Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

Go Home

🆕 OpenAI Developers Agents API gives developers a hosted sandbox where agents run tools, coordinate work, and handle complex tasks. Box Mount brings enterprise content directly into that sandbox as files the agent can read, reason across, and produce new work from, using normal shell commands and file paths...

227,650 views • 3 days ago •via X (Twitter)

12 Comments

Carter Rabasa's profile picture
Carter Rabasa3 days ago

@OpenAIDevs After ~20 years of cloud infra built around web servers, databases and APIs, it's amazing to see the Cambrian explosion of v2 cloud infra in the age of agents. Props to @OpenAIDevs for shipping compatibility with other sandboxes on Day One 😇

lifestep.io's profile picture
lifestep.io3 days ago

@OpenAIDevs Mounting real storage into an agent sandbox raises a question I got wrong for a while: which writes count as done. A tool call returning 200 is true about the call, not about whether the write landed. Reconcile from the store.

Ibesh's profile picture
Ibesh3 days ago

@OpenAIDevs the audit trail is the quiet casualty. once agents write back into the same folders, the history fills with machine edits and the person reading it cannot tell a fix from a mistake

BiOne_98's profile picture
BiOne_983 days ago

this is not “another Box tool for the agent.” It’s a POSIX layer over enterprise content inside OpenAI’s hosted Agents API sandbox. Box Mount exposes a Box folder as a normal filesystem (/workspace/deal-room/...) with two-way sync. The agent reads and writes with cat, find, and ordinary paths instead of custom file-transfer logic. Permissions, versions, and audit stay on Box. In the demo a lead agent mounts a deal room, reads 5 markdown sources, launches 3 specialist agents in parallel, and writes 4 reports back. When the MSA is updated in Box (v2), the mount syncs into the same sandbox and the agents reassess automatically. What’s interesting: harness + multi-agent + live mount instead of RAG/MCP per file. Watch-outs: sync latency and conflicts, “write completed” vs the write actually landing in the store, and private preview with no production SLA.

Adam Nofflett's profile picture
Adam Nofflett3 days ago

@OpenAIDevs I think you'll like this @jxnlco

秋山ユウ@決意@noter's profile picture
秋山ユウ@決意@noter3 days ago

@OpenAIDevs @grok 素人でも分かりやすいように解説して

安叫兽|Bird🕊️ 🔶 BNB's profile picture
安叫兽|Bird🕊️ 🔶 BNB3 days ago

@OpenAIDevs 把企业资料直接接进沙盒,省掉来回搬文件这一步了

AI Mastery Guide's profile picture
AI Mastery Guide3 days ago

@OpenAIDevs Box mount sounds huge for enterprise use

Danny Mehditash's profile picture
Danny Mehditash3 days ago

@OpenAIDevs Read with inherited ACLs is the right default. Write-back is a different grant. If produce-new-work lands in the source of truth, the mount is not a sandbox. It is a second employee with the user's files.

sophs j.'s profile picture
sophs j.3 days ago

@OpenAIDevs Great point!

Sebastian Buzdugan's profile picture
Sebastian Buzdugan3 days ago

@OpenAIDevs watched mounted files go stale during long sessions; version checks matter more than orchestration

Jack's profile picture
Jack3 days ago

@OpenAIDevs Enterprise content in an agent sandbox raises the same question every time: what the audit trail looks like when the agent edits a file four teams depend on.

Related Videos