正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

Our full Ja’Marr Chase interview: - Last personal goal: 23 receiving TDs - Why he loves pissed ‘mean Joe’ Burrow - 2 cornerbacks who give him hardest challenge “by far” - Start of camp scuffle w/ Bengals defenders - Why he doesn’t watch WRs anymore - His camp standouts...

17,698 次观看 • 1 个月前 •via X (Twitter)

0 条评论

暂无评论

原始帖子的评论将显示在这里

相关视频

“Wake the F up Joe, It’s time to get better.” Joe Burrow Expectations may be high, but that is nothing new for Cincinnati Bengals Joe Burrow who is ready for it all this NFL season. We didn’t bring our cigars and we wore shirts that had backs, but our conversation didn’t disappoint when you get to sit with one of the coolest and smoothest, who just happens to be one of the NFL’s top quarterbacks- it’s a training camp treat! Joey B is a man of few words, so when he speaks, you better listen. 🫡 Ryan Clark Fred Taylor Channing Crowder chop it up and cover everything on and off the field surrounding the man once deemed the King of the North, looking to get back that title, lead his team deep into the post season & to another Super Bowl. Joe shares his process, giving us a glimpse inside the mindset of one of the best playing the game, ignoring personal criticisms and only answering to his own inner goals. Doing it his way, the LSU tiger turned Cincinnati Bengal has reached high peaks of success early in his NFL career with 2 trips to the AFC Championship and a Super Bowl despite being derailed by injury, but heading into 2024- the QB says he’s back and better than before 👀 Don’t let the slim shady hair and fashion walks fool ya, Joey B is committed, confident and just a guy who loves football...and darn good at it too. Tap into a new episode of our NFL Training Camp Tour in partnership with Fanatics streaming on YouTube and all audio platforms now. #nfl #afc #quarterback #bengals #cincinnati #joeburrow #

Pivot Podcast

214,110 次观看 • 2 年前

🔥🤔 YOU CANT UNSEE IT. JAMES TALARICO IS A TROJAN HORSE. Does this sounds like a “Christian to any of you” “I HESITATE BEFORE TELLING SOMEONE IM A CHRISTIAN. THERE IS A CANCER ON OUR RELIGION” - James Talarico the Texas Senate candidate Obama likely handpicked. What if I told you he told Joe Rogan that the bible mentioning men laying with each other being an abomination in the Bible may just be a EUPHEMISM. What if I told you he loves Trans kids sticking up for their “rights”? What if he is obsessed with telling people Jesus never discussed GAY MARRIAGE? What if I told you he was a theater kid growing up? What I told you that on Obama’s podcast with Maron he went out of his way to mention Talarico? Ever wonder who is close to Colbert that arranged for that controversial Talarico interview? Why would a Christian say “Christian Nationalism kills? “ Who else do know that used to make references to IMPERIALISM? Ever wonder why James Talarico never once discussed having girlfriend until a day after people questioned it? The ONLY mention of having a girlfriend was installed in an a news article BY HIS TEAM who claimed he dated the prom queen. Isn’t that odd? Anyone ever track her down? Wonder why he did the seemingly NEXT DAY podcast in LA with a woman who interview Michelle multiple times? Who else was in LA that day ? Michelle. Obama was in Texas with Talarico campaigning for him. Why is Talarico so important to Obama? Does he see this as a pet project to finally turn a Texas seat blue? What are Talarico’s true colors and nature? For such a Christian he sure does seem to be a paradox. Are we ever going to meet this girlfriend of his that manifested of thin air??

