Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

Go Home

Or why did she delete the Google Drive that contained discovery items that were shown to the grand jury, should have been turned over to Aidan's defense but never were, and was the real reason the CW was never going to be able to see his charges through to...

lindseygaetani's profile picture

Lindsey Gaetani

5,084 subscribers

38,723 views • 9 months ago •via X (Twitter)

ComedyNews & Politics
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

Megan Thee Stallion’s former bodyguard, Justin Edison, was supposed to testify for the prosecution in Tory Lanez’s case but he never showed up. His father, Harold Edison, said investigators from the LA District Attorney’s Office were looking for his son, even sending a SWAT team into his home and handcuffing him in front of his 8-year-old daughter. He spoke out, saying the family was being harassed and calling on Megan Thee Stallion and the DA to leave them alone. During the trial, prosecutors told the jury Edison would testify and share specific information but he never did. The jury never knew why a key witness didn’t appear, and Tory’s team had no way of knowing what Edison would have said. On appeal, Tory’s lawyers pointed this out, highlighting how the missing testimony affected witness credibility and the jury’s perception of the case. They stated they had never seen any statement or interview from Edison and had no idea what he would have testified to. The jury was shown a witness that never appeared, promised evidence they never got, and left to fill in the gaps themselves. #FreeTory
0:21

Megan Thee Stallion’s former bodyguard, Justin Edison, was supposed to testify for the prosecution in Tory Lanez’s case but he never showed up. His father, Harold Edison, said investigators from the LA District Attorney’s Office were looking for his son, even sending a SWAT team into his home and handcuffing him in front of his 8-year-old daughter. He spoke out, saying the family was being harassed and calling on Megan Thee Stallion and the DA to leave them alone. During the trial, prosecutors told the jury Edison would testify and share specific information but he never did. The jury never knew why a key witness didn’t appear, and Tory’s team had no way of knowing what Edison would have said. On appeal, Tory’s lawyers pointed this out, highlighting how the missing testimony affected witness credibility and the jury’s perception of the case. They stated they had never seen any statement or interview from Edison and had no idea what he would have testified to. The jury was shown a witness that never appeared, promised evidence they never got, and left to fill in the gaps themselves. #FreeTory

Msкαуℓєιgнᵇᵅᵇᵞ ✨

84,957 views • 8 months ago

This angers me to my core! But it explains ALOT! Because Erika Kirk knew what Charlie was going through and she KNEW what they wanted to do…. I believe to my core, that Andrew Kolvet was right when he told Candace Owens that “it was supposed to be her”! I believe that Charlie…. Loved Candace so much…. Listen to me‼️ Charlie loved Candace so much….. that he was willing to… and did…. DIE FOR HER‼️‼️‼️ Erika knows this too…. That’s why she HATES Candace Owens so much! I would too! If my husband was willing to lay down his life for another woman…. I would hate her too! But why not just say that? Why not just tell the TRUTH‼️ They wanted Charlie to sacrifice Candace Owens and he REFUSED to‼️ That’s why Charlie knew they were going to kill him. That’s why Charlie wanted to change his will. Because he knew it was going to be him or her, because what they had planned, (war in Iran) the two of them together (because he would have been against it wholeheartedly) would have been too POWERFUL to stop‼️‼️‼️ I believe this TO MY CORE‼️‼️‼️ Candace Owens you’re really putting the pieces to this scary puzzle together, just know, Charlie loves you, he knew you would be his David, and he knew that if they would have gotten you instead, he would be fighting equally as hard for you as you are for him!!!! Know this‼️‼️‼️‼️
4:41

This angers me to my core! But it explains ALOT! Because Erika Kirk knew what Charlie was going through and she KNEW what they wanted to do…. I believe to my core, that Andrew Kolvet was right when he told Candace Owens that “it was supposed to be her”! I believe that Charlie…. Loved Candace so much…. Listen to me‼️ Charlie loved Candace so much….. that he was willing to… and did…. DIE FOR HER‼️‼️‼️ Erika knows this too…. That’s why she HATES Candace Owens so much! I would too! If my husband was willing to lay down his life for another woman…. I would hate her too! But why not just say that? Why not just tell the TRUTH‼️ They wanted Charlie to sacrifice Candace Owens and he REFUSED to‼️ That’s why Charlie knew they were going to kill him. That’s why Charlie wanted to change his will. Because he knew it was going to be him or her, because what they had planned, (war in Iran) the two of them together (because he would have been against it wholeheartedly) would have been too POWERFUL to stop‼️‼️‼️ I believe this TO MY CORE‼️‼️‼️ Candace Owens you’re really putting the pieces to this scary puzzle together, just know, Charlie loves you, he knew you would be his David, and he knew that if they would have gotten you instead, he would be fighting equally as hard for you as you are for him!!!! Know this‼️‼️‼️‼️

