Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

Go Home

Our Government Has Criminalized Emotions | Bill C9 Hatred Definition Under Bill C-9, hatred is legally defined as "an emotion of an intense and extreme nature that is clearly associated with vilification and detestation." Read that again. It's not what you say. It's not what you do. It's how...

RealNicoLagan's profile picture

Nico Lagan

6,711 subscribers

15,865 views • 3 days ago •via X (Twitter)

EducationComedyNews & Politics
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

Yeah, that's not what this bill does. Nice try though. It's always refreshing to see members visibly reading talking points while shooting a video. Rep. Bakeberg (R-Jordan) sets the record straight (during a committee hearing on the actual bill, not in a scripted video): "This is not a voucher program. So for anyone to say that, it's wrong. It's just wrong. This is not a voucher program. So for those of you who said that, and you were given information, you were lied to." "Now I want to talk about the actual bill. What this bill ACTUALLY does. These are Minnesota tax dollars that our Minnesota constituents have sent to the federal government. We have the opportunity to say 'You know what? We want that $1,700 back in Minnesota.' Do some math, people!"
7:22

Yeah, that's not what this bill does. Nice try though. It's always refreshing to see members visibly reading talking points while shooting a video. Rep. Bakeberg (R-Jordan) sets the record straight (during a committee hearing on the actual bill, not in a scripted video): "This is not a voucher program. So for anyone to say that, it's wrong. It's just wrong. This is not a voucher program. So for those of you who said that, and you were given information, you were lied to." "Now I want to talk about the actual bill. What this bill ACTUALLY does. These are Minnesota tax dollars that our Minnesota constituents have sent to the federal government. We have the opportunity to say 'You know what? We want that $1,700 back in Minnesota.' Do some math, people!"

MN House GOP Rapid Response

31,225 views • 4 months ago

🚨 JUST IN: Rep. Brandon Gill is pushing to DESTROY the DIGNIDAD Act being touted by some Republicans — which gives amnesty to MILLIONS of illegals This must be DOA! "It's actually called the DIGNIDAD Act. It's a Spanish word and that's straight from the the bill text. It's written in a foreign language because it's a bill that benefits foreigners over American citizens!" "But this is an amnesty bill, plain and simple. What it does is it gives legal status to about 12 MILLION illegal aliens." "Not only that, but it says that it effectively stops the president from deporting illegal aliens!" KlLL THE BILL!
0:27

🚨 JUST IN: Rep. Brandon Gill is pushing to DESTROY the DIGNIDAD Act being touted by some Republicans — which gives amnesty to MILLIONS of illegals This must be DOA! "It's actually called the DIGNIDAD Act. It's a Spanish word and that's straight from the the bill text. It's written in a foreign language because it's a bill that benefits foreigners over American citizens!" "But this is an amnesty bill, plain and simple. What it does is it gives legal status to about 12 MILLION illegal aliens." "Not only that, but it says that it effectively stops the president from deporting illegal aliens!" KlLL THE BILL!

Eric Daugherty

85,727 views • 3 months ago

Free speech is a core value of our civilization. We need to stop Bill C-9. This bill is designed to limit your speech by labeling you as an Islamophobe or racist without any specific definition. We don’t lack laws in Canada. If the authorities do not enforce the existing laws against jihadists, and if the RCMP and CSIS receive advice from Muslim Brotherhood-linked groups, it does not mean that a new law will stop the hate rallies and the glorification of terrorism in our streets. If Bill C-9 passes, I can say: welcome to the Islamic Republic of Canada.
2:07

Free speech is a core value of our civilization. We need to stop Bill C-9. This bill is designed to limit your speech by labeling you as an Islamophobe or racist without any specific definition. We don’t lack laws in Canada. If the authorities do not enforce the existing laws against jihadists, and if the RCMP and CSIS receive advice from Muslim Brotherhood-linked groups, it does not mean that a new law will stop the hate rallies and the glorification of terrorism in our streets. If Bill C-9 passes, I can say: welcome to the Islamic Republic of Canada.

