Video yükleniyor...
Video Yüklenemedi
Only Allah has the ultimate, unconditional right to legislate. This is a fundamental point of theology that every Muslim must believe. To claim that any entity or group of people has the unconditional authority to legislate is to claim there is another deity besides God. All religious folks believe... show more
13,559 görüntüleme • 11 gün önce •via X (Twitter)
25 Yorum

Show us where major Kufr can be justified by maslaha? You are following Deen of Tony Blair instead of Muhammad ﷺ.

Technically, nowhere in the Quran has Allah SWT asked us to choose evil. Nothing good can come from the lesser evil except evil. Vote is neither amanah or a testimony. Without voting also Muslims can be politically active.

Why participate when you know a group of people will legislate, even if they legislate something Halal this is not permissible. R u not legitimising this process by participating in kufr system. Did Rasool Saaw participate in Nadwa of Quraysh in 13yrs of Meccan life ?

Shura (42:38) was consultation over a judgment, not over right and wrong. Voting picks between two imperfect men; the hukm stays with Allah. That's a step, not a transfer of divine rights.

Legal = Halal, illegal = Haram. It's as simple as that. Any legislation that's enforced on the masses constitutes shirk in legislation regardless of what the person "believes" in his heart.

You totally ignore the act that you are doing = giving someone the support and right to legislate laws beside Allah. This is shirk. Forget "the good intention". Its doesnt save you that you do evil and kufr and then "i only wanted good". Allah hasnt allowed you to do kufr!

Who even said anything about divine rights ? Why do we even need older texts or scholars to explain this to us ? Isn’t it common sense that all authority & our loyalty ultimately belongs to Allah and these are temporary arrangements to run a country where most are not muslim ? /1

ٱنفِرُوا۟ خِفَافًا وَثِقَالًا وَجَـٰهِدُوا۟ بِأَمْوَٰلِكُمْ وَأَنفُسِكُمْ فِى سَبِيلِ ٱللَّهِ ۚ ذَٰلِكُمْ خَيْرٌ لَّكُمْ إِن كُنتُمْ تَعْلَمُونَ

It is an absolute transfer of divine rights which can have no legitimate difference of opinion. Democracy was built on this principle of legislation belonging to man and representatives taking that right to legislate on their behalf.

Your conclusions demonstrate that your ideology has no place in the US, a country founded on freedom. Your definition of freedom does not conform to ours. The spread of your ideology will soon be met with resistance that has historical roots to 1095. People are aware of taqqiya.

May Allah reward you for all your good intentions in Dawa

You better vote like your life depends on it, because for women it does!

Calling Muslims to participate in democracy isn't “different opinion” as you want to frame. You are clearly calling Muslims towards disobedience to Allah s.w.t. When one votes to a “Muslim” candidate, it is not actually voting to a person, rather, it is validation of Kufr.

The question is what do you consider lesser evil, and is it really the lesser evil?

The hopeless (useless) ppl in the comments. Love to complain but refuse to engage in real life.

This is where it gets dismissive. When you say if you don't agree then what's the alternative. That is the wrong question. You can't get a solution if you don't know the problem. It's a very simple minded refute to say if this is wrong then what's right.

The claim that only Allah holds unconditional legislative authority places ultimate sovereignty outside any human process, so democratic voting can at most be a temporary tactical accommodation rather than a consistent theological affirmation. When a system’s legitimacy rests on the premise that man made law is secondary or provisional, participation does not dissolve the prior rejection of that system’s foundational claim to authority. Majority scholarly permission for the lesser of two evils therefore records a pragmatic compromise, not a resolution of the structural tension between unalterable divine command and laws that citizens may revise by consent.

He started his career by blasphemous accusation towards auliya'Allah by writting articles in ny times. His face will be muddied before his death for his wala' never being strictly to muslims or islam but to his own fame and self righteousness

When the absolute idiots opinion is made equal to the knowledgeable, then know such a system will make sure that the masses in its society are absolute idiots.

What maslahah does a Muslim gain from disobeying Allah s.w.t. or joining a system of Kufr? Shouldn't Rasool Allah ﷺ have been the one to invoke the concept of maslahah and join the Qureysh system while his Sahabah were being brutally tortured?

YQ, we will never stop calling out your deviant views until you stop what you are doing or Muslims recognise what you are doing is wrong & unIsalmic and they stop following you.

Sheikh Wallah I feel your pain. May Allah reward you for your patience. I had a question, how can I contact you? I already emailed you but didn't recieve a response.

Anyone who disagrees with a country's established Constitution, established by the people of that country, should not move to that country & attempt to change it. America was never meant to be a theocracy, because history has shown REPEATEDLY how horribly THAT ENDS! Colonizers!

Takfir should obviously be avoided but the actual tangible alternative is the Khilafah for the Ummah For Muslims in the West, we can intellectually engage with prevailing system and question its legitimacy & efficacy in solving problems for people in general & give Islam's views

Why are Pakistanis Bangladeshis Africans the colonised lot want to go to the west to prosper? Speak..Sheikh