Sam’sFamReacts

224,471 views • 1 month ago

Candace CALLS OUT TPUSA. Why won't they release the videos they have that they NEVER shared with the public? Candace Owens drops some very interesting information on TYLER ROBINSON and about the case, and calls out TPUSA because they won't release more information and the videos that they have that were never seen yet. WHY? She states that if people were accusing you to be involved, why wouldn't you release the videos to prove that you weren't involved? She does have a point. All the information should be released. But like I've stated before, they could be holding back because the case is still open and they don't want to compromise the investigation. She also did confirm that Charlie did start a DOGE team to investigate where the money was going and coming from. More from where it was all coming from? Was it an inside job. The one thing I will say is that the people there on that day that were all a part of his team and security did act very suspicious that day. Keep digging and eliminating theories that don't hold up as we go. Stick to the facts, but remember, there are layers, optics, and timing, to everything. cc: Candace Owens,
2:51

Candace CALLS OUT TPUSA. Why won't they release the videos they have that they NEVER shared with the public? Candace Owens drops some very interesting information on TYLER ROBINSON and about the case, and calls out TPUSA because they won't release more information and the videos that they have that were never seen yet. WHY? She states that if people were accusing you to be involved, why wouldn't you release the videos to prove that you weren't involved? She does have a point. All the information should be released. But like I've stated before, they could be holding back because the case is still open and they don't want to compromise the investigation. She also did confirm that Charlie did start a DOGE team to investigate where the money was going and coming from. More from where it was all coming from? Was it an inside job. The one thing I will say is that the people there on that day that were all a part of his team and security did act very suspicious that day. Keep digging and eliminating theories that don't hold up as we go. Stick to the facts, but remember, there are layers, optics, and timing, to everything. cc: Candace Owens,

The SCIF

143,527 views • 1 year ago

🚨🚨 Juror in #RobertRoberson’s trial just testified that she now believes he is INNOCENT, that the entire case against him was 'shaken baby syndrome' - not beating - and that the jury did not have all the evidence. I keep being told to believe the jury. So I went and found an actual juror from 2003. She couldn’t wait to testify. Here’s what she had to say: Fact: this was ONLY a shaken baby case. Fact: the prosecution never gave evidence that Nikki was beaten. Fact: the jury knew nothing about the severity of Nikki’s illness and her extensive history of illness. Fact: the jury did NOT hear everything they needed to in order to make a correct decision in this case. Fact: this juror, having learned the new scientific evidence, now believes Robert is INNOCENT and would NOT have voted to convict. I believe this juror, who knows more about the trial than those opining on Twitter. Justice demands a new trial. Watch 👇 #txlege
36:28

🚨🚨 Juror in #RobertRoberson’s trial just testified that she now believes he is INNOCENT, that the entire case against him was 'shaken baby syndrome' - not beating - and that the jury did not have all the evidence. I keep being told to believe the jury. So I went and found an actual juror from 2003. She couldn’t wait to testify. Here’s what she had to say: Fact: this was ONLY a shaken baby case. Fact: the prosecution never gave evidence that Nikki was beaten. Fact: the jury knew nothing about the severity of Nikki’s illness and her extensive history of illness. Fact: the jury did NOT hear everything they needed to in order to make a correct decision in this case. Fact: this juror, having learned the new scientific evidence, now believes Robert is INNOCENT and would NOT have voted to convict. I believe this juror, who knows more about the trial than those opining on Twitter. Justice demands a new trial. Watch 👇 #txlege

Brian Harrison

27,671 views • 2 years ago

Threadguy explains why everyone will pretend they didn't see the Saylor blowup coming "Let's say this thing really does blow up. Saylor death spirals, the whole thing comes apart. Economists are going to look back years from now and say, wow, the people of the 2020s were so retarded, how did they not see this coming? And the answer is everybody did." "People thought it was a good investment, but the ones who thought that took the stance of, they have enough cash for a year or two and then we get out. It's going to end terrible, it's a bad idea, but for six, maybe twelve months it's going to be great. It's free money for a year and then it blows up, and by then it's not my problem." "So they'll look back and ask how these guys were dumb enough to fund the whole stretch thing, but in reality everybody knew. The people buying it knew, the people selling it knew, the people on the sidelines knew, the people that wanted to buy it knew. I feel like everybody had the same stance on this. It was more or less, I don't know how it's going to blow up, but it's not going to end well. It's going to be fine for six months. To me, that was the perspective."
1:24

