Video yükleniyor...
Video Yüklenemedi
Our elected Members have agreed that Hampstead Heath’s Bathing Ponds will remain trans-inclusive spaces under a future access policy. Upgrades to toilets and shower areas will also improve facilities, privacy, and changing areas, with more private cubicles for swimmers. ➡️
568,015 görüntüleme • 4 ay önce •via X (Twitter)
34 Yorum

Silly cunts.

No surprise at all to someone who grew up in the City and some of its sexist institutions - historically deeply-embedded misogyny clearly takes centuries to overturn.

You haven't got the hang of this whole "compliance with the law" thing, have you?

When I swam there this week, I saw - for the first ever time on an early-morning swim - a trans-identified man sitting in the meadows where women dress and undress. @cityoflondon has enabled voyeurism. Thanks!

Just popping this here ⬇️

Three ponds for men to use but not one for women only bathing and you think this is progressive? Give me strength.

So all your ponds will be mixed sex but you're going to falsely advertise 2 of them as men & women only respectively! See you in court, morons!

Thanks you, it's important that women like me are able to dangle our balls in women's faces 🙏

If this annoys you, please consider sharing or donating to the legal challenge

"Trans-inclusive" means men in the women's pond. There's a men's pond, a mixed-pond and another mixed pond. Women don't matter to the City of London.

@GenderReceipts You are not above the law.

What about women?

I am not a UK lawyer but you seem to be ignoring what I understand to be the law. But there is another question here: why does the idea that women should have a private, safe space where men, however they identify, are not allowed, trouble you?

They don't want "private cubicles" they want men kept out of the women's pond. What are you not understanding?

@GenderReceipts Inclusive? Which pool can be used by Muslim or orthodox Jewish women, who are not allowed to be in a state of undress around men? Seriously, where do they go? I will tell you: they go home to their, bcs of you, smaller lives. Your smugness is revolting, as I'm sure you intended.

@GenderReceipts Then you may not have a ladies pond or a men’s pond, you should make it clear that all ponds are mixed sex if you intend to comply with the law.

By "will remain trans-inclusive" you mean the women's bathing pond will include men. Because the women's pond already includes trans men. Because trans men are women. Stop trying to hide your misogyny with weasel words. It's not working.

Shame on you. Safeguarding failures.

I'm going to hazard a guess that you like to wear women's underwear, you look the type...

I hope it’s chock full of nothing but fat ugly blokes in bikinis.

A member vote does not nullify the law. See you in court, soon!

@GenderReceipts Why? Why is it so important to you? Is it really so abhorrent that females have private spaces?

You cant vote to not comply with the law on single sex spaces. You can call the all ponds unisex/mixed sex ponds if you want and allow males and females access ,but you cant vote to allow eg: some males to access the womens/female pond. Surely, you can see that?

@GenderReceipts Oh look - yet another man telling women to shut up and put up with men in their spaces.

And what are you going to be calling these "inclusive pools"?

66% of your weird consultation didn’t even want 3 mixed sex pools and yet here you have exactly that.

So you have decided 3 mixed sex ponds is the way to go?

Access for transvestites and predators Your elected members are misogynistic idiots

You are breaking the law and being reckless not only with women’s safety, but also with City of London funds You deserve to be sued and I hope heads roll over this contempt for women

@GenderReceipts ‘Trans inclusive’ means mixed-sex. If Hampstead is to have three mixed-sex ponds, then some women will be excluded, those unable/unwilling to swim/change alongside men. You’re cowards. You’ve given men access to all three, rather than protect the rights of women. Grotesque.

You will be sued, and you will lose.

Expect a massive lawsuit incoming, bros.

You accept men are going into the women’s ponds to see women changing by providing more private cubicles. Either TW are women, in which case let them ecpose their “female” genitalia in front of women, or they are men, in which case offer private changing areas, so women can change in private away from penises and testicles. Make your mind up.

All you people sticking up for men in women's spaces are perverts! You know they are men!

