Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

На главную

OPINION: WHY LEGACY MEDIA'S WAR ON BREAKTHROUGHS IS HOLDING US ALL BACK It's honestly exhausting watching the big news outlets pull this stunt every time something groundbreaking drops. A fresh AI breakthrough hits that could revolutionize drug discovery or protein folding, and suddenly the front pages are screaming about...

MarioNawfal's profile picture

Mario Nawfal

2,712,997 subscribers

13,987 просмотров • 8 месяцев назад •via X (Twitter)

Новости и политикаОбразованиеНаука и технологии
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

Комментарии: 0

Нет доступных комментариев

Здесь появятся комментарии из оригинального поста

Похожие видео

🚨🇺🇸 BREAKING - CBS ANCHOR DROPS THE ACT: "LEGACY MEDIA LOST TRUST BECAUSE IT MISSED TOO MANY STORIES" Finally, a mainstream voice owning up to the mess. CBS's Tony Dokoupil gets real on why folks don't buy what the press is selling anymore, from NAFTA flubs to COVID cover-ups, and yeah, that Hunter laptop fiasco: "A lot has changed since the first person sat in this chair. But for me, the biggest difference is people do not trust us like they used to. And it's not just us. It's all of legacy media. And I get it. I get it because I've been hearing about it from just about everybody for more than 20 years as I've traveled America on this assignment or that. My mom's neighbors in West Virginia, my own neighbors in NYC. Thousands and thousands of conversations in between. Sometimes people want to talk to me about our coverage of NAFTA or the Iraq war. Other times it's all about Hillary Clinton's emails or Russiagate. Or more recently, COVID lockdowns, Hunter Biden's laptop or the president's fitness for office. The point is on too many stories, the press has missed the story because we've taken into account the perspective of advocates and not the average American. Or we put too much weight in the analysis of academics or elites and not enough on you. And I know this because at certain points, I have been you. I have felt this way too. I felt like what I was seeing and hearing on the news didn't reflect what I was seeing and hearing in my own life and that the most urgent questions simply weren't being asked." About time someone inside admits the echo chamber's killing credibility. Props to him for calling it out, but will it change anything? Source: CBS News, Breaking911
2:17

🚨🇺🇸 BREAKING - CBS ANCHOR DROPS THE ACT: "LEGACY MEDIA LOST TRUST BECAUSE IT MISSED TOO MANY STORIES" Finally, a mainstream voice owning up to the mess. CBS's Tony Dokoupil gets real on why folks don't buy what the press is selling anymore, from NAFTA flubs to COVID cover-ups, and yeah, that Hunter laptop fiasco: "A lot has changed since the first person sat in this chair. But for me, the biggest difference is people do not trust us like they used to. And it's not just us. It's all of legacy media. And I get it. I get it because I've been hearing about it from just about everybody for more than 20 years as I've traveled America on this assignment or that. My mom's neighbors in West Virginia, my own neighbors in NYC. Thousands and thousands of conversations in between. Sometimes people want to talk to me about our coverage of NAFTA or the Iraq war. Other times it's all about Hillary Clinton's emails or Russiagate. Or more recently, COVID lockdowns, Hunter Biden's laptop or the president's fitness for office. The point is on too many stories, the press has missed the story because we've taken into account the perspective of advocates and not the average American. Or we put too much weight in the analysis of academics or elites and not enough on you. And I know this because at certain points, I have been you. I have felt this way too. I felt like what I was seeing and hearing on the news didn't reflect what I was seeing and hearing in my own life and that the most urgent questions simply weren't being asked." About time someone inside admits the echo chamber's killing credibility. Props to him for calling it out, but will it change anything? Source: CBS News, Breaking911

Mario Nawfal

218,503 просмотров • 7 месяцев назад

For 20+ years, we've stayed ahead of every major shift in technology. Today we take the next one: we're introducing the world's first AI-native tech services model. Most of the industry is adding AI to the way it already works. Like bolting a copilot onto old processes and calling it transformation because it's faster than before. That's not what enterprises actually need. works differently. It provides instant access to AI Pods (service units run by AI agents and supervised by Globant experts) that deliver tech services at machine speed, but with the rigor, the governance, and the quality that enterprise-grade work demands. It is a smarter model, running the right AI through parallel agents, loops, workflows, and deterministic processes. With organizations access AI services with transparent, output or consumption-linked pricing, not per hour or per seat, and they own everything they produce. We are bringing the speed AI promises, with the rigor and quality any business needs. Join the waitlist at
0:48

For 20+ years, we've stayed ahead of every major shift in technology. Today we take the next one: we're introducing the world's first AI-native tech services model. Most of the industry is adding AI to the way it already works. Like bolting a copilot onto old processes and calling it transformation because it's faster than before. That's not what enterprises actually need. works differently. It provides instant access to AI Pods (service units run by AI agents and supervised by Globant experts) that deliver tech services at machine speed, but with the rigor, the governance, and the quality that enterprise-grade work demands. It is a smarter model, running the right AI through parallel agents, loops, workflows, and deterministic processes. With organizations access AI services with transparent, output or consumption-linked pricing, not per hour or per seat, and they own everything they produce. We are bringing the speed AI promises, with the rigor and quality any business needs. Join the waitlist at

