Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Zur Startseite

OpenClaw just got 5x cheaper. Claude Sonnet 4.6 is basically Opus-level now, but costs 5x less. If you’re still running Opus, you’re burning money.

RoundtableSpace's profile picture

0xMarioNawfal

216,599 subscribers

75,776 Aufrufe • vor 6 Monaten •via X (Twitter)

Wissenschaft & TechnologieFinanzen
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Kommentare

Keine Kommentare verfügbar

Kommentare vom Original-Post werden hier angezeigt

Ähnliche Videos

Stop saying that Opus 4.6 is better than Opus 4.8. I just tested Claude Opus 4.8 (Right) and Claude Opus 4.6 (Left) on the same exact prompt. Claude Opus 4.8 completed it in less than 2 minutes. Claude Opus 4.6 "Garnished" for over 7 minutes. Stop using Opus 4.6.
0:23

Stop saying that Opus 4.6 is better than Opus 4.8. I just tested Claude Opus 4.8 (Right) and Claude Opus 4.6 (Left) on the same exact prompt. Claude Opus 4.8 completed it in less than 2 minutes. Claude Opus 4.6 "Garnished" for over 7 minutes. Stop using Opus 4.6.

BridgeMind

53,391 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

It happened. Anthropic banned OpenClaw from Claude subscriptions Here's the thing though: I figured out a way to use Opus 4.6 in OpenClaw without exploding your costs In this video I cover how to set up OpenClaw a way where you still get Opus power, but for significantly less:
16:40

It happened. Anthropic banned OpenClaw from Claude subscriptions Here's the thing though: I figured out a way to use Opus 4.6 in OpenClaw without exploding your costs In this video I cover how to set up OpenClaw a way where you still get Opus power, but for significantly less:

Alex Finn

43,085 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten

Claude Sonnet 4.6 vs GPT 5.3 Codex Same Prompt in Cursor (Neutral Harness) - Default Settings! GPT 5.3 Codex took - 2 mins Claude Sonnet 4.6 - 7 mins Cheaper than Sonnet 4.6! Faster than Sonnet 4.6! But I'm not sure if it's more craftier than Sonnet 4.6 because Sonnet's got a taste! Claude Sonnet 4.6 had a better result (aesthetically) and also more solid techstack - GPT 5.3 codes meanwhile just got the job done!
0:36

Claude Sonnet 4.6 vs GPT 5.3 Codex Same Prompt in Cursor (Neutral Harness) - Default Settings! GPT 5.3 Codex took - 2 mins Claude Sonnet 4.6 - 7 mins Cheaper than Sonnet 4.6! Faster than Sonnet 4.6! But I'm not sure if it's more craftier than Sonnet 4.6 because Sonnet's got a taste! Claude Sonnet 4.6 had a better result (aesthetically) and also more solid techstack - GPT 5.3 codes meanwhile just got the job done!

1LittleCoder💻

142,933 Aufrufe • vor 6 Monaten

Grok 4.5 operates at Opus-level intelligence and Sonnet-level pricing! We tested it against Claude Opus 4.8, Sonnet 5, and GLM 5.2 on a SpaceX mission: liftoff, stage sep, orbit insertion, satellite deploy. Grok 4.5 animates it more accurately and vividly than Sonnet 5 and GLM 5.2. Opus is the fastest and most expensive. Grok burns more tokens but still lands ~40% cheaper than Opus, and a bit under Sonnet 5. Time / tokens / cost: Grok 4.5 — / 35k / $0.69 Opus 4.8 — / 13.7k / $1.10 Sonnet 5 — / 22.1k / $0.78 GLM 5.2 — / 92.7k / $0.13 yet GLM did the whole mission for $0.13 😮
0:45

