Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Zur Startseite

25,213 Aufrufe • vor 2 Tagen •via X (Twitter)

5 Kommentare

Profilbild von Georgia Mimi
Georgia Mimivor 2 Tagen

Dust to dust she is

Profilbild von Tim Aspen
Tim Aspenvor 2 Tagen

its funny you haven't mentioned the white person she bought the 1000 acres from... fake outrage is fake. the outrage is how dare this black woman

Profilbild von Big Toker
Big Tokervor 2 Tagen

You forgot the fact that she brought Jamie fox who’s career was stagnant to a producer who likes guys and they have to suck him if they want a chance at a movie

Profilbild von Sylvia Y Rodulfo
Sylvia Y Rodulfovor 2 Tagen

Amen

Profilbild von follow the white🐇
follow the white🐇vor 2 Tagen

Trump?🤦🏾

Ähnliche Videos

The world is run by an oligarchy of elite pedophil*s who claim to be good people helping children and the planet while they do the exact opposite and pollute the skies in their private jets, launder our taxpayer dollars to fund their illegal operations and lavish lifestyles, and sexually abuse and trafficking children. Why do people who tend to blow the whistle on these elite scumbag child abusers always end up dying in mysterious ways? The Epstein case is the most important case in the world, and the people involved must be exposed, arrested, and prosecuted. Some of the wealthiest, most powerful people and "leaders" of our world are involved. Bill Clinton who appeared on the flight logs over 26 times, his wife Hillary Clinton who also visited the island more than 8 times and their "foundation" meant to help children was actually doing the opposite and trafficking children. Prince Andrew, Kevin Spacey, Akon, Chris Tucker, Chrissy Teigen, Tom Hanks, Oprah, Madonna, Naomi Campbell, Tyra Banks, Seth Green, Alan Dershowitz, Barack Obama, Chelsea Handler, James Franco, Jean Luc Brunel, Jimmy Kimmel, John Legend, Kathy Griffin, Katy Perry, Lynn Forester De Rothchild, Pharrel Williams, Quentin Tarantino, Robert Downey Jr., Shawn Carter, Steven Colbert, Steven Tyler, Wanda Sykes, Will Ferrell, Woody Allen, the list goes on and on and on. GPS records confirm more than 200 people from the U.S. alone tied to Epstein's island, also including, billionaire Bill Gates. Bill Gates should be on trial for crimes against humanity for his involvement with vaccines and experiments on people in 3rd world countries alone, but it gets even worse. Bill Gates is verified to be on Epstein's flight logs 6 times or more, including the island, and Epstein's Seattle mansion. Bill Gates also denied having any associations or business dealings with Epstein, but come to find out that an expose by the NY Times exposed that well after Epstein was convicted for sex trafficking, the two were in the process of starting a multibillion-dollar charitable fund. Why would one of the richest men in the world lie about his association and business dealings, and why would he choose to work with the worlds most notorious pedophi*e ever known, even after he knew he was a convicted pedophi*e? Everything and everyone is connected and is why the Epstein case is so important. There are no coincidences. Join the movement and let's take down this child trafficking cabal. It's time... DROP THE LIST.

The SCIF

32,323 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

Here’s my analysis of why MEGHAN MARKLE LIES with such ease and how the Oprah interview exposed it. There are lies that come from panic. There are lies that come from confusion. Then there are lies that come from entitlement. The kind that slip out smoothly, confidently, without a flicker of worry, because the person saying them believes consequences are for other people. That is exactly what Meghan Markle displayed in the Oprah interview when she claimed she and Harry were married “three days before” their wedding, with the Archbishop of Canterbury. She didn’t frame it as a private vow or a romantic moment. She framed it as an actual marriage. And she did it on global television with a smile, like she was sharing a charming secret. But it wasn’t charming. It wasn’t harmless. And it certainly wasn’t true. It was a lie told with ease because she expected everyone else to absorb it without questioning it. The Lie Was Designed to Sound Like a Fairytale, Not a Fact This is how Meghan operates. She doesn’t just lie, she packages the lie. She wraps it in sentiment and sweetness so the audience reacts emotionally instead of logically. She didn’t say “We exchanged vows privately.” That would be plausible, normal, and not legally loaded. She said “We got married.” That choice of words matters. It changes everything. It turns a private moment into a legal and religious claim. It drags an institution into her story. And it creates pressure on other people to defend themselves. That is the real point. Meghan’s lies are never just personal. They are strategic. This Was Not a “Little Mistake” Because It Had Real Consequences Anyone trying to defend her will call it a misunderstanding. But a misunderstanding does not involve naming the Archbishop of Canterbury and implying a secret marriage happened before a globally televised wedding. Her statement instantly created two outcomes. 1) It cornered the Archbishop into cleaning up her mess By claiming he “married” them days earlier, Meghan effectively placed him in a position where silence would look like confirmation and denial would look like embarrassment. So he had to respond. That is the cruelty in it. It’s not just that she lied. It’s that she lied in a way that forced a senior religious figure to publicly correct her. She put a man of office into the role of damage control, because she wanted a romantic headline. That is not a “slip.” That is reckless and selfish. 2) It undermined the legitimacy of the official wedding Their actual wedding was not private. It was not hidden. It was a historical public event. So why tell the world the “real” marriage happened earlier? Because it reframes the real wedding into something performative, staged, and secondary. It whispers to the audience: That wasn’t for us, that was for them. It’s the same pattern every time. If the institution celebrates her, she uses it. If the institution limits her, she devalues it. Why She Lies With Ease: Because Her Lies Are Tools, Not Errors Meghan does not lie like someone afraid of being caught. She lies like someone who believes truth is flexible.

Queen Esther

110,252 Aufrufe • vor 8 Monaten

PLEASE WATCH THIS CLIP FOR INSIGHT ON THE ROYAL FAMILY’S SOPHISTICATED DISCREET INSTITUTIONAL ABUSE & UNFAIRNESS!!!! I also encourage you to rewatch the whole Oprah interview with Prince Harry and Meghan. There’s so much that is forgotten and so much that makes so much more sense now. ♦️Although this section of the interview exposed and therefore probably scuppered the Royal Family’s plan to change the convention so as to not have the Sussex’s children be titled Prince/Princesses when Charles their grandfather ascended to the throne after all, Meghan gives a vivid picture of what she and Harry faced behind palace doors that royal reporters have tried to distract us from by pretending they lied or focusing on the racism stuff. ♦️It shows how the Royal Family uses character assassination campaigns by their media pals, threats to deny titles and therefore security in order to dehumanise the un-favoured members of the family behind the scenes whilst still using them to promote the monarchy. ♦️Of course Harry and Meghan would not want to hard launch Archie’s life as if he would be a public high profile royal by parading him to the public at birth outside the hospital if behind the scenes the discussion by the family was to delegitimise him, ensure he gets no security and possibly subject him to the character assassination H&M realised the Royal family were allowing to happen against them, meaning that if this happened to Archie he would be more vulnerable without security. They let Meghan (and Harry)be criticised to high heaven for treating & protecting Archie from a public glare that should not come without security and was reasonable if he was not to be a titled royal. ♦️It’s also highly manipulative that in laying the groundwork, royal reporters told us that Harry and Meghan did not want their children to be titled, and they silenced them from correcting that so that if they did indeed change the convention and Archie was not titled, the public would be led to believe it was H&M that wanted this and not the royal family/the firm. The institution would feign innocence. ♦️It’s only since leaving that Harry and Meghan have been able to say their truth against strong calls from royal family proxies for them to be ‘private’ =be silent =hide the institutional abuse which would eventually be directed at Archie and Lilibet.

Glow Lee

10,976 Aufrufe • vor 8 Monaten