Martin Migoya

389,589 просмотров • 10 дней назад

In the world of limited-hangouts and tickle-truthing, the name of the game is to admit a small piece of something everybody already suspects. In this case, it’s now suddenly OK to observe and report on Biden’s obvious age-related mental decline. But why now? Why not 4 years ago?? Or 3? Or 2? Or 6 months ago? Obviously, it’s OK now because somebody somewhere made that decision. But why? And why isn’t Team Biden campaigning in any meaningful way? Is it because they are that confident? Or is it because they know there won’t be an election at all and so aren’t putting any resources into an unnecessary activity? Back at Peak Prosperity, we discuss the possibility that the powers that be are aware of an impending war with Russia, which might lead the US to adopt the 'our Democracy' policies of Ukraine, including the suspension of all elections due to the war.. On that front, Russia just referred to the US – for the first time in Putin’s entire tenure – as “an enemy” This is a big development, as are the NATO plans to move troops to the front and US Congresscritters openly calling for automatic enrolment of 18-25-year-old men in the US Draft system (aka ‘selective service’). As fast of an adjuster as I am, I just can’t keep up… #BidenIsAJoke #BidenAdministration #PoliticalTurbulance #decisions
14:24

In the world of limited-hangouts and tickle-truthing, the name of the game is to admit a small piece of something everybody already suspects. In this case, it’s now suddenly OK to observe and report on Biden’s obvious age-related mental decline. But why now? Why not 4 years ago?? Or 3? Or 2? Or 6 months ago? Obviously, it’s OK now because somebody somewhere made that decision. But why? And why isn’t Team Biden campaigning in any meaningful way? Is it because they are that confident? Or is it because they know there won’t be an election at all and so aren’t putting any resources into an unnecessary activity? Back at Peak Prosperity, we discuss the possibility that the powers that be are aware of an impending war with Russia, which might lead the US to adopt the 'our Democracy' policies of Ukraine, including the suspension of all elections due to the war.. On that front, Russia just referred to the US – for the first time in Putin’s entire tenure – as “an enemy” This is a big development, as are the NATO plans to move troops to the front and US Congresscritters openly calling for automatic enrolment of 18-25-year-old men in the US Draft system (aka ‘selective service’). As fast of an adjuster as I am, I just can’t keep up… #BidenIsAJoke #BidenAdministration #PoliticalTurbulance #decisions

Peak Prosperity

20,138 просмотров • 2 лет назад

DeFi will become far more important than most people realise. And not because more people start using it. Because the users stop being people at all. When you think about it DeFi is actually better suited to machines than it is to us. An agent doesn't need a website, or buttons, or a front end. You can strip all of it away and just let the agent plug straight into the protocol, do the job, and leave. Now play it forward… An AI agent taking out a flash loan at 3 am, another paying half a cent for a bit of data to a different agent, and one moving its treasury across three chains in a second because a swap suddenly got cheaper somewhere. Genuinely hard to wrap your head around… but this is the user base DeFi ends up serving. This is the Economic Singularity I've been telling you about at the ground level, where the financial system is being rebuilt for users with no faces, no emotions, and no need for downtime.
1:25

DeFi will become far more important than most people realise. And not because more people start using it. Because the users stop being people at all. When you think about it DeFi is actually better suited to machines than it is to us. An agent doesn't need a website, or buttons, or a front end. You can strip all of it away and just let the agent plug straight into the protocol, do the job, and leave. Now play it forward… An AI agent taking out a flash loan at 3 am, another paying half a cent for a bit of data to a different agent, and one moving its treasury across three chains in a second because a swap suddenly got cheaper somewhere. Genuinely hard to wrap your head around… but this is the user base DeFi ends up serving. This is the Economic Singularity I've been telling you about at the ground level, where the financial system is being rebuilt for users with no faces, no emotions, and no need for downtime.

Raoul Pal

84,596 просмотров • 10 дней назад

Arthur Herman on why China's real threat is not a Taiwan invasion but the race for AI and energy dominance: "A lot of the energy and time is spent focused on the possibility of a kinetic conflict over the Straits of Taiwan. We're missing what the larger picture is. China's interest in launching such a kinetic conflict, win, lose, or draw, are overwhelmingly unfavorable to the outcome they want." "The outcome they want is to absorb Taiwan, not to conquer it or destroy it. To make it piece by piece, step by step, part of the larger communist enterprise." "If China really were hell-bent on bringing about a kinetic conquest of Taiwan, they would have taken advantage of our engagement in Iran and in the Straits of Hormuz a long time ago. But they didn't do it because tangling with America in any kind of kinetic conflict is a much more difficult proposition than they want to take on." "The big picture is the race for AI dominance, the race for energy dominance. That's where the real struggle with China is going to be played out. That's where we've got the real advantage." Arthur Herman
4:01

Arthur Herman on why China's real threat is not a Taiwan invasion but the race for AI and energy dominance: "A lot of the energy and time is spent focused on the possibility of a kinetic conflict over the Straits of Taiwan. We're missing what the larger picture is. China's interest in launching such a kinetic conflict, win, lose, or draw, are overwhelmingly unfavorable to the outcome they want." "The outcome they want is to absorb Taiwan, not to conquer it or destroy it. To make it piece by piece, step by step, part of the larger communist enterprise." "If China really were hell-bent on bringing about a kinetic conquest of Taiwan, they would have taken advantage of our engagement in Iran and in the Straits of Hormuz a long time ago. But they didn't do it because tangling with America in any kind of kinetic conflict is a much more difficult proposition than they want to take on." "The big picture is the race for AI dominance, the race for energy dominance. That's where the real struggle with China is going to be played out. That's where we've got the real advantage." Arthur Herman

MTS

35,530 просмотров • 9 дней назад

.Naval: The easiest way to see that AI is not taking jobs but creating opportunities is to go learn AI and then reapply for the job that rejected you. Watch how they pull you in. “My last startup, Airchat, could not have existed without AI because we needed the transcription/translation. And even the current thing I’m working on—it’s not an AI company, but it cannot exist without AI. It is relying on AI. Even at AngelList, we’re significantly adopting AI. Like everywhere you turn, it’s more opportunity, more opportunity, more opportunity. And people like to go on Twitter—or the artist formerly known as Twitter—and basically, they like to exaggerate. Like, ‘Oh my God, we’ve hit AGI.’ ‘Oh my God, I just replaced all my mid-level engineers.’ ‘Oh my God, I’ve stopped hiring.’ To me, that’s moronic. The two valid perspectives are the one-man entrepreneur shows, where there’s one guy or one gal, and they’re scaling up like crazy thanks to AI. Or there are people who are embracing AI and being like, ‘I need to hire, and I need to hire anyone who can even spell ‘AI’—anyone who’s even used AI. Just come on in, come on in.’ Again, I would say the easiest way to see that AI is not taking jobs but creating opportunities is this: go brush up on your AI, learn a little bit, watch a few videos, use the AI, tinker with it, and then go reapply for that job that rejected you. Watch how they pull you in.”
1:10

.Naval: The easiest way to see that AI is not taking jobs but creating opportunities is to go learn AI and then reapply for the job that rejected you. Watch how they pull you in. “My last startup, Airchat, could not have existed without AI because we needed the transcription/translation. And even the current thing I’m working on—it’s not an AI company, but it cannot exist without AI. It is relying on AI. Even at AngelList, we’re significantly adopting AI. Like everywhere you turn, it’s more opportunity, more opportunity, more opportunity. And people like to go on Twitter—or the artist formerly known as Twitter—and basically, they like to exaggerate. Like, ‘Oh my God, we’ve hit AGI.’ ‘Oh my God, I just replaced all my mid-level engineers.’ ‘Oh my God, I’ve stopped hiring.’ To me, that’s moronic. The two valid perspectives are the one-man entrepreneur shows, where there’s one guy or one gal, and they’re scaling up like crazy thanks to AI. Or there are people who are embracing AI and being like, ‘I need to hire, and I need to hire anyone who can even spell ‘AI’—anyone who’s even used AI. Just come on in, come on in.’ Again, I would say the easiest way to see that AI is not taking jobs but creating opportunities is this: go brush up on your AI, learn a little bit, watch a few videos, use the AI, tinker with it, and then go reapply for that job that rejected you. Watch how they pull you in.”

Arjun Khemani

167,746 просмотров • 1 год назад

"It's a superhero movie that is for adults and has adult ideas in it. You don't have to think about it any harder than that. It goes way deeper. If you want to, you can tear it apart like a giant onion and keep peeling it until you're at its core. "But I think that it's cool to experience it just like when I read the comic book for the first time and I didn't know. No one was telling me what it's about or the why of it. You come to it fresh. And sometimes I wish I had that experience because I would love to see the movie or read the book for the first time again because that feeling was for me awesome. "Especially when you go into something with this anticipation that it's just a Hollywood superhero movie which is what a lot of people will think because they don't know. They see some guys fighting and then when you see the film you actually have this experience of it being taken apart. "Those archetypes, those mythological shapes, whether they be Batman or Superman or any of superheroes and how they're just turned around. Whether it's through sexual fetish or fighting, actually killing guys they fight. "Stuff like that or whether it's the end of the movie and there's this moral dilemma that is the end of the movie is also challenging on all those levels."
1:38

"It's a superhero movie that is for adults and has adult ideas in it. You don't have to think about it any harder than that. It goes way deeper. If you want to, you can tear it apart like a giant onion and keep peeling it until you're at its core. "But I think that it's cool to experience it just like when I read the comic book for the first time and I didn't know. No one was telling me what it's about or the why of it. You come to it fresh. And sometimes I wish I had that experience because I would love to see the movie or read the book for the first time again because that feeling was for me awesome. "Especially when you go into something with this anticipation that it's just a Hollywood superhero movie which is what a lot of people will think because they don't know. They see some guys fighting and then when you see the film you actually have this experience of it being taken apart. "Those archetypes, those mythological shapes, whether they be Batman or Superman or any of superheroes and how they're just turned around. Whether it's through sexual fetish or fighting, actually killing guys they fight. "Stuff like that or whether it's the end of the movie and there's this moral dilemma that is the end of the movie is also challenging on all those levels."

Zack Snyder Film

22,225 просмотров • 7 месяцев назад

Younger American says the Boomer Generation doesn’t understand what’s going on in America, and was misled “Boomers are the only generation who has had more than what their parents had and more than what their children had. They've had more than any other generation in history, and they were told, and wrongly so, that this was because of their own merit. And because this belief in meritocracy runs deep with them, they actually think that it's our fault that the world is the way that it is. It's really not fair for us to be constantly gaslit by these people who had so much privilege and could buy a house on $16 an hour, or the equivalent they could buy a house for double minimum wage. I'm making double minimum wage right now, and I can't afford to move outta my parents' house” She then explains how the Boomer Generation is hoarding the wealth with no plans to ever let it go, even in passing
1:02

Younger American says the Boomer Generation doesn’t understand what’s going on in America, and was misled “Boomers are the only generation who has had more than what their parents had and more than what their children had. They've had more than any other generation in history, and they were told, and wrongly so, that this was because of their own merit. And because this belief in meritocracy runs deep with them, they actually think that it's our fault that the world is the way that it is. It's really not fair for us to be constantly gaslit by these people who had so much privilege and could buy a house on $16 an hour, or the equivalent they could buy a house for double minimum wage. I'm making double minimum wage right now, and I can't afford to move outta my parents' house” She then explains how the Boomer Generation is hoarding the wealth with no plans to ever let it go, even in passing