Salman Sima

23,574 views • 3 months ago

Bill Maher nukes Hollywood’s DEI quotas with a forbidden comparison you’re not supposed to say out loud. “There is a quota system in Hollywood, and I understand why they would have this… There was a time when ‘Oscar So White’ had meaning. It does not anymore. And they refuse to give that up because they love being the people who are the social justice warriors. I understand where this is coming from, but ultimately, you do not want to tell artists how to make art. “This is what they did in the Soviet Union. This is what they did in communist countries. The last place you want people making a lot of rules about how you can make your art, who you can hire to do your art — that is not what art is about. And no artist, no matter how liberal, is going to like that.”
1:01

Bill Maher nukes Hollywood’s DEI quotas with a forbidden comparison you’re not supposed to say out loud. “There is a quota system in Hollywood, and I understand why they would have this… There was a time when ‘Oscar So White’ had meaning. It does not anymore. And they refuse to give that up because they love being the people who are the social justice warriors. I understand where this is coming from, but ultimately, you do not want to tell artists how to make art. “This is what they did in the Soviet Union. This is what they did in communist countries. The last place you want people making a lot of rules about how you can make your art, who you can hire to do your art — that is not what art is about. And no artist, no matter how liberal, is going to like that.”

The Vigilant Fox 🦊

1,353,571 views • 6 months ago

Their New Social Media Ban Means Every Canadian Must Show Government ID To Access Their Accounts They call it a social media ban to protect your kids. Here's what it actually means — every Canadian will be forced to show government approved ID to access their social media accounts. Your real name. Attached to every account. Given directly to the platforms. And when you connect that to Bill C-22 which forces telecoms to retain your metadata without a warrant, Bill C-9 which criminalizes hate speech, Bill C-8 which gives the government the power to cut your internet access, and the soon to be retabled Bill C-63 — you start to see the full picture. This isn't about protecting your kids. It's about building the infrastructure to control what every Canadian can say online. I did a full breakdown of exactly how these four bills work together and what it means for every Canadian. Watch the full breakdown here 👇
0:35

Their New Social Media Ban Means Every Canadian Must Show Government ID To Access Their Accounts They call it a social media ban to protect your kids. Here's what it actually means — every Canadian will be forced to show government approved ID to access their social media accounts. Your real name. Attached to every account. Given directly to the platforms. And when you connect that to Bill C-22 which forces telecoms to retain your metadata without a warrant, Bill C-9 which criminalizes hate speech, Bill C-8 which gives the government the power to cut your internet access, and the soon to be retabled Bill C-63 — you start to see the full picture. This isn't about protecting your kids. It's about building the infrastructure to control what every Canadian can say online. I did a full breakdown of exactly how these four bills work together and what it means for every Canadian. Watch the full breakdown here 👇

Nico Lagan

87,150 views • 3 months ago

WATCH: Fox News’ Brit Hume on Elon Musk’s disappointment over funding bill: “Elon Musk has a point about the bill. It doesn't really attack spending, particularly not of the kind that DOGE notated.” “But remember this about this bill. This is a certain type of budget bill, and you can't really do much about discretionary spending in this bill.”
1:13

WATCH: Fox News’ Brit Hume on Elon Musk’s disappointment over funding bill: “Elon Musk has a point about the bill. It doesn't really attack spending, particularly not of the kind that DOGE notated.” “But remember this about this bill. This is a certain type of budget bill, and you can't really do much about discretionary spending in this bill.”

TV News Now

35,567 views • 1 year ago

Scott Jennings on the Epstein Files: Well, look, they've released how many documents tonight? 200,000 or more? 400? So, a good faith effort is being made to release files tonight… Regarding Bill Clinton, I'm sorry to tell you, the reason that Bill Clinton's picture is in the Epstein files is because this has always been a story about Bill Clinton and not Donald Trump. We should call it the Clinton files, not the Epstein files.” “That's what we're learning tonight. This is the Clinton files. This is the blowing up in the face of the Democrats over this. It's Bill Clinton — this is a story about Democrats and Bill Clinton, and it's always been that way.”
1:00

Scott Jennings on the Epstein Files: Well, look, they've released how many documents tonight? 200,000 or more? 400? So, a good faith effort is being made to release files tonight… Regarding Bill Clinton, I'm sorry to tell you, the reason that Bill Clinton's picture is in the Epstein files is because this has always been a story about Bill Clinton and not Donald Trump. We should call it the Clinton files, not the Epstein files.” “That's what we're learning tonight. This is the Clinton files. This is the blowing up in the face of the Democrats over this. It's Bill Clinton — this is a story about Democrats and Bill Clinton, and it's always been that way.”

RedWave Press

753,600 views • 7 months ago

Someone asked me how you fight a spiritual war when so many are unconscious, and what came out of me was something I didn't plan, but it's how I feel. This is the moment I've been living inside for the last decade. The fear, the doubt, the "how is any of this ever going to work," and the answer that keeps pulling me through it. It's not a strategy. It's not a plan. It's a calling. If you've ever felt paralyzed by how big this is, watch this. If you've ever wondered whether your small piece of this fight even matters, watch this. This is why we don't stop. This is why we can't stop. Amen. 🙏
1:49

Someone asked me how you fight a spiritual war when so many are unconscious, and what came out of me was something I didn't plan, but it's how I feel. This is the moment I've been living inside for the last decade. The fear, the doubt, the "how is any of this ever going to work," and the answer that keeps pulling me through it. It's not a strategy. It's not a plan. It's a calling. If you've ever felt paralyzed by how big this is, watch this. If you've ever wondered whether your small piece of this fight even matters, watch this. This is why we don't stop. This is why we can't stop. Amen. 🙏

Del Bigtree

251,721 views • 4 months ago

Don’t be scammed.!!!! What the ndc has passed today is not the LGBT Bill that was before the house. The bill as passed in 2024 and as relaid before the house, has now been mutilated by the ndc. About 31 of the old clauses have been deleted today. What has been passed now is an empty piece of legislation under the old name. It is not the same bill. Yet they are going around telling people it’s the same old bill that they promised to sign. Such a lie!!!!! When we say this ndc govt is a scam it is a matter of fact.
3:05

Don’t be scammed.!!!! What the ndc has passed today is not the LGBT Bill that was before the house. The bill as passed in 2024 and as relaid before the house, has now been mutilated by the ndc. About 31 of the old clauses have been deleted today. What has been passed now is an empty piece of legislation under the old name. It is not the same bill. Yet they are going around telling people it’s the same old bill that they promised to sign. Such a lie!!!!! When we say this ndc govt is a scam it is a matter of fact.

Kojo Oppong Nkrumah

279,726 views • 1 month ago

Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez: This is not normal. What is normal is to negotiate. When one party wants the votes of another party, you negotiate, you come to a compromise and pass a bill. That is Schoolhouse Rock, and that is how things should be
1:31

Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez: This is not normal. What is normal is to negotiate. When one party wants the votes of another party, you negotiate, you come to a compromise and pass a bill. That is Schoolhouse Rock, and that is how things should be

FactPost

86,721 views • 9 months ago

Ottawa’s Obsession with Censorship: The Liberals Want to Make Your Opinions Illegal “So this bill will affect what people can say and write on the internet?” asked MP Andrew Lawton. “It would be possible that someone could commit a hate crime on the internet. Certainly,” replied Justice Minister Sean Fraser. And there it is. Straight from the Justice Minister’s mouth, the Carney government is coming for your tweets. That exchange didn’t happen in a newsroom or a press conference. It happened inside Parliament, at the House of Commons Standing Committee on Justice and Human Rights. Lawton pressed him, trying to get a simple answer. Could something that’s perfectly legal to say online today become illegal if Bill C-9 passes? Fraser dodged, mumbled about “context,” and then finally admitted what we all suspected: yes, absolutely. But don’t worry, he said, this will only target “the willful promotion of hatred.” That’s supposed to make you feel better. Except his government changed the definition of hatred. They quietly deleted the Supreme Court’s language about “an emotion of an intense and extreme nature,” a definition that’s stood for 35 years and replaced it with something mushy and subjective. Now it’s just “vilification or detestation stronger than dislike.” In other words, if you say something a Liberal finds distasteful, congratulations, you might be guilty of hate speech. Lawton even gave him a chance to clarify. He asked if this could lead to the same nightmare we’ve seen in the UK, police knocking on people’s doors over tweets. Fraser dismissed the comparison as “inaccurate,” as if Canada is somehow morally immune from government overreach. Right. Because every government that’s censored speech always starts by promising they’ll “never go too far.” Here’s what’s actually happening: the Liberals are building an internet police force, not for child predators or scammers, but for opinions. They call it compassion, inclusion, safety, all the usual buzzwords. But underneath the soft language is the hard truth: they want the power to criminalize dissent. This is what passes for justice reform in 2025. Not fixing bail. Not cleaning up the streets. Not jailing repeat violent offenders. No... their priority is making it “easier to lay charges” for what Canadians say. So, to recap: crime is out of control, the courts are backed up, and the Justice Minister’s big idea is to go after Facebook posts. That’s not justice — that’s control disguised as virtue.
5:38