Grok 4.5 operates at Opus-level intelligence and Sonnet-level pricing! We tested it against Claude Opus 4.8, Sonnet 5, and GLM 5.2 on a SpaceX mission: liftoff, stage sep, orbit insertion, satellite deploy. Grok 4.5 animates it more accurately and vividly than Sonnet 5 and GLM 5.2. Opus is the fastest and most expensive. Grok burns more tokens but still lands ~40% cheaper than Opus, and a bit under Sonnet 5. Time / tokens / cost: Grok 4.5 — / 35k / $0.69 Opus 4.8 — / 13.7k / $1.10 Sonnet 5 — / 22.1k / $0.78 GLM 5.2 — / 92.7k / $0.13 yet GLM did the whole mission for $0.13 😮

GMI Cloud

150,809 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

OPUS 4.6 WAS NERFED DUE TO DEMAND BUT OPUS 4.5 DOES NOT SEEM TO BE HIT this guy ran the same test on both models. Opus 4.6 fails consistently but Opus 4.5 passes every time he switched back to Opus 4.5 on Claude Code and said "what a difference, feels like i got Opus back finally" he is now using this test as a "quantization canary" that runs it at the start of every session before doing real work. if it fails, the model is degraded. five Opus 4.6 windows in a row failed the untransparent nerfing is pushing people to cancel their Max plans if you've been feeling like Opus got dumber lately, you're not imagining it i'd suggest switching to Opus 4.5 to see the difference for yourself
1:03

OPUS 4.6 WAS NERFED DUE TO DEMAND BUT OPUS 4.5 DOES NOT SEEM TO BE HIT this guy ran the same test on both models. Opus 4.6 fails consistently but Opus 4.5 passes every time he switched back to Opus 4.5 on Claude Code and said "what a difference, feels like i got Opus back finally" he is now using this test as a "quantization canary" that runs it at the start of every session before doing real work. if it fails, the model is degraded. five Opus 4.6 windows in a row failed the untransparent nerfing is pushing people to cancel their Max plans if you've been feeling like Opus got dumber lately, you're not imagining it i'd suggest switching to Opus 4.5 to see the difference for yourself

Om Patel

696,175 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten

Stop what you're doing. Claude Opus 4.6 just released and it's incredible Both OpenClaw and Claude Code are 10x better with it It's now my daily driver for both In this video I cover EVERYTHING you need to know about Opus, and how to get the most out of it:
17:28

Stop what you're doing. Claude Opus 4.6 just released and it's incredible Both OpenClaw and Claude Code are 10x better with it It's now my daily driver for both In this video I cover EVERYTHING you need to know about Opus, and how to get the most out of it:

Alex Finn

72,614 Aufrufe • vor 7 Monaten

Claude Sonnet 4.6 just released, and it's incredible It's just as good as Opus for most agentic tasks, but faster and a fifth of the price In this video I show you all the key differences, how to hook this up to OpenClaw, and give you 2 mind blowing use cases you can use NOW:
13:18

Claude Sonnet 4.6 just released, and it's incredible It's just as good as Opus for most agentic tasks, but faster and a fifth of the price In this video I show you all the key differences, how to hook this up to OpenClaw, and give you 2 mind blowing use cases you can use NOW:

Alex Finn

101,167 Aufrufe • vor 6 Monaten

GPT-5.4 is my new default model for OpenClaw. For the last 2 months, Opus was the only model I felt could really unlock OpenClaw for serious agent tasks. GPT-5.4 is the first one that got close enough in quality to change that. In practice, it feels ~60% faster (73 tok/s vs 46), costs about half as much, and gives ~5x longer context. That combination makes OpenClaw much more snappy as a default. I tested it side by side against Opus 4.6 on deep research + slide generation, and the outputs are inspectable too. Full video below:
7:21

GPT-5.4 is my new default model for OpenClaw. For the last 2 months, Opus was the only model I felt could really unlock OpenClaw for serious agent tasks. GPT-5.4 is the first one that got close enough in quality to change that. In practice, it feels ~60% faster (73 tok/s vs 46), costs about half as much, and gives ~5x longer context. That combination makes OpenClaw much more snappy as a default. I tested it side by side against Opus 4.6 on deep research + slide generation, and the outputs are inspectable too. Full video below:

Quinn Leng

131,551 Aufrufe • vor 6 Monaten

MiniMax M2.1 vs Opus 4.5 vs GLM-4.7 built an interactive 3D solar system from scratch. Running on 3 Claude Code in parallel. The winner is: 🥇 GLM-4.7! 🥈 Opus 4.5 (slowest) 🥉 M2.1 (fastest) GLM-4.7 design capabilities are another level vs 4.6!
0:48

MiniMax M2.1 vs Opus 4.5 vs GLM-4.7 built an interactive 3D solar system from scratch. Running on 3 Claude Code in parallel. The winner is: 🥇 GLM-4.7! 🥈 Opus 4.5 (slowest) 🥉 M2.1 (fastest) GLM-4.7 design capabilities are another level vs 4.6!

Ivan Fioravanti ᯅ

81,630 Aufrufe • vor 8 Monaten

Anthropic just gave OpenClaw the green light Anthropic staff confirmed that CLI-based usage is sanctioned. We’ve successfully bridged the Claude Code CLI directly into the OpenClaw gateway, letting you run your entire agent fleet on your Pro/Max plan and no additional API tokens required. The Implementation: - Auth: Log in to Claude Code locally: claude auth login - Path: Grab your binary location: which claude - Bridge: Drop the path into your openclaw.json under agents.defaults: "cliBackends": { "claude-cli": { "args": [ "-p", "--output-format", "json" ], "command": " ", "input": "arg", "output": "json", "serialize": true, "sessionArg": "--session-id", "sessionMode": "existing" } }, "model": { "primary": "claude-cli/claude-opus-4-6" }, "models": { "claude-cli/claude-opus-4-6": {}, "claude-cli/claude-opus-4-7": {}, "claude-cli/claude-sonnet-4-6": {} }, The Result: OpenClaw reuses your local session IDs and subscription limits. You get the full power of Opus and Sonnet without the restricted OAuth endpoints or the API tax. They sanctioned the path. We built the bridge. Here is a video how I done it step by step:
1:09

Anthropic just gave OpenClaw the green light Anthropic staff confirmed that CLI-based usage is sanctioned. We’ve successfully bridged the Claude Code CLI directly into the OpenClaw gateway, letting you run your entire agent fleet on your Pro/Max plan and no additional API tokens required. The Implementation: - Auth: Log in to Claude Code locally: claude auth login - Path: Grab your binary location: which claude - Bridge: Drop the path into your openclaw.json under agents.defaults: "cliBackends": { "claude-cli": { "args": [ "-p", "--output-format", "json" ], "command": " ", "input": "arg", "output": "json", "serialize": true, "sessionArg": "--session-id", "sessionMode": "existing" } }, "model": { "primary": "claude-cli/claude-opus-4-6" }, "models": { "claude-cli/claude-opus-4-6": {}, "claude-cli/claude-opus-4-7": {}, "claude-cli/claude-sonnet-4-6": {} }, The Result: OpenClaw reuses your local session IDs and subscription limits. You get the full power of Opus and Sonnet without the restricted OAuth endpoints or the API tax. They sanctioned the path. We built the bridge. Here is a video how I done it step by step:

Ziwen

184,009 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten

Happycapy is now open to everyone 🚀 The agent-native computer, in your browser, and now on your phone. > Powered by Claude Code + MiniMax, including Opus 4.6 and Minimax M2.5 > Your own secure cloud sandbox > Run agent teams. Automate task Not just another OpenClaw. It’s all-in-one. No installs. Just run.
1:42

Happycapy is now open to everyone 🚀 The agent-native computer, in your browser, and now on your phone. > Powered by Claude Code + MiniMax, including Opus 4.6 and Minimax M2.5 > Your own secure cloud sandbox > Run agent teams. Automate task Not just another OpenClaw. It’s all-in-one. No installs. Just run.