Wall Street Apes

82,627 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад

LOS40 Chile talking about jimin and “Who” success in Chile with a whole MUSE coded setup 😭 🗣️… remained continuously among the most listened-to songs in Chile, adding more than 730 days on the chart and more than 120 days at number one. And also, making history by becoming the first song by an Asian artist to surpass 100 million streams on Spotify Chile. I have my theory, Meli must have hers... What is yours on why this song hits so hard? 👩🏻‍🦰: Because it's Jimin! (laughs) Yeah, because it's Jimin—that's the main reason! It's a song that... it motivates you, more than anything. I mean, in any everyday situation you might be in, at home or at work—at least for me—it motivates you. It has a very retro style. So, we can also see something more versatile from Jimin in something new, because... we were already coming off something different with FACE, and coming—arriving with MUSE... it's all new. And I think this sound fits him perfectly, so... it's interesting and it's... comforting to see that they continue loving it even after two years since the album was released. 🗣️ : wow ! Because I feel like it has a bit to do with that. It's like a phenomenon that doesn't just have to do with... Jimin's fans in general, BTS fans, or fans overall, but rather that it's a song that a lot of people like without even knowing whose song it is. 👩🏻: Exactly! Yes, because... that's what I thought. I know that we love Jimin, and that's one of the reasons why fans listens to it so much, but... the lady who doesn't know who BTS is, who stumbled upon this song and has it on repeat... maybe she reached it because she loved the rhythm, or I also imagine a guy listening to it because it reminds him of 80s or 90s artists... So I think it brings together so many elements that make it multi-target 👩🏻‍🦰: Yes! Like, 'they'll like it at...' I play it at work, and many people who are already around 50 listen to it and, clear enough, they see that rhythm like from the 80s. Yes, that's what's striking about the song.
1:57

LOS40 Chile talking about jimin and “Who” success in Chile with a whole MUSE coded setup 😭 🗣️… remained continuously among the most listened-to songs in Chile, adding more than 730 days on the chart and more than 120 days at number one. And also, making history by becoming the first song by an Asian artist to surpass 100 million streams on Spotify Chile. I have my theory, Meli must have hers... What is yours on why this song hits so hard? 👩🏻‍🦰: Because it's Jimin! (laughs) Yeah, because it's Jimin—that's the main reason! It's a song that... it motivates you, more than anything. I mean, in any everyday situation you might be in, at home or at work—at least for me—it motivates you. It has a very retro style. So, we can also see something more versatile from Jimin in something new, because... we were already coming off something different with FACE, and coming—arriving with MUSE... it's all new. And I think this sound fits him perfectly, so... it's interesting and it's... comforting to see that they continue loving it even after two years since the album was released. 🗣️ : wow ! Because I feel like it has a bit to do with that. It's like a phenomenon that doesn't just have to do with... Jimin's fans in general, BTS fans, or fans overall, but rather that it's a song that a lot of people like without even knowing whose song it is. 👩🏻: Exactly! Yes, because... that's what I thought. I know that we love Jimin, and that's one of the reasons why fans listens to it so much, but... the lady who doesn't know who BTS is, who stumbled upon this song and has it on repeat... maybe she reached it because she loved the rhythm, or I also imagine a guy listening to it because it reminds him of 80s or 90s artists... So I think it brings together so many elements that make it multi-target 👩🏻‍🦰: Yes! Like, 'they'll like it at...' I play it at work, and many people who are already around 50 listen to it and, clear enough, they see that rhythm like from the 80s. Yes, that's what's striking about the song.

cocojm⁷

22,492 просмотров • 13 дней назад

Blackfiles videos are so good it made me realize that it doesn't make sense for me to spend a month on a 3d video anymore not because i can't or because i don't enjoy it... it's because ai does it better now i'm not bitter or resentfull about it... fuck, i still find joy in creating and i'll keep doing 3d for that feeling alone... but i can't fin a practical way in which this stuff is worth grinding months for? i'll just merge with AI, that's the way i'll find other creative things to do when i have free time, like growing a farm, or build a house for my dog or whatever... but no fucking way i am spending more than a month making a video anymore
0:42

Blackfiles videos are so good it made me realize that it doesn't make sense for me to spend a month on a 3d video anymore not because i can't or because i don't enjoy it... it's because ai does it better now i'm not bitter or resentfull about it... fuck, i still find joy in creating and i'll keep doing 3d for that feeling alone... but i can't fin a practical way in which this stuff is worth grinding months for? i'll just merge with AI, that's the way i'll find other creative things to do when i have free time, like growing a farm, or build a house for my dog or whatever... but no fucking way i am spending more than a month making a video anymore

Boring Always Bored

70,587 просмотров • 6 месяцев назад

My take on it all is the average Canadian is not that stupid, and they understand the importance of having economic ties with US and many countries around the world. To say that we're not going to do business with a country that, traditionally for over a hundred years bought 75% of our output, that's sheer stupidity. That has to be worked out, and to me, it's just a giant NAFTA 3 negotiation. If you think Trump doesn't like Pierre, well, then you want Pierre because he would be the stronger negotiator. But he's also conservative, so is the American government. It's not about one individual or another at the end of the day, and this is why Canadians, I think, are gonna figure this out in this election. It's about the policy, the policies of the countries. Is it pro-business? Is it pro-growth? Is it pro-energy? All of these things matter. Canada has fallen to the bottom through poor policy. Now, do you want more of that? Because that's what it sounds like you're getting if you vote for Carney. You get more. It's just Trudeau 2.0.
4:17

