正在加载视频...
视频加载失败
Orchid quartet Orchid Quartet performing Path to Rivals at the Scoring Marvel Music Panel. Video by Adam Warlock himself Jordan Reynolds Danny Koo - 黑帮火锅 - #MarvelRivals
119,027 次观看 • 11 个月前 •via X (Twitter)
0 条评论
暂无评论
原始帖子的评论将显示在这里
正在加载视频...
119,027 次观看 • 11 个月前 •via X (Twitter)
暂无评论
原始帖子的评论将显示在这里
![repost from @thelegendsofmusic Audioslave performing “Cochise” Live at the 2003 Pinkpop Festival “Cochise” was partially inspired by the Apache chief of the same name who was born in 1812. While the lyrics don’t really have anything to do with him, the music was given that title based on the vibe. Guitarist Tom Morello has gone on the record stating that he came up with the title based on the vibe of the music - was reading about Cochise at the time. In an interview, Tom had this to say about the song: “Cochise was the last great American Indian chief to die free and absolutely unconquered. When several members of his family were captured, tortured, and hung by the US Cavalry, Cochise declared war on the entire Southwest and went on an unholy rampage, a warpath to end all warpaths. He and his warriors drove out thousands of settlers. Cochise the Avenger, fearless and resolute, attacked everything in his path with an unbridled fury. This song kinda sounds like that.” However, the lyrics to the track were written about someone who seems to be wasting their life away, warning that he/she needs to save himself. Lyricist, Chris Cornell did have someone specific in mind when he wrote it. He said the song is, “Me yelling at me, looking in the mirror.” #Music #RockNRoll #Audioslave #ChrisCornell #TomMorello #TimCommerford #BradWilk iiii]; )'](https://image.24vids.com/tw-1863848358789492895/ext_tw_video_thumb/1863848319094513664/pu/img/Gmq1scsCoTDS19SX.jpg)
![Jim Jordan, Silence, and the Ritual of Control Wrestling rooms. Masonic slips. AIPAC strings. Jim Jordan wasn’t chosen to fight the system. He was processed to protect it. They paint him as a warrior. A patriot. A populist pit bull. But behind the rolled-up sleeves and scripted outrage is a man who passed his test the way all useful actors do: With silence. Because in the Beast System, the path to power always begins with ritual. And Jim Jordan passed his. The Abuse He Watched From 1987 to 1995, Jim Jordan served as assistant wrestling coach at Ohio State University. During that time, Dr. Richard Strauss sexually abused at least 177 young men—most while Jordan was on staff. And everyone knew. “It was common knowledge,” former wrestlers told NBC. “Strauss showered with us. He groped us during exams. Everyone knew—including Jordan.” One athlete described: “I had a thumb injury… went into Strauss’ office… and he started pulling down my wrestling shorts.” Jordan didn’t speak up. He didn’t intervene. He didn’t protect them. What he did do, years later, was call one of the whistleblowers—crying, groveling, and begging him to lie: “He’s throwing us all under the bus. He’s a coward.” —Adam DiSabato, public testimony But cowardice isn’t the right word. Obedience is. In every ritualized power structure—Freemasonry, cartels, Hollywood, politics—the initiation is the same: Will you stay silent while innocence is destroyed in front of you? Silence isn’t a failure—it’s a future. It proves loyalty. It makes you useful. And once proven, the doors open. [I recommend reading article on my Substack for full experience, link below] The Masonic Nod In 2013, Jordan stood before Congress to honor the late Judge John F. Kuffner. After listing his military service, Jordan dropped this: “He received Mason of the Year honors in 2008 and was a 50-year member of Mercer Lodge No. 121…” —Congressional Record, Vol. 159, Pt. 11, p. 16554 Pause. Why would a Congressman spotlight Masonic credentials in a federal tribute? Why cite the exact lodge? Why honor a “Mason of the Year” award like it’s a military medal? Because it’s a tribute to those who understand the hierarchy. Masonic honors aren’t filler—but milestones. And they’re recognized by those who value the chain of oaths behind them. Jordan didn’t mention that by accident. He mentioned it because he’s one of them. Zion Before Nation Now look at his donors: • AIPAC • Koch Industries • The NRA Jordan is not grassroots. He’s network-approved. He’s never criticized: • Israeli spyware exports • Gov ties to Epstein’s network • Thiel’s Palantir role in predictive policing • Biometric surveillance Because he can’t. You don’t bite the hand that feeds you, especially when it’s also the one watching. The Big Tech Deception Jordan has publicly positioned himself as a staunch opponent of Big Tech censorship, launching investigations and issuing subpoenas to major tech companies like Alphabet, Amazon, Apple, Meta, and Microsoft, alleging collusion with the Biden administration to suppress conservatives. However, this public stance contrasts with his actions behind the scenes. Jordan has accepted campaign contributions from tech giants, including Google, and has opposed antitrust measures aimed at breaking up these companies. Supporting Big Tech monopoly while chanting freedom. Shit like this bothers me much more than liberal retardation—but that’s a story for another time. Moreover, his close relationship with Elon Musk, a major tech figure, raises questions about his true intentions. Jordan has praised Musk’s efforts to combat censorship and has collaborated with him on various initiatives, including legislative changes that could benefit Musk’s business interests and military contracts. This duality suggests that Jordan’s public crusade against Big Tech may serve as a smokescreen, shielding deeper alliances and agendas. More below 👇🏻](https://image.24vids.com/tw-1912549773476876579/amplify_video_thumb/1912549479263133697/img/TqOnWCvn0oTglCqy.jpg)
![Failure To Release Epstein Files “Could Cost Us The Majority,” Worry Republicans “The people telling the president he could stop this [legislation] gave him awful advice,” says member of Congress Many in the MAGA movement responded with outrage and upset last July, following President Trump’s declaration in a cabinet meeting, and in subsequent social media posts, that there was nothing of importance in the large number of Jeffrey Epstein files that the FBI and Department of Justice are still holding. Those files allegedly include the names of individuals who participated in or were trapped in a sex blackmail operation tied to the US Intelligence Community, the CIA, and Israeli intelligence. Now, Rep. Thomas Massie’s (R-Ky.) is close to gathering a final needed 218th signature on a “discharge petition,” which would require a vote on the H.R.4405 - Epstein Files Transparency Act. That Act would mandate the FBI and Justice Department release the Epstein files as early as next month. The legislation explicitly states that personal embarrassment is not a reason for the FBI or DOJ to withhold documents from the public. “This vote is coming,” a Republican member of Congress told Public, “and it will pass the House with flying colors. This is inevitable. The people telling the president he could stop this gave him awful advice.” All of the individuals who spoke to Public were Republicans, and several suggested they feared the impact of the White House’s strategy on their party. “This is sucking the air out of the room and taking attention away from the other great things the administration is doing,” one member of the Republican conference said. Said another, “This is the behavior that could cost us the majority.” These comments were made to Public before the release of an interview with a former Justice Department investigator who claimed, to an undercover reporter working with James O’Keefe, that former President Bill Clinton was on Epstein’s plane when girls were being raped, and that Epstein worked for both the CIA and the Israeli government. In response to a query from Public, White House spokeswoman Abigail Jackson said, “Democrats and the media knew about Epstein and his victims for years and did nothing to help them while President Trump was calling for transparency, and is now delivering on it with thousands of pages of documents as part of the ongoing Oversight investigation.” It is possible that the Files do not contain any significant new information. FBI Director Kash Patel last week told the Senate that he had no evidence that Epstein was trafficking women for anyone other than himself. And some journalists have pointed out inconsistencies in claims made by alleged Epstein victims. But if there is nothing of significance in the Epstein Files, then it is not clear why the Trump administration has sought to prevent their release. The explanation from the Trump administration for why the files can’t be released has shifted. Patel told Congress that the Epstein files were constrained by limited search warrants from 2006 to 2007, and that non-prosecution agreements hindered future investigations. However, those constraints only apply to the Southern District of Florida, not to the Southern District of New York. Epstein had homes in both states. In the hearing, Rep. Massie said he had evidence that the FBI had documents naming at least 20 men, including Jess Staley, CEO of Barclay’s Bank, and a “Hollywood producer worth a few hundred million dollars, one royal prince, one high profile individual in the music industry, one very prominent banker, one high profile government official, one high profile former politician, one owner of a car company in Italy, one rock star, one magician, at least six billionaires.” In August, the New York Times published photographs showing two hidden surveillance cameras in Epstein’s New York apartment. One of them pointed at a bed in a bedroom. Republicans and Democrats alike panned FBI Director Kash Patel’s testimony relating to Epstein last week. “Patel either doesn’t have operational control over this or he does and is using terms of art like ‘credible evidence’ to get around it,” said a House member. Earlier this month, Republicans on the House Rules Committee rejected an effort to put the Epstein Files Transparency Act to a floor vote. And, notes Axios, House Speaker Mike Johnson has, in the past, “tucked language in party-line procedural measures to kill” past petitions, and could try to do so again. But Johnson “faced blowback when he employed the tactic” last spring, said Axios, and the House Rules Committee Chair told reporters that her panel would not block a floor vote on the petition. According to another Republican member of Congress, “The members who voted against [allowing a vote on the Epstein Files bill] got hammered back home and were pissed. They don’t want to take a ‘no’ vote again.” In response, “West Wing staffers” at the White House have been aggressively demanding and threatening the handful of Republican Congressmembers who have joined Massie in signing the discharge opinion.... Please subscribe now to support Public's independent investigative journalism, read the rest of the article, and watch the full video!](https://image.24vids.com/tw-1970987084233179208/amplify_video_thumb/1970986265664430080/img/RdUcozf-_pkLmHjm.jpg)