Ottawa’s Obsession with Censorship: The Liberals Want to Make Your Opinions Illegal “So this bill will affect what people can say and write on the internet?” asked MP Andrew Lawton. “It would be possible that someone could commit a hate crime on the internet. Certainly,” replied Justice Minister Sean Fraser. And there it is. Straight from the Justice Minister’s mouth, the Carney government is coming for your tweets. That exchange didn’t happen in a newsroom or a press conference. It happened inside Parliament, at the House of Commons Standing Committee on Justice and Human Rights. Lawton pressed him, trying to get a simple answer. Could something that’s perfectly legal to say online today become illegal if Bill C-9 passes? Fraser dodged, mumbled about “context,” and then finally admitted what we all suspected: yes, absolutely. But don’t worry, he said, this will only target “the willful promotion of hatred.” That’s supposed to make you feel better. Except his government changed the definition of hatred. They quietly deleted the Supreme Court’s language about “an emotion of an intense and extreme nature,” a definition that’s stood for 35 years and replaced it with something mushy and subjective. Now it’s just “vilification or detestation stronger than dislike.” In other words, if you say something a Liberal finds distasteful, congratulations, you might be guilty of hate speech. Lawton even gave him a chance to clarify. He asked if this could lead to the same nightmare we’ve seen in the UK, police knocking on people’s doors over tweets. Fraser dismissed the comparison as “inaccurate,” as if Canada is somehow morally immune from government overreach. Right. Because every government that’s censored speech always starts by promising they’ll “never go too far.” Here’s what’s actually happening: the Liberals are building an internet police force, not for child predators or scammers, but for opinions. They call it compassion, inclusion, safety, all the usual buzzwords. But underneath the soft language is the hard truth: they want the power to criminalize dissent. This is what passes for justice reform in 2025. Not fixing bail. Not cleaning up the streets. Not jailing repeat violent offenders. No... their priority is making it “easier to lay charges” for what Canadians say. So, to recap: crime is out of control, the courts are backed up, and the Justice Minister’s big idea is to go after Facebook posts. That’s not justice — that’s control disguised as virtue.

Dan Knight

30,959 views • 9 months ago

The Interview they tried desperately to Stop 🛑 Most of you have watched segments of this interview by Kerry Cassidy however this video is being narrated by someone that is helping explain what you are listening to and it's extremely helpful to give you a clear understanding. For anyone who has ever wondered what NCSWIC means, this video explains this often repeated phrase. Take a listen and try to watch it when you can really focus as it clearly explains not only NCSWIC, but also how Cern came into play as well as towards the end it talks about just how powerful your thoughts and words are. A must watch💥 Capt Kyle
21:29

The Interview they tried desperately to Stop 🛑 Most of you have watched segments of this interview by Kerry Cassidy however this video is being narrated by someone that is helping explain what you are listening to and it's extremely helpful to give you a clear understanding. For anyone who has ever wondered what NCSWIC means, this video explains this often repeated phrase. Take a listen and try to watch it when you can really focus as it clearly explains not only NCSWIC, but also how Cern came into play as well as towards the end it talks about just how powerful your thoughts and words are. A must watch💥 Capt Kyle