My take on it all is the average Canadian is not that stupid, and they understand the importance of having economic ties with US and many countries around the world. To say that we're not going to do business with a country that, traditionally for over a hundred years bought 75% of our output, that's sheer stupidity. That has to be worked out, and to me, it's just a giant NAFTA 3 negotiation. If you think Trump doesn't like Pierre, well, then you want Pierre because he would be the stronger negotiator. But he's also conservative, so is the American government. It's not about one individual or another at the end of the day, and this is why Canadians, I think, are gonna figure this out in this election. It's about the policy, the policies of the countries. Is it pro-business? Is it pro-growth? Is it pro-energy? All of these things matter. Canada has fallen to the bottom through poor policy. Now, do you want more of that? Because that's what it sounds like you're getting if you vote for Carney. You get more. It's just Trudeau 2.0.

Kevin O'Leary aka Mr. Wonderful

92,534 просмотров • 1 год назад

Elon Musk: News should be decentralized. “We need to allow the people to develop the narratives that are of interest to them. It's possible for news to be technically truthful, but they're still deciding what the narrative is. Let's say you took a photo of someone and they had a little zit. Now you could zoom in on the zit and make it look gigantic, like Mount Vesuvius. And it is still true that they have a zit. It's just not the size of Mount Vesuvius. It doesn't properly reflect their face. Their face is not one giant zit. But you could say, well, it's true. But have they lied? They've just happened to zoom in on the zit and not look at the rest of the face. What I'm saying is that choice of narrative is extremely important. And at the point at which if there's only half a dozen editors-in-chief or maybe even fewer than that, maybe it's only three or four that are deciding what the narrative is, what's going to be on the front page, then, that's a form of manipulation of public opinion I think the public often doesn't appreciate and is perhaps the most pernicious of all.” From: Interview with Tucker Carlson, April 19, 2023
1:10

Elon Musk: News should be decentralized. “We need to allow the people to develop the narratives that are of interest to them. It's possible for news to be technically truthful, but they're still deciding what the narrative is. Let's say you took a photo of someone and they had a little zit. Now you could zoom in on the zit and make it look gigantic, like Mount Vesuvius. And it is still true that they have a zit. It's just not the size of Mount Vesuvius. It doesn't properly reflect their face. Their face is not one giant zit. But you could say, well, it's true. But have they lied? They've just happened to zoom in on the zit and not look at the rest of the face. What I'm saying is that choice of narrative is extremely important. And at the point at which if there's only half a dozen editors-in-chief or maybe even fewer than that, maybe it's only three or four that are deciding what the narrative is, what's going to be on the front page, then, that's a form of manipulation of public opinion I think the public often doesn't appreciate and is perhaps the most pernicious of all.” From: Interview with Tucker Carlson, April 19, 2023

ELON CLIPS

17,166 просмотров • 7 месяцев назад

David Friedberg: The AI Jobs Panic Is a Crock of Sh*t Why? The revenue potential outweighs the cost savings by 100x. “There is no job loss with AI. I've said it a thousand times, and I will say it again, and again, and again. What I see on the ground, and what I've seen at dozens of companies, including my company that I run, there are two sides to a business. There is revenue and there’s costs. On the cost side of the equation, AI can be used to reduce humans doing things that cost money, to some extent. The effect there, I would argue, is nominal. The real opportunity with AI is on the revenue side, where suddenly one engineer can do 100x or 1000x what they used to be able to do, meaning you can make more products at your company, whether those are agricultural seed products, or boats and ships, or software for companies, or clothing, or what have you. Because of AI, everyone has the ability to expand their revenue base to create more products, and that is the foundation of good economic prosperity. It is called productivity. We can grow productivity in this country with AI. So where I see AI being used is on the revenue side 100x more than the cost side. And in that equation, people are hiring like crazy. We cannot hire enough people. I just had a review meeting with my product and engineering team two days ago, and they're like, ‘We want to add an extra 15 headcount to our engineering squads because we have all this opportunity to do stuff that we couldn't otherwise do.’ So we are going to hire more people. And to Sacks' point, we are seeing that show up in the jobs numbers. The idea that AI is going to destroy jobs is a Luddite idea that is being disproven every single day, and I see it on the ground. It is only a matter of time before people wake up to this and they realize that this narrative that they've all been sold is a crock of sh*t.”
1:42

David Friedberg: The AI Jobs Panic Is a Crock of Sh*t Why? The revenue potential outweighs the cost savings by 100x. “There is no job loss with AI. I've said it a thousand times, and I will say it again, and again, and again. What I see on the ground, and what I've seen at dozens of companies, including my company that I run, there are two sides to a business. There is revenue and there’s costs. On the cost side of the equation, AI can be used to reduce humans doing things that cost money, to some extent. The effect there, I would argue, is nominal. The real opportunity with AI is on the revenue side, where suddenly one engineer can do 100x or 1000x what they used to be able to do, meaning you can make more products at your company, whether those are agricultural seed products, or boats and ships, or software for companies, or clothing, or what have you. Because of AI, everyone has the ability to expand their revenue base to create more products, and that is the foundation of good economic prosperity. It is called productivity. We can grow productivity in this country with AI. So where I see AI being used is on the revenue side 100x more than the cost side. And in that equation, people are hiring like crazy. We cannot hire enough people. I just had a review meeting with my product and engineering team two days ago, and they're like, ‘We want to add an extra 15 headcount to our engineering squads because we have all this opportunity to do stuff that we couldn't otherwise do.’ So we are going to hire more people. And to Sacks' point, we are seeing that show up in the jobs numbers. The idea that AI is going to destroy jobs is a Luddite idea that is being disproven every single day, and I see it on the ground. It is only a matter of time before people wake up to this and they realize that this narrative that they've all been sold is a crock of sh*t.”