Johnny St.Pete

58,840 次观看 • 4 个月前

Paul Samuelson was the first American to win the Nobel Prize in Economics. He spent his career proving that ordinary people should not try to beat the market. He also quietly beat the market himself for 60 years. His last full-length interview explains how. Almost nobody has watched it. Samuelson taught at MIT for 65 years, from 1940 until he died in 2009. His textbook "Economics" sold roughly four million copies. He rewrote the field. Every finance professional working today learned economics from a book he wrote or a book written by his students. He also ran his own money quietly. His returns reportedly outpaced most active managers of his era, and he was an early investor in Warren Buffett's Berkshire Hathaway. He never advertised the numbers. He said the opposite in public. His most famous line about investing: "Investing should be more like watching paint dry or watching grass grow. If you want excitement, take $800 and go to Las Vegas." He was one of the earliest advocates for index funds. He believed almost nobody could beat the market and almost nobody should try. His nephew Larry Summers became Treasury Secretary. His students founded half the modern economics profession. He was invited into every important economic policy debate of his lifetime. His view on personal finance was unusually blunt for a Nobel laureate. In one of his final interviews, near the end of his life, he explained his framework in three sentences. Personal finance is not a science. It is a set of common-sense decisions repeated for decades. Save more than you spend. Diversify. Do not chase excitement. Do not trust anyone who promises certainty. He said these things thousands of times over 70 years and the industry ignored him every year. The full interview covers his childhood, his years at Chicago and Harvard, his rise at MIT, his Nobel, and his philosophy on money. He was 94 years old at the time. His voice is thin and his answers are direct. He does not soften anything. He treats the interviewer like a graduate student who happens to be holding a camera. The more sophisticated a market becomes, the more valuable the boring advice becomes. Every investor who ignored Samuelson's rules is a receipt for how right he was. Every quant who read his mathematics and skipped his common sense missed the point. Samuelson died December 2009. He was 94. His textbook is still in print. The interview is free.

Ochob

203,308 次观看 • 2 个月前

🔴JK🌟Was LIVE | 6.28.26 | 4 hours As one of the lucky ones who was able to watch JK’s four-hour live last night, I wanted to share what I took away from it. Fair warning: this is a long one… but he did give us four hours of content. 😅 Read if you’d like! First, and most importantly, Jungkook wants us to see him for who he is: a responsible adult who is capable of making his own decisions. He wants people to stop questioning every choice he makes, every word he says, and every aspect of how he lives his life. He is happy. He told us himself, “I’m so good.” He takes his health and well-being seriously, and he knows what works for him. He works hard, and like many adults, enjoys winding down sometimes with good food, alcohol, or both. He’s naturally nocturnal and thrives on the schedule that suits him. He doesn’t need unsolicited advice about how he should sleep or live. After the show, he went out to eat with the members, before returning to his hotel to film the dance challenge, which took over 50 takes. It was another reminder of how much pride he takes in his work. He always wants to show us, and himself, the very best he can do. Right now, he’s immersed in dance. He’s studying locking, krumping, and other house styles because he genuinely wants to become an even better dancer. He wants keep sharing dance challenges with us, because that’s one of the ways he can give us something new right now. He said he doesn’t actually listen to music that often, unless it is connected to a dance video, but when he does, he’s been enjoying a lot of music from his fellow idols, especially girl groups. He even shared a few songs he’s been playing on repeat lately. He’s also been enjoying anime, talking about several series he’s been watching and how excited he is for the next season of Cyberpunk: Edgerunners. He spoke honestly about learning English. He has a teacher, and he wants to improve, but it’s difficult and he simply doesn’t have enough time to devote to it. At the same time, he made it clear, again, that he doesn’t want people constantly asking or telling him to speak English. As he has said so many times: “I don’t speak English. I’m Korean.” If you choose to watch his lives, stop asking for it! One of the most candid moments was hearing him talk about big brand events. He admitted that they make him uncomfortable, saying Taehyung loves them and is much better at them. Small talk doesn’t come naturally to him, and he gets shy with all the eye contact. But, like the professional he is, he has learned how to do it well, because it’s part of his job, and because he genuinely appreciates the brands he works with, speaking warmly once again about his Calvin Klein collaboration. And then there’s what has always been part of Jungkook’s core: singing. He simply loves to sing. He loves exploring his voice, learning new techniques, experimenting with different genres, and constantly improving. He watches YouTube vocal tutorials to keep growing. Karaoke isn’t just fun for him, it’s practice, exploration, and another way to become a better artist. Listening to him sing throughout the live was a gift. Beautiful, playful, effortless, and unmistakably Jungkook. His performance of “Into the Sun” was my personal highlight, with perfectly placed vocal runs, delicate high notes, and emotion woven into every line. This is only a small part of what Jungkook shared with us over those four hours. I’m incredibly grateful that he gave us so much of his time, his thoughts, his laughter, and his music. My biggest takeaway is this: if you choose to log into his lives, then let him live. Keep your cringy comments to yourself. He doesn’t want to see them, and neither do we. Listen to what he’s actually telling you, trust him to know what’s best for himself, and simply enjoy the rare privilege of spending time with him. Thank you, Jungkook. We love you. 💜

TaeKook USA 🇺🇸 #김태형 #정국

36,906 次观看 • 3 个月前

⚠️ Trump’s Moments of Clarity Keep Getting Overruled Joe Kent (Joe Kent) exposes the real battle shaping U.S. strategy in the Iran war — the fight inside Trump’s inner circle. ⚠️ He warns that the rare voices urging restraint are being drowned out by a warhawk echo chamber he once described in his resignation letter. Kent says Trump’s moments of clarity never last because he’s “whispered back into his ear” by figures telling him “you’ve got to remain strong… you’re so close to victory" - despite overwhelming evidence there is no victory to be had, near or far. He names the influencers directly: “(Gen) Keane and Mark Levin and (Mark) Dubowitz at FDD,” the same voices pushing escalation are trying to keep Trump from walking away -- leading him into certain defeat. Kent argues Trump must end the conflict now — because if he doesn’t, events on the ground will prove the war-lusters have been wrong from the outset, and we will eventually lose the war. Right now the President can walk away and stop the bleeding. But if he listens to the war-lusters, the bleeding of men and money will continue until the truth of our failure can no longer be hidden. This clip shows why the U.S. can’t control the pace of the Iran war — and why the next move may not come from Washington. Watch the full clip now → 🏷️ #IranWar #USStrategy #MiddleEastConflict #JoeKent #DanielDavisDeepDive #NationalSecurity #Geopolitics #ForeignPolicy #StraitOfHormuz #WarAnalysis

Daniel Davis Deep Dive

16,416 次观看 • 2 个月前

Since Andrew Kolvet wants to die on his hill of lies, let’s expose him for the demon he is by asking questions and letting Charlie Kirk and Gen Z speak for themselves for once. I think we’re all pretty sick of this dude by now. In one of Charlie’s final public roundtables — “What Gen Z Thinks About Israel,” where he was joined by Judas (Andrew Kolvet) reborn — we get a glimpse of what Charlie was really wrestling with. In a spiritual battle, you look at what you SEE and what people TELL you, then you start asking questions: Why do you think Charlie Kirk’s final student roundtable on Israel, posted 11 months ago, only has ~62k views on Turning Point USA’s YouTube? Why do you think Blake Neff melts down any time someone even suggests this all points back to the one foreign nation Charlie was, by Blake’s own admission, “complaining about” and ready to walk away from entirely? Why was Ben Shapiro allegedly called by Charlie’s security before 911 was even dialed? Why is Andrew Kolvet running LLCs with direct ties to I*rael? Why is he very cozy with Miriam Adelson? Why did our “America First” administration launch a new war in the Middle East they promised not to start — at the behest of I*rael? Why did Turning Point USA quietly pivot from “the Deep State is the imminent threat” to running PR for the very agencies Charlie warned us about? Why does Turning Point USA and its orbit rush to smear anyone demanding due process for Tyler, while the same cast once screamed about media lynch mobs around Kyle? Why does every path seem to lead back to the same tiny circle of people, and the same tiny strip of land...and the same networks that ran with Epstein and Mossad? Because this doesn’t look like “protecting Charlie’s legacy.” It looks like the deliberate, coordinated destruction of it — by the very forces he spent his last months warning us about. If Andrew wants to keep lying, fine. But the more questions we ask, the more his mask slips — and the louder Charlie’s real voice gets. Full video linked below:

Artifex Memoriarum

72,487 次观看 • 2 个月前

Dawah is deception. Why are you leaving out the context SeerahPro ? You know right after this he says he doesn’t remember well what he wrote in that entry on Muhaymin. Why leave that part out? He even goes on to say that section seems to be non-committal and he needs to go back and re-read it. So since you don’t want to show every one the full context, I’ll do it, and expose how you are lying now and lied in the debate. Sinai doesn’t help your claim that the Quran believes the previous scriptures were textually corrupted. He says he doesn’t think the Quran believes the previous scriptures were corrupted in the deep past and that they are unrecoverable (Clip 1). Now let’s look at the short clip you pulled in context (Clip 2). First, what he says does not affirm why you cited him to begin with, which is that the Quran is supposed to be a supreme authority and determine which parts of our scriptures are corrupt and which are not. In the very clip you pulled he says, “The Quran is claiming to be able to sort of determine the correct reading of these previous scriptures and to remedy misreading and misunderstandings.” So by arbiter he means it is not determining what parts of our scriptures are true or corrupted, it is only an arbiter in determining meaning. You just buried yourself by citing this, because you implied Sinai was saying the Quran is an arbiter for determining textual corruption, which he doesn’t say. It’s like you didn’t even pay attention to what you pulled. That is embarrassing. Second, right after this (in what you left out) the interviewer reminds him he entertained two possibilities in his book and was noncommittal. Sinai says he doesn’t remember what he said and was probably leaving open possibilities, which is what I already had to correct you on. If you go back to the book, once again, he said on page 707 essentially what I said, “Muhaymin, meanwhile, is derived from Syriac mhaymnā (or conceivably from its equivalent in some other form of Aramaic), a passive participle of the verb haymen and meaning ‘trustworthy, faithful, loyal.’” After this all he does in the book is mention other possibilities and the one you want is more contingent on non-canonical readings. But even if that interpretation is correct (which Sinai confirms in this interview is his view) it doesn’t help you, because you misunderstood what Sinai means by ‘arbiter.’ In Clip 3 he first says, “So I need to reread that entry. I guess it seems to be very non-committal.” But remember you said (Clip 4), “In his 'Key Terms of the Quran' he explicitly says that Muhaymin means the Quran is the arbiter of the contents.” That is incorrect. He did not explicitly say that. Why did you lie? In Clip 3 he goes on to say “But I think entrusted with authority can mean, authorized to sort of authoritatively interpret and determine especially theological significance.” So you don’t even understand what Sinai means by “arbiter.” He doesn’t mean what you mean, that the Quran is determining which parts of our scriptures are true and corrupted, but that it is an arbiter of meaning. The fact that you still do not see this means you are beyond delusional. You never should have cited Sinai because he doesn’t help you at all. The funny thing is we were already planning to go live tomorrow to review this interview because he doesn’t help you at all and unintentionally helps with the Islamic Dilemma.

InspiringPhilosophy - Michael Jones

36,857 次观看 • 2 个月前

The Joe Budden–Eminem beef didn’t start with a single diss track. It grew out of *Slaughterhouse’s time on Shady Records*, then exploded in public when Joe started ripping Eminem’s music while still signed to him‼️. The Slaughterhouse era (2011–2010s)‼️ Slaughterhouse (Joe Budden, Royce da 5'9", Joell Ortiz, and KXNG Crooked) signed to Eminem’s Shady Records in 2011. Their Shady debut, *Welcome to: Our House* (2012), was executive-produced by Eminem‼️. Joe later said the problems started there: - He felt Eminem and Paul Rosenberg tried to apply Eminem’s commercial formula (hooks, certain beats, a more “stadium” sound) to a group that was built on raw lyricism and independent mixtape energy‼️. - He complained they kept getting sent Eminem beats that “weren’t for Slaughterhouse.”‼️ - He believed the group could have done better independently and that they were mismanaged / left in Eminem’s shadow (promotion, tours, etc.)‼️. - There were disagreements over business terms and creative control. Joe has said he was fighting for a better situation for the whole group‼️. KXNG Crooked later confirmed Joe had been holding a grudge over how Slaughterhouse was handled‼️. Joe’s 2015 song “SlaughterMouse” addressed some of this — he later said it started as a diss but was rewritten into something more respectful/tribute-like‼️. Slaughterhouse never released a proper second Shady album. The group eventually fell apart‼️. The public explosion (2017–2018)‼️ The beef went public when Joe, by then more of a podcast/media personality than an active rapper, heavily criticized Eminem’s 2017 album *Revival* on Everyday Struggle and his own podcast‼️. He called “Untouchable” one of the worst songs he’d ever heard and accused the camp of using racial/political talking points as a sales gimmick. Because he was still a Shady artist, a lot of people (including some in the Shady camp) saw this as crossing a line‼️. Eminem responded: - Subliminal shots on the “Chloraseptic (Remix)” in early 2018‼️. - A direct namediss on *Kamikaze* (2018) track “Fall”: “Somebody tell Budden before I snap, he better fasten it / Or have his body bag get zipped / The closest thing he’s had to hits is smacking bitches.”‼️ Joe fired back on his podcast with a long rant, claiming he’d been better than Eminem for the entire decade and criticizing Em’s music, relevance, and character‼️. Aftermath⁉️ Eminem took a few more shots on later projects. Joe has since said (around 2020 and later) that he doesn’t have ongoing beef, that Em should stop dissing him, and that he doesn’t regret it because his intent was trying to get a better situation for Slaughterhouse. He still acknowledges Eminem’s influence on him as a younger artist‼️.

(st_ides)

65,681 次观看 • 29 天前