Capt Kyle

48,412 views • 6 months ago

HOLY CR*P 🚨 The day Charlie Kirk was killed and everyone was focused on that, Gavin Newsom and California Democrats rammed through an online censorship bill PENALTIES - If you post something on social media anywhere online that the state of California deems to be hateful, there's a penalty for that reckless violation, a civil penalty of up to $500,000. - For an intentional, knowing or willful violation, a civil penalty of up to $1 million “SB 771, passing the Assembly on September 10th, 10 days ago. Then on September 16th, passing the Senate completely under our noses, which means right now, all that stands between complete statewide government censorship is Gavin Newsom's signature” “I exaggerating about how bad this bill is? No, I am not. Here is the actual bill. You can pull this up yourself on the state's website. The Bill's called SB 771. It's called Personal Rights Liability, Social Media Platforms. In Section 2, Title 23 of the Bill, it defines the penalties for breaking this new California law - If you post something on social media anywhere online that the state, the State of California deems to be hateful, there's a penalty for that reckless violation, a civil penalty of up to $500,000 - For an intentional, knowing or willful violation, a civil penalty of up to $1 million. That is the definition of the state controlling speech, folks. — What type of speech is California trying to police here? Well, let's read from the Bill. It says, "This bill protects against online harassment, particularly when directed at historically marginalized groups." “the State of California's actively passing UK style laws that will fine you for saying the wrong thing. Pretty wild. And this bill is completely done, folks. It's passed in the House, it's passed in the Senate. All that's left is Gavin Newsom signing it into law” This is all 100% true, he even clipped screenshots from the bill and put it into the video as proof
2:12

HOLY CR*P 🚨 The day Charlie Kirk was killed and everyone was focused on that, Gavin Newsom and California Democrats rammed through an online censorship bill PENALTIES - If you post something on social media anywhere online that the state of California deems to be hateful, there's a penalty for that reckless violation, a civil penalty of up to $500,000. - For an intentional, knowing or willful violation, a civil penalty of up to $1 million “SB 771, passing the Assembly on September 10th, 10 days ago. Then on September 16th, passing the Senate completely under our noses, which means right now, all that stands between complete statewide government censorship is Gavin Newsom's signature” “I exaggerating about how bad this bill is? No, I am not. Here is the actual bill. You can pull this up yourself on the state's website. The Bill's called SB 771. It's called Personal Rights Liability, Social Media Platforms. In Section 2, Title 23 of the Bill, it defines the penalties for breaking this new California law - If you post something on social media anywhere online that the state, the State of California deems to be hateful, there's a penalty for that reckless violation, a civil penalty of up to $500,000 - For an intentional, knowing or willful violation, a civil penalty of up to $1 million. That is the definition of the state controlling speech, folks. — What type of speech is California trying to police here? Well, let's read from the Bill. It says, "This bill protects against online harassment, particularly when directed at historically marginalized groups." “the State of California's actively passing UK style laws that will fine you for saying the wrong thing. Pretty wild. And this bill is completely done, folks. It's passed in the House, it's passed in the Senate. All that's left is Gavin Newsom signing it into law” This is all 100% true, he even clipped screenshots from the bill and put it into the video as proof

Wall Street Apes

3,340,451 views • 10 months ago

Will A VPN Will Protect You From Bill C-22? You Might Not Like The Answer... Someone on my show yesterday asked if a VPN could protect them from Bill C-22. The short answer is yes — for now. But here's what nobody is telling you. Bill C-22 forces electronic service providers to save your metadata for up to one year. The good VPN companies — NordVPN, Windscribe — have already said they will not comply. They will leave Canada before they hand over your data. That leaves the bad ones. If a VPN company is still operating in Canada after Bill C-22 passes — that company is giving your information to the government. The good companies leave. The bad ones stay. And your information is not going to be protected. If you want to understand what the real implications of social media bans and Bill-22 check out my full breakdown 👇
1:35

Will A VPN Will Protect You From Bill C-22? You Might Not Like The Answer... Someone on my show yesterday asked if a VPN could protect them from Bill C-22. The short answer is yes — for now. But here's what nobody is telling you. Bill C-22 forces electronic service providers to save your metadata for up to one year. The good VPN companies — NordVPN, Windscribe — have already said they will not comply. They will leave Canada before they hand over your data. That leaves the bad ones. If a VPN company is still operating in Canada after Bill C-22 passes — that company is giving your information to the government. The good companies leave. The bad ones stay. And your information is not going to be protected. If you want to understand what the real implications of social media bans and Bill-22 check out my full breakdown 👇

Nico Lagan

17,333 views • 1 month ago

💥EXPOSED: Gary vs. CSIS Gary: "Bill C-22 is not about spying on Canadians." CSIS: "Bill C-22 is going to give us a significant advantage in terms of providing us with the building block for an investigation." What they're not telling you is that under "exigent circumstances," as deemed by the minister, they don't need judicial oversight.
1:21

💥EXPOSED: Gary vs. CSIS Gary: "Bill C-22 is not about spying on Canadians." CSIS: "Bill C-22 is going to give us a significant advantage in terms of providing us with the building block for an investigation." What they're not telling you is that under "exigent circumstances," as deemed by the minister, they don't need judicial oversight.

Wiretap Media

21,631 views • 4 months ago

.Pablo Manríquez: What do you make of the new stock trading bill that the GOP leadership is proposing? Goldman: It's barely even a stock trading bill. It's completely watered down to make it almost useless. The American people should not wonder whether elected representatives are acting in their own personal interest, or in the interest of the public. That is the standard we have to hold ourselves to. That is why the bipartisan bill is good, and that is why this watered down Republican bill just doesn't meet the moment or meet the concerns of the American public
1:00

.Pablo Manríquez: What do you make of the new stock trading bill that the GOP leadership is proposing? Goldman: It's barely even a stock trading bill. It's completely watered down to make it almost useless. The American people should not wonder whether elected representatives are acting in their own personal interest, or in the interest of the public. That is the standard we have to hold ourselves to. That is why the bipartisan bill is good, and that is why this watered down Republican bill just doesn't meet the moment or meet the concerns of the American public

Acyn

24,533 views • 6 months ago

NEW: Joe Rogan says he *is* open to having Donald Trump on his podcast because he has a lot of questions for him, specifically about the deep state. Do it, Joe Rogan 🔥 These are the questions Trump would be asked: “What is it like when you actually get into office?… When do you know that people are f*cking with you?” “When do you know that the intelligence agencies are lying to you?” “When you decided to fire Comey, what was the thought? How much did you know?” “What's the machine like? What is the deep state really like, 'cause we have all these smoky room perceptions, like from the Bill Hicks joke where they show you the Kennedy assassination from an angle you've never seen before. You know, what is the machine that runs this country? Beause it's very clear that it's not as simple as elected representatives that are doing the will of the people. It's not.” This would be the podcast episode that broke the internet 🔥
1:08

NEW: Joe Rogan says he *is* open to having Donald Trump on his podcast because he has a lot of questions for him, specifically about the deep state. Do it, Joe Rogan 🔥 These are the questions Trump would be asked: “What is it like when you actually get into office?… When do you know that people are f*cking with you?” “When do you know that the intelligence agencies are lying to you?” “When you decided to fire Comey, what was the thought? How much did you know?” “What's the machine like? What is the deep state really like, 'cause we have all these smoky room perceptions, like from the Bill Hicks joke where they show you the Kennedy assassination from an angle you've never seen before. You know, what is the machine that runs this country? Beause it's very clear that it's not as simple as elected representatives that are doing the will of the people. It's not.” This would be the podcast episode that broke the internet 🔥

Collin Rugg

8,207,186 views • 3 years ago

One of John McAfee's last messages to the people: "Some of you may be living an existence of dissatisfaction... of emptiness... of longing." "This sense of longing... is really your loss of freedom. And it is freedom for which you yearn." "And you have none in this government. A government... which started out with the people being free and the government being our servants. It has become the government is free... and it's the people that are the servants." "You have woken up to your reality. That is what you are feeling." "Wake up a bit more and do something about it."
2:00

One of John McAfee's last messages to the people: "Some of you may be living an existence of dissatisfaction... of emptiness... of longing." "This sense of longing... is really your loss of freedom. And it is freedom for which you yearn." "And you have none in this government. A government... which started out with the people being free and the government being our servants. It has become the government is free... and it's the people that are the servants." "You have woken up to your reality. That is what you are feeling." "Wake up a bit more and do something about it."

Shadow Intel

164,035 views • 2 months ago