正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

One Nation One Election is against the basic structure of our Constitution; it is against diversity, against federalism, against the legislative rights and the very identity of every state; except that it was not any of these when Nehru implemented it for 15 years. My views:

334,314 次观看 • 1 年前 •via X (Twitter)

11 条评论

Bharath Gopu 🇮🇳 的头像
Bharath Gopu 🇮🇳1 年前

If Nehru does it then it Secular and Halal .......But If Modi merely reintroduced the same then it's COMMUNAL & HARAM

The Liberation Project 的头像
The Liberation Project1 年前

𝐓𝐎𝐏 𝟏𝟎 𝐖𝐎𝐑𝐒𝐓 𝐒𝐂𝐎𝐓𝐔𝐒 𝐑𝐔𝐋𝐈𝐍𝐆𝐒 𝘊𝘰𝘶𝘯𝘵𝘪𝘯𝘨 𝘥𝘰𝘸𝘯 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘵𝘰𝘱 𝘵𝘦𝘯 𝘸𝘰𝘳𝘴𝘵 𝘚𝘶𝘱𝘳𝘦𝘮𝘦 𝘊𝘰𝘶𝘳𝘵 𝘳𝘶𝘭𝘪𝘯𝘨𝘴 𝘴𝘪𝘯𝘤𝘦 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘤𝘰𝘯𝘴𝘦𝘳𝘷𝘢𝘵𝘪𝘷𝘦 𝘵𝘢𝘬𝘦𝘰𝘷𝘦𝘳 𝘧𝘰𝘶𝘳 𝘺𝘦𝘢𝘳𝘴 𝘢𝘨𝘰. ★ NEW ARTICLE ⬇️

Rajive Sood 🇮🇳 的头像
Rajive Sood 🇮🇳1 年前

One Nation One Election, the same concept that Pandit Nehru had no qualms implementing for 15 whole years, is suddenly a mortal threat to federalism, diversity, and the very soul of our Constitution according to the Congress today. What changed? Did the definition of democracy rewrite itself in invisible ink, or did the party's fondness for double standards simply grow with time? So let’s get this straight: When Nehru did it, it was visionary leadership. When anyone else talks about it, it’s a constitutional disaster. Ah, the remarkable elasticity of principles! Perhaps it’s not federalism or democracy that’s at stake—just the grip on selective outrage.

Ajay Gupta 的头像
Ajay Gupta1 年前

Are critics suggesting Nehru’s government was illegal? @ARanganathan72 Bcoz for nearly 2 decades after independence, India followed One Nation, One Election under his leadership. or is the outrage now just hypocrisy because it was Indira Gandhi who broke the cycle for political advantage?

Sanatani Thakur 🇮🇳 的头像
Sanatani Thakur 🇮🇳1 年前

After this 4 and a half mins on One nation one election by Ranganathan ji Still any pidi is countering the one nation one election stand They should be stamped as the biggest fools 😬😬😬

Wanderlust 的头像
Wanderlust1 年前

One Nation One Election saves a lot of time and taxpayers hard earned money... which can be and is presently used for nation building 😊👍👍👍

Dr. Srinivas Kakkilaya MBBS MD 的头像
Dr. Srinivas Kakkilaya MBBS MD1 年前

Except that Nehru didn't 'implement' it, but they happened so because after the Constitution came into force and the first elections were held in 1952, there were no changes in govts mid term anywhere. How self styled experts expose themselves so easily?😂

sunilpathak 的头像
sunilpathak1 年前

These people just want to oppose Modi and nothing else

Sanal MG 的头像
Sanal MG1 年前

Nehru did was wrong and Modi wants to repeat that mistake! Justification: Nehru did it! 😄 Tomorrow it will: Hitler did it!😄 If its abt money: More money you can save by running elections using mobile phone encrypted identity verifiable systems. 😄

Dev 的头像
Dev1 年前

Hence proved that we need a serious revisit to our constitution !?

D V S S Prasad 的头像
D V S S Prasad1 年前

Nehru and the subsequent PMs from congress couldn't maintain ONOP because they had to frequently dismiss the state governments under the ruling of opposition parties, using the Art 356.

相关视频