Jarod Xu

1,106,114 Aufrufe • vor 7 Monaten

pretty impressed that MiniMax (official) 2.7 can one-shot a linear clone in 10 mins at 95% cheaper than claude opus 4.6 not enough people know about this model. if you're just using whatever your timeline is hyping, you're probably overpaying for the same result
0:33

pretty impressed that MiniMax (official) 2.7 can one-shot a linear clone in 10 mins at 95% cheaper than claude opus 4.6 not enough people know about this model. if you're just using whatever your timeline is hyping, you're probably overpaying for the same result

Sherry Jiang is at ai engineer singapore

140,954 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten

Claude Sonnet 4.8 is imminent. Most likely dropping today. Sonnet 4.6 is starting to look outdated. Look at the Flappy Bird test on BridgeBench. GPT 5.5 and Claude Opus 4.7 have moved past it. The model that used to be the default for most vibe coders is falling behind. Anthropic needs Sonnet 4.8 to close the gap. The second it drops, we're running it through every BridgeBench test and posting the results live. New Sonnet day. Let's see what Anthropic has.
0:28

Claude Sonnet 4.8 is imminent. Most likely dropping today. Sonnet 4.6 is starting to look outdated. Look at the Flappy Bird test on BridgeBench. GPT 5.5 and Claude Opus 4.7 have moved past it. The model that used to be the default for most vibe coders is falling behind. Anthropic needs Sonnet 4.8 to close the gap. The second it drops, we're running it through every BridgeBench test and posting the results live. New Sonnet day. Let's see what Anthropic has.

Bridgebench

16,715 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

Grok 4.5 is a "Wow!" moment. 🤯 > Opus 4.8 & GPT-5.5 level on benchmarks > Costs less than Sonnet 5 Is that real? Hard to believe. Added Grok 4.5 as an implementer agent in fable-advisor. It replaces Sonnet 5. Use Fable as the orchestrator and a combo of: 1. Grok 4.5 2. Opus 4.8 3. GPT-5.5 As implementer agents. Uses the Grok Build CLI so if you log in with an X premium account you don't have to pay API fees.
0:20

Grok 4.5 is a "Wow!" moment. 🤯 > Opus 4.8 & GPT-5.5 level on benchmarks > Costs less than Sonnet 5 Is that real? Hard to believe. Added Grok 4.5 as an implementer agent in fable-advisor. It replaces Sonnet 5. Use Fable as the orchestrator and a combo of: 1. Grok 4.5 2. Opus 4.8 3. GPT-5.5 As implementer agents. Uses the Grok Build CLI so if you log in with an X premium account you don't have to pay API fees.

Dan McAteer

191,618 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

ex-Apple engineer gave Grok 4.6 - 30 minutes to redesign a live app, then showed the GrokBot run that merged its own PRs: "GrokBot runs 20-30 agents in parallel while Hermes and OpenClaw run one. Same weights, 20x the throughput - and the agents keep improving from their own runs." Grok 4.6 runs 5x cheaper on input and 8x on output - $2 and $6 per million. his verdict: this is an easy Opus replacement worth more than any $500 course on agentic engineering watch today, then read the article below on building a self-running agent stack
28:05

ex-Apple engineer gave Grok 4.6 - 30 minutes to redesign a live app, then showed the GrokBot run that merged its own PRs: "GrokBot runs 20-30 agents in parallel while Hermes and OpenClaw run one. Same weights, 20x the throughput - and the agents keep improving from their own runs." Grok 4.6 runs 5x cheaper on input and 8x on output - $2 and $6 per million. his verdict: this is an easy Opus replacement worth more than any $500 course on agentic engineering watch today, then read the article below on building a self-running agent stack

Carnage

82,530 Aufrufe • vor 18 Tagen

It's Claude Code, but for video. Gave it one sentence. Got back a finished explainer: script, GPT Image 2 visuals, voiceover, edited. 👇 this is the output runs on Opus. unlimited length. costs cents.
0:28

It's Claude Code, but for video. Gave it one sentence. Got back a finished explainer: script, GPT Image 2 visuals, voiceover, edited. 👇 this is the output runs on Opus. unlimited length. costs cents.

Aryan Rakib

44,883 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten

Claude Opus 4.8 beats Opus 4.7, GPT-5.5, and Gemini 3.1 Pro !! We ran a multimodal gaming comparison across these four closed source models. Opus 4.8 took the longest to generate, but it came out ahead, capturing the most elements from the prompt and successfully hitting the rival cars. GPT 5.5 is still good, but Gemini is no longer the best multimodal model now
0:23

Claude Opus 4.8 beats Opus 4.7, GPT-5.5, and Gemini 3.1 Pro !! We ran a multimodal gaming comparison across these four closed source models. Opus 4.8 took the longest to generate, but it came out ahead, capturing the most elements from the prompt and successfully hitting the rival cars. GPT 5.5 is still good, but Gemini is no longer the best multimodal model now

GMI Cloud

116,538 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

Claude Opus 4.8 is LIVE on AIMLAPI - Hour 0 availability! ~4x less likely to let code flaws slip through vs 4.7 Fast mode 2.5x speed, now 3x cheaper Same price: $5/$25 per M tokens To celebrate, it's FREE for selected commentators
0:21

Claude Opus 4.8 is LIVE on AIMLAPI - Hour 0 availability! ~4x less likely to let code flaws slip through vs 4.7 Fast mode 2.5x speed, now 3x cheaper Same price: $5/$25 per M tokens To celebrate, it's FREE for selected commentators

AI/ML API

44,740 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

Someone found a way to get Claude Opus 4.7 for FREE. Amazon's coding platform is giving away a full month of Pro Plus - 2,000 credits, zero charge. The platform is Kura - Amazon's AI coding tool. Web interface, IDE like Cursor, and CLI like Claude Code. One month free on any paid plan, including Pro Plus at $40. > Here's the exact flow: Go to ko.()dev -> create account via Google or GitHub -> hit "Upgrade to unlock plus" -> select Pro Plus ($40 plan) -> promo applies at checkout -> $0 charged -> card required but nothing debited. You get access to Claude Opus 4.7, Sonnet 4.6, and Opus 4.6. Up to 2,000 credits for the month. The CLI demo shows Claude Opus 4.7 building a full developer landing page from a single prompt - generates the code, creates the files, spins up a local server. Same output you'd get from Claude Code Max at $100/month. Cancel before the trial ends if you dont want to pay. Settings -> Manage Plan -> Cancel. This promotion can end at any time. The window is open right now.
5:51

Someone found a way to get Claude Opus 4.7 for FREE. Amazon's coding platform is giving away a full month of Pro Plus - 2,000 credits, zero charge. The platform is Kura - Amazon's AI coding tool. Web interface, IDE like Cursor, and CLI like Claude Code. One month free on any paid plan, including Pro Plus at $40. > Here's the exact flow: Go to ko.()dev -> create account via Google or GitHub -> hit "Upgrade to unlock plus" -> select Pro Plus ($40 plan) -> promo applies at checkout -> $0 charged -> card required but nothing debited. You get access to Claude Opus 4.7, Sonnet 4.6, and Opus 4.6. Up to 2,000 credits for the month. The CLI demo shows Claude Opus 4.7 building a full developer landing page from a single prompt - generates the code, creates the files, spins up a local server. Same output you'd get from Claude Code Max at $100/month. Cancel before the trial ends if you dont want to pay. Settings -> Manage Plan -> Cancel. This promotion can end at any time. The window is open right now.

Atenov int.

40,540 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

If you’re NOT regularly demonstrating progressive overload, there is a ZERO PERCENT CHANCE you’ve built muscle Doesn’t matter if you’re hitting the gym 5x a week Doesn’t matter if you’re always sore Doesn’t matter if you always get a great pump Doesn’t matter if you’re consuming 1 gram of protein per pound of bodyweight Still a big fat ZERO percent chance Hope this helps!
0:30

If you’re NOT regularly demonstrating progressive overload, there is a ZERO PERCENT CHANCE you’ve built muscle Doesn’t matter if you’re hitting the gym 5x a week Doesn’t matter if you’re always sore Doesn’t matter if you always get a great pump Doesn’t matter if you’re consuming 1 gram of protein per pound of bodyweight Still a big fat ZERO percent chance Hope this helps!

Dean Turner

143,234 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat