big sprayer that shoots about 30 feet away, broke. So I had to go spray the compound and the access road with a backpack sprayer. "Well, I jumped over a little, I guess four foot fence, climbed over, jumped, landed, and braced for it, which is no problem. But when I did so I kind of bent over, the lid popped off and I was completely doused, up, like shoulders and kind of, I guess upper body area with glyphosate. "And number one, I was like, okay, it's fine. I was told it was healthy and not healthy, but it was absolutely fine. No problem. Was not a chemical. Number two, I didn't have access to a shower, so I washed off with a water bottle... And then continued to work until the, to the end of the day. And number three, it was hot, my pores were open, I was sweaty. And you just soak up all those chemicals and that whole season of work. "I worked for them for only about two months before I got tired of traveling and being on the road. That was September, October of 2015. And then I was diagnosed, just after, in 2016. Serene: "And, the kind of muscly brawn guy, he's six foot five, he was just becoming like, instead of mesomorphic, he was ectomorphic. He was getting thinner by the day. And I'm like, Arden, you okay? And he's like, I got a bit of a scratchy throat. And he kept on itching all around. "He was just always itching, and I'm like, something's— What do you got, a rash or something? He's just itching all the time. And he said he started having trouble sleeping at night. He said, it's just so hot. I'm sweating through the nights. Which is a sign of Hodgkin's lymphoma, apparently. Arden: "It's a sign of a lot of different illnesses, like having night sweats. Your body's not, you know, properly functioning, but, yeah. Polly Tommey: "And, and so those pictures are shocking. So how long did it take for you to swell up around your neck? And you're describing how the glyphosate spilled on you in exactly those areas." Arden: "Yeah, so that's, that's one of the reasons why I do believe, that it was glyphosate is because I— That's— I only dumped it and had an exposure, an extreme exposure in this area. I never had any cancerous lymph nodes in my whole lymphatic system. Besides, you know, right here. These were where it weaponized my, you know, my lymph nodes and made them into, you know, a tumor, essentially. "But, yeah, it took. When I was diagnosed, the doctor said, hey, congratulations. If you're gonna have cancer, this is the one you want. So many young people beat it. And the good news is, you're young. So awesome. Fist bump. And I was like, all right, cool. "At first, I was shocked because I was man, I shouldn't be having cancer. And I didn't even know what it was. I only thought old people and unhealthy people got cancer at the time. It was just so, bizarre and unheard of. "Now, it took from, when I was diagnosed, just a matter of months to where you see on these pictures here, where I had these massive. This massive alien sucking the life off of me. I personally don't believe any cancer is natural. "They say genetic. Yeah, there are. There are some. But I think it's just. It starts in. It starts by chemicals. These genetic strains start by chemicals. We've been— We've been lied to, obviously. "We have record diagnosis of crazy cancers, new cancers. Man, this stuff we've never seen before. The doctor said we've never seen a Hodgkins lymphoma this aggressive. "It has to be fed by chemicals. When we play God, we have these organizations that play God, tweak, what we spray on our crops. They tweak our food, and they genetically mutate it. And then we consume this and we're exposed to it. It's on golf courses. It's on everything."](https://image.24vids.com/tw-2078181122899620151/amplify_video_thumb/2078178183560761344/img/L5yPXGe2mZ4TdTey.jpg)
![NEW: Eminent oncologist Dr. Angus Dalgleish: "Yes," the Covid jabs cause "turbo cancers" "Pfizer's full of SV40, a known oncogene... [and the jabs] switch off [tumor] suppressor genes... [so] you get cancer 20, 30 years earlier" "[This is] the crime of the century" This clip of Dalgleish, who's also a professor of oncology at St George’s, University of London, is taken from a conversation posted to the LIGHTHOUSETV (LightHouseTV) YouTube channel on July 10, 2026. ----------------Partial transcription of clip--------------- Del Bigtree: "Do you believe the Covid vaccine is creating turbo cancers? And if so, what would the mechanism be?" Dalgleish: "We don't have much time, so the answer is yes. And, what is the mechanism? Well, I have been working with many colleagues on this, surveying the literature, and it is very clear that there are many reasons for it. "In fact, with my latest paper of reviewing, we've reviewed over 400 publications of various instances is that there are so many ways, it's surprising there's not more. "I mean, I mentioned the T cell response being suppressed. It then switches the antibody IgG switch, so the system becomes tolerant, so the body's converted into it's ready for transplant, so it doesn't reject the kidney, therefore it doesn't reject the cancer. "It can integrate into the genome next to oncogenes. Pfizer's full of SV40, a known oncogene. Many, many different ways, it interferes with the metabolic pathways, all sorts of pathways, dozens of signaling pathways that if you overstimulate them, they will drive cancer. They won't switch itself off. "And the one I'm most worried about is it can bind and switch off the suppressor genes like P53, BRCA, MSH. Now if you have a mutation in one of these genes naturally, which people do, that's just what happens. You get your cancer 20, 30 years earlier than you would normally. "If you were to interfere with more than two or three of these things, you can bring that forward really far. And so that means when you do get a cancer, you haven't got the brakes. You've removed the brakes on it. "And what is worrying is that I have seen, I saw my very best friend who, had a booster just to travel. This is the nonsense. He did not need this booster. And he came down and presented a few weeks after the booster. And he said he never felt well since he had it with very bad back pain. So he was investigated, he was just riddled. It turned out to be melanoma. "Somebody else, another good friend, had the same issue after the same booster. He was riddled too. His was myeloma. So— But I've never seen that sort of presentation in my life in 40 years of doing this sudden boom. And it is definitely associated. "And Ryan Cole in the States, he's one of many, many others that said this is real. And once you get into messenger RNA technology that can integrate at random, that's why it is the stupidest thing to try and make a vaccine on, because it is about as clever as trying to herd cats. It's absolutely impossible and they should give up now. "And the last thing I say, with everything we've learned, please ban all messenger RNA vaccines, because they're not vaccines, they're gene therapies. If we don't, and giving them to children could interfere with their genome for the rest of life. "I mean, I regard the people that allowed these things to go into young people and children when we knew none of them were going to be killed, as basically criminal medical negligence and the crime of the century."](https://image.24vids.com/tw-2075669279463317653/amplify_video_thumb/2075665163286646784/img/kN1B3BpW_qjIT-56.jpg)
