Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Beim Laden dieses Videos ist ein Problem aufgetreten. Dies könnte an einem vorübergehenden Netzwerkproblem liegen oder das Video ist möglicherweise nicht verfügbar.

Opus 5.5 is the best model I've used for game dev. It built me a city where every building breaks, and a full game around it: seven stages, missions in each one, a pet app that calls when your kaiju is hungry. I played it start to finish and... show more

Stefan 3D AI

13,258 subscribers

10,726 Aufrufe • vor 3 Tagen •via X (Twitter)

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

13 Kommentare

Profilbild von Stefan 3D AI

Stefan 3D AIvor 3 Tagen

Most of the city came out of the Higgsfield MCP: 6,525 credits, about $215 on the Ultra plan. • 294 3D models (props, cars, landmarks, facade details): $172 • 367 images and concepts: $34 • 414 voice lines: $6 • 38 video loops for the billboards: $4 The biggest share went to the beach and the piers (1,639 credits), then street props, cars, facade details and the two markets.

Profilbild von Efe

Efevor 3 Tagen

Mine wasn't bug-free: I asked Opus 5.5 for a walkable mountain lake in Godot, and the underwater view came out noisy and the animals' behaviour labels overlap. It still looked clearly better than GPT-6.1 Sol's version of the same task.

Profilbild von Marcus Gravy

Marcus Gravyvor 3 Tagen

Looks good enough to sell to Tencent for 7 figures

Profilbild von Yendrek

Yendrekvor 3 Tagen

whats your experience in using different reasoning levels of opus 5.5?

Profilbild von Fabien Snauwaert

Fabien Snauwaertvor 2 Tagen

ofc you didn't hit a bug: godzilla squashed all of them too! :D which effort level?

Profilbild von Graalito

Graalitovor 3 Tagen

Unity ?

Profilbild von CheeseHound

CheeseHoundvor 3 Tagen

How does higsfield help here, gwnuinely curious, does it make the models and rig them as well, just like what tripo 3D does?

Profilbild von Fahimctg

Fahimctgvor 2 Tagen

That’s seriously impressive

Profilbild von Alexandr Merk

Alexandr Merkvor 3 Tagen

Відпад

Profilbild von werqrwqer

werqrwqervor 3 Tagen

wow this looks shit

Profilbild von ᴵᴬᴹ ➳𝐈ᥣĸᵉ𝑟➳

ᴵᴬᴹ ➳𝐈ᥣĸᵉ𝑟➳vor 3 Tagen

Link?

Profilbild von Sath clark

Sath clarkvor 3 Tagen

now invest in a robust combat system.

Profilbild von Nehezbegar

Nehezbegarvor 2 Tagen

You are so weak, you can only imitate and not only that. LLM does it, You are nothing without it.

Ähnliche Videos

Claude Fable 5 makes new things possible. I one shot a full horror game with it. One prompt. I have never seen AI output a game like this. This is the leap I've been waiting for. 80.3 on SWE-Bench Pro vs Opus 4.8 at 69.2, the biggest jump I have ever seen on that benchmark. It passed GPT 5.5 in both coding and intelligence on Artificial Analysis. I already canceled my $200 ChatGPT Pro plan. It fixed a Bridge Voice bug in one shot that GPT 5.5, Opus 4.7, and Opus 4.8 all failed to crack for 2 months. 10/10. Best model I have ever used. Full review below.

Claude Fable 5 makes new things possible. I one shot a full horror game with it. One prompt. I have never seen AI output a game like this. This is the leap I've been waiting for. 80.3 on SWE-Bench Pro vs Opus 4.8 at 69.2, the biggest jump I have ever seen on that benchmark. It passed GPT 5.5 in both coding and intelligence on Artificial Analysis. I already canceled my $200 ChatGPT Pro plan. It fixed a Bridge Voice bug in one shot that GPT 5.5, Opus 4.7, and Opus 4.8 all failed to crack for 2 months. 10/10. Best model I have ever used. Full review below.

BridgeMind

19,020 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

Opus 5.5 spent 47 hours and $2,550 building a game so I can DESTROY it! I wanted to push Claude to the limit (including weekly usage limit🤣). Most AI games are pretty pictures; I want some real action🔥 So it built Kaiju Tamagotchi: hatch as a tiny lizard, then eat and smash your way through New York until you're a 100 m titan. Every building breaks. I expected way less. It took 47 hours, used fewer tokens than my last game (5B against almost 8B), and the pipelines were smarter this time.

Opus 5.5 spent 47 hours and $2,550 building a game so I can DESTROY it! I wanted to push Claude to the limit (including weekly usage limit🤣). Most AI games are pretty pictures; I want some real action🔥 So it built Kaiju Tamagotchi: hatch as a tiny lizard, then eat and smash your way through New York until you're a 100 m titan. Every building breaks. I expected way less. It took 47 hours, used fewer tokens than my last game (5B against almost 8B), and the pipelines were smarter this time.

Stefan 3D AI

23,156 Aufrufe • vor 4 Tagen

Claude Opus 5.5 just one shot a full multiplayer battle royale like Call of Duty Warzone. Then I used Claude Opus 5.5 with Ultracode to polish it. Parachute drops, a storm that closes over 8 circles, a full map with named towns, and real players dropping in from around the world. Opus 5.5 is unstoppable.

Claude Opus 5.5 just one shot a full multiplayer battle royale like Call of Duty Warzone. Then I used Claude Opus 5.5 with Ultracode to polish it. Parachute drops, a storm that closes over 8 circles, a full map with named towns, and real players dropping in from around the world. Opus 5.5 is unstoppable.

BridgeMind

107,011 Aufrufe • vor 3 Tagen

I made this in Claude Opus 5.5 Roblox Studio UI Builder Plugin v1.2 You can now make UI for any game within like 5 seconds and get full UI for a roblox game with 1 prompt with the tool I've built. I am still going to be constantly improving it until everyone is fully satifisfied for the product, I don't want to release it to the public until it is fully insane, Same with the other tools I've been building for the community and things I think are cool to share with you all.

I made this in Claude Opus 5.5 Roblox Studio UI Builder Plugin v1.2 You can now make UI for any game within like 5 seconds and get full UI for a roblox game with 1 prompt with the tool I've built. I am still going to be constantly improving it until everyone is fully satifisfied for the product, I don't want to release it to the public until it is fully insane, Same with the other tools I've been building for the community and things I think are cool to share with you all.

Code Coach

38,463 Aufrufe • vor 11 Tagen

$63M in 2004. One weekly Claude limit in 2026. In 36 hours Opus 5.5 built a WoW-style game: 6 races, character creation, combat, a zone and a stone city. At pay-per-use prices that's about $2,400 (breakdown below). The original WoW took $63M to develop. A game millions of people love still takes talent. But the build itself is becoming the cheap part. What's left is an idea people fall in love with, and knowing how to show it. And almost anyone who ever dreamed of making their own game is about to get a shot at it.

$63M in 2004. One weekly Claude limit in 2026. In 36 hours Opus 5.5 built a WoW-style game: 6 races, character creation, combat, a zone and a stone city. At pay-per-use prices that's about $2,400 (breakdown below). The original WoW took $63M to develop. A game millions of people love still takes talent. But the build itself is becoming the cheap part. What's left is an idea people fall in love with, and knowing how to show it. And almost anyone who ever dreamed of making their own game is about to get a shot at it.

Stefan 3D AI

181,397 Aufrufe • vor 8 Tagen

I have an addiction to one-shotting calorie trackers so you know I had to try it on Opus 5.5, and WTF this model is CRAZY One massive prompt plus a tiny followup. Full app, music, voice, editing, all of it. 10% quota on the Max plan. Prompts and full breakdown below.

I have an addiction to one-shotting calorie trackers so you know I had to try it on Opus 5.5, and WTF this model is CRAZY One massive prompt plus a tiny followup. Full app, music, voice, editing, all of it. 10% quota on the Max plan. Prompts and full breakdown below.

Anshu

33,334 Aufrufe • vor 8 Tagen

Last week I got Opus 5.5 and GPT-6 Astra to separately build me a 3D game engine in C++ from ONE prompt - a short markdown doc with some basic requirements. Opus 5.5 worked for 36 HOURS STRAIGHT and produced not just a fully functional 3D game engine, but TWO great quality games to go along with it. Astra worked for 1.5 hours and produced a basic starting point. Not sure why it stopped, but the basic engine was there. No idea what the code looks like (yet) - keen to do a code review and find out. This is one of the games that Opus 5.5 built in the "Basalt" engine, as it called it. This is my reaction to seeing it for the first time.

Last week I got Opus 5.5 and GPT-6 Astra to separately build me a 3D game engine in C++ from ONE prompt - a short markdown doc with some basic requirements. Opus 5.5 worked for 36 HOURS STRAIGHT and produced not just a fully functional 3D game engine, but TWO great quality games to go along with it. Astra worked for 1.5 hours and produced a basic starting point. Not sure why it stopped, but the basic engine was there. No idea what the code looks like (yet) - keen to do a code review and find out. This is one of the games that Opus 5.5 built in the "Basalt" engine, as it called it. This is my reaction to seeing it for the first time.

Yan Chernikov

39,125 Aufrufe • vor 17 Stunden

Opus 5.5 made this aesthetic snake game in one shot. The quality is incredible. Probably the best model at 3D and design so far. I cannot wait to see how people use it in game dev.

Opus 5.5 made this aesthetic snake game in one shot. The quality is incredible. Probably the best model at 3D and design so far. I cannot wait to see how people use it in game dev.

Shikhar

12,843 Aufrufe • vor 13 Tagen

this is certified f*cking gold for anyone paying for Claude Sonnet 5.5 costs half of what Opus 5.5 does on real office work across 44 jobs it scores 1844. Opus scores 1846 on coding it went from 10.3% to 70.6% in one version and passed Opus on the way most of what you pay Opus for, Sonnet 5.5 now does at half the price here's how to split the work: • give it to Sonnet 5.5 > bug fixes and well-scoped coding tasks > decks built from your own slide template > spreadsheets and polished documents > UI polish, it has a real eye for design > fast back-and-forth, it runs 30%+ faster • keep it for Opus 5.5 > long, open-ended work with judgment calls for hours > anything where one wrong assumption costs you a day • the setting that saves the most > Medium is the default in the Claude apps and Claude Code > on Low or Medium it beats Sonnet 5's best score for a tenth of the cost > raise effort only when the first answer falls short • the price > $2 in and $10 out, against $4 and $20 for Opus > cache reads $0.20 on both • check before you switch > if you ran Sonnet with thinking off, move to the new between_tools setting first whoever routes the weekly grunt work to Sonnet 5.5 and saves Opus for the hard calls ships more on half the budget, and that's the person who gets noticed

this is certified f*cking gold for anyone paying for Claude Sonnet 5.5 costs half of what Opus 5.5 does on real office work across 44 jobs it scores 1844. Opus scores 1846 on coding it went from 10.3% to 70.6% in one version and passed Opus on the way most of what you pay Opus for, Sonnet 5.5 now does at half the price here's how to split the work: • give it to Sonnet 5.5 > bug fixes and well-scoped coding tasks > decks built from your own slide template > spreadsheets and polished documents > UI polish, it has a real eye for design > fast back-and-forth, it runs 30%+ faster • keep it for Opus 5.5 > long, open-ended work with judgment calls for hours > anything where one wrong assumption costs you a day • the setting that saves the most > Medium is the default in the Claude apps and Claude Code > on Low or Medium it beats Sonnet 5's best score for a tenth of the cost > raise effort only when the first answer falls short • the price > $2 in and $10 out, against $4 and $20 for Opus > cache reads $0.20 on both • check before you switch > if you ran Sonnet with thinking off, move to the new between_tools setting first whoever routes the weekly grunt work to Sonnet 5.5 and saves Opus for the hard calls ships more on half the budget, and that's the person who gets noticed

Annatar.md

19,513 Aufrufe • vor 7 Tagen

I turned this into a full game with unity cli + opus 5.5, also opus did this full demo video, it played the game with multiple characters and spliced together the best bits, holy shit we're in the AGI era. Play it on your browser here:

I turned this into a full game with unity cli + opus 5.5, also opus did this full demo video, it played the game with multiple characters and spliced together the best bits, holy shit we're in the AGI era. Play it on your browser here:

Rehan Sheikh

31,786 Aufrufe • vor 9 Tagen

Claude Opus 5.5 built a full open world game that runs in your browser zero assets. terrain, creatures, boss fight, animations, sound, music. all code it even cut this trailer and made the soundtrack (cover is image generated) play it:

Claude Opus 5.5 built a full open world game that runs in your browser zero assets. terrain, creatures, boss fight, animations, sound, music. all code it even cut this trailer and made the soundtrack (cover is image generated) play it:

Leon Lin

52,087 Aufrufe • vor 12 Tagen

Claude Sonnet 5.5 is out! We wrote a guide for building with it: • choosing between Sonnet 5.5 and Opus 5.5 • migrating from Sonnet 5 and tuning effort • using it in Claude Code

Claude Sonnet 5.5 is out! We wrote a guide for building with it: • choosing between Sonnet 5.5 and Opus 5.5 • migrating from Sonnet 5 and tuning effort • using it in Claude Code

ClaudeDevs

1,267,811 Aufrufe • vor 7 Tagen

I tested MiniMax M3 so you do not have to. It is free in OpenCode right now and it claims to beat GPT 5.5 on SWE-bench. So I put it on real production code. It broke my push-to-talk. It glitched a game through the floor. It took two tries to render a video and still looked rough. The benchmark said one thing. The real work said another. The one thing it has going for it is price. I ran all of BridgeBench for $4.09. If budget is your only constraint, it is the cheapest Chinese model out there. But cheap is not free when it breaks your codebase. No BridgeMind stamp of approval. Full breakdown in the video.

I tested MiniMax M3 so you do not have to. It is free in OpenCode right now and it claims to beat GPT 5.5 on SWE-bench. So I put it on real production code. It broke my push-to-talk. It glitched a game through the floor. It took two tries to render a video and still looked rough. The benchmark said one thing. The real work said another. The one thing it has going for it is price. I ran all of BridgeBench for $4.09. If budget is your only constraint, it is the cheapest Chinese model out there. But cheap is not free when it breaks your codebase. No BridgeMind stamp of approval. Full breakdown in the video.

BridgeMind

46,557 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten

The upcoming new Opus model is exceptional at 3D tasks, particularly in environments like Roblox Studio. It outperforms both Fable 5.1 and 6 Astra at a lower cost, and is faster. Here's an example that blew me away. The game is fully explorable, and Opus added this tour. It didn't even finish as I had to cut it off (it had been switched back to old Opus and I didn't want any work ruined).

The upcoming new Opus model is exceptional at 3D tasks, particularly in environments like Roblox Studio. It outperforms both Fable 5.1 and 6 Astra at a lower cost, and is faster. Here's an example that blew me away. The game is fully explorable, and Opus added this tour. It didn't even finish as I had to cut it off (it had been switched back to old Opus and I didn't want any work ruined).

leo 🐾

106,581 Aufrufe • vor 17 Tagen

A full Solana app, built and shipped in under 10 minutes. All it takes is one idea and one prompt. This is what building with NoahAI looks like.

A full Solana app, built and shipped in under 10 minutes. All it takes is one idea and one prompt. This is what building with NoahAI looks like.

NoahAI

13,146 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

GPT 5.5 just buried opus 4.7 I had it build a pokemon style battle app. 1 prompt. the opus game crashes 90% of the time and Ui is absolute garbage. GPT 5.5 one shotted a masterpiece. Time to cancel anthropic sub?

GPT 5.5 just buried opus 4.7 I had it build a pokemon style battle app. 1 prompt. the opus game crashes 90% of the time and Ui is absolute garbage. GPT 5.5 one shotted a masterpiece. Time to cancel anthropic sub?

Max Blade

460,454 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten

We spent 5.5 million tokens having Claude Opus 5.5 analyze an exoskeleton, find its weak points and redesign it. 39 minutes. One shot. A FULL 3D model, down to the joints. Built in Blender with Higgsfield.

We spent 5.5 million tokens having Claude Opus 5.5 analyze an exoskeleton, find its weak points and redesign it. 39 minutes. One shot. A FULL 3D model, down to the joints. Built in Blender with Higgsfield.

Higgsfield AI 🧩

53,045 Aufrufe • vor 13 Tagen

🚨 codex users!! I tested GPT-6.1 Sol at max and.... it is BAD I gave it a prompt to create a motion graphics video it used: - 2% weekly limit (15% 5 hr limit) - 1.7 Million tokens - 58 minutes of work - $1.8 API usage So... the model is EXTREMELY efficient and usage for GPT-6.1 Sol is "better" You are getting 370 Million tokens in total per month!! and a total of $360 worth of API usage And ALSO speed and quality is so "low" that you'd better use Astra or get a $20 Claude Pro for Sonnet 5.5 Opus 5.5 did a LOT better than this video Your choice now. Imma go with Claude tbh

🚨 codex users!! I tested GPT-6.1 Sol at max and.... it is BAD I gave it a prompt to create a motion graphics video it used: - 2% weekly limit (15% 5 hr limit) - 1.7 Million tokens - 58 minutes of work - $1.8 API usage So... the model is EXTREMELY efficient and usage for GPT-6.1 Sol is "better" You are getting 370 Million tokens in total per month!! and a total of $360 worth of API usage And ALSO speed and quality is so "low" that you'd better use Astra or get a $20 Claude Pro for Sonnet 5.5 Opus 5.5 did a LOT better than this video Your choice now. Imma go with Claude tbh

shownotover

30,228 Aufrufe • vor 5 Tagen

When u use Fable / Opus to generate models it can be quiet a pain in the ass to do small iterations. I also needed a way for the model to easily visualise the results of what he built so he could iterate over it. So I built a custom model viewer it can access and where I can easily fine tune models manually if needed. Used it for my game Valoria

When u use Fable / Opus to generate models it can be quiet a pain in the ass to do small iterations. I also needed a way for the model to easily visualise the results of what he built so he could iterate over it. So I built a custom model viewer it can access and where I can easily fine tune models manually if needed. Used it for my game Valoria

moht

11,216 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

Opus 5.5 sculpted every part of this ship in code, including the dragon, sails, and architecture. I can't say it has bad taste anymore. But it still needs steering, so I tried a new way of prompting. Live site: I asked Opus to score every part of the scene: the ship, water, landscapes, buildings, and their individual parts. Then I asked it to keep improving each part until it scored at least 8 out of 10, depending on my token and time budget. The key is to let it work as long as possible. The longer it works, the better it gets, until it reaches a point where I need to course correct. For me, Opus 5.5 reaches a level of detail and realism that no other model does.

Opus 5.5 sculpted every part of this ship in code, including the dragon, sails, and architecture. I can't say it has bad taste anymore. But it still needs steering, so I tried a new way of prompting. Live site: I asked Opus to score every part of the scene: the ship, water, landscapes, buildings, and their individual parts. Then I asked it to keep improving each part until it scored at least 8 out of 10, depending on my token and time budget. The key is to let it work as long as possible. The longer it works, the better it gets, until it reaches a point where I need to course correct. For me, Opus 5.5 reaches a level of detail and realism that no other model does.

Meng To

54,231 Aufrufe • vor 11 Tagen