Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Zur Startseite

OpenAI isn't just competing with Google. They're trying to completely replace them. And Sam Altman's latest moves prove it: He's building the most diverse engineering team in tech history - and paying them up to $10M/year to join. Here's the shocking reason why:

96,416 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr •via X (Twitter)

11 Kommentare

Profilbild von Vinay
Vinayvor 1 Jahr

Sam Altman just pulled off the greatest heist in corporate history: He's openly stealing Google's top engineers and paying them $10 Million/year. But money isn't the # 1 reason they're switching sides. Here's OpenAI's brilliant plan to dethrone Google forever: 🧵

Profilbild von Vinay
Vinayvor 1 Jahr

In the last 18 months, OpenAI has poached 85 Google employees. Half of them are engineers. But here's what's fascinating: Altman isn't just hiring seasoned veterans. He's breaking every Silicon Valley hiring rule...

Profilbild von Vinay
Vinayvor 1 Jahr

While most tech companies chase young talent or experienced pros, Altman takes a different path: He builds teams blending fresh grads with industry veterans. His belief? Innovation sparks when experience collides with inexperience. But AGE diversity is just the start...

Profilbild von Vinay
Vinayvor 1 Jahr

It's about diversity of thought. Young engineers bring fresh perspectives, questioning "why things are done this way." Veterans bring battle-tested wisdom and knowledge of what doesn't work. Together, they're unstoppable. But Altman's genius goes deeper:

Profilbild von Vinay
Vinayvor 1 Jahr

He's not just paying for talent - he's paying for belief in the mission. Those $5-10M compensation packages? They're mostly equity. Translation: These hires are betting their careers on OpenAI's success. And this reveals Altman's masterplan:

Profilbild von Vinay
Vinayvor 1 Jahr

He's not building another tech company. He's building the future of human-AI collaboration. Where Google organizes information, OpenAI wants to augment human intelligence itself. And the shift is already happening:

Profilbild von Vinay
Vinayvor 1 Jahr

Companies that embrace AI aren't just becoming more efficient. They're fundamentally transforming how work gets done. The winners will be those who can blend human creativity with AI capabilities. Look at platforms like Process Street:

Profilbild von Vinay
Vinayvor 1 Jahr

They're not just automating workflows. They're reimagining how businesses operate in an AI-first world. Creating systems where humans and AI work in perfect harmony. This is the future Altman sees:

Profilbild von Vinay
Vinayvor 1 Jahr

A world where AI doesn't replace humans, but amplifies their capabilities. Where experience and innovation combine to solve impossible problems. And it all starts with building the right team.

Profilbild von Vinay
Vinayvor 1 Jahr

Ready to automate success? Join the 3,000+ innovative companies building the future of work. From Salesforce to Slack, leaders trust Process Street to transform their operations with our revolutionary AI-powered automation. See why:

Profilbild von Vinay
Vinayvor 1 Jahr

I am Vinay Patankar: • Systems builder & automation pioneer • Founder of Process Street, leader in workflow automation • Passionate about making work flow effortlessly Follow for insights on building systems that scale Repost to help others grow ⚡️

Ähnliche Videos

Sam Altman just dropped the most insane business flex in tech history. OpenAI doing $13 BILLION in revenue this year. Projecting $100 BILLION by 2027. That's a 7.7X in revenue in 2 years. But they also just committed $1.4 TRILLION to infrastructure over 8 years. When a reporter asked "how the fuck are you paying for that?" Sam literally said: "We're doing WELL MORE revenue than reported. If you don't like it, I'll find someone to buy your shares." Then Satya Nadella (Microsoft CEO) just laughed. This is the most aggressive "fuck around and find out" energy I've ever seen from a CEO. OpenAI is literally spending 107X their current revenue on infrastructure. That's not a typo. ONE HUNDRED AND SEVEN TIMES Most cloud companies spend 15-30% of revenue on infrastructure. OpenAI? 10,700%. This is either: The biggest bet in tech history. OR The setup for the most catastrophic collapse since Theranos. And Sam's basically daring short-sellers to try him. "I would LOVE to see them get burned on that." Meanwhile they're losing $12 BILLION per quarter. Microsoft's latest earnings showed a $4 billion charge that implies OpenAI burned through $12B last quarter alone. But Sam doesn't care. He's doubling down. $300 billion deal with Oracle. $100 billion with Nvidia. Tens of billions more with AMD, Broadcom, and AWS. All while the company isn't even profitable. When the podcast host asked if OpenAI could hit $100 billion by 2028 or 2029... Sam cut him off and said: "How about '27?" This man is either: A) The next Elon Musk building the future. B) About to pull off the biggest financial implosion in tech history. There's literally no middle ground here. Either OpenAI becomes a trillion-dollar company. Or it goes down as the most expensive failure ever. And Sam's basically telling everyone who doubts him to short the stock so he can watch them burn...