Threadguy explains why everyone will pretend they didn't see the Saylor blowup coming "Let's say this thing really does blow up. Saylor death spirals, the whole thing comes apart. Economists are going to look back years from now and say, wow, the people of the 2020s were so retarded, how did they not see this coming? And the answer is everybody did." "People thought it was a good investment, but the ones who thought that took the stance of, they have enough cash for a year or two and then we get out. It's going to end terrible, it's a bad idea, but for six, maybe twelve months it's going to be great. It's free money for a year and then it blows up, and by then it's not my problem." "So they'll look back and ask how these guys were dumb enough to fund the whole stretch thing, but in reality everybody knew. The people buying it knew, the people selling it knew, the people on the sidelines knew, the people that wanted to buy it knew. I feel like everybody had the same stance on this. It was more or less, I don't know how it's going to blow up, but it's not going to end well. It's going to be fine for six months. To me, that was the perspective."

Kai

32,114 views • 4 months ago

The FDA sat on the information and said nothing. The algorithm was allowed to keep masking signals. The whistleblower was ordered to cease and desist. The injured were told to wait for a study that never came. Evil And the American public was told there was nothing to see. The algorithm being used to analyze COVID vaccine safety data was designed, (or at minimum allowed,) to hide what was actually happening. Peter Marks was warned directly. A new system was developed that unmasked 25 serious safety signals. Marks told them to go away. Senator Ron Johnson's conclusion after reviewing 11 million documents is not complicated: they knew exactly what they were doing. The FDA saw the vaccine injured. They heard them. They treated Brianne Dressen and 22 others, told them to stay silent, and promised to publish studies so other injured people could get the same treatment. Those studies were never published. The injured community did not want fame or an apology. They wanted other sick people to be able to get treatment. Evil.
1:38

The FDA sat on the information and said nothing. The algorithm was allowed to keep masking signals. The whistleblower was ordered to cease and desist. The injured were told to wait for a study that never came. Evil And the American public was told there was nothing to see. The algorithm being used to analyze COVID vaccine safety data was designed, (or at minimum allowed,) to hide what was actually happening. Peter Marks was warned directly. A new system was developed that unmasked 25 serious safety signals. Marks told them to go away. Senator Ron Johnson's conclusion after reviewing 11 million documents is not complicated: they knew exactly what they were doing. The FDA saw the vaccine injured. They heard them. They treated Brianne Dressen and 22 others, told them to stay silent, and promised to publish studies so other injured people could get the same treatment. Those studies were never published. The injured community did not want fame or an apology. They wanted other sick people to be able to get treatment. Evil.

The HighWire

11,116 views • 6 months ago

FOX: "We do not have evidence that he was waving a gun or doing anything to threaten Border Patrol. He had his phone and he was viewing and recording the incident." Rep. James Comer: "They got all these white liberals coming in trying to run over ICE, trying to spray them and do everything to disrupt…If I were President Trump I would almost think about…maybe [going] to another city and let the people of Minneapolis decide, do [they] want to continue to have all these illegals…It's very clear that a majority of Americans want the criminal illegals apprehended, and that is what ICE is trying to do."
2:13

FOX: "We do not have evidence that he was waving a gun or doing anything to threaten Border Patrol. He had his phone and he was viewing and recording the incident." Rep. James Comer: "They got all these white liberals coming in trying to run over ICE, trying to spray them and do everything to disrupt…If I were President Trump I would almost think about…maybe [going] to another city and let the people of Minneapolis decide, do [they] want to continue to have all these illegals…It's very clear that a majority of Americans want the criminal illegals apprehended, and that is what ICE is trying to do."

