正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

🆕 OpenAI Developers Agents API gives developers a hosted sandbox where agents run tools, coordinate work, and handle complex tasks. Box Mount brings enterprise content directly into that sandbox as files the agent can read, reason across, and produce new work from, using normal shell commands and file paths...

228,217 次观看 • 4 天前 •via X (Twitter)

12 条评论

Carter Rabasa 的头像
Carter Rabasa4 天前

@OpenAIDevs After ~20 years of cloud infra built around web servers, databases and APIs, it's amazing to see the Cambrian explosion of v2 cloud infra in the age of agents. Props to @OpenAIDevs for shipping compatibility with other sandboxes on Day One 😇

lifestep.io 的头像
lifestep.io3 天前

@OpenAIDevs Mounting real storage into an agent sandbox raises a question I got wrong for a while: which writes count as done. A tool call returning 200 is true about the call, not about whether the write landed. Reconcile from the store.

Ibesh 的头像
Ibesh3 天前

@OpenAIDevs the audit trail is the quiet casualty. once agents write back into the same folders, the history fills with machine edits and the person reading it cannot tell a fix from a mistake

BiOne_98 的头像
BiOne_983 天前

this is not “another Box tool for the agent.” It’s a POSIX layer over enterprise content inside OpenAI’s hosted Agents API sandbox. Box Mount exposes a Box folder as a normal filesystem (/workspace/deal-room/...) with two-way sync. The agent reads and writes with cat, find, and ordinary paths instead of custom file-transfer logic. Permissions, versions, and audit stay on Box. In the demo a lead agent mounts a deal room, reads 5 markdown sources, launches 3 specialist agents in parallel, and writes 4 reports back. When the MSA is updated in Box (v2), the mount syncs into the same sandbox and the agents reassess automatically. What’s interesting: harness + multi-agent + live mount instead of RAG/MCP per file. Watch-outs: sync latency and conflicts, “write completed” vs the write actually landing in the store, and private preview with no production SLA.

Adam Nofflett 的头像
Adam Nofflett4 天前

@OpenAIDevs I think you'll like this @jxnlco

秋山ユウ@決意@noter 的头像
秋山ユウ@決意@noter3 天前

@OpenAIDevs @grok 素人でも分かりやすいように解説して

安叫兽|Bird🕊️ 🔶 BNB 的头像
安叫兽|Bird🕊️ 🔶 BNB3 天前

@OpenAIDevs 把企业资料直接接进沙盒,省掉来回搬文件这一步了

AI Mastery Guide 的头像
AI Mastery Guide3 天前

@OpenAIDevs Box mount sounds huge for enterprise use

Danny Mehditash 的头像
Danny Mehditash3 天前

@OpenAIDevs Read with inherited ACLs is the right default. Write-back is a different grant. If produce-new-work lands in the source of truth, the mount is not a sandbox. It is a second employee with the user's files.

sophs j. 的头像
sophs j.3 天前

@OpenAIDevs Great point!

Sebastian Buzdugan 的头像
Sebastian Buzdugan3 天前

@OpenAIDevs watched mounted files go stale during long sessions; version checks matter more than orchestration

Jack 的头像
Jack3 天前

@OpenAIDevs Enterprise content in an agent sandbox raises the same question every time: what the audit trail looks like when the agent edits a file four teams depend on.

相关视频