Ricardo

429,960 Aufrufe • vor 8 Monaten

OpenAI just admitted Anthropic is KILLING their business. Their own applications chief told employees it was a "code red." Said Anthropic was a "wake-up call." Then admitted OpenAI had been "spreading efforts across too many apps" and it was "slowing them down." This is an internal confession. Here's why Anthropic is eating up OpenAI: 12 months ago, OpenAI owned 50% of all enterprise AI spending. Today it's just 27%. Anthropic went from nearly ZERO to winning 70% of every first-time enterprise AI deal. Seven out of ten companies buying AI tools for the first time are choosing Claude over ChatGPT. A year ago, one in 25 businesses on Ramp paid for Anthropic. Today it's one in four. OpenAI just had its biggest single-month adoption decline ever recorded. And Anthropic literally charges MORE than OpenAI for roughly the same performance. And businesses are STILL choosing them. In enterprise software, that never happens. The cheaper product usually wins. But Claude became something OpenAI never figured out how to be: Cool. Celebrities publicly switched to Claude. Senators are tweeting about using it. Engineers are shipping entire products with Claude Code in hours that used to take weeks. It started to became an identity signal. Like blue bubble vs green bubble in iMessage. Choosing Claude says something about you now. Meanwhile OpenAI went the opposite direction: They took the Pentagon contract that Anthropic refused. Greg Brockman donated $25 million to fund wars. ChatGPT uninstalls jumped 295% in a single day. Reddit posts saying "Cancel and Delete ChatGPT" got 30,000 upvotes. Anthropic said no to mass surveillance and autonomous weapons. Got blacklisted by the Pentagon. Trump called them a "Radical Left AI company." And their downloads went to #1 on the App Store the next day. Turns out refusing to build weapons is good marketing. But the real damage isn't consumer downloads. It's the MONEY. Claude Code hit $2.5 billion in annual revenue in six months. OpenAI's competing product Codex just barely crossed $1 billion. And Anthropic literally cannot meet demand. They're turning away paying customers because they don't have enough compute to serve them. A company REJECTING revenue because it's growing too fast. While OpenAI scrambles to consolidate. Last week OpenAI announced they're merging ChatGPT, Codex, and their browser into one "superapp." But what this really means: "We launched too many products, none of them worked well enough alone, so now we're cramming everything together and hoping it sticks." And remember their video tool Sora? Launched standalone. Hit #1 on the App Store. Usage flatlined within weeks. Now they're forced to shut it down. Their browser Atlas? Still hasn't launched publicly. Their IPO? Polymarket odds dropped from 55% to 35%. OpenAI has 900 million users. Anthropic has maybe 10 million daily actives. But here's the thing... OpenAI won the consumer war. ChatGPT is where your mom asks about recipes and your cousin makes memes. Anthropic won the war that actually MATTERS. The developers. The engineers. The enterprises writing 7 figure checks. OpenAI built the biggest chatbot on Earth. Anthropic built the tool that companies can't stop paying for. This is Yahoo vs Google all over again. Yahoo had the users. Google had the product. And we all know how that ended. OpenAI has 12 months to prove the superapp works, land the IPO, and stop the enterprise bleeding. If they can't, the most valuable startup in history becomes the most cautionary tale in tech. 900 million users don't mean anything if the people who actually pay are walking out the door. What do you think?

Ricardo

35,020 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten