Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

На главную

🆕 OpenAI Developers Agents API gives developers a hosted sandbox where agents run tools, coordinate work, and handle complex tasks. Box Mount brings enterprise content directly into that sandbox as files the agent can read, reason across, and produce new work from, using normal shell commands and file paths...

228,217 просмотров • 4 дней назад •via X (Twitter)

Комментарии: 12

Фото профиля Carter Rabasa
Carter Rabasa4 дней назад

@OpenAIDevs After ~20 years of cloud infra built around web servers, databases and APIs, it's amazing to see the Cambrian explosion of v2 cloud infra in the age of agents. Props to @OpenAIDevs for shipping compatibility with other sandboxes on Day One 😇

Фото профиля lifestep.io
lifestep.io3 дней назад

@OpenAIDevs Mounting real storage into an agent sandbox raises a question I got wrong for a while: which writes count as done. A tool call returning 200 is true about the call, not about whether the write landed. Reconcile from the store.

Фото профиля Ibesh
Ibesh3 дней назад

@OpenAIDevs the audit trail is the quiet casualty. once agents write back into the same folders, the history fills with machine edits and the person reading it cannot tell a fix from a mistake

Фото профиля BiOne_98
BiOne_983 дней назад

this is not “another Box tool for the agent.” It’s a POSIX layer over enterprise content inside OpenAI’s hosted Agents API sandbox. Box Mount exposes a Box folder as a normal filesystem (/workspace/deal-room/...) with two-way sync. The agent reads and writes with cat, find, and ordinary paths instead of custom file-transfer logic. Permissions, versions, and audit stay on Box. In the demo a lead agent mounts a deal room, reads 5 markdown sources, launches 3 specialist agents in parallel, and writes 4 reports back. When the MSA is updated in Box (v2), the mount syncs into the same sandbox and the agents reassess automatically. What’s interesting: harness + multi-agent + live mount instead of RAG/MCP per file. Watch-outs: sync latency and conflicts, “write completed” vs the write actually landing in the store, and private preview with no production SLA.

Фото профиля Adam Nofflett
Adam Nofflett4 дней назад

@OpenAIDevs I think you'll like this @jxnlco

Фото профиля 秋山ユウ@決意@noter
秋山ユウ@決意@noter3 дней назад

@OpenAIDevs @grok 素人でも分かりやすいように解説して

Фото профиля 安叫兽|Bird🕊️ 🔶 BNB
安叫兽|Bird🕊️ 🔶 BNB3 дней назад

@OpenAIDevs 把企业资料直接接进沙盒,省掉来回搬文件这一步了

Фото профиля AI Mastery Guide
AI Mastery Guide3 дней назад

@OpenAIDevs Box mount sounds huge for enterprise use

Фото профиля Danny Mehditash
Danny Mehditash3 дней назад

@OpenAIDevs Read with inherited ACLs is the right default. Write-back is a different grant. If produce-new-work lands in the source of truth, the mount is not a sandbox. It is a second employee with the user's files.

Фото профиля sophs j.
sophs j.3 дней назад

@OpenAIDevs Great point!

Фото профиля Sebastian Buzdugan
Sebastian Buzdugan3 дней назад

@OpenAIDevs watched mounted files go stale during long sessions; version checks matter more than orchestration

Фото профиля Jack
Jack3 дней назад

@OpenAIDevs Enterprise content in an agent sandbox raises the same question every time: what the audit trail looks like when the agent edits a file four teams depend on.

Похожие видео