The Bulwark

446,161 views • 9 months ago

Joe Rogan and Terry Bradshaw discuss why ivermectin was downplayed during COVID while vaccines were pushed. “A lot of evidence that the reason why they were not telling people to take ivermectin is because they wanted everybody to get vaccinated.” “The reason why they wanted to get everyone to get vaccinated is not because it was effective.” “It's because they wanted to make a lot of money.” “When you're talking about drugs, you're talking about a lot of money.”
0:25

Joe Rogan and Terry Bradshaw discuss why ivermectin was downplayed during COVID while vaccines were pushed. “A lot of evidence that the reason why they were not telling people to take ivermectin is because they wanted everybody to get vaccinated.” “The reason why they wanted to get everyone to get vaccinated is not because it was effective.” “It's because they wanted to make a lot of money.” “When you're talking about drugs, you're talking about a lot of money.”

End Tribalism in Politics

18,648 views • 4 months ago

Lindsay Clancy and attorney Kevin Reddington stipulation to facts in the trial. This stipulation (admission of guilt) was made so that the commonwealth would not need to bring in dozens of additional witnesses to prove that Clancy murdered her children and the blood and dna evidence directly linking her. Likely to save time and to prevent Clancy from further emotional outbursts in the courtroom. The only question has ever been; Should she be criminally responsible for the murders? Was she in a state of mind where she knew right from wrong? Somehow people continue wanting to believe she never admitted guilt. She did. Somehow people continue stating that the commonwealth failed to prove that she did. They didn’t have to because of the stipulation of facts.
5:43

Lindsay Clancy and attorney Kevin Reddington stipulation to facts in the trial. This stipulation (admission of guilt) was made so that the commonwealth would not need to bring in dozens of additional witnesses to prove that Clancy murdered her children and the blood and dna evidence directly linking her. Likely to save time and to prevent Clancy from further emotional outbursts in the courtroom. The only question has ever been; Should she be criminally responsible for the murders? Was she in a state of mind where she knew right from wrong? Somehow people continue wanting to believe she never admitted guilt. She did. Somehow people continue stating that the commonwealth failed to prove that she did. They didn’t have to because of the stipulation of facts.

John Curtis

25,264 views • 1 month ago

Patrick: I'm not a judge or a lawyer, but I presided over the impeachment trial. I learned a lot. I studied how to be a judge, how to give jury instructions. This jury, 34 charges, and they come back like that. It's clear to me they didn't consider any of the evidence..
0:30

Patrick: I'm not a judge or a lawyer, but I presided over the impeachment trial. I learned a lot. I studied how to be a judge, how to give jury instructions. This jury, 34 charges, and they come back like that. It's clear to me they didn't consider any of the evidence..

Acyn

871,702 views • 2 years ago

I never knew Lisa Leslie was referring to the dallas wings as one of the teams that rejected her??? Lmao I get why she said that the people they hired aren’t better than her then cause what. CHRIS BRO??
0:55

I never knew Lisa Leslie was referring to the dallas wings as one of the teams that rejected her??? Lmao I get why she said that the people they hired aren’t better than her then cause what. CHRIS BRO??

leavemealone

269,345 views • 1 year ago

According to the House Intel report that Tulsi Gabbard released, the DNC knew Hillary Clinton was unstable and had health issues. But they still WANTED her to be president. Was it possibly because they knew she would make a good puppet because of all the dirt they had on her?
1:47

According to the House Intel report that Tulsi Gabbard released, the DNC knew Hillary Clinton was unstable and had health issues. But they still WANTED her to be president. Was it possibly because they knew she would make a good puppet because of all the dirt they had on her?

Glenn Beck

412,240 views • 1 year ago

And this is where Candace loses: If the defense could adduce evidence of fabricated documents, conspiracy, fake messages… they would not do it at the preliminary hearing for probable cause, but would wait until the trial? That the defense was precluded from adducing such evidence at the preliminary hearing? Absolute nonsense. True, it is not the trial. But there is no realm of the universe in which the defense would not attempt to adduce evidence - to the extent that you could, either through cross or direct - of fabricated / falsified text messages, manufactured documents and/or conspiracy to frame. They were not prevented from doing so at the preliminary hearing. They simply did not present anything to suggest the messages were fabricated, that a bullet did not kill Charlie, and other elements that, if remotely demonstratable, would easily be an obstacle for even the lower threshold of probable cause. And that is exactly why they could not deny them in their latest filing.
1:59

And this is where Candace loses: If the defense could adduce evidence of fabricated documents, conspiracy, fake messages… they would not do it at the preliminary hearing for probable cause, but would wait until the trial? That the defense was precluded from adducing such evidence at the preliminary hearing? Absolute nonsense. True, it is not the trial. But there is no realm of the universe in which the defense would not attempt to adduce evidence - to the extent that you could, either through cross or direct - of fabricated / falsified text messages, manufactured documents and/or conspiracy to frame. They were not prevented from doing so at the preliminary hearing. They simply did not present anything to suggest the messages were fabricated, that a bullet did not kill Charlie, and other elements that, if remotely demonstratable, would easily be an obstacle for even the lower threshold of probable cause. And that is exactly why they could not deny them in their latest filing.