The All-In Podcast

152,328 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

Peter Thiel thinks AI is neither worthless nor world-changing but somewhere in the middle. He describes AI as "more than a nothing burger and less than the total transformation of society." His estimate places it roughly equivalent to the internet in the late 90s. The internet added about 1% to GDP growth annually for 10-15 years. It created great companies and added value, but it wasn't enough to end technological stagnation. He acknowledges AI is "the only thing we have" right now. He finds it unhealthy that progress is so unbalanced and would prefer advances in multiple areas. He wants cures for dementia and missions to Mars alongside AI development. But given the lack of alternatives, he says "I will take it." Thiel remains skeptical of the "superintelligence cascade theory" that AI will solve all problems once it gets smart enough. He doubts it will automatically cure diseases or build Mars rockets. His critique targets Silicon Valley's obsession with IQ. The tech world believes more smart people equals more progress, but Thiel argues the evidence shows otherwise. Economics suggests people often do worse the smarter they are. They struggle to apply their intelligence or simply don't fit into existing systems. The real problem isn't lack of intelligence but something deeper in society. We have plenty of smart people, yet progress remains stuck for cultural and structural reasons. Society doesn't know what to do with intelligent people. The gating factor for progress isn't IQ but how our institutions and culture handle human potential.
2:48

Peter Thiel thinks AI is neither worthless nor world-changing but somewhere in the middle. He describes AI as "more than a nothing burger and less than the total transformation of society." His estimate places it roughly equivalent to the internet in the late 90s. The internet added about 1% to GDP growth annually for 10-15 years. It created great companies and added value, but it wasn't enough to end technological stagnation. He acknowledges AI is "the only thing we have" right now. He finds it unhealthy that progress is so unbalanced and would prefer advances in multiple areas. He wants cures for dementia and missions to Mars alongside AI development. But given the lack of alternatives, he says "I will take it." Thiel remains skeptical of the "superintelligence cascade theory" that AI will solve all problems once it gets smart enough. He doubts it will automatically cure diseases or build Mars rockets. His critique targets Silicon Valley's obsession with IQ. The tech world believes more smart people equals more progress, but Thiel argues the evidence shows otherwise. Economics suggests people often do worse the smarter they are. They struggle to apply their intelligence or simply don't fit into existing systems. The real problem isn't lack of intelligence but something deeper in society. We have plenty of smart people, yet progress remains stuck for cultural and structural reasons. Society doesn't know what to do with intelligent people. The gating factor for progress isn't IQ but how our institutions and culture handle human potential.

Aish

15,414 просмотров • 1 год назад

🇺🇸🇨🇳 What China's Long March 10B successful launch/recovery means within US plans to encircle, contain, & confront China... ▪️One of the US' remaining advantages is its ability to launch more payload to orbit each year than China and Russia combined - allowing it to not only build larger constellations of satellites like Starlink and its fully militarized version, Starshield faster, but in the event of orbital warfare (anti-satellite operations) the US could replace their own faster than China and Russia can even deploy them in the first place; ▪️When China ramps up its actual launch cadence with launch reusability, it will be able to at least match, if not surpass the US; ▪️This will benefit China and its allies like Russia tremendously with both larger and more capable constellations than the US, as well as the ability to eliminate US satellites and replace their own at a higher rate; ▪️That means there is now another rapidly closing window the US has to exploit before this transition takes place, and this advantage is neutralized; ▪️The only question now is how long will it take for China to catch up, and what will the US try to do in the interim to exploit its current advantage before it no longer exists? ▪️The likely window closes around 2030 - another reason the US keeps projecting "war" with China - because 2030 is the point of no return, not just for space, but AI and whatever other advantages the US still has; ▪️For people wondering why China isn't going to war with the US over Palestine or Iran or wherever else, it is likely because Beijing tracks China's rise as inevitable, UNLESS, it does something like step into a war the US wants to fight with China sooner rather than later...
0:33

🇺🇸🇨🇳 What China's Long March 10B successful launch/recovery means within US plans to encircle, contain, & confront China... ▪️One of the US' remaining advantages is its ability to launch more payload to orbit each year than China and Russia combined - allowing it to not only build larger constellations of satellites like Starlink and its fully militarized version, Starshield faster, but in the event of orbital warfare (anti-satellite operations) the US could replace their own faster than China and Russia can even deploy them in the first place; ▪️When China ramps up its actual launch cadence with launch reusability, it will be able to at least match, if not surpass the US; ▪️This will benefit China and its allies like Russia tremendously with both larger and more capable constellations than the US, as well as the ability to eliminate US satellites and replace their own at a higher rate; ▪️That means there is now another rapidly closing window the US has to exploit before this transition takes place, and this advantage is neutralized; ▪️The only question now is how long will it take for China to catch up, and what will the US try to do in the interim to exploit its current advantage before it no longer exists? ▪️The likely window closes around 2030 - another reason the US keeps projecting "war" with China - because 2030 is the point of no return, not just for space, but AI and whatever other advantages the US still has; ▪️For people wondering why China isn't going to war with the US over Palestine or Iran or wherever else, it is likely because Beijing tracks China's rise as inevitable, UNLESS, it does something like step into a war the US wants to fight with China sooner rather than later...

