正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

加载此视频时出现问题。这可能是由于临时网络问题，或视频可能不可用。

Opus 5 appears to be a top performing model at agentic CAD design! It even outperforms Fable on a number on a number of mechanical design tasks

adam

15,511 subscribers

107,057 次观看 • 1 个月前 •via X (Twitter)

科学技术教育

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 条评论

暂无评论

原始帖子的评论将显示在这里

相关视频

I had access to Opus 5 before release and found it to be a good model if a quirky one. On shorter tasks, it could match or beat Fable levels of performance, at longer tasks it seemed less ambitious & would not deliver as complete a set of work. Here is its neo-gothic shader.

I had access to Opus 5 before release and found it to be a good model if a quirky one. On shorter tasks, it could match or beat Fable levels of performance, at longer tasks it seemed less ambitious & would not deliver as complete a set of work. Here is its neo-gothic shader.

Ethan Mollick

101,569 次观看 • 1 个月前

Claude Fable 5 and Opus 5 are #1 when it comes to UI. GPT 5.6 Sol and Grok 4.6 don't come anywhere close to the design capabilities that Claude models have. Even though Fable 5 and Opus 5 are slow and expensive I keep finding myself reaching for them for design. This hero section was made with Fable 5 and Opus 5.

Claude Fable 5 and Opus 5 are #1 when it comes to UI. GPT 5.6 Sol and Grok 4.6 don't come anywhere close to the design capabilities that Claude models have. Even though Fable 5 and Opus 5 are slow and expensive I keep finding myself reaching for them for design. This hero section was made with Fable 5 and Opus 5.

BridgeMind

58,743 次观看 • 22 天前

Both Claude Opus 5 and GPT-5.6 Sol have been performing exceptionally well on our leaderboards, ranking in the top 3 across almost all of our non-agentic tasks. We put both models through the same 3D design and website challenges to see where each excels the most. Watch the full breakdown on Youtube:

Both Claude Opus 5 and GPT-5.6 Sol have been performing exceptionally well on our leaderboards, ranking in the top 3 across almost all of our non-agentic tasks. We put both models through the same 3D design and website challenges to see where each excels the most. Watch the full breakdown on Youtube:

Design Arena

30,773 次观看 • 1 个月前

Most benchmarks just give you a number on a chart. We made one where you judge the actual work side-by-side. Here's Fable 5 vs GPT-5.6 Sol on a mix of design, writing, and creative work. Try Hyperbench and choose your winner:

Most benchmarks just give you a number on a chart. We made one where you judge the actual work side-by-side. Here's Fable 5 vs GPT-5.6 Sol on a mix of design, writing, and creative work. Try Hyperbench and choose your winner:

Hyperagent

124,967 次观看 • 1 个月前

Fable 5, first Mythos-class model is live on AI/ML API! We ran a fun test: Opus 4.8 vs Fable 5 are generating a 3D Pokemon. Verdict? Fable 5 is brilliant, fast, and rare as Mew… but Opus is still that nice little guy who does great stuff. 💛 Fable 5 Important bits: SOTA on nearly every benchmark, and the lead only grows on longer, complex tasks. • 1M Context • $10 / 1M input • $50 / 1M output Built for: long-horizon agentic coding, big migrations, vision-to-code, deep research.

Fable 5, first Mythos-class model is live on AI/ML API! We ran a fun test: Opus 4.8 vs Fable 5 are generating a 3D Pokemon. Verdict? Fable 5 is brilliant, fast, and rare as Mew… but Opus is still that nice little guy who does great stuff. 💛 Fable 5 Important bits: SOTA on nearly every benchmark, and the lead only grows on longer, complex tasks. • 1M Context • $10 / 1M input • $50 / 1M output Built for: long-horizon agentic coding, big migrations, vision-to-code, deep research.

AI/ML API

560,710 次观看 • 3 个月前

Same game. Three models. UX test, not just UI. DeepSeek: $0.0008. GLM 5.2: $0.048. Fable 5: $0.42. Open source won on both design and price. Fable 5 just lost a UX battle to a model 500x cheaper.

Same game. Three models. UX test, not just UI. DeepSeek: $0.0008. GLM 5.2: $0.048. Fable 5: $0.42. Open source won on both design and price. Fable 5 just lost a UX battle to a model 500x cheaper.

0xMarioNawfal

75,760 次观看 • 1 个月前

Fable 5 designed a completely functional mechanical watch in CAD Inspired by the Omega Speedmaster Professional, the "Moonwatch" that NASA astronauts wore on the Apollo missions Claude is still the king of CAD

Fable 5 designed a completely functional mechanical watch in CAD Inspired by the Omega Speedmaster Professional, the "Moonwatch" that NASA astronauts wore on the Apollo missions Claude is still the king of CAD

Jake Fitzgerald

28,119 次观看 • 1 个月前

asked claude fable 5 to design spacex starship with mechazilla it modelled the first stage boosters and even animated a chopstick catch at the end absolutely insane

asked claude fable 5 to design spacex starship with mechazilla it modelled the first stage boosters and even animated a chopstick catch at the end absolutely insane

Jake Fitzgerald

51,787 次观看 • 2 个月前

Claude Fable 5 + Claude Design is f*cking insane 🤯 Anthropic just dropped its most intelligent model ever, and the first thing I pointed it at was email design. I built a complete email campaign design in Claude Design, and the difference is night and day: tighter layouts, cleaner hierarchy, on-brand from the first generation. All inside Claude Design with Fable 5. Perfect for DTC brands and agencies who are still paying email agencies $3-5K/month for campaign designs that take 2 weeks to ship. If your campaign calendar is packed but every new email means briefing a designer, waiting on mockups, sending notes, and waiting again... This workflow eliminates the entire bottleneck: → Load your brand design system into Claude Design once (colors, fonts, logo, button styling) → Switch the model to Claude Fable 5 — Anthropic's new state-of-the-art model with the best vision of any AI → Prompt the campaign email section by section: header, hero, headline, offer block, CTA → Fable 5 nails layout and brand details that older models fumbled → Iterate inline — swap images, adjust styling, color-pick directly in the canvas → Export the finished email and hand off to your ESP No briefing a designer. No 2-week turnaround on a single campaign. No paying an agency $4K/month for 4 emails. What you get: → Campaign emails designed in minutes, not weeks → A reusable design system every new email pulls from automatically → Noticeably smarter design decisions from Fable 5's upgraded vision → Full inline editing before anything touches your ESP Built 100% with Claude Design + Claude Fable 5. I recorded a full walkthrough showing exactly how this works. Want it for free? > Like this post > Comment "FABLE" And I'll send it over (must be following so I can DM)

Mike Futia

43,189 次观看 • 3 个月前

HERMES AGENT NOW RUNS CLAUDE OPUS 5. NEAR FABLE 5 INTELLIGENCE. HALF THE PRICE. SELF-VERIFIES ITS OWN WORK. AVAILABLE TODAY VIA NOUS PORTAL (20% OFF ALL MODELS). Anthropic shipped Opus 5 on July 24, 2026. same $5/$25 per million tokens as Opus 4.8. but the benchmarks tell a different story. WHAT CHANGED FROM OPUS 4.8: FrontierBench v0.1: Opus 5: 43.3%. Opus 4.8: 18.7%. 2.3x jump on the same test. ARC-AGI-3: Opus 5: 30.2%. 3x better than the next closest model. beat Fable 5 on 8 out of 13 benchmarks. at half the cost ($5/$25 vs $10/$50). same price as Opus 4.8. twice the intelligence. no reason to stay on 4.8. THE SPECS: model ID: claude-opus-5 context: 1M tokens (default and maximum) max output: 128K tokens thinking: on by default effort toggle: low / medium / high per request fast mode: $10/$50, 2.5x faster knowledge cutoff: May 2026 minimum cacheable prompt: 512 tokens (was 1,024) SELF-VERIFICATION (the biggest change): Opus 5 checks its own work automatically. Anthropic says: delete your verification prompts. "include a final verification step" now causes OVER-verification because the model already does it. for Hermes /goal tasks this is a direct upgrade. the judge checks evidence. the model also checks evidence. double layer of verification without extra tokens. EFFORT TOGGLE: low: fast, cheap, routine work. medium: balanced, daily tasks. high: full reasoning, complex problems. set per request. not a global switch. matches Hermes /reasoning command: /reasoning low (routine) /reasoning high (complex) Opus 5 effort toggle + Hermes reasoning control = precise cost management per turn. WHERE OPUS 5 FITS IN HERMES: DAILY DRIVER (replaces Opus 4.8): same price. 2.3x better benchmarks. set as your main model: Desktop app / Dashboard: Models → claude-opus-5 CHIEF OF STAFF: synthesis across multiple agents. reads Kanban, prioritizes, routes tasks. self-verification catches routing errors before they cascade. COMPLEX CODING: SOTA on agentic coding benchmarks. FrontierBench 43.3% = best public model for coding. set as coder profile model. /GOAL TASKS: self-verification + completion contracts = the model proves its work AND double-checks the proof. long-horizon goals finish correctly more often. MoA AGGREGATOR: strongest synthesis model at $5/$25. pair with GPT-5.6 and Grok 4.5 as references. Opus 5 aggregates. best quality at mid-range price. presets: max-quality: reference_models: - provider: openai-codex model: gpt-5.6-sol - provider: xai model: grok-4.5 aggregator: provider: anthropic model: claude-opus-5 COMPUTER USE: near-Fable 5 quality for browser automation. at half the token cost per session. computer_use tasks burn lots of vision tokens. Opus 5 halves that bill vs Fable 5. WHAT TO KEEP OPUS 5 AWAY FROM: cron monitoring: too expensive. use DeepSeek or no_agent mode. sub-agent grunt work: use GPT-5.6 Luna ($1/$6) or DeepSeek. auxiliary tasks: use Gemini Flash. routine web extraction: use a cheap model. Opus 5 is for the turns where quality compounds. planning, synthesis, verification, complex reasoning. budget models handle everything else. NOUS PORTAL: 20% OFF ALL MODELS Nous Portal currently runs a 20% discount on all models including Opus 5. $5/$25 official → $4/$20 through Nous Portal. the cheapest way to run Opus 5 right now. hermes setup --portal select claude-opus-5 as your model. discount applies automatically. Opus 5 replaces Opus 4.8 everywhere. same price. better at everything. no tradeoff. straight upgrade. hermes update /model claude-opus-5

YanXbt

16,744 次观看 • 1 个月前

A quick cost per task comparison of Kimi K3 Kimi.ai and GPT-5.6 Sol by OpenAI. At 3.2x cheaper, Kimi K3's model outputs web apps not just on par for design quality, but better across certain domains. Kimi K3 establishes a new design SOTA and Pareto frontier for cost for design tasks.

A quick cost per task comparison of Kimi K3 Kimi.ai and GPT-5.6 Sol by OpenAI. At 3.2x cheaper, Kimi K3's model outputs web apps not just on par for design quality, but better across certain domains. Kimi K3 establishes a new design SOTA and Pareto frontier for cost for design tasks.

Design Arena

22,584 次观看 • 1 个月前

Noyron allows us to design complex machinery and iterate at unprecedented speeds. Experimentation is the mother of innovation. CAD-based workflows penalize iteration, whereas computational models allow us to be even playful with the design of complex objects.

Noyron allows us to design complex machinery and iterate at unprecedented speeds. Experimentation is the mother of innovation. CAD-based workflows penalize iteration, whereas computational models allow us to be even playful with the design of complex objects.

LEAP 71

15,283 次观看 • 1 个月前

Claude Fable 5 on left vs GPT 5.5 on right. Both one shot. Fable 5 is truly a big jump in CAD capabilities as seen in ForgeCAD.

Claude Fable 5 on left vs GPT 5.5 on right. Both one shot. Fable 5 is truly a big jump in CAD capabilities as seen in ForgeCAD.

Ruben Kostandyan

31,787 次观看 • 3 个月前

MiniMax M3: Opus-level coding at DeepSeek pricing. On Terminal-Bench 2.1, it scores 66.0, only 0.1 behind Opus 4.7. I gave it a quick try on a few frontend tasks, and the output quality genuinely feels close to Opus 4.7.

MiniMax M3: Opus-level coding at DeepSeek pricing. On Terminal-Bench 2.1, it scores 66.0, only 0.1 behind Opus 4.7. I gave it a quick try on a few frontend tasks, and the output quality genuinely feels close to Opus 4.7.

Kai

25,730 次观看 • 3 个月前

Fable 5 vs Sonnet 5 vs Opus 4.8 on the same product ad. All three ran an agentic pipeline through eComrads MCP on Claude: read the product, write the creative direction, render the finished ad. Same brief, but each model directed it completely differently.

Fable 5 vs Sonnet 5 vs Opus 4.8 on the same product ad. All three ran an agentic pipeline through eComrads MCP on Claude: read the product, write the creative direction, render the finished ad. Same brief, but each model directed it completely differently.

eComrads

296,527 次观看 • 2 个月前

The gap between “here’s the design” and “here’s the working app” is getting very small. Grok 4.6 took #1 on the VISTA leaderboard, beating Claude Fable 5, Opus 5, and GPT-5.6 Sol. It has to look at a real Figma design, figure out the structure, recreate the visuals, and build the functioning app from it. And it finished the benchmark at roughly $2.38 per task. That’s the kind of shortcut builders actually care about. Grok SpaceXAI / Writer: Annette, Grok Imagine Designer: Janné

The gap between “here’s the design” and “here’s the working app” is getting very small. Grok 4.6 took #1 on the VISTA leaderboard, beating Claude Fable 5, Opus 5, and GPT-5.6 Sol. It has to look at a real Figma design, figure out the structure, recreate the visuals, and build the functioning app from it. And it finished the benchmark at roughly $2.38 per task. That’s the kind of shortcut builders actually care about. Grok SpaceXAI / Writer: Annette, Grok Imagine Designer: Janné

Mario Nawfal

60,520 次观看 • 24 天前

asked claude fable 5 to design a 16dof articulated robot hand it also wrote a robot description file (urdf) for the hand ~ 1 hour / 300k tokens

asked claude fable 5 to design a 16dof articulated robot hand it also wrote a robot description file (urdf) for the hand ~ 1 hour / 300k tokens

Jake Fitzgerald

318,690 次观看 • 3 个月前

Kimi K3 is a wildly creative model. I asked it to design Dieter Rams' Braun T3 radio in adam. It wrote the CAD, then decided the STEP wasn't enough, piped it into Blender on my Mac and lit a full product shoot in three colorways.

Kimi K3 is a wildly creative model. I asked it to design Dieter Rams' Braun T3 radio in adam. It wrote the CAD, then decided the STEP wasn't enough, piped it into Blender on my Mac and lit a full product shoot in three colorways.

Zach Dive

24,322 次观看 • 1 个月前

asked claude fable 5 to design a qdd actuator it also animated the gearbox and inspected collisions as part of the validation loop ~ 30 minutes / 400k tokens

asked claude fable 5 to design a qdd actuator it also animated the gearbox and inspected collisions as part of the validation loop ~ 30 minutes / 400k tokens

Jake Fitzgerald

326,460 次观看 • 3 个月前