Viva Frei

60,889 views • 2 months ago

ELON: SOCIAL MEDIA AND FREE SPEECH WOULD HAVE PREVENTED THE NAZIS TO HIDE THEIR ACTIONS “One of the first things the Nazis did when they came in, is to shut down all the press and any means of conveying information. If there had been social media, I think it would have been impossible to hide, if there'd been freedom of speech as well. It's worth noting that the First Amendment in the United States was freedom of speech because the people that came to the United States from other countries did not have freedom of speech. If they had said something, they could be imprisoned or killed. That's why the first correction to the Constitution was the ability to say what you want to say and not be thrown in prison or killed.” Source: European Jewish Association, January 2024
0:43

ELON: SOCIAL MEDIA AND FREE SPEECH WOULD HAVE PREVENTED THE NAZIS TO HIDE THEIR ACTIONS “One of the first things the Nazis did when they came in, is to shut down all the press and any means of conveying information. If there had been social media, I think it would have been impossible to hide, if there'd been freedom of speech as well. It's worth noting that the First Amendment in the United States was freedom of speech because the people that came to the United States from other countries did not have freedom of speech. If they had said something, they could be imprisoned or killed. That's why the first correction to the Constitution was the ability to say what you want to say and not be thrown in prison or killed.” Source: European Jewish Association, January 2024

Mario Nawfal

6,411,423 views • 1 year ago

Elon Musk: Freedom of speech is the ability to say what you want to say without being thrown in prison or killed "One of the first things the Nazis did when they came in, is to shut down all the press and any means of conveying information. If there had been social media, I think it would have been impossible to hide, if there'd been freedom of speech as well. It's worth noting that the First Amendment in the United States was freedom of speech because the people that came to the United States from other countries did not have freedom of speech. If they had said something, they could be imprisoned or killed. And that's why the first correction to the Constitution was the ability to say what you want to say and not be thrown in prison or killed."
0:43

Elon Musk: Freedom of speech is the ability to say what you want to say without being thrown in prison or killed "One of the first things the Nazis did when they came in, is to shut down all the press and any means of conveying information. If there had been social media, I think it would have been impossible to hide, if there'd been freedom of speech as well. It's worth noting that the First Amendment in the United States was freedom of speech because the people that came to the United States from other countries did not have freedom of speech. If they had said something, they could be imprisoned or killed. And that's why the first correction to the Constitution was the ability to say what you want to say and not be thrown in prison or killed."

ELON CLIPS

1,218,602 views • 2 years ago

Amy Eskridge and her father said they had a working anti gravity machine and they were BOTH convinced they were being targeted according to Elizondo “I had the privilege of meeting Amy Eskridge years ago when she was in Huntsville, Alabama. Her and her father were absolutely convinced that they had perfected and could demonstrate and test anti-gravitics. I was supposed to go over and get a demonstration of this the month the month following. Unfortunately that didn't come to bear and it turns out unfortunately that Amy's not here anymore to answer some of these direct questions. She was absolutely convinced and so was her father that people were trying to silence them. She said this to me at a table with other witnesses.” If her father was convinced they were being targeted this would contradict one of the narratives out there that her father downplays any kind of threats against Amy
1:31

Amy Eskridge and her father said they had a working anti gravity machine and they were BOTH convinced they were being targeted according to Elizondo “I had the privilege of meeting Amy Eskridge years ago when she was in Huntsville, Alabama. Her and her father were absolutely convinced that they had perfected and could demonstrate and test anti-gravitics. I was supposed to go over and get a demonstration of this the month the month following. Unfortunately that didn't come to bear and it turns out unfortunately that Amy's not here anymore to answer some of these direct questions. She was absolutely convinced and so was her father that people were trying to silence them. She said this to me at a table with other witnesses.” If her father was convinced they were being targeted this would contradict one of the narratives out there that her father downplays any kind of threats against Amy

Red Panda Koala

38,041 views • 5 months ago