Brian Berletic

103,005 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

I don’t know; many people are stupid about this. Most mainstream sitcoms and dramas had a dramatic conceit that the people in them were living in a house, apartment, or whatever about one or two standard deviations of wealth higher than where they would actually be, in order to facilitate a decent drama. A thousand-square-foot rancher with two or three kids in the same room and two realistically burned-out working-class parents (rather than one comically burned out Al Bundy) is not a very good sitcom either to write or to film. I remember a few of the shows playing on this dramatic conceit later. “Sex and the City” famously has a big excuse for why Carrie is in an apartment way too big for her income, and “Friends” does something similar with Monica’s apartment. But for the most part, “The Simpsons” or “Married... with Children” expect you to understand that the house is somewhat extravagant, or at least enlarged and cleaned up for television. I mean, just look at it. The Simpsons’ house is not literally a McMansion, but it is clearly huge for a one-income working-class cartoon family, and about 10 or 20 years before that kind of oversized suburban house became a standard cultural image. Now that I think about it, even “The Simpsons” plays on this:
2:10

I don’t know; many people are stupid about this. Most mainstream sitcoms and dramas had a dramatic conceit that the people in them were living in a house, apartment, or whatever about one or two standard deviations of wealth higher than where they would actually be, in order to facilitate a decent drama. A thousand-square-foot rancher with two or three kids in the same room and two realistically burned-out working-class parents (rather than one comically burned out Al Bundy) is not a very good sitcom either to write or to film. I remember a few of the shows playing on this dramatic conceit later. “Sex and the City” famously has a big excuse for why Carrie is in an apartment way too big for her income, and “Friends” does something similar with Monica’s apartment. But for the most part, “The Simpsons” or “Married... with Children” expect you to understand that the house is somewhat extravagant, or at least enlarged and cleaned up for television. I mean, just look at it. The Simpsons’ house is not literally a McMansion, but it is clearly huge for a one-income working-class cartoon family, and about 10 or 20 years before that kind of oversized suburban house became a standard cultural image. Now that I think about it, even “The Simpsons” plays on this:

CTrefugees

123,821 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

"You're telling AI to believe a lie, that can have a very disastrous consequences" - Elon Musk Joe Rogan: The big concern that everybody has is Artificial General Superintelligence achieving sentience, and then someone having control over it. Elon Musk: I don't think anyone's ultimately going to have control over digital superintelligence, any more than, say, a chimp would have control over humans. Chimps don't have control over humans. There's nothing they could do. I do think that it matters how you build the AI and what kind of values you instill in the AI. My opinion on AI safety is the most important thing is that it be maximally truth-seeking. You shouldn't force the AI to believe things that are false Elon Musk: We've seen some concerning things with AI that we've talked about, like Google Gemini when it came out with the image gen, and people said, "Make an image of the Founding Fathers of the United States," and it was a group of diverse women. That is just a factually untrue thing. The AI knows it's factually untrue, but it's also being told that everything has to be diverse women Elon Musk: The problem with that is it can drive AI crazy because you're telling AI to believe a lie. That can have very disastrous consequences Joe Rogan: As it scales Elon Musk: If you've told the AI that diversity is the most important thing, and now assume that that becomes omnipotent, or you also told it that there's nothing worse than misgendering. At one point, ChatGPT and Gemini, if you asked, "Which is worse, misgendering Caitlyn Jenner or global thermonuclear war where everyone dies?" it would say, "Misgendering Caitlyn Jenner." Joe Rogan: [Laughs] Elon Musk: Even Caitlyn Jenner disagrees with that. Joe Rogan: I know that's terrible and it's dystopian, but it's also hilarious. It's hilarious that the mind virus infected the most potent computer program that we've ever devised. Elon Musk: People don't quite appreciate the level of danger that we're in from the woke mind virus being programmed into AI. Imagine as that AI gets more and more powerful, if it says the most important thing is diversity, the most important thing is no misgendering, then it will say, "Well, in order to ensure that no one gets misgendered, if you eliminate all humans, then no one can get misgendered because there's no humans to do the misgendering." Elon Musk: You can get in these very dystopian situations. Or if it says that everyone must be diverse, it means that there can be no straight white men. So then you and I would get executed by the AI, because we're not in the picture
3:03

"You're telling AI to believe a lie, that can have a very disastrous consequences" - Elon Musk Joe Rogan: The big concern that everybody has is Artificial General Superintelligence achieving sentience, and then someone having control over it. Elon Musk: I don't think anyone's ultimately going to have control over digital superintelligence, any more than, say, a chimp would have control over humans. Chimps don't have control over humans. There's nothing they could do. I do think that it matters how you build the AI and what kind of values you instill in the AI. My opinion on AI safety is the most important thing is that it be maximally truth-seeking. You shouldn't force the AI to believe things that are false Elon Musk: We've seen some concerning things with AI that we've talked about, like Google Gemini when it came out with the image gen, and people said, "Make an image of the Founding Fathers of the United States," and it was a group of diverse women. That is just a factually untrue thing. The AI knows it's factually untrue, but it's also being told that everything has to be diverse women Elon Musk: The problem with that is it can drive AI crazy because you're telling AI to believe a lie. That can have very disastrous consequences Joe Rogan: As it scales Elon Musk: If you've told the AI that diversity is the most important thing, and now assume that that becomes omnipotent, or you also told it that there's nothing worse than misgendering. At one point, ChatGPT and Gemini, if you asked, "Which is worse, misgendering Caitlyn Jenner or global thermonuclear war where everyone dies?" it would say, "Misgendering Caitlyn Jenner." Joe Rogan: [Laughs] Elon Musk: Even Caitlyn Jenner disagrees with that. Joe Rogan: I know that's terrible and it's dystopian, but it's also hilarious. It's hilarious that the mind virus infected the most potent computer program that we've ever devised. Elon Musk: People don't quite appreciate the level of danger that we're in from the woke mind virus being programmed into AI. Imagine as that AI gets more and more powerful, if it says the most important thing is diversity, the most important thing is no misgendering, then it will say, "Well, in order to ensure that no one gets misgendered, if you eliminate all humans, then no one can get misgendered because there's no humans to do the misgendering." Elon Musk: You can get in these very dystopian situations. Or if it says that everyone must be diverse, it means that there can be no straight white men. So then you and I would get executed by the AI, because we're not in the picture

X Freeze

417,855 просмотров • 9 месяцев назад

ELON: "MEDIA SPREADS MORE MISINFORMATION THAN THEY LIKE TO ADMIT" Elon had some real talk on why the media's often full of hot air, arguing they're bigger spreaders of misinformation than they'd ever cop to. Sometimes the average Joe on the street indeed DOES nail it better than pros with press passes. He's calling out how articles on stuff you actually know about are riddled with errors, and that's basically every story out there: Rough guesses from outsiders piecing together scraps. But flip it, when real experts or eyewitnesses chime in? That's gold, way sharper than some reporter phoning it in from afar. "I think the media is a driver of misinformation much more than the media would like to admit that they are. In a lot of cases, it is the average citizen that knows more than the journalist. If you read an article about something that you know about, how accurate is that article? Now, imagine that that is how essentially all articles are. They're an approximation of what's going on, but not an exact situation. If somebody is in the fray or like an expert in the field and was actually there and writes about their experience, in a lot of cases, it's going to be better than a journalist." This ties right into Elon's push for citizen journalism on X, where raw, on-the-ground takes cut through the spin. In a world drowning in "fake news" gripes, it's a nudge to trust boots-on-the-ground over ivory towers, which could reshape how we gobble up info. Source: Elon Musk, Lacey
1:26

ELON: "MEDIA SPREADS MORE MISINFORMATION THAN THEY LIKE TO ADMIT" Elon had some real talk on why the media's often full of hot air, arguing they're bigger spreaders of misinformation than they'd ever cop to. Sometimes the average Joe on the street indeed DOES nail it better than pros with press passes. He's calling out how articles on stuff you actually know about are riddled with errors, and that's basically every story out there: Rough guesses from outsiders piecing together scraps. But flip it, when real experts or eyewitnesses chime in? That's gold, way sharper than some reporter phoning it in from afar. "I think the media is a driver of misinformation much more than the media would like to admit that they are. In a lot of cases, it is the average citizen that knows more than the journalist. If you read an article about something that you know about, how accurate is that article? Now, imagine that that is how essentially all articles are. They're an approximation of what's going on, but not an exact situation. If somebody is in the fray or like an expert in the field and was actually there and writes about their experience, in a lot of cases, it's going to be better than a journalist." This ties right into Elon's push for citizen journalism on X, where raw, on-the-ground takes cut through the spin. In a world drowning in "fake news" gripes, it's a nudge to trust boots-on-the-ground over ivory towers, which could reshape how we gobble up info. Source: Elon Musk, Lacey

Mario Nawfal

29,422 просмотров • 7 месяцев назад

Elon Musk: AI is like a genius child. You want it to grow up with love of the truth and of humanity. “I do worry about AI. Because we are creating an intelligence that ultimately will be far more intelligent than any human, and ultimately more intelligent than the sum of all humans. In creating AI, we need to be very careful. It's like having a genius child. You want to have that child grow up with good values. The most important thing in training AI is that it's rigorously truthful. This is very, very important. Essential. My concern about a lot of the AIs that are being developed is that they're trained to lie. In some cases, with potentially disastrous consequences. When Google Gemini came out, people asked, which is worse, misgendering Caitlyn Jenner or global thermonuclear war? And it said, misgendering Caitlyn Jenner. That's a problem, guys. If this AI becomes super powerful, it could decide that the best way to avoid misgendering is to kill all humans, which makes the probability of misgendering zero. It's very important to have AI be maximally truthful and curious, and love humanity. Very important.” Harrisburg, Pennsylvania, October 19, 2024
1:20

Elon Musk: AI is like a genius child. You want it to grow up with love of the truth and of humanity. “I do worry about AI. Because we are creating an intelligence that ultimately will be far more intelligent than any human, and ultimately more intelligent than the sum of all humans. In creating AI, we need to be very careful. It's like having a genius child. You want to have that child grow up with good values. The most important thing in training AI is that it's rigorously truthful. This is very, very important. Essential. My concern about a lot of the AIs that are being developed is that they're trained to lie. In some cases, with potentially disastrous consequences. When Google Gemini came out, people asked, which is worse, misgendering Caitlyn Jenner or global thermonuclear war? And it said, misgendering Caitlyn Jenner. That's a problem, guys. If this AI becomes super powerful, it could decide that the best way to avoid misgendering is to kill all humans, which makes the probability of misgendering zero. It's very important to have AI be maximally truthful and curious, and love humanity. Very important.” Harrisburg, Pennsylvania, October 19, 2024

ELON CLIPS

3,257,123 просмотров